It is unlikely that the designers of the early network, which is referred to as the “Internet” expected it to become as large as it has become. The fact that the global Internet Protocol (IP) address space for 32-bit addresses has been fully allocated is evidence of this. As the Internet grows, new problems will arise and some current problems are getting worse. For example, while network speeds and bandwidth are increasing, so are causes of network latency.
The Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) has taken steps at various times in the past and are presently taking steps to address a number of problems resulting from the Internet's growth. Problems addressed by the IETF are described in a number of “Request for Comments” (RFC) documents published by the IETF. Documents referenced herein and included by reference include: “Request for Comments” (RFC) document RFC 791 edited by J. Postel, titled “Internet Protocol, DARPA Internet Protocol Specification”, published by the IETF in September, 1981; “Request for Comments” (RFC) document RFC 1519 by V. Fuller, et al, titled “Classless Inter-Domain Routing (CIDR): An Address Assignment and Aggregation Strategy”, published by the Internet Engineering Task Force (IEFT), in June, 1999; “Request for Comments” (RFC) document RFC 2460 by S. Deering, et al, titled “Internet Protocol, Version 6, (IPv6) Specification”, published by the IETF in December, 1998; “Request for Comments” (RFC) document RFC 3513 by R. Hinden, et al, titled “Internet Protocol Version 6 (IPv6) Addressing Architecture”, published by the IETF in April, 2003; and “Request for Comments” (RFC) document RFC 2374 by R. Hinden, et al, titled “Aggregatable Global Unicast Address Format”, published by the IETF in July, 1998.
RFC 791 states, “The internet protocol implements two basic functions: addressing and fragmentation”. RFC 791 goes on to state, “A distinction is made between names, addresses, and routes. A name indicates what we seek. An address indicates where it is. A route indicates how to get there. The internet protocol deals primarily with addresses. It is the task of higher level (i.e., host-to-host or application) protocols to make the mapping from names to addresses. The internet module maps internet addresses to local net addresses. It is the task of lower level (i.e., local net or gateways) procedures to make the mapping from local net addresses to routes”.
As demonstrated in the RFCs listed above, addressing has been a source of a number of problems. In order to address a number of current and future problems facing the Internet, the subject matter described herein challenges the distinctions asserted in RFC 791 between and among names, addresses, and routes.
Accordingly, there exists a need for methods, systems, and computer program products for routing based on a path-based protocol address.
The following presents a simplified summary of the disclosure in order to provide a basic understanding to the reader. This summary is not an extensive overview of the disclosure and it does not identify key/critical elements of the invention or delineate the scope of the invention. Its sole purpose is to present some concepts disclosed herein in a simplified form as a prelude to the more detailed description that is presented later.
Methods and systems are described for routing based on a path-based protocol address.
In one embodiment, a non-transitory computer-readable media is provided for storing instructions, that when executed by one or more processors of a topology node, cause the topology node to: identify a first sequence of identifiers for data routing in a label switching network from a first node in the label switching network; identify a second sequence of identifiers for data routing in the label switching network from a second node in the label switching network; identify a policy for use in constraining data routing from the first node to a third node; include the first sequence of identifiers and the second sequence of identifiers in a third sequence of identifiers that reflects the policy such that data routing is constrained from the first node to the third node via a plurality of network paths that each include at least one node in the label switching network; and provide path information that identifies the third sequence of identifiers, for constraining data routing, according to the policy, to the third node via the second node.
In another embodiment, a system is provided, comprising; network means for data routing; and topology node means for: identifying a first sequence of identifiers for data routing in the network means from a first node in the network means; identifying a second sequence of identifiers for data routing in the network means from a second node in the network means; identifying a policy for use in constraining data routing from the first node to a third node; including the first sequence of identifiers and the second sequence of identifiers in a third sequence of identifiers that reflects the policy such that data routing is constrained from the first node to the third node via a plurality of network paths that each include at least one node in the network means; and providing path information that identifies the third sequence of identifiers, for constraining data routing, according to the policy, to the third node via the second node.
In yet another embodiment, a method is provided, comprising: at a topology node: identifying a first sequence of identifiers for data routing in a label switching network from a first node in the label switching network; identifying a second sequence of identifiers for data routing in the label switching network from a second node in the label switching network; identifying a policy for use in constraining data routing from the first node to a third node; including the first sequence of identifiers and the second sequence of identifiers in a third sequence of identifiers that reflects the policy such that data routing is constrained from the first node to the third node via a plurality of network paths that each include at least one node in the label switching network; and providing path information that identifies the third sequence of identifiers, for constraining data routing, according to the policy, to the third node via the second node.
In still yet another embodiment, a method for configuring a topology node is provided, comprising: communicatively coupling at least one non-transitory memory and one or more processors; and causing storage of the instructions on the at least one non-transitory memory where the instructions are configured to cause the topology node to: identify a first sequence of identifiers for data routing in a label switching network from a first node in the label switching network; identify a second sequence of identifiers for data routing in the label switching network from a second node in the label switching network; identify a policy for use in constraining data routing from the first node to a third node; include the first sequence of identifiers and the second sequence of identifiers in a third sequence of identifiers that reflects the policy such that data routing is constrained from the first node to the third node via a plurality of network paths that each include at least one node in the label switching network; and provide path information that identifies the third sequence of identifiers, for constraining data routing, according to the policy, to the third node via the second node.
Objects and advantages of the present invention will become apparent to those skilled in the art upon reading this description in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, in which like reference numerals have been used to designate like or analogous elements, and in which:
One or more aspects of the disclosure are described with reference to the drawings, wherein like reference numerals are generally utilized to refer to like elements throughout, and wherein the various structures are not necessarily drawn to scale. In the following description, for purposes of explanation, numerous specific details are set forth in order to provide a thorough understanding of one or more aspects of the disclosure. It may be evident, however, to one skilled in the art, that one or more aspects of the disclosure may be practiced with a lesser degree of these specific details. In other instances, well-known structures and devices are shown in block diagram form in order to facilitate describing one or more aspects of the disclosure. It is to be understood that other embodiments and/or aspects may be utilized and structural and functional modifications may be made without departing from the scope of the subject matter disclosed herein.
The use of “including”, “comprising”, “having”, and variations thereof are meant to encompass the items listed thereafter and equivalents thereof as well as additional items and equivalents thereof. Terms used to describe interoperation and/or coupling between components are intended to include both direct and indirect interoperation and/or coupling, unless otherwise indicated. Exemplary terms used in describing interoperation and/or coupling include “mounted,” “connected,” “attached,” “coupled,” “communicatively coupled,” “operatively coupled,” “invoked”, “called”, “provided to”, “received from”, “identified to”, “interoperated” and similar terms and their variants.
As used herein, any reference to an entity “in” an association is equivalent to describing the entity as “included in and/or identified by” the association, unless explicitly indicated otherwise.
Unless otherwise defined, all technical and scientific terms used herein have the same meaning as commonly understood by one of ordinary skill in the art to which this disclosure belongs. Although methods, components, and devices similar or equivalent to those described herein can be used in the practice or testing of the subject matter described herein, suitable methods, components, and devices are described below.
All publications, patent applications, patents, and other references mentioned herein are incorporated by reference in their entirety. In case of conflict, the present disclosure, including definitions, will control. In addition, the materials, methods, and examples are illustrative only and not intended to be limiting.
An exemplary device included in an execution environment that may be programmed, adapted, modified, and/or otherwise configured according to the subject matter is illustrated in
As used herein a “processor” is an instruction execution machine, apparatus, or device. A processor may include one or more electrical, optical, and/or mechanical components that operate in interpreting and executing program instructions. Exemplary processors include one or more microprocessors, digital signal processors (DSPs), graphics processing units, application-specific integrated circuits (ASICs), optical or photonic processors, and/or field programmable gate arrays (FPGAs). Processor 104 may access instructions and data via one or more memory address spaces in addition to the physical memory address space. A memory address space includes addresses identifying locations in a processor memory. The addresses in a memory address space are included in defining a processor memory. Processor 104 may have more than one processor memory. Thus, processor 104 may have more than one memory address space. Processor 104 may access a location in a processor memory by processing an address identifying the location. The processed address may be identified by an operand of an instruction and/or may be identified by a register and/or other portion of processor 104.
Physical processor memory 106 may include various types of memory technologies. Exemplary memory technologies include static random access memory (SRAM), Burst SRAM or SynchBurst SRAM (BSRAM), Dynamic random access memory (DRAM), Fast Page Mode DRAM (FPM DRAM), Enhanced DRAM (EDRAM), Extended Data Output RAM (EDO RAM), Extended Data Output DRAM (EDO DRAM), Burst Extended Data Output DRAM (BEDO DRAM), Enhanced DRAM (EDRAM), synchronous DRAM (SDRAM), JEDEC SRAM, PC 100 SDRAM, Double Data Rate SDRAM (DDR SDRAM), Enhanced SDRAM (ESDRAM), SyncLink DRAM (SLDRAM), Ferroelectric RAM (FRAM), RAMBUS DRAM (RDRAM) Direct DRAM (DRDRAM), and/or XDR™ DRAM. Physical processor memory 106 may include volatile memory as illustrated in the previous sentence and/or may include non-volatile memory such as non-volatile flash RAM (NVRAM) and/or ROM.
Persistent secondary storage 108 may include one or more flash memory storage devices, one or more hard disk drives, one or more magnetic disk drives, and/or one or more optical disk drives. Persistent secondary storage may include a removable data storage medium. The drives and their associated computer readable media provide volatile and/or nonvolatile storage for computer-executable instructions, data structures, program components, and other data.
Execution environment 102 may include software components stored in persistent secondary storage 108, in remote storage accessible via a network, and/or in a processor memory.
Execution environment 102 may receive user-provided information via one or more input devices illustrated by an input device 128. Input device 128 provides input information to other components in execution environment 102 via input device adapter 110. Execution environment 102 may include an input device adapter for a keyboard, a touch screen, a microphone, a joystick, a television receiver, a video camera, a still camera, a document scanner, a fax, a phone, a modem, a network interface adapter, and/or a pointing device, to name a few exemplary input devices.
Input device 128 included in execution environment 102 may be included in device 100 as
An output device 130 in
A device included in and/or otherwise providing an execution environment may operate in a networked environment communicating with one or more devices via one or more network interface components.
The terms “network node” and “node” in this document both refer to a device having a network interface component to operatively couple the device to a network. Further, the terms “device” and “node” used herein refer to one or more devices and nodes, respectively, providing and/or otherwise included in an execution environment unless clearly indicated otherwise.
As used herein, the term “network protocol” refers to a set of rules, conventions, and/or schemas that govern how nodes exchange information over a network. The set may define, for example, a convention and/or a data structure. The term “network path” as used herein refers to a sequence of nodes in a network that are communicatively coupled to transmit data in one or more data units of a network protocol between a pair of nodes in the network.
A “data unit”, as the term is used herein, is an entity specified according to a network protocol to transmit data between a pair of nodes in a network path to send the data from a source node to a destination node that includes an identified protocol endpoint of the network protocol. A network protocol explicitly and/or implicitly specifies and/or otherwise identifies a schema that defines one or more of a rule for a format for a valid data unit and a vocabulary for content of a valid data unit. One example of a data unit is an Internet Protocol (IP) packet. The Internet Protocol defines rules for formatting an IP packet that defines a header to identify a destination address that identifies a destination node and a payload portion to include a representation of data to be delivered to the identified destination node. Various address types are specified defining a vocabulary for one or more address portions of an IP data unit. The terms “data unit”, “frame”, “data packet”, and “packet” are used interchangeably herein. One or more data units of a first network protocol may transmit a “message” of a second network protocol. For example, one or more data units of the IP protocol may include a TCP message. In another example, one or more TCP data units may transmit an HTTP message. A message may be empty.
How data is packaged in one more data units for a network protocol may vary as the data traverses a network path from a source node to a destination node. Data may be transmitted in a single data unit between two consecutive nodes in a network path. Additionally, data may be exchanged between a pair of consecutive nodes in several data units each including a portion of the data. Data received in a single data unit by a node in a network path may be split into portions included in several respective data units to transmit to a next node in the network path. Portions of data received in several data units may be combined into a single data unit to transmit by a node in a network path. For purposes of describing the subject matter, a data unit in which data is received by a node is referred to as a different data unit than a data unit in which the data is forwarded by the node.
A “protocol address”, as the term is used herein, for a network protocol is an identifier of a protocol endpoint that may be represented in a data unit of the network protocol. For example, 192.168.1.1 is an IP protocol address represented in a human readable format that may be represented in an address portion of an IP header to identify a source and/or a destination IP protocol endpoint. A protocol address differs from a symbolic identifier, defined below, in that a symbolic identifier, with respect to a network protocol, maps to a protocol address. Thus, “www.mynode.com” may be a symbolic identifier for a node in a network when mapped to the protocol address 192.168.1.1. An identifier may be both a symbolic identifier and a protocol address depending on its role with respect to its use for a particular network protocol.
Since a protocol endpoint is included in a node and is accessible via a network via a network interface, a protocol address identifies a node and identifies a network interface of the node. A network interface may include one or more NICs operatively coupled to a network.
A node in a pair of nodes in a network path at one end of the sequence of nodes in the network path and/or the other end is referred to herein as a “path end node”. Note that a node may have two NICs with one NIC at each end of a network path. A network path may be included as a portion of another network path that communicatively couples a same pair of nodes. Data may be transmitted via the sequence of nodes in a network path between path end nodes communicatively coupled via the network path. Data may be transmitted in one or both directions depending on an ordering of the nodes in the sequence.
The term “hop” as used herein refers to a pair of consecutive nodes in a network path to transmit, via a network protocol, data sent from a source node to a destination node. A “hop path” is thus a sequence of hops in a network that respectively include a sequence of pairs of consecutive nodes included in transmitting data from a first path end node of the network path to a second path end node of the network path.
The term “path-based protocol address” as used herein refers to a protocol address for a network protocol that includes one or more path segment identifiers that identify one or more respective portions of a network path identified by the path-based protocol address. A “node-based protocol address” is a path-based protocol address that includes a plurality of node identifiers that identify a sequence of nodes in a network path. A “network-interface-based protocol address” is a path-based protocol address that includes a plurality of interface identifiers that identify a sequence of network interfaces in a network path. A “NIC-based protocol address” is a type of network-interface-based protocol address that includes a plurality of identifiers that identify a sequence of network interface components. A “hop-based protocol address” is a type path-based protocol address since a hop is a type of network path.
Given the above definitions, note that the terms “network path” and “hop” may be defined in terms of network interfaces. A “network path” and a “hop path” include a sequence of network interfaces in a network that are included in transmitting data between a pair of path end nodes in the network. A “hop” refers to at least part of a network path that includes a pair of consecutive network interfaces in a sequence of network interfaces in a network path. A “network path” is thus a sequence of hops in a network that respectively includes a sequence of pairs of consecutive network interfaces included in transmitting data from a first path end node of the network path to a second path end node of the network path.
The term “network topology” or “topology”, for short, as used herein refers to a representation of protocol endpoints and/or nodes in a network, and representations of hops representing communicative couplings between and/or among the protocol endpoints and/or nodes in the network. A network may have different network topologies with respect to different network protocols. A network topology may represent physical communicative couplings between nodes in the network. A network topology may represent logical couplings between protocol endpoints and/or nodes of a particular network protocol or a particular type of network protocol.
The domain name system (DNS) of the Internet operates based on an application layer protocol defined by the DNS. The nodes in the DNS are communicatively coupled via the DNS protocol and may be represented by a logical network topology. A DNS system includes nodes connected via the DNS protocol. The DNS system has a network topology defined by nodes that include protocol endpoints of the DNS protocol. In still another example, a token-ring network has a circular topology at the link layer but may have a star topology at the physical layer.
As used herein, an “entity-specific address space” refers to an address space defined for a specific entity where the addresses in the address space operate as identifiers in the context of the entity. An address from an entity-specific address space is referred to herein as an “entity-specific address”. An address is “entity-specific” in that what it identifies is based on the entity to which it is specific. Another address having the same form and content may identify a different entity when in an address space specific to another entity. Addresses in an entity-specific address space operate as identifiers in the context of an entity to which they are “specific” as defined by the specific association of the address space and the entity. Without knowledge of the entity to which an entity-specific address space is specific, what an address in the entity-specific address space identifies is indeterminate. The terms “entity-specific address” and “entity-specific identifier” are used interchangeably herein. An entity-specific address may identify an entity included in the entity to which the address is specific or may identify an entity external to the entity to which the address is specific. The fact that an address is entity-specific does not define a scope for the address.
A portion of a network is a type of entity. A type of entity-specific address space described herein is a scope-specific address space. As used herein, a “scope-specific address space”, specific to a particular region of a network, is an address space defined for the particular network region, where an address in the scope-specific protocol address operates as identifier, according to a network protocol, of a protocol endpoint in a node outside of the particular region when processed in the context of a node in the particular region. The region is indicated by the span of an indicated scope. The terms “region” and “zone” are used interchangeably herein. An address from a scope-specific address space is referred to herein as a “scope-specific protocol address”. An address is “scope-specific” in that what protocol endpoint it identifies depends on the region to which it is specific. Another address having the exact same form and content may identify a different protocol endpoint when in an address space that is specific to another region. A protocol address in a scope-specific address space serves as an identifier in the context of a node in a region to which the scope-specific address space is “specific” as defined by an association of the address space and the region indicated by the scope. Without knowledge of the particular region to which a scope-specific address space is specific, what a scope-specific protocol address in the scope-specific address space identifies is indeterminate. The terms “scope-specific protocol address” and “scope-specific protocol identifier” are used interchangeably herein. Types of scope-specific address spaces indicating exemplary spans include site-specific, LAN-specific, subnet-specific, city-specific, business-specific, and node-specific.
For a network protocol, an address in a scope-specific address space serves as an identifier of a protocol endpoint in a node. Data may be received via the protocol endpoint from a network via one or more network interfaces that operatively couple the node to the network. Data may be sent via the protocol endpoint to transmit over the network via the one or more network interfaces in the node. Since a protocol endpoint of a network protocol is included in a node and is accessible via a network via a network interface, a protocol address identifying the protocol endpoint also identifies the node and identifies a network interface of the node.
As used herein, a “node-specific address space” is a scope-specific address space defined for a specific node in a network, where the addresses in the node-specific address space operate as identifiers of nodes and/or network interfaces in the network when processed in the context of the specific node. An address from a node-specific address space is referred to herein as a “node-specific address”. An address is “node-specific” in that what it identifies depends on the node to which is defined as specific. Another address having the exact same form and content may identify a different node when in an address space specific to another node. Addresses in a node-specific address space operate as identifiers in the context of a node to which they are “specific” as defined by the specific association of the address space and the node. Without knowledge of the node to which a node-specific address space is specific, addresses in the node-specific address space are indeterminate. The terms “node-specific address” and “node-specific identifier” are used interchangeably herein. A node-specific address space is a type of scope-specific address space.
The term “node” is defined above. Note that an identifier of a network interface in a network also identifies a node that includes the network interface. Thus, a network interface-specific address is also a node-specific address. Network interfaces in a node may have their own respective network interface-specific address spaces that are also node-specific. The network interface-specific address spaces may be combined to form a node-specific address space and/or may be managed as separate address spaces. The adjectives “node-specific” and “network interface-specific” may be used interchangeably.
A scope-specific identifier differs from a scoped address as described in “Request for Comments” (RFC) document RFC 4007 by S. Deering, et al, titled “IPv6 Scoped Address Architecture”, published by the IETF in December, 2006 and further described in application Ser. No. 11/962,285, by the present inventor, filed on 2007 Dec. 21, entitled “Methods and Systems for Sending Information to a zone Included in an Internet Network”. A scoped address space is shared by nodes in a given scope. While a link-local scoped address is specific to a particular node, a link-local scoped address simply identifies a network interface component local to the particular node. A loop-back internet address is specific to a node as well. Neither link-local scoped addresses nor loop-back addresses identify one node to another. As such, neither serves as a node-specific identifier as defined above.
A “scoped address” is described by RFC 3513 and RFC 4007 as an identifier that, in a particular region of a network, serves as a protocol address of a network interface and/or a node in the particular region. The extent of the particular region is referred to as the scope of the region and thus the scope within which the identifier serves as a protocol address. A particular region included within a scope is indicated by its span. A scoped address is a valid protocol address only within a particular region as indicated by the address's indicated scope. Examples of scope indicators include node-scope where identifiers are valid only to a single node in the indicated span, LAN-scope where identifiers are valid for nodes in the span of a particular LAN, and subnet-scope where identifiers are valid only for nodes in a particular subnet. RFC 3513 currently defines support for link-local scope, site-local scope, and global scope. A data unit transmitted with a scoped address should not be delivered to node that does not have a network interface in the span indicated by the scope.
“Path information” is any information that identifies a network path and/or a hop path for data transmitted via one or more specified network protocols. Path information may be identified by identifying network interfaces, NICs, nodes, and/or hops included in a network path. “Address information” is any information that identifies a protocol address that, for a network protocol, identifies a protocol endpoint. Address information may identify a unicast protocol address for a network protocol. In identifying a protocol endpoint, a protocol address identifies a node and a network interface.
Those skilled in the art will understand upon reading the descriptions herein that the subject matter disclosed herein is not restricted to the network protocols described and/or their corresponding OSI layers. For ease of illustration, the subject matter is described in terms of protocols that correspond to OSI layer three, also referred to as network layer protocols, in general. Particular descriptions are based on versions of the Internet Protocol (IP). Address information may identify one or more protocol addresses. Exemplary protocol addresses include IP addresses, IPX addresses, DECNet addresses, VINES Internet Protocol addresses, and Datagram Delivery Protocol (DDP) addresses, HTTP URLS, TCP port and IP address pairs, and the like.
The term “path-based address” is defined above. A “node-based address” is a path-based address where some or all of the address includes node identifiers that identify a sequence of nodes in a network path. A “network-interface-based address” is a path-based address where some or all of the address includes identifiers of network interfaces in a sequence in a network path. A “NIC-based address” is a type of network-interface-based address that identifies a sequence of network interface components. A “hop-based address” is a path-based address where some or all of the address identifies one or more hops in a network path. The protocol address types defined are not mutually exclusive.
The term “metric space”, as used herein, refers to a set, as defined in mathematics, where a distance between elements of the set is defined according to a metric. Metric spaces defined in Euclidean geometry are well-known examples. Those skilled in the art of metric spaces, such as Euclidian spaces, will appreciate that a one-to-one mapping may be determined and/or otherwise identified for mapping addresses from a first coordinate space having a first origin for a metric space to addresses from a second coordinate space having a second origin in the metric space. Given a mapping rule between a first scope-specific address space and a second scope-specific address space and a mapping between the second scope-specific address space and a third scope-specific address space based on a third coordinate space identifying a third origin in the metric space, a mapping from the first coordinate space to the third coordinate space may be determined. A mapping between coordinate spaces for a metric space may be included a coordinate shift and/or a rotation, for example. The mapping may be pre-specified and accessible to the nodes in one or both address spaces. Mapping between locations in a number of different metric spaces is well known in mathematics. For example, a top half of the surface of sphere may be mapped to a plane. Some will further appreciate that some metric spaces may be mapped to other metric spaces. Some of these mappings are one-to-one and/or onto.
Some or all of the exemplary components illustrated in
Components, illustrated in
A network interface includes one or more NICs identified by a protocol address of a network protocol for sending data from a protocol endpoint identified by the network protocol and/or for receiving data for the protocol endpoint.
In various contexts nodes illustrated as destination nodes 506, edge nodes 508, and/or path nodes 504 may operate as source nodes; some nodes illustrated as source nodes 502, edge nodes 508, and destination nodes 506 may operate as path nodes, and nodes illustrated as source nodes 502, edge nodes, 508, and/or path nodes 504 may operate as destination nodes. Exemplary nodes configured to operate as path nodes 504 include a router, a switch, a wireless access point, a bridge, a gateway, and the like.
A path node 504 illustrated in any of
The network components in some nodes may be configured according to a layered design or architecture known to those skilled in the art as a “network stack”. Adaptations and/or analogs execution environments 401 in
Some components illustrated in
The network layer component 403a, illustrated in
In addition to the protocols described above, protocols corresponding to layers in the OSI model above the network layer may be included in communicating via a network. The term “application protocol” as used herein refers to any protocol or combination of protocols that correspond to one or more layers in the OSI reference model above the network layer. Programs and executables operating in execution environments 401 may communicate via one or more application protocols. Exemplary application protocols include the transmission control protocol (the TCP) in the TCP/IP suite, the user datagram protocol (UDP) in the TCP/IP suite, various versions of hypertext transfer protocol (HTTP), various remote procedure call (RPC) protocols, various instant messaging protocols, various email protocols, and various other protocols for real-time communications. Data exchanged between nodes in a network may be exchanged via data units of one or more network protocols. An execution environment may include layer specific protocol components respectively configured according to the one or more network protocols. Some protocols and/or protocol components may define and/or provide services from multiple layers of the OSI model layer such as the Systems Network Architecture (SNA) protocol.
In addition to specifying schemas defining valid data units, a network protocol may define and/or otherwise be associated with a defined identifier space for identifying protocol endpoints defined according to the network protocol. The terms “identifier space” and “address space” are used interchangeably herein. For example, various versions of hypertext transfer protocol (HTTP) specify a format for HTTP uniform resource locators (URL). HTTP specifies a location in an HTTP header that identifies a URL as an identifier or address from the HTTP address space that identifies both a resource and recipient of an HTTP data unit. The transmission control protocol (TCP) specifies a format and vocabulary for a TCP header including a destination protocol endpoint identifier field referred to as a destination port number that, when combined with a destination protocol address from an IP packet, identifies a transport layer protocol endpoint of a receiver of data sent in a TCP data unit via a network. A source protocol endpoint is similarly identified by a source port number, included in a TCP header as defined by the TCP, along with a source protocol address from an IP data unit as defined by the Internet Protocol.
Other exemplary address spaces that identify protocol endpoints in various network protocols include an email address space, a telephone number address space for various telephony protocols, instant message address spaces for various instant message protocols, and media access control (MAC) addresses for various link layer protocols, to name just a few examples. The address spaces identified are shared among the senders and receivers exchanging data via any particular protocol from among those identified herein as well as others that are known. Some address spaces are shared by senders and receivers in a LAN, an intranet, and/or in another identifiable portion of a network. Other address spaces are shared globally. For example, the HTTP identifier space is a global address space shared across the Internet. An HTTP identifier is defined to identify the same resource regardless of the application and/or node identifying the resource via the HTTP identifier. An HTTP URL is a global identifier in an HTTP network, such as the World Wide Web (Web). Addresses in a shared address space are referred to as scoped addresses that serve as identifiers of protocol endpoints in nodes that share the address space in a region of a network defined by a scope.
In delivering data via a network between protocol endpoints of a particular network protocol, addresses from address spaces of the various protocols at the various layers are typically translated and/or otherwise mapped between the various layers. For example, a unicast IP address in an IP packet is mapped to a link layer address for a link via which the IP packet is transported in a network path via a path node 504 in relaying data from a source node 502 to an identified destination node 506. Addresses at the various layers are assigned from a suitable address space for corresponding network protocols.
Given the above definitions, note that the terms “network path” and “hop” may be defined in terms of network interfaces. A “network path” is a sequence of network interfaces in a network for transmitting data in one or more data units of a specified network protocol between a pair of path end nodes in the network. A “hop” refers to a pair of consecutive network interfaces, in a pair of nodes, in a sequence of network interfaces in a network path. A hop in a sequence in a network path corresponds to a pair of network interfaces in the sequence of network interfaces in the network path. In
A network topology may represent logical hops in a network. In
With reference to
In transmitting data from a source protocol endpoint in a source node 502 to a destination protocol endpoint in a destination node 506, the data is processed by a sequence of nodes in a network path that communicatively couples the source node 502 and the destination node 506. A node in the network path, that is currently processing the data to send it to the destination 506, is referred to herein as a “current node” with respect to the data. A node in the network path that has previously transmitted the data being processed by the current node is referred to herein as a “previous node”. A node in the network path that has not received the data being processed by the current node is referred to herein as a “next node”. For ease of description, with respect to a data unit “data” refers to data sent in the data unit via a protocol endpoint in the source node, that is being processed by a current node. As such, a source node 502 may be a current node or a previous node with respect to particular data. A path node 504 may be a current node, a previous node, or a next node with respect to the particular data. A destination node 506 may be a next node or a current node with respect to particular data.
A source node 502 may be a current node with respect to data to be transmitted to a destination node 506. The source node 502 may include an adaptation, analog, and/or instance of the execution environment 401a in
A path node 504 may include an adaptation, analog, and/or instance of the execution environment 401a, illustrated in
An in-data handler component 402a may detect one or more network layer protocol data units in data received from the link layer component 407a. For example, the in-data handler component 402a may detect one or more IP packets in data received in one or more Ethernet frames. The in-data handler component 402a may detect a network layer data unit that includes data from the source node 502 to relay the data to the destination node 506 identified by a protocol address in address information in the detected network layer data unit as defined by a particular network layer protocol supported by the network layer component 403a in the path node 504. A network interface component 405a in a path node 504 may receive data communicated from a source node 502 via a previous network path included in a network 500. One or more network paths may exist to receive the data. A path node 504 may receive data from a source node 502 and may transmit the received data to a destination node 506 via a specified protocol. For example, a path node 504 may receive and transmit data in one or more data packets at a link layer as performed by an Ethernet bridge and a multiple protocol-labeling switch (MPLS). Further, a path node 504 may receive and transmit data in one or more data packets at a network layer as performed by an Internet protocol (IP) router. Still further, a path node 504 may receive and transmit data in one or more data packets at an application layer, as defined above.
Accordingly, data from a source node 502 may be included in and/or may include data formatted according to a link layer protocol, a network layer protocol, and/or an application layer protocol. An in-data handler component 402a may be configured according to a network layer protocol, a link layer protocol, and/or an application layer protocol.
A network protocol defines one or more of a format defining a valid structure for a data unit and a vocabulary defining valid content of the data unit. For example, data to transmit from a source node to a destination node may be included in a payload portion of a data unit of a particular network protocol. The network protocol may define a format that identifies the payload based on one or more valid data structures for a data unit. For example, a payload portion may be identified by a location with respect to the start of a data unit or relative to another portion of the data unit. Alternatively or additionally, the network protocol may define a vocabulary defining a keyword, a bit pattern, and/or other detectable marker that when detected identifies a payload or part of a payload in a data unit. The network protocol may define one or more format rules and/or vocabulary rules that an in-data handler component may detect in identifying data and/or address information in a data unit. The term “schema” refers to a definition of a structure and/or a vocabulary for constructing and/or detecting a valid data unit with respect to a network protocol. For example, both an IPv4 data packet and an IPv6 data packet are specified according to a schema for including address information in a destination protocol address field and in a source protocol address field in an IP header based on location and size.
Data received from a source node 502 by a path node 504 may be received via one or more previous path nodes 504. Data may be received by a current node 504 from a previous node based on a previous-current path segment identifier included in a path-based protocol address that identifies a destination node 506. The previous-current path segment identifier identifies a network path from the previous node to the current node for transmitting the data.
Returning to
In
Address representations 602 in
Alternatively or additionally, a routing component 404a may identify, based on information in a next address field 610a, a next-current path segment identifier, in the path-based protocol address, that identifies the current node with respect to a next node. A routing component 404a interoperating with an in-data handler component 402 may determine the current-next path segment identifier, that identifies the next node, based on the next-current path segment identifier. In another aspect, a routing component may determine the next-current path segment identifier based on the current-next path segment identifier.
With respect to
In an aspect of the method illustrated in
At the source node 502a, the address separator field 604a may be set to include a size of zero for a previous address field 608a. The address information field 606a, thus, includes a next address field 610a at the source node 502a and identifies the destination node 506a with respect to nodes in the first region 510a1 by identifying a specific network path included in transmitting data from the source node 502a to the destination node 506a.
At a first path node 504a1, outside the first region 510a1, an address separator field 604a in a data unit including the data from the source node 502a, may include a value of 1 that identifies, in a previous address field 608a, a previous-current path segment identifier, in destination protocol address, identifies the first path node 504a1. A routing component 404a in a first path node 504a1 may detect the value. The routing component 404a may also identify, based on the value in the address separator field 604a, a next address field 610a that identifies 2.2.3.2 as a current-next path segment identifier that, in the destination protocol address, also identifies the destination node 506a. The routing component 404a may detect the current-next path segment identifier.
At the destination node 506a a data unit including the data from the source node 502a may include a value in an address separator field 604a that indicates that the address information field includes only a previous address field 608a identifying the network path 1.2.2.3.2, which is included in the destination path-based protocol address.
In another aspect, the method illustrated in
The above description describes an address representation 602a processed in the role of a destination path-based protocol address in a data unit of a network protocol, such as a version of the internet protocol. An address information field 606a may include source address information sent in one or more data units included in sending data from a source node to a destination node. Returning to
As described above and further described below, a path-based protocol address may include and/or may otherwise be based on path information for a network path included in communicatively coupling a pair of nodes in a network. Detecting a path-based protocol address and/or a protocol address in a path-based protocol address may include determining path information identifying a network path included in communicatively coupling a pair of path end nodes included in transmitting data from a source node to a destination node.
In an aspect, illustrated in
Path information may include hop information identifying a hop. Next address information may be defined by a network protocol to include next path information identifying a current-next path identifier of a next network path included in communicatively coupling a current node and destination node. Alternatively or additionally, previous address information may be defined by the network protocol to include previous path information identifying a previous-current path segment identifier of previous network path included in communicatively coupling the current node and the source node. Next path information may include next hop information identifying a hop in the next network path. Previous path information may include previous hop information identifying a hop in the previous network path. A network protocol may define a hop identifier to be a valid protocol address that identifies a protocol endpoint.
In
A source node 502c may identify a destination node 506c by a destination path-based protocol address. The protocol address may be based on a sequence of hop identifiers 0.1.3.2.3.0.51. Note that other network paths are illustrated for transmitting data from the source node 502c to the destination node 506c and may also identify path-based protocol addresses that identify the destination node 506c to the source node 502c.
A seventh path node 504c7 in the identified network path may identify the destination node 506c based on another sequence of hop identifiers 3.0.51 that identifies a path segment. The sequence of hop identifiers may identify a protocol address that, in the destination path-based protocol address, identifies the destination node 506c. Note that a routing component 404a operating in the seventh path node 504c7 may detect the path segment identifier sequence 3.0.51, in and/or otherwise based on the path-based protocol address of the destination node 506c. Further, the routing component 404a may detect a path segment identifier for the eighth path node 504c8 as well as a path segment identifier for the ninth path node 504c4, in and/or otherwise based on the protocol address based on the path segment identifier 3.0.51.
The destination node 506c is illustrated in a third region 510c3. Within the third region 510c3, the destination node 506c may be identified by a local scoped address 51, which identifies a path segment. Nodes in the third region 510c3 may identify nodes outside the third region 510c3 by path-based protocol addresses, and may use local scoped addresses to identify nodes in the third region 510c3.
The hop identifiers 0.1.3.2.3.0.51 may be represented in a path-based protocol address in an address representation 602c in a data unit included in sending data from the source node 502c to the destination node 506c. At the seventh path node 504c7, a routing component 404a may determine and/or otherwise detect a path segment identifier identifying a network path to a next node based on a next address field identifying the path segment identifier 3.0.51 in the path-based protocol address. The identifiers may be given a bit or binary representation and the hop identifiers may be distinguished or separated via address separator fields 604c as described above with respect to
Note that the address information that identifies one or more path segment identifiers for the seventh path node 504c7 and for the destination node 506c in the preceding description may include information to identify a return path or a portion thereof. For example, the path-based protocol address 3.0.51 includes the path segment identifier 0.3, which may be included in a path-based protocol address that identifies the seventh path node nodes in the third region 510c3 and may be path-based protocol address that identifies the seventh path node 504c7 to the ninth path node 504c9. The path-based protocol address 0.1.3.2 includes another path-based protocol address 2.3.1 that identifies a network path from the seventh path node 504c7 to a node having a network interface in first region 510c1, illustrated by a second path node 504c2.
Separate source address information may be included in a data unit received by the seventh path node 504c7 that includes data sent from the source node 502c. Address information in the data unit may include a source path-based protocol address representation 602c that may identify 2.3.1.101 as a protocol address that identifies the source node 502c. Note that 101 may identify a hop in the first region 510c1 from the second path node 504c2 to the source node 502c, in some aspects. For example, subnet 514c1 may be a LAN. In another aspect, 101 may be a scoped address that identifies the source node 502c in the scope of the first region 510c1. Thus, a path-based protocol address may include a scoped address, which may identify a path segment.
The path-based protocol address illustrated
In
For the first path node 504b1, an address representation 602d in a data unit including data received from the source node 502b may include previous address information, identified by a routing component 404a based on one or more address separator fields 604, that identifies the path segment identifier 151-254 and/or that identifies the path segment identifier 254-151. The sequence ordered as 151-254 may be a path segment identifier, in a destination path-based protocol address, that identifies the first path node 504b1. The sequenced ordered as 254-151 may be a path segment identifier, in source path-based protocol address, that identifies the source node.
Further for the first path node 504b1, the address representation 602d may include next address information identified by the routing component 404a based on one or more address separator fields 604d that identify the sequence 151-254.253-105 in a first order and/or in a second order. The sequence 151-254.253-105 in the first order may identify a path-based protocol address that identifies the destination node 506b. The sequence 105-253.254-151 in the second order may identify a path-based protocol address that identifies the first path node 504b1.
Still further, for the first path node 504b1, the next address information identified by the routing component 404a identifies the sequence 151-254 in a first order and/or in a second order. The sequence 151-254 in the first order may be a path segment identifier, in the destination path-based protocol address, that identifies a second path node 504c2 in a network path to the destination node 506b. The sequence 254-151 in the second order may be a path segment identifier, in the source path-based protocol address, that identifies the first path node 504b1. A sequence of hop identifiers based on interface identifiers may serve as a first path-based protocol address when processed in one order of the sequence and may serve as a second path-based protocol address when processed according to another order of the sequence.
In
For a second path node 504b2, an address representation 602e in a data unit including data received from the source node 502b may include previous address information identified by a routing component 404a in the second path node 504b2 based on one or more address separator fields 604e that identifies a previous path segment identifier 254.254 in previous address information in the address representation 602e. The previous path segment identifier may identify a protocol address that identifies the second path node 504b2. Further, for the second path node 504b2, the previous address information identified by a routing component 404a in the second path node 504b2 identifies a first path segment identifier 254 that identifies a network interface of the second path node 504b2 to nodes with network interfaces in the second network 514b2. Yet further for the second path node 504b2, the address representation 602e may include next address information identified by the routing component 404a in the second path node 504b2 based on one or more address separator fields 604e that identifies a scoped address 105. The scoped address 105 in the scope of the third network 514b3 identifies the destination node 506b to nodes with network interfaces in the third network 514b3, such as the second path node 504c2.
Returning to
In
In an aspect, determining a next network interface based on a path segment identifier of a next node may include detecting an interface identifier in the path segment identifier. In
As described above, the routing component may determine that a path segment identifier based on the sequence 3.0.51 identifies a network path to the destination node 506c. Further, the hop identifier 3 may be a path segment identifier identifying a network path to the eighth path node 504c8 as a next node. The number 3, as described above is assigned to identify a hop including the seventh path node 504c7 and the eighth path node, and thus identifies a network interface, in the seventh path node 504c7, that is included in the hop.
Identifying a next network interface may include performing a mapping and/or lookup that maps a portion of a path segment identifier identifying a network path to a next node to an identifier that identifies a NIC 405a to a link layer component 407a. A next network interface may be identified by mapping a path segment identifier to a link layer address by means of a lookup table or record associating the path segment identifier with the link layer address.
A path-based protocol addresses illustrated in any of
Returning to
In
The one or more network layer protocol data units may be provided to a link layer component 407a as data to include in one or more link layer protocol data units to transmit via a NIC 405a based on the network interface identified by the forwarding component 406a. In a node with one NIC operatively coupled to a physical data transmission medium or with multiple NICs operatively coupled to the shared data transmission medium, an out-data handler component 408a may send network layer data packets via the one NIC or any of the multiple NICs over the physical data transmission medium for delivery to the destination node 506 according to network interface identified by the forwarding component 406a. Link layer protocol data units may be sent by the link layer component 407a according to a compatible link layer protocol and link layer address information. For example, Ethernet frames may be sent as link layer protocol data units via an Ethernet cable operatively coupled to a NIC 405a1 included in a suitable network path for transmitting the data to the destination node 506.
Data sent from a source node 502 to an identified destination node 506 may be received in a data unit of a network protocol by the first NIC 405b1 in the path node 504. The data may be detected by an in-data handler component 402b1 operatively coupled to the first NIC 405b1. A path-based protocol address may be detected in an address representation included in the data unit according to the network protocol. The in-data handler component 402b1 may send the some or all of the path-based protocol address to a routing component 404b via an internal communications medium 421b, such as a bus 116 in
The routing component 404b may determine the path segment identifier of the next node as describe above and/or in an analogous manner. The routing component 404b may provide some or all of the path segment identifier to a forwarding component 406b. The forwarding component 406 may identify a second line card 409b2 including a second NIC 405b2, based on some or all of the path segment identifier. The forwarding component 406b may interoperate with the GPU 419b to configure the internal data transmission medium 421b to deliver the data received in the data unit from the first line card 409b1 to the second line card 409b2 for final packaging in one or more data units of the network protocol by an out-data handler component 408b2. The out-data handler component 402b2 may interoperate with a second NIC 405b to transmit the data via a data transmission medium to which the second NIC 405b2 is operatively coupled.
In
A routing agent (RA) component, such as a first RA component 404c1, may identify a path segment identifier based on address information detected by a first in-data handler (IDH) component 402c1. Based on some or all of the path segment identifier, the first FA component 406c1 may identify a next line card 409c, such as the second line card 409c2, to transmit data received from a source node 502 to a next node identified by the path segment identifier as described above with respect to
The following aspects of the method illustrated in
Detecting the data may include receiving the data in a data unit sent by a previous node based on a previous-current path segment identifier, in the plurality, that identifies the current node with respect to the previous node.
The first path-base protocol address may identify a destination node for receiving the data from a source node, via the current node and the next node, according to the network protocol. The first path-base protocol address may include the plurality in an identified first order that identifies the destination node, and the plurality in an identified second order may be included in a second path-based protocol address for transmitting data from the destination node to the source node in one or more data units of the network protocol. The first order and/or the second order may be identified by sequence information represented separately from the plurality. The current node may be the source node. The next node may be the destination node.
The first path-base protocol address may be a scope-specific protocol address that, in a source scope-specific address space specific to a first region of the network that includes the source node, identifies the destination node included in the network outside the first region. In still another aspect, the first path-base protocol address may be a nested protocol address that includes a protocol address that identifies a node in the network path other than the source node and the destination node.
The current-next path segment identifier may include a local scoped address that identifies the next node in a region of the network that includes both the next network interface of the current node a network interface of the next node for receiving the data. In another aspect, the current-next path segment identifier may be included in a nested protocol address that includes a protocol address that identifies a node in a network path for transmitting the data from the current node to the next node. In an additional aspect, the current-next path segment identifier may be included in a scope-specific protocol address that, in a current scope-specific address space specific to a current region of the network that includes the current node, identifies the next node that is outside the current region.
In yet another aspect, the current-next path segment identifier may include a next hop identifier that identifies a next pair of consecutive nodes in a network path from the current node to the next node for transmitting the data to the next node. One or more of the current node and the next node may be included in the next hop. The next hop identifier may identify the next hop to one or more of the current node and the next node. The next hop identifier may include one or more of a next interface identifier that identifies the network interface and next-current interface identifier that identifies a next-current network interface in the next node for receiving the data. The next hop identifier may be the smallest identifier available, according to a size criterion, in an identifier space for at least one of the current node and the next node.
To the accomplishment of the foregoing and related ends, the descriptions and annexed drawings set forth certain illustrative aspects and implementations of the disclosure. These are indicative of but a few of the various ways in which one or more aspects of the disclosure may be employed. The other aspects, advantages, and novel features of the disclosure will become apparent from the detailed description included herein when considered in conjunction with the annexed drawings.
It should be understood that the various components illustrated in the various block diagrams represent logical components that operate to perform the functionality described herein and may be implemented in software, hardware, or a combination of the two. Moreover, some or all of these logical components may be combined, some may be omitted altogether, and additional components may be added while still achieving the functionality described herein. Thus, the subject matter described herein may be embodied in many different variations, and all such variations are contemplated to be within the scope of what is claimed.
To facilitate an understanding of the subject matter described above, many aspects are described in terms of sequences of actions that may be performed by elements of a computer system. For example, it will be recognized that the various actions may be performed by specialized circuits or circuitry (e.g., discrete logic gates interconnected to perform a specialized function), by program instructions being executed by one or more processors, or by a combination of both. The description herein of any sequence of actions is not intended to imply that the specific order described for performing that sequence must be followed.
Moreover, the methods described herein may be embodied in executable instructions stored in a non-transitory computer readable medium for use by or in connection with an instruction execution machine, system, apparatus, or device, such as a computer-based or processor-containing machine, system, apparatus, or device. As used here, a “non-transitory computer readable medium” may include one or more of any suitable media for storing the executable instructions of a computer program in one or more forms including an electronic, magnetic, optical, and electromagnetic form, such that the instruction execution machine, system, apparatus, or device may read (or fetch) the instructions from the non-transitory computer readable medium and execute the instructions for carrying out the described methods. A non-exhaustive list of conventional exemplary non-transitory computer readable media includes a portable computer diskette; a random access memory (RAM); a read only memory (ROM); an erasable programmable read only memory (EPROM or Flash memory); optical storage devices, including a portable compact disc (CD), a portable digital video disc (DVD), a high definition DVD (HD-DVD™), and a Blu-ray™ disc; and the like
Thus, the subject matter described herein may be embodied in many different forms, and all such forms are contemplated to be within the scope of what is claimed. It will be understood that various details may be changed without departing from the scope of the claimed subject matter. Furthermore, the foregoing description is for the purpose of illustration only, and not for the purpose of limitation, as the scope of protection sought is defined by the claims as set forth hereinafter together with any equivalents.
All methods described herein may be performed in any order unless otherwise indicated herein explicitly or by context. The use of the terms “a” and “an” and “the” and similar referents in the context of the foregoing description and in the context of the following claims are to be construed to include the singular and the plural, unless otherwise indicated herein explicitly or clearly contradicted by context. The foregoing description is not to be interpreted as indicating that any non-claimed element is essential to the practice of the subject matter as claimed.
With reference to
In an aspect, hop information may be received in an exchange between a first node in a hop and one or more of a second node in the hop and a third node in the network. A hop may be detected in response to exchanging and/or otherwise receiving the hop information.
Further, hop information for a network protocol may be detected by detecting an active protocol end point, such as a TCP port, for the network protocol and/or any network protocol included in activating the protocol endpoint.
Hop information may be received in response to a user input detected by an input device. In an aspect, the hop information may be included in topology information that identifies a network topology or part of a network topology. In
Hop information for a hop may be exchanged and/or received in response to detecting a change in a state of an operable coupling between a network and a network interface included in the hop and included in a node in the hop. Detecting the change may include detecting that the state indicates that the operable coupling is inoperative and subsequently detecting that the state indicates the operable coupling is operative. Detecting the change may include detecting that the state indicates that the operable coupling is operative and subsequently detecting that the state indicates the operable coupling is inoperative.
Hop information may identify an interface identifier that identifies at least one of a first network interface by which a first node is included in a hop and a second network interface by which a second node is included in the hop.
Determining that a hop identifier meets an identified hop identifier criterion may include determining that the hop identifier is the smallest, available hop identifier in an identifier space of hop identifiers.
Determining that a hop identifier meets an identified hop identifier criterion may include identifying a threshold condition that is based on the hop identifier criterion. The determining may further include detecting that the threshold condition is met by the hop identifier. The hop identifier may be determined in response to detecting that the threshold condition is met. A threshold condition may be evaluated based on a count of network interfaces included in one or more nodes in a hop, a size of a location in a data storage medium to store a hop identifier, a size of a representation of a hop identifier in a signal propagated by a specified data transmission medium, a size of a hop identifier included in a protocol address in a data unit that is valid according to a network protocol, and/or a time period to process a hop identifier included in a protocol address, to name a few examples.
A hop identifier criterion may specify and/or otherwise identify some or all of a schema that defines a valid format and/or a valid vocabulary for a representation of a hop identifier when included in a protocol address identifying a protocol endpoint of a network protocol. In an aspect, the schema may specify and/or otherwise identify a format rule defining a valid size of the representation in the protocol address included in a data unit of the network protocol. A size specified by a schema may identify a maximum size for a representation of a hop identifier. A size specified by a schema may identify a minimum size for a representation of a hop identifier. A size may identify an optimum or preferred size, based on a specified criterion, for a representation of a hop identifier. A size specified by a schema may identify a maximum size for an interface identifier included in a hop identifier. A size specified by a schema may identify a minimum size for an interface identifier included in a hop identifier. A size may identify an optimum or preferred size, based on a specified criterion, for an interface identifier included in a hop identifier.
A hop identifier may be based on one of more network interfaces in nodes in the hop. More generally a hop identifier may be based on one or more network interfaces in one more nodes for which a hop identifier serves to identify a particular hop. Thus, with respect to the method in
Returning to
Returning to
In a further aspect, a hop identifier may identify a hop to a node where the node is not in the hop.
As described above, one or more nodes in a network 500, as illustrated in
In an aspect, a topology system may include topology nodes organized as a hierarchy of topology nodes that maintain a hierarchy of the representations of respective portions of a topology of a network. In another aspect, topology nodes may operate in a peer-to-peer system.
In yet another aspect of the method, in
With reference to
Returning to
Returning to
Nested protocol addresses illustrated in
Returning to
With reference to
Returning to
Address representations 602 in
Alternatively or additionally, a routing component 404a may identify, based on information in a next protocol address field 610a, a current protocol address, that, in a next scope-specific address space specific to a next region that includes the next node, identifies the current node. A routing component 404a interoperating with an in-data handler component 402 may determine a next protocol address, in the current scope-specific address space, that identifies the next node, based on the current protocol address. Further, the next scope-specific address space may be a node-specific address space specific to the next node. In another aspect, a routing component may determine the current protocol address based on the next protocol address.
In still another aspect, a scope-specific address may conform to a currently known schema defining a valid Internet Protocol address as specified by RFC 791 and/or RFC 3513 in a scope-specific address spaces specific to a region. The scope-specific address is processed as scope-specific as opposed to interpreting it as included in a global address space as is currently done. In one aspect, a mapping may be specified between two scope-specific address space. In another aspect, a mapping may be specified from a scope-specific address space to a global address space. A mapping may be ruled-based and/or may be specified by associations such as represented by a lookup table.
A routing component 404a in a current node 504 may detect first address information identifying a current-first protocol address that, in a current scope-specific address space specific to a current region that includes the current node 504, identifies a first node in the network. Second address information identifying a first-second protocol address that, in a first scope-specific address space specific to a first region that includes the first node, identifies a second node in a network path including the current node to transmit data from a source node 502 and an identified destination node 506. The routing component 404a operating in the current node 504 may detect a relationship between the current-first protocol address and the first-second protocol address. The routing component 404a may generate a first-to-current mapping rule based on the relationship. The routing component 404a may process the first-second protocol address based on the first-to-current mapping rule to determine a current-second protocol address that, in the current scope-specific address space, identifies the second node in the network path. The second node may be a next node with respect to the current node 504 and the data from the source node 502. The second node may be the destination node 506.
A current-first protocol address 10.22.106.3 from a current scope-specific address space, may serve as an identifier with respect to the current node of a first node in the network. A first-second protocol address 40.88.58.1 in a first scope-specific address space, may serve as an identifier with respect to the first node of a second node. The current-first protocol address and first-second protocol address, in the example, include four parts. A first-first protocol address may be represented as 0.0.0.0 that, in the first scope-specific address spaces identifies the first node. A routing component 404 in the current node 504 may determine that the current-second protocol address, in the current scope-specific address space, for the second node may be calculated based on the mapping rule represented here as 40+10mod256.88+22mod256.106+58/mod256.3+1mod/256, or 50.110.164.4.
The mapping rule may be specific to the current scope-specific address space and the second scope-specific address space, may be specific to an identified group of scope-specific address spaces specific to a respective group of regions, and/or may apply among all scope-specific address spaces in use by nodes in a network. Those skilled in the art will see given the examples than many mapping rules exist that allow protocol addresses to be determined from previous protocol address information and next protocol address information according to the method illustrated in
A next protocol address and/or a previous protocol address may be determined and/or otherwise identified based on one or more of a schema of one or more of a destination protocol address and/or a source protocol address identified in an address information portion of a data unit, a schema of a scope-specific hop identifier, a mapping between two or more of the schemas or portions thereof of two or more respective scope-specific address spaces, relationships between the nodes to which the protocol addresses are specific, relationships between the scope-specific address spaces of the protocol addresses, and relationships between the nodes in a network that includes them. Some of the relationships listed may be represented in a network topology of the network. A routing component 404 may detect some or all of the network topology in determining a next protocol address and/or a previous protocol address.
Returning to
For scope-specific protocol addresses that do not include an identifier of a next node, a similar lookup operation may be performed. In an aspect, a scope-specific address may be mapped to another address space such as global protocol address space or subnet-specific protocol address space shared by nodes in a portion of a network such as a LAN and/or a sub-network. Performing a mapping operation may reduce the number of lookup tables and/or records that must be maintained and/or otherwise accessed.
Protocol addresses illustrated in
Returning to
The following aspects of the method illustrated in
A first hop including a first hop node and a second hop node, both in the network path, may be identified with respect to the previous node by a previous hop identifier in a previous scope-specific address space specific to a previous region that includes the previous node, identified with respect to the current node by a current hop identifier in the current scope-specific address space, and identified with respect to the next node by a next hop identifier in a next scope-specific address space specific to a next region that includes the next node.
The first hop identifier may be assigned from a first scope-specific address space specific to a first region that includes a network interface in the first hop node to identify the first hop in response to a negotiation between the nodes in the first hop.
A current-first path hop identifier that, in the current scope-specific address space, identifies the first hop and the current-first path identifier includes the first hop identifier, wherein the current-first path identifier identifies a network path that includes the current node as a path end node, the first hop node, and the second hop node. The first hop may be included in communicatively coupling the current node and one of the source node and the destination node. The current node may be either the first hop node or the second hop node. The previous-current protocol address may include the first hop identifier or the current-next protocol address may include the first hop identifier.
With reference to
As described herein, a first node may detect address information that identifies a first-second protocol address that, in a first scope-specific address space specific to a first region that includes the first node, identifies the second node. Alternatively or additionally, the second node may detect address information that identifies a second-first protocol address that, in a second scope-specific address space specific to a second region that includes the second node, identifies the first node to the second node. Alternatively or additionally, the second node may receive address information identifying the first-second protocol address. The second node may determine the second-first protocol address based on the first-second protocol address. Alternatively or additionally, the first node may receive the second-first protocol address. The first node may determine the first-second protocol address based on the second-first protocol address.
Returning to
Returning to
As described various types of protocol addresses may conform to various schemas defining rules for formatting valid protocol addresses and/or defining vocabularies specifying valid content of a protocol address. Given first address information identifying a first protocol address and second address information identifying a second protocol address as described above with respect to the method illustrated in
A mapping rule may indicate that addresses in a first scope-specific address space have a one-to-one mapping between the first scope-specific address space and a second scope-specific address space that is based on an addend for each of the four portions of the various addresses, additionally taking the modulus of the result based on a maximum value for each address information field, and determining the absolute value to determine the final result. A third protocol address from the second scope-specific address space may serve to identify a third node in a third region. The second protocol address may be represented as, 200.10.150.33. A resolver component in the first node may determine that a third protocol address that, in the first scope-specific address space, identifies the third node may be calculated based on the mapping rule as “(200+30) mod 256.(10+66) mod 256.(150+198) mod 256.(33+254) mod 256”, or 230.76.92.31.
Nodes may exchange mapping information. In an aspect, the address information may identify a mapping rule when exchanged between nodes. The mapping rule may be determined by second node and sent to a first node. The mapping rule may include mapping information for mapping addresses from the third scope-specific address space to the first scope-specific address space.
As described above and illustrated in the accompanying drawings, the method illustrated in
In another aspect, detecting the first address information may include detecting first path information identifying a first network path. The first network path includes a first sequence of nodes included in transmitting data between the first node and the second node. Analogously, detecting the second address information may include detecting second path information identifying a second network path. The second network path includes a second sequence of nodes included in exchanging data between the second node and the third node. One or more of the first-third protocol address and the third-first protocol address may be determined based on the first path information and the second path information. The first-third protocol address and/or the third-first protocol address may identify a third network path including a third sequence of nodes included in communicatively coupling the first node and the third node.
In another aspect of the method illustrated in
Hop information may be exchanged between a first node in a hop and one or more of a second node in the hop and a third node in the network. A hop may be detected in response to exchanging the hop information. In another aspect, hop information may be exchanged in response to detecting a hop.
Hop information may be received in response to a user input detected by an input device. In an aspect, the hop information may be included in topology information that identifies a network topology or part of a network topology.
A hop including pair of nodes may include a first network interface in a first node in the pair and a second network interface in a second node in the pair.
In another, aspect, a first node may be included in a first hop that includes a second node via a first network interface and the first node may be included in a second hop that includes the second node via a second network interface. The two NICs may be associated with different internet protocol addresses. Data units including one of the IP addresses are processed by one of the NICs and data units including the other IP address are processed by the other NIC.
A first node may be included in a first hop along with a second node. The first node may be included in the first hop via a first network interface in the first node. The first node may be included in a second hop including a third node. The first node may be included in the second hop via a second network interface in the first node.
A first node and a second node may be included in a first hop in a first network path from a source node to a destination node. The first node may be included in the first hop via a first network interface in the first node included in communicatively coupling the first node and the second node. The first node and the second node may be included in a second hop in a second network path from the source node to the destination node. The first node may be included in the second hop via a second network interface in the first node included in communicatively coupling the first node and the second node.
Hop information for a hop may be exchanged in response to detecting a change in a state of an operable coupling between a network and a network interface included in the hop and included in a node in the hop. Detecting the change may include detecting that the state indicates that the operable coupling is inoperative and subsequently detecting that the state indicates the operable coupling is operative. Detecting the change may include detecting that the state indicates that the operable coupling is operative and subsequently detecting that the state indicates the operable coupling is inoperative.
A network protocol may be specified to exchange data between and/or among nodes that include hop agent components to determine whether certain network interfaces in the nodes are operative or inoperative. The protocol may include and/or be an extension of one more existing protocols such as the address resolution protocol (ARP), the dynamic host configuration protocol (DHCP), and/or any of numerous network protocols for announcing and/or detecting the presence of a node, a network interface, and/or other resource on a network. The protocol may be a yet unspecified protocol to count network interfaces in a region of a network.
An interface identifier included in hop information for a hop including a pair of nodes may be specified according to the requirements of a network protocol. The network protocol may be a network layer protocol, such the IPv4 and/or IPv6 protocols. The interface identifier may identify at least one node in a hop to the other. The interface identifier may be suitable to include in a data unit of a network protocol to transmit data in the data unit between the nodes in the hop. Hop information for a hop may be exchanged in more than one communication sent and/or received by a node in the hop.
Determining a hop identifier for a hop may include determining the hop identifier based on an interface identifier that identifies at least one network interface in the hop. The interface identifier may identify at least one of a first network interface in a first node in the hop and a second network interface in a second node in the hop to at least one of the first node and the second node.
A hop identifier for a hop may be based on a first interface identifier that identifies a first network interface in a first node in the hop and/or may be based on a second interface identifier that identifies a second network interface in a second node in the hop. The first interface identifier may identify the first network interface to one or both of the nodes in the hop. The second interface identifier may identify the second network interface to at least one of the first node and the second node. The hop identifier may include the first interface identifier and/or the second interface identifier.
Some or all of the exemplary components illustrated in
With reference to
Returning to
As described above and further below, path information for a network protocol may be detected in a data unit of the network protocol. The path information may be detected by a node transmitting the data unit and/or may be detected by a node receiving the data unit.
In another aspect, a message may be sent to a network directory service to register a name or symbolic identifier for a node and/or a network interface of a node. The network directory service may associate the symbolic identifier with address information, which as described herein may be path information. Path information may be detected in the registration message and/or in one or more data units of a network protocol for which an association is to be created and/or otherwise maintained by a network directory service. Further, a response to the registration message may be exchanged between the registering node and the network directory service node. The response message and/or one or more data units included in transmitting the response may include and/or otherwise identify path information that may be detected by either node. Nodes in a network path transmitting the response and/or the registration request may detect path information in one or more data units received and/or sent in relaying some or all of one or both messages. Still further, a node may send a symbolic identifier to a network directory service in a resolve message in order to resolve the symbolic identifier to a protocol address of a node and/or a network interface identified by the symbolic identifier. Path information may be detected in the resolve message and/or in one or more data units of a protocol that the symbolic identifier is associated with in an association maintained by a network directory service. Further, a response to the resolve message may be exchanged between the requesting node and the network directory service node. The response message and/or one or more data units included in transmitting the response may include and/or otherwise identify path information that may be detected by either node. Nodes in a network path transmitting the response and/or the registration request may detect path information in one or more data units that they receive and/or send in relaying some or all of one or both messages.
Returning to
With respect to the method in
In an aspect of the method illustrated in
Some or all of the exemplary components illustrated in
As the term “network topology” is defined herein, a network may have different network topologies with respect to different layers and/or network protocols and their corresponding protocol endpoints. A network topology may represent physical communicative couplings between nodes in the network. A network topology may represent logical hops in a network. In
With reference to
A region may include a single node with one or more network interfaces in the region and with no other network interfaces of other nodes in the region. All of the one or more network interfaces in the node may be in the region. Such a region is illustrated by a first region 510a1 including a source node 502a in
A node may include a network interface included in a region and may include another network interface not in the region. In
A count or a partial count of network interfaces in a node in a particular region may be detected by a node in the region or by a node in another region. Detecting a count may include receiving count information identifying the count or a portion of the count, in response to a user input detected by an input device via a node. In an aspect, a count of network interfaces and/or of NICs in one or more network interfaces in the source node 502a may be a configuration setting set in response to an input detected from a user via an input device, such as described with respect to
Detecting a count may include detecting whether network interface components in a region are in the same node. Detecting the count may further include determining that the network interface components are coupled to a same data transmission medium. Whether network interface components in the same node are coupled to a same data transmission medium may affect how network interfaces are counted. The network interface components in the network interface may be assigned the same protocol address for a particular protocol, such a network layer protocol. The internet protocol in the TCP/IP suite is an exemplary network layer protocol. Network interface components assigned the same protocol address may be counted as a single network interface when a count is for a network protocol of the protocol addresses.
In another aspect, multiple network interface components in a node may be operatively coupled to a same data transmission medium and may be included in more than one network interface for counting. Thus a node that includes multiple network interface components coupled to a same data transmission medium, may have a network interface component in the multiple network interface components in one network interface and another network interface component in the multiple network interface components may be included in another network interface.
As described above, detecting a change in a state of an operable coupling may include detecting that the state indicates the coupling is inoperative, and subsequently detecting that the state indicates the coupling is operative. Further, detecting a change in a state of a coupling may include detecting that the state indicates the coupling is operative and subsequently detecting that the state indicates the coupling is inoperative.
A count component may monitor one or more operations included in sending data and/or receiving data via an operable coupling including a network and a network interface. Detecting a change in an operable coupling may include performing an operation to send a data unit and/or to receive a data unit via the coupling, then determining whether the operation was successful.
A count may be based on whether a network interface in a region is in a node that is configured to send and/or receive a data unit of a particular network protocol via the network interface. A count of network interfaces may be performed according to the method illustrated in
Returning to
Returning to
Identifying a network interface may include identifying a schema or part of a schema defining a valid format and/or a valid vocabulary for a representation of an interface identifier. Interface identifiers are assigned to network interfaces for a purpose. Interface identifiers may be assigned to network interfaces for routing data, received via a network interface in a node, to another network interface component in the node to relay some or all of data received to another node. Interface identifiers may be included in a protocol address and/or may be included in generating a protocol address for a network protocol as described below. An interface identifier may be included in identifying a network path in a network and/or a hop including a pair of communicatively coupled nodes. As described above interface identifiers may be selected for saving power when processed in performing specific tasks, selected to save storage space, selected to save processing time, and/or selected to save on any number of other costs in performing one or more tasks. A schema may be defined based on one or more tasks and/or purposes associated with processing an interface identifier.
Schemas explicitly and/or implicitly define rules for a valid format of an interface identifier and/or rules defining a vocabulary for defining valid content of a representation of an interface identifier. A rule may define a constraint on the format or structure of an interface identifier and/or a constraint on the content of an interface identifier. Such constraints may specify or otherwise identify threshold conditions. A threshold condition may be specified by and/or otherwise based on a schema defining a valid protocol address to identify a protocol endpoint for a particular network protocol. The threshold condition may be determined based on size information defined by the schema for representing the protocol address in the data unit of the network protocol. The size information may identify at least one of a maximum size and a minimum size for a valid representation, according to the schema, of the protocol address in the data unit.
A count of network interfaces may place a constraint on the minimum size of a representation of an interface identifier that is valid according to a specified schema. A schema may define a format rule and/or a vocabulary rule that may identify a maximum count and/or a minimum count. For example, in a schema that defines and/or otherwise allows an interface identifier to be represented by a number, the number of digits or number of identifiers in a suitable address space must be large enough to accommodate the value of the count detected. In binary, a single network interface may be represented by a single digit or bit. A count of seven network interfaces requires an identifier space that includes at least seven identifiers and at least some identifiers in the space require three digits or bits when represented in a binary or base two numeric representation. A schema may define and/or otherwise may be included in determining a constraint on the number of bits that may be used in representing an interface identifier.
In
A threshold condition may be based on size information defined by the schema for representing a protocol address in the valid data unit. The size information may identify at least one of a maximum size and minimum size for a valid representation of a protocol address in a data unit.
Determining an interface identifier space may include determining size information identifying at least one of a maximum size for an interface identifier. The maximum size may be based on the count, for an interface identifier; and determining the threshold condition based on the size information. The maximum size may be based on a schema rule.
Returning to
An ordering of interface identifiers in an identifier space may be determined based on a metric. The metric may be for measuring of any of various attributes accessible within an execution environment. Examples of metrics for interface identifiers are provided above in describing threshold conditions.
Further, an ordering of interface identifiers may correspond to an ordering of network interfaces. Interface identifiers may be assigned based on the correspondence. In an aspect, interface identifiers may be order based on a size of their respective representations in data units of a network protocol. For example, an interface identifier with the value 1 may be represented by a single bit in a data unit. An identifier with a value of ‘255’ may require 4 bits according to a particular type of representation. Network interfaces in a node may be ordered based on one or more of data units sent and/or received; bytes sent and/or received; types of data transmission media coupled to respective network interface; a measure of congestion; a measure of energy or power utilization; measure of heat; an attribute of specified protocol configured to communicate via the network interfaces; and a role of a next node included in a hop that includes a network interface.
Assigning an interface identifier to a first network interface in a first node may include receiving, via the first network interface, a message, sent via a second network interface in a second node, that includes criterion information to identify and/or assign an interface identifier. A criterion may be based on and/or may identify any of the measures described above. Assigning the interface identifier may further include determining that the first interface identifier meets the criterion. A threshold condition determined by an address space component may be determined based on such a criterion. The first interface identifier may be assigned to the first network interface in response to determining that the criterion is met by the first interface identifier.
In an aspect, a first node may receive data from a second node in a data unit of a network protocol via a first network interface. The first network interface may have an assigned first interface identifier. The data may be received based on a protocol address of the network protocol that includes the first interface identifier. The protocol address may identify a third node. In an aspect, the protocol address may include a second interface identifier. The second interface identifier may be assigned to identify a second network interface in the first node. The first node may transmit the data to the third node via the second network interface identified by the second interface identifier in the protocol address. In another aspect, the protocol address may include a third interface identifier assigned to a third network interface in the third node. The third network interface may be included in communicatively coupling the first node and the third node via the second network interface in the first node. In an aspect, the first node may transmit the data to the third node via the second network interface based on an association between the third interface identifier and the second network interface.
In another aspect, a first node may receive a message via a second network interface in the first node. The message may be from a second node in a network path that includes the second network interface. The message may include and/or may be received in one or more data units that include and/or identify a protocol address of a network protocol of the message or of the data units that include the message. The network protocol includes a first interface identifier assigned to a first network interface in the first node. The first node identifies the first network interface based on the first interface identifier in the protocol address. In response, the first node may send the message to a third node in a network path from the first node, where the network path includes the first network interface. The protocol address may be a valid address according to the network protocol of the third node. Alternatively, the third node may be a node in a network path to a destination node identified by the protocol address.
As described in the previous paragraph, a hop may be assigned an identifier that is shared by the pair of nodes in the hop. In still another aspect, a first-second protocol address may indicate a first ordering of the first interface identifier and the second interface identifier. The first-second protocol address may identify the second node to the first node based on the first ordering. A second-first protocol address may include and/or otherwise indicate a second ordering of the first interface identifier. The second-first protocol address may identify the first node to the second node based on the second ordering.
In an additional aspect, the method illustrated in
The method illustrated in
In another aspect a count may be detected by a count component based on whether a network interface in the region is in a node configured to at least one of send and receive a data unit specified according to a network protocol.
An address space condition component may determine a threshold condition based on an interface identifier space to identify a protocol endpoint of a network protocol. Determining the threshold condition may include determining, based on the count, a maximum count of interface identifiers in the interface identifier space
Further, a threshold condition may be based on a metric to measure an address portion of a data unit, of a network protocol, in a data transmission when transmitted via a data transmission medium. The threshold condition may be based on a metric to measure a size of an interface identifier in a protocol address when stored in the address portion.
In a further aspect identifying an interface identifier may include identifying an interface identifier space based on a threshold condition. The interface identifier interface identifier may be selected from the interface identifier space for assigning to a network interface.
In another aspect a first node may receive data, from a second node via a first network interface, in a data unit including a protocol address, of a protocol endpoint of a network protocol, that includes a first interface identifier of the first network interface. The protocol address may be a valid identifier of a third node that is included in a network path that includes a second network interface in the first node. The first node may send the data to the third node via the second network interface. The protocol address includes a second interface identifier assigned to identify the second network interface.
An interface identifier may be assigned to a first network interface in a first region in a node including a second network interface in a second region of a network. Assigning the first network interface may include determining that the first interface identifier is the smallest available interface identifier.
The present application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 16/264,580 filed Jan. 31, 2019 and entitled “Routing Methods, Systems, and Computer Program Products” which, in turn, is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 15/961,818 filed Apr. 24, 2018 and entitled “Routing Methods, Systems, and Computer Program Products” which, in turn, is a continuation-in-part of U.S. application Ser. No. 14/274,632 filed May 9, 2014 and entitled “Methods, Systems, and Computer Program Products for Associating a Name with a Network Path” (US 2014-0365682 A1) which, in turn, is a continuation-in-part of: U.S. application Ser. No. 13/727,662 filed Dec. 27, 2012 and entitled “Methods, Systems, and Computer Program Products for Routing Based on a Path-Based Protocol Address” (US 2014-0189156 A1); U.S. application Ser. No. 13/727,651 filed Dec. 27, 2012 and entitled “Methods, Systems, and Computer Program Products for Routing Based on a Nested Protocol Address” (US 2014-0189045 A1); U.S. application Ser. No. 13/727,652 filed Dec. 27, 2012 and entitled “Methods, Systems, and Computer Program Products for Routing Based on a Scope-Specific Address” (US 2014-0189153 A1); U.S. application Ser. No. 13/727,653 filed Dec. 27, 2012 and entitled “Methods, Systems, and Computer Program Products for Identifying a Protocol Address in a Scope-Specific Address Space” (US 2014-0189159 A1); U.S. application Ser. No. 13/727,655 filed Dec. 27, 2012 and entitled “Methods, Systems, and Computer Program Products for Determining a Shared Identifier for a Hop in a Network” (US 2014-0189154 A1); and U.S. application Ser. No. 13/727,657 filed Dec. 27, 2012 and entitled “Methods, Systems, and Computer Program Products for Determining a Protocol Address For a Node” (US 2014-0189155 A1). Further, the present application incorporates by reference the following applications by reference in their entirety for all purposes: U.S. application Ser. No. 13/727,662 filed Dec. 27, 2012 and entitled “Methods, Systems, and Computer Program Products for Routing Based on a Path-Based Protocol Address” (US 2014-0189156 A1); U.S. application Ser. No. 13/727,651 filed Dec. 27, 2012 and entitled “Methods, Systems, and Computer Program Products for Routing Based on a Nested Protocol Address” (US 2014-0189045 A1); U.S. application Ser. No. 13/727,652 filed Dec. 27, 2012 and entitled “Methods, Systems, and Computer Program Products for Routing Based on a Scope-Specific Address” (US 2014-0189153 A1); U.S. application Ser. No. 13/727,653 filed Dec. 27, 2012 and entitled “Methods, Systems, and Computer Program Products for Identifying a Protocol Address in a Scope-Specific Address Space” (US 2014-0189159 A1); U.S. application Ser. No. 13/727,655 filed Dec. 27, 2012 and entitled “Methods, Systems, and Computer Program Products for Determining a Shared Identifier for a Hop in a Network” (US 2014-0189154 A1); and U.S. application Ser. No. 13/727,657 filed Dec. 27, 2012 and entitled “Methods, Systems, and Computer Program Products for Determining a Protocol Address For a Node” (US 2014-0189155 A1).
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5195181 | Bryant et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5353283 | Tsuchiya | Oct 1994 | A |
5426639 | Follett et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5452293 | Wilkinson et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5504747 | Sweazey | Apr 1996 | A |
5649108 | Spiegel et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5764624 | Endo et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5845086 | Doebrich et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5968124 | Takahashi et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
6032197 | Birdwell et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6205429 | Peng | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6374303 | Armitage et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6574195 | Roberts | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6577600 | Bare | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6631484 | Born | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6647428 | Bannai et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6650640 | Muller et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6675218 | Mahler et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6728220 | Behzadi | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6765921 | Stacey | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6816460 | Ahmed et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6963570 | Agarwal | Nov 2005 | B1 |
6990108 | Karlsson et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6996126 | Deml et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7012919 | So et al. | Mar 2006 | B1 |
7023846 | Andersson et al. | Apr 2006 | B1 |
7031253 | Katukam et al. | Apr 2006 | B1 |
7031607 | Smith | Apr 2006 | B1 |
7047114 | Rogers | May 2006 | B1 |
7061921 | Sheth | Jun 2006 | B1 |
7065040 | Nagamine | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7068654 | Joseph et al. | Jun 2006 | B1 |
7072346 | Hama | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7082140 | Hass | Jul 2006 | B1 |
7088721 | Droz et al. | Aug 2006 | B1 |
7154416 | Savage | Dec 2006 | B1 |
7174387 | Shand et al. | Feb 2007 | B1 |
7174390 | Schulter et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7177311 | Hussain et al. | Feb 2007 | B1 |
7180887 | Schwaderer et al. | Feb 2007 | B1 |
7181742 | Hooper | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7254138 | Sandstrom | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7260097 | Casey | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7269132 | Casey et al. | Sep 2007 | B1 |
7286479 | Bragg | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7286566 | Parruck et al. | Oct 2007 | B1 |
7315541 | Housel et al. | Jan 2008 | B1 |
7330440 | Bryant et al. | Feb 2008 | B1 |
7340535 | Alam | Mar 2008 | B1 |
7359377 | Kompella | Apr 2008 | B1 |
7366865 | Lakshmanamurthy et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7373401 | Azad | May 2008 | B1 |
7403542 | Thompson | Jul 2008 | B1 |
7420992 | Fang et al. | Sep 2008 | B1 |
7430210 | Havala et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7460473 | Kodama et al. | Dec 2008 | B1 |
7462639 | Georges et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7463639 | Rekhter | Dec 2008 | B1 |
7466661 | Previdi et al. | Dec 2008 | B1 |
7471669 | Sabesan et al. | Dec 2008 | B1 |
7529224 | Basso et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7551632 | Thubert et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7564803 | Minei et al. | Jul 2009 | B1 |
7577143 | Kompella | Aug 2009 | B1 |
7602778 | Guichard et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7610330 | Quinn et al. | Oct 2009 | B1 |
7619982 | Blair et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7636299 | Asa et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7660892 | Choong et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7673072 | Boucher et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7675861 | Metzger et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7706306 | Bardalai et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7773630 | Huang et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7782834 | Chitrapu | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7787361 | Rahman et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7813356 | Roberts | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7817667 | Frederiksen et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7835393 | Ren et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7885259 | Filsfils | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7885294 | Patel et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7894352 | Kompella et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7894458 | Jiang et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7933272 | Morris | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7940695 | Bahadur et al. | May 2011 | B1 |
7944853 | Eglin et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7970931 | Ventakaramaiah et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7983174 | Monaghan et al. | Jul 2011 | B1 |
8000267 | Solis et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8004967 | Wang | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8028298 | Moore | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8064441 | Wijnands et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8065439 | Johnson et al. | Nov 2011 | B1 |
8068417 | Roberts | Nov 2011 | B1 |
8073968 | Shah et al. | Dec 2011 | B1 |
8248920 | Tallet | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8248969 | Yan | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8254272 | Vasseur | Aug 2012 | B1 |
8259585 | P et al. | Sep 2012 | B1 |
8275313 | Myers et al. | Sep 2012 | B1 |
8301738 | Alex | Oct 2012 | B1 |
8310957 | Rekhter | Nov 2012 | B1 |
8339973 | Pichumani et al. | Dec 2012 | B1 |
8380846 | Abu-Ghazaleh et al. | Feb 2013 | B1 |
8422514 | Kothari et al. | Apr 2013 | B1 |
8456987 | Valluri et al. | Jun 2013 | B1 |
8509056 | Arya et al. | Aug 2013 | B1 |
8537840 | Raszuk et al. | Sep 2013 | B1 |
8542706 | Wang et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8611335 | Wu et al. | Dec 2013 | B1 |
8619817 | Everson et al. | Dec 2013 | B1 |
8630167 | Smith | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8631483 | Soni et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8675488 | Sidebottom et al. | Mar 2014 | B1 |
8693341 | Rajamanickam et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8705533 | Venkatraman et al. | Apr 2014 | B1 |
8711883 | Kang et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8724627 | Filsfils et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
8743679 | Gerstel et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8751686 | Filsfils et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8762532 | Kohlenz et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8792384 | Banerjee et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8798047 | Wadekar et al. | Aug 2014 | B1 |
8813220 | Knapp et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8825900 | Gross et al. | Sep 2014 | B1 |
8831025 | Finney et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8838705 | Zwaal et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8867363 | Mohapatra et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8873409 | Filsfils et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8891532 | Smith et al. | Nov 2014 | B1 |
8892772 | Filsfils et al. | Nov 2014 | B1 |
8908517 | Filsfils et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8913613 | Srinivasan et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8948179 | Zhao et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
8953590 | Aggarwal et al. | Feb 2015 | B1 |
8982710 | Meilik et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
9014049 | Filsfils et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9015299 | Shah | Apr 2015 | B1 |
9030934 | Shah et al. | May 2015 | B2 |
9036463 | Bashandy et al. | May 2015 | B2 |
9036474 | Dibirdi et al. | May 2015 | B2 |
9049233 | Frost et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9065750 | Vasseur et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9094335 | Subramanian et al. | Jul 2015 | B2 |
9112734 | Edwards et al. | Aug 2015 | B2 |
9118572 | Sajassi et al. | Aug 2015 | B2 |
9124652 | Jain et al. | Sep 2015 | B1 |
9143395 | Bashandy et al. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9178796 | Previdi et al. | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9178805 | Goel | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9185022 | Vasseur et al. | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9197508 | Vasseur et al. | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9231726 | Lee et al. | Jan 2016 | B2 |
9253041 | Previdi et al. | Feb 2016 | B2 |
9258174 | Gerstel et al. | Feb 2016 | B1 |
9282031 | Liu et al. | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9300584 | Filsfils et al. | Mar 2016 | B1 |
9319312 | Filsfils et al. | Apr 2016 | B2 |
9369371 | Filsfils et al. | Jun 2016 | B2 |
9369387 | Filsfils et al. | Jun 2016 | B2 |
9391704 | Gerstel et al. | Jul 2016 | B2 |
9401858 | Francois et al. | Jul 2016 | B2 |
9444677 | Kumar et al. | Sep 2016 | B2 |
9462043 | Frost et al. | Oct 2016 | B2 |
9479403 | Filsfils et al. | Oct 2016 | B2 |
9491686 | Bosch et al. | Nov 2016 | B2 |
9503363 | Sivabalan et al. | Nov 2016 | B2 |
9525619 | Filsfils et al. | Dec 2016 | B2 |
9544232 | Srinivasan et al. | Jan 2017 | B2 |
9548959 | Boutros et al. | Jan 2017 | B2 |
9559954 | Filsfils et al. | Jan 2017 | B2 |
9565160 | Previdi et al. | Feb 2017 | B2 |
9571349 | Previdi et al. | Feb 2017 | B2 |
9590850 | Filsfils et al. | Mar 2017 | B2 |
9634867 | Lee et al. | Apr 2017 | B2 |
9634924 | Filsfils et al. | Apr 2017 | B2 |
9634929 | Boutros et al. | Apr 2017 | B2 |
9647944 | Filsfils et al. | May 2017 | B2 |
9660897 | Gredler | May 2017 | B1 |
9698910 | Filsfils et al. | Jul 2017 | B2 |
9705815 | Mattson et al. | Jul 2017 | B2 |
9749227 | Frost et al. | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9780909 | Wood et al. | Oct 2017 | B2 |
9813333 | Zhao et al. | Nov 2017 | B2 |
9825845 | Wang et al. | Nov 2017 | B2 |
9825856 | Yong et al. | Nov 2017 | B2 |
9832115 | Cai et al. | Nov 2017 | B2 |
9847939 | Patel et al. | Dec 2017 | B2 |
9858241 | Srinivasan et al. | Jan 2018 | B2 |
9912577 | Filsfils et al. | Mar 2018 | B2 |
9929946 | Filsfils et al. | Mar 2018 | B2 |
9942057 | Bryant et al. | Apr 2018 | B2 |
9979601 | Filsfils et al. | May 2018 | B2 |
9979629 | Sivabalan et al. | May 2018 | B2 |
10063475 | Previdi et al. | Aug 2018 | B2 |
10142160 | Adams et al. | Nov 2018 | B1 |
10212076 | Morris | Feb 2019 | B1 |
10382334 | Previdi et al. | Aug 2019 | B2 |
20010037401 | Soumiya et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010040895 | Templin | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010052053 | Nemirovsky et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020057651 | Roberts | May 2002 | A1 |
20020057699 | Roberts | May 2002 | A1 |
20020080786 | Roberts | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020099856 | Shitama | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020101868 | Clear et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020103631 | Feldmann et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020103732 | Bundy et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020176371 | Behzadi | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020191541 | Buchanan | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030016678 | Maeno | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030026271 | Erb et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030039212 | Lloyd et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030058790 | Nagamine | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030099194 | Lee | May 2003 | A1 |
20030099203 | Rajan et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030118051 | Ooms | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030126272 | Corl et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030133412 | Iyer et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030142674 | Casey | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030142685 | Bare | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030179742 | Ogier | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030231634 | Henderson et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040032856 | Sandstrom | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040160958 | Oh | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040174879 | Basso et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040196840 | Amrutur et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040196854 | Thubert et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040202158 | Takeno et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040218535 | Liong | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040219922 | Gage et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040240442 | Grimminger et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040249951 | Grabelsky et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050066017 | Bogia | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050071130 | Benjamin et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050073958 | Atlas et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050105515 | Reed et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050174998 | Vesterinen et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050213513 | Ngo et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050232303 | Deforche et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050240943 | Smith et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050259586 | Hatid et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050259655 | Cuervo et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060002304 | Ashwood-Smith | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060013209 | Somasundaram | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060039364 | Wright | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060039371 | Castro et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060045088 | Nguyen | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060056397 | Aizu et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060075134 | Aalto | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060080421 | Hu | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060092940 | Ansari et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060126272 | Horio et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060146696 | Li et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060182034 | Klinker et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060187817 | Charzinski et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060215544 | Asa et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060239199 | Blair | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060239201 | Metzger et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060262735 | Guichard et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060274716 | Oswal et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070019647 | Roy et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070053342 | Sierecki et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070058638 | Guichard et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070064715 | Lloyd et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070112975 | Cassar | May 2007 | A1 |
20070133406 | Vasseur | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070147363 | Oswal et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070171825 | Roberts et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070171826 | Roberts et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070189291 | Tian | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070230362 | Bardalai et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070237160 | Natarajan et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070245034 | Retana et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20080002699 | Rajsic | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080025203 | Tallet | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080034116 | Li et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080037117 | Seki et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080075016 | Ashwood-Smith | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080075117 | Tanaka | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080084881 | Dharwadkar et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080101227 | Fujita et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080101239 | Goode | May 2008 | A1 |
20080101367 | Weinman | May 2008 | A1 |
20080172497 | Mohan et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080189393 | Wagner | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080192762 | Kompella et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080212465 | Yan | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080225864 | Aissaoui et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080253367 | Ould-Brahim | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080259820 | White et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080279201 | Lu et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090041038 | Martini et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090049194 | Csaszar et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090067445 | Diguet et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090080431 | Rekhter | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090135815 | Pacella | May 2009 | A1 |
20090141721 | Filsfils | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090161576 | Morris | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090175274 | Aggarwal et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090213858 | Dolganow et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090252161 | Morris | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090285101 | Lu | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090290486 | Wang | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090296710 | Agrawal | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090310481 | Deng et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090323694 | Miki et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090323696 | Schwan et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100010975 | Morris | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100010992 | Morris | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100011048 | Morris | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100014424 | Agrawal et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100063983 | Groarke et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100088717 | Candelore et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100103937 | O'Neil | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100124220 | Morris | May 2010 | A1 |
20100124231 | Kompella | May 2010 | A1 |
20100128628 | Wu et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100142401 | Morris | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100142548 | Sheth | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100145602 | Morris | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100145963 | Morris | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100146132 | Morris | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100161732 | Morris | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100195516 | McReynolds et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100202455 | Sundaram et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100220739 | Ishiguro | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100232435 | Jabr et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100241742 | Douceur et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100250777 | Morris | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100265943 | Dong et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100272110 | Allan et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100284309 | Allan et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100290480 | Westphal et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20110007670 | Yan | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110060844 | Allan et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110063986 | Denecheau et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110090913 | Kim et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110216779 | Peterson et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110228780 | Ashwood-Smith et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110261722 | Awano | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110268114 | Wijnands et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110273980 | Smith | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110280123 | Wijnands et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110286326 | Awano | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110286452 | Balus et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20120044944 | Kotha et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120063526 | Xiao et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120069740 | Lu et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120069845 | Carney et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120075988 | Lu et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120076014 | Bragg | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120082034 | Vasseur | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120092986 | Chen | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120106560 | Gumaste | May 2012 | A1 |
20120120808 | Nandagopal et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120120959 | Krause | May 2012 | A1 |
20120147768 | Johnsson et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120163180 | Goel | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120163384 | Takase | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120170461 | Long | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120179796 | Nagaraj et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120213225 | Subramanian et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120218884 | Kini et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120236860 | Kompella et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120239799 | Wang et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120287818 | Corti et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120307629 | Vasseur | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130003728 | Kwong et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130051237 | Ong | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130058345 | Kano | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130077476 | Enyedi et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130077624 | Keesara et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130077625 | Khera et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130077626 | Keesara et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130114402 | Ould-Brahim et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130142052 | Burbidge et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130188634 | Magee | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130219034 | Wang et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130227108 | Dunbar et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130232193 | Ali et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130250809 | Hui et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130258842 | Mizutani | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130266012 | Dutta et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130266013 | Dutta et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130322248 | Guo | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130343204 | Geib et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140003425 | Zhao et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140010083 | Hamdi et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140056300 | Zhao et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140067911 | Block et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140098675 | Frost et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140160925 | Xu et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140169370 | Filsfils et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140173078 | McCord | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140185618 | Perlman et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140189045 | Morris | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140189081 | Morris | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140189152 | Morris | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140189153 | Morris | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140189154 | Morris | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140189155 | Morris | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140189156 | Morris | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140189159 | Morris | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140192677 | Chew et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140198634 | Kumar et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140204946 | Li | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140211794 | Frost et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140215087 | Zhao et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140233385 | Beliveau et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140254596 | Filsfils et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140269266 | Filsfils et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140269421 | Previdi et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140269422 | Filsfils et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140269698 | Filsfils et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140269699 | Filsfils et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140269721 | Bashandy et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140269725 | Filsfils et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140269727 | Filsfils et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140286195 | Fedyk | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140317259 | Previdi et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140328207 | Agrawal et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140341222 | Filsfils et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140369356 | Bryant et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150003455 | Haddad et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150003458 | Li et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150003463 | Li et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150023328 | Thubert et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150109902 | Kumar | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150156035 | Foo et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150188804 | Ashwood-Smith | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150195197 | Yong et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150200843 | Frost et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150207671 | Farkas et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150236959 | Cai et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150256456 | Previdi et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150263940 | Kini et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150271066 | Frost et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150271102 | Antich | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150326473 | Dunbar et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20150326675 | Kini et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20150381406 | Francois et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160006614 | Zhao | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160021000 | Previdi et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160028640 | Zhang et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160173366 | Saad et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160191372 | Zhang et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160254987 | Eckert et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160254988 | Eckert et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160254991 | Eckert et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160352629 | Wang et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160352654 | Filsfils et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160373317 | Ali et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20170005877 | Papadimitriou | Jan 2017 | A1 |
20170019330 | Filsfils et al. | Jan 2017 | A1 |
20170041223 | Akashi | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170048138 | Sivabalan et al. | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170064717 | Filsfils et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170104673 | Bashandy et al. | Apr 2017 | A1 |
20170111261 | Francois et al. | Apr 2017 | A1 |
20170111277 | Previdi et al. | Apr 2017 | A1 |
20170230274 | Filsfils et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170302561 | Filsfils et al. | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20170302571 | Frost et al. | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20170324497 | Ruffini et al. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20170324654 | Previdi et al. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20170331672 | Fedyk et al. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20170346718 | Psenak et al. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20170346737 | Previdi et al. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20170366453 | Previdi et al. | Dec 2017 | A1 |
20180034728 | Filsfils et al. | Feb 2018 | A1 |
20180041420 | Saad et al. | Feb 2018 | A1 |
20180083871 | Filsfils et al. | Mar 2018 | A1 |
20180109450 | Filsfils et al. | Apr 2018 | A1 |
20180131616 | LaBerge et al. | May 2018 | A1 |
20180302320 | Aranha et al. | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20190349303 | Previdi et al. | Nov 2019 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1726679 | Jan 2006 | CN |
101247253 | Aug 2008 | CN |
101399688 | Apr 2009 | CN |
101496357 | Jul 2009 | CN |
101803293 | Aug 2010 | CN |
101841442 | Sep 2010 | CN |
101616466 | Dec 2010 | CN |
102098222 | Jun 2011 | CN |
102132533 | Jul 2011 | CN |
102299852 | Dec 2011 | CN |
102498694 | Jun 2012 | CN |
101931548 | Sep 2012 | CN |
102714625 | Oct 2012 | CN |
2974164 | Jan 2016 | EP |
2974176 | Jan 2016 | EP |
2009018728 | Feb 2009 | WO |
2015063618 | May 2015 | WO |
2015094296 | Jun 2015 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Reconsideration After Non-Final Rejection dated Apr. 9, 2019 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/153,114. |
Reconsideration After Non-Final Rejection dated May 17, 2019 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/264,580. |
Reconsideration After Non-Final Rejection dated May 20, 2019 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/264,580. |
Rekhter et al.,“Carrying Label Information in BGP-4,” Request for Comments 3107, the Internet Society, May 2001, 8 pages. |
Rekhter, et. al, “Application of the Border Gateway Protocol in the Internet”, RFC 1268, pp. 1-13, Internet Engineering Task Force, http://tools.ietf.org/rfc/rfc1268.txt, Oct. 1991. |
Rekhter, Y. et al (ed), “A Border Gateway Protocol 4 {BGP-4)”, RFC 4271, pp. 1-104, Internet Engineering Task Force, http://tools.ietf.org/rfc/rfc4271.txt, Jan. 2006. |
Response to Final Office Action dated Apr. 30, 2019 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/153,050. |
Roberts, Lawrence, “A Radical New Router”, IEEE Spectrum, Jul. 2009, pp. 1-6. |
Rosen et al. “Multiprotocol Label Switching Architecture,” RFC 3031, Jan. 2001, 61 pages. |
Rosen et al., “BGP/MPLS IP Virtual Private Networks (VPNs),” Network Working Group, RFC 4364, Standards Track, Feb. 2006, 47 pages; https://tools.ietf.org/pdf/rfc4364.pdf. |
Rosen et al., “BGP/MPLS VPNs”, Cisco Systems, Inc., Network Working Group, Request for Comments: 2547; Mar. 1999, pp. 1-25. |
Sivabalan et al., “PCE-Initiated Traffic Engineering Path Setup in Segment Routed Networks; draft-sivabalan-pcesegmentrouting-00,” Internet Engineering Task Force, IETF, Standard Working Draft, Internet Society (ISOC) 4, Rue Des Falaises CH-1205, Geneva, Switzerland, Jun. 2013, pp. 1-16. |
Steenstrup, M., “Inter-Domain Policy Routing Protocol Specification: Version 1”, RFC 1479, pp. 1-108, Internet Engineering Task Force, http://tools.ietf.org/rfc/rfc1479.txt, Jul. 1993. |
Tian et al., “Source Routed MPLS LSP Using Domain Wide Label,” draft-tian-mpls-lsp-source-route-01.txt, Redback Networks, Network Working Group, Internet Draft, Jul. 2004, pp. 1-12. |
Vasseur et al., “A Link-Type Sub-TLV to Convey the Number of Traffic Engineering Label Switched Paths Signaled with Zero Reserved Bandwidth Across a Link,” Cisco Systems, Inc., Network Working Group, Request for Comments 5330, Oct. 2008, 16 pages. |
Vasseur et al., “Path Computation Element (PCE) Communication Protocol (PCEP) Request for Comments: 5440,” Cisco Systems, Internet Engineering Task Force, IETF, Standard, Internet Society (ISOC) 4, Rue Des Falaises CH-1205, Geneva, Switzerland, chapters 4-8, Mar. 2009, pp. 1-87. |
Waitzman, D., et al, “Distance Vector Multicast Routing Protocol”, RFC 1075, pp. 1-24, Internet Engineering Task Force, http://tools.ietf.org/rfc/rfc1075.txt, Nov. 1988. |
Wang et al., “Research and Implementation of a Scalable Secure Active Network Node”, Proceedings of the First International Conference on Machine Learning and Cybernetics, IEEE, Nov. 2002, pp. 111-115. |
Wetherall et al., “The Active IP Option,” Proceedings of the 7th Workshop of ACM SIGOPS Systems Support for Worldwide Applications, Sep. 1996, pp. 33-40. |
Wijnands et al., “Multicast Extensions for LDP,” Cisco Systems, Inc., Yuji Kamite and Hitoshi Fukuda, NTT Communications, Network Working Group; Internet Draft; Mar. 2005, pp. 1-12. |
Abandonment Jun. 24, 2019 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/961,832. |
Abley. J .. et al. ““Deprecation of Type 0 Routing Headers in IPv6””. RFCC 5095. pp. 1-7. Internet Engineering Task Force. http://tools.ietf.org/rfc/rfc5095.txt. Dec. 2007. |
Advisory_Action_dated_Sep. 17, 2019_for_U.S. Appl. No. 16/195,830. |
Aggarwal et al., “MPLS Upstream Label Assignment and Context Specific Label Space,” Network Working Group, FRC 5331, Aug. 2008, 13 pages. |
Akiya et al., “Seamless Bidirectional Forwarding Detection (BFD) for Segment Routing (SR),” draft-akiyabfd-seamless-sr-01, Internet Engineering Task Force, Internet-Draft, Dec. 5, 2013, 7 pages. |
Akiya et al., “Seamless Bidirectional Forwarding Detection (BFD) for Segment Routing (SR),” draft-akiyabfd-seamless-sr-02, Internet Engineering Task Force, Internet-Draft, Jun. 7, 2014, 7 pages. |
Akiya et al., “Seamless Bidirectional Forwarding Detection (BFD) for Segment Routing (SR),” draft-akiyabfd-seamless-sr-03, Internet Engineering Task Force, Internet-Draft, Aug. 23, 2014, 7 pages. |
Akiya et al., “Seamless Bidirectional Forwarding Detection (BFD) for Segment Routing (SR),” draft-akiyabfd-seamless-sr-04, Internet Engineering Task Force, Internet-Draft, Feb. 23, 2015, 7 pages. |
Akiya et al., “Seamless Bidirectional Forwarding Detection (BFD) for Segment Routing (SR),” draft-akiyabfdseamless-sr-00, Internet Engineering Task Force, Internet-Draft, Jun. 7, 2013, 7 pages. |
Akiya, N., “Segment Routing Implications on BFD,” Sep. 9, 2013, 2 pages. |
Alcatel-Lucent, “Segment Routing and Path Computation Element—Using Traffic Engineering to Optimize Path Placement and Efficiency in IP/MPLS Networks,” Technology White Paper, 2015, 28 pages. |
Aldrin et al., “Seamless Bidirectional Forwarding Detection (S-BFD) Use Cases,” draft-ietf-bfd-seamlessuse-case-08, Network Working Group, Internet-Draft, May 6, 2016, 15 pages. |
Almquist, P., “Type of Service in the Internet Protocol Suite”, RFC 1349, pp. 1-28, Internet Engineering Task Force, http://lools.ielf.org/rfc/rfc1349. lxl, Jul. 1992. |
Awduche et al., “Overview and Principles of Internet Traffic Engineering,” Network Working Group, Request for Comments, 3272, May 2002, pp. 1-71. |
Awduche et al., “Requirements for Traffic Engineering Over MPLS,” Network Working Group, Request for Comments, 2702, Sep. 1999, pp. 1-29. |
Awduche et al., “RSVP-TE: Extensions to RSVP for LSP Tunnels,” Network Working Group, Internet-Draft, Feb. 2001, pp. 1-12. |
Awduche et al., “RSVP-TE: Extensions to RSVP for LSP Tunnels,” Network Working Group, RFC 3209, Dec. 2001, pp. 1-61. |
Backes et al., “Deutsche Telekom AG's Statement About IPR Related to Draft-Geig-Spring-OAM-Usecase-01,” Aug. 23, 2012, pp. 1-2. |
Backes et al., “Deutsche Telekom AG's Statement About IPR Related to Draft-Geig-Spring-OAM-Usecase-01,” Feb. 5, 2014, pp. 1-2. |
Baker, F. (ed), “Requirements for IP Version 4 Routers”, RFC 1812, pp. 1-175, Internet Engineering Task Force, http://tools.ietf.org/rfc/rfc1812.txt, Jun. 1995. |
Bates et al., “Multiprotocol Extensions for BGP-4,” Network Working Group, RFC 4760, Standards Track, Jan. 2007, 47 pages; https://tools.ietf.org/pdf/rfc4760.pdf. |
Begtasevic, F. et al. “Measurements of the Hopcount in Internet,” Delft University of Technology, Information Technology and Systems, 7 pages. |
Bergkvist, J., et al, “Boomerang—a Simple Resource Reservation Framework for IP”, drafl-ietf-manet-cbrp-spec-01.txt, pp. 1-15, Internet Engineering Task Force.http ://tools.ietf.org/html/drafl-ietf-manet-cbrp-spec-01.txt, Nov. 2000. |
Bryant et al., “IP Fast Reroute Using Tunnels-draft-bryant-ipfrr-tunnels-03,” Cisco Systems, Network Working Group, Internet-Draft, Nov. 16, 2007, pp. 1-30. |
Bryant et al., “Remote LFA FRR,” Cisco Systems, draft-ieff-rtgwg-remote-lfa-04, Network Working Group, Internet-Draft, Nov. 22, 2013, pp. 1-24. |
Chandranmenon, Girish and Varghese, George. “Trading Packet Headers for Packet Processing,” Sigcomm, 1995. |
Chroboczek, J., “The Babel Routing Protocol”, RFC 6126, pp. 1-45, Internet Engineering Task Force, http://tools.ietf_ org/rfc/rfc6126. txt, Apr. 2011. |
Cisco Systems, Inc., “Introduction to Intermediate System-to-Intermediate System Protocol,” published 1992-2002; pp. 1-25. |
Clausen,T. et al {ed), “Optimized Link State Routing Protocol {OSLR)”, RFC 3626, pp. 1-75, Internet Engineering Task Force, http://tools.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3626.txt, Oct. 2003. |
Colton, R., et al, “OSPF for IPv6”, RFC 2740, pp. 1-80, Internet Engineering Task Force, http:fftools.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2740.txt, Dec. 1999. |
Crabbe et al., “PCEP Extensions for MPLS-TE LSP Protection With Stateful PCE Draft-Crabbe-PCE-Stateful-PCE-Protection-00,” Network Working Group, Internet-Draft, Oct. 2012, pp. 1-12. |
Crabbe et al., “PCEP Extensions for MPLS-TE LSP Protection With Stateful PCE Draft-Crabbe-PCE-Stateful-PCTProtection-04,” Network Working Group, Internet-Draft, May 8, 2013, pp. 1-54. |
Crabbe et al., Stateful PCE Extensions for MPLS-TE LSPs, draft-crabbe-pce-stateful-pce-mpls-te-00, Network Working Group, Internet-Draft, Oct. 15, 2012, pp. 1-15. |
Crabbe et al., “Stateful PCE Extensions for MPLS-TE LSPs,” draft-crabbe-pce-statement-pce-mpls-te-01, Network Working Group, Internet-Draft, May 8, 2013, pp. 1-11. |
Deering et al., “Internet Protocol, Version 6 (1Pv6) Specification,” Cisco, Network Working Group, Request for Comments 2460, Dec. 1998, pp. 1-39. |
Deering, S, et al, “Internet Protocol, Version 6, (IPv6) Specification”, RFC 2460, pp. 1-39, Internet Engineering Task Force (IEFT), http://tools.iefl.org/rfc/rfc2460. txt, Dec. 1998. |
Deering, S. (ed)., “ICMP Router Discovery Messages”, RFC 1256, pp. 1-19, Internet Engineering Task Force, http://tools. ielf. org/rfc/rfc1256. !xi, Sep. 1991. |
Deering, S. et al, “IPv6 Scoped Address Architecture” RFC 4007, Network Working Group, Mar. 2005, 24 pages. |
Dragos Niculescu, “Survey of Active Network Research”, Retrieved on Jul. 22, 2004, Jul. 1999, pp. 1-13. |
Eckert et al., “Traffic Engineering for Bit Index Explicit Replication BIER-TE, draft-eckert-bier-te-arch-01,” Network Working Group, Internet-Draft, Jul. 5, 2015, pp. 1-23. |
Eckert T., “Traffic Engineering for Bit Index Explicit Replication BIER-TE, draft-eckert-bier-te-arch-00,” Network Working Group, Internet-Draft, Mar. 5, 2015, pp. 1-21. |
Estrin, D. et al, “A Unified Approach to Inter-Domain Routing”, RFC 1322, pp. 1-38, Internet Engineering Task Force, http://lools.ielf.org/rfc/rfc1322.lxl, May 1992. |
Estrin, D. et al, “Source Demand Routing: Packet Format and Forwarding Specification (Version 1 ).”, RFC 1940, pp. 1-27, Internet Engineering Task Force, http://lools.ielf.org/rfc/rfc1940.lxl, May 1996. |
Farinacci et al., “Generic Routing Encapsulation (GRE),” Network Working Group, RFC 2784, Standards Track, Mar. 2000, 9 pages; https://tools.ietf.org/pdf/rfc2784.pdf. |
Carrel et al., “A Path Computation Element (PCE)-Based Architecture,” Old Dog Consulting, Network Working Group, Request for Comments 4655, Aug. 2006, pp. 1-80. |
Farrel et al., “Inter-Domain MPLS and GMPLS Traffic Enginerring—Resource Reservation Protocol—Traffic Enginerring (RSVP-TE) Extensions,” Old Dog Consulting, Newtork Working Group, Request for Comments 5151, Feb. 2008, pp. 1-25. |
Farrel, “Path Computation Element,” Presentation, 11th Annual International Conference on Next Generation Internet and Related Technologies MPLS 2008, Oct. 19-22, 2008, 57 pages. |
Fedyk et al., “Generalized Multiprotocol Label Switching (GMPLS) Control Ethernet Provider Backbone Traffic Engineering (PBB-TE),” Alcatel-Lucent, Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF), Request for Comments 6060, Mar. 2011, pp. 1-20. |
U.S. Appl. No. 61/710,121. |
U.S. Appl. No. 61/822,386. |
U.S. Appl. No. 61/822,978. |
U.S. Appl. No. 61/830,064. |
U.S. Appl. No. 61/831,932. |
U.S. Appl. No. 61/833,565. |
U.S. Appl. No. 61/897,234. |
U.S. Appl. No. 61/621,811. |
U.S. Appl. No. 61/729,119. |
Filsfils et al., “Segment Routing Architecture,” Cisco Systems, Inc., draft-filsfils-rtgwg-segment-routing-00, Jun. 28, 2013, pp. 1-28. |
Filsfils et al., “Segment Routing Architecture,” Cisco Systems, Inc., draft-filsfils-rtgwgsegment-routing-01, Network Working Group, Internet-Draft, Oct. 21, 2013, pp. 1-28. |
Filsfils et al., “Segment Routing Architecture,” Cisco Sytems, Inc., draft-filsfilsrtgwg-segment-routing-01, Network Working Group, Internet-Draft, Oct. 21, 2013, pp. 1-28. |
Filsfils et al., “Segment Routing Architecture,” draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-07, Network Working Group, Internet-Draft, Dec. 15, 2015, pp. 1-24. |
Filsfils et al., “Segment Routing Interoperability with LDP,” Cisco Systems, Inc., draft-filsfils-springsegment-routing-dp-interop-01; Apr. 18, 2014, pp. 1-16. |
Filsfils et al., “Segment Routing Interoperability with LDP,” Cisco Systems, Inc., draft-filsfils-spring-segment-routingldp-interop-01.txt, Apr. 18, 2014, pp. 1-16. |
Filsfils et al., “Segment Routing Use Cases,” draft-filsfils-rtgwg-segment-routing-use-cases-01, Network Working Group, Internet-Draft, Jul. 14, 2013, pp. 1-46. |
Filsfils et al., “Segment Routing Use Cases,” draft-filsfils-rtgwg-segment-routing-use-cases-02, Network Working Group, Internet-Draft, Oct. 21, 2013, pp. 1-36. |
Filsfils et al., “Segment Routing with MPLS Data Plane,” draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-mpls-05, Network Working Group, Internet-Draft, Jul. 6, 2016, 15 pages. |
Final Rejection dated Mar. 28, 2019 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/101,386. |
Final Rejection dated Jun. 13, 2019 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/153,114. |
Final Rejection dated Jun. 14, 2019 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/195,823. |
Final Rejection dated Jun. 17, 2019 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/195,827. |
Final Rejection dated Jul. 12, 2019 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/264,580. |
Final Rejection dated Jul. 22, 22019 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/195,830. |
Frost et aL, “MPLS Generic Associated Channel (G-Ach) Advertisement Protocol,” Cisco Systems, Inc., draft-ietfmpls-gach-adv-00, Internet-Draft, Jan. 27, 2012, pp. 1-17. |
Frost et al., “MPLS Generic Associated Channel (G-Ach) Advertisement Protocol,” Cisco Systems, Inc., draft-ietfmpls-gach-adv-08, Internet-Draft, Jun. 7, 2013, pp. 1-22. |
Frost et al., “MPLS Generic Associated Channel (G-Ach) Advertisement Protocol,” Cisco Systems, Inc., Request for Comments 7212, Jun. 2014, pp. 1-23. |
Fuller, V, et al, “Classless Inter-Domain Routing (CIDR): An Address Assignment and Aggregation Strategy”, RFC 1519, pp. 1-24, Internet Engineering Task Force (IEFT), http:l/tools.ieft.org/rfc/rfc1519.txt, Jun. 1999. |
Fuller, V. et al, “Classless Inter-Domain Routing (CIDR): an Address Assignment and Aggregation Strategy” RFC 1519, Network Working Group, CIDR Address Strategy, Sep. 1993, 24 pages. |
Geib, R., “Segment Routing Based OAM Use Case,” IETF 87, Berlin, Jul./Aug. 2013, pp. 1-3. |
Geib, R., “Use Case for a Scalable and Topology Aware MPLS data plan moniotoring System,” Deutsch Telekom, draft-geib-spring-oam-usecase-01, Internet-Draft, Feb. 5, 2014, pp. 1-10. |
Geib, R., “Use Case for a Scalable and Topology Aware MPLS data plan monitoring System,” Deutsch Telekom, draft-geib-spring-oam-usecase-00, Internet-Draft, Oct. 17, 2013, pp. 1-7. |
Gerla, M., et al, “Fisheye State Routing Protocol (FSR) for Ad Hoc Netvvorks”, draft-ietf-manet-fsr-03.txt, pp. 1-17, Internet Engineering Task Force,http:f/tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-manet-fsr-03.txt, Jun. 2002. |
Glenn, R. et al, “The NULL Encryption Algorithm and Its Use With Ipsec” RFC 2410, Network Working Group, Nov. 1998, 6 pages. |
Gredler et al., “Advertising MPLS Labels in IS-IS draftgredler-isis-label-advertisement-00,” Juniper Networks, Inc., Internet-Draft, Apr. 5, 2013, pp. 1-13. |
Gredler et al., “Advertising MPLS LSPs in the IGP,” hannes@juniper.net, IETF87, Berlin, draft-gredler-ospf-label-advertisement-03, May 21, 2013, pp. 1-17. |
Guilbaud, “Google-Localizing Packet Loss in a Large Complex Network,” Nicolas Guilbaud and Ross Cartlidge, Google Presentation, Feb. 5, 2013, pp. 1-43. |
Gupta, P. et al, “Routing Lookups in Hardware at Memory Access Speeds,” Computer Systems Laboratory, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305-9030, 8 pages. |
Halpern et al., “Service Function Chaining (SFC) Architecture—draft-ietf-sfc-architecture-09,” Network Workinq Group, Internet-Draft, Jun. 7, 2015, pp. 1-29. |
Hass, Z., et al, “The Interzone Routing Protocol (IERP) for Ad Hoc Networks”, draft-ietf-manet-zone-ierp-02.txt, pp. 1-14, Internet Engineering Task Force,http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-manet-zone-ierp-02.txt, Jul. 2002. |
Hedrick, C, “Routing Information Protoocl”, RFC 1058, pp. 1-33, Internet Engineering Task Force, http://tools.ietf.org/rfc/rfc1058.txt, Jun. 1988. |
Hinden et al “IPv6 Global Unicast Address Format” RFC 3587, Aug. 2003, 5 pages. |
Hinden, R. et al, “An IPv6 Aggregatable Global Unicast Address Format” RFC 2374, Network Working Group, Jul. 1998, 12 pages. |
Hinden, R. et al, “Internet Protocol Version 6 (IPv6) Addressing Architecture” RFC 3513, Network Working Group, Apr. 2003, 26 pages. |
Hinden, R. et al, “Internet Protocol Version 6 (IPv6) Addressing Architecture”, RFC 3513, pp. 1-26, Internet Engineering Task Force, http://tools.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3513.txt, Apr. 2003. |
Hinden, R., et al,, “Aggregatable Global Unicast Address Format”, RFC 2374, pp. 1-12, Internet Engineering Task Force, http:/tools.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2374, Jul. 1998. |
Housley, R., “Using Advanced Encryption Standard (AES) CCM Mode with IPsec Encapsulating Security Payload (ESP),” Network Working Group, RFC 4309, Standards Track, Dec. 2005, 13 pages; https://tools.ietf.org/pdf/rfc4309.pdf. |
Hu, Y., et al, “Flow State in Dynamic Source Routing Protocol for Mobile Ad Hoc Networks”, drafl-ietf-manet-dsrflow-00.txt, pp. 1-30, Internet Engineering Task Force,http://tools.ietf.org/html/drafl-ietf-manet-dsrflow-OO.txt, Feb. 2001. |
Hui. J .. et al. ““An IPv6 Routing Header for Source Routes with the Routing Protocol for Low-Power and Lossy Networks (RPL)””. RFC 6554. pp. 1-13. Internet Engineering Task Force. http://tools.ietf.org/rfc/rfc6554.txt. Mar. 2012. |
Imaizumi et al., “FMEHR: An Alternative Approach to Multi-Path Forwarding on Packed Switched Networks,” Networks, 2005, pp. 196-201. |
Jiang, M., et al, “Cluster Based Routing Protocol (CBR)”, ddrafl-ietf-manet-cbrp-spec-01.txt, pp. 1-27, Internet Engineering Task Force,http://tools.ietf.org/html/ddrafl-ietf-manet-cbrp-spec-01.txt, Aug. 1999. |
Johnson, D., et al, “The Dynamic Source Routing Protocol (DSR) for Mobile Ad Hoc Networks for IPv4”, RFC 4728, pp. 1-107, Internet Engineering Task Force, http://lools.ielf.org/rfc/rfc4728.lxl, Feb. 2007. |
Kent et al., “Security Architecture for the Internet Protocol,” Network Working Group, RFC 4301, Standards Track, Dec. 2005, 101 pages; https://tools.ietf.org/pdf/rfc4301.pdf. |
Kettaf, N., et al, “Admission Control enabled on demand Routing (ACOR)”, drafl-kettaf-manet-acor-03.txt pp. 1-24, Internet Engineering Task Force,http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-kettaf-manet-acor-03.txt, Oct. 2007. |
Kompella et al, “Label Switched Paths (LSP) Hierarchy with Generalized Multi-Protocol Label Switching (GMPLS) Traffic Enginerring (TE),” Juniper Networks, Network Working Group, Request for Comments 4206, Oct. 2005, pp. 1-14. |
Kompella et al., “Detecting Multi-Protocol Label Switched (MPLS) Data Plane Failures,” Juniper Networks, Inc., Network Working Group, Request for Comments 4379, Feb. 2006, pp. 1-50. |
Kompella et al., “Virtual Private LAN Service (VPLS) Using BGP for Auto-Discovery and Signaling,” Network Working Group, Request for Comments 4761, Juniper Networks, Jan. 2007, pp. 1-28. |
Kumar et al., “Label Switched Path (LSP) Ping/Trace for Segment Routing Networks Using MPLS Dataplane,” Cisco Systems, Inc., draft-kumar-mpls-spring-lsp-ping-00, Oct. 21, 2013, pp. 1-12. |
Kumar et al., “Label Switched Path (LSP) Ping/Trace for Segment Routing Networks Using MPLS Dataplane,” draft-ietf-mpls-spring-lsp-ping-00, Network Work Group, Internet Draft, May 10, 2016, 17 pages. |
Kumar et al., “Label Switched Path (LSP) Ping/Trace for Segment Routing Networks Using MPLS Dataplane,” draftkumarkini-mpls-spring-lsp-ping-00, Network Work Group, Internet-Draft, Jan. 2, 2014, pp. 1-15. |
Kumar et al., “OAM Requirements for Segment Routing Network,” draft-kumar-spring-sr-oam-requirement-00, Spring, Internet-Draft, Feb. 14, 2014, 6 pages. |
Kumar et al., “OAM Requirements for Segment Routing Network,” draft-kumar-spring-sr-oam-requirement-01, Spring; Internet-Draft, Jul. 1, 2014, 6 pages. |
Kumar et al., “OAM Requirements for Segment Routing Network,” draft-kumar-spring-sr-oam-requirement-02, Spring, Internet-Draft, Dec. 31, 2014, 6 pages. |
Kmar et al., “OAM Requirements for Segment Routing Network,” draft-kumar-spring-sr-oam-requirement-03, Spring, Internet-Draft, Mar. 9, 2015, 6 pages. |
Lauder, P. et al, “Hierarchical Network Routing,” Software Systems Research Group, Department of Computer Scient, University of Sydney, 13 pages, available at www.janeelix.com/piers/papers/Routing/routing.html. |
Li et al., “IS-IS Extensions for Traffic Engineering,” Redback Networks, Inc., Network Working Group, Request for Comments 5305, Oct. 2008, 17 pages. |
Li, T. T (ed), “Recommendataion for a Routing Architecture”, RFC 6115, pp. 1-73, Internet Engineering Task Force, httP:/ftools.ietf.org/rfc/rfc6115.txt, Feb. 2011. |
Lougheed, K., et al, (ed.),“A Border Gateway Protocol 3 (BGP-3)”, RFC 1267, pp. 1-35, Internet Engineering Task Force, http://tools.ietf.org/rfc/rfc1267.txt, Oct. 1991. |
Mahalingam et al., “Virtual eXtensible Local Area Network (VXLAN): A Framework for Overlaying Virtualized Layer 2 Networks over Layer 3 Networks,” Network Working Group, RFC 7348, Aug. 2014, 22 pages; https://tools.ietf.org/pdf/rfc7348.pdf. |
Metaswitch Networks, “PCE—an Evolutionary Approach to SDN,” Metaswitch Networks White Paper, 2010, 21 pages; http://www.metaswitch.com/sites/default/files/metaswitch-white-paper-pce-an-evolutionary-approach-to-sdn.pdf. |
Moy, J, “OSPF Version 2”, RFC 2328, pp. 1-13, Internet Engineering Task Force, http://tools.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2328.txt, Oct. 1991. |
Neumann, A., et al, “Better Approach to Mobile Ad-hoc Netvvorking (BAT.MAN.)”, draft-wunderlich-openmesh- manet-routing-00.txt pp. 1-24, Internet Engineering Task Force,http://tools.ietf.org/html/drafl-wunderlich-openmesh-manet-routing-003.txt, Apr. 2008. |
NOA_dated_Aug. 22, 2019_for_U.S. Appl. No. 16/153,262. |
NOA_dated_Aug. 26, 2019_for_U.S. Appl. No. 16/153,114. |
Non-Final Rejection filed Apr. 17, 2019 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/195,832. |
Non-Final Rejection dated Apr. 4, 2019 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/153,114. |
Non-Final Rejection dated May 6, 2019 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/264,580. |
Non-Final Rejection dated May 15, 2019 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/181,286. |
Non-Final Rejection dated Jun. 10, 2019 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/296,195. |
Non-Final Rejection dated Jun. 14, 2019 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/269,524. |
Non-Final Rejection dated Jul. 31, 2019 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/454,040. |
Non-Final Rejection dated Aug. 1, 2019 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/454,030. |
Non-Final Rejection dated Aug. 1, 2019 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/454,043. |
Non-Final_Rejection_dated_Sep. 12, 2019_for_U.S. Appl. No. 16/195,823. |
Notice of Allowance filed Mar. 29, 2019 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/101,382. |
Notice of Allowance filed Mar. 29, 2019 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/101,387. |
Notice of Allowance filed Apr. 17, 2019 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/153,146. |
Notice of Allowance filed Apr. 19, 2019 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/195,816. |
Notice of Allowance filed Apr. 12, 2019 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/101,386. |
Notice of Allowance dated Mar. 1, 2019 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/961,826. |
Notice of Allowance dated Mar. 7, 2019 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/961,832. |
Notice of Allowance dated Mar. 27, 2019 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/961,828. |
Notice of Allowance dated Apr. 17, 2019 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/153,146. |
Notice of Allowance dated Apr. 19, 2019 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/195,816. |
Notice of Allowance dated Apr. 25, 2019 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/153,223. |
Notice of Allowance dated Apr. 29, 2019 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/153,196. |
Notice of Allowance dated Apr. 30, 2019 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/961,826. |
Notice of Allowance dated May 16, 2019 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/153,262. |
Notice of Allowance dated May 17, 2019 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/153,050. |
Notice of Allowance dated May 22, 2019 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/101,382. |
Notice of Allowance dated May 24, 2019 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/101,387. |
Notice of Allowance dated May 28, 2019 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/101,386. |
Notice of Allowance dated May 28, 2019 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/195,816. |
Notice of Allowance dated May 31, 2019 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/101,382. |
Notice of Allowance dated Jun. 1, 2019 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/961,826. |
Notice of Allowance dated Jun. 4, 2019 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/961,828. |
Notice of Allowance dated Jun. 4, 2019 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/961,832. |
Notice of Allowance dated Jun. 7, 2019 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/101,380. |
Notice of Allowance dated Jun. 14, 2019 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/195,832. |
Notice of Allowance dated Jun. 24, 2019 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/101,386. |
Notice of Allowance dated Jun. 11, 2019 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/153,146. |
Notice of Allowance dated Jun. 11, 2019 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/153,196. |
Notice of Allowance dated Jun. 11, 2019 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/153,223. |
Notice of Allowance dated Jul. 3, 2019 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/153,196. |
Notice of Allowance dated Jul. 12, 2019 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/195,827. |
Notice of Allowance dated Jul. 22, 2019 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/101,387. |
Notice of Allowance dated Jul. 22, 2019 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/153,050. |
Notice of Allowance dated Jul. 22, 2019 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/153,168. |
Notice of Allowance dated Jul. 31, 2019 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/101,380. |
Notice of Allowance dated Aug. 5, 2019 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/153,146. |
Notice of Allowance dated Aug. 9, 2019 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/153,223. |
Notice of Allowance dated Aug. 12, 2019 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/153,262. |
Notice of Allowance dated Aug. 13, 2019 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/195,827. |
Notice of Allowance dated Sep. 5, 2019 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/264,580. |
Office Action dated Jan. 22, 2019 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/153,223. |
Office Action dated Jan. 24, 2019 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/153,262. |
Office Action dated Feb. 7, 2019 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/153,168. |
Office Action dated Feb. 26, 2019 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/153,146. |
Office Action dated Mar. 12, 2019 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/153,196. |
Office Action dated Mar. 14, 2019 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/195,827. |
Office Action dated Mar. 21, 2019 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/195,816. |
Office Action dated Mar. 21, 2019 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/195,830. |
Office Action Summary in U.S. Appl. No. 13/727,662 dated Apr. 10, 2015. |
Oran, D., (ed.), “OSI IS-IS Intrad-domain Routing Protocol”, RFC 1142, pp. 1-193, Internet Engineering Task Force, http://tools.ietf.org/rfc/rfc1142. txt, Feb. 1990. |
Pao, D. et al, “Efficient Hardware Architecture for Fast IP Address Lookup” IEEE, Proceedings Twenty First Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies, Jun. 23-27 2002, vol. 2, pp. 555-561. |
Perkins, C. et al, “Ad hoc On-Demand Distance Vector (AODV) Routing”, RFC 3561, pp. 1-37, Internet Engineering Task Force, http://lools.ielf.org/rfc/rfc3561.lxl, Jul. 2003. |
Pignataro et al., “Seamless Bidirectional Forwarding Detection (S-BFD) for IPv4, IPv6 and MPLS,” draftietf-bfd-seamless-ip-06, Internet Engineering Task Force, Internet-Draft, May 6, 2016, 8 pages. |
Pignataro et al.,“Seamless Bidirectional Forwarding Detection (S-BFD),” draft-ieft-bfd-seamless-base-11, Internet Engineering Task Force, Internet-Draft, May 6, 2016, 21 pages. |
Postel, J et al “Comments on the IP Source Route Option” RFC unnumbered, IETF 1987, 18 pages. |
Postel, J. et al. “Darpa Internet Program Protocol Specification RFC 791”, Sep. 1981, prepared for DARPA by Information Sciences Institute, University of Southern California, 50 pages, IETF. |
Postel, J; “Internet Protocol, DARPA Internet Protocol Specification”, RFC 791 ,pp. 1-45, Internet Engineering Task Force (IEFT), http://tools.iefl.org/rfc/rfc791.txt, Sep. 1981. |
Postel, John (ed.), Editor; “Transmission Control Protocol—DARPA Internet Protocol Specification”, RFC 793, pp. 1-85, USC/Information Sciences Institute, http://tools.ietf.org/rfc/rfc793.txt, Sep. 1981. |
Previdi et al., “IS-IS Extensions for Segment Routing,” draft-ietf-isis-segment-routing-extensions-05, IS-IS for IP Internets, Internet-Draft, Jun. 30, 2015, pp. 1-37. |
Previdi et al., “IS-IS Extensions for Segment Routing,” draft-ietf-isis-segment-routing-extensions-06, IS-IS for IP Internets, Internet-Draft, Dec. 14, 2015, pp. 1-39. |
Previdi et al., “Segment Routing Egress Peer Engineering BGPLS Extensions”, Network Working Group Internet-Draft, < draft-previdi-idr-bgpls-segment-routing-epe-01 >, Internet Engineering Task Force Trust, Oct. 25, 2014, 16 pages. |
Previdi et al., “Segment Routing with IS-IS Routing Protocol, draft-previdi-filsfils-isis-segment-routing-00,” Cisco Systems, Inc., IS-IS for IP Internets, Internet-Draft, Mar. 12, 2013, pp. 1-27. |
Previdi et al., “Segment Routing with IS-IS Routing Protocol, draft-previdi-filsfils-isis-segment-routing-02,” Cisco Systems, Inc., Internet-Draft Mar. 20, 2013, pp. 1-27. |
Psenak et al. “OSPF Extensions for Segment Routing,” draft-ietf-ospf-segment-routing-extensions-05, Open Shortest Path First IGP, Internet-Draft, Jun. 26, 2015, pp. 1-29. |
Quinn et al., “Network Service Header—draft-quinn-sfc-nsh-07.txt,” Network Working Group, Internet-Draft, Feb. 24, 2015, pp. 1-43. |
Raszuk, R., “MPLS Domain Wide Labels,” NTT 13, draft-raszuk-mpls-domain-widelabels-00, MPLS Working Group, Internet-Draft, Jul. 14, 2013, pp. 1-6. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 16264580 | Jan 2019 | US |
Child | 16691593 | US | |
Parent | 15961818 | Apr 2018 | US |
Child | 16264580 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 14274632 | May 2014 | US |
Child | 15961818 | US | |
Parent | 13727651 | Dec 2012 | US |
Child | 14274632 | US | |
Parent | 13727652 | Dec 2012 | US |
Child | 13727651 | US | |
Parent | 13727653 | Dec 2012 | US |
Child | 13727652 | US | |
Parent | 13727655 | Dec 2012 | US |
Child | 13727653 | US | |
Parent | 13727657 | Dec 2012 | US |
Child | 13727655 | US | |
Parent | 13727662 | Dec 2012 | US |
Child | 13727657 | US |