The present invention relates to a rubber mat used for forming a roadway or pathway for vehicles and people in order to avoid causing environmental damage and providing a platform over unstable terrain, the access mat preferably being made from recycled vehicle tires.
Most access mats currently in use are made from wood. Recycled tires provide an abundant source of inexpensive material for making access mats. Unfortunately, access mats made from rubber currently have limited utility. They can be used to protect a paved highway, when heavy equipment must be moved across the highway. However, they can not provide the underlying support that wood or other more rigid materials provide.
What is required is a more versatile configuration of rubber access mat.
According to the present invention there is provided a rubber access mat which includes a rubber slab having opposed side edges defining a width and opposed end edges defining a length. A rigidifying grid of reinforcing wire is embedded within the rubber slab. The grid consists of a plurality of parallel spaced wires extending continuously between the opposed side edges for most of the width of the rubber slab and a plurality of parallel spaced wires extending continuously between the opposed end edges for most of the length of the rubber slab. The reinforcing wire is not less than number ten gauge wire.
By following the teachings of the present invention, a rubber access mat can be fabricated which is capable of supporting heavy loads in soft or unstable terrain and completing with wooden and other more rigid access mats. As will hereinafter be further described, there are a number of reasons why rubber access mats can be considered to be superior to wooden access mats. The cost of wood is increasing, as our forests become depleted. At the same time, there is an environmental problem being experienced in the disposal of used vehicle tires. These used vehicle tires provide an abundance of low cost materials, so that rubber access mats made from recycled vehicular tires rubber access mats are extremely cost competitive with wood access mats. In addition, the longevity of wood mats is adversely affected by water absorption and insect infestation whereas rubber is resilient to these items whereby providing a longer life span.
These and other features of the invention will become more apparent from the following description in which reference is made to the appended drawings, the drawings are for the purpose of illustration only and are not intended to in any way limit the scope of the invention to the particular embodiment or embodiments shown, wherein:
The preferred embodiment, a rubber access mat generally identified by reference numeral 10, will now be described with reference to
Structure and Relationship of Parts:
Referring to
Operation:
Referring to
Advantages:
The results obtained through the use of wooden access mats vary with site conditions. Wooden access mats perform best when laid on soft terrain, such as muskeg and swamp. The wooden access mat provides the necessary rigidity to support a vehicle, whereas prior art rubber access mats tended to flex, fold and sink. However, the very rigidity which makes the wooden access mats suited for soft terrain, causes problems on uneven or unstable terrain, such in uneven sand or soil. When unevenly supported, the wooden access mats tend to tip back and forth like a teeter-totter. In addition, vehicle traffic will cause the mats to fracture and break when they are installed over a span.
In contrast, by altering the characteristics of the grid, rubber access mat 10 can be made with sufficient rigidity to compete with wooden mats, some rigidity while retaining sufficient flexibility and memory to conform to uneven terrain, or degrees of rigidity in between. This is accomplished by changing the gauge of wire and by changing the spacing between the wires. As will be apparent from the examples which will hereinafter be provided, one may use the same gauge of wire between the opposed side edges as is used between the opposed end edges or one may use different gauges of wire. One may use the same relative spacing between the wires between the opposed side edges as is used between the opposed end edges, or one may use different relative spacing. For each of the following examples the rubber access mats were made eight feet wide and fourteen feet long.
A rigid rubber access mat 10 to rival a wooden access mat:
Beneficial results have been obtained when wires 20 extending between opposed side edges 14 are steel with a number six gauge and a relative spacing of approximately two inches and wires 20 extending between opposed end edges 16 are steel with a number three gauge and a relative spacing of approximately three inches.
A rubber access mat 10 with some rigidity, while maintaining sufficient flexibility and memory for use on sand:
Beneficial results have been obtained when wires 20 extending between opposed side edges 14 are steel with a number ten gauge and a relative spacing of approximately four inches and wires 20 extending between opposed end edges 16 are steel with a number ten gauge and a relative spacing of approximately four inches.
A rubber access mat 10 which has characteristics between those of Example #1 and Example #2. This rubber access mat 10 was developed for use with ice bridges. In this application, mat 10 must have some flexibility to follow the contours of the ice bridge, but must be sufficiently rigid to provide support over portions of the ice bridge which become unstable during freeze and thaw cycles.
Beneficial results have been obtained when wires 20 extending between opposed side edges 14 are steel with a number six gauge and a relative spacing of approximately three inches and wires 20 extending between opposed end edges 16 are steel with a number six gauge and a relative spacing of approximately three inches.
Variations:
It should be apparent to one skilled in the art that the examples given are only representative. The gauge of wire and spacing of the wires may be altered to give the grid desired qualities to suit the particular needs of any installation site. From the development work performed, wires having a gauge of less than ten are not believed to have utility in this application. In addition, it will be understood that the access mats 10 may be sized for use by people as sidewalks (for example, 3 feet wide and 14 feet long), by trucks (as described above), by smaller equipment and vehicles, such as an ATV, or sized to be placed under drilling rigs for levelling and stabilization purposes. In the latter case, a convenient size is 1 foot wide, 3 inches thick, and between 4 and 10 feet long. In situations where a greater load carrying capability is required, more than one rigidifying grids 18 may be used, for example, two grids 18 as shown in
In this patent document, the word “comprising” is used in its non-limiting sense to mean that items following the word are included, but items not specifically mentioned are not excluded. A reference to an element by the indefinite article “a” does not exclude the possibility that more than one of the element is present, unless the context clearly requires that there be one and only one of the elements.
It will be apparent to one skilled in the art that modifications may be made to the illustrated embodiment without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention as hereinafter defined in the Claims.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2473000 | Jun 2004 | CA | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/CA2004/001944 | 11/10/2004 | WO | 00 | 10/12/2005 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2006/002507 | 1/12/2006 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
792979 | Fulghum | Jun 1905 | A |
1453123 | Bickett | Apr 1923 | A |
RE17020 | Healy | Jul 1928 | E |
2099149 | Turnquist | Nov 1937 | A |
2167195 | Ash | Jul 1939 | A |
2693102 | Luster et al. | Nov 1954 | A |
2999431 | Mitchell | Sep 1961 | A |
3346219 | Salyer et al. | Oct 1967 | A |
3462181 | Lewis | Aug 1969 | A |
3657852 | Worthington et al. | Apr 1972 | A |
3909996 | Ettlinger, Jr. et al. | Oct 1975 | A |
4018025 | Collette | Apr 1977 | A |
4037009 | Severinsen | Jul 1977 | A |
4287693 | Collette | Sep 1981 | A |
4289420 | Davis et al. | Sep 1981 | A |
4388484 | York | Jun 1983 | A |
4600336 | Waller, Jr. | Jul 1986 | A |
4629358 | Springston et al. | Dec 1986 | A |
4888472 | Stitz | Dec 1989 | A |
4946308 | Chevalier | Aug 1990 | A |
4973193 | Watson et al. | Nov 1990 | A |
5032037 | Phillips et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5087149 | Waller, Jr. | Feb 1992 | A |
5482754 | Crook | Jan 1996 | A |
5544976 | Marchbanks | Aug 1996 | A |
5653551 | Seaux | Aug 1997 | A |
5924694 | Kent | Jul 1999 | A |
6048129 | Rue | Apr 2000 | A |
6294768 | Liebech | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6695527 | Seaux et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
978 559 | Nov 1975 | CA |
2 240 815 | Dec 1999 | CA |
601 567 | Jul 1978 | CH |
19 704 366 | Aug 1998 | DE |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20060286341 A1 | Dec 2006 | US |