Rubber composition

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 4414363
  • Patent Number
    4,414,363
  • Date Filed
    Wednesday, June 16, 1982
    42 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, November 8, 1983
    40 years ago
Abstract
A rubber composition comprising as main components (1) at least one rubber having a glass transition temperature of from -45.degree. C. to 0.degree. C. and selected from the group consisting of an isoprene-butadiene copolymer rubber and polyisoprene rubber and (2) at least one rubber selected from the group consisting of natural rubber and cis-1,4-polyisoprene rubber having a cis-1,4-linkage content of at least 90 mole %, said composition having a value, defined by the following formula, of at least 10,[(R-53)+(S-100)]wherein R is a rebound (%) measured at 51.degree. C. by a Dunlop Tripso meter for a vulcanized product of said rubber composition, and S, as defined in the specification, is a wet skid resistance index on a road surface defined by ASTM E-303-74 which is determined at 19.degree. C. by a portable skid tester for a vulcanized product of said rubber composition.
Description

This invention relates to a novel rubber composition having an improved rebound and wet skid resistance and comprising an isoprene-butadiene copolymer rubber and/or polyisoprene rubber having a specified glass transition temperature and natural rubber and/or cis-1,4-polyisoprene rubber as main components.
In an attempt to decrease the fuel consumption of automobiles and to secure their safety, it has been strongly desired in recent years to reduce the rolling resistance, and increase the wet skid resistance, of automobile tires. Generally, these two properties are thought to depend greatly on the dynamic viscoelastic properties of the rubber materials of tire treads, and also known to be inconsistent with each other (see, for example, Jidosha Gijutsu (Automobile Technology), vol. 32, pp. 417-420, 1978; and Transactions of I.R.I., vol. 40, pp. 239-256, 1964).
To reduce the rolling resistance of a tire, it is necessary to form a tire tread from a rubber material having a high rebound. In view of the running condition of an automobile, the rebound must be evaluated at a temperature of from 50.degree. C. to about 70.degree. C. On the other hand, to increase the wet skid resistance of a tire, which is a wet road grip and is important from the standpoint of safety, the tire tread should be formed from a rubber material which undergoes a large energy loss as frictional resistance generated when a tire is allowed to slide on a road surface with braking. In order to balance these two viscoelastically inconsistent properties, a mixture of a styrene-butadiene copolymer rubber having a combined styrene content of 15 to 25% by weight and polybutadiene rubber having a 1,2-linkage content of not more than 30 mole% has previously been used as a rubber material for automobile tire treads. However, this type of material is unable to meet the recent high level of requirements for a balanced combination of these two properties, and it has been desired to develop a new rubber material.
With this background, the present inventors extensively investigated the development of a rubbery material having an excellent rebound and wet skid resistance, and found that a rubber material comprising substantially amorphous polybutadiene rubber containing a limited high proportion of 1,2-linkages, polybutadiene rubber having a low 1,2-linkage and natural rubber as main components can satisfy the aforesaid two properties. This discovery was applied for a patent (U.S. Pat. No. 4,224,197).
On continued investigations, the present inventors have now found that a composition prepared by mixing a rubbe obtained by copolymerizing 1,3-butadiene and isoprene or a polyisoprene rubber obtained by polymerizing isoprene alone and having a glass transition temperature (Tg for short) within a specified range, with natural rubber and/or cis-1,4-polyisoprene rubber having a cis-1,4-linkage content of at least 90 mole% has a markedly improved rebound and wet skid resistance which cannot be anticipated from the rubber composition disclosed in the above-cited U.S. patent.
Thus, according to this invention, there is provided a rubber composition comprising as main components (1) at least one rubber having a glass transition temperature of from -45.degree. C. to 0.degree. C. and selected from the group consisting of an isoprene-butadiene copolymer rubber and polyisoprene rubber and (2) at least one rubber selected from the group consisting of natural rubber and cis-1,4-polyisoprene rubber having a cis-1,4-linkage content of at least 90 mole%, said composition having a value, defined by the following formula, of at least 10,
[(R=53)+(S-100)]
wherein R is a rebound (%) measured at 51.degree. C. by a Dunlop Tripso meter for a vulcanized product of said rubber composition, and S is a wet skid resistance index on a road surface defined by ASTM E-303-74 which is determined at 19.degree. C. by a portable skid tester for a vulcanized product of said rubber composition.
The rubber (1) having a Tg of from -45.degree. C. to 0.degree. C., i.e. the isoprene-butadiene copolymer rubber or polyisoprene rubber, is an essentially amorphous rubber having a major proportion of 1,2-linkages and/or 3,4-linkages which is obtained by polymerizing a mixture of 1,3-butadiene and isoprene or isoprene alone at a temperature of -80.degree. C. to 100.degree. C. in a hydrocarbon solvent in the presence of an organolithium compound, etc. as a catalyst and a polar compound such as ethers or amines. The isoprene-butadiene copolymer rubber includes, for example, a homogeneous random copolymer rubber, a random copolymer rubber containing a minor proportion of butadiene or isoprene blocks, and a block copolymer rubber. The rubber (1) has a Mooney viscosity (ML.sub.1+4, 100.degree. C.) of preferably 20 to 200, more preferably 30 to 150. If its Mooney viscosity is less than 20, the mechanical properties, such as tensile strength, of the resulting composition are inferior. If it exceeds 200, the blendability of the rubber (1) with the rubber (2) is reduced, and the resulting rubber composition is degraded in tensile strength, etc.
If the Tg of the rubber (1) is less than -45.degree. C., the wet skid resistance of a vulcanized product of the resulting rubber composition cannot be improved. If it exceeds 0.degree. C., not only the rebound of the vulcanized product but also its wet skid resistance cannot be improved. Thus, in either case, it is impossible to provide a rubber composition having a balanced combination of high levels of rebound and wet skid resistance as represented by a [(R-53)+(S-100)] value of at least 10. The Tg range is preferably from -40.degree. C. to -15.degree. C., more preferably from -35.degree. C. to -20.degree. C.
The amount of combined isoprene in the isoprene-butadiene copolymer rubber can be varied freely within the above-specified range of Tg. In order to obtain a copolymer rubber which is improved greatly in the aforesaid two properties over polybutadiene having a high 1,2-linkage content, the amount of combined isoprene is preferably at least 5% by weight, more preferably at least 10% by weight.
Needless to say, rubbers comprising the rubber (1) and a small amount of another copolymerizable monomer such as styrene as copolymer units are to be included within the scope of this invention so long as they do not deviate from the spirit and essence of this invention.
The rubbers (2) in the composition of this invention, i.e. natural rubber and cis-1,4-polyisoprene rubber having a cis-1,4-linkage content of at least 90 mole%, can be used either singly or as a mixture.
The ratio between rubber (1) and rubber (2) suitable for the preparation of the composition of this invention having a [(R-53)+(S-100)] of at least 10 differs according to the Tg of the rubber (1). Usually, a preferred composition in accordance with this invention contains 25 to 75% by weight of the rubber (1) and 75 to 25% by weight of the rubber (2).
A part of the rubber (2) may be replaced by a diene-type rubber such as polybutadiene rubber and styrene-butadiene copolymer having a 1,2-linkage content of not more than 30 mole% in an amount which does not impair the balance between rebound and wet skid resistance in order to improve the abrasion resistance of the composition of this invention.
All or some of the rubber components used in this invention can be used as oil-extended rubbers.
The rubber composition of this invention is formed into a rubber compound by kneading with various compounding agents used in the rubber industry, such as various grades of carbon black, process oils, zinc oxide, stearic acid, sulfur, vulcanization accelerators, and oxidation inhibitors, by using mixers usually employed in the rubber industry, such as a roll or a Banbury mixer. The rebound (%) of a vulcanized product obtained by vulcanizing this rubber compound, which is measured at 51.degree. C. by means of a Dunlop Tripso meter, is R as described hereinabove. A value obtained by dividing the wet skid resistance value of the vulcanized product measured by a portable skid tester at 19.degree. C. on a road surface defined in ASTM E-303-74, by the wet skid resistance value of the vulcanized styrene-butadiene copolymer rubber compound (sample No. 1 in Example 1), and multiplying the quotient by 100 is the aforesaid resistance index S.
Tg, as used herein, is a value measured by using a differential scanning calorimeter (DSC).
Since the rubber compositions of this invention has high levels of rebound and wet skid resistance, it is especially suitable as a rubber material for automobile tire treads. It can also be used in bicycle tires, shoe sales, beltings, floor materials, etc.





The following Example specifically illustrates the present invention.
EXAMPLE
One hundred parts by weight of raw material rubbers were kneaded with the various compounding agents shown in Table 1 by means of a Brabender-type mixer having a capacity of 250 ml to obtain various rubber compounds. The amounts of sulfur and vulcanization accelerators were such as to provide an optimally vulcanized condition for each of the compounds.
These rubber compositions were press-cured at 160.degree. C. for 10 to 30 minutes to prepare samples.
TABLE 1______________________________________Raw material rubbers 100 parts by weight(see Tables 2 to 5)Zinc oxide No. 3 3 parts by weightStearic acid 2 parts by weightCarbon black (HAF) 50 parts by weightHigh aromatic oil 5 parts by weightSulfur varying amountsVulcanization accelerator varying amount.sup.(N--oxydiethylene-2-benzo-thiazol sulfenamide)Antioxidant(N--phenyl-N-- 1 part by weightisopropyl-p-phenylenediamine)______________________________________
Polybutadiene having a high 1,2-linkage content, a butadiene-isoprene copolymer rubber and polyisoprene rubber having the properties shown in Table 2 were prepared in accordance with usual solution-polymerization techniques by polymerizing 1,3-butadiene and/or isoprene at a temperature of 40.degree. to 90.degree. C. in a cyclohexane solvent in the presence of a n-butyl lithium as a catalyst and diethylene glycol dimethyl ether as a polar compound.
Table 2 also gives the properties of commercially available cis-1,4-polyisoprene rubber and styrene-butadiene copolymer rubber.
TABLE 2__________________________________________________________________________ Composition of copolymer rubber Mooney Tg Contents of linkages (butadiene/ viscosity (*1) (mole %) (*2)Types of rubber isoprene) (ML.sub.1+4, 100.degree. C.) (.degree.C.) 1,2 1,2 + 3,4 1,4__________________________________________________________________________Polybutadiene having a (I) 48 -56 69 31high 1,2-combined unit (II) 50.5 -45 76 24 (III) 49.5 -34 83 17 (IV) 43 -28 88 12Butadiene-isoprene (a) 90/10 (parts 84 -23 71.8 28.2copolymer rubber by weight) (b) 75/25 (parts 87 -21 74.8 25.2 by weight) (c) 75/25 (parts 58.5 -37 58.1 41.9 by weight) (d) 75/25 (parts 66 -55 36.7 63.3 by weight) (e) 50/50 (parts 54.5 -17 72.6 27.4 by weight) (f) 25/75 (parts 55 -25 58.1 41.9 by weight)Polyisoprene rubber (g) 66 -2 63.5 36.5 (h) 47 -17 54.5 45.5 (i) 47 -26 48.7 51.3 (j) 53.5 -31 44.1 55.9 (k) 48 -49 22.8 77.2Cis-1,4-polyisoprene rubber (*3) 83 -64 cis 98Butadiene-styrene copolymer rubber (*4) 53 -55 15 85__________________________________________________________________________ Note to Table 2 (*1): Measured at a temperature elevating rate of 2.5.degree. C./min. by means of a highly sensitive differential scanning calorimeter (Type SSC/560 manufactured by Daini Seikosha K. K.). (*2): The 1,2linkage contents of the polybutadiene and butadienestyrene copolymer rubber were determined by an infrared spectroscopic method (the Morero method). The linkage contents of the butadieneisoprene copolymer rubber and polyisoprene rubber [the total (1,2 + 3,4)linkage contents and the total 1,4(cis + trans)linkage contents] were determined by HNMR. (*3): Nipol IR 2200, a product of Nippon Zeon Co., Ltd. (*4): Nipol SBR 1502, a product of Nippon Zeon Co., Ltd.
The various properties of the vulcanized products of these compounds were measured, and the results are shown in Table 3.
The mechanical properties were measured in accordance with JIS K-6301.
The rebound at 23.degree. C. was measured by using a Ruepke type rebound tester, and the rebound (R) at 51.degree. C., by using a Dunlop Tripso meter.
The wet skid resistance index (S) was determined by measuring the resistance on a road surface (type B for outdoor use made by 3M Company; black safety walk) defined in ASTM E-303-74 at 19.degree. C. by means of a portable skid tester (Stanley Company), and calculating the index (S) in accordance with the following equation. ##EQU1##
The Pico abrasion index was determined by measuring the amount of wear by means of a Goodrich-type Pico abrasion tester in accordance with ASTM D-2228, and calculating the index in accordance with the following equation. ##EQU2##
Higher indices mean better properties.
For comparison, Table 3 also shows the properties of vulcanized products of cis-1,4-polyisoprene rubber, styrene-butadiene copolymer rubber and polybutadienes (I) to (IV) having a high 1,2-linkage content, and a vulcanization product of a mixture of the polybutadiene and cis-1,4-polyisoprene rubber.
TABLE 3__________________________________________________________________________ Sample No. Comparison 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12__________________________________________________________________________Styrene-butadiene copolymer rubber 100Cis-1,4-Polyisoprene rubber 100 50 50 25 50 75 50Polybutadiene having (I) 100 50a high 1,2-linkage (II) 100 50 (III) 100 75 50 25 (IV) 100 50Sulfur 1.75 2.0 1.0 1.5 1.0 1.5 1.0 1.25 1.5 1.75 1.0 1.5Vulcanization accelerator 1.1 0.8 2.0 1.4 2.0 1.4 2.0 1.7 1.4 1.1 2.0 1.4Properties of the vulcanizateRebound (%) at 23.degree. C. (Ruepke-type) 45 54 49 50 43 49 36 43 48 52 31 44 at 51.degree. C. (by Dunlop 53 65 55 60 53 59 50 54 58 62 48 57 Tripso meter) [R]Wet skid resistance index (19.degree. C.) [S] 100 96 100 98 104 101 109 105 104 99 109 105Pico abrasion index 100 68 58 61 51 55 51 53 56 60 46 54Tensile strength (kg/cm.sup.2) 301 326 165 280 156 197 188 201 243 280 159 201Elongation (%) 480 590 460 540 410 460 400 420 490 520 400 470300% tensile stress (kg/cm.sup.2) 158 129 93 107 104 111 125 122 123 123 108 115[(R-53) + (S-100)] 0 8 2 5 4 7 6 6 9 8 4 9__________________________________________________________________________
Table 4 shows the properties of vulcanized products (samples 13 to 23) of butadiene-isoprene copolymer rubbers (a to f) and polyisoprene rubbers (g to k) whose glass transition temperatures are within or outside the scope of this invention, and vulcanized products (samples 24 to 34) of those butadiene-isoprene copolymer rubber/cis-1,4-polyisoprene rubber mixtures and polyisoprene rubber/cis-1,4-polyisoprene rubber mixtures which have a Tg within the scope of this invention but cannot achieve the objects of this invention.
TABLE 4__________________________________________________________________________ Sample No.Types of rubber Comparisonand test items 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23__________________________________________________________________________Butadiene-isoprene (a) 100rubbers (b) 100 (c) 100 (d) 100 (e) 100 (f) 100Polyisoprene (g) 100rubbers (h) 100 (i) 100 (j) 100 (k) 100cis-1,4-Polyisoprene rubberSulfur 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0Vulcanization accelerator 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0Properties of the vulcanizateRebound (%) Ruepke (23.degree.) 25 23 37 49 12 19 5 9 17 20 40 Dunlop Tripso 54 53 53 56 41 40 24 33 42 42 52 meter (51.degree. C.) [R]Wet skid resistance index [S] (19.degree. C.) 108 107 107 98 101 109 86 97 111 111 109Pico abrasion index 47 45 47 65 57 41 72 45 37 36 45Tensile strength (kg/cm.sup.2) 164 170 79 177 208 186 180 187 198 193 157Elongation (%) 380 410 510 500 470 560 540 590 610 630 540300% Tensile stress (kg/cm.sup.2) 116 110 90 89 122 92 100 89 83 77 74[(R-53) + (S-100)] 9 7 7 1 -11 -4 -43 -23 0 0 8__________________________________________________________________________ Sample No.Types of rubber Comparisonand test items 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34__________________________________________________________________________Butadiene-isoprene (a)rubbers (b) (c) (d) 75 50 25 (e) 75 (f)Polyisoprene (g) 75 50 25rubbers (h) 75 (i) (j) (k) 75 50 25cis-1,4-Polyisoprene rubber 25 25 25 25 25 50 50 50 75 75 75Sulfur 1.25 1.25 1.25 1.25 1.25 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.75 1.75 1.75Vulcanization accelerator 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.1 1.1 1.1Properties of the vulcanizateRebound (%) Ruepke (23.degree.) 51 21 6 16 44 53 12 48 54 27 51 Dunlop Tripso 60 50 44 48 56 64 51 59 65 57 62 meter (51.degree. C.) [R]Wet skid resistance index [S] (19.degree. C.) 98 108 96 105 105 97 99 100 97 101 98Pico abrasion index 67 61 89 55 50 71 82 56 60 73 62Tensile strength (kg/cm.sup.2) 209 209 197 205 215 247 207 264 290 242 296Elongation (%) 560 450 490 570 590 580 490 630 580 47 620300% Tensile stress (kg/cm.sup.2) 88 125 125 97 92 102 135 104 111 143 120[(R-53) + (S-100)] 5 5 -13 0 8 8 -3 6 9 5 7__________________________________________________________________________
Table 5 shows the properties of vulcanized products (samples Nos. 35 to 56) of rubber compositions in accordance with this invention. It is surprising that especially as is seen in samples Nos. 41 and 42, compositions having an excellent balance of high levels of rebound and wet skid resistance represented by an R of 62 and an S of 110 can be obtained.
TABLE 5__________________________________________________________________________ Sample No.Types of rubber Inventionand test items 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45__________________________________________________________________________Butadiene-isoprene (a) 75 50rubbers (b) 75 50 (c) 75 50 (e) 50 (f) 75 50Polyisoprene (h)rubbers (i) 75 (j) 75cis-1,4-Polyisoprene rubber 25 25 25 25 25 25 50 50 50 50 50Sulfur 1.25 1.25 1.25 1.25 1.25 1.25 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5Vulcanization accelerator 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4Properties of the vulcanizateRebound (%) Ruepke (23.degree. C.) 37 34 43 27 26 29 45 44 47 32 35 Dunlop Tripso 60 58 59 53 53 52 62 62 62 57 59 meter (51.degree. C.) [R]Wet skid resistance index [S] (19.degree. C.) 111 110 106 112 114 111 110 110 103 110 108Pico abrasion index 50 50 55 47 43 44 58 56 60 58 52Tensile strength (kg/cm.sup.2) 192 184 196 209 219 221 227 225 241 220 230Elongation (%) 490 450 510 550 570 620 530 530 570 460 540300% Tensile stress (kg/cm.sup.2) 99 113 96 96 102 93 104 105 105 128 116[(R-53) + (S-100)] 18 15 12 12 14 10 19 19 12 14 14__________________________________________________________________________ Sample No.Types of rubber Inventionand test items 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56__________________________________________________________________________Butadiene-isoprene (a) 25rubbers (b) 25 (c) 25 (e) 25 (f) 25Polyisoprene (h) 50 25rubbers (i) 50 25 (j) 50 25cis-1,4-Polyisoprene rubber 50 50 50 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 75Sulfur 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.75 1.75 1.75 1.75 1.75 1.75 1.75 1.75Vulcanization accelerator 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1Properties of the vulcanizateRebound (%) Ruepke (23.degree. C.) 24 36 38 50 50 51 44 46 37 46 46 Dunlop Tripso 56 59 59 64 64 64 62 62 62 61 62 meter (51.degree. C.) [R]Wet skid resistance index [S] (19.degree. C.) 108 112 107 105 105 100 103 104 103 105 102Pico abrasion index 58 48 51 64 62 65 63 58 62 54 59Tensile strength (kg/cm.sup.2 ) 211 234 239 272 270 268 263 262 234 261 275Elongation (%) 500 540 560 560 560 580 510 530 480 520 540300% Tensile stress (kg/cm.sup.2) 121 117 112 106 115 108 131 130 132 129 129[(R-53) + (S-100)] 11 18 13 16 16 11 12 13 12 13 11__________________________________________________________________________
Claims
  • 1. A rubber composition comprising as main components (1) 25 to 75% by weight of at least one essentially amorphous rubber having a glass transition temperature of from -45.degree. C. to 0.degree. C., a Mooney viscosity (ML.sub.1+4, 100.degree. C.) of 20-200 and 1,2-linkages, 3,4-linkages or both 1,2- and 3,4-linkages and selected from the group consisting of an isoprene-butadiene copolymer rubber, polyisoprene rubber and mixtures thereof and (2) 75 to 25% by weight of at least one rubber selected from the group consisting of natural rubber; cis-1,4-polyisoprene rubber having a cis-1,4-linkage content and mixture thereof of at least 90 mole%, said composition having a value, defined by the following formula, of at least 10,
  • ((R-53)+(S-100))
  • wherein R is a rebound (%) measured at 51.degree. C. by a Dunlop Tripso meter for vulcanized product of said rubber composition, and a wet skid resistance index S which is determined at 19.degree. C. by a portable skid tester for a vulcanized product of said rubber composition on a road surface defined by ASTM E-303-74.
  • 2. The rubber composition of claim 1 wherein the rubber (1) has a glass transition temperature of from -40.degree. C. to -15.degree. C.
  • 3. The rubber composition of claim 1 or 2 wherein the essentially amorphous rubber component (1) comprises the isoprene-butadiene copolymer rubber wherein the isoprene unit content of the isoprene-butadiene copolymer rubber is at least 5% by weight.
  • 4. The rubber composition of claim 3 wherein the isoprene unit content of the isoprene-butadiene copolymer rubber is at least 10% by weight.
  • 5. The rubber composition of claim 1 or 2 wherein the rubber (1) has a Mooney viscosity (ML.sub.1+4, 100.degree. C.) of 30 to 150.
  • 6. The rubber composition of claim 1 wherein the essentially amorphous rubber component (1) comprises polyisoprene rubber.
  • 7. The rubber composition of claim 1 wherein the essentially amorphous rubber component (1) is a mixture of the isoprene-butadiene copolymer rubber and polyisoprene rubber.
  • 8. The rubber composition of claim 1 wherein the rubber component (2) is natural rubber.
  • 9. The rubber composition of claim 1 wherein the rubber component (2) is cis-1,4-polyisoprene rubber.
  • 10. The rubber composition of claim 1 wherein the rubber component (2) is a mixture of natural rubber and cis-1,4-polyisoprene rubber.
US Referenced Citations (7)
Number Name Date Kind
3365416 Vittorelli et al. Jan 1968
3919130 Cohen Nov 1975
4220564 Tanimoto et al. Sep 1980
4321168 Ueda et al. Mar 1982
4323485 Ahagon et al. Apr 1982
4342670 Ahagon et al. Aug 1982
4350621 Bond et al. Sep 1982