This application is a National Stage application under 35 U.S.C. §371 and claims benefit under 35 U.S.C. §119(a) of International Application No. PCT/EP2005/053326 having an International Filing Date of Jul. 12, 2005, which claims benefit of European Application Serial No. 04291801.1 filed on Jul. 13, 2004.
The invention relates to a rubber-polyolefin surface covering.
Standard rubber floor coverings are well known in public. The major advantages of such floor coverings are their dimensional stability, the absence of creeping and their relatively high resistance to abrasion. However, the rubber floor coverings are suffering from low tear and stain resistance and are also sensitive for scratches. Smell is another disadvantage.
A standard rubber formulation is as follows:
The object of the present invention is to provide an improved surface covering as far as tear and stain resistance are concerned.
In accordance with the present invention, a surface covering comprising between 5 and 50% w/w of elastomer material, between 5 and 50% w/w of thermoplastic material, between 25 and 70% w/w of filler and between 1% and 10% w/w of vulcanisation system.
An example of vulcanisation system is TBBS, ZBEC, CBS, sulphur, stearic acid and zinc oxide.
Such surface coverings have a higher tear and stain resistance than the traditional rubber surface coverings.
An additional advantage of the rubber-PO surface coverings of the invention is that the sheets and tiles can be sealed, by welding them at their seams, as usual in PVC flooring which is not possible in standard rubber flooring.
Formulation evaluations have shown that the content of thermoplastic material has to be between 5 and 50%, the elastomer content of the material has to be between 5 and 50% and the filler level between 25 and 70%. The vulcanisation system is of traditional type.
The use of the following thermoplastic polymers or mixtures thereof in the formulations is especially preferred and enhances specific properties of the finished product:
UHMWPE (Ultra High Molecular Weight Polyethylene): improves the surface of the flooring.
Acid copolymer (such as E/MMA, E/M) or terpolymer: improves the tear and scratch resistance and gives low friction.
Ionomer: improves the scratch and tear resistance and gives low friction.
Polystyrene: improves the scratch and scuffmark resistance.
Acrylate: EBA (Ethylene Butyl Acrylate) improves the tear resistance and gives low friction.
EMA (Ethylene Methyl Acrylate) improves the tear resistance.
EVA (Ethylene Vinyl Acetate) improves the tear resistance.
Ethylene Octane Copolymer improves the tear resistance.
Furthermore, PVC (Poly Vinyl Chloride), PE (Polyethylene), PP (Polypropylene), Polybutylene or mixtures thereof can also be incorporated in the product.
Of the tested thermoplastic polymers, ionomers are especially preferred since they give better results as far as the floor properties are concerned. They improve the tear resistance, the friction and the scratch resistance of the flooring even further. An addition of 5 to 50% w/w ionomers, preferably between 15 to 20% gives the best results.
The following elastomer materials (rubbers) are suitable to use in the context of the invention:
SBR (Styrene Butadiene Rubber)
NBR (Nitrile Butadiene Rubber)
NR (Natural Rubber)
IR (Isoprene rubber)
EPDM (Ethylene Propylene Rubber)
All rubber types improve the dimensional stability and the creeping properties since the polymer chains are crosslinked in the vulcanization process.
First trials have shown that, by simply mixing the different components, it was hardly possible to process the formulation due to the very high viscosity at high temperature. Significant improvements in the processability were obtained by adding an EBA polymer and/or by adding high styrene resin (SBR with a high amount of bound styrene, such as from 50 to 85%, preferably 55 to 75% of bound styrene), preferably in quantities between 5 and 20% w/w, especially between 7 and 15% w/w.
It was also helpful to add silicones, e.g. polymethylsiloxan, between 0.5 and 5% w/w, preferably between 1.5 and 2.5% w/w to lower friction during the production process.
The surface covering may further comprises a top coating comprising a PU-dispersion, a PU-solution, a 2-components PU, a PU acrylate, an epoxy acrylate, a polyester acrylate, a polyether acrylate, a silicone acrylate or a mixture thereof to further reinforce the scratch resistance and other properties.
In a preferred embodiment, the top coating comprises a water based UV-curable PU-acrylate dispersion with a dry content of between 5% and 80% w/w, preferably between 20 and 60% w/w.
The top coating has usually a thickness of between 0.5 μm to 100 μm.
The present invention will be more apparent from the following description of a not limiting embodiment with reference to the attached drawings, wherein
Typical formulations for the product according to the invention are as follows:
The vulcanization package is of traditional type.
The production process for a homogenous rubber-PO floor is described below with regard to
A rubber compounder delivers a single coloured compound in sheet form. Three sheets of different colours are granulated and calendered in a roller mill to form a marbled sheet. In this process stage the material is not supposed to vulcanize, therefore the temperature of the roller mill should be below 130° C. The process parameters of the roller mill are set as follows: Speed: 5-10 m/min, Temperature: <130° C.
The thus obtained sheet is then granulated to obtain granules of suitable sizes (e.g. 0.1 to 40 mm). The granules are scattered on the steel belt in a double belt press and pressed to a multicoloured, marbled sheet. In this process stage, the material is vulcanized. The temperature of the heating zone in the belt press exceeds 130° C. which is the temperature at which the vulcanization package works. The process parameters of the double belt press are set as follows: Pressure: 3-20 bar, Temperature: 130-200° C., Speed: >2m/min.
The properties of a standard rubber floor compared to the rubber-PO floor according to the invention.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
04291801 | Jul 2004 | EP | regional |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2005/053326 | 7/12/2005 | WO | 00 | 1/11/2007 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2006/005752 | 1/19/2006 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5244942 | Hover et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
6153680 | Shah et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6398369 | Starling | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6933344 | Shah et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
20020168500 | Graab et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030052431 | Shah et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030212211 | Lenox et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030224128 | Ylitalo et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
385053 | Sep 1990 | EP |
1361249 | Nov 2003 | EP |
1389519 | Feb 2004 | EP |
1389519 | Feb 2004 | EP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20080053335 A1 | Mar 2008 | US |