The present invention relates to roof underlayments and more particularly, to heavyweight and lightweight underlayment products which utilizes a rubberized asphalt layer.
An underlayment material is commonly used in a number of roofing applications as well as other underlayment situations. The typical product utilized in roofing underlayment is commonly referred to as “tar” of “felt” paper. The traditional “tar paper” is an asphalt impregnated paper product which is sold in a roll; unrolled on a roof; cut to length; and fastened to the roof utilizing staples or nails. Although tar paper is inexpensive, it does not seal nail holes through the paper and thus does not prevent water infiltration. In addition, once the felt is rolled out, it absorbs water and once wet, it wrinkles and expands, and must be allowed to dry out before covering with shingles. Other prior art shingle underlayment products also suffer from the same problems.
Accordingly, what is needed are generally low cost, heavyweight or lightweight, dimensionally stable underlayment products on which the installer can walk, without sticking or slipping, which will not slide underfoot and which will cold flow and/or elongate and recover to seal nail holes and other punctures. In addition, such products should be dimensionally stable, resist tearing, non-adhesive to other layers, and provide hot and cold flexibility.
The present invention features novel underlayment products which will be relatively inexpensive and replace prior art products such as “tar paper” or “felt paper”. The present invention provides underlayment products with a top surface that can be walked on and will not slide under foot, and wherein the products will not stick to themselves or the roof. In addition, the present invention has “cold” flow properties which allow it to “repair” or “heal” itself to thereby reseal around nail or puncture holes and also elongate and recover around punctures.
In accordance with one embodiment of the present invention, the underlayment includes an underlayment membrane comprising a fibrous mat having an upper surface and a lower surface. An elastomeric asphalt coating is applied to the lower surface of the fibrous mat and at least partially or fully infiltrates and saturates the fibrous mat. Next, an oxidized asphalt coating is applied to both the upper and lower surfaces of the fibrous mat, thereby essentially encapsulating the fibrous mat.
The underlayment membrane may further include a release coating applied to the oxidized asphalt coating on either the upper and/or lower surface of the fibrous mat. The release coating includes, in one embodiment, a talc/water coating but may alternatively include granule particles applied proximate at least the oxidized asphalt coating proximate said upper surface of said fibrous mat.
The release coating may include a polymeric coating applied on at least the upper surface of the fibrous mat while the polymeric coating may be provided with a coating of finally-ground mineral, such as talc and finely-ground granules.
In the preferred embodiment, the rubberized asphalt coating which is applied from the bottom of the mat and partially or fully infiltrates the fibrous mat includes approximately 48% flux asphalt, 2% radial SBS rubber and 50% filler material while the fibrous mat includes fibers selected from the group consisting of polyesters, polypropylenes and fiberglass. The coating may, however, be provided having a range a ingredients including, but not limited to 0.5% to 12% radial or linear rubber or polymer; 0-70% filler; and 48-98% asphalt including 0-70% oxidized asphalt. The filler affects the walkability of the outer surface. If the filler content is too low such that a higher asphalt percentage exists, the product would be sticky. The high filler content and/or talc layer prevents sticking. In addition, the filler also brings down the price of the finished product.
Adding an oxidized asphalt layer on both the top and bottom layer of the mat makes the product more usable in hotter conditions providing a higher resistance to softening by providing an asphalt with a higher Ring and Ball softening point temperature. It also makes the product not stick in three ways: 1) foot traffic 2) the roof deck and 3) in the roll form.
The rubber or other elastomer in the elastomeric layer may be linear or radial rubber although with linear SBS rubber, as much as 10 or 12 percent may be required whereas with radial SBS rubber, 0.5 to 6% will generally suffice.
In the preferred embodiment, the talc coating is suspended in a water-based, polymer emulsion. Examples of the polymer include styrene, acrylic and the polyurethane. When it dries, the polymer forms a film which helps hold the talc to the asphalt so that the talc does not fall off or interfere with any overlap or bonding areas. Loose talc is a slip problem. Although a talc acrylic layer is preferred as the method to prevent sticking, a water or other based polymer may be applied and may be sufficient, as would be a plastic film.
In accordance with another embodiment of the present invention, the underlayment includes an underlayment membrane comprising a fibrous mat having an upper surface and a lower surface. An elastomeric asphalt coating is applied to the upper surface of the fibrous mat and at least partially or fully infiltrates and saturates the fibrous mat. Next, an oxidized asphalt coating is applied in one embodiment to the lower surface of the fibrous mat.
The underlayment membrane may further include a release coating applied to the oxidized asphalt coating on the lower surface of the fibrous mat. In an alternate embodiment without the oxidized asphalt layer, the release coating is applied to the lower surface of the fibrous mat. The release coating includes, in one embodiment, a talc/polymer coating.
The underlayment membrane may further include a split release facing having a high traction surface that is applied to the rubberized asphalt coating on the upper surface of the fibrous mat. The split release facing having a high traction surface, in one embodiment, provides a selvedge edge and includes a plurality of separate and distinct regions bearing a high traction polymer blend.
In the preferred lightweight underlayment embodiment, the rubberized asphalt coating which is applied onto the top of the mat and partially or fully infiltrates the fibrous mat includes approximately 48% flux asphalt, 2% radial SBS rubber and 50% filler material while the fibrous mat includes fibers selected from the group consisting of polyesters, polypropylenes and fiberglass. The coating may, however, be provided having a range a ingredients including, but not limited to 0.5% to 12% radial or linear rubber or polymer; 0-70% filler; and 48-98% asphalt including 0-70% oxidized asphalt. The filler affects the walkability of the outer surface. If the filler content is too low such that a higher asphalt percentage exists, the product would be sticky. The high filler content and/or talc layer prevents sticking. In addition, the filler also brings down the price of the finished product.
The rubber or other elastomer in the elastomeric layer may be linear or radial rubber although with linear SBS rubber, as much as 10 or 12 percent may be required whereas with radial SBS rubber, 0.5 to 6% will generally suffice.
It is important to note that the present invention is not intended to be limited to a system or method which must satisfy one or more of any stated objects or features of the invention. It is also important to note that the present invention is not limited to the preferred, exemplary, or primary embodiment(s) described herein. Modifications and substitutions by one of ordinary skill in the art are considered to be within the scope of the present invention, which is not to be limited except by allowed claims.
These and other features and advantages of the present invention will be better understood by reading the following detailed description, taken together with the drawings wherein:
The present invention features novel underlayment products which will be relatively inexpensive and replace prior art products such as “tar paper” or “felt paper”. The present invention provides underlayment products with a top surface that can be walked on and will not slide under foot, and wherein the products will not stick to themselves or the roof. In addition, the present invention has “cold” flow properties and elongate and recovery properties which allow it to reseal around nail or puncture holes.
The heavyweight underlayment 10,
The fibrous mat 12 is first coated proximate one side with a rubberized asphalt layer 14. The rubberized asphalt layer 14 typically comprises approximately 4% rubber, 46% flux asphalt and 50% filler, although various percentages may be provided. These percentages are approximate and those skilled in the art would understand that a deviation from these percentages is considered within the scope of the present invention.
The rubberized asphalt layer 14 exhibits “cold flow” or “self-healing” properties by virtue of the inclusion of a relatively small percentage of rubber. Accordingly, when the underlayment 10 is punctured, such as by a nail, the rubberized asphalt layer 14 will “self-heal” around the puncture thereby resealing around the puncture. This is particularly important when underlayment is used under roofing tile in which case the tiles are fastened to the roof using “ring” nails which create a hole which is larger than the nail shank itself. In this case, the rubber in the underlayment will actually stick to the ridges in the nail shank and stretch around the nail shank thereby creating a generally watertight seal around the shank of the nail. Without the “self-healing” properties of the rubberized asphalt layer 14 of the underlayment 10 of the present invention, persistent roof leaks abound.
In the preferred embodiment, the rubber includes “SBS” radial rubber although linear rubber, in a higher content percentage, would also be acceptable. The SBS rubber is mixed with the flux asphalt using a high shear mill, as is well known in the art. The rubberized asphalt layer 14 is applied to only one side of the fibrous mat 12. This one-sided application serves to vaporize and drive out any moisture trapped in the fibrous mat 12. Examples of how to coat fibrous mats on one side can be found in the two referenced United States patents previously fully incorporated by reference.
The rubberized asphalt layer 14 infiltrates at least partially but also can extend fully into the central region 13 of fibrous mat 12.
After the application of the rubberized asphalt layer 14 to one side of the fibrous mat 12, oxidized asphalt layers 16a and 16b are applied; with oxidized asphalt layer 16a applied over the rubberized asphalt layer 14 while the oxidized asphalt layer 16b is applied directly to the fibrous mat on the side opposite the rubberized asphalt layer 14. Accordingly, in the preferred embodiment, the interface between the rubberized asphalt layer 14 and the oxidized asphalt layer 16b will occur in region 13 of fibrous mat 12 and not proximate or on the upper surface 15 of fibrous mat 12. If the interface between the oxidized asphalt layer 16b and the rubberized asphalt layer 14 is proximate or at the upper surface 15 of fibrous mat 12, the oxidized asphalt layer 16 exhibits a tendency to slip or shear away from the rubberized asphalt layer particularly due to foot traffic when the product was installed on a hot roof. This presents a dangerous situation and also one where the product would have a tendency to adhere to an adjacent layer.
As is well known in the prior art, an oxidized asphalt layer typically includes approximately 50% oxidized asphalt and 50% filler. The oxidized asphalt layer 16b will become the top surface of the underlayment 10. Since there is no rubberized asphalt layer under the oxidized asphalt layer 16b, anyone walking on this product will not slip given the propensity of oxidized asphalt layer to break away from the rubberized asphalt layer if the rubberized asphalt later were located directly beneath the top oxidized asphalt layer and not within the fibrous mat 12.
Finally, the top and bottom of the underlayment 10 is coated with a talc acrylic layer 18. The talc acrylic layer 18 provides an additional coating to the oxidized asphalt layers, filling in any voids that are present and preventing the membrane from sticking to itself when the rolled. The talc layer 18 is applied as a talc/water or talc polymer mixture as described, for example, in U.S. Pat. No. 6,531,200. In an alternative embodiment, talc layer 18a may be replaced with or include granular particles.
The lightweight underlayment 30,
The rubberized asphalt layer 34 exhibits “cold flow” or “self-healing” properties by virtue of the inclusion of a relatively small percentage of rubber. Accordingly, when the underlayment 30 is punctured, such as by a nail, the rubberized asphalt layer 34 will “self-heal” around the puncture thereby resealing around the puncture. This is particularly important as discussed above when underlayment is used under roofing tile in which case the tiles are fastened to the roof using “ring” nails which create a hole or puncture which is larger than the nail shank itself.
In the preferred embodiment, the rubber includes “SBS” radial rubber although linear rubber, in a higher content percentage, would also be acceptable and is contemplated. The SBS rubber is mixed with the flux asphalt using a high shear mill, as is well known in the art. The rubberized asphalt layer 34 as for the embodiment 10 described hereinabove is applied to only one side of the fibrous mat 32, which serves to vaporize and drive out any moisture trapped in the fibrous mat 32. Examples of how to coat fibrous mats on one side can be found in the two referenced United States patents previously fully incorporated by reference.
The rubberized asphalt layer 34 infiltrates at least partially but also can extend fully into the central region 36 of fibrous mat 32.
After the application of the rubberized asphalt layer 34 to the top of the fibrous mat 32, an oxidized asphalt layer 38 in one embodiment is applied directly to the fibrous mat underside opposite the rubberized asphalt layer 34. As is well known in the prior art, an oxidized asphalt layer typically includes approximately 50% oxidized asphalt and 50% filler.
The bottom of the underlayment 30 is coated with a talc acrylic layer 40. The talc acrylic layer 40 provides an additional coating to the oxidized asphalt layer 34, filling in any voids that are present and preventing the membrane from sticking to itself when rolled. In an alternate embodiment, the oxidized asphalt layer 38 is not used, and the talc acrylic layer 40 is applied directly to the underside of the fibrous mat 32. The talc acrylic layer 40 in either embodiment is applied as a talc/water or talc polymer mixture as described, for example, in U.S. Pat. No. 6,531,200.
The top of the underlayment 30 is coated with a split release facer having high traction surface generally designated 42. As best seen in
The high traction portion 46 preferably is formed of one or more separate and distinct polymer regions disposed on the upper side of the facer 42 that is softer than the material substratum of the facer 42 to provide a high traction surface. The high traction polymer regions may be arranged in any suitable pattern, such as strips, or dots. In one presently preferred embodiment, the high traction polymer is arranged in spaced-apart longitudinally extending strips on a 0.5 mil or 0.25 mil polyethylene film and is fabricated of a blend comprising a mixture of low molecular weight polyethylene and amorphous polyolefin, as disclosed in commonly assigned U.S. Pat. No. 6,385,934 to Zickell et al., incorporated herein by reference.
Accordingly, the present invention provides novel and useful underlayment products which can be used under many roofing or other materials as a substrate or underlayment, which serves to self-seal around any penetrations such as nails and the like.
As mentioned above, the present invention is not intended to be limited to a system or method which must satisfy one or more of any stated or implied object or feature of the invention and should not be limited to the preferred, exemplary, or primary embodiment(s) described herein. Modifications and substitutions by one of ordinary skill in the art are considered to be within the scope of the present invention, which is not to be limited except by the allowed claims and their legal equivalents.
This application is a continuation application of U.S. Ser. No. 12/692,084, filed Jan. 22, 2010, titled RUBBERIZED ROOF UNDERLAYMENT, which is a continuation-in-part of commonly assigned U.S. utility patent application Ser. No. 11/238,371, filed Sep. 29, 2005, now abandoned, of the same inventive entity as herein, both of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2326724 | George et al. | Aug 1943 | A |
3616143 | Langlois | Oct 1971 | A |
3622445 | Heidweiller | Nov 1971 | A |
3753826 | Plummer | Aug 1973 | A |
3759736 | Jenny et al. | Sep 1973 | A |
3904793 | Priester, Jr. et al. | Sep 1975 | A |
4138521 | Brown | Feb 1979 | A |
4243715 | Gordon | Jan 1981 | A |
4472328 | Sugimoto et al. | Sep 1984 | A |
4490493 | Mikols | Dec 1984 | A |
4522673 | Fell et al. | Jun 1985 | A |
4636414 | Tajima et al. | Jan 1987 | A |
4777073 | Sheth | Oct 1988 | A |
4831746 | Kim et al. | May 1989 | A |
4913774 | Goguelin | Apr 1990 | A |
4943465 | Bailey et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
4992315 | Zickell et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
5038693 | Kourtides et al. | Aug 1991 | A |
5102728 | Gay et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
5280064 | Hesp et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5284700 | Strauss et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5308692 | Kennedy et al. | May 1994 | A |
5401588 | Garvey et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5569423 | Belunova et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5601629 | Helbing | Feb 1997 | A |
5654060 | Holman et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5658972 | Grzybowski et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5687517 | Wiercinski et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5813176 | Tzeng et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5916654 | Phillips et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5925695 | Ohtsuka et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5965257 | Ahluwalia | Oct 1999 | A |
5972166 | Helwig et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
6058583 | Takeuchi et al. | May 2000 | A |
6171443 | Goettmann et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6235364 | Katsuro et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6267843 | Helwig et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6296912 | Zickell et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6308482 | Strait | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6326060 | Ogawa | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6365001 | Helwig et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6378259 | Carlson | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6385934 | Zickell et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6497787 | Geel | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6500560 | Kiik et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6517676 | Mathur | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6531200 | Zickell et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6586353 | Kiik et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6641896 | Fensel et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6696125 | Zanchetta et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6720067 | Takahashi et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6811649 | Pfeffer | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6844057 | Dichiara, Jr. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6844091 | Denham et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6925766 | DiPede | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6968662 | Rodrigues | Nov 2005 | B2 |
7115313 | Zanchetta et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7132143 | Zanchetta et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7140153 | Humphreys et al. | Nov 2006 | B1 |
7537820 | Kalkanoglu | May 2009 | B2 |
7563733 | Ahluwalia et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7634877 | Wiercinski | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7836654 | Belt | Nov 2010 | B2 |
8062985 | Collier | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8178449 | LaVietes et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
20020081924 | Fensel et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020092634 | Rokman et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20030054717 | Ahluwalia | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030099833 | Erb, Jr. et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030109190 | Geel | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030148693 | Erb, Jr. et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030175478 | Leclercq | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030176125 | Ahluwalia | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030224679 | Ahluwalia | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030228460 | Ahluwalia | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040016502 | Jones | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040038065 | Francis et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040055240 | Kiik et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040071927 | Murphy et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040116022 | Langley et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040148887 | DiPede | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040161569 | Zanchetta et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040161570 | Zanchetta et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20050031843 | Robinson et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050097857 | Mehta et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050171223 | Thagard, III et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050208851 | Gooliak | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20060078753 | Bomberg et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060118992 | Chang et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060228963 | Souther et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060286347 | Mehta et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070044397 | Wiercinski et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070044407 | Elliott | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070044410 | Kalkanoglu | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070071946 | Zickell | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070137130 | Zickell et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070178784 | Jones et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20080014814 | Geel | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080155923 | Teng et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080166533 | Jones et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080227353 | Klingelhage et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080233325 | Pahl et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080286517 | Zickell | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080289289 | Wiercinski et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090042471 | Cashin et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090277126 | Wollert et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20100119784 | Zickell | May 2010 | A1 |
20100233408 | Zickell | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20110104461 | Grubka | May 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
9425180 | Nov 1994 | WO |
9831537 | Jul 1998 | WO |
0206605 | Jan 2002 | WO |
2006007168 | Jan 2006 | WO |
2006087426 | Aug 2006 | WO |
2007019399 | Feb 2007 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Office action from U.S. Appl. No. 14/265,419 dated Jan. 12, 2016. |
Office action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/238,371 dated Nov. 25, 2008. |
Office action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/238,371 dated Apr. 28, 2009. |
Interview Summary from U.S. Appl. No. 11/238,371 dated Jul. 22, 2009. |
Office action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/238,371 dated Oct. 15, 2009. |
Advisory action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/238,371 dated Jan. 27, 2010. |
Office action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/238,371 dated Mar. 22, 2010. |
Office action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/238,371 dated Oct. 20, 2010. |
Office action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/238,371 dated Jun. 23, 2011. |
Office action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/238,371 dated Dec. 15, 2011. |
Advisory action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/238,371 dated Apr. 3, 2012. |
Office action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/238,371 dated May 23, 2013. |
Office action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/291,634 dated Dec. 22, 2008. |
Interview Summary from U.S. Appl. No. 11/291,634 dated Aug. 4, 2009. |
Office action from U.S. Appl. No. 12/692,084 dated Jul. 20, 2011. |
Office action from U.S. Appl. No. 12/692,084 dated Nov. 10, 2011. |
Office action from U.S. Appl. No. 12/692,084 dated May 23, 2013. |
Office action from U.S. Appl. No. 12/692,084 dated Nov. 8, 2013. |
Advisory Action from U.S. Appl. No. 12/692,084 dated Feb. 28, 2014. |
Office action from U.S. Appl. No. 12/731,706 dated Aug. 20, 2010. |
Office action from U.S. Appl. No. 12/731,706 dated Apr. 1, 2011. |
Office action from U.S. Appl. No. 12/731,706 dated Jun. 14, 2012. |
Office action from U.S. Appl. No. 12/731,706 dated Nov. 8, 2012. |
Office action from U.S. Appl. No. 12/892,629 dated Apr. 24, 2013. |
Office action from U.S. Appl. No. 12/985,072 dated Oct. 16, 2012. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion from PCT/US08/57609 dated Jul. 1, 2008. |
Office action from Canadian Application No. 2,550,172 dated Oct. 9, 2012. |
Office action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/485,652 dated Jul. 13, 2006. |
Office action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/927,268 dated Oct. 29, 2007. |
Notice of Allowance from U.S. Appl. No. 14/265,419 dated Jun. 2, 2016. |
Office action from Canadian Application No. 2,728,709 dated Jan. 11, 2017. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140220311 A1 | Aug 2014 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12692084 | Jan 2010 | US |
Child | 14247306 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11238371 | Sep 2005 | US |
Child | 12692084 | US |