Rugged IQ receiver based RF gain measurements

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 9178627
  • Patent Number
    9,178,627
  • Date Filed
    Thursday, May 31, 2012
    12 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, November 3, 2015
    9 years ago
Abstract
A method and apparatus for measuring a complex gain of a transmit path are disclosed. During a test mode, an IQ to radio frequency modulator modulates a quadrature RF carrier signal using a quadrature test signal. An RF to IQ down-converter down-converts a down-converter RF input signal to provide a quadrature down-converter output signal using the quadrature RF carrier signal. The down-converter RF input signal is based on the quadrature test signal and the gain of the transmit path. A digital frequency converter frequency converts the quadrature down-converter output signal, providing an averaged frequency converter output signal, which is a quadrature direct current signal representative of an amplitude of the quadrature test signal and the gain of the transmit path. Therefore, a measured gain of the transmit path is based on the amplitude of the quadrature test signal and averaged frequency converter output signal.
Description
FIELD OF THE DISCLOSURE

Embodiments of the present disclosure relate to radio frequency (RF) transmitter circuitry, which may be used in RF communications systems, and calibration of the RF transmitter circuitry.


BACKGROUND OF THE DISCLOSURE

As wireless communications technologies evolve, wireless communications systems become increasingly sophisticated. As such, wireless communications protocols continue to expand and change to take advantage of the technological evolution, which may provide support for increasing numbers of simultaneous users in a given RF communications space. In this regard, close management and control of RF transmitters utilized by the simultaneous users may be required, thereby requiring ongoing adjustments of the RF transmitters. RF gains of the RF transmitters may vary with different operational parameters, such as output power, power amplifier supply voltage, type of RF modulation, and the like. As such, certain RF transmitter adjustments may be required based on RF gain. Such adjustments may include changes in transmitter pre-distortion, changes in envelope tracking system operation, changes in transmitter bias, and the like. Therefore, pre-determining a complex RF gain of a transmit path of a wireless device may be useful in making adjustments to the RF transmitter of the wireless device. Thus, there is a need for a pre-determined complex RF gain in the transmit path of the wireless device.


SUMMARY OF THE EMBODIMENTS

Embodiments of the present disclosure relate to a method and an apparatus for measuring a complex gain of a transmit path. Circuitry includes an IQ to RF modulator, an RF to IQ down-converter, and a digital frequency converter. During a test mode, the IQ to RF modulator modulates a quadrature RF carrier signal using a quadrature test signal. During the test mode, the RF to IQ down-converter down-converts a down-converter RF input signal to provide a quadrature down-converter output signal using the quadrature RF carrier signal. The down-converter RF input signal is based on the quadrature test signal and the complex gain of the transmit path. During the test mode, the digital frequency converter frequency converts the quadrature down-converter output signal to provide an averaged frequency converter output signal, which is a quadrature DC signal that is representative of an amplitude and phase of the quadrature test signal and the complex gain of the transmit path. The quadrature down-converter output signal is synchronized to the quadrature test signal. A measured complex gain of the transmit path is based on the amplitude and phase of the quadrature test signal and the averaged frequency converter output signal.


The RF to IQ down-converter is part of an IQ receiver, which may be relatively inexpensive. Such IQ receivers may have certain shortcomings, such as RF carrier leakage, interference from RF images, and the like, that adversely affect complex gain measurements. However, by incorporating the digital frequency converter into the IQ receiver and using a special test signal, as described, the effects of such shortcomings are significantly reduced, thereby ruggedizing the IQ receiver when making complex gain measurements.


Those skilled in the art will appreciate the scope of the present disclosure and realize additional aspects thereof after reading the following detailed description of the preferred embodiments in association with the accompanying drawing figures.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWING FIGURES

The accompanying drawing figures incorporated in and forming a part of this specification illustrate several aspects of the disclosure, and together with the description serve to explain the principles of the disclosure.



FIG. 1 shows an RF communications system during a test according to one embodiment of the RF communications system.



FIG. 2 shows the RF communications system during the test mode according to an alternate embodiment of the RF communications system.



FIG. 3 shows the RF communications system during the test mode according to an additional embodiment of the RF communications system.



FIG. 4 shows the RF communications system during the normal operating mode according to another embodiment of the RF communications system.



FIG. 5 illustrates a process for measuring a complex gain of a transmit path illustrated in FIG. 1 according to one embodiment of the RF communications system.



FIG. 6 shows the RF communications system during the test mode according to a further embodiment of the RF communications system.



FIG. 7 shows details of an IQ to RF modulator illustrated in FIG. 6 according to one embodiment of the IQ to RF modulator.



FIG. 8 shows details of an RF to IQ down-converter illustrated in FIG. 6 according to one embodiment of the RF to IQ down-converter.



FIG. 9 shows details of a digital frequency converter illustrated in FIG. 6 according to one embodiment of the digital frequency converter.



FIGS. 10A, 10B, 10C, and 10D are graphs illustrating an in-phase local oscillator signal, a quadrature-phase local oscillator signal, an in-phase down-converter output signal, and a quadrature-phase down-converter output signal, respectively, shown in FIG. 9 according to one embodiment of the RF communications system.



FIGS. 11A, 11B, 11C, and 11D are graphs illustrating the in-phase local oscillator signal, the quadrature-phase local oscillator signal, the in-phase down-converter output signal, and the quadrature-phase down-converter output signal, respectively, shown in FIG. 9 according to an alternate embodiment of the RF communications system.



FIG. 12 illustrates a process for processing an in-phase down-converter output signal and a quadrature-phase down-converter output signal illustrated in FIG. 9 according to one embodiment of the digital frequency converter.



FIG. 13 illustrates a process for processing the in-phase down-converter output signal and the quadrature-phase down-converter output signal illustrated in FIG. 9 according to an alternate embodiment of the digital frequency converter.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

The embodiments set forth below represent the necessary information to enable those skilled in the art to practice the disclosure and illustrate the best mode of practicing the disclosure. Upon reading the following description in light of the accompanying drawing figures, those skilled in the art will understand the concepts of the disclosure and will recognize applications of these concepts not particularly addressed herein. It should be understood that these concepts and applications fall within the scope of the disclosure and the accompanying claims.


Embodiments of the present disclosure relate to a method and an apparatus for measuring a complex gain of a transmit path. Circuitry includes an IQ to RF modulator, an RF to IQ down-converter, and a digital frequency converter. During a test mode, the IQ to RF modulator modulates a quadrature RF carrier signal using a quadrature test signal. During the test mode, the RF to IQ down-converter down-converts a down-converter RF input signal to provide a quadrature down-converter output signal using the quadrature RF carrier signal. The down-converter RF input signal is based on the quadrature test signal and the complex gain of the transmit path. During the test mode, the digital frequency converter frequency converts the quadrature down-converter output signal to provide an averaged frequency converter output signal, which is a quadrature DC signal that is representative of an amplitude and phase of the quadrature test signal and the complex gain of the transmit path. The quadrature down-converter output signal is synchronized to the quadrature test signal. A measured complex gain of the transmit path is based on the amplitude and phase of the quadrature test signal and the averaged frequency converter output signal.


The RF to IQ down-converter is part of an IQ receiver, which may be relatively inexpensive. Such IQ receivers may have certain shortcomings, such as RF carrier leakage, interference from RF images, and the like, that adversely affect complex gain measurements. However, by incorporating the digital frequency converter into the IQ receiver and using a special test signal, as described, the effects of such shortcomings are significantly reduced, thereby ruggedizing the IQ receiver when making complex gain measurements.



FIG. 1 shows an RF communications system 10 during a test mode according to one embodiment of the RF communications system 10. The RF communications system 10 includes antenna facing circuitry 12, which includes an IQ to RF modulator 14, a transmit path 16, an RF to IQ down-converter 18, a digital frequency converter 20, a quadrature local oscillator 22, a quadrature digital to analog converter (DAC) 24, and control circuitry 26. The transmit path 16 includes an RF coupler 28. The RF communications system 10 further includes an RF antenna 30. In one embodiment of the transmit path 16, the transmit path 16 is an uplink path. The transmit path 16 is coupled between the IQ to RF modulator 14 and the RF antenna 30. The transmit path 16 may further include portions of or all of one or more RF amplifier stages, RF switching circuitry, RF filter circuitry, one or more RF diplexers, one or more RF duplexers, other RF filtering, impedance matching circuitry, other RF front-end circuitry, the like, or any combination thereof coupled in series with the RF coupler 28. During the test mode, the RF communications system 10 functions to measure a complex gain of the transmit path 16.


The control circuitry 26 selects one of the test mode and a normal operating mode. As such, the antenna facing circuitry 12 operates in the selected one of the test mode and the normal operating mode. In one embodiment of the RF communications system 10, during the test mode, the control circuitry 26 provides a digital quadrature test signal DTS to the quadrature DAC 24, which converts the digital quadrature test signal DTS from a digital signal into an analog signal. Further, the control circuitry 26 provides a quadrature local oscillator signal QLS to the digital frequency converter 20. The quadrature local oscillator signal QLS is a digital signal. Specifically, during the test mode, the quadrature DAC 24 receives and digital-to-analog converts the digital quadrature test signal DTS to provide a quadrature test signal QTS, which is an analog signal, to the IQ to RF modulator 14.


During the test mode, the quadrature local oscillator 22 provides a quadrature RF carrier signal QCS to the IQ to RF modulator 14 and to the RF to IQ down-converter 18. During the test mode, the IQ to RF modulator 14 modulates the quadrature RF carrier signal QCS using the quadrature test signal QTS to provide a RF modulator output signal MOS to the transmit path 16. During the test mode, the RF coupler 28 couples a portion of an RF signal flowing through the RF coupler 28 to provide a down-converter RF input signal DIS to the RF to IQ down-converter 18. The RF signal flowing through the RF coupler 28 is based on the RF modulator output signal MOS. As such, the RF signal flowing through the RF coupler 28 is representative of the quadrature test signal QTS and the complex gain of the transmit path 16. In this regard, the portion of an RF signal flowing through the RF coupler 28 and the down-converter RF input signal DIS are also representative of the quadrature test signal QTS and the complex gain of the transmit path 16. Further, the down-converter RF input signal DIS is based on the quadrature test signal QTS and the complex gain of the transmit path 16.


During the test mode, the RF to IQ down-converter 18 down-converts the down-converter RF input signal DIS to provide a quadrature down-converter output signal QDO using the quadrature RF carrier signal QCS. In this regard, the quadrature down-converter output signal QDO is representative of an amplitude and phase of the quadrature test signal QTS and the complex gain of the transmit path 16. During the test mode, the digital frequency converter 20 frequency converts the quadrature down-converter output signal QDO to provide an averaged frequency converter output signal AFC to the control circuitry 26 using the quadrature local oscillator signal QLS. The quadrature down-converter output signal ODD is synchronized to the quadrature test signal QTS. As such, the averaged frequency converter output signal AFC is a quadrature DC signal that is representative of an amplitude and phase of the quadrature test signal QTS and the complex gain of the transmit path 16. Specifically, a measured complex gain of the transmit path 16 is based on an amplitude and phase of the quadrature test signal QTS, which correlates to an amplitude and phase of the digital quadrature test signal DTS, and a magnitude and phase of the averaged frequency converter output signal AFC. Therefore, the control circuitry 26 may determine the measured complex gain of the transmit path 16 based on the quadrature local oscillator signal QLS and the averaged frequency converter output signal AFC.



FIG. 2 shows the RF communications system 10 during the test mode according to an alternate embodiment of the RF communications system 10. The RF communications system 10 illustrated in FIG. 2 is similar to the RF communications system 10 illustrated in FIG. 1, except the RF communications system 10 illustrated in FIG. 2 further includes baseband facing circuitry 32. The antenna facing circuitry 12 includes the IQ to RF modulator 14, the transmit path 16, the RF to IQ down-converter 18, and the quadrature local oscillator 22, whereas the baseband facing circuitry 32 includes the digital frequency converter 20, the quadrature DAC 24, and the control circuitry 26.


Other embodiments of the RF communications system 10 may have different allocations of the IQ to RF modulator 14, the transmit path 16, the RF to IQ down-converter 18, the digital frequency converter 20, the quadrature local oscillator 22, the quadrature DAC 24, and the control circuitry 26 between the antenna facing circuitry 12 and the baseband facing circuitry 32. In one embodiment of the antenna facing circuitry 12, an RF front-end module provides the antenna facing circuitry 12. The RF front-end module includes at least one integrated circuit (IC). In one embodiment of the baseband facing circuitry 32, a baseband controller provides the baseband facing circuitry 32. The baseband controller includes at least one IC. In an alternate embodiment of the baseband facing circuitry 32, transceiver circuitry provides the baseband facing circuitry 32. The transceiver circuitry includes at least one IC.



FIG. 3 shows the RF communications system 10 during the test mode according to an additional embodiment of the RF communications system 10. The RF communications system 10 illustrated in FIG. 3 is similar to the RF communications system 10 illustrated in FIG. 1, except the RF communications system 10 illustrated in FIG. 3 further includes the baseband facing circuitry 32 and the antenna facing circuitry 12 further includes a digital multiplexer 34. The baseband facing circuitry 32 includes baseband facing control circuitry 36, which is coupled to the control circuitry 26 via a digital communications bus 38. As such, the control circuitry 26 and the baseband facing control circuitry 36 can communicate with one another via the digital communications bus 38.


Both the antenna facing circuitry 12 and the baseband facing circuitry 32 operate in the selected one of the test mode and the normal operating mode. In one embodiment of the RF communications system 10, the baseband facing control circuitry 36 selects the one of the test mode and the normal operating mode and indicates the mode selection using the digital communications bus 38. During the test mode, the control circuitry 26 provides the digital quadrature test signal DTS to the digital multiplexer 34. During the normal operating mode, the baseband facing control circuitry 36 provides a digital quadrature transmit signal DTX to the digital multiplexer 34.


The digital multiplexer 34 provides a digital multiplexer output signal DMX to the quadrature DAC 24 based on forwarding either the digital quadrature test signal DTS or the digital quadrature transmit signal DTX. Specifically, during the test mode, the digital multiplexer 34 forwards the digital quadrature test signal DTS to provide the digital multiplexer output signal DMX. During the normal operating mode, the digital multiplexer 34 forwards the digital quadrature transmit signal DTX to provide the digital multiplexer output signal DMX. In an alternate embodiment of the RF communications system 10, during the normal operating mode, the baseband facing control circuitry 36 provides the digital quadrature transmit signal DTX to the digital multiplexer 34 via the digital communications bus 38 and the control circuitry 26. During the test mode, since the digital multiplexer output signal DMX is based on the digital quadrature test signal DTS, the quadrature DAC 24 receives and digital-to-analog converts the digital multiplexer output signal DMX to provide the quadrature test signal QTS.



FIG. 4 shows the RF communications system 10 during the normal operating mode according to another embodiment of the RF communications system 10. The RF communications system 10 illustrated in FIG. 4 is similar to the RF communications system 10, except during the normal operating mode, the baseband facing control circuitry 36 provides the digital quadrature transmit signal DTX to the digital multiplexer 34. During the normal operating mode, the digital multiplexer 34 forwards the digital quadrature transmit signal DTX to provide the digital multiplexer output signal DMX. The quadrature DAC 24 receives and digital-to-analog converts the digital multiplexer output signal DMX to provide a quadrature transmit signal QTX instead of the quadrature test signal QTS.


Processing of the quadrature transmit signal QTX by the IQ to RF modulator 14 and the transmit path 16 during the normal operating mode may be similar to processing of the quadrature test signal QTS during the test mode. However, processing of the quadrature transmit signal QTX may include processing and forwarding the quadrature transmit signal QTX to the RF antenna 30. In one embodiment of the antenna facing circuitry 12, during the normal operating mode, feedback is used to feed a processed portion of the digital quadrature transmit signal QTX to the control circuitry 26 via the RF to IQ down-converter 18 and the digital frequency converter 20. In an alternate embodiment of the antenna facing circuitry 12, during the normal operating mode, feedback is not used. As such, during the normal operating mode, the RF to IQ down-converter 18 and the digital frequency converter 20 are not used.


During the normal operating mode, the IQ to RF modulator 14 RF modulates the quadrature RF carrier signal QCS using the quadrature transmit signal QTX to provide the RF modulator output signal MOS to the transmit path 16. Further, in one embodiment of the antenna facing circuitry 12, during the normal operating mode, the RF modulator output signal MOS is processed and forwarded to the RF antenna 30 via the transmit path 16.



FIG. 5 illustrates a process for measuring the complex gain of the transmit path 16 illustrated in FIG. 1 according to one embodiment of the RF communications system 10. In this regard, all signals and apparatus elements in the process are illustrated in FIG. 1. The process begins by modulating the quadrature RF carrier signal QCS using the quadrature test signal QTS (Step A10). The process continues by down-converting the down-converter RF input signal DIS to provide the quadrature down-converter output signal ODD, such that the down-converter RF input signal DIS is based on the quadrature test signal OTS and the complex gain of the transmit path 16 (Step A12).


The process progresses by frequency converting the quadrature down-converter output signal ODD to provide the averaged frequency converter output signal AFC, which is a quadrature DC signal that is representative of the amplitude and phase of the quadrature test signal QTS and the complex gain of the transmit path 16, such that the quadrature down-converter output signal ODD is synchronized to the quadrature test signal QTS (Step A14). The process concludes by extracting the complex gain of the transmit path 16 based on the amplitude and phase of the quadrature test signal QTS and the magnitude and phase of the averaged frequency converter output signal AFC (Step A16).



FIG. 6 shows the RF communications system 10 during the test mode according to a further embodiment of the RF communications system 10. The RF communications system 10 illustrated in FIG. 6 is similar to the RF communications system 10 illustrated in FIG. 1, except the RF communications system 10 illustrated in FIG. 6 shows details of the control circuitry 26 and details of the digital quadrature test signal DTS, the quadrature test signal QTS, the quadrature RF carrier signal QCS, the quadrature down-converter output signal (MO, and the averaged frequency converter output signal AFC. The digital quadrature test signal DTS has a digital in-phase test signal DTI and a digital quadrature-phase test signal DTQ. The quadrature test signal QTS has an in-phase test signal TSI and a quadrature-phase test signal TSQ.


A continuous wave (CW) signal is defined as an un-modulated signal of constant amplitude and frequency. In a first embodiment of the RF communications system 10, during the test mode, the digital in-phase test signal DTI is a CW signal and the digital quadrature-phase test signal DTQ is a CW signal, such that an amplitude of the digital quadrature-phase test signal DTQ is about equal to an amplitude of the digital in-phase test signal DTI. Further, the digital quadrature-phase test signal DTQ is phase-shifted from the digital in-phase test signal DTI by about 90 degrees. Therefore, both the in-phase test signal TSI and the quadrature-phase test signal TSQ are CW signals, such that an amplitude of the quadrature-phase test signal TSQ is about equal to an amplitude of the in-phase test signal TSI. Further, the quadrature-phase test signal TSQ is phase-shifted from the in-phase test signal TSI by about 90 degrees.


The quadrature RF carrier signal QCS has an in-phase carrier signal CSI and a quadrature-phase carrier signal CSQ. In the first embodiment of the RF communications system 10, during the test mode, the in-phase carrier signal CSI and the quadrature-phase carrier signal CSQ are both CW signals, such that an amplitude of the quadrature-phase carrier signal CSQ is about equal to an amplitude of the in-phase carrier signal CSI. Further, the quadrature-phase carrier signal CSQ is phase-shifted from the in-phase carrier signal CSI by about 90 degrees.


The control circuitry 26 includes a digital local oscillator 40, a digital up-converter 42, and a control circuitry subset 44. During the test mode, the digital local oscillator 40 provides a quadrature local oscillator signal QLS to the digital frequency converter 20 and to the digital up-converter 42. The quadrature local oscillator signal QLS has an in-phase local oscillator signal LSI and a quadrature-phase local oscillator signal LSQ. In the first embodiment of the RF communications system 10, during the test mode, the in-phase local oscillator signal LSI and the quadrature-phase local oscillator signal LSQ are both CW signals, such that an amplitude of the quadrature-phase local oscillator signal LSQ is about equal to an amplitude of the in-phase local oscillator signal LSI. Further, the quadrature-phase local oscillator signal LSQ is phase-shifted from the in-phase local oscillator signal LSI by about 90 degrees.


During the test mode, the control circuitry subset 44 provides a digital test magnitude signal DTM to the digital up-converter 42. The digital up-converter 42 up-converts the digital test magnitude signal DTM using the quadrature local oscillator signal QLS to provide the digital quadrature test signal DTS. In one embodiment of the digital up-converter 42, the digital up-converter 42 provides the digital in-phase test signal DTI based on the in-phase local oscillator signal LSI and provides the digital quadrature-phase test signal DTQ based on the quadrature-phase local oscillator signal LSQ, such that magnitudes of the digital in-phase test signal DTI and the digital quadrature-phase test signal DTQ are based on the digital test magnitude signal DTM. Further, a frequency of the digital in-phase test signal DTI is about equal to a frequency of the in-phase local oscillator signal LSI, and a frequency of the digital quadrature-phase test signal DTQ is about equal to a frequency of the quadrature-phase local oscillator signal LSQ.


In a first embodiment of the digital up-converter 42, the digital in-phase test signal DTI is phase-shifted from the in-phase local oscillator signal LSI by about 180 degrees, and the digital quadrature-phase test signal DTQ is phase-shifted from the quadrature-phase local oscillator signal LSQ by about 180 degrees. In a second embodiment of the digital up-converter 42, the digital in-phase test signal DTI is about phase-aligned with the in-phase local oscillator signal LSI, and the digital quadrature-phase test signal DTQ is about phase-aligned with the quadrature-phase local oscillator signal LSQ.


The quadrature down-converter output signal QDO has an in-phase down-converter output signal DOI and a quadrature-phase down-converter output signal DOQ. The averaged frequency converter output signal AFC has an in-phase frequency converter output signal FCI and a quadrature-phase frequency converter output signal FCQ. Further, the digital frequency converter 20 provides the averaged frequency converter output signal AFC to the control circuitry subset 44.



FIG. 7 shows details of the IQ to RF modulator 14 illustrated in FIG. 6 according to one embodiment of the IQ to RF modulator 14. The IQ to RF modulator 14 includes a first in-phase RF mixer 46, a first quadrature-phase RF mixer 48, and an RF combiner 50. During the test mode, the first in-phase RF mixer 46 RF modulates the in-phase carrier signal CSI using the in-phase test signal TSI by mixing the in-phase carrier signal CSI and the in-phase test signal TSI to provide an in-phase RF signal RFI. During the test mode, the first quadrature-phase RF mixer 48 RF modulates the quadrature-phase carrier signal CSQ using the quadrature-phase test signal TSQ by mixing the quadrature-phase carrier signal CSQ and the quadrature-phase test signal TSQ to provide a quadrature-phase RF signal RFQ. During the test mode, the RF combiner 50 receives and combines the in-phase RF signal RFI and the quadrature-phase RF signal RFQ to provide the RF modulator output signal MOS.



FIG. 8 shows details of the RF to IQ down-converter 18 illustrated in FIG. 6 according to one embodiment of the RF to IQ down-converter 18. The RF to IQ down-converter 18 includes a second in-phase RF mixer 52, a second quadrature-phase RF mixer 54, and an RF splitter 56. During the test mode, the RF splitter 56 receives and splits the down-converter RF input signal DIS to provide an in-phase side RF signal RSI and a quadrature-phase side RF signal RSQ. During the test mode, the second in-phase RF mixer 52 down-converts the in-phase side RF signal RSI using the in-phase carrier signal CSI by mixing the in-phase side RF signal RSI and the in-phase carrier signal CSI to provide the in-phase down-converter output signal DOI. During the test mode, the second quadrature-phase RF mixer 54 down-converts the quadrature-phase side RF signal RSQ using the quadrature-phase carrier signal CSQ by mixing the quadrature-phase side RF signal RSQ and the quadrature-phase carrier signal CSQ to provide the quadrature-phase down-converter output signal DOQ.



FIG. 9 shows details of the digital frequency converter 20 illustrated in FIG. 6 according to one embodiment of the digital frequency converter 20. The digital frequency converter 20 includes a quadrature analog-to-digital converter (ADC) 58, a complex multiplier 60, and averaging circuitry 62. During the test mode, the quadrature ADC 58 receives and analog-to-digital converts the quadrature down-converter output signal QDO to provide a digital quadrature down-converter signal DDO. The quadrature down-converter output signal QDO has the in-phase down-converter output signal DOI and the quadrature-phase down-converter output signal DOQ. The digital quadrature down-converter signal DDO has a digital in-phase down-converter signal DDI and a digital quadrature-phase down-converter signal DDQ.


In this regard, the quadrature ADC 58 receives and analog-to-digital converts the in-phase down-converter output signal DOI to provide the digital in-phase down-converter signal DDI. Further, the quadrature ADC 58 receives and analog-to-digital converts the quadrature-phase down-converter output signal DOQ to provide the digital quadrature-phase down-converter signal DDQ. To provide accurate analog-to-digital conversions, a one-bit resolution of the quadrature ADC 58 needs to be small compared to an amplitude of the in-phase down-converter output signal DOI and to an amplitude of the quadrature-phase down-converter output signal DOQ.


During the test mode, the complex multiplier 60 receives and multiplies the digital quadrature down-converter signal DDO and the quadrature local oscillator signal QLS to provide a quadrature complex multiplier output signal CMO, which has an in-phase complex multiplier output signal CMI and a quadrature-phase complex multiplier output signal CMQ. The multiplication of the digital quadrature down-converter signal DDO and the quadrature local oscillator signal QLS is a complex multiplication. Since the digital quadrature test signal DTS is based on the quadrature local oscillator signal QLS, the multiplication of the digital quadrature down-converter signal DDO and the quadrature local oscillator signal QLS is synchronized to the digital quadrature test signal DTS. In this regard, during one embodiment of the complex multiplier 60, the complex multiplier 60 functions as a synchronous down-mixer of the quadrature test signal QTS (FIG. 6), which has a frequency offset. Therefore, the complex multiplier 60 synchronizes the quadrature down-converter output signal QDO to the quadrature test signal QTS (FIG. 6).


During the test mode, the averaging circuitry 62 receives and averages the quadrature complex multiplier output signal CMO to provide the averaged frequency converter output signal AFC. Specifically, the averaging circuitry 62 receives and averages the in-phase complex multiplier output signal CMI to provide the in-phase frequency converter output signal FCI, and receives and averages the quadrature-phase complex multiplier output signal CMQ to provide the quadrature-phase frequency converter output signal FCQ. By averaging the quadrature complex multiplier output signal CMO, negative effects of certain shortcomings of the RF to IQ down-converter 18 (FIG. 6) may be reduced. Such shortcomings may include RF carrier leakage between the quadrature local oscillator 22 (FIG. 6) and the RF to IQ down-converter 18 (FIG. 6), interference from RF images as a result of mixing, quadrature, mismatch in the RF to IQ down-converter 18 (FIG. 6), the like, or any combination thereof.


In one embodiment of the averaging circuitry 62, to minimize error, during the test mode, the averaging circuitry 62 averages the quadrature complex multiplier output signal CMO for an integer number of samples in one period of the digital quadrature test signal DTS (FIG. 6) and an integer number of periods of the digital quadrature test signal DTS (FIG. 6). In an alternate embodiment of the averaging circuitry 62, to minimize error, during the test mode, the averaging circuitry 62 averages the quadrature complex multiplier output signal CMO for a long time period relative to one period of the digital quadrature test signal DTS (FIG. 6).


An equation relating a magnitude of the averaged frequency converter output signal AFC to the complex gain of the transmit path 16 (FIG. 6) is presented. AFCM is a complex magnitude of the averaged frequency converter output signal AFC, which is a complex signal. DTSA is an amplitude of the digital quadrature test signal DTS (FIG. 6). GAIN is the measured complex gain of the transmit path 16 (FIG. 6). SF is a complex scaling factor. EQ. 1 is an equation for AFCM as shown below.

AFCM=GAIN×DTSA×SF.  EQ. 1


The complex scaling factor compensates for gains and losses in the signal path other than the complex gain of the transmit path 16 (FIG. 6). For example, the coupling factor of the RF coupler 28 (FIG. 6) would be included in the complex scaling factor. By re-arranging EQ. 1, EQ. 2 is an equation for measured complex gain of the transmit path 16 (FIG. 6) as shown below.

GAIN=AFCM/(DTSA×SF).  EQ. 2


To preserve information, in one embodiment of the RF communications system 10 (FIG. 6), a sampling rate of the quadrature ADC 58 is about equal to a sampling rate of the quadrature DAC 24 (FIG. 6). However, the complex multiplier 60 must perform a complex multiplication for each quadrature sample provided by the quadrature ADC 58.


Therefore, to reduce the computing load of the complex multiplier 60, in an alternate embodiment of the RF communications system 10 (FIG. 6), the sampling rate of the quadrature ADC 58 is less than the sampling rate of the quadrature DAC 24 (FIG. 6). In this regard, some information in the quadrature down-converter output signal QDO is discarded. However, by sampling the quadrature down-converter output signal QDO at specific times, much of the relevant information in the quadrature down-converter output signal QDO may be extracted.


There is a delay from the quadrature local oscillator signal QLS to correlating information in the quadrature down-converter output signal QDO. This delay is a processing delay and is a result of processing quadrature local oscillator signal QLS based signals through the digital up-converter 42 (FIG. 6), the quadrature DAC 24 (FIG. 6), the IQ to RF modulator 14 (FIG. 6), the transmit path 16, and the RF to IQ down-converter 18 (FIG. 6). Therefore, when the sampling rate of the quadrature ADC 58 is less than the sampling rate of the quadrature DAC 24 (FIG. 6), in one embodiment of the quadrature ADC 58, sampling by the quadrature ADC 58 is delayed to compensate for the processing delay in the RF communications system 10 (FIG. 6). To maximize extraction of useful information from the quadrature down-converter output signal QDO, in one embodiment of the quadrature ADC 58, the quadrature down-converter output signal QDO is sampled at correlating amplitude peaks of the in-phase local oscillator signal LSI and the quadrature-phase local oscillator signal LSQ.


As such, in a first embodiment of the quadrature ADC 58, the quadrature down-converter output signal QDO is sampled four times per period of the quadrature test signal QTS (FIG. 6). In a second embodiment of the quadrature ADC 58, the quadrature down-converter output signal QDO is sampled eight times per period of the quadrature test signal OTS (FIG. 6). In a third embodiment of the quadrature ADC 58, the quadrature down-converter output signal QDO is sampled sixteen times per period of the quadrature test signal QTS (FIG. 6). In a fourth embodiment of the quadrature ADC 58, the quadrature down-converter output signal QDO is sampled thirty-two times per period of the quadrature test signal QTS (FIG. 6).



FIGS. 10A, 10B, 10C, and 10D are graphs illustrating the in-phase local oscillator signal LSI, the quadrature-phase local oscillator signal LSQ, the in-phase down-converter output signal DOI, and the quadrature-phase down-converter output signal DOQ, respectively, shown in FIG. 9 according to one embodiment of the RF communications system 10 (FIG. 6). Both the in-phase local oscillator signal LSI and the quadrature-phase local oscillator signal LSQ have a quadrature leg amplitude 64. The in-phase local oscillator signal LSI has a positive in-phase amplitude peak 66 and a negative in-phase amplitude peak 68. The quadrature-phase local oscillator signal LSQ has a positive quadrature-phase amplitude peak 70 and a negative quadrature-phase amplitude peak 72.


In the embodiment of the RF communications system 10 (FIG. 6) illustrated in FIGS. 10A, 10B, 10C, and 10D, the quadrature-phase test signal TSQ (FIG. 6) is phase-shifted from the in-phase test signal TSI (FIG. 6) by about 90 degrees and the quadrature-phase local oscillator signal LSQ is phase-shifted from the in-phase local oscillator signal LSI by about 90 degrees. The in-phase local oscillator signal LSI is about phase-aligned with the in-phase test signal TSI (FIG. 6). However, the quadrature-phase test signal TSQ (FIG. 6) is phase-shifted from the quadrature local oscillator signal QLS by about 180 degrees. The digital up-converter 42 (FIG. 6) provides the 180 degree phase-shift between the quadrature-phase test signal TSQ (FIG. 6) and the quadrature local oscillator signal QLS.


As such, the quadrature-phase test signal TSQ and the quadrature local oscillator signal QLS have counter-rotating IQ vectors. The counter-rotating IQ vectors allow the complex multiplier 60 (FIG. 9) to synchronously down-mix the quadrature local oscillator signal QLS (FIG. 9) and the quadrature test signal embedded in the quadrature down-converter output signal QDO (FIG. 9) to extract the complex gain of the transmit path 16 (FIG. 6) regardless of phase-alignment of the quadrature test signal and the quadrature local oscillator signal QLS (FIG. 6). Therefore, the processing delay that was previously discussed does not affect the synchronous down-mixing. However, alternative embodiments of the RF communications system 10 (FIG. 6) that do not incorporate counter-rotating IQ vectors may need to compensate for the effects of processing delay.


The in-phase down-converter output signal DOI and the quadrature-phase down-converter output signal DOQ both illustrate information that correlates with the in-phase local oscillator signal LSI and the quadrature-phase local oscillator signal LSQ, respectively. The correlating information in the in-phase down-converter output signal DOI and the quadrature-phase down-converter output signal DOQ is delayed from the in-phase local oscillator signal LSI and the quadrature-phase local oscillator signal LSQ due to the processing delay. As a result, in embodiments of the RF communications system 10 (FIG. 6) that do not incorporate counter-rotating IQ vectors, sampling by the quadrature ADC 58 may need to be delayed by a sample delay 74 to align the correlating information in the in-phase down-converter output signal DOI and the quadrature-phase down-converter output signal DOQ with the in-phase local oscillator signal LSI and the quadrature-phase local oscillator signal LSQ, respectively.


The in-phase down-converter output signal DOI and the quadrature-phase down-converter output signal DOQ have a sample period 76, which is about equal to a period of the quadrature local oscillator signal QLS. The in-phase down-converter output signal DOI and the quadrature-phase down-converter output signal DOQ are sampled four times per sample period 76. A first sample 78 of the in-phase down-converter output signal DOI and the quadrature-phase down-converter output signal DOQ is taken when the in-phase down-converter output signal DOI correlates to the positive in-phase amplitude peak 66. A second sample 80 of the in-phase down-converter output signal DOI and the quadrature-phase down-converter output signal DOQ is taken when the quadrature-phase down-converter output signal DOQ correlates to the positive quadrature-phase amplitude peak 70. A third sample 82 of the in-phase down-converter output signal DOI and the quadrature-phase down-converter output signal DOQ is taken when the in-phase down-converter output signal DOI correlates to the negative in-phase amplitude peak 68. A fourth sample 84 of the in-phase down-converter output signal DOI and the quadrature-phase down-converter output signal DOQ is taken when the quadrature-phase down-converter output signal DOQ correlates to the negative quadrature-phase amplitude peak 72.


The first sample 78 of the in-phase down-converter output signal DOI has a first sample in-phase magnitude 86. The first sample 78 of the quadrature-phase down-converter output signal DOQ has a first sample quadrature-phase magnitude 88. The second sample 80 of the in-phase down-converter output signal DOI has a second sample in-phase magnitude 90. The second sample 80 of the quadrature-phase down-converter output signal DOQ has a second sample quadrature-phase magnitude 92. The third sample 82 of the in-phase down-converter output signal DOI has a third sample in-phase magnitude 94. The third sample 82 of the quadrature-phase down-converter output signal DOQ has a third sample quadrature-phase magnitude 96. The fourth sample 84 of the in-phase down-converter output signal DOI has a fourth sample in-phase magnitude 98. The fourth sample 84 of the quadrature-phase down-converter output signal DOQ has a fourth sample quadrature-phase magnitude 100.


To simplify the complex multiplier 60 (FIG. 9), the quadrature leg amplitude 64 (FIG. 10A) is scaled to be 1. In one embodiment of the RF communications system 10 (FIG. 6), to simplify the complex multiplier 60 (FIG. 9), during multiplication of the digital quadrature down-converter signal DDO (FIG. 9) and the quadrature local oscillator signal QLS (FIG. 9), a magnitude of the in-phase local oscillator signal LSI is 1, 0, or −1 and a magnitude of the quadrature-phase local oscillator signal LSQ is 1, 0, or −1.


Returning to FIG. 9, the complex multiplier 60 performs a complex multiplication of the quadrature local oscillator signal QLS times the digital quadrature down-converter signal DDO to provide the quadrature complex multiplier output signal CMO. As such, in one embodiment of the RF communications system 10 (FIG. 6), the quadrature local oscillator signal QLS may be represented as LSI+jLSQ, the digital quadrature down-converter signal DDO may be represented as DDI+jDDQ, and the quadrature complex multiplier output signal CMO may be represented as CMI+jCMQ. Further, the first sample in-phase magnitude 86 is represented as “86”. The first sample quadrature-phase magnitude 88 is represented as “88”. The second sample in-phase magnitude 90 is represented as “90”. The second sample quadrature-phase magnitude 92 is represented as “92”. The third sample in-phase magnitude 94 is represented as “94”. The third sample quadrature-phase magnitude 96 is represented as “96”. The fourth sample in-phase magnitude 98 is represented as “98”. The fourth sample quadrature-phase magnitude 100 is represented as “100”.


In this regard, the table below shows magnitudes of the in-phase local oscillator signal LSI, the quadrature-phase local oscillator signal LSQ, the digital in-phase down-converter signal DDI, the digital quadrature-phase down-converter signal DDQ, the in-phase complex multiplier output signal CMI, and the quadrature-phase complex multiplier output signal CMQ during the four samples previously described. To simplify calculations, the quadrature leg amplitude 64 (FIG. 10A) is scaled to be 1.


















SAMPLE
LSI
LSQ
DDI
DDQ
CMI
CMQ





















FIRST
1
0
“86”
 “88”
   “86”
  “88”


SECOND
0
−1
“90”
 “92”
 “−92”
  “90”


THIRD
−1
0
“94”
 “96”
 −“94”
−“96”


FOURTH
0
1
“98”
“100”
  “100”
“−98”









From the table, the in-phase complex multiplier output signal CMI and the quadrature-phase complex multiplier output signal CMQ are easily provided by the complex multiplier 60. In one embodiment of the complex multiplier 60, for the first sample, the complex multiplier 60 need only forward the digital in-phase down-converter signal DDI to provide the in-phase complex multiplier output signal CMI and forward the digital quadrature-phase down-converter signal DDQ to provide the quadrature-phase complex multiplier output signal CMQ.


For the second sample, the complex multiplier 60 need only negate and forward the digital quadrature-phase down-converter signal DDQ to provide the in-phase complex multiplier output signal CMI, and forward the digital in-phase down-converter signal DDI to provide the quadrature-phase complex multiplier output signal CMQ. For the third sample, the complex multiplier 60 need only negate and forward the digital in-phase down-converter signal DDI to provide the in-phase complex multiplier output signal CMI, and negate and forward the digital quadrature-phase down-converter signal DDQ to provide the quadrature-phase complex multiplier output signal CMQ. For the fourth sample, the complex multiplier 60 need only negate and forward the digital in-phase down-converter signal DDI to provide the quadrature-phase complex multiplier output signal CMQ, and forward the digital quadrature-phase down-converter signal DDQ to provide the in-phase complex multiplier output signal CMI.



FIGS. 11A, 11B, 11C, and 11D are graphs illustrating the in-phase local oscillator signal LSI, the quadrature-phase local oscillator signal LSQ, the in-phase down-converter output signal DOI, and the quadrature-phase down-converter output signal DOQ, respectively, shown in FIG. 9 according to an alternate embodiment of the RF communications system 10 (FIG. 6). The in-phase local oscillator signal LSI, the quadrature-phase local oscillator signal LSQ, the in-phase down-converter output signal DOI, and the quadrature-phase down-converter output signal DOQ illustrated in FIGS. 11A, 11B, 11C, and 11D are similar to the in-phase local oscillator signal LSI, the quadrature-phase local oscillator signal LSQ, the in-phase down-converter output signal DOI, and the quadrature-phase down-converter output signal DOQ illustrated in FIGS. 10A, 10B, 10C, and 10D, except the in-phase local oscillator signal LSI, the quadrature-phase local oscillator signal LSQ, the in-phase down-converter output signal DOI, and the quadrature-phase down-converter output signal DOQ illustrated in FIGS. 10A, 10B, 10C, and 10D are sinusoidal signals, whereas the in-phase local oscillator signal LSI, the quadrature-phase local oscillator signal LSQ, the in-phase down-converter output signal DOI, and the quadrature-phase down-converter output signal DOQ illustrated in FIGS. 11A, 11B, 11C, and 11D are square-wave signals.


As such, the in-phase test signal TSI (FIG. 6) is approximately a square wave and the quadrature-phase test signal TSQ (FIG. 6) is approximately a square wave. In one embodiment of the RF communications system 10 (FIG. 6) sampling by the quadrature ADC 58 (FIG. 9) is delayed by the sample delay 74 to allow a steady-state to be reached before sampling the quadrature down-converter output signal QDO (FIG. 9). In this regard, after each transition of the phase test signal TSI (FIG. 6) is and the quadrature-phase test signal TSQ (FIG. 6), multiplication of the digital quadrature down-converter signal DDO (FIG. 9) and the quadrature local oscillator signal QLS (FIG. 9) occurs after a steady-state of the digital quadrature down-converter signal DDO (FIG. 9) is reached.


In one embodiment of the complex multiplier 60 (FIG. 9), if the averaging circuitry 62 (FIG. 9) is not capable of accepting negative values, the complex multiplier 60 (FIG. 9) could add the four samples together to provide a sum to the averaging circuitry 62 (FIG. 9). In this regard, the complex multiplier 60 (FIG. 9) may be fairly simple. In one embodiment of the complex multiplier 60 (FIG. 9), the complex multiplier 60 (FIG. 9) is implemented in software running on a processor, such as a micro-controller. In an alternate embodiment of the complex multiplier 60 (FIG. 9), the complex multiplier 60 includes multiplexers, digital summing circuitry (FIG. 9), digital difference circuitry, and the like.



FIG. 12 illustrates a process for processing the in-phase down-converter output signal DOI and the quadrature-phase down-converter output signal DOQ illustrated in FIG. 9 according to one embodiment of the digital frequency converter 20 (FIG. 9). This process may be part of the frequency converting the quadrature down-converter output signal QDO to provide the averaged frequency converter output signal AFC (Step A14) illustrated in FIG. 5. The process describes adding the four samples together to provide a sum to the averaging circuitry 62 (FIG. 9).


The process begins by providing and clearing an in-phase register (not shown) and a quadrature-phase register (not shown)(Step B10). The in-phase register (not shown) and the quadrature-phase register (not shown) are part of the complex multiplier 60 (FIG. 9). The process continues by sampling the in-phase down-converter output signal DOI (FIG. 9) and the quadrature-phase down-converter output signal DOQ (FIG. 9) using the quadrature ADC 58 (FIG. 9) to obtain a first in-phase sample and a first quadrature-phase sample, respectively (Step B12). The process progresses by adding the first in-phase sample to the in-phase register and adding the first quadrature-phase sample to the quadrature-phase register (Step B14).


The process continues by sampling the in-phase down-converter output signal DOI (FIG. 9) and the quadrature-phase down-converter output signal DOQ (FIG. 9) using the quadrature ADC 58 (FIG. 9) to obtain a second in-phase sample and a second quadrature-phase sample, respectively (Step B16). The process progresses by adding the second in-phase sample to the quadrature-phase register and subtracting the second quadrature-phase sample from the in-phase register (Step B18).


The process continues by sampling the in-phase down-converter output signal DOI (FIG. 9) and the quadrature-phase down-converter output signal DOQ (FIG. 9) using the quadrature ADC 58 (FIG. 9) to obtain a third in-phase sample and a third quadrature-phase sample, respectively (Step B20). The process progresses by subtracting the third in-phase sample from the in-phase register and subtracting the third quadrature-phase sample from the quadrature-phase register (Step B22).


The process continues by sampling the in-phase down-converter output signal DOI (FIG. 9) and the quadrature-phase down-converter output signal DOQ (FIG. 9) using the quadrature ADC 58 (FIG. 9) to obtain a fourth in-phase sample and a fourth quadrature-phase sample, respectively (Step B24). The process progresses by subtracting the fourth in-phase sample from the quadrature-phase register and adding the fourth quadrature-phase sample to the in-phase register (Step B26).


The process concludes by forwarding contents of the in-phase register and the quadrature-phase register to the averaging circuitry 62 (FIG. 9) via the in-phase complex multiplier output signal CMI (FIG. 9) and the quadrature-phase complex multiplier output signal CMQ (FIG. 9), respectively (Step B28).


As previously mentioned, in one embodiment of the RF communications system 10 (FIG. 6), the quadrature test signal QTS (FIG. 6) is based on the quadrature local oscillator signal QLS (FIG. 6) and there is a processing delay from the quadrature local oscillator signal QLS (FIG. 9) to correlating information in the in-phase down-converter output signal DOI (FIG. 9) and the quadrature-phase down-converter output signal DOQ (FIG. 9). Therefore, in one embodiment of the quadrature ADC 58 (FIG. 9), sampling by the quadrature ADC 58 (FIG. 9) is delayed to compensate for the processing delay in the RF communications system 10 (FIG. 6). In this regard, sampling the in-phase down-converter output signal DOI (FIG. 9) and the quadrature-phase down-converter output signal DOQ (FIG. 9) is delayed to compensate for the processing delay from the quadrature local oscillator signal QLS (FIG. 9) to correlating information in the in-phase down-converter output signal DOI (FIG. 9) and the quadrature-phase down-converter output signal DOQ (FIG. 9).



FIG. 13 illustrates a process for processing the in-phase down-converter output signal DOI and the quadrature-phase down-converter output signal DOQ illustrated in FIG. 9 according to an alternate embodiment of the digital frequency converter 20 (FIG. 9). This process may be part of the frequency converting the quadrature down-converter output signal QDO to provide the averaged frequency converter output signal AFC (Step A14) illustrated in FIG. 5. This process describes adding multiple samples together to provide a sum to the averaging circuitry 62 (FIG. 9). In this regard, this process illustrated in FIG. 13 is a generalized version of the process illustrated in FIG. 12.


The process begins by providing and clearing an in-phase register (not shown) and a quadrature-phase register (not shown)(Step 010). The in-phase register (not shown) and the quadrature-phase register (not shown) are part of the complex multiplier 60 (FIG. 9). The process continues by sampling the in-phase down-converter output signal DOI (FIG. 9) and the quadrature-phase down-converter output signal DOQ (FIG. 9) using the quadrature ADC 58 (FIG. 9) to obtain an in-phase sample and a quadrature-phase sample, respectively (Step C12). The process progresses by adding or subtracting the in-phase sample to or from, respectively, one of the in-phase register and the quadrature-phase register (Step C14). The process continues by adding or subtracting the quadrature-phase sample to or from, respectively, another of the in-phase register and the quadrature-phase register (Step C16). The process proceeds by repeating the sampling the in-phase down-converter output signal DOI (FIG. 9) and the quadrature-phase down-converter output signal DOQ (FIG. 9), the adding or subtracting the in-phase sample, and the adding or subtracting the quadrature-phase sample, as necessary (Step C18). The process concludes by forwarding contents of the in-phase register and the quadrature-phase register to the averaging circuitry 62 (FIG. 9) via the in-phase complex multiplier output signal CMI (FIG. 9) and the quadrature-phase complex multiplier output signal CMQ (FIG. 9), respectively (Step C20).


Those skilled in the art will recognize improvements and modifications to the preferred embodiments of the present disclosure. All such improvements and modifications are considered within the scope of the concepts disclosed herein and the claims that follow.

Claims
  • 1. Circuitry adapted to operate in one of a test mode and a normal operating mode, and comprising: an IQ to radio frequency modulator adapted to, during the test mode, modulate a quadrature radio frequency carrier signal using a quadrature test signal;a radio frequency to IQ down-converter adapted to, during the test mode, down-convert a down-converter radio frequency input signal to provide a quadrature down-converter output signal using the quadrature radio frequency carrier signal, such that the down-converter radio frequency input signal is based on the quadrature test signal and a complex gain of a transmit path; anda digital frequency converter adapted to, during the test mode, frequency convert the quadrature down-converter output signal to provide an averaged frequency converter output signal, which is a quadrature direct current signal that is representative of an amplitude and phase of the quadrature test signal and the complex gain of the transmit path, such that the quadrature down-converter output signal is synchronized to the quadrature test signal.
  • 2. The circuitry of claim 1 wherein a measured complex gain of the transmit path is based on an amplitude of the quadrature test signal and a magnitude of the averaged frequency converter output signal.
  • 3. The circuitry of claim 1 wherein the transmit path is an uplink path.
  • 4. The circuitry of claim 1 wherein the IQ to radio frequency modulator is further adapted to, during the normal operating mode, radio frequency modulate the quadrature radio frequency carrier signal using a quadrature transmit signal to provide a radio frequency modulator output signal to the transmit path.
  • 5. The circuitry of claim 4 wherein, during the normal operating mode, the radio frequency modulator output signal is processed and forwarded to a radio frequency antenna via the transmit path.
  • 6. The circuitry of claim 1 wherein during the test mode: the quadrature test signal has an in-phase test signal and a quadrature-phase test signal;the in-phase test signal and the quadrature-phase test signal are both continuous wave signals;an amplitude of the quadrature-phase test signal is about equal to an amplitude of the in-phase test signal; andthe quadrature-phase test signal is phase-shifted from the in-phase test signal by about 90 degrees.
  • 7. The circuitry of claim 1 wherein the digital frequency converter comprises: a quadrature analog-to-digital converter adapted to, during the test mode, receive and analog-to-digital convert the quadrature down-converter output signal to provide a digital quadrature down-converter signal; anda complex multiplier adapted to, during the test mode, receive and multiply the digital quadrature down-converter signal and a quadrature local oscillator signal to provide a quadrature complex multiplier output signal, wherein multiplication of the digital quadrature down-converter signal and the quadrature local oscillator signal is a complex multiplication.
  • 8. The circuitry of claim 7 wherein the digital frequency converter further comprises averaging circuitry adapted to, during the test mode, receive and average the quadrature complex multiplier output signal to provide the averaged frequency converter output signal.
  • 9. The circuitry of claim 7 wherein the complex multiplier is further adapted to, during the test mode, function as a synchronous down-mixer of the quadrature test signal.
  • 10. The circuitry of claim 7 wherein the complex multiplier is further adapted to, during the test mode, synchronize the quadrature down-converter output signal to the quadrature test signal.
  • 11. The circuitry of claim 7 wherein: the quadrature local oscillator signal has an in-phase local oscillator signal and a quadrature-phase local oscillator signal;during the multiplication of the digital quadrature down-converter signal and the quadrature local oscillator signal, a magnitude of the in-phase local oscillator signal is equal to one of 1, 0, and −1; andduring the multiplication of the digital quadrature down-converter signal and the quadrature local oscillator signal, a magnitude of the quadrature-phase local oscillator signal is equal to one of 1, 0, and −1.
  • 12. The circuitry of claim 7 wherein: the quadrature local oscillator signal has an in-phase local oscillator signal and a quadrature-phase local oscillator signal;the quadrature test signal has an in-phase test signal and a quadrature-phase test signal;the quadrature-phase test signal is phase-shifted from the in-phase test signal by about 90 degrees;the quadrature-phase local oscillator signal is phase-shifted from the in-phase local oscillator signal by about 90 degrees; andthe quadrature-phase test signal is phase-shifted from the quadrature-phase local oscillator signal by about 180 degrees.
  • 13. The circuitry of claim 7 wherein: the quadrature test signal has an in-phase test signal and a quadrature-phase test signal;each of the in-phase test signal and the quadrature-phase test signal is approximately a square wave; andafter each transition of the in-phase test signal and the quadrature-phase test signal, the multiplication of the digital quadrature down-converter signal and the quadrature local oscillator signal occurs after a steady-state of the digital quadrature down-converter signal is reached.
  • 14. A method for measuring a complex gain of a transmit path comprising: modulating a quadrature radio frequency carrier signal using a quadrature test signal;down-converting a down-converter radio frequency input signal to provide a quadrature down-converter output signal using the quadrature radio frequency carrier signal, such that the down-converter radio frequency input signal is based on the quadrature test signal and the complex gain of the transmit path;frequency converting the quadrature down-converter output signal to provide an averaged frequency converter output signal, which is a quadrature direct current signal that is representative of an amplitude and phase of the quadrature test signal and the complex gain of the transmit path, such that the quadrature down-converter output signal is synchronized to the quadrature test signal; andextracting the complex gain of the transmit path based on the amplitude and phase of the quadrature test signal and a magnitude and phase of the averaged frequency converter output signal.
  • 15. The method of claim 14 wherein the frequency converting the quadrature down-converter output signal to provide the averaged frequency converter output signal comprises: providing and clearing an in-phase register and a quadrature-phase register;sampling an in-phase down-converter output signal and a quadrature-phase down-converter output signal using a quadrature analog-to-digital converter to obtain a first in-phase sample and a first quadrature-phase sample, respectively;adding the first in-phase sample to the in-phase register and adding the first quadrature-phase sample to the quadrature-phase register;sampling the in-phase down-converter output signal and the quadrature-phase down-converter output signal using the quadrature analog-to-digital converter to obtain a second in-phase sample and a second quadrature-phase sample, respectively;adding the second in-phase sample to the quadrature-phase register and subtracting the second quadrature-phase sample from the in-phase register;sampling the in-phase down-converter output signal and the quadrature-phase down-converter output signal using the quadrature analog-to-digital converter to obtain a third in-phase sample and a third quadrature-phase sample, respectively;subtracting the third in-phase sample from the in-phase register and subtracting the third quadrature-phase sample from the quadrature-phase register;sampling the in-phase down-converter output signal and the quadrature-phase down-converter output signal using the quadrature analog-to-digital converter to obtain a fourth in-phase sample and a fourth quadrature-phase sample, respectively;subtracting the fourth in-phase sample from the quadrature-phase register and adding the fourth quadrature-phase sample to the in-phase register; andforwarding contents of the in-phase register and the quadrature-phase register to averaging circuitry via an in-phase complex multiplier output signal and a quadrature-phase complex multiplier output signal, respectively.
  • 16. The method of claim 15 wherein the frequency converting the quadrature down-converter output signal to provide the averaged frequency converter output signal further comprises receiving and averaging a quadrature complex multiplier output signal to provide the averaged frequency converter output signal, such that the averaged frequency converter output signal has the in-phase complex multiplier output signal and the quadrature-phase complex multiplier output signal.
  • 17. The method of claim 14 wherein the frequency converting the quadrature down-converter output signal to provide the averaged frequency converter output signal comprises: providing and clearing an in-phase register and a quadrature-phase register;sampling an in-phase down-converter output signal and a quadrature-phase down-converter output signal using a quadrature analog-to-digital converter to obtain an in-phase sample and a quadrature-phase sample, respectively;adding or subtracting the in-phase sample to or from, respectively, one of the in-phase register and the quadrature-phase register;adding or subtracting the quadrature-phase sample to or from, respectively, another of the in-phase register and the quadrature-phase register;repeating the sampling the in-phase down-converter output signal and the quadrature-phase down-converter output signal, the adding or subtracting the in-phase sample, and the adding or subtracting the quadrature-phase sample, as necessary; andforwarding contents of the in-phase register and the quadrature-phase register to averaging circuitry via an in-phase complex multiplier output signal and a quadrature-phase complex multiplier output signal, respectively.
  • 18. The method of claim 17 wherein the frequency converting the quadrature down-converter output signal to provide the averaged frequency converter output signal further comprises receiving and averaging a quadrature complex multiplier output signal to provide the averaged frequency converter output signal, such that the averaged frequency converter output signal has the in-phase complex multiplier output signal and the quadrature-phase complex multiplier output signal.
  • 19. Antenna facing circuitry configured to operate in one of a test mode and a normal operating mode, and comprising: an IQ to radio frequency modulator configured to, during the test mode, modulate a quadrature radio frequency carrier signal using a quadrature test signal; anda radio frequency to IQ down-converter configured to, during the test mode, down-convert a down-converter radio frequency input signal to provide a quadrature down-converter output signal using the quadrature radio frequency carrier signal, such that the down-converter radio frequency input signal is based on the quadrature test signal and a complex gain of a transmit path,wherein baseband facing circuitry comprises a digital frequency converter configured to, during the test mode, frequency convert the quadrature down-converter output signal to provide an averaged frequency converter output signal, which is a quadrature direct current signal that is representative of an amplitude and phase of the quadrature test signal and the complex gain of the transmit path, such that the quadrature down-converter output signal is synchronized to the quadrature test signal.
  • 20. The antenna facing circuitry of claim 19 wherein the baseband facing circuitry is configured to provide the quadrature test signal.
PRIORITY CLAIMS

The present application is a national stage application under 35 U.S.C. §371 of international patent application number PCT/US12/40317 filed May 31, 2012. International application PCT/US12/40317 claims priority to U.S. provisional patent application No. 61/491,416, filed May 31, 2011. All of the above listed applications are hereby incorporated herein by reference in their entireties.

PCT Information
Filing Document Filing Date Country Kind 371c Date
PCT/US2012/040317 5/31/2012 WO 00 11/27/2013
Publishing Document Publishing Date Country Kind
WO2012/166992 12/6/2012 WO A
US Referenced Citations (295)
Number Name Date Kind
3969682 Rossum Jul 1976 A
3980964 Grodinsky Sep 1976 A
4587552 Chin May 1986 A
4692889 McNeely Sep 1987 A
4831258 Paulk et al. May 1989 A
4996500 Larson et al. Feb 1991 A
5099203 Weaver et al. Mar 1992 A
5146504 Pinckley Sep 1992 A
5187396 Armstrong, II et al. Feb 1993 A
5311309 Ersoz et al. May 1994 A
5317217 Rieger et al. May 1994 A
5351087 Christopher et al. Sep 1994 A
5414614 Fette et al. May 1995 A
5420643 Romesburg et al. May 1995 A
5457620 Dromgoole Oct 1995 A
5486871 Filliman et al. Jan 1996 A
5532916 Tamagawa Jul 1996 A
5541547 Lam Jul 1996 A
5581454 Collins Dec 1996 A
5646621 Cabler et al. Jul 1997 A
5715526 Weaver, Jr. et al. Feb 1998 A
5767744 Irwin et al. Jun 1998 A
5822318 Tiedemann, Jr. et al. Oct 1998 A
5898342 Bell Apr 1999 A
5905407 Midya May 1999 A
5936464 Grondahl Aug 1999 A
6043610 Buell Mar 2000 A
6043707 Budnik Mar 2000 A
6055168 Kotowski et al. Apr 2000 A
6070181 Yeh May 2000 A
6118343 Winslow et al. Sep 2000 A
6133777 Savelli Oct 2000 A
6141541 Midya et al. Oct 2000 A
6147478 Skelton et al. Nov 2000 A
6166598 Schlueter Dec 2000 A
6198645 Kotowski et al. Mar 2001 B1
6204731 Jiang et al. Mar 2001 B1
6256482 Raab Jul 2001 B1
6300826 Mathe et al. Oct 2001 B1
6313681 Yoshikawa Nov 2001 B1
6348780 Grant Feb 2002 B1
6400775 Gourgue et al. Jun 2002 B1
6483281 Hwang Nov 2002 B2
6559689 Clark May 2003 B1
6566935 Renous May 2003 B1
6583610 Groom et al. Jun 2003 B2
6617930 Nitta Sep 2003 B2
6621808 Sadri Sep 2003 B1
6624712 Cygan et al. Sep 2003 B1
6658445 Gau et al. Dec 2003 B1
6681101 Eidson et al. Jan 2004 B1
6690652 Sadri Feb 2004 B1
6701141 Lam Mar 2004 B2
6703080 Reyzelman et al. Mar 2004 B2
6728163 Gomm et al. Apr 2004 B2
6744151 Jackson et al. Jun 2004 B2
6819938 Sahota Nov 2004 B2
6885176 Librizzi Apr 2005 B2
6958596 Sferrazza et al. Oct 2005 B1
6995995 Zeng et al. Feb 2006 B2
7038536 Cioffi et al. May 2006 B2
7043213 Robinson et al. May 2006 B2
7053718 Dupuis et al. May 2006 B2
7058373 Grigore Jun 2006 B2
7099635 McCune Aug 2006 B2
7164893 Leizerovich et al. Jan 2007 B2
7170341 Conrad et al. Jan 2007 B2
7200365 Watanabe et al. Apr 2007 B2
7233130 Kay Jun 2007 B1
7253589 Potanin et al. Aug 2007 B1
7254157 Crotty et al. Aug 2007 B1
7262658 Ramaswamy et al. Aug 2007 B2
7279875 Gan et al. Oct 2007 B2
7348847 Whittaker Mar 2008 B2
7394233 Trayling et al. Jul 2008 B1
7405618 Lee et al. Jul 2008 B2
7411316 Pai Aug 2008 B2
7414330 Chen Aug 2008 B2
7454238 Vinayak et al. Nov 2008 B2
7515885 Sander et al. Apr 2009 B2
7528807 Kim et al. May 2009 B2
7529523 Young et al. May 2009 B1
7539466 Tan et al. May 2009 B2
7595569 Amerom et al. Sep 2009 B2
7609114 Hsieh et al. Oct 2009 B2
7615979 Caldwell Nov 2009 B2
7627622 Conrad et al. Dec 2009 B2
7646108 Paillet et al. Jan 2010 B2
7653366 Grigore Jan 2010 B2
7679433 Li Mar 2010 B1
7684216 Choi et al. Mar 2010 B2
7696735 Oraw et al. Apr 2010 B2
7715811 Kenington May 2010 B2
7724837 Filimonov et al. May 2010 B2
7755431 Sun Jul 2010 B2
7764060 Wilson Jul 2010 B2
7773691 Khlat et al. Aug 2010 B2
7777459 Williams Aug 2010 B2
7782036 Wong et al. Aug 2010 B1
7783269 Vinayak et al. Aug 2010 B2
7800427 Chae et al. Sep 2010 B2
7805115 McMorrow et al. Sep 2010 B1
7856048 Smaini et al. Dec 2010 B1
7859336 Markowski et al. Dec 2010 B2
7880547 Lee et al. Feb 2011 B2
7894216 Melanson Feb 2011 B2
7898268 Bernardon et al. Mar 2011 B2
7898327 Nentwig Mar 2011 B2
7907010 Wendt et al. Mar 2011 B2
7915961 Li Mar 2011 B1
7920023 Witchard Apr 2011 B2
7923974 Martin et al. Apr 2011 B2
7965140 Takahashi Jun 2011 B2
7994864 Chen et al. Aug 2011 B2
8000117 Petricek Aug 2011 B2
8008970 Homol et al. Aug 2011 B1
8022761 Drogi et al. Sep 2011 B2
8026765 Giovannotto Sep 2011 B2
8044639 Tamegai et al. Oct 2011 B2
8054126 Yang et al. Nov 2011 B2
8068622 Melanson et al. Nov 2011 B2
8081199 Takata et al. Dec 2011 B2
8093951 Zhang et al. Jan 2012 B1
8159297 Kumagai Apr 2012 B2
8164388 Iwamatsu Apr 2012 B2
8174313 Vice May 2012 B2
8183917 Drogi et al. May 2012 B2
8183929 Grondahl May 2012 B2
8198941 Lesso Jun 2012 B2
8204456 Xu et al. Jun 2012 B2
8242813 Wile et al. Aug 2012 B1
8253485 Clifton Aug 2012 B2
8253487 Hou et al. Aug 2012 B2
8274332 Cho et al. Sep 2012 B2
8289084 Morimoto et al. Oct 2012 B2
8362837 Koren et al. Jan 2013 B2
8541993 Notman et al. Sep 2013 B2
8542061 Levesque et al. Sep 2013 B2
8548398 Baxter et al. Oct 2013 B2
8558616 Shizawa et al. Oct 2013 B2
8588713 Khlat Nov 2013 B2
8611402 Chiron Dec 2013 B2
8618868 Khlat et al. Dec 2013 B2
8624576 Khlat et al. Jan 2014 B2
8624760 Ngo et al. Jan 2014 B2
8626091 Khlat et al. Jan 2014 B2
8638165 Shah et al. Jan 2014 B2
8648657 Rozenblit Feb 2014 B1
8659355 Henshaw et al. Feb 2014 B2
8717100 Reisner et al. May 2014 B2
8718582 See et al. May 2014 B2
8744382 Hou et al. Jun 2014 B2
8824978 Briffa et al. Sep 2014 B2
8829993 Briffa et al. Sep 2014 B2
8909175 McCallister Dec 2014 B1
8947162 Wimpenny et al. Feb 2015 B2
8981847 Balteanu Mar 2015 B2
8994345 Wilson Mar 2015 B2
20020071497 Bengtsson et al. Jun 2002 A1
20030031271 Bozeki et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030062950 Hamada et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030137286 Kimball et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030146791 Shvarts et al. Aug 2003 A1
20030153289 Hughes et al. Aug 2003 A1
20030198063 Smyth Oct 2003 A1
20030206603 Husted Nov 2003 A1
20030220953 Allred Nov 2003 A1
20030232622 Seo et al. Dec 2003 A1
20040047329 Zheng Mar 2004 A1
20040051384 Jackson et al. Mar 2004 A1
20040124913 Midya et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040132424 Aytur et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040184569 Challa et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040196095 Nonaka Oct 2004 A1
20040219891 Hadjichristos Nov 2004 A1
20040239301 Kobayashi Dec 2004 A1
20040266366 Robinson et al. Dec 2004 A1
20040267842 Allred Dec 2004 A1
20050008093 Matsuura et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050032499 Cho Feb 2005 A1
20050047180 Kim Mar 2005 A1
20050064830 Grigore Mar 2005 A1
20050079835 Takabayashi et al. Apr 2005 A1
20050093630 Whittaker et al. May 2005 A1
20050110562 Robinson et al. May 2005 A1
20050122171 Miki et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050156582 Redl et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050156662 Raghupathy et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050157778 Trachewsky et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050200407 Arai et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050286616 Kodavati Dec 2005 A1
20060006946 Burns et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060062324 Naito et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060097711 Brandt May 2006 A1
20060128324 Tan et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060154637 Eyries et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060178119 Jarvinen Aug 2006 A1
20060181340 Dhuyvetter Aug 2006 A1
20060220627 Koh Oct 2006 A1
20060244513 Yen et al. Nov 2006 A1
20070008804 Lu et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070014382 Shakeshaft et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070024360 Markowski Feb 2007 A1
20070024365 Ramaswamy et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070063681 Liu Mar 2007 A1
20070082622 Leinonen et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070146076 Baba Jun 2007 A1
20070182392 Nishida Aug 2007 A1
20070183532 Matero Aug 2007 A1
20070184794 Drogi et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070259628 Carmel et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070290749 Woo et al. Dec 2007 A1
20080003950 Haapoja et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080044041 Tucker et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080081572 Rofougaran Apr 2008 A1
20080104432 Vinayak et al. May 2008 A1
20080150619 Lesso et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080205095 Pinon et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080242246 Minnis et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080252278 Lindeberg et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080258831 Kunihiro et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080280577 Beukema et al. Nov 2008 A1
20090004981 Eliezer et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090045872 Kenington Feb 2009 A1
20090082006 Pozsgay et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090097591 Kim Apr 2009 A1
20090160548 Ishikawa et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090167260 Pauritsch et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090174466 Hsieh et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090184764 Markowski et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090190699 Kazakevich et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090191826 Takinami et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090218995 Ahn Sep 2009 A1
20090230934 Hooijschuur et al. Sep 2009 A1
20090261908 Markowski Oct 2009 A1
20090284235 Weng et al. Nov 2009 A1
20090289720 Takinami et al. Nov 2009 A1
20090319065 Risbo Dec 2009 A1
20100001793 Van Zeijl et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100002473 Williams Jan 2010 A1
20100019749 Katsuya et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100019840 Takahashi Jan 2010 A1
20100026250 Petty Feb 2010 A1
20100045247 Blanken et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100171553 Okubo et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100253309 Xi et al. Oct 2010 A1
20100266066 Takahashi Oct 2010 A1
20100301947 Fujioka et al. Dec 2010 A1
20100308654 Chen Dec 2010 A1
20100311365 Vinayak et al. Dec 2010 A1
20100321127 Watanabe et al. Dec 2010 A1
20100327825 Mehas et al. Dec 2010 A1
20100327971 Kumagi Dec 2010 A1
20110018626 Kojima Jan 2011 A1
20110058601 Kim et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110084760 Guo et al. Apr 2011 A1
20110109387 Lee May 2011 A1
20110148375 Tsuji Jun 2011 A1
20110234182 Wilson Sep 2011 A1
20110235827 Lesso et al. Sep 2011 A1
20110260706 Nishijima Oct 2011 A1
20110279180 Yamanouchi et al. Nov 2011 A1
20110298433 Tam Dec 2011 A1
20110298539 Drogi et al. Dec 2011 A1
20120025907 Koo et al. Feb 2012 A1
20120025919 Huynh Feb 2012 A1
20120034893 Baxter et al. Feb 2012 A1
20120049953 Khlat Mar 2012 A1
20120068767 Henshaw et al. Mar 2012 A1
20120074916 Trochut Mar 2012 A1
20120133299 Capodivacca et al. May 2012 A1
20120139516 Tsai et al. Jun 2012 A1
20120154035 Hongo et al. Jun 2012 A1
20120154054 Kaczman et al. Jun 2012 A1
20120170334 Menegoli et al. Jul 2012 A1
20120176196 Khlat Jul 2012 A1
20120194274 Fowers et al. Aug 2012 A1
20120200354 Ripley et al. Aug 2012 A1
20120236444 Srivastava et al. Sep 2012 A1
20120244916 Brown et al. Sep 2012 A1
20120269240 Balteanu et al. Oct 2012 A1
20120299647 Honjo et al. Nov 2012 A1
20130024142 Folkmann et al. Jan 2013 A1
20130034139 Khlat et al. Feb 2013 A1
20130094553 Paek et al. Apr 2013 A1
20130135043 Hietala et al. May 2013 A1
20130169245 Kay et al. Jul 2013 A1
20130214858 Tournatory et al. Aug 2013 A1
20130229235 Ohnishi Sep 2013 A1
20130307617 Khlat et al. Nov 2013 A1
20130328613 Kay et al. Dec 2013 A1
20140009200 Kay et al. Jan 2014 A1
20140009227 Kay et al. Jan 2014 A1
20140028370 Wimpenny Jan 2014 A1
20140028392 Wimpenny Jan 2014 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (35)
Number Date Country
1211355 Mar 1999 CN
1518209 Aug 2004 CN
1898860 Jan 2007 CN
101201891 Jun 2008 CN
101379695 Mar 2009 CN
101416385 Apr 2009 CN
101427459 May 2009 CN
101626355 Jan 2010 CN
101635697 Jan 2010 CN
101867284 Oct 2010 CN
0755121 Jan 1997 EP
1317105 Jun 2003 EP
1492227 Dec 2004 EP
1557955 Jul 2005 EP
1569330 Aug 2005 EP
2214304 Aug 2010 EP
2244366 Oct 2010 EP
2372904 Oct 2011 EP
2579456 Apr 2013 EP
2398648 Aug 2004 GB
2462204 Feb 2010 GB
2465552 May 2010 GB
2484475 Apr 2012 GB
461168 Oct 2001 TW
0048306 Aug 2000 WO
2004002006 Dec 2003 WO
2004082135 Sep 2004 WO
2005013084 Feb 2005 WO
2006021774 Mar 2006 WO
2006070319 Jul 2006 WO
2006073208 Jul 2006 WO
2007107919 Sep 2007 WO
2007149346 Dec 2007 WO
2012151594 Nov 2012 WO
2012172544 Dec 2012 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (189)
Entry
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/661,552, mailed Jun. 13, 2014, 5 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2012/062110, issued Apr. 8, 2014, 12 pages.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT/US2012/062110, mailed May 8, 2014, 9 pages.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/692,084, mailed Apr. 10, 2014, 6 pages.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/692,084, mailed Jul. 23, 2014, 7 pages.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/690,187, mailed Sep. 3, 2014, 9 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2012/067230, mailed Feb. 21, 2013, 10 pages.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability and Written Opinion for PCT/US2012/067230, mailed Jun. 12, 2014, 7 pages.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/684,826, mailed Apr. 3, 2014, 5 pages.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/684,826, mailed Jul. 18, 2014, 7 pages.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/022,940, mailed Dec. 20, 2013, 5 pages.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 14/022,940, mailed Jun. 10, 2014, 7 pages.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/714,600, mailed May 9, 2014, 14 pages.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/782,142, mailed Sep. 4, 2014, 6 pages.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/951,976, mailed Apr. 4, 2014, 7 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2013/052277, mailed Jan. 7, 2014, 14 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2013/065403, mailed Feb. 5, 2014, 11 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2014/028089, mailed Jul. 17, 2014, 10 pages.
Invitation to Pay Additional Fees and Partial International Search Report for PCT/US2014/028178, mailed Jul. 24, 2014, 7 pages.
Choi, J. et al., “A New Power Management IC Architecture for Envelope Tracking Power Amplifier,” IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, vol. 59, No. 7, Jul. 2011, pp. 1796-1802.
Cidronali, A. et al., “A 240W dual-band 870 and 2140 MHz envelope tracking GaN PA designed by a probability distribution conscious approach,” IEEE MTT-S International Microwave Symposium Digest, Jun. 5-10, 2011, 4 pages.
Dixon, N., “Standardisation Boosts Momentum for Envelope Tracking,” Microwave Engineering, Europe, Apr. 20, 2011, 2 pages, http://www.mwee.com/en/standardisation-boosts-momentum-for-envelope-tracking.html?cmp—ids=71&news—ids=222901746.
Hassan, Muhammad, et al., “A Combined Series-Parallel Hybrid Envelope Amplifier for Envelope Tracking Mobile Terminal RF Power Amplifier Applications,” IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, vol. 47, No. 5, May 2012, pp. 1185-1198.
Hekkala, A. et al., “Adaptive Time Misalignment Compensation in Envelope Tracking Amplifiers,” 2008 IEEE International Symposium on Spread Spectrum Techniques and Applications, Aug. 2008, pp. 761-765.
Hoversten, John, et al., “Codesign of PA, Supply, and Signal Processing for Linear Supply-Modulated RF Transmitters,” IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, vol. 60, No. 6, Jun. 2012, pp. 2010-2020.
Kim et al., “High Efficiency and Wideband Envelope Tracking Power Amplifiers with Sweet Spot Tracking,” 2010 IEEE Radio Frequency Integrated Circuits Symposium, May 23-25, 2010, pp. 255-258.
Kim, N. et al, “Ripple Feedback Filter Suitable for Analog/Digital Mixed-Mode Audio Amplifier for Improved Efficiency and Stability,” 2002 IEEE Power Electronics Specialists Conference, vol. 1, Jun. 23, 2002, pp. 45-49.
Knutson, P, et al., “An Optimal Approach to Digital Raster Mapper Design,” 1991 IEEE International Conference on Consumer Electronics held Jun. 5-7, 1991, vol. 37, Issue 4, published Nov. 1991, pp. 746-752.
Le, Hanh-Phuc et al., “A 32nm Fully Integrated Reconfigurable Switched-Capacitor DC-DC Convertor Delivering 0.55W/mm^2 at 81% Efficiency,” 2010 IEEE International Solid State Circuits Conference, Feb. 7-11, 2010, pp. 210-212.
Li, Y. et al., “A Highly Efficient SiGe Differential Power Amplifier Using an Envelope-Tracking Technique for 3GPP LTE Applications,” 2010 IEEE Bipolar/BiCMOS Circuits and Technology Meeting (BCTM), Oct. 4-6, 2010, pp. 121-124.
Lie, Donald Y.C. et al., “Design of Highly-Efficient Wideband RF Polar Transmitters Using Envelope-Tracking (ET) for Mobile WiMAX/Wibro Applications,” IEEE 8th International Conference on ASIC (ASCION), Oct. 20-23, 2009, pp. 347-350.
Lie, Donald Y.C. et al., “Highly Efficient and Linear SiGe Power Amplifier Design,” 8th International Conference on Solid-State and Integrated Circuit Technology (ICSICT), Oct. 23-26, 2006, pp. 1526-1529.
Sahu, B. et al., “Adaptive Power Management of Linear RF Power Amplifiers in Mobile Handsets—An Integrated System Design Approach,” submission for IEEE Asia Pacific Microwave Conference, Mar. 2004, 4 pages.
Unknown Author, “Nujira Files 100th Envelope Tracking Patent,” CS: Compound Semiconductor, Apr. 11, 2011, 1 page, http://www.compoundsemiconductor.net/csc/news-details.php?cat=news&id=19733338&key=Nujira%20Files%20100th%20Envelope%20Tracking%20Patent&type=n.
Wu, Patrick Y. et al., “A Two-Phase Switching Hybrid Supply Modulator for RF Power Amplifiers with 9% Efficiency Improvement,” IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, vol. 45, No. 12, Dec. 2010, pp. 2543-2556.
Yousefzadeh, Vahid et al., “Band Separation and Efficiency Optimization in Linear-Assisted Switching Power Amplifiers,” 37th IEEE Power Electronics Specialists Conference, Jun. 18-22, 2006, pp. 1-7.
Non-final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/113,873, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,773,691, mailed Feb. 1, 2008, 17 pages.
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/113,873, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,773,691, mailed Jul. 30, 2008, 19 pages.
Non-final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/113,873, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,773,691, mailed Nov. 26, 2008, 22 pages.
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/113,873, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,773,691, mailed May 4, 2009, 20 pages.
Non-final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/113,873, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,773,691, mailed Feb. 3, 2010, 21 pages.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 11/113,873, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,773,691, mailed Jun. 9, 2010, 7 pages.
International Search Report for PCT/US06/12619, mailed May 8, 2007, 2 pages.
Extended European Search Report for application 06740532.4, mailed Dec. 7, 2010, 7 pages.
Non-final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/112,006, mailed Apr. 5, 2010, 6 pages.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 12/112,006, mailed Jul. 19, 2010, 6 pages.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/836,307, mailed Nov. 5, 2013, 6 pages.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 12/836,307, mailed May 5, 2014, 6 pages.
Non-final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/089,917, mailed Nov. 23, 2012, 6 pages.
Examination Report for European Patent Application No. 11720630, mailed Aug. 16, 2013, 5 pages.
Examination Report for European Patent Application No. 11720630.0, issued Mar. 18, 2014, 4 pages.
European Search Report for European Patent Application No. 14162682.0, issued Aug. 27, 2014, 7 pages.
International Search Report for PCT/US11/033037, mailed Aug. 9, 2011, 10 pages.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT/US2011/033037, mailed Nov. 1, 2012, 7 pages.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/188,024, mailed Feb. 5, 2013, 8 pages.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/188,024, mailed Jun. 18, 2013, 8 pages.
International Search Report for PCT/US2011/044857, mailed Oct. 24, 2011, 10 pages.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT/US2011/044857, mailed Mar. 7, 2013, 6 pages.
Non-final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/218,400, mailed Nov. 8, 2012, 7 pages.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/218,400, mailed Apr. 11, 2013, 7 pages.
International Search Report for PCT/US11/49243, mailed Dec. 22, 2011, 9 pages.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT/US11/49243, mailed Nov. 13, 2012, 33 pages.
International Search Report for PCT/US2011/054106, mailed Feb. 9, 2012, 11 pages.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT/US2011/054106, mailed Apr. 11, 2013, 8 pages.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/297,490, mailed Feb. 27, 2014, 7 pages.
Invitation to Pay Additional Fees for PCT/US2011/061007, mailed Feb. 13, 2012, 7 pages.
International Search Report for PCT/US2011/061007, mailed Aug. 16, 2012, 16 pages.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT/US2011/061007, mailed May 30, 2013, 11 pages.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/297,470, mailed May 8, 2013, 15 pages.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 14/072,140, mailed Dec. 2, 2014, 8 pages.
First Office Action for Chinese Patent Application No. 201280026559.0 issued Nov. 3, 2014, 14 pages (with English translation).
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/486,012, mailed Nov. 21, 2014, 8 pages.
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/689,883, mailed Jan. 2, 2015, 13 pages.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/690,187, mailed Dec. 19, 2014, 8 pages.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/747,694, mailed Dec. 22, 2014, 9 pages.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/951,976, mailed Dec. 26, 2014, 9 pages.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/747,749, mailed Nov. 12, 2014, 32 pages.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/836,307, mailed Sep. 25, 2014, 5 pages.
Advisory Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/297,470, mailed Sep. 19, 2014, 3 pages.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/297,470, mailed Oct. 20, 2014, 22 pages.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/367,973, mailed Sep. 15, 2014, 7 pages.
Extended European Search Report for European Patent Application No. 12794149.0, issued Oct. 29, 2014, 6 pages.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/647,815, mailed Sep. 19, 2014, 6 pages.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/661,227, mailed Sep. 29, 2014, 24 pages.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/684,826, mailed Sep. 8, 2014, 6 pages.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/714,600, mailed Oct. 15, 2014, 13 pages.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/914,888, mailed Oct. 17, 2014, 10 pages.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/747,725, mailed Oct. 7, 2014, 6 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2014/012927, mailed Sep. 30, 2014, 11 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2014/028178, mailed Sep. 30, 2014, 17 pages.
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/297,470, mailed Oct. 25, 2013, 17 pages.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/297,470, mailed Feb. 20, 2014, 16 pages.
International Search Report for PCT/US2011/061009, mailed Feb. 8, 2012, 14 pages.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT/US2011/061009, mailed May 30, 2013, 10 pages.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 14/022,858, mailed Oct. 25, 2013, 9 pages.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 14/022,858, mailed May 27, 2014, 6 pages.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/343,840, mailed Jul. 1, 2013, 8 pages.
International Search Report for PCT/US2012/023495, mailed May 7, 2012, 13 pages.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT/US2012/023495, mailed Aug. 15, 2013, 10 pages.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/363,888, mailed Jul. 18, 2013, 9 pages.
Non-final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/222,453, mailed Dec. 6, 2012, 13 pages.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/222,453, mailed Feb. 21, 2013, 7 pages.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/222,453, mailed Aug. 22, 2013, 8 pages.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/367,973, mailed Sep. 24, 2013, 8 pages.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/367,973, mailed Apr. 25, 2014, 5 pages.
Invitation to Pay Additional Fees and Where Applicable Protest Fee for PCT/US2012/024124, mailed Jun. 1, 2012, 7 pages.
International Search Report for PCT/US2012/024124, mailed Aug. 24, 2012, 14 pages.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT/US2012/024124, mailed Aug. 22, 2013, 8 pages.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/423,649, mailed May 22, 2013, 7 pages.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/423,649, mailed Aug. 30, 2013, 8 pages.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 14/072,140, mailed Aug. 27, 2014, 8 pages.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/316,229, mailed Nov. 14, 2012, 9 pages.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/316,229, mailed Aug. 29, 2013, 8 pages.
International Search Report for PCT/US2011/064255, mailed Apr. 3, 2012, 12 pages.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT/US2011/064255, mailed Jun. 20, 2013, 7 pages.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/072,225, mailed Aug. 15, 2014, 4 pages.
International Search Report for PCT/US2012/40317, mailed Sep. 7, 2012, 7 pages.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT/US2012/040317, mailed Dec. 12, 2013, 5 pages.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/486,012, mailed Jul. 28, 2014, 7 pages.
Quayle Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/531,719, mailed Oct. 10, 2013, 5 pages.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/531,719, mailed Dec. 30, 2013, 7 pages.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/548,283, mailed Sep. 3, 2014, 7 pages.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/550,049, mailed Nov. 25, 2013, 6 pages.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/550,049, mailed Mar. 6, 2014, 5 pages.
International Search Report for PCT/US2012/046887, mailed Dec. 21, 2012, 12 pages.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT/US2012/046887, mailed Jan. 30, 2014, 8 pages.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/550,060, mailed Aug. 16, 2013, 8 pages.
Non-final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/222,484, mailed Nov. 8, 2012, 9 pages.
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/222,484, mailed Apr. 10, 2013, 10 pages.
Advisory Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/222,484, mailed Jun. 14, 2013, 3 pages.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/222,484, mailed Aug. 26, 2013, 8 pages.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/602,856, mailed Sep. 24, 2013, 9 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2012/053654, mailed Feb. 15, 2013, 11 pages.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT/US2012/053654, mailed Mar. 13, 2014, 7 pages.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/647,815, mailed May 2, 2014, 6 pages.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/689,883, mailed Mar. 27, 2014, 13 pages.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/689,883, mailed Aug. 27, 2014, 12 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2012/062070, mailed Jan. 21, 2013, 12 pages.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT/US2012/062070, mailed May 8, 2014, 8 pages.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/661,552, mailed Feb. 21, 2014, 5 pages.
European Search Report for European Patent Application No. 14190851.7, issued Mar. 5, 2015, 6 pages.
First Office Action for Chinese Patent Application No. 201180030273.5, issued Dec. 3, 2014, 15 pages. (with English translation).
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT/US2013/052277, mailed Feb. 5, 2015, 9 pages.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 12/836,307, mailed Mar. 2, 2015, 6 pages.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/297,470, mailed Feb. 25, 2015, 15 pages.
Corrected Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/297,470, mailed Apr. 6, 2015, 11 pages.
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/714,600, mailed Mar. 10, 2015, 14 pages.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/056,292, mailed Mar. 6, 2015, 8 pages.
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/747,749, mailed Mar. 20, 2015, 35 pages.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/072,120, mailed Apr. 14, 2015, 8 pages.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/948,291, mailed Feb. 11, 2015, 7 pages.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 14/022,858, mailed Feb. 17, 2015, 7 pages.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 14/072,225, mailed Jan. 22, 2015, 7 pages.
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/661,227, mailed Feb. 6, 2015, 24 pages.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/048,109, mailed Feb. 18, 2015, 8 pages.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/747,725, mailed Feb. 2, 2015, 10 pages.
European Examination Report for European Patent Application No. 14162682.0, mailed May 22, 2015, 5 pages.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT/US2013/065403, mailed Apr. 30, 2015, 8 pages.
First Office Action and Search Report for Chinese Patent Application No. 201280007941.7, issued May 13, 2015, 13 pages.
Yun, Hu et al., “Study of envelope tracking power amplifier design,” Journal of Circuits and Systems, vol. 15, No. 6, Dec. 2010, pp. 6-10.
Corrected Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/297,470, mailed Jun. 5, 2015, 11 pages.
Advisory Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/689,883, mailed Apr. 20, 2015, 3 pages.
Advisory Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/661,227, mailed May 12, 2015, 3 pages.
Advisory Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/714,600, mailed May 26, 2015, 3 pages.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/747,725, mailed May 13, 2015, 9 pages.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/747,749, mailed Jun. 4, 2015, 8 pages.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/552,768, mailed Apr. 20, 2015, 12 pages.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/689,922, mailed Apr. 20, 2015, 19 pages.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/727,911, mailed Apr. 20, 2015, 10 pages.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/163,229, mailed Apr. 23, 2015, 9 pages.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/163,256, mailed Apr. 23, 2015, 9 pages.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 14/176,611, mailed Apr. 27, 2015, 7 pages.
Quayle Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/689,940, mailed May 14, 2015, 7 pages.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/661,164, mailed Jun. 3, 2015, 6 pages.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/082,629, mailed Jun. 18, 2015, 15 pages.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/948,291, mailed Jul. 17, 2015, 8 pages.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/689,883, mailed Jul. 24, 2015, 13 pages.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/661,227, mailed Jul. 27, 2015, 25 pages.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/714,600, mailed Jul. 17, 2015, 14 pages.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 14/212,154, mailed Jul. 17, 2015, 8 pages.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 14/212,199, mailed Jul. 20, 2015, 8 pages.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 14/072,120, mailed Jul. 30, 2015, 7 pages.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/689,940, mailed Aug. 3, 2015, 6 pages.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 14/072,140, mailed Aug. 20, 2015, 6 pages.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/072,225, mailed Aug. 18, 2015, 4 pages.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/747,725, mailed Sep. 1, 2015, 9 pages.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 14/027,416, mailed Aug. 11, 2015, 9 pages.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT/US2014/012927, mailed Aug. 6, 2015, 9 pages.
First Office Action and Search Report for Chinese Patent Application No. 201210596632.X, mailed Jun. 25, 2015, 16 pages.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20140099907 A1 Apr 2014 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
61491416 May 2011 US