This description relates to operation of data collection systems in particular security systems.
Wireless sensor device data collection systems with remote server-based monitoring and report generation are becoming more common in applications such as home safety monitoring, electrical and water utility meter monitoring and human and asset tracking. For example, it is common for businesses and homeowners to have a security system for detecting alarm conditions at their premises and signaling the conditions to a monitoring station or to authorized users of the security system.
Many devices such as those involved in sensor networks use a rules engine as a subcomponent for processing rules that control and monitor processes executing on devices. The execution of rules may produce no output as when monitoring devices update internal values and processes or execution of rules may be an indication that a rule has fired (executed). As a subcomponent, rules and data updates are sent to the rules engine and rules either fire or do not fire. In a typical system, another component evaluates the output of the rules engine and determines an action to take such as where results should be sent or if additional processes are needed or if the rule is chained to other rules or in a general sense how to route the outputs from firing of the rules. In complex control systems, muting decisions and actions to and from a rules engine can be a major portion of the effort involved in writing code to accomplish transfers of the results.
Data inputs and rules updates to a rules engine typically come from a single source that controls the rules engine and interfaces with the rest of the system. These typical implementations require significant additional software and configuration to properly perform and to route rules, data and actions. Depending upon the complexity of the system, it can be very difficult to manage and maintain the proper configurations for such a system.
Enhancing complex rules with additional functions is problematic due to execution time and stability of the additional functions interfering with the timely execution of the rules engine. In complex control systems, routing decisions and actions from execution of rules by a rules engine can be a major portion of the effort.
According to an aspect, a system for managing of a rules engine is disclosed. The system includes a computing device implementing a rules engine and a router to interact with the rules engine and rule engine results, the router configured to feed inputs to and receive outputs from the rules engine and the router further configured to programmatically route results of rule execution by the rules engine to a hierarchical structure stored in computer storage for access by subscriber devices.
The following are some embodiments within this aspect.
The rules engine operates with a defined rules format that supports routing information within the rule itself. The rules engine operates with a defined rules format that supports routing information that is associated with the rule. The router supports a publish/subscribe connectivity protocol. The router supports a MQTT connectivity protocol. When a rule executes the rules engine automatically publishes the output of the rule to a specific publish topic in the hierarchical structure. Other processes subscribe to access the hierarchical structure to receive and process outputs of rules that fired. The hierarchical structure is arranged as sets of topics with a superset of topics being topics that are higher in the hierarchy than the topic subscribed to. The processes/devices are sensor processes and sensor devices.
Other aspects include methods for managing a network of sensor devices and computer program products for managing a network of sensor devices.
Aspects may include one or more of the following advantages.
Implementations may eliminate the need for an external interface to the rules engine to determine and perform routing functions. When a rule fires, if the rule includes a publish topic, the output of the rule is automatically published to a specific publish topic (routing destination) contained in the rule. All other processes that require results of the output of that rule, e.g., “interested processes” subscribe to the topic or supersets of that topic and receive and process the output of the rule. This allows publisher devices/processes to directly send variable updates without needing to separately specify a path to the data location within the rules engine. No synchronization of configuration data is needed to maintain the routing. Thus, multiple processes can perform completely different functions on the same rule result by all just subscribing to the same topic. Rule outputs can be automatically rerouted to the rules engine to perform chaining of results. Complex additional functional routines can assist rules without slowing down the rules engine and without risking stopping rules engine execution. This is done through loosely connect/coupled publish/subscribe connections.
The details of one or more embodiments of the invention are set forth in the accompanying drawings and the description below. Other features, objects, and advantages of the invention is apparent from the description and drawings, and from the claims.
Described are examples of network features that may be used in various contexts including, but not limited to, security/intrusion and alarm systems. Example security systems may include an intrusion detection panel that is electrically or wirelessly connected to a variety of sensors. Those sensor types may include motion detectors, cameras, and proximity sensors (used, e.g., to determine whether a door or window has been opened). Typically, such systems receive a relatively simple signal (electrically open or closed) from one or more of these sensors to indicate that a particular condition being monitored has changed or become unsecure.
For example, typical intrusion systems can be set-up to monitor entry doors in a building. When a door is secured, a proximity sensor senses a magnetic contact and produces an electrically closed circuit. When the door is opened, the proximity sensor opens the circuit, and sends a signal to the panel indicating that an alarm condition has occurred (e.g., an opened entry door).
Data collection systems are becoming more common in some applications, such as home safety monitoring. Data collection systems employ wireless sensor networks and wireless devices, and may include remote server-based monitoring and report generation. As described in more detail below, wireless sensor networks generally use a combination of wired and wireless links between computing devices, with wireless links usually used for the lowest level connections (e.g., end-node device to hub/gateway). In an example network, the edge (wirelessly-connected) tier of the network is comprised of resource-constrained devices with specific functions. These devices may have a small-to-moderate amount of processing power and memory, and may be battery powered, thus requiring that they conserve energy by spending much of their time in sleep mode. A typical model is one where the edge devices generally form a single wireless network in which each end-node communicates directly with its parent node in a hub-and-spoke-style architecture. The parent node may be, e.g., an access point on a gateway or a sub-coordinator which is, in turn, connected to the access point or another sub-coordinator.
Referring now to
The distributed network 10 includes a second logically divided tier or hierarchical level 12b, referred to here as a middle tier that involves gateways 16 located at central, convenient places inside individual buildings and structures. These gateways 16 communicate with servers 14 in the upper tier whether the servers are stand-alone dedicated servers and/or cloud based servers running cloud applications using web programming techniques. The middle tier gateways 16 are also shown with both local area network 17a (e.g., Ethernet or 802.11) and cellular network interfaces 17b.
The distributed network topology also includes a lower tier (edge layer) 12c set of devices that involve fully-functional sensor nodes 18 (e.g., sensor nodes that include wireless devices, e.g., transceivers or at least transmitters, which in
Referring now to
The device 41 includes in addition to the rules engine 42 and message routing various subsystems such as a routing controller 46 that operates using a suitable machine-to-machine connectivity protocol such as the “MQTT” (MQ Telemetry Transport) where MQTT is a machine-to-machine (M2M)/“Internet of Things” connectivity protocol. (See mqtt) also referred to as Message Query Telemetry Transport. The device 41 also includes interfaces 48, 50, 52 here an RF (radio frequency) mesh physical layer interface 48, a serial physical layer interface 50, and an IP (Internet Protocol interface) 52. Agents 54a-54c are able to interact with the rules engine 42 and results provided by the rules engine 42. The agents 54a-54c are instances of independent software agents or rule implementation modules (independently running functions that check input conditions and react accordingly) that run on devices, such as gateways. In device 41, the rules engine 42 and the various subsystems such as the interfaces 48, 50, 52 and agents 54a-54c interface with the routing system through the routing controller 46, as shown.
The arrangement 40 provides on device 41 a routing system 44 that interfaces with the input and output of rules engine 42. The arrangement 40 defines a rules format that supports routing information within the rule itself or in association with the rule. When a rule fires, the arrangement 40 knows programmatically where to automatically route the results.
The device 41 has the MQTT broker serving as the routing controller, and the RF mesh physical layer interface 48 and a serial physical layer interface 50 and IP interface 52 are used to send and receive messages, rules, data, etc. to/from other components in the arrangement 40. The rules engine 42 also includes storage 42a for rules and rule parameters, etc. and a rules engine MQTT interface 42b. The rules engine 42 thus includes the various rules and rule parameters needed for the engine 42, which are stored on a computer readable hardware storage device.
Referring now to
The routing system in front of the rules engine programmatically builds 66 the full variable name from the routing path so this is not needed in the payload portion of the routed message. An example of this routing method automatically producing a complex variable name is set out below:
Sent from a device:
Converted to rules variable format that includes the hierarchical structure and sent to the rules engine:
Referring now to
Publisher devices/processes do not know or need to know of any listeners (actual destinations that will consume results of rule execution). Publisher devices, such as the rules engine 42 need only publish results 72 to a topic. Other devices, referred to as listeners, i.e., subscribers, decide 74 which topics and hierarchies to subscribe to. None or one or more subscriber devices/processes choose to listen to a particular published topic and retrieve associated data that is published to that topic. Listeners (subscribers) receive, that is consume 76 information from the topics and hierarchies that the listeners had subscribe to.
None or one or more subscriber devices/processes choose to listen to a particular published topic and receive associated data. Thus, multiple subscriber devices/processes do not interfere with each other and rather consume subscribed to information at different rates. The arrangement 40 combines a rules engine, e.g., rules engine 42, with a publish/subscribe (or other) type of message routing system controller 46. Rules are written including, the rule executable, necessary parameters, a publish topic, and payload of variables.
Referring now to
This arrangement eliminates the need for an external interface to the rules engine to determine and perform routing functions. No synchronization of configuration data is needed to maintain the routing. Thus, multiple processes can perform completely different functions on the same rule result by all just subscribing to the same topic. Rule outputs can be automatically rerouted to the rules engine to perform chaining of results. Complex additional functional routines can assist rules without slowing down the rules engine and without risking stopping rules engine execution. This is done through loosely connect/coupled publish/subscribe connections.
Receivers of the rules output can obtain an atomic message that includes all of the variable settings involved in the rule. This allows receivers to know the exact state of all parameters at the moment that rule “fired.” This state can be analyzed to determine why the rule fired and for optimization of subsequent firing/use of the rule. In general, inputs to rules engines are data sent from a single interface routine that manages the flow of data and the responses. Any device or process that wants to send data to the rules engine publishes results to defined topics and the rules engine will receive and process them.
The rules engine may be implemented using any appropriate type of computing device, such as a mainframe work station, a personal computer, a server, a portable computing device, or any other type of intelligent device capable of executing instructions, connecting to a network, and forwarding data packets through the network. The engines can execute any appropriate computer programs to generate, receive, and transmit data packets for use on the network.
Each of processes discussed above may be stored on one or more non-transitory machine-readable media, such as computer memory persistent or non-persistent to store executable instructions. Each of these devices may also include one or more processing devices (e.g., microprocessors, programmable logic, application-specific integrated circuits, and so forth) for executing the instructions to perform all or part of the functions described herein.
Elements of different implementations described herein may be combined to form other embodiments not specifically set forth above. Elements may be left out of the structures described herein without adversely affecting their operation. Furthermore, various separate elements may be combined into one or more individual elements to perform the functions described herein.
The sensors provide in addition to an indication that something is detected in an area within the range of the sensors, detailed additional information that can be used to evaluate what that indication may be without the intrusion detection panel being required to perform extensive analysis of inputs to the particular sensor.
For example, a motion detector could be configured to analyze the heat signature of a warm body moving in a room to determine if the body is that of a human or a pet. Results of that analysis would be a message or data that conveys information about the body detected. Various sensors thus are used to sense sound, motion, vibration, pressure, heat, images, and so forth, in an appropriate combination to detect a true or verified alarm condition at the intrusion detection panel.
Recognition software can be used to discriminate between objects that are a human and objects that are an animal; further facial recognition software can be built into video cameras and used to verify that the perimeter intrusion was the result of a recognized, authorized individual. Such video cameras would comprise a processor and memory and the recognition software to process inputs (captured images) by the camera and produce the metadata to convey information regarding recognition or lack of recognition of an individual captured by the video camera. The processing could also alternatively or in addition include information regarding characteristic of the individual in the area captured/monitored by the video camera. Thus, depending on the circumstances, the information would be either metadata received from enhanced motion detectors and video cameras that performed enhanced analysis on inputs to the sensor that gives characteristics of the perimeter intrusion or a metadata resulting from very complex processing that seeks to establish recognition of the object.
Sensor devices can integrate multiple sensors to generate more complex outputs so that the intrusion detection panel can utilize its processing capabilities to execute algorithms that analyze the environment by building virtual images or signatures of the environment to make an intelligent decision about the validity of a breach.
Memory stores program instructions and data used by the processor of the intrusion detection panel. The memory may be a suitable combination of random access memory and read-only memory, and may host suitable program instructions (e.g. firmware or operating software), and configuration and operating data and may be organized as a file system or otherwise. The stored program instruction may include one or more authentication processes for authenticating one or more users. The program instructions stored in the memory of the panel may further store software components allowing network communications and establishment of connections to the data network. The software components may, for example, include an internet protocol (IP) stack, as well as driver components for the various interfaces, including the interfaces and the keypad. Other software components suitable for establishing a connection and communicating across network will be apparent to those of ordinary skill.
Program instructions stored in the memory, along with configuration data may control overall operation of the panel.
The monitoring server includes one or more processing devices (e.g., microprocessors), a network interface and a memory (all not illustrated). The monitoring server may physically take the form of a rack mounted card and may be in communication with one or more operator terminals (not shown). An example monitoring server is a SURGARD™ SG-System III Virtual, or similar system.
The processor of each monitoring server acts as a controller for each monitoring server, and is in communication with, and controls overall operation, of each server. The processor may include, or be in communication with, the memory that stores processor executable instructions controlling the overall operation of the monitoring server. Suitable software enable each monitoring server to receive alarms and cause appropriate actions to occur. Software may include a suitable Internet protocol (IP) stack and applications/clients.
Each monitoring server of the central monitoring station may be associated with an IP address and port(s) by which it communicates with the control panels and/or the user devices to handle alarm events, etc. The monitoring server address may be static, and thus always identify a particular one of monitoring server to the intrusion detection panels. Alternatively, dynamic addresses could be used, and associated with static domain names, resolved through a domain name service.
The network interface card interfaces with the network to receive incoming signals, and may for example take the form of an Ethernet network interface card (NIC). The servers may be computers, thin-clients, or the like, to which received data representative of an alarm event is passed for handling by human operators. The monitoring station may further include, or have access to, a subscriber database that includes a database under control of a database engine. The database may contain entries corresponding to the various subscriber devices/processes to panels like the panel that are serviced by the monitoring station.
All or part of the processes described herein and their various modifications (hereinafter referred to as “the processes”) can be implemented, at least in part, via a computer program product, i.e., a computer program tangibly embodied in one or more tangible, physical hardware storage devices that are computer and/or machine-readable storage devices for execution by, or to control the operation of, data processing apparatus, e.g., a programmable processor, a computer, or multiple computers. A computer program can be written in any form of programming language, including compiled or interpreted languages, and it can be deployed in any form, including as a stand-alone program or as a module, component, subroutine, or other unit suitable for use in a computing environment. A computer program can be deployed to be executed on one computer or on multiple computers at one site or distributed across multiple sites and interconnected by a network.
Actions associated with implementing the processes can be performed by one or more programmable processors executing one or more computer programs to perform the functions of the calibration process. All or part of the processes can be implemented as, special purpose logic circuitry, e.g., an FPGA (field programmable gate array) and/or an ASIC (application-specific integrated circuit).
Processors suitable for the execution of a computer program include, by way of example, both general and special purpose microprocessors, and any one or more processors of any kind of digital computer. Generally, a processor will receive instructions and data from a read-only storage area or a random access storage area or both. Elements of a computer (including a server) include one or more processors for executing instructions and one or more storage area devices for storing instructions and data. Generally, a computer will also include, or be operatively coupled to receive data from, or transfer data to, or both, one or more machine-readable storage media, such as mass storage devices for storing data, e.g., magnetic, magneto-optical disks, or optical disks.
Tangible, physical hardware storage devices that are suitable for embodying computer program instructions and data include all forms of non-volatile storage, including by way of example, semiconductor storage area devices, e.g., EPROM, EEPROM, and flash storage area devices; magnetic disks, e.g., internal hard disks or removable disks; magneto-optical disks; and CD-ROM and DVD-ROM disks and volatile computer memory, e.g., RAM such as static and dynamic RAM, as well as erasable memory, e.g., flash memory.
In addition, the logic flows depicted in the figures do not require the particular order shown, or sequential order, to achieve desirable results. In addition, other actions may be provided, or actions may be eliminated, from the described flows, and other components may be added to, or removed from, the described systems. Likewise, actions depicted in the figures may be performed by different entities or consolidated.
Elements of different embodiments described herein may be combined to form other embodiments not specifically set forth above. Elements may be left out of the processes, computer programs, Web pages, etc. described herein without adversely affecting their operation. Furthermore, various separate elements may be combined into one or more individual elements to perform the functions described herein.
Other implementations not specifically described herein are also within the scope of the following claims.
This application claims priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119(e) to provisional U.S. Patent Application 61/973,962, filed on Apr. 2, 2014, entitled: “Wireless Sensor Network”, and provisional U.S. Patent Application 61/946,054, filed on Feb. 28, 2014, entitled: “Wireless Sensor Network”, the entire contents of which are hereby incorporated by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5414812 | Filip et al. | May 1995 | A |
5727055 | Ivie et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
6012150 | Bartfai et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6208247 | Agre et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6272621 | Key et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6313549 | Moisan et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6531963 | Nyfelt | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6636900 | Abdelnur | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6873260 | Lancos et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6888459 | Stilp | May 2005 | B2 |
6952574 | Tealdi et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6970183 | Monroe | Nov 2005 | B1 |
7005971 | Stewart et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7295106 | Jackson et al. | Nov 2007 | B1 |
7327251 | Corbett, Jr. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7474330 | Wren et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7535687 | Costa | May 2009 | B2 |
7688808 | Ren et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7756828 | Baron et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7855635 | Cohn et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7907753 | Wilson et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7920843 | Martin et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7966660 | Yermal et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
8089910 | Doh et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8164443 | Alston et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8260893 | Bandhole et al. | Sep 2012 | B1 |
8305196 | Kennedy et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8331544 | Kraus et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8350700 | Fast et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8395494 | Trundle et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8400268 | Malik et al. | Mar 2013 | B1 |
8467763 | Martin et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8477687 | Iwasa | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8487762 | McMullen et al. | Jul 2013 | B1 |
8525665 | Trundle et al. | Sep 2013 | B1 |
8572290 | Mukhopadhyay et al. | Oct 2013 | B1 |
8572600 | Chung et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8572677 | Bartholomay et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8582431 | Johansen | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8587670 | Wood et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8611323 | Berger et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8630820 | Amis | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8634788 | Wright et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8643719 | Vian et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8644165 | Saarimaki et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8659417 | Trundle et al. | Feb 2014 | B1 |
8667571 | Raleigh | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8675920 | Hanson et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8676930 | Foisy | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8696430 | Wells | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8700747 | Spitaels et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8700749 | Elliott et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8707431 | Stephens et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8731689 | Platner et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
8732255 | Odio et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
8732292 | Tokunaga et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
8737957 | Raleigh | May 2014 | B2 |
8848721 | Turunen et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8989053 | Skaaksrud et al. | Mar 2015 | B1 |
9277352 | Ward | Mar 2016 | B1 |
10282852 | Buibas et al. | May 2019 | B1 |
20020067259 | Fufidio et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020121979 | Smith | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20030097464 | Martinez et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030097586 | Mok | May 2003 | A1 |
20030216144 | Roese et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040017929 | Bramblet et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040027243 | Carrender | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040090329 | Hitt | May 2004 | A1 |
20040103165 | Nixon | May 2004 | A1 |
20040109059 | Kawakita | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040135694 | Nyfelt | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040153671 | Schuyler et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20050052281 | Bann | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050143133 | Bridgelall | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20060022816 | Yukawa | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060035205 | Dobson et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060039356 | Rao et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060047666 | Bedi | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060059557 | Markham et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060143439 | Arumugam et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060240818 | McCoy et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060282886 | Gaug | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070028119 | Mirho | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070073861 | Amanuddin et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070093975 | Hoogenboom | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070106775 | Wong | May 2007 | A1 |
20070112574 | Greene | May 2007 | A1 |
20070185788 | Dillon | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070186106 | Ting et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070223451 | Ren et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070239350 | Zumsteg et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070248065 | Banerjea et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070260470 | Bornhoevd | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080002599 | Yau et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080010631 | Harvey et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080056261 | Osborn et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080068150 | Nguyen et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080068267 | Huseth et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080130949 | Ivanov et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080136620 | Lee et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080144587 | Gupta et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080259919 | Monga | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080291017 | Yermal et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090021634 | Chang | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090135007 | Donovan et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090222921 | Mukhopadhyay et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090243844 | Ishidera | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090322510 | Berger et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100090829 | Pujol | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100124209 | In et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100217651 | Crabtree et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100226342 | Colling et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20110051656 | Hethuin et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110069687 | Rezvani et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110102171 | Raji et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110109434 | Hadsall, Sr. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110137614 | Wheeler et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110310779 | De Poorter et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110310791 | Prakash et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120014567 | Allegra et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120039235 | Chen et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120131115 | Levell | May 2012 | A1 |
20120158161 | Cohn et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120159579 | Pineau et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120197986 | Chen et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120266168 | Spivak et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120310423 | Taft | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120311614 | Deanna et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130003645 | Shapira et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130064233 | Hethuin et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130070745 | Nixon et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130239192 | Linga et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130241744 | Erdos et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130317659 | Thomas et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130318529 | Bishop et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130336230 | Zou et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130346229 | Martin et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140035726 | Schoner et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140052832 | Dina et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140129135 | Holden et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140222892 | Lee et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20150074178 | Hong et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150248299 | Rasband et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150249588 | Leon et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150257301 | Morgan et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20170270722 | Tse et al. | Sep 2017 | A1 |
20180107880 | Danielsson et al. | Apr 2018 | A1 |
20180181794 | Benini et al. | Jun 2018 | A1 |
20190043281 | Aman | Feb 2019 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1217078 | May 1999 | CN |
1672060 | Sep 2005 | CN |
1871782 | Nov 2006 | CN |
1981313 | Jun 2007 | CN |
101199187 | Jun 2008 | CN |
101364734 | Sep 2009 | CN |
101764759 | Jun 2010 | CN |
101951341 | Jan 2011 | CN |
101976377 | Feb 2011 | CN |
101977124 | Feb 2011 | CN |
102035738 | Apr 2011 | CN |
102316053 | Jan 2012 | CN |
102325075 | Jan 2012 | CN |
202475489 | Oct 2012 | CN |
0 814 393 | Dec 1997 | EP |
1 885 039 | Sep 2012 | EP |
2005-292942 | Oct 2005 | JP |
2008-090861 | Apr 2008 | JP |
WO-0106401 | Jan 2001 | WO |
WO-0126329 | Apr 2001 | WO |
WO2004068855 | Aug 2004 | WO |
WO-2008139203 | Nov 2008 | WO |
WO-2009017687 | Feb 2009 | WO |
WO2009079036 | Jun 2009 | WO |
WO-2013091678 | Jun 2013 | WO |
WO-2013159217 | Oct 2013 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Zoumboulakis, Michael, George Roussos, and Alexandra Poulovassilis. “Active rules for sensor databases.” Proceeedings of the 1st international workshop on Data management for sensor networks: in conjunction with VLDB 2004. ACM, 2004. (Year: 2004). |
Hunkeler, Urs, Hong Linh Truong, and Andy Stanford-Clark. “MQTT-S—A publish/subscribe protocol for Wireless Sensor Networks. ” 2008 3rd International Conference on Communication Systems Software and Middleware and Workshops (COMSWARE'08). IEEE, 2008. (Year: 2008). |
Eugster, Patrick Th, et al. “The many faces of publish/subscribe.” ACM computing surveys (CSUR) 35.2 (2003): 114-131. (Year: 2003). |
International Search Report and Written Opinion, PCT/US15/17491. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion, PCT/US15/17680. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion, PCT/US15/17477. |
Supp. EP Search Report, PCT/US2015/017491. |
Ying Zhou et al., “Mobile Agent-based Policy Management for Wireless Sensor Networks,”, Wireless Communications, Networking and Mobile Computing, 2005, Proceedings 2005 Int'l Conference on Wuhan, China, vol. 2, (Sep. 23, 2005), pp. 1207-1210. |
European Search Report, PCT/US2015/017212. |
Office Action for Chinese Patent Application No. 201580016167 dated May 2, 2018. |
Cheng, Research on AODV Routing Protocol of Wireless Network, Chinese Master's Theses Full-Text Database, Information Technology Division, Jul. 15, 2007, 79 pages. |
First Office Action for Chinese Application No. 201580015282.5, dated Sep. 4, 2018, 18 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/402,423, dated Jul. 26, 2018, 10 pages. |
Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 15/366,036 dated May 31, 2018. 5 pages. |
Chinese Office Action dated May 30, 2018 in corresponding application No. 201580016948.9. |
Asada et al, Wireless Integrated Network Sensors (WINS) Proceedings of the Spie, Spie, Bellingham, VA, vol. 3673, dated Mar. 1, 1999, pp. 11-18. |
Depoorter, Eli, et al., Enabling Direct Connectivity Between Heterogeneous Objections in the Internet of Things Through a Network Service Oriented Architecture, http://jwcn.eurasigjournals.com/content/pdf/1687-1499-2011-61.pdf, dated Aug. 31, 2011, 14 pages. |
European Search Report on EP 15755714, dated Oct. 25, 2017, 11 pages. |
European Search Report on EP 15756099, dated Oct. 26, 2017, 19 pages. |
Hill et al, The Platforms Enabling Wireless Sensor Networks, Communications of the ACM, dated Jun. 2004, vol. 47, No. 6, 6 pages. |
International Extended Search Report on Application No. PCT/US00/27515, dated Oct. 18, 2001, 14 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion on Application No. PCT/US15/17688, dated Jun. 8, 2015, 10 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion on Application No. PCT/US15/17696 dated Jun. 8, 2015, 12 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion on Application No. PCT/US15/17702 dated Jun. 17, 2015, 16 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion on Application No. PCT/US15/11924, dated Jun. 5, 2015, 7 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion on Application No. PCT/US15/17931 dated Jun. 10, 2015, 11 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion on Application No. PCT/US2015/017212, dated Jun. 2, 2015, 10 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion on Application No. PCT/US2015/017221, dated May 26, 2015, 11 pages. |
International Supplementary Search Report on Application No. PCT/US2015/017931, dated Mar. 11, 2017, 11 pages. |
Office Action on Chinese Application No. 201580013946.4, dated Jul. 31, 2018, 13 pages with translation. |
Office Action on CN Application No. 201580016167.X, dated May 2, 2018, 20 page with translation. |
Second Chinese Office Action for Application No. CN 201580015274.0 dated Jul. 3, 2019, 11 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 61/946,054, filed Feb. 28, 2014, Paul B. Rasband et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 61/973,962, filed Apr. 2, 2014, Stewart E. Hall et al. |
Chen et al., Enix: a lightweight dynamic operating system for tightly constrained wireless sensor platforms, Proceedings of the 8th ACM Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems, dated Nov. 3, 2010, 14 pages. http://sensys.acm.org/2010/Papers/p183-Chen.pdf. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion on PCT/US15/017450, dated Jun. 10, 2015, 6 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion on PCT/US15/017477, dated Jun. 10, 2015, 7 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion on PCT/US15/017481, dated Jun. 10, 2015, 6 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion on PCT/US15/017491, dated Jun. 10, 2015, 6 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion on PCT/US15/024050, dated Jul. 20, 2015, 8 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion on PCT/US2015/017212, dated Jun. 2, 2015, 10 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion on PCT/US2015/017221, dated May 26, 2015, 11 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion on PCT/US2015/017491, dated Jun. 10, 2015, 15 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion on PCT/US2015/017924, dated Jun. 5, 2015, 12 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion on PCT/US2015/017931, dated Jun. 10, 2015, 11 pages. |
Office Action on CN 201580013943.0, dated Mar. 21, 2019, 20 pages with translation. |
Office Action on CN 2201580019382.5, dated Jul. 31, 2U19, 17 pages with translation. |
Office Action on CN 201580019386.3, dated Jun. 4, 2019, 34 pages with translation. |
Office Action on CN 201580019691.2, dated Apr. 29, 2019, 15 pages with translation. |
Office Action on CN 201580019697.X, dated Feb. 26, 2019, 20 pages with translation. |
Office Action on CN 201580020164.3 dated Mar. 27, 2019, 24 pages with translation. |
Office Action on CN 201580021841.3, dated Jun. 26, 2019, 16 pages with translation. |
Office Action on CN 201580026024.7, dated Jun. 4, 2019, 12 pages with translation. |
Office Action on EP 15754691.2, dated May 10, 2019, 5 pages. |
Office Action on EP 15755018.7, dated Jul. 9, 2019, 6 pages. |
Office Action on EP 15755018.7, dated Sep. 11, 2018, 5 pages. |
Office Action on EP 15755117.7, dated Aug. 9, 2019, 6 pages. |
Office Action on EP 15755330.6, dated Jun. 19, 2019, 6 pages. |
Office Action on EP 15755456.9, dated Mar. 7, 2019, 5 pages. |
Office Action on EP 15755880.0, dated Jan. 30, 2019, 5 pages. |
Office Action on JP 2016-560736, dated Feb. 5, 2019, 5 pages with translation. |
Supplementary European Search Report on 15754909.8, dated Nov. 7, 2017, 10 pages. |
Supplementary European Search Report on EP 15754818.1, dated Dec. 14, 2017, 8 pages. |
Supplementary European Search Report on 15755417.1 dated Oct. 23, 2017, 14 pages. |
Supplementary European Search Report on EP 15756099.6, dated Oct. 26, 2017, 18 pages. |
Supplementary European Search Report on EP 15774423, dated Nov. 17, 2017, 1 page. |
CP for European Patent Application No. 15754818.1 DTD Dec. 19, 2019, 6 pages. |
Search Report on EP 15774423.6 dated Jan. 7, 2020, 6 pages. |
EPO Extended Search Report dated Jul. 13, 2020—App No. 20168200.2-1213. |
Liang, “Social Network Service,” Mar. 31, 2013, pp. 137-138. English language translation unavailable. English portions only. |
Office Action on CN 201580013946.4, dated Sep. 25, 2020, 13 pages with English translation. English portions only. |
Office Action on CN 201580022068.2, dated Aug. 26, 2020, 13 pages with English translation. English portions only. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150286933 A1 | Oct 2015 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61973962 | Apr 2014 | US | |
61946054 | Feb 2014 | US |