“Not applicable”
“Not applicable”
“Not applicable”
This invention relates to improvements in runway approach procedures using the localizer alone. During the decade of the 1940's, when the ILS (Instrument Landing System) came into being, that instrument, called the “crosspointer,” was designed to display, to the pilot, the deviation from a desired landing path, one needle for left-right (localizer), the other for up-down (glide-slope). ILS is well described by W. E. Jackson in 1959 IRE Transactions and reprinted recently by C. B. Watts, Jr. in INSTRUMENT LANDING SCRAPBOOK available at TRAFFORD.com,
In a later decade, however, when there were some difficulties with installing a proper glide-slope at an airport, it was decided to authorize the use of localizer alone, leaving the one needle not operating (flagged). The desired up-down information was then obtained by using means, such as Altimeter, DME, or Global Positioning System as prescribed in the approach procedure for the particular airport. It is, however, hard to argue that it would not be good to have the glide-slope needle still operating.
This invention relates to a modification of the aircraft ILS receiving equipment such that the field strength of the localizer can be used as the basis for glide-slope indication.
It is well known that a given localizer, properly monitored on the ground, will radiate a constant field strength at any particular point in space, except for the mostly minor effects of reflections from moving objects in the vicinity. Over a flat earth, field strength tends to be proportional to altitude, and inversely proportional to the square of the distance from the station.
The method here proposed is to activate the glide-slope needle movement on the basis of the localizer field strength existing at the airplane. One concern would be regarding the pattern of the receiving antenna, especially in the vertical plane. It would not be good for the pitch attitude of the aircraft to have a major effect on the field strength measurement. A second concern is that an approach path that follows a line of constant field strength is much too steep far out, and too shallow close to the runway, as in line 8,
To accomplish this purpose, it is believed best to not modify the standard localizer receiver 12,
Step 1. modification of receiver 16.
Step 2. of the modification is more difficult, but should have the effect of producing the straight shape 10,
A simpler way to achieve the desired straight line path might be to work with the AGC circuit of the receiver 16,
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3757338 | Liebman | Sep 1973 | A |
3805588 | Stone | Apr 1974 | A |
3868689 | Liu et al. | Feb 1975 | A |
4390949 | Beningfield et al. | Jun 1983 | A |
4609921 | Flynn | Sep 1986 | A |