Sabot anti-splitting ring

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6186094
  • Patent Number
    6,186,094
  • Date Filed
    Wednesday, August 26, 1998
    26 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, February 13, 2001
    24 years ago
Abstract
A composite sabot including an anti-splitting ring connected to the composite sabot body, to prevent the sabot from splitting during discard. The composite sabot includes sabot petals with fibers oriented in the radial direction and a front scoop for gathering air particles. The anti-splitting ring is mounted to the front scoop portion of the composite sabot where splitting initiates. The anti-splitting ring may be a variety of shapes and materials and attaches easily and inexpensively to any sabot.
Description




FIELD OF THE INVENTION




The present invention is generally related to sabots, and more particularly to a composite sabot with an anti-splitting ring integral therewith.




BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION




In military ordnance arts, carriers for projectiles, known as sabots, have been used to facilitate the use of a variety of munitions while engaging in military operations.




In general, a sabot is a lightweight carrier for a projectile that permits the firing of a variety of projectiles of a smaller caliber within a larger caliber weapon. The word sabot is derived form the French word cabot, which means, “shoe.” Because a sabot fits around the projectile in a manner similar to the way a cabot, or “shoe,” slips onto a persons foot, the name has been applied to all such projectile carriers.




A sabot provides structured support to a flight projectile within a gun tube under extremely high loads. Without adequate support from a sabot, a projectile may break up into many pieces when fired.




A sabot fills the bore of the gun tube while encasing the projectile to permit uniform and smooth firing of the weapon. The projectile is centrally located within the sabot that is generally radially symmetrical. After firing, the sabot and projectile clear the bore of the gun tube and the sabot is normally discarded some distance from the gun tube while the projectile continues toward the target.




One method for discarding a sabot is to form a scoop onto the sabot. After the sabot and projectile clear the weapon bore, the scoop gathers, or “scoops,” air particles as it is moving forward. The air pressure on the front scoop lifts the sabot from the projectile and thus the sabot is removed from the projectile in flight, allowing the projectile to continue towards its target.




Additionally, sabots are generally made in three symmetrical segments to facilitate smooth discard upon exit from the gun. Typically, each segment, or petal, spans 120 degrees of the front circumference of the intact sabot. Each petal's scoop portion is still expansive enough, at 120-degrees, to serve its purpose of driving the petal away from the projectile. The three segment design allows sabot petals to discard from the projectile quickly, as opposed to, for example, a design where an intact sabot gradually slips off of the projectile. The overall advantage of a three petal sabot design is that the sabot is released more quickly, thereby reducing parasitic weight and increasing accuracy.




It is desirable to make sabots lightweight to increase the muzzle velocity of projectile at exit. At the same time, the sabot must maintain its rigidity during operation. For example, inside the bore of the weapon the sabot must stay rigid to allow smooth firing and accurate targeting. Further, once outside the bore of the weapon, the sabot must maintain rigidity in order to scoop air particles efficiently, discard its three petals, and allow acceptable projectile dispersion on the target.




The weight of sabots has been reduced considerably through the use of continuous fiber composite material. Generally, such composite sabots are mixtures of fibers and epoxy combined in a chemical molding process. The weight reductions are made possible by aligning the fibers in the longitudinal/radial plane of the sabot which matches the load directions generated during the projectile travel down the weapon bore.




Unfortunately, during sabot discard, significant circumferential, or hoop, tensile loads are created. Since no fibers are oriented in the circumferential, or hoop, direction in known lightweight sabot designs, the sabot splits along the longitudinal/radial plane typically near the middle of the sabot scoop. Compounding the problem, a faulty molding process may leave air voids in the structure of the sabot, which increases the probability that a sabot petal of conventional design will split into more than two pieces.




Consequently, composite sabot petals of conventional design usually split in the middle from the high hoop stresses generated during discard. Thus, a 120-degree petal may split into two 60-degree segments due to the lack of strength in the circumferential direction of the sabot. This could result in asymmetric discard, where the petals are released at different times, and poor projectile dispersion on the target. It also has been found that a 60-degree segment of split sabot petal is more likely to fail in the scoop or break in the saddle compared to 120-degree intact sabot petal. Further, such splits occur with considerable variation in the location and time of splitting. Thus, compensation for the sabot failure using targeting adjustments is very difficult.




Previous attempts to stop the splitting of composite sabots involved filament wrapping. In this process, the entire assembled projectiles are wrapped with filaments, and then the filament wrap is slit along the seams between the sabot petals. However, this process is unwieldy and expensive from a manufacturing standpoint. Further, filament wrapping is known to be ineffective for preventing all sabot splitting problems.




SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION




The present invention overcomes the deficiencies of the prior art by, for the first time, providing a lightweight, reliable, and inexpensive method of eliminating splitting of a composite sabots during discard using an anti-splitting ring within a composite sabot. The present invention provides a composite sabot that discards more uniformly thereby allowing increased accuracy and dispersion of projectiles fired with composite sabots. Further, the present invention provides a composite sabot design that decreases the drag on and increases velocity of a projectile fired with composite sabots.




The invention provides, for the first time, a composite sabot having an anti-splitting ring mounted to the sabot to prevent the composite sabot from splitting during discard.




In one example embodiment of the invention, a composite sabot includes sabot petals with fibers oriented in the radial direction and a front scoop for gathering air particles. An anti-splitting ring is mounted to the front scoop portion of the composite sabot where splitting initiates. The anti-splitting ring may be a variety of shapes and materials and attaches easily and inexpensively to any sabot.




Other objects, features and advantages of the present invention will become apparent to those skilled in the art through the description of the preferred embodiment, claims and drawings wherein like numerals refer to like elements.











BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS





FIG. 1

is a three dimensional perspective view of one example of the apparatus of the invention employed on a composite sabot.





FIG. 2A

is a front view of one example of the apparatus of the invention employed on a composite sabot.





FIG. 2B

is a partial view of one example of the apparatus of the invention as depicted in FIG.


2


A.





FIG. 3A

is a cross-sectional side view of one example of the apparatus of the invention employed on a composite sabot.





FIG. 3B

is a partial view of one example of the apparatus of the invention as depicted in FIG.


3


A.





FIG. 4A

is a partial cross-sectional side view of an alternative example of the apparatus of the invention employed on a composite sabot.





FIG. 4B

is a partial cross-sectional side view of an alternative example of the apparatus of the invention employed on a composite sabot.





FIG. 4C

is a partial cross-sectional side view of an alternative example of the apparatus of the invention employed on a composite sabot.











DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION




Illustrated in

FIG. 1

is a three dimensional perspective view of a composite sabot


10


in accordance with the present invention. The composite sabot


10


has a sabot body


20


, an anti-splitting ring


50


, and a penetrator


60


.




The sabot body


20


has a front scoop


30


for trapping air particles. The front scoop has a front edge


40


for mounting the anti-splitting ring


50


. In this example of the present invention, the sabot body


20


is nominally radially divided along three petal divisions


24


into three 120-degree sabot petals


22


. Each sabot petal


22


has a front scoop segment


32


. Each front scoop segment


32


has a front edge segment


42


. Accordingly, the anti-splitting ring


50


is also nominally divided along three ring divisions


54


into three 120-degree anti-splitting ring segments


52


(shown in FIG.


2


B). In one useful embodiment, the petal divisions


24


and the ring divisions


54


are advantageously aligned so that one ring segment


52


substantially covers a mating front edge segment


42


. Fully assembled, the sabot petals


22


and the anti-splitting ring segments


52


encompass the penetrator


60


.




When fired, and after the composite sabot


10


exits from a gun tube, the sabot body


20


releases the penetrator


60


. Release occurs as the front scoop


30


traps or “scoops” air particles. The air particles create lift forces


70


that separate the sabot body


20


, along the petal divisions


24


, into its corresponding sabot petals


22


. Accordingly, as the sabot body


20


separates, the anti-splitting ring


50


also separates along the ring divisions


54


. As the sabot petals


22


are separating, the front scoop segments


32


provide enough surface area to allow total separation from and release of the penetrator


60


. This release process is called discard.




Illustrated in

FIG. 2A

is a front view of the front scoop


30


of a composite sabot of the present invention taken generally along the line


2


A—


2


A of FIG.


1


. This view shows the front scoop


30


with the front edge


40


. The anti-splitting ring


50


is mounted on the front edge


40


, and thus, hides the front edge


40


from view. The anti-splitting ring


50


may be integrally connected to the front edge


40


or mounted using a wide variety of known structural adhesives. This view more clearly shows that the ring divisions


54


are aligned with the petal divisions


24


and that the fully assembled sabot petals encompass the penetrator


60


.




Further,

FIG. 2A

shows the high hoop stresses


220


that are generated on the front scoop segments


32


during discard. The anti-splitting ring


50


prevents the hoop stresses


220


from splitting the front edge segments


42


(shown in

FIG. 1 and 2B

) of the sabot petals


22


throughout the entire discard process.




Illustrated in

FIG. 2B

is a detailed partial view of the front scoop segment


32


of FIG.


2


A. Front scoop segment


32


has wedges


210


aligned in the radial direction. Each wedge


210


is comprised of wedge fibers


212


aligned in the same direction as the wedges


210


. The radial alignment of the wedges


210


matches loads created during the firing of the composite sabot


10


.




However, during discard, the high hoop stresses


220


generate loads in the circumferential direction; thus, the wedges


210


are not oriented in the proper direction to withstand the hoop stresses


220


. Consequently, the wedges


210


begin to split. In other mechanisms built without the benefit of the anti-splitting ring of the invention, splitting would initiate in the middle of a front edge segment


42


at split point


230


and travel down the length of the sabot petal


22


as the wedges


210


progressively fail.




Further, in such other devices, when splitting occurs, it also has been found that the front scoop segment


32


will fail to provide sufficient trapping of air particles after the sabot petals


22


have begun to separate. Consequently, discard could be asymmetric or the sabot petals


22


could break.




As mentioned hereinabove, the anti-splitting ring


50


of the invention advantageously prevents the hoop stresses


220


from splitting the front edge segments


42


. The anti-splitting ring


50


prevents splitting because it is oriented in the same direction as the hoop stresses


220


and provides the wedge fibers


212


with sufficient circumferential strength to withstand splitting. The anti-splitting ring segments


52


also prevent the front scoop segments


32


from splitting, to allow for proper release of the penetrator


60


throughout the discard process.




Illustrated in

FIG. 3A

is a cross-sectional view of the composite sabot


10


of the present invention taken generally along the line


3


A—


3


A of FIG.


2


A. This view shows a portion of sabot body


20


, anti-splitting ring


50


, and a portion of penetrator


60


. The anti-splitting ring


50


is mounted to the front edge


40


of front scoop


30


.




Illustrated in

FIG. 3B

is a detailed partial view of the front scoop


30


of FIG.


3


. This view shows front scoop


30


with front edge


40


. The anti-splitting ring


50


is mounted to front edge


40


. In this example of the present invention, the anti-splitting ring


50


has a U-shaped cross-section


310


.




The anti-splitting ring


50


of

FIG. 3A

has a first bottom wall


320


, a first front wall


322


, and a top wall


324


that combine to form the U-shape cross-section


310


of this example of the anti-splitting ring


50


. The U-shape cross-section


310


allows the anti-splitting ring


50


to easily mate with the front edge


40


providing circumferential strength to front scoop


30


and the wedge fibers


212


(as shown in FIG.


2


B). The anti-splitting ring


50


with the U-shape cross-section


310


also reinforces and encloses the split point


230


.




Illustrated in

FIG. 4A

is an alternate embodiment of the present invention with a detailed partial view of the front scoop


30


with a second anti-splitting ring


408


. This view shows front scoop


30


with front edge


40


. A second anti-splitting ring


408


is mounted to front edge


40


. In this example of the present invention, the second anti-splitting ring


408


has an L-shaped cross-section


410


.




The second anti-splitting ring


408


of

FIG. 4A

has a second bottom wall


412


and a second front wall


414


that combine to form the L-shape cross-section


410


of the second anti-splitting ring


408


. The L-shape cross-section


410


allows the second anti-splitting ring


408


to easily couple with the front edge


40


providing circumferential strength to front scoop


30


and the wedge fibers


212


(as shown in FIG.


2


B). The second anti-splitting ring


408


with the L-shape cross-section


410


also reinforces and encloses the split point


230


.




Illustrated in

FIG. 4B

is an alternate embodiment of the present invention with a detailed partial view of the front scoop


30


with a third anti-splitting ring


418


. This view shows front scoop


30


with front edge


40


. The third anti-splitting ring


418


is mounted to front edge


40


. In this example of the present invention, the third anti-splitting ring


418


has a curved cross-section


420


.




The third anti-splitting ring


418


of

FIG. 4B

has a first single wall


422


that forms the curved cross-section


420


of this example of the third anti-splitting ring


418


. The curved cross-section


420


allows the third anti-splitting ring


418


to connect with the front edge


40


providing circumferential strength to front scoop


30


and the wedge fibers


212


(as shown in FIG.


2


B). The third anti-splitting ring


418


with the curved cross-section


420


also reinforces the split point


230


.




Illustrated in

FIG. 4C

is an alternate embodiment of the present invention with a detailed partial view of the front scoop


30


with a fourth anti-splitting ring


428


. This view shows front scoop


30


with front edge


40


. The fourth anti-splitting ring


428


is mounted to front edge


40


. In this example of the present invention, the fourth anti-splitting ring


428


has a rectangular cross-section


430


.




The fourth anti-splitting ring


428


of

FIG. 4C

has a second single wall


432


that forms the rectangular cross-section


430


of this example of the fourth anti-splitting ring


428


. The rectangular cross-section


430


allows the fourth anti-splitting ring


428


to connect with the front edge


40


providing circumferential strength to front scoop


30


and the wedge fibers


212


(as shown in FIG.


2


B). The fourth anti-splitting ring


428


with the rectangular cross-section


430


also reinforces the split point


230


.




The invention has been described herein in considerable detail in order to comply with the Patent Statutes and to provide those skilled in the art with the information needed to apply the novel principles of the present invention, and to construct and use such exemplary and specialized components as are required. However, it is to be understood that the invention may be carried out by specifically different equipment and devices, and that various modifications, both as to the equipment details and operating procedures, may be accomplished without departing from the true spirit and scope of the present invention.




More specifically, materials for anti-splitting ring


50


may be chosen from a wide array of materials to serve the intended purpose. The material may be selected from a wide array of metallic materials and alloys, as well as, composite fiber, thermoset or thermoplastic resins and epoxies to serve the intended function and accommodate manufacturing processing to achieve the integral structure as indicated herein. Other resins known to one skilled in the art may be employed as appropriate,




For example, the anti-splitting ring of the invention may advantageously be comprised of material selected from the group consisting of metal, a continuous fiber/epoxy system, a chopped fiber/epoxy system, a thermoset fiber/epoxy system, a thermoplastic fiber/epoxy system, a continuous thermoset fiber/epoxy system, a chopped thermoset fiber/epoxy system, a continuous thermoplastic fiber/epoxy system, a chopped thermoplastic fiber/epoxy system, a thermoset fiber/resin system, a thermoplastic fiber/resin system, a continuous thermoset fiber/resin system, a chopped thermoset fiber/resin system, a continuous thermoplastic fiber/resin system, and a chopped thermoplastic fiber/resin system.




As a further example, fibers employed for making the anti-splitting ring may advantageously include glass fibers, graphite fibers, carbon fibers, boron fibers or any other fibrous materials suitable for making lightweight anti-splitting rings. Suitable metals include aluminum, and any other suitable metal or metal alloys. The anti-splitting ring may be shaped and manufactured using any well known machining or other fabrication techniques from the metal arts or the composite fiber arts as the case may be.




Lastly, the anti-splitting ring


50


may have many possible configurations in addition to those configurations shown in FIGS.


3


B and

FIGS. 4A-4C

. These and other modifications are all intended to be within the true spirit and scope of the present invention.



Claims
  • 1. An anti-splitting ring for a composite sabot having a front scoop with a front edge, wherein said anti-splitting ring is mounted on said front edge andsaid anti-splitting ring comprises a plurality of ring segments.
  • 2. The anti-splitting ring of claim 1 wherein said anti-splitting ring further comprises a U-shaped cross-section.
  • 3. The anti-splitting ring of claim 1 wherein said anti-splitting ring further comprises an L-shaped cross-section.
  • 4. The anti-splitting ring of claim 1 wherein said anti-splitting ring further comprises a rectangular cross-section.
  • 5. The anti-splitting ring of claim 1 wherein said anti-splitting ring further comprises a curved cross-section.
  • 6. The anti-splitting ring of claim 1 wherein said anti-splitting ring further comprises a U-shaped cross-section.
  • 7. The anti-splitting ring of claim 1 wherein said anti-splitting ring further comprises an L-shaped cross-section.
  • 8. The anti-splitting ring of claim 1 wherein said anti-splitting ring further comprises a metal ring.
  • 9. The anti-splitting ring of claim 1 wherein said anti-splitting ring is comprised of material selected from the group consisting of metal, a continuous fiber/epoxy system, a chopped fiber/epoxy system, a thermoset fiber/epoxy system, a thermoplastic fiber/epoxy system, a continuous thermoset fiber/epoxy system, a chopped thermoset fiber/epoxy system, a continuous thermoplastic fiber/epoxy system, a chopped thermoplastic fiber/epoxy system a thermoset fiber/resin system, a thermoplastic fiber/resin system, a continuous thermoset fiber/resin system, a chopped thermoset fiber/resin system, a continuous thermoplastic fiber/resin system, a chopped thermoplastic fiber/resin system, and aluminum.
  • 10. A composite sabot comprising:(a) a plurality of sabot petals; (b) a plurality of front scoop segments integrally connected to said sabot petals; (c) a plurality of front edge segments integrally connected to said front scoop segments; (d) an anti-splitting ring mounted on said front edges, wherein said anti-splitting ring comprises a plurality of ring segments; and (e) a penetrator encompassed within said sabot petals.
  • 11. The composite sabot of claim 10 wherein said anti-splitting ring further comprises a U-shaped cross-section.
  • 12. The composite sabot of claim 10 wherein said anti-splitting ring further comprises an L-shaped cross-section.
  • 13. The composite sabot of claim 10 wherein said anti-splitting ring further comprises a rectangular cross-section.
  • 14. The composite sabot of claim 10 wherein said anti-splitting ring further comprises a curved cross-section.
  • 15. A method of fabricating a composite sabot, comprising the steps of:(a) fabricating a plurality of sabot petals using fibers and thermoset or thermoplastic resins; (b) simultaneously fabricating a plurality of front scoop segments, each front scoop segment integrally connected to one of said sabot petals; (c) simultaneously fabricating a plurality of front edge segments, each front edge segment integrally connected to one of said front scoop segments; (d) assembling the sabot segments around a penetrator; (e) fabricating an anti-splitting ring; and (f) mounting said anti-splitting ring on said front edge segments.
  • 16. The composite sabot of claim 15 further comprising the step of fabricating said anti-splitting ring with a plurality of ring segments.
  • 17. The composite sabot of claim 15 further comprising the step of fabricating said anti-splitting ring with a U-shaped cross-section.
  • 18. The composite sabot of claim 15 further comprising the step of fabricating said anti-splitting ring with an L-shaped cross-section.
  • 19. The composite sabot of claim 15 further comprising the step of fabricating said anti-splitting ring with a rectangular cross-section.
  • 20. The composite sabot of claim 15 further comprising the step of fabricating said anti-splitting ring with a curved cross-section.
U.S. GOVERNMENT RIGHTS

The United States Government has certain rights to this invention under government contract number DAAE30-97-C-1006.

US Referenced Citations (11)
Number Name Date Kind
H165 Silsby Nov 1986
4215632 Sie Aug 1980
4546705 Langenohl et al. Oct 1985
4603636 Wallow Aug 1986
4823703 Donaldson Apr 1989
4867067 Becker et al. Sep 1989
5103735 Kaste et al. Apr 1992
5635660 McGovern Jun 1997
5640054 McGovern Jun 1997
5747725 Stewart et al. May 1998
5789699 Stewart et al. Aug 1998
Foreign Referenced Citations (3)
Number Date Country
1401792 Apr 1965 FR
2343218 Sep 1977 FR
2251676 Jul 1991 GB