I. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to launch packages that feature sabots to gun launch sub-caliber projectiles and penetrators.
II. Description of Related Art
Sabots have been long used, especially in military applications, to fire a projectile from a gun that is smaller than the bore diameter of the gun. Since the projectile is smaller than the diameter of the gun, it is necessary to trap the propellant gases inside the gun and behind the projectile while the projectile travels along the length of the gun. In order to achieve this, a sabot, comprised of a number of petals, is disposed around the projectile while an obturator around the petal ideally sealingly engages the internal bore of the gun. Once the projectile with the sabot exits from the gun, the sabot petals separate from the projectile so that only the projectile continues from the gun to the target.
In order to maximize the projectile velocity, previously known sabots have utilized composite materials adhered together and then machined or otherwise constructed to form the sabot petal. In one previously known sabot, a plurality of composite sheets of the same length and thickness are cut to differing widths and are stacked one upon the other such that the stacked sheets form a wedge. A number of wedges are then adhered together by a resin matrix to form a sabot petal so that the center sheet of composite material of each wedge lies in a radial plane. The shape of the sabot petal is then formed, for example, by turning the composite material on a lathe and then machining the sabot petal to the desired diameters. At least two, and typically three or more, petals then form the sabot.
Many of the previously known sabots were intended for use with a smooth bore gun barrel. Consequently, upon firing, the sabot is not subjected to large torsional loads.
Conversely, if the sabot is launched from a rifled barrel, the entire sabot is subjected to torsional loads due to the barrel rifling. For sabots constructed from sheets of composite material, the torsional load imposed during launch upon the sabot petal has been known to delaminate which can lead to not only inaccurate targeting of the projectile, but even safety issues if the delamination is severe.
The present invention provides a sabot which overcomes the above mentioned disadvantages of the previously known sabots.
In brief, the launch package of the present invention includes the sabot and an elongated sub-projectile. Sabot petals are then mounted around the sub-projectile so that the axis of the sub-projectile and sabot petals is parallel to or coincides with the launch axis from the gun.
The sabot petal is constructed from a plurality of wedges each formed from stacked sheets of composite material comprised of the fiber reinforcement and polymer resin matrix. Each sheet of composite material lies in a plane that is rotationally offset from the meridional plane of the cylindrical coordinate system defined by the launch axis of the gun and the arbitrary and orthogonal radial axis, where the cylindrical axial axis is collinear with the axis of the gun. The rotational offset between the composite material plane and the meridional plane is the preset angle. This preset angle for the rear portion of the sabot rear of the slipband or obturator, preferably, is in a direction opposite from the direction of rotation of the sabot during launch through a rifled gun bore. The preset angle for the forward portion of the sabot may be in the same direction as the sabot rotation during launch through a rifled gun bore. Thus, in certain embodiments the present angle in the forward portion is in the opposite direction of the preset angle in the rear portion of the sabot. In practice, the small angular offset of the sheets of composite material from the radius of the sabot petal is sufficient to resist delamination of the sabot petal during launch from a rifled gun barrel. Typically, the angular offset is in the range of 1-15 degrees.
In a modification of the invention, in order to further protect the sabot petal from delamination during launch a metal bulkhead overwrap is disposed around the projectile at the bulkhead or location of the obturator. This metal bulkhead overwrap, furthermore, may be splined to the projectile so that the bulkhead overwrap rotates in unison with the projectile. By providing such a hybrid sabot, i.e. a sabot with both the metal overwrap and the composite petal, the torsional load on the composite petal of the sabot is greatly reduced during launch.
A better understanding of the present invention will be had upon reference to the following detailed description when read in conjunction with the accompanying drawing, wherein like reference characters refer to like parts throughout the several views, and in which:
With reference first to
The launch package 11 is adapted to be launched from a gun barrel along a predetermined launch axis. This launch axis is parallel to or coincides with an axis 19 of the sub-projectile 12.
The diameter of the sub-projectile 12 is less than the inside diameter of the gun bore used to launch the launch package 11. Consequently, the launch package 11 includes a sabot 10 which is comprised of a number of petals 20 that encase at least a portion of the sub-projectile 12.
With reference still to
The bulkhead 22 carries the slipband obturator 30 for the sabot 10. As best shown in
With reference now to
Each wedge 32 is substantially identical to the other wedges 32. Consequently, only a single wedge 32 will be described in detail, it being understood that a similar description will also apply to the remaining wedges 32.
With reference then to
The sheets 36, furthermore, are oriented so that their plane normal is not orthogonal to the radial axis of the sabot 10. Specifically, the sheets 36 are oriented so that their plane normal is not orthogonal to the meridional plane defined by the sabot's radial and axial axes nor parallel to the meridional plane defined by the sabot's radial and axial axes. Thus, the sheets are not radially oriented nor perpendicularly oriented to the axis of the sabot and are offset from the radial axis of the sabot by a specific angle. Additionally, the plane of each sheet 36 is purposely angularly offset from a radial axis of the sabot 10 axis by a preset angular amount α. In other words, the sheets 36 are oriented in a plane that is rotated relative to the meridional plane defined by the radial and axial axes of the sabot petal. The angle between the composite plane containing the individual sheets 36 and the meridional plane is the preset angle α. This preset angular amount a is preferably in the range of from about 1 to about 20 degrees, preferably in the range of from about 1 to about 15 degrees, more preferably in the range of from about 2 to about 10 degrees and still more preferably in the range of from about 5 to about 10 degrees. For example, the sheets 36 of composite material illustrated in
In operation, the angular offset a of the sheets 36 of composite material relative to the sabot 10 radial axis has been found to effectively prevent delamination of the sheets 36 of composite material during the gun launch of the sabot. Immediately following launch, the individual sabot petals 20 separate from the sub-projectile 12 in the conventional fashion.
It has been observed that even though the slipband 30 (
In order to further reduce the torsional load on the sabot petal, as best shown in
A metal bulkhead overwrap section 48 is disposed within the bulkhead channel 42. Preferably, the bulkhead overwrap assembly 46 is constructed in multiple, for example three separate bulkhead sections 48 (
Each bulkhead overwrap section 48 preferably comprises a bulkhead arch 50 made of metal which extends around the outer periphery of the bulkhead 22. A V-spar 52, also made of metal, is then secured to the bulkhead arch 50 by any conventional means, such as screws 54. The combination of the metal V-spar 52 and metal bulkhead arch 50 provides a rigid and yet relatively lightweight construction.
All bulkhead overwrap sections 48 are preferably secured to the sub-projectile 12 against rotation. In order to accomplish this, the V-spar 52 of each section 48 preferably includes a plurality of longitudinally extending splines 56 which mesh with like shaped splines formed in the sub-projectile 12. A slipband 58 (
In practice, any torsional load imposed by the slipband on the assembly of bulkhead overwrap sections 48 is transmitted directly to the sub-projectile 12, rather than the sabot petal 20. As such, the possibility of delamination of the sabot petal 20 caused by the torsional load of a rifled gun barrel during launch is decreased.
From the foregoing, it can be seen that the present invention provides a simple yet effective sabot which is particularly useful in military applications. Having described my invention, however, many modifications thereto will become apparent to those skilled in the art to which it pertains without deviation from the spirit of the invention as defined by the scope of the appended claims.
This application is a divisional of and claims priority to application Ser. No. 13/530,319 titled “Sabot” filed on Jun. 22, 2012, the entire contents of which are hereby incorporated by reference herein, and further claims benefit of U.S. Provisional patent application Ser. No. 61/499,774 titled “Sabots for Rifled Guns” filed on Jun. 22, 2011 listing Michael A. Minnicino II as a sole inventor, the entire contents, including all attachments and appendices of which are hereby incorporated herein by reference.
The invention described herein may be manufactured, used, and licensed by or for the United States Government.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4187783 | Campoli et al. | Feb 1980 | A |
4802415 | Clarke et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
4833995 | Gotz et al. | May 1989 | A |
5359938 | Campoli et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5640054 | McGovern | Jun 1997 | A |
5789699 | Stewart et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
6125764 | Kamdar | Oct 2000 | A |
6186094 | Kamdar | Feb 2001 | B1 |
7594472 | Parratt et al. | Sep 2009 | B1 |
7935208 | Park et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
20040244631 | Eches et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050188891 | Heitmann et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20060032394 | Eches et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20090107355 | Park et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20100276082 | Park et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2004108732 | Apr 2004 | JP |
2004024334 | Mar 2004 | KR |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140305329 A1 | Oct 2014 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61499774 | Jun 2011 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13530319 | Jun 2012 | US |
Child | 14164735 | US |