The present invention relates to methods, systems and apparatus for stabilizing junctions between bone structures. More particularly, the present invention relates to methods, systems and apparatus for stabilizing dysfunctional sacroiliac (SI) joints.
As is well known in the art, the sacroiliac (SI) joint 6 comprises a diarthrodial synovial joint, which, as illustrated in
As is also well known in the art, the SI joint further comprises articular cartilage, i.e., hyaline and fibrocartilage, and a strong, extensive ligamentous architecture, which stabilizes the SI joint.
Generally, the articular surfaces of the sacrum 2 and the ilium 4 that define the SI joint 6 comprise cortical bone 8, which is more compact, dense and hard relative to softer trabecular bone 10, which, as further illustrated in
The SI Joint is distinguished from other synovial joints by the atypical articulation of the different articular surfaces of the sacrum and ilium; the articular surface of the sacrum comprising hyaline cartilage and the articular surface of the ilium comprising substantially stronger fibrocartilage.
As is further well known in the art, the primary plane of motion of the SI joint is anterior-posterior along a transverse axis. The terms often employed to describe the relative motion of the sacrum and ilium are nutation, which refers to anterior-inferior movement of the sacrum while the coccyx (denoted “3” in
In most healthy individuals, the SI joint range of motion in flexion-extension is approximately 3°, approximately 1.5° in axial rotation and approximately 0.8° in lateral bending.
As is well established, the SI joint performs several seminal biomechanical functions. The primary functions of the SI joint are to attenuate loads exerted on the upper body and to distribute the loads to the lower extremities. The SI joint also functions as a shock absorber for loads exerted on spine.
As Is also well established, the noted loads and, hence, forces exerted on the SI joint can adversely affect the biomechanical functions of the SI joint, which can, and often will, result in SI joint dysfunction—an often-overlooked musculoskeletal pathology associated with lower back pain.
Indeed, SI joint dysfunction is estimated to be the primary cause of lower back pain in 15-30% of subjects afflicted with such pain. However, lower back pain associated with SI joint dysfunction is suspected to be far more common than most healthcare providers realize, since such pain is often associated with other skeletal and musculoskeletal dysfunctions.
SI joint dysfunction, and pain associated therewith, can be caused by various SI joint abnormalities and/or disorders, including traumatic fracture dislocation of the pelvis, degenerative arthritis, sacroiliitis, i.e., an inflammation or degenerative condition of the sacroiliac joint; osteitis condensans ilii, and other degenerative conditions of the SI joint structures.
Various ram-surgical methods, such as administration of pharmacological agents, e.g., the corticosteroid prednisone, and surgical methods and devices, i.e., prostheses, have been developed and employed to treat SI joint dysfunction.
The most common approach employed to treat SI joint dysfunctions (when non-surgical treatments fail to ameliorate pain associated therewith), at present, is SI joint stabilization, i.e., reinforcing or modulating articulation by and between the sacrum and ilium, via surgical intervention.
SI joint stabilization typically comprises surgical placement of a prosthesis proximate to or in a dysfunctional SI joint and is generally characterized by the direction of access to the dysfunctional SI joint, i.e., anterior, posterior or lateral.
Although several conventional SI joint stabilization surgical methods and associated bone prostheses have effectively ameliorated pain associated with SI joint dysfunction, there remains many disadvantages associated with the conventional methods and associated prostheses.
A major disadvantage associated with many conventional SI joint stabilization surgical methods is that the surgeon is required to make a substantial incision in and through the skin and tissues of a subject to access the dysfunctional SI joint. Often referred to as “open surgery” methods, these surgical methods have the attendant disadvantages of requiring general anesthesia and often involve increased operative time, pain, hospitalization, and recovery time due to the extensive soft tissue damage. There is also an increased probability of post-surgical complication associated with open surgery methods, such as nosocomial infection.
Minimally-invasive methods for SI joint stabilization have thus been developed to address the noted disadvantages associated with open surgery methods. Although conventional minimally-invasive SI joint stabilization methods, such as the methods disclosed in U.S. Pub. No. 2009/0076551 to Petersen, have garnered some success in relieving pain associated with SI joint dysfunction and have effectively addressed many of the disadvantages associated with open surgery methods, there similarly remains many disadvantages associated with conventional minimally-invasive SI joint stabilization methods.
A major disadvantage associated with many conventional minimally-invasive SI joint stabilization methods is that such methods are difficult to perform and, hence, often require extensive, system-specific surgical training and experience. Despite the level of surgical training and experience that surgeons possess, when such conventional minimally-invasive SI joint stabilization methods are employed, there is still a substantial incidence of damage to the lumbosacral neurovascular structures proximate to the SI joint.
A further disadvantage associated with many conventional minimally-invasive SI joint stabilization methods and associated apparatus, i.e., prostheses, such as the methods and prostheses disclosed in U.S. Pub. No. 2009/0076551 to Petersen, is that pre-existing sacral abnormalities can lead to displacement of the implanted prostheses, which can, and often will result in damage to surrounding bone and soft tissue structures.
An additional disadvantage associated with many conventional minimally invasive SI joint stabilization methods is that they comprise anterior or lateral approaches to the dysfunctional SI joint and, hence, muscles, e.g., gluteal aponeurotic fascia and gluteus medius, and ligaments are typically disrupted, and nerves and blood vessels are susceptible to damage during placement of a prosthesis in a dysfunctional SI joint.
Further, some conventional minimally-invasive SI joint stabilization methods are particularly prone to failure due to displacement of the prostheses in the dysfunctional SI joint and/or failure of the prostheses to effectively engage the SI joint structures, e.g., articular surfaces of the sacrum and/or ilium.
Various “improved” prostheses have thus been developed for use in minimally-invasive SI joint stabilization methods or procedures to effectively engage SI joint structures and maintain engagement thereto during SI joint function.
Although many of the “improved” prostheses, when deployed properly in a dysfunctional SI joint can, and often will, effectively engage SI joint structures, there remains several disadvantages associated with the prostheses. Illustrative are the prostheses disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 8,951,254 to Mayer, et al.
The prostheses disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 8,951,254 comprise or are coated with a liquefiable synthetic polymer that is adapted to liquefy upon administration of mechanical energy, e.g., high frequency vibration, when implanted and re-solidify thereafter to securely engage the SI joint structures, i.e., sacrum and ilium.
A major disadvantage associated with the prostheses disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 8,951,254 is that the liquefiable synthetic polymers, when re-solidified in situ, are structurally inferior to the osseous or bone tissue of the sacrum and ilium. The fusion sites between the articular surfaces of the sacrum and ilium that define the SI joint are, thus, highly susceptible to structural fatigue and failure, which can, and often will, result in misalignment of the SI joint and ultimately increased pain for the subject.
A further disadvantage associated with the prostheses disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 8,951,254 is that the synthetic liquefiable synthetic polymers are also substantially immunogenic and will induce an adverse immune response when the prostheses are implanted in a dysfunctional SI joint. As is well established, the adverse immune response can, and often will, prevent healing and osteogenic processes, e.g., remodeling of damaged osseous tissue and regeneration of new osseous tissue.
Additional disadvantages associated with the prostheses disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 8,951,254 and many other prostheses designed for minimally-invasive SI joint stabilization are that the noted prostheses are difficult to accurately place in optimum positions in a dysfunctional SI joint and, in many instances, lack sufficient structural properties, such as rigidity and/or fatigue resistance, to effectively stabilize the dysfunctional SI joint.
It would thus be desirable to provide SI joint stabilization systems and apparatus, which substantially reduce or eliminate the disadvantages associated with conventional SI joint stabilization systems and apparatus.
It is therefore an object of the invention to provide improved SI joint stabilization systems and apparatus, which substantially reduce or eliminate the disadvantages associated with conventional SI joint stabilization systems and apparatus.
It is another object of the invention to provide improved minimally-invasive SI joint stabilization systems and apparatus, which can be readily employed to place prostheses in and, thereby, stabilize dysfunctional SI joints via a posterior approach.
It is another object of the invention to provide improved minimally-invasive SI joint stabilization systems and apparatus, which can be readily employed to stabilize dysfunctional SI joints.
It is another object of the invention to provide improved minimally-invasive SI joint stabilization systems and apparatus, which, when implanted in a dysfunctional SI joint, effectively ameliorate pain associated with the SI joint dysfunction.
It is another object of the invention to provide improved SI joint prostheses that can readily be employed in minimally-invasive SI joint stabilization methods and provide secure engagement to SI joint structures.
It is another object of the invention to provide improved SI joint prostheses that can readily be employed in minimally-invasive SI joint stabilization methods and possess optimal structural properties to effectively stabilize dysfunctional SI joints.
It is yet another object of the invention to provide improved SI joint prostheses that can readily be employed in minimally-invasive SI joint stabilization methods and facilitate remodeling of damaged osseous tissue and regeneration of new osseous tissue and osseous tissue structures.
The present invention is directed to minimally-invasive methods, systems and apparatus for stabilizing dysfunctional SI joints.
In some embodiments of the invention, there are thus provided minimally-invasive systems and associated prostheses for stabilizing dysfunctional SI joints. In one embodiment, there is thus a SI joint stabilization prosthesis for stabilizing a dysfunctional SI joint comprising:
In some embodiments, the fixation composition further comprises a photoinitiator comprising 2-hydroxy-1-[4-hydroxyethoxy) phenyl]-2-methyl-1-propanone, 2,2-dimethoxy-2-phenylacetophenone, titanocenes, fluorinated diaryltitanocenes, iron arene complexes, manganese decacarbonyl or methylcyclopentadienyl manganese tricarbonyl.
In some embodiments, the radiation energy comprises ultraviolet (UV) light radiation in the range of 10-400 nm.
In some embodiments, the fixation composition further comprises a bone morphogenic protein (BMP) comprising BMP-1, BMP2a, BMP2b, BMP3, BMP4, BMP5, BMP6, BMP7 or BMP8a.
In some embodiments, the fixation composition further comprises an antibiotic and/or an anti-inflammatory.
Further features and advantages will become apparent from the following and more particular description of the preferred embodiments of the invention, as illustrated in the accompanying drawings, and in which like referenced characters generally refer to the same parts or elements throughout the views, and in which:
Before describing the present invention in detail, it is to be understood that this invention is not limited to particularly exemplified apparatus, systems, structures or methods as such may, of course, vary. Thus, although a number of apparatus, systems and methods similar or equivalent to those described herein can be used in the practice of the present invention, the preferred apparatus, systems, structures and methods are described herein.
It is also to be understood that, although the present invention is described and illustrated in connection with sacroiliac (SI) joint stabilization, fixation and fusion procedures, the invention is not limited to such procedures. According to the invention, the apparatus, systems and methods of the invention can also be employed to stabilize and/or fuse other articulating bone structures, including, without limitation, spinal vertebrae, tarsal bones and the like.
It is also to be understood that the terminology used herein is for the purpose of describing particular embodiments of the invention only and is not intended to be limiting.
Unless defined otherwise, all technical and scientific terms used herein have the same meaning as commonly understood by one having ordinary skill in the art to which the invention pertains.
Further, all publications, patents and patent applications cited herein, whether supra or infra, are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety.
As used in this specification and the appended claims, the singular forms “a, “an” and “the” include plural referents unless the content clearly dictates otherwise. Thus, for example, reference to “an incision” includes two or more incisions and the like.
Further, ranges can be expressed herein as from “about” or “approximately” one particular value, and/or to “about” or “approximately” another particular value. When such a range is expressed, another embodiment includes from the one particular value and/or to the other particular value. Similarly, when values are expressed as approximations, by use of the antecedent “about” or “approximately”, it will be understood that the particular value forms another embodiment. It will be further understood that the endpoints of each of the ranges are significant both in relation to the other endpoint, and independently of the other endpoint.
It is also understood that there are a number of values disclosed herein, and that each value is also herein disclosed as “about” or “approximately” that particular value in addition to the value itself. For example, if the value “10” is disclosed, then “approximately 10” is also disclosed. It is also understood that when a value is disclosed that “less than or equal to” the value, “greater than or equal to the value” and possible ranges between values are also disclosed, as appropriately understood by the skilled artisan. For example, if the value “10” is disclosed then “less than or equal to 10” as well as “greater than or equal to 10” is also disclosed.
The terms “sacroiliac joint”, “SI joint”, “sacroiliac junction” and “SI junction” are used interchangeably herein, and mean and include any region proximate to articulating regions of the sacrum and ilium bone structures and, hence, a junction between and defined by sacrum and ilium bone structures.
The term “dysfunctional” as used in connection with a SI joint, means and includes a physiological abnormality, disorder or impairment of an SI joint, including, but limited to, traumatic fracture dislocation of the pelvis, degenerative arthritis, sacroiliitis, i.e., an inflammation or degenerative condition of the SI joint; osteitis condensans ilii, and other degenerative conditions of SI joint bone structures.
The terms “articular surface” and “articulating surface” are used interchangeably herein in connection with bone structures; particularly, the sacrum and ilium bone structures, and mean and include a surface of a bone structure that forms an articulating junction (i.e., a synovial joint) with an adjacent bone structure, e.g., the articular surfaces of the sacrum and ilium bone structures.
The terms “fusion” and “arthrodesis” are used interchangeably herein in connection with bone structures, and mean and include partial or complete immobilization of adjacent bone structures; particularly, the sacrum and ilium bone structures.
The term “stabilization”, as used herein, means and includes reinforcing, e.g., supporting, or modulating motion of adjacent articular bone structures; particularly, the sacrum and ilium bone structures. The term “stabilization”, thus, in some instances, means and includes fusion and arthrodesis of adjacent bone structures.
The term “prosthesis”, as used herein in connection with bone structures, means and includes a system or apparatus configured and adapted to stabilize or modulate motion of articulating bone structures; particularly, the sacrum and ilium bone structures.
The term “biodegradable”, as used herein, means the ability of a material; particularly, a polymer or adhesive, to breakdown and be absorbed within the physiological environment of a SI joint and/or a structure associated therewith, including sacrum and ilium bone structures, by one or more physical, chemical, or cellular processes.
Biodegradable polymers, according to the invention, thus include, without limitation, polylactide polymers (PLA), copolymers of lactic and glycolic acids, including poly(lactic-co-glycolic) acid (PLGA) and poly(s-caprolactone-co-L-lactic) acid (PCL-LA); glycine/PLA co-polymers, polyethylene oxide (PEO)/PLA block copolymers, acetylated polyvinyl alcohol (PVA)/polycaprolactone copolymers, poly(glycerol sebacate) (PGS) and its derivatives, including poly(glycerol-co-sebacate acrylate) (PGSA); poly(polyol sebacate) (PPS), poly(xylitol sebacate) (PXS), poly(xylitol glutamate sebacate) (PXGS), hydroxybutyrate-hydroxyvalerate copolymers, polyesters such as, but not limited to, aspartic acid and different aliphatic diols; poly(alkylene tartrates) and their copolymers with polyurethanes, polyglutamates with various ester contents and with chemically or enzymatically degradable bonds, other biodegradable nonpeptidic polyamides, amino acid polymers, polyanhydride drug carriers such as, but not limited to, poly(sebacic acid) (PSA); aliphatic-aromatic homopolymers, and poly(anhydride-co-imides), poly(phosphoesters) by matrix or pendant delivery systems, poly(phosphazenes), poly(iminocarbonate), crosslinked poly(ortho ester), hydroxylated polyester-urethanes, or the like.
Biodegradable adhesives, according to the invention, thus include, without limitation, poly(glycerol-co-sebacate acrylate) (PGSA), poly(L-glutamic acid)-based compositions, poly(γ-glutamic acid)-based compositions, poly(alkyl cyano acrylate)-based compositions, polyacrylic acid-based compositions, including polyacrylic acid crosslinked with pentaerythritol and/or allyl sucrose, polyacrylic acid crosslinked with divinyl glycol, and combinations thereof; fibrin-based compositions, collagen-based compositions, including collagen/poly(L-glutamic acid) compositions; albumin-based compositions, including BioGlue® (comprises purified bovine serum albumin (BSA) and glutaraldehyde); cyanoacrylate compositions, including butyl-2-cyanoacrylate adhesives (e.g., Indermil®, Histoacryl®, Histoacryl® Blue, and LiquiBand®) and octyl-2-cyanoacrylate adhesives (e.g., Dermabond®, SurgiSeal™, LiquiBand® Flex, and OctylSeal); polyethylene glycol) (PEG) based compositions, including FocalSeal®, Progel™, Duraseal™, DuraSeal™ Xact, Coseal® and ReSure Sealant; polysaccharide-based compositions, polypeptide-based compositions, and combinations thereof.
The term “osteogenic composition”; as used herein, means and includes an agent or composition that induces or modulates an osteogenic physiological or biological process, or cellular activity, e.g., induces proliferation, and/or growth and/or remodeling and/or regeneration of bone or osseous tissue.
The term “osteogenic composition” thus means and includes, without limitation, the following osteogenic materials and compositions comprising same: demineralized bone matrix, autograft bone material, allograft bone material, xenograft bone material, polymethyl-methacrylate, calcium-based bone void filler material, including hydroxyapatite (HA) and tricalcium phosphate; and combinations or mixtures thereof.
The term “osteogenic composition” also means and includes, without limitation, the following polymer materials and compositions comprising same: poly(glycerol sebacate) (PGS), poly(glycerol-co-sebacate) acrylate (PGSA) and co-polymers, such as poly(glycerol sebacate)-co-poly(ethylene glycol) (PGS-PEG); and/or composites thereof, e.g., PGS-hydroxyapatite (HA) composites and PGS-poly(ε-caprolactone) (PGS-PCL) composites.
The term “osteogenic composition” also means and includes, without limitation, acellular extracellular matrix (ECM) derived from mammalian tissue sources.
The term “osteogenic composition” thus means and includes, without limitation, acellular ECM derived from bone or osseous tissue, small intestine submucosa (SIS), epithelium of mesodermal origin, i.e., mesothelial tissue, placental tissue, omentum tissue, and combinations thereof.
The terms “biologically active agent” and “biologically active composition” are used interchangeably herein, and mean and include agent or composition that induces or modulates a physiological or biological process, or cellular activity, e.g., induces proliferation, and/or growth and/or regeneration of tissue, including osseous tissue.
The terms “biologically active agent” and “biologically active composition”, as used herein, thus include agents and compositions that can be varied in kind or amount to provide a therapeutic level effective to mediate the formation or healing of osseous tissue, cartilage and connective tissue, e.g., tendons and ligaments. The term “biologically active composition”, in some instances, thus means and includes an “osteogenic composition.”
The terms “biologically active agent” and “biologically active composition” thus mean and include, without limitation, the following bone morphogenic proteins (BMPs) and compositions comprising same: BMP-1, BMP2a, BMP2b, BMP3, BMP4, BMP5, BMP6, BMP7 (also referred to as osteogenic protein 1 (OP-1)) and BMP8a.
The terms “biologically active agent” and “biologically active composition” also mean and include, without limitation, the following biological agents and compositions comprising same: platelet derived growth factor (PDGF), an insulin-like growth factor (IGF), including IGF-1 and IGF-2; basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF) (also referred to as FGF2), transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β), including, TGF-β1 and TGF-β2; a growth hormone (GH), parathyroid hormone (PTH, including PTH1-34), transforming growth factor-α (TGF-α), granulocyte/macrophage colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF), epidermal growth factor (EGF), growth and differentiation factor-5 (GDF-5), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), angiogenin, angiopoietin-1, del-1, follistatin, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF), hepatocyte growth factor/scatter factor (HGF/SF), interleukin-8 (IL-8), interleukin-10 (IL-10), leptin, midkine, placental growth factor, platelet-derived endothelial cell growth factor (PD-ECGF), platelet-derived growth factor-BB (PDGF-BB), pleiotrophin (PTN), progranulin, proliferin, a matrix metalloproteinase (MMP), angiopoietin 1 (ang1), angiopoietin 2 (ang2) and delta-like ligand 4 (DLL4).
The terms “biologically active agent” and “biologically active composition” also mean and include, without limitation, the following cells and compositions comprising same: bone marrow-derived progenitor cells, bone marrow stromal cells (BMSCs), osteoprogenitor cells, osteoblasts, osteocytes, osteoclasts, committed or partially committed cells from the osteogenic or chondrogenic lineage, hematopoietic stem cells, chondrocytes, chondrogenic progenitor cells (CPCs), mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) and embryonic stem cells.
The terms “biologically active agent” and “biologically active composition” also mean and include an “extracellular vesicle (EV)”, “exosome” “microsome” or “micro-vesicle”, which are used interchangeably herein, and mean and include a biological structure formed from a hydrocarbon monolayer or bilayer configured to contain or encase a composition of matter.
The terms “extracellular vesicle (EV)”, “exosome”, “microsome” and “micro-vesicle” thus include, without limitation, a biological structure formed from a lipid layer configured to contain or encase biologically active agents and/or combinations thereof.
The terms “extracellular vesicle (EV)”, “exosome”, “microsome” and “micro-vesicle” also include, without limitation, EVs derived from the aforementioned cells and compositions comprising same, e.g., BMSC-derived EVs.
The terms “pharmacological agent” and “active agent” are used interchangeably herein, and mean and include an agent, drug, compound, composition or mixture thereof, including its formulation, which provides some therapeutic, often beneficial, effect. This includes any physiologically or pharmacologically active substance (or composition comprising same) that produces a localized or systemic effect or effects in animals, including warm blooded mammals.
The terms “pharmacological agent” and “active agent” thus mean and include, without limitation, the following osteoinductive agents and compositions comprising same: icaritin, tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) inhibitors, including etanercept and infliximab, disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs), including methotrexate and hydroxychloroquine, antibiotics, anti-viral agents, steroidal anti-inflammatories, non-steroidal anti-inflammatories, anti-thrombotic agents, including anti-coagulants and anti-platelet agents, and vasodilating agents.
The terms “pharmacological agent” and “active agent” further mean and include, without limitation, the following bisphosphonate agents and compositions comprising same: risedronate (Actonel®), alendronate (Fosamax®), ibandronate (Boniva®), zoledronic acid (Reclast®), pamidronate (Aredia®) and etidronate (Didronel®).
The terms “pharmacological agent” and “active agent” further mean and include, without limitation, the following antibiotics and compositions comprising same: penicillin, carboxypenicillins, such as ticarcillin; tetracyclines, such as minocycline; gentamicin, vancomycin, ciprofloxacin, amikacin, aminoglycosides, cephalosporins, clindamycin, erythromycin, fluoroquinolones, macrolides, azolides, metronidazole, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, polymyxin B, oxytetracycline, tobramycin, cefazolin and rifampin.
The terms “anti-inflammatory” and “anti-inflammatory agent” are also used interchangeably herein, and mean and include a “pharmacological agent”, which, when a therapeutically effective amount is administered to a subject, prevents or treats bodily tissue inflammation, i.e., the protective tissue response to injury or destruction of tissues, which serves to destroy, dilute, or wall off both the injurious agent and the injured tissues.
Anti-inflammatory agents thus include, without limitation, dexamethasone, betamethasone, prednisone, prednisolone, methylprednisolone sodium succinate, methylprednisolone, cortisone, ketorolac, diclofenac and ibuprofen.
The terms “pharmacological agent” and “active agent” further mean and include, without limitation, the following metal-based antimicrobials and compositions comprising same: silver particles, copper particles, cobalt particles, nickel particles, zinc particles, zirconium particles, molybdenum particles, lead particles and mixtures thereof.
As indicated above, the term “pharmacological composition”, as used herein, means and includes a composition comprising a “pharmacological agent” and “active agent”.
The term “therapeutically effective”, as used herein, means that the amount of the “pharmacological agent” and/or “pharmacological composition” and/or “biologically active agent” and/or “biologically active composition” administered is of sufficient quantity to ameliorate one or more causes, symptoms, or sequelae of a disease or disorder. Such amelioration only requires a reduction or alteration, not necessarily elimination, of the cause, symptom, or sequelae of a disease or disorder.
The terms “patient” and “subject” are used interchangeably herein, and mean and include warm blooded mammals, humans and primates; avians; domestic household or farm animals, such as cats, dogs, sheep, goats, cattle, horses and pigs; laboratory animals, such as mice, rats and guinea pigs; fish; reptiles; zoo and wild animals; and the like.
The terms “one embodiment”, “one aspect”, and “an embodiment” and “an aspect”, as used herein, means that a particular feature, structure, or characteristic described in connection with the embodiment may be included in at least one embodiment and not that any particular embodiment is required to have a particular feature, structure or characteristic described herein unless set forth in the claim.
The phrase “in one embodiment” or similar phrases employed herein do not limit the inclusion of a particular element of the invention to a single embodiment. The element may thus be included in other, or all embodiments discussed herein.
The term “substantially”, as used herein, means and includes the complete or nearly complete extent or degree of an action, characteristic, property, state, structure, item, or result to function as indicated. For example, an object that is “substantially” enclosed would mean that the object is either completely enclosed or nearly completely enclosed. The exact allowable degree of deviation from absolute completeness may in some cases depend on the specific context, such that enclosing nearly all the length of a lumen would be substantially enclosed, even if the distal end of the structure enclosing the lumen had a slit or channel formed along a portion thereof.
Use of the term “substantially” is equally applicable when used in a negative connotation to refer to the complete or near complete lack of an action, characteristic, property, state, structure, item, or result. For example, structure which is “substantially free of” a bottom would either completely lack a bottom or so nearly completely lack a bottom that the effect would be effectively the same as if it completely lacked a bottom.
The term “comprise” and variations of the term, such as “comprising” and “comprises,” means “including, but not limited to” and is not intended to exclude, for example, other components, elements or steps.
The following disclosure is provided to further explain in an enabling fashion the best modes of performing one or more embodiments of the present invention. The disclosure is further offered to enhance the understanding and appreciation for the inventive principles and advantages thereof, rather than to limit in any manner the invention. The invention is defined solely by the appended claims, including any amendments made during the pendency of this application, and all equivalents of those claims as issued.
As indicated above, the present invention is directed to minimally-invasive methods, systems and apparatus for stabilizing dysfunctional SI joints.
In some embodiments of the invention, there are thus provided minimally-invasive systems for stabilizing dysfunctional SI joints. As indicated above, in a preferred embodiment, the minimally-invasive systems (also referred to herein as “minimally-invasive SI joint stabilization systems”) can be readily employed in minimally-invasive methods or procedures to stabilize dysfunctional SI joints via a posterior approach.
As indicated above, SI joint stabilization, including minimally-invasive SI joint stabilization, typically comprises surgical placement of a prosthesis proximate to or in a dysfunctional SI joint via anterior, lateral and posterior approaches to the SI joint.
From the perspective of
Referring now to
Referring now to
As indicated above, a major disadvantage associated with many conventional anterior or lateral approaches to a dysfunctional SI joint is that muscles and ligaments are typically disrupted and often damaged. Nerves and blood vessels are also susceptible to damage during such SI joint stabilization methods.
In contrast, a posterior approach to a dysfunctional SI joint is much less invasive. Indeed, less tissue and fewer muscles are disrupted, and nerves and large blood vessels are avoided.
As indicated above, in a preferred embodiment of the invention, the system for stabilizing a dysfunctional SI joint comprises a tool assembly and a prosthesis.
Referring now to
Referring first to
As further illustrated in
Referring now to
As illustrated in
As further illustrated in
The defect creation assembly 30 further comprises a bone dislodging apparatus or system 40 disposed on the defect creation assembly distal end 36, which is configured and adapted to dislodge portions of osseous tissue, i.e., bone, proximate and in the dysfunctional SI joint.
As set forth in Co-pending U.S. application Ser. No. 17/463,831, the bone dislodging system 40 can comprise various bone dislodging apparatus, such as a drill assembly and associated drill bit or orthopedic burr, which can be operated manually, pneumatically, or electromechanically. In a preferred embodiment, the bone dislodging system 40 comprises a drill assembly and associated drill bit.
As shown in greater detail in
As indicated above, the defect creation assemblies of the invention, including defect creation assembly 30, are preferably configured and adapted to create pilot SI joint openings in SI joint bone structures to accommodate placement of a prosthesis of the invention therein.
As also set forth in Co-pending U.S. application Ser. No. 17/463,831, the defect creation assemblies of the invention, including defect creation assembly 30, are configured and adapted to create pilot SI joint openings in SI joint bone structures of various sizes and configurations. Illustrative are the pilot SI joint openings depicted in FIGS. 11C-11E of Co-pending priority U.S. application Ser. No. 13/857,977.
Referring no w to
As illustrated in
As further illustrated in
As additionally illustrated in
The three-dimensional pilot SI joint opening 100, i.e., cross-sectional shape thereof, also defines a cross-sectional area of the three-dimensional pilot SI joint opening cross-sectional shape (denoted “A2i-1”)
The three-dimensional pilot SI joint opening 100, i.e., cross-sectional shape thereof, also comprises a longitudinal axis (denoted “LA2”) in the plane that intersects the sacrum 2 and ilium 4 and an initial pilot SI joint opening length along the axis LA2.
Referring now to
As illustrated in
As set forth in Co-pending U.S. application Ser. No. 17/463,831, the sacrum and ilium guide portions 203, 204 can comprise various configurations, e.g., cross-sectional shapes, and sizes to, as discussed in detail below, accommodate insertion of defined regions of a prosthesis of the invention therein and transition of the sacrum and ilium guide portions 203, 204 from pilot or first configurations and sizes to expanded second configurations and sizes when the prosthesis is inserted therein.
The sacrum and ilium guide portions 203, 204 can also be disposed at various locations in the sacrum 2 and ilium 4, such as shown in
As illustrated in
As further illustrated in
The sacrum and ilium guide portions 203, 204 of the pilot SI joint opening 200 are also preferably disposed on a plane that similarly intersects the sacrum 2 and ilium 4.
Referring no w to
As also set forth in Co-pending U.S. application Ser. No. 17/463,831, the prosthesis deployment assembly 50 comprises prosthesis engagement means configured and adapted to connect the prosthesis deployment assembly 50 to prostheses of the invention (prosthesis 70 shown in
As illustrated in
As further illustrated in
As illustrated in
As illustrated in
Referring now to
As further illustrated in
Referring back to
According to the invention, the system for stabilizing dysfunctional SI joints can comprise various prostheses, which are configured and adapted to be inserted into pilot SI joint openings created by a defect creation assembly of the invention.
Suitable prostheses that are configured and adapted to be inserted info a pilot SI joint opening created by a defect creation assembly are set forth, in Co-pending priority application Ser. No. 13/857,977.
As set forth in Co-pending U.S. application Ser. No. 17/463,831, the prostheses illustrated in FIGS. 12A-12C, 13A-13B, 14A-14C and 15A-15D of Co-pending priority application Ser. No. 13/857,977 are suitable for insertion into pilot SI joint openings 100, 200 described above, and into and through articular cartilage and cortical bone (and trabecular bone), which define a SI joint.
Referring now to
As illustrated in
As further illustrated in
As set forth in Co-pending U.S. application Ser. No. 17/463,831, the prosthesis 70 can comprise any suitable length from the proximal ends 79a to the distal ends 79b of the partially cylindrical sections 76a, 76b. In some embodiments, the prosthesis 70 comprises a length in the range of 20-50 mm, more preferably, a length in the range of 30-40 mm.
As illustrated in
The second partially cylindrical surface region 77b similarly preferably comprises a partially cylindrical surface region shape that corresponds to at least a portion of the first lobe region 103 of the pilot SI joint opening 100 and/or the sacrum guide portion 203 of the pilot SI joint opening 200, or the second lobe region 104 of the pilot SI joint opening 100 and/or the ilium guide portion 204 of the pilot SI joint opening 200, again depending on the entry position of the prosthesis 70 into the pilot SI joint openings 100, 200.
As illustrated in
As also set forth in Co-pending U.S. application Ser. No. 17/463,831, the taper region 82 of the bridge section 78 can comprise various configurations including, without limitation, X-bevel, wedge-shaped or bevel, including top and bottom wedge bevels, Y-bevel, including top and bottom Y-bevels, and K-bevel configurations.
In some embodiments, the taper region 82 comprises two angled regions that intersect at a central point 83, i.e., pointed proximate the mid-region of the bridge section 78, such as shown in
As further illustrated in
As illustrated in
As illustrated in
In a preferred embodiment, the internal prosthesis engagement member lumens 86a, 86b of the prosthesis 70 are sized and configured to receive the prosthesis guide pin 56 of the prosthesis deployment assembly 50 and, as discussed below, the prosthesis engagement rod 60 of the prosthesis deployment assembly 50.
As set forth in Co-pending U.S. application Ser. No. 17/463,831 and illustrated in
In a preferred embodiment, the internal prosthesis engagement lumens 86a, 86b are also configured to receive agents and compositions that further facilitate adhesion of the prosthesis 70 to the pilot SI openings 100, 200 of the invention and, thereby, sacrum and/or ilium bone structures, and the aforementioned biologically active agents and compositions, including osteogenic agents and compositions, and pharmacological agents and compositions that facilitate osseous or bone tissue ingrowth into the prosthesis 70 and healing of the SI joint bone structures.
Referring back to
In a preferred embodiment, the agents and compositions referenced above are adapted to extrude through the slots 90 and holes 92 of the prosthesis 70 when the prosthesis 70 is inserted in a pilot SI joint opening (i.e., pilot SI joint openings 100 or 200), to, as indicated above, (i) further facilitate adhesion of the prosthesis 70 to the pilot SI openings 100, 200 of the invention and, thereby, sacrum and/or ilium, and (ii) facilitate osseous or bone tissue ingrowth into the prosthesis 70 and healing of the SI joint bone structures.
Referring now to
According to one embodiment, the length of the prosthesis cross-sectional shape PCCS along longitudinal axis LA3 is greater than the length of the pilot SI joint opening 100, i.e., cross-sectional shape thereof illustrated in
As illustrated in
As further illustrated in
As set forth in Co-pending U.S. application Ser. No. 17/463,831, when the prosthesis 70 is inserted into pilot SI joint opening 200, as illustrated in
As further illustrated in
As illustrated in
In a preferred embodiment, to achieve sufficient expansion of the pilot SI joint openings 100, 200 when the prosthesis 70 is inserted therein, preferably, the cross-sectional areas of the regions defined by the first and second elongated partially cylindrical sections 76a, 76b of the prosthesis 70 are at least 0.05% greater than the cross-sectional areas defined by the first and second lobe regions 103, 104 of the pilot SI joint opening 100, and the cross-sectional areas defined by the sacrum and ilium guide portions 203, 204 of pilot SI joint opening 200.
In some embodiments, the cross-sectional areas of the regions defined by the first and second elongated partially cylindrical sections 76a, 76b of the prosthesis 70 are substantially equal to or slightly smaller, e.g., ≤0.05%, than the cross-sectional areas defined by the first and second lobe regions 103, 104 of the pilot SI joint opening 100, and the cross-sectional areas defined by the sacrum and ilium guide portions 203, 204 of pilot SI joint opening 200.
As also set forth in Co-pending U.S. application Ser. No. 17/463,831, the prosthesis 70, as well as the prostheses disclosed in Co-pending priority application Ser. No. 13/857,977, can comprise various biocompatible materials, including metals and metal alloys, such as titanium, stainless-steel, cobalt-chromium alloys and nickel-titanium alloys.
The prosthesis 70, as well as the prostheses disclosed in Co-pending application Ser. No. 13/857,977, can also comprise various biocompatible polymers, including, without limitation, reinforced polymers, such as carbon fiber reinforced polymers and metal-framed polymers.
The prosthesis 70, as well as the prostheses disclosed in Co-pending priority application Ser. No. 13/857,977, can also comprise a porous structure to facilitate (i) adhesion of the prosthesis 70 to a post-prosthesis insertion SI joint opening of the invention; particularly, post-prosthesis insertion SI joint openings 300, 400 and, thereby, to SI joint bone structures, i.e., sacrum and ilium bone structures, and (ii) bone or osseous tissue ingrowth into the prosthesis 70.
The prosthesis 70, as well as the prostheses disclosed in Co-pending priority application. Ser. No. 13/857,977, can further comprise various exterior surface textures and roughness to facilitate or enhance engagement of the prosthesis to a post-prosthesis insertion SI joint opening, such as post-prosthesis insertion SI joint openings 300, 400, and, thereby, to SI joint bone structures, i.e., sacrum and ilium bone structures, and/or maintain engagement thereto and positioning therein. The surface of the prosthesis 70 (as well as the prostheses disclosed in Co-pending priority application Ser. No. 13/857,977) can, thus, comprise a roughness grade number of N1 (Ra=˜0.025 μm), N2 (Ra=˜0.05 μm), M3 (Ra=˜0.1 μm), N4 (Ra=˜0.2 μm), N5 (Ra=˜0.4 μm), N6 (Ra=˜0.08 μm), N7 (Ra=˜1.6 μm), N8 (Ra=˜3.2 μm), N9 (Ra=˜6.3 μm), N10 (Ra=˜12.5 μm), N11 (Ra=˜25 μm) or N12 (Ra=˜50 μm).
In some embodiments, the prosthesis 70, as well as the prostheses disclosed in Co-pending priority application Ser. No. 13/857,977, further comprise an outer coating.
In some embodiments, the outer coating comprises a biocompatible and, preferably, biodegradable adhesive composition. According to the invention, suitable adhesive compositions include, without limitation, poly(L-glutamic acid)-based compositions, poly(γ-glutamic acid)-based compositions, poly(alkyl cyano acrylate)-based compositions, polyacrylic acid-based compositions, including polyacrylic acid crosslinked with pentaerythritol and/or allyl sucrose, polyacrylic acid crosslinked with divinyl glycol and combinations thereof; fibrin-based compositions, collagen-based compositions, including collagen and poly(L-glutamic acid) compositions; albumin-based compositions, including BioGlue® (comprises purified bovine serum albumin (BSA) and glutaraldehyde); cyanoacrylate compositions, including butyl-2-cyanoacrylate adhesives (e.g., Indermil®, Histoacryl®, Histoacryl® Blue, and LiquiBand®) and octyl-2-cyanoacrylate adhesives (e.g., Dermabond®, SurgiSeal™, LiquiBand® Flex, and OctylSeal); polyethylene glycol) (PEG) based compositions, including FocalSeal®, Progel™, Duraseal™, DuraSeal™ Xact, Coseal® and ReSure Sealant, polysaccharide-based compositions, polypeptide-based compositions, and radiation curable materials, such as poly(glycerol-co-sebacate) acrylate (PGSA), discussed below.
In some embodiments, the outer coating comprises a biologically active composition comprising one of the aforementioned biologically active agents or a pharmacological composition comprising one of the forementioned pharmacological agents.
In some embodiments, the outer coating comprises one of the aforementioned polymers and/or compositions comprising same.
In some embodiments, the aforementioned polymer compositions comprise one or more of the aforementioned biologically active agents or pharmacological agents.
In some embodiments of the invention, the polymer comprises poly(glycerol sebacate) (PGS) or a derivative thereof, including, without limitation, poly(glycerol-co-sebacate) acrylate (PGSA) and PGS co-polymers, such as poly(glycerol sebacate)-co-poly(ethylene glycol) (PGS-PEG); and/or composites thereof, e.g., PGS-hydroxyapatite (HA) composites and PGS-poly(ε-caprolactone) (PGS-PCL) composites, and compositions comprising same.
As set forth in Co-pending U.S. application Ser. No. 17/463,831, PGS and derivatives thereof possess a unique property of inducing remodeling of damaged osseous or bone tissue, such as at pilot SI joint openings, and, hence, healing of the associated bone structures when disposed proximate thereto.
As set forth in Loh, et al., Poly(glycerol sebacate) Biomaterial: Synthesis and Biomedical Applications, Journal of Materials Chemistry B, vol. 3(39), pp. 7641-7652 (2015) and indicated in Table 1 below, a further seminal property of PGS is that its physical state can be modulated during synthesis by controlling the “degree of esterification” via at least one crosslinking agent, e.g., methylene diphenyl diisocyanate (MDI).
As set forth in Co-pending U.S. application. Ser. No. 17/463,831, any suitable degree of esterification of PGS can be employed for PGS when employed in or for PGS based outer coatings (I.e., polymer compositions comprising PGS) and biologically active agent compositions of the invention.
In some embodiments, the PGS based outer coatings comprise a degree of esterification in the range of ˜76%-83%, whereby the PGS exhibits adhesive properties, which will enhance engagement of prosthesis 70 (as well as the prostheses disclosed in Co-pending priority application Ser. No. 13/857,977) to the post-prosthesis insertion SI joint openings 300, 400 and, thereby, to the SI joint bone structures, i.e., sacrum and ilium bone structures.
As is well established, the physical state of poly(glycerol-co-sebacate) acrylate (PGSA) can also be modulated by combining the PGSA with a suitable photoinitiator and subjecting the PGS A to radiation.
Indeed, as set forth in Nijst, et al., Synthesis and Characterization of Photocurable Elastomers from Poly(Glycerol-Co-Sebacate), Biomacromolecules, vol. 8, no. 10, pp. 3067-3073 (2007), PGSA can be induced to transition from a liquid or flowable state to a solid elastomer state when combined with a photoinitiator, such as 2-hydroxy-1-[4-hydroxyethoxy) phenyl]-2-methyl-1-propanone (D 2959, Ciba Geigy), 2,2-dimethoxy-2-phenylacetophenone, titanocenes, fluorinated diaryltitanocenes, iron arene complexes, manganese decacarbonyl and methylcyclopentadienyl manganese tricarbonyl, and subjected to radiation, such as visible light; particularly, radiation in the range of approximately 380-750 nm, and ultraviolet (UV) light, particularly, radiation in the range of 10-400 nm.
Thus, in some embodiments, a composition comprising PGSA (also referred to herein as a “PGSA based composition” and “fixation composition”) is employed to enhance the engagement of the prosthesis 70 to a post-prosthesis insertion SI joint opening, such as post-prosthesis insertion SI joint openings 300, 400, and, thereby, SI joint bone structures, i.e., sacrum and ilium bone structures.
In such embodiments, the PGSA based composition (in a flowable state) is disposed in the internal prosthesis engagement member lumens 86a, 86b of the prosthesis 70, whereby the PGSA based composition is dispersed when the prosthesis 70 is positioned in the dysfunctional SI joint and fills any gaps between the prosthesis 70 and a post-prosthesis insertion SI joint opening of the invention; particularly, post-prosthesis insertion SI joint openings 300, 400, and thereafter cured via radiation and solidified, whereby the solidified PGSA enhances the engagement of the prosthesis 70 to the post-prosthesis insertion SI joint opening and, thereby, to the sacrum and ilium bone structures.
According to the invention, the PGSA fixation concept described above can also be readily employed in other prostheses configured and/or adapted to stabilize bone structures and joints defined thereby, including and in addition to sacrum and ilium bone structures and SI joints defined thereby, e.g., vertebral bone structures and vertebral joints defined thereby, and tarsal bone structures and tarsal joints (e.g., tarsometatarsal joints, intermetatarsal joints and metatarsophalangeal joints) defined thereby, which comprise at least one internal cavity configured to receive a fixation composition of the invention therein and means for dispersing the fixation composition into one or more gaps or cavities between an exterior region of the prostheses and an adjoining surface of a bone structure when the prostheses are inserted therein. By way of example, such prostheses can comprise a simple pin structure with an internal lumen configured to receive a fixation composition of the invention therein and a plurality of slots that extend through the pin structure and are in communication with the internal lumen to facilitate dispersal of the fixation composition out of the pin structure and into one or more gaps between an exterior region of the pin structure and an adjoining surface of a bone structure when the pin structure is inserted therein.
PGS and its derivatives; particularly, PGSA are also excellent platforms for delivery and, hence, administration of biologically active agents and pharmacological agents to mammalian tissue, including osseous or bone tissue.
Thus, in some embodiments of the invention, the PGS based outer coatings and PGS and PGS A based compositions further comprise one or more of the aforementioned biologically active or pharmacological agents.
In some embodiments, the system for stabilizing dysfunctional SI joints further comprises an image capture apparatus configured and adapted to capture images reflecting positions and/or orientations of the elongated guide probe and/or defect creation assembly when disposed in the body, and, particularly, during advancement of the elongated guide probe and defect creation assembly toward and into the dysfunctional SI joint.
As set forth in Co-pending U.S. application Ser. No. 17/463,831, suitable image capture apparatus comprise a fluoroscope, a CT system, an ultrasound system, a radiography system, and a magnetic resonance imaging system.
In some embodiments, the system for stabilizing dysfunctional SI joints further comprises a drill guide assembly that facilitates proper placement of (i) the elongated guide probe 20 in the dysfunctional SI joint, and (ii) the pilot SI joint openings 100, 200 of tire invention and, hence, sacrum and ilium portions thereof, and, thereby, placement of the prosthesis 70 (and other prostheses described in Co-pending U.S. application Ser. No. 13/857,977) in the dysfunctional SI joint.
Referring now to
As illustrated in
Referring now to
As illustrated in
As illustrated in
As further illustrated in
In a preferred embodiment, as additionally shown in
Referring now to
As illustrated in
As further illustrated in
Referring now to
As illustrated in
As illustrated in
In a preferred embodiment, the drill guide medial lumen 526 is sized and configured to receive and guide the elongated guide probe 20 of the invention to a desired position proximate the dysfunctional SI joint.
The drill guide internal lumens 524a, 524b and drill guide medial lumen 526 can also be sized and configured to receive various other suitable instruments, such as surgical scopes, center punches, location pins, drill probes and drill stop assemblies, to facilitate the creation of a pilot SI joint opening.
Referring back to
Referring now to
As illustrated in
In some embodiments, the system for stabilizing dysfunctional SI joints further comprises a prosthesis extraction assembly 600 that is configured and adapted to remove the prosthesis 70 from the expanded post-prosthesis insertion SI joint opening and, thereby, dysfunctional SI joint.
Referring now to
As illustrated in
As illustrated in
As illustrated in
As illustrated in
As further illustrated in
As illustrated in
As illustrated in
As further illustrated in
As illustrated in
In a preferred embodiment, the weighted sleeve member 626 is configured to slidably translate along the elongated rod member 621 and abut the proximal end 614a of the extraction fork 610 and bump stop 628 when the slap hammer assembly 620 is releasably engaged to the extraction fork 610.
According to the invention, removal of prosthesis 70 from the expanded post-prosthesis insertion SI joint opening is achieved as follows:
The following example is provided to enable those skilled in the art to more clearly understand and practice the present invention. The example should not be considered as limiting the scope of the invention, but merely as being illustrated as representative thereof.
An adult male, age 42 presented with a traumatic injury proximate the SI joint, resulting in a dysfunctional SI joint and significant pain associated therewith, i.e., a visual analog pain score (VAS) of approximately 8.0.
A CT scan was initially performed to determine the full extent of the patient's injury, check for any SI joint abnormalities and plan the stabilization procedure, including the prosthesis required to stabilize the dysfunctional SI joint.
The stabilization procedure was performed in accord with the method set forth in Co-pending U.S. application Ser. No. 17/463,779; specifically, ¶¶[000258]-[000261] thereof. The specifics of the procedure were as follows:
Prosthesis
The prosthesis selected for the procedure was similar to prosthesis 70 illustrated in
The prosthesis included a bone graft material, which was placed in the barrels of the prosthesis after the prosthesis was implanted in the dysfunctional SI joint.
Posterior Inferior Surgical Approach
The initial incision was placed along the lateral lip of the posterior third of the iliac crest to the posterior superior spine, which provided a prosthesis entry point into the dysfunctional SI joint through the posterior ligaments at approximately the S3 level. The trajectory of the prosthesis was toward the mid-point of the S1 end plate and the sacral promontory.
Creation of Pilot SI Joint Opening
The pilot SI joint opening was created with the defect creation assembly shown in
The pilot SI joint opening was similar to pilot SI joint opening 200 described above. The pilot SI joint opening was created by drilling a first opening in the sacrum bone structure and a second opening in the ilium bone structure (such as shown in
Radiological Assessment
CT scan images of the patient's SI joint six (6) months after the SI joint stabilization procedure, which are shown in
Post-Procedure SI Joint Pain Relief and Function
After a recovery period of fourteen (14) days, tire patient reported that the pain had been substantially reduced. Indeed, as shown in
The patient was also subjected to a series of post procedure tests to determine the stability of the SI joint and mobility of the musculoskeletal structures of the pelvic and lumbar regions proximate the SI joint. The results were very favorable. The patient tested positive to the flexion abduction and external rotation (FABER) test. The patient also responded very favorably to Gaenslen, thigh thrust, compression and distraction tests.
The tests thus confirmed that the post procedure SI joint was stabilized and that the musculoskeletal structures of the pelvic and lumbar regions proximate thereto were restored to a near normal level.
As will readily be appreciated by one having ordinary skill in the art, the present invention provides numerous advantages compared to prior art methods and apparatus for stabilizing dysfunctional SI joints. Among the advantages are the following:
Without departing from the spirit and scope of this invention, one of ordinary skill can make various changes and modifications to the invention to adapt it to various usages and conditions. As such, these changes and modifications are properly, equitably, and intended to be, within the full range of equivalence of the following claims.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 17/463,831, filed Sep. 1, 2021, which is a continuation-in-part application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/857,977, filed Apr. 5, 2013, which is a continuation application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/192,289, filed Jul. 27, 2011, now abandoned, which claims the benefit of U.S. provisional patent application Ser. No. 61/368,233, filed Jul. 27, 2010.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4444181 | Wevers | Apr 1984 | A |
4501269 | Bagby | Feb 1985 | A |
4570623 | Ellison | Feb 1986 | A |
4714469 | Kenna | Dec 1987 | A |
4834757 | Brantigan | May 1989 | A |
4946378 | Hirayama | Aug 1990 | A |
5390683 | Pisharodi | Feb 1995 | A |
5397364 | Kozak | Mar 1995 | A |
5425772 | Brantigan | Jun 1995 | A |
5445639 | Kuslich | Aug 1995 | A |
5449359 | Groiso | Sep 1995 | A |
5454814 | Comte | Oct 1995 | A |
5458638 | Kuslich | Oct 1995 | A |
5522899 | Michelson | Jun 1996 | A |
5593409 | Michelson | Jan 1997 | A |
5609636 | Kohrs | Mar 1997 | A |
5669909 | Zdeblick | Sep 1997 | A |
5683394 | Rinner | Nov 1997 | A |
5888223 | Bray, Jr. | Mar 1999 | A |
5904719 | Errico | May 1999 | A |
5928239 | Mirza | Jul 1999 | A |
5968098 | Winslow | Oct 1999 | A |
6045579 | Hochshuler | Apr 2000 | A |
6053916 | Moore | Apr 2000 | A |
6096080 | Nicholson | Aug 2000 | A |
6123705 | Michelson | Sep 2000 | A |
6165219 | Kohrs | Dec 2000 | A |
6197037 | Hair | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6224631 | Kohrs | May 2001 | B1 |
6245072 | Zdeblick | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6371987 | Weiland | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6383221 | Scarborough | May 2002 | B1 |
6413278 | Marchosky | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6436139 | Shapiro | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6440170 | Jackson | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6497707 | Bowman | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6641613 | Sennett | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6666888 | Jackson | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6723126 | Berry | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6743256 | Mason | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6743257 | Castro | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6746451 | Middleton | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6761738 | Boyd | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6767367 | Michelson | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6800093 | Nicholson | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6835208 | Marchosky | Dec 2004 | B2 |
D503801 | Jackson | Apr 2005 | S |
6942698 | Jackson | Sep 2005 | B1 |
7201775 | Gorensek | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7235101 | Berry | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7326251 | McCombe | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7648509 | Stark | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7708761 | Petersen | May 2010 | B2 |
7749225 | Chappuis | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7794500 | Felix | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7837732 | Zucherman | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7846206 | Oglaza | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7914530 | Michelson | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7922765 | Reiley | Apr 2011 | B2 |
8021392 | Petersen | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8062294 | Reynolds | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8066773 | Muhanna | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8080046 | Suddaby | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8088163 | Kleiner | Jan 2012 | B1 |
8133283 | Wilson | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8143042 | Bettinger | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8157865 | Hochschuler | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8221428 | Trieu | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8226721 | Belliard | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8287572 | Bae | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8343189 | Assell | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8348950 | Assell | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8388667 | Reiley | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8414648 | Reiley | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8419722 | Richards | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8425570 | Reiley | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8444693 | Reiley | May 2013 | B2 |
8470004 | Reiley | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8491656 | Schoedinger, III | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8523945 | Wensel | Sep 2013 | B1 |
8551171 | Johnson | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8551175 | Wensel | Oct 2013 | B1 |
8617244 | Reichen | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8679123 | Kinmon | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8709042 | Greenhalgh | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8709045 | Folsom | Apr 2014 | B1 |
8721722 | Shah | May 2014 | B2 |
8740912 | Stark | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8790368 | Sullivan | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8808377 | Donner | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8852280 | Armstrong | Oct 2014 | B2 |
D717951 | Cheney | Nov 2014 | S |
8951254 | Mayer | Feb 2015 | B2 |
8961571 | Lee | Feb 2015 | B2 |
9005291 | Loebl | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9039768 | Voellmicke | May 2015 | B2 |
9107745 | Bouduban | Aug 2015 | B2 |
9125649 | Bruewer | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9186155 | Katzman | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9204973 | Aflatoon | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9254130 | Hollis | Feb 2016 | B2 |
9333090 | Donner | May 2016 | B2 |
9359472 | Nicholson | Jun 2016 | B2 |
9408711 | Burkinshaw | Aug 2016 | B2 |
9480511 | Butters | Nov 2016 | B2 |
9566103 | Mayer | Feb 2017 | B2 |
9585756 | Mayer | Mar 2017 | B2 |
9592131 | Sandstrom | Mar 2017 | B2 |
9610172 | Butler | Apr 2017 | B2 |
9615856 | Arnett | Apr 2017 | B2 |
9724447 | Karp | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9826986 | Donner | Nov 2017 | B2 |
9888911 | Siegal | Feb 2018 | B2 |
10166022 | Early | Jan 2019 | B2 |
10182921 | Georges | Jan 2019 | B2 |
10201427 | Mauldin | Feb 2019 | B2 |
10238382 | Terrill | Mar 2019 | B2 |
10278742 | Pavlov | May 2019 | B2 |
10285689 | Finley | May 2019 | B2 |
10292825 | Kahmer | May 2019 | B2 |
10376367 | Fallin | Aug 2019 | B2 |
10376379 | Songer | Aug 2019 | B2 |
10383733 | Early | Aug 2019 | B2 |
10492841 | Hartdegen | Dec 2019 | B2 |
10512548 | Messerli | Dec 2019 | B2 |
10603055 | Donner | Mar 2020 | B2 |
D892331 | Hollis | Aug 2020 | S |
10729555 | Rappaport | Aug 2020 | B1 |
10779816 | Goldstein | Sep 2020 | B2 |
10918729 | Harris | Feb 2021 | B2 |
11006949 | Daniel | May 2021 | B2 |
11103239 | Isch | Aug 2021 | B2 |
11752011 | Stuart | Sep 2023 | B2 |
11866523 | Gabriele | Jan 2024 | B2 |
20010020186 | Boyce | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20020038123 | Visotsky | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20040193271 | Fraser | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040260286 | Ferree | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050149192 | Zucherman | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050222683 | Berry | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20060054171 | Dall | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060058802 | Kofoed | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060178745 | Bartish, Jr. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20070156241 | Reiley | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070239278 | Heinz | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070270879 | Isaza | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080140082 | Erdem | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080221623 | Gooch | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20090024174 | Stark | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090036927 | Vestgaarden | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090099602 | Aflatoon | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090138015 | Conner | May 2009 | A1 |
20090149884 | Snyder | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090254090 | Lizee | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090259261 | Reiley | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20100158978 | Markland | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100268228 | Petersen | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20110040362 | Godara | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110046737 | Teisen | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110098709 | Malandain | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110098816 | Jacob | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110098817 | Eckhardt | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110160866 | Laurence | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110184518 | Trieu | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110184520 | Trieu | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110230966 | Trieu | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110238181 | Trieu | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110295272 | Assell | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110301407 | Deitch | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120083883 | Ginn | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120116454 | Edidin | May 2012 | A1 |
20120130374 | Bouduban | May 2012 | A1 |
20120191191 | Trieu | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120215315 | Hochschuler | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120253406 | Bae | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120296428 | Donner | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120323285 | Assell | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120330420 | Brodke | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130030456 | Assell | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130053852 | Greenhalgh | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130053902 | Trudeau | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130085535 | Greenhalgh | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130172736 | Abdou | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130173004 | Greenhalgh | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130237988 | Mauldin | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130245764 | Mauldin | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130267836 | Mauldin | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130267961 | Mauldin | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130267989 | Mauldin | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130296953 | Mauldin | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20140066991 | Marik | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140088707 | Donner | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140135850 | Parent | May 2014 | A1 |
20140142700 | Donner | May 2014 | A1 |
20140200618 | Donner | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140207240 | Stoffman | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140277463 | Yerby | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20150173805 | Donner | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20160081810 | Reiley | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160100870 | Lavigne | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20170156879 | Janowski | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20190071537 | Pereira | Mar 2019 | A1 |
20210169660 | Reckling | Jun 2021 | A1 |
20210393408 | Ginn | Dec 2021 | A1 |
20210393409 | Ginn | Dec 2021 | A1 |
20220071644 | Donner | Mar 2022 | A1 |
20220273447 | Ginn | Sep 2022 | A1 |
20220273448 | Ginn | Sep 2022 | A1 |
20220296378 | Ginn | Sep 2022 | A1 |
20220304814 | Ginn | Sep 2022 | A1 |
20220346964 | Spenciner | Nov 2022 | A1 |
20230000631 | Ginn | Jan 2023 | A1 |
20230032203 | Maxwell | Feb 2023 | A1 |
20230255623 | Ritz | Aug 2023 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
WO-2010045749 | Apr 2010 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20210401581 A1 | Dec 2021 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61368233 | Jul 2010 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 17463831 | Sep 2021 | US |
Child | 17469132 | US | |
Parent | 13192289 | Jul 2011 | US |
Child | 13857977 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13857977 | Apr 2013 | US |
Child | 17463831 | US |