This instant specification relates to bicycle saddle clamps (or the like—unicycle, motorcycle, etc.). More specifically, this disclosure relates to mounting saddle rails to a seatpost/stanchion tube or simply a round tube.
In the search to save weight and simplify adjustment of the saddle position with respect to the seatpost, many different saddle clamp designs have been implemented in the past. Most modern saddle clamp designs use some sort of three-piece u-shaped head, one part of which is permanently attached to the top of the seatpost or integral as one piece with the seatpost. This increases manufacturing complexity and adds weight due to the interface being made more robust with more material. This fixed head design also has limitations. In the case of a dropper (height-adjustable) seatpost with this type of head, the stanchion tube cannot be withdrawn through the lower tube because the head is larger than the ID (inner diameter) of the lower tube. This prevents the assembly/disassembly of the stanchion through the bottom of the lower tube, requiring the stanchion to be inserted and removed from the top of the lower tube. This greatly constrains the architectural choices for the dropper mechanism inside the seatpost.
Another drawback to the fixed head type arrangement is that it lacks the ability to adjust the length of the stanchion tube by cutting from the same end as the clamp. Such adjustment becomes beneficial for shortening the overall length of the seatpost. In the case of a dropper seatpost, the lower end of the stanchion tube typically cannot be cut and since the head is permanently affixed, the upper end cannot be cut either. Therefore, to trim the length of a seatpost, the cut is made on the lower tube.
Yet another drawback to the fixed head type arrangement is that the only way to adjust the height of the seatpost is to make the adjustment at the post clamp, rather than the saddle clamp. This means that the entire seatpost is raised or lowered out of the frame in order to get the proper height adjustment. In the case of a dropper seatpost, it may be desirable to keep the lower tube as far in the frame as possible (to maximize the dropper travel) in order that the saddle can be lowered as far as possible. If one had to make the height adjustment by clamping the lower tube partly extended out of the frame, this reduces the amount the saddle can be ultimately lowered.
The present disclosure is generally related to a saddle clamp that can be removed from the stanchion tube for service of the post or trimming of the stanchion, is lighter weight, and/or is more adjustable. The systems and techniques described here may provide one or more of the following advantages:
1. Four degrees of adjustability (adds two extra degrees of adjustability over conventional saddle clamp designs—height and rotation):
2. Detachable (for service, adjustment, cleaning, and seatpost/stanchion trimming)
3. Fewer parts (symmetrical design may use only two unique parts—not including screws)
4. Light weight (fewer components and minimal material strategically placed for strength)
5. Tightening screws both secures saddle rails to clamp and clamp to seatpost/stanchion. May use only two screws resulting in a lighter weight. Further weight savings may be achieved using different materials (e.g., titanium hardware).
6. Extra-long support under the rail and maximized fore/aft adjustment (setback support)
7. Reference scale (markings on seatpost/stanchion)
8. Clamp adjustment away from stanchion tube (which may prevent accidental scratching of stanchion with tools such as a torque wrench or hex key)
9. Independent adjustment vs. tightening of hardware
The details of one or more implementations are set forth in the accompanying drawings and the description below. Other features and advantages will be apparent from the description and drawings.
In the following detailed description, reference is made to the accompanying drawings which form a part hereof, and in which is shown by way of illustration specific examples in which the disclosure may be practiced. It is to be understood that other examples may be utilized and structural or logical changes may be made without departing from the scope of the present disclosure.
Overall Assembly Composition
With reference, for example, to
Post Clamp Part Description
With reference, for example, to
With reference, for example, to
Within the post clamp wings 4 are post clamp slots 5 that receive the rail clamp shoulders 6 (described below). When the post clamps 1 are positioned against each other, the post clamp slots 5 of each post clamp 1 are primarily aligned across from each other. This allows the rail clamps 2 to be positioned perpendicular to the seat post/stanchion tube 11 (the maximum tilt adjustment angle). There can be variation in this design. The post clamp slots 5 do not have to be straight or perpendicular to the seat post/stanchion tube 11 axis—they can be a curved slot or angled slot. A curve or angled slot will affect the ratio of tilt to distance between the post clamps 1. Also, a perpendicular maximum tilt adjustment angle is not mandatory, and the post clamps 1 and post clamp slots 5 can be configured in such a way that the maximum tilt adjustment angle is more or less than perpendicular. In examples, the post clamp wings 4 are configured in such a way as to allow the post clamps 1 to nest/overlap within each other at the maximum tilt adjustment angle.
Rail Clamp Part Description
With reference, for example, to
Because the clamping force of the screw 3 is offset from the resulting clamping force on the saddle rail 9, a clamping moment exists. Therefore, in examples, the rail clamp 2 has a rail clamp foot 7. This rail clamp foot 7 provides a hard stop for the rail clamp 2 against the post clamp wing 4 and serves to counteract the tightening moment applied by the saddle rail 9 against the rail clamp 2. The rail clamp foot 7 reduces the bending moment acting upon the rail clamp shoulder 6 and screw 3.
In examples, the rail clamps 2 have a wide fore/aft setback support 8. This allows for maximum fore/aft position of the saddle rails 9 with respect to the saddle clamp/saddle clamp assembly 100. The wide support reduces the bending load on the saddle rails 9. Yet, the rail clamp fingers 12 on top of the rail clamp 2 are closer together. Close rail clamp fingers 12 allow the natural bend in the saddle rail 9 to be positioned closer to the midpoint of the saddle clamp 100. This, in turn, allows a greater adjustment difference between fore/aft position and more utilization of the straight portion of the saddle rail 9. As the saddle 10 is moved to the extreme fore or aft, the wide fore/aft setback support 8 ensures the saddle rail 9 is supported.
Assembly/Installation
With reference, for example, to
The area of the seat post in which the saddle clamp assembly 100 is installed may have markings that can be used for positional reference of the saddle clamp assembly 100 with respect to the seat post/stanchion tube 11. These markings may designate a clamp zone or a “keep out” zone. For example, if the saddle clamp assembly 100 is installed on a dropper seatpost stanchion tube 11, to prevent the saddle clamp 100 from crashing into the wiper seal or other seat post component when operated, the saddle clamp 100 should not be installed in the travel region of the stanchion tube 11. The markings may designate the safe region of the stanchion tube 11 in which the saddle clamp 100 can be installed without interference of the post operation.
To aid in assembly/disassembly, in examples, the rail clamp shoulders 6 are designed to be long enough to allow the screws 3 to be unscrewed and the rail clamps 2 to be drawn out enough to allow the insertion/removal of the saddle 10 into the saddle clamp assembly 100 without the screws 3 being completely removed or the rail clamp shoulder 6 coming out of the post clamp slot 5 (i.e., the saddle clamp assembly falling apart while working with it).
Also, to aid in assembly/disassembly, in examples, the post clamps 1 are designed such that they naturally clamp around the seat post with enough friction to hold position without tightening the screws 3, but still easy to move by hand. This allows for convenient and easy positioning of the saddle 10 and then tightening of the saddle 10 in place. The position of the saddle 10 is not affected by tightening of the screws 3 (unlike some traditional clamp designs). Therefore, it is possible to independently position the saddle 10 and, in a separate operation, tighten the saddle clamp assembly 100.
As the saddle clamp assembly 100 is secured by tightening the screws 3, the rail clamps 2 are drawn tight against the saddle rails 9. As the screws 3 continue to be tightened, the saddle rails 9 are drawn against the post clamp wings 4. This secures the saddle rail 9 between the rail clamp 2 and the post clamp 1. Because of friction, the saddle rails 9 cannot move along their axis (offset adjustment, explained later, is now fixed in position). Nor can the saddle 10 be moved laterally in the saddle clamp assembly 100.
As the screws 3 continue to be tightened, the tension force is transferred to the post clamp wings 4, drawing them toward each other. The post clamp wings 4 transfer the clamping force of the rail clamps 2 to a clamping force of the post clamp 1 around the seat post/stanchion tube 11. This secures the post clamp 1 to the seat post/stanchion tube 11. Friction between the post clamps 1 and the seat post/stanchion tube 11 holds the post clamps 1 in position and thus the rest of the saddle clamp assembly 100 is held in position.
Adjustment
When the screws 3 are loosened, the saddle clamp assembly 100 provides four degrees of adjustability: height, rotation, tilt, and offset. Most saddle clamps only allow for two degrees of adjustability: tilt and offset, with the other two degrees of adjustability handled at the post clamp on the bicycle frame. With the saddle clamp assembly 100, all four of these degrees of adjustability can be made at the saddle clamp assembly 100 itself.
With reference, for example, to
The ability to adjust the height of the saddle clamp 100 also allows for the ability to trim off the top of a seat post/stanchion tube 11. This can be a benefit in customizing fit and reducing weight of the seat post/stanchion tube 11. This may also reduce manufacturing costs since one size can be made to fit many.
With reference, for example, to
With reference, for example, to
With reference, for example, to
With reference, for example, to
With reference, for example, to
With reference, for example, to
With reference, for example, to
With reference, for example, to
With reference, for example, to
Other Features
In examples, the saddle clamp assembly 100 (including saddle clamp assembly 100-1, 100-2, 100-3, 100-4, 100-5, 100-6) has been designed to be lightweight. Material can be strategically eliminated to provide weight savings yet maintain the structural integrity of the saddle clamp assembly 100. More weight can be removed by machining away more material; however, this may increase the manufacturing complexity of the parts.
In examples, the saddle clamp 100 (including saddle clamp assembly 100-1, 100-2, 100-3, 100-4, 100-5, 100-6) has also been designed with consideration to the access of the screws 3 and proximity of the tools used to tighten the screws 3 with respect to the stanchion tube 11 of a dropper seatpost. Some conventional saddle clamp designs require tools (such as a torque wrench or hex key) to be brought very close to the stanchion tube 11 while tightening the clamp. This increases risk of scratching the stanchion tube 11 if a tool slips or is carelessly handled. A scratched stanchion tube 11 can cause a dropper seatpost to fail. With the saddle clamp 100, the tool approach is from the sides of the saddle clamp 100 such that the risk of scratching the stanchion tube 11 is minimized. It is also a more natural and ergonomic position to use a tool.
Although specific examples have been illustrated and described herein, it will be appreciated by those of ordinary skill in the art that a variety of alternate and/or equivalent implementations may be substituted for the specific examples shown and described without departing from the scope of the present disclosure. This application is intended to cover any adaptations or variations of the specific examples discussed herein.
This application claims priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119(e) to U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 62/651,379 filed on Apr. 2, 2018, and incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3496838 | Barrett et al. | Feb 1970 | A |
4155590 | Cunningham | May 1979 | A |
4773705 | Terranova | Sep 1988 | A |
4783119 | Moses | Nov 1988 | A |
5333826 | Lai | Aug 1994 | A |
5364160 | Fritschen et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5433504 | Kao | Jul 1995 | A |
5466042 | Herman | Nov 1995 | A |
5664829 | Thomson | Sep 1997 | A |
6561579 | Weir | May 2003 | B1 |
6874849 | Cox | Apr 2005 | B1 |
7431391 | Hsiao | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7673936 | Hsu | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7681947 | Ritchey | Mar 2010 | B2 |
8007041 | Tisue | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8016349 | Mouri et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8083289 | Chang | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8177251 | Shirai | May 2012 | B2 |
8191964 | Hsu | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8267470 | Hsu | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8302983 | Hsu | Nov 2012 | B1 |
8308124 | Hsu | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8596663 | Shirai | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8640999 | Chen | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8727436 | Connors | May 2014 | B2 |
8894141 | Tisue | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8950771 | Felsi et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
9027434 | Neeley | May 2015 | B2 |
9126647 | Kuo | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9157523 | Miki et al. | Oct 2015 | B2 |
9242688 | McAndrews et al. | Jan 2016 | B2 |
9580124 | Shirai | Feb 2017 | B2 |
9745009 | Lin | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9845126 | Ritchey | Dec 2017 | B2 |
10370051 | Staples | Aug 2019 | B2 |
10780933 | Choltco-Devlin | Sep 2020 | B2 |
20050200170 | Liao | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20060066074 | Turner | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060152045 | Okajima | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20070063554 | Liao | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20090066124 | Pirovano | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090174237 | Chen | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20100052377 | Hsu | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100244509 | Chang | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20110257848 | Shirai | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20120104221 | Hsu | May 2012 | A1 |
20120243931 | Hsu | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20130093231 | Hsu | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130113242 | Connors | May 2013 | A1 |
20130119719 | Bigolin | May 2013 | A1 |
20130221713 | Pelot et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130228668 | D'Aluisio | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130327916 | Muff | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140013875 | Neeley | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140239682 | Tisue | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140308071 | Darley | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20150034779 | McAndrews et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150232142 | Shirai | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150239516 | Nelson | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20160009326 | Lin et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160023702 | Lin | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20170106928 | Madau et al. | Apr 2017 | A1 |
20170166275 | McPherson | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20180015976 | Hermansen | Jan 2018 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1799535 | Oct 2013 | EP |
2004330815 | Nov 2004 | JP |
WO2016029301 | Mar 2016 | WO |
WO2016113673 | Jul 2016 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20190300089 A1 | Oct 2019 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62651379 | Apr 2018 | US |