The present invention concerns a safety chamber to be used in a packing machine in which sealed packaging containers or carton packages are formed from a packing material web.
Before the packaging containers are formed and filled the packaging material web passes a sterilization part. In the sterilization part the packaging material web first enters an inlet chamber, passes a sterilization bath, containing hydrogen peroxide. After the sterilization or peroxide bath the packaging material web goes into an aseptic chamber. In the aseptic chamber there is an overpressure to assure a sterile environment, while there is an underpressure in the inlet chamber above the peroxide bath. The peroxide bath acts as a liquid seal between the aseptic chamber and the inlet chamber of the peroxide bath. The underpressure in the inlet chamber reduces the risk of peroxide emissions to the environment.
When the packing machine is in production there is sometimes a need for shorter or longer stops, either planned stops or stops due to some malfunction. During stops the peroxide bath is drained and, thus, there will be no seal between the aseptic chamber and the inlet chamber. Due to the different pressures there might possibly, in some occasions in different machine steps, be a risk of hydrogen peroxide emissions.
One aim of the present invention is to further secure that any risk of hydrogen peroxide emissions from the sterilization part of the packing machine is avoided, during any stops in the production.
The present invention is intended for packaging machine forming sealed packaging containers from a packaging material web. The packaging material web is led through a sterilization portion comprising an inlet chamber, a peroxide bath and an aseptic chamber. The packaging material web is led from the inlet chamber through the peroxide bath and then into the aseptic chamber. In the inlet for the packaging material web into the inlet chamber a lip seal is arranged. In production the aseptic chamber is held at an overpressure while the inlet chamber is held at an underpressure. According to the invention a safety chamber is placed in front of the inlet to the inlet chamber, whereby the packaging material web passes the safety chamber before going into the inlet chamber.
Further objects and advantages of the present invention will be obvious to a person skilled in the art reading the detailed description below of one embodiment of the invention.
The invention will be described more closely below in way of an example and with reference to the enclosed drawings. In the drawings:
As shown in
To eliminate any risk of hydrogen peroxide emissions to the environment outside the packaging machine the inlet chamber 2 is held at a constant underpressure in production. Also the lip seal 3 of the inlet chamber 2 assists in securing elimination of any risk of peroxide emissions. A suction pipe 4 connects by means of a valve 8 the inlet chamber 2 with a main suction pipe 7. In the aseptic chamber 6 there is an overpressure during production.
The peroxide bath 5 will in practice form a seal between the inlet chamber 2 held at underpressure and the aseptic chamber 6 held at overpressure. During short stops, due to some unforeseen event, and normal scheduled stops in the packaging machine, the peroxide bath 5 is drained. Pipes and valves for drainage of the peroxide bath are not shown in the simplified sketches of
According to the present invention a safety chamber 12 is placed in front of the inlet for the packaging material web 1 into the inlet chamber 2. A lip seal 13 is placed at the inlet for the packaging material web 1 into the safety chamber 12. A suction pipe 14 opens into the safety chamber 12. Said suction pipe 14 is connected to the suction pipe 4 of the inlet chamber 2 by means of a check valve 15, controlling the pressure of the safety chamber 12. The check valve 15 is normally adjustable to control the pressure. By means of the suction pipe 14 it is possible to form an underpressure in the safety chamber 12. The packaging material web 1 will thus pass two lip seals 3, 13 and the safety chamber 12 before going into the inlet chamber 2.
By means of the suction pipe 14 the safety chamber 12 will be held at an underpressure both during stops and in normal production. As stated above, the peroxide bath 5 is drained during stops in the packaging machine. During stops the safety chamber 12 will still be held at an underpressure even if the inlet chamber 2 is held at an overpressure. Thus, any peroxide emissions passing the lip seal 3 of the inlet chamber 2 will be sucked out of the safety chamber 12 without passing to the environment. Any overpressure inside the inlet chamber 2 will act on the lip seal 3 of the inlet chamber 2 in a closing position. Thus, both in normal operation and during stops the lip seals 3, 13 of both the inlet chamber 2 and the safety chamber 12 will protect against peroxide emissions. The protection against peroxide emission given by the two lip seals 3, 13 are further supported by the underpressure in the inlet chamber 2 during normal production and the underpressure in the safety chamber 12 during stops.
In the example shown in
If a packaging material web having no necks are used both lip seals 3, 13 and the underpressure of the safety chamber 12 will act against any peroxide emissions.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
0900430 | Apr 2009 | SE | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/SE2009/000531 | 12/21/2009 | WO | 00 | 9/30/2011 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2010/114434 | 10/7/2010 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3884012 | Ernstsson et al. | May 1975 | A |
3899862 | Muys et al. | Aug 1975 | A |
3904361 | Egger | Sep 1975 | A |
3911640 | Rausing | Oct 1975 | A |
4225556 | Lothman et al. | Sep 1980 | A |
4495016 | Viberg et al. | Jan 1985 | A |
4641486 | Zannoni | Feb 1987 | A |
4707334 | Gerhard | Nov 1987 | A |
4969998 | Henn | Nov 1990 | A |
5008076 | Johansson et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5011664 | Olanders | Apr 1991 | A |
5044140 | Iwano et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
5129999 | Holland et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5424034 | Hilmersson | Jun 1995 | A |
5431939 | Cox et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5672374 | McCabe | Sep 1997 | A |
5947318 | Palm | Sep 1999 | A |
5972292 | DeMeo | Oct 1999 | A |
6622457 | Kurth | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6666002 | Otsuka et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6810644 | Palm | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6885011 | Koenck et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
7003934 | Yano | Feb 2006 | B1 |
7007441 | Benedetti et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7093405 | Andersson et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7154103 | Koenck et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7205016 | Garwood | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7415428 | Garwood | Aug 2008 | B2 |
8658085 | Kristiansson et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
20010035500 | Schianchi et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010053402 | Orii et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20030185948 | Garwood | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040011004 | Kurth | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040086421 | Moller et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20050076612 | Andersson et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050126117 | Benedetti et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20060150343 | Christ | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20090071104 | Fischer | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090208369 | Olsson et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090282784 | Ferrarini et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20110146205 | Caudle et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20140196407 | Ghirardello et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
895851 | Aug 1983 | BE |
10 2005 012 507 | Sep 2006 | DE |
1 245 493 | Oct 2002 | EP |
WO 8203832 | Nov 1982 | WO |
WO 9812112 | Mar 1998 | WO |
WO 2005120960 | Dec 2005 | WO |
Entry |
---|
*International Search Report (PCT/ISA/210) issued on Aug. 20, 2010, by Swedish Patent Office as the International Searching Authority for International Application No. PCT/SE2009/000531. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120036814 A1 | Feb 2012 | US |