Safety circuits are used in a variety of applications. A safety circuit typically provides a control over a supply of power to a load, for example. One use of safety circuits is within elevator systems. A daisy chain arrangement of safety switches along a hoistway provides an ability to control whether the elevator machine is powered to cause movement of an elevator car. The switches of the safety circuit along the daisy chain are associated with an elevator door component such as a hoistway door lock. Whenever the door component is not in a properly closed position, the safety switch remains open and interrupts a conductive path along the safety chain. Under these conditions, power is not provided to the elevator machine so that the elevator car cannot move. The safety chain therefore provides an ability to prevent elevator car movement in the event that a hoistway door is not closed or properly locked.
Known safety chains in elevator systems operate based on 110 volt AC power. While such systems have proved reliable and useful over the years, there is a desire to reduce power consumption in elevator systems. One opportunity to reduce power consumption would be to introduce a lower power safety chain circuit. This cannot be done, however, without introducing new design challenges and complexities.
An exemplary safety circuit includes a plurality of contacts that are configured to establish a conductive path across the contacts when the contacts are in electrically conductive contact with each other. The contacts selectively interrupt the conductive path across them when the contacts are separated. A controller selectively introduces a voltage pulse across the contacts at a voltage level that is effective to overcome an electrical resistance of any contamination on at least one of the contacts. The controller introduces the voltage pulse at least when the contacts are expected to be in contact to establish the conductive path.
An exemplary method of operating a safety circuit, which includes a plurality of contacts that are configured to establish a conductive path across the contacts when they are in electrically conductive contact with each other and to selectively interrupt the conductive path when the contacts are separated, includes selectively introducing a voltage pulse across the contacts at a voltage level that is effective to overcome an electrical resistance of any contamination on at least one of the contacts. The voltage pulse can be introduced when the contacts are expected to be in contact to establish the conductive path.
The various features and advantages of the disclosed examples will become apparent to those skilled in the art from the following detailed description. The drawings that accompany the detailed description can be briefly described as follows.
The example safety circuit 20 includes additional contacts 26 and 28 that are configured to be selectively coupled to each other or separated from each other and electrical contacts 30 and 32 that are configured to be coupled to each other or separated from each other.
The example safety circuit 20 includes an energy flow controlling device 40 that controls whether power is provided to a load responsive to the condition or position of the contacts 22-32. In one example, whenever any one of the sets of contacts is separated so that the conductive path across them is interrupted, the energy flow controlling element 40 will not allow power to be provided to the associated load.
In the example of
One advantage to using a low voltage DC power source is lower power consumption. One challenge introduced by utilizing a low voltage DC power source instead of a high voltage AC power source, for example, is that a possibility exists for contamination or corrosion to build up on any one of the contacts along the safety circuit 20. Such contamination or corrosion can interfere with an electrically conductive coupling between the associated contacts even though they are in the position in which they otherwise would electrically contact each other. Corrosion or contamination on at least one of the contacts may introduce an electrical resistance that is too high for the relatively low voltage of the low voltage power source 44 to overcome such that the contacts do not appear closed or in contact with each other. Under such circumstances, a false determination is made by the energy flow controlling device 40. Even though the contacts may all be closed, corrosion or contamination on at least one of them preventing the power from the low voltage power source to flow across those contacts will be interpreted by the energy flow controlling device 40 as at least one of the sets of contacts being open.
It is not practical to manually clean the contacts on a regular basis. The illustrated example includes a new way to overcome the effects of such contamination or corrosion. The example of
The electrical pulse introduced by the controller 50 is effective in some examples to clean the contacts and remove any corrosion or contamination from them that was otherwise interfering with an electrical coupling between the contacts.
The example of
In the example of
There are a variety of uses for a safety circuit as shown in the example of
In one example, prior to an elevator run when an elevator car will accelerate from a stopped position, the controller 50 introduces a voltage pulse along the safety circuit to remove any contamination or corrosion from the contacts and overcome any electrical resistance associated with such contamination or corrosion. In another example, whenever it is expected that all of the contacts will be coupled with each other but at least one set of contacts appears to be separated, the controller 50 introduces the voltage pulse to overcome the effects of any corrosion or contamination on the corresponding contacts. After the voltage pulse is introduced, if the contacts still appear open, a determination is made that a corresponding door component is not in the proper position or condition to allow for the elevator car to move, for example.
In one example, the controller 50 recognizes when the transportation system is in an inspection mode. The controller 50 in such an example prevents the pulse from being introduced across the contacts.
In the illustrated example, the energy of the pulse is limited to a peak voltage that would render any contact between a contact to which the pulse is applied and an individual harmless. There are standards that discuss the effect of current on humans. It is known that the human body can be represented by a resistance of 500 Ohms With a peak voltage of 150V and a peak current of 0.3 amps, the energy of a pulse is 22.5 A2s and the discharge energy is in the range of 45 μJ. That energy level is perceivable by an individual who touched a contact but is below a pain threshold. Therefore, when appropriate limits are placed on the pulse it may not be necessary to restrict the application of the pulse even during an inspection mode.
The disclosed example approach of introducing a voltage pulse to overcome electrical resistance associated with contamination or corrosion, allows for efficiently incorporating low voltage safety circuits into a variety of situations. The advantage of having a lower power safety circuit can be realized while at the same time avoiding the drawback associated with the potential for contamination or corrosion on at least one of the safety circuit contacts interfering with an ability to properly detect closed contacts.
The preceding description is exemplary rather than limiting in nature. Variations and modifications to the disclosed examples may become apparent to those skilled in the art that do not necessarily depart from the essence of this invention. The scope of legal protection given to this invention can only be determined by studying the following claims.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2010/032165 | 4/23/2010 | WO | 00 | 10/3/2012 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2011/133163 | 10/27/2011 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2817774 | Kniel et al. | Dec 1957 | A |
4266632 | Yoneda et al. | May 1981 | A |
5523633 | Imaizumi et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5549179 | Herkel et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
6446760 | Lisi | Sep 2002 | B1 |
7362011 | Komatsu et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
9057743 | Alley | Jun 2015 | B2 |
20090218176 | Tyni et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20130146399 | De Coi et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20140312871 | Alley | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140312909 | Alley | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140312923 | Alley | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140320138 | Acharya et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140320195 | Desai et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2565125 | Aug 2003 | CN |
1-139322 | Sep 1989 | JP |
6166477 | Jun 1994 | JP |
H07230750 | Aug 1995 | JP |
H11234925 | Aug 1999 | JP |
2006310287 | Nov 2006 | JP |
2009023820 | Feb 2009 | JP |
Entry |
---|
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application No. PCT/US2010/32165 dated Nov. 1, 2012. |
First Search for Chinese Patent Application No. 901080066370.5 dated Nov. 26, 2013. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for International application No. PCT/US2010/032165 mailed Jan. 21, 2011. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130025976 A1 | Jan 2013 | US |