Safety Device for a Motor Vehicle and Method for Operating a Motor Vehicle

Abstract

The invention relates to a device and method for increasing the safety of a motor vehicle. A first sensor unit (2) detects the environment, in particular free spaces and objects (0) and the position and motion of said objects. A second sensor unit (20) detects the environment state, a third sensor unit (30) detects the vehicle state, and a fourth sensor unit (40) detects the driver specifications. The data are amalgamated. According to the invention, a driving safety coordinator (6) is provided, which calculates the risk of collision on the basis of a risk evaluation, and the driving safety coordinator (6) determines pre-collision phases (P1, P2, P3, P4a, P4b) of the motor vehicle (1) with regard to the object (0).

Description

This invention relates to a safety device for a motor vehicle with

at least one sensor unit for detecting the environmental conditions and for the output of environmental data, an evaluation unit for merging the environmental data and an evaluation unit for detecting free spaces and objects, and the position and movement thereof, and with

at least one sensor unit for detecting the state of the environment and for the output of environmental status data and an evaluation unit for merging the environmental data with the environmental status data to determine a proposed coefficient of friction, and with

at least one sensor unit for detecting the vehicle state and for the output of vehicle status data and an evaluation unit for merging the vehicle status data with driver input data to determine the driving state, and with

at least one sensor unit for detecting the driver inputs and for the output of driver input data and an evaluation unit for merging the driver input data with the vehicle status data to determine the driver's setpoint course. The invention further relates to a method for operating a motor vehicle.

Such a safety device and method for increasing safety in road traffic is known from EP 1 735 187 A1. In the known system, a supporting driving maneuver is determined during or after a steering action as part of an avoidance maneuver initiated by the driver, wherein the driver input can be overridden at any time. This known method determines based on environmental signals if a critical situation with respect to driving dynamics exists or if a collision is imminent. The method is preferably used for avoidance maneuvers in emergency situations.

It is the object of the present invention to introduce a method which, taking into account the driving situation, proactively ensures maximum driving safety that supports the driver in his or her driving job as best as possible.

This object is achieved by a method and device having the features of the independent claims. A system and a method are proposed for situation and collision phase optimized brake force control and chassis adjustment for combined braking/avoidance maneuvers for motor vehicles. A driving safety coordinator is provided that calculates the collision risk based on a risk assessment. In addition, the driving safety coordinator determines multiple precollision phases of the vehicle with respect to the object. In this process, the driving safety coordinator determines the last point to brake for stopping before reaching the object, a last point to steer of the unbraked vehicle for evading and a last point to steer of the braked vehicle for avoiding the object. The precollision phases are designed such that they start or end at these points. One rationale of the invention is that the driving safety coordinator extends the precollision phases situatively by a driver-independent braking intervention.

The decisive inventive idea is that the driving safety coordinator predictively and situatively performs a combined braking/avoiding maneuver within the precollision phases of the motor vehicle to ensure operational safety. In this way, the driving safety coordinator makes the precollision phases controllable for the driver, either situatively or based on driver input, in accordance with the collision risk, the vehicle state and the proposed coefficient of friction, taking into account an avoidance option, a combined braking/avoiding maneuver or a braking maneuver.

In a further development of the subject matter of the invention, the driving safety coordinator receives information regarding the coefficient of friction between the tire and the road based on an estimate, wherein the proposed coefficient of friction is determined from a driver-independent or driver-initiated braking intervention.

In a particularly advantageous development, the driving safety coordinator predictively and situatively determines at least one permissible driving corridor and/or an optimal movement trajectory in order to ensure operational safety and restricts the driver input to the driving corridor using actively addressable components and keeps the motor vehicle in the driving corridor or on the movement trajectory using the actively addressable components. The driving safety coordinator is configured to give the driver a haptic, acoustic and/or optical warning and/or steering recommendation.

The problem underlying this invention is also solved by a device having the features of claim 9. A safety coordinator calculates the collision risk and determines precollision phases of the motor vehicle with respect to the object. In this process, the last point to brake for stopping before reaching the object, a last point to steer of the unbraked vehicle for evading, and a last point to steer of the braked vehicle for avoiding the object are determined. The precollision phases start or end at these points. The precollision phases are also extended by means of a driver-independent braking intervention.

The decisive inventive idea is that a combined braking/avoiding maneuver is performed predictively and situatively within the precollision phases of the motor vehicle to ensure operational safety. In this way, the precollision phases are optimized and made controllable for the driver, either situatively or based on driver input, in accordance with the collision risk, the vehicle state and the proposed coefficient of friction, taking into account an avoidance option, a combined braking/avoiding maneuver or a braking maneuver.

Another decisive idea is that the precollision phases are redetermined if another object is detected in the direction of movement of the vehicle. In a subsequent scenario, the precollision phases are repeated if another obstacle occurs after or during a change into another lane. The respective phases of the method will then be repeated.

The invention will be explained in more detail below, with reference to an embodiment and the enclosed figure. Wherein:

FIG. 1 shows a schematic of a vehicle with environment sensors for detecting objects in the environment of the vehicle;

FIG. 2 shows a schematic of a driver assistance system;

FIG. 3 shows a block diagram of the safety device according to the invention;

FIG. 4 shows a schematic of precollision phases, and

FIG. 5 a,b shows the longitudinal and transverse forces of a vehicle tire, also known as Kamm's circle.

The term “steering wheel” in the meaning of this invention represents all conceivable man-machine interfaces that a driver can operate for steering and driving the motor vehicle, such as switch inputs, a joystick or a touch pad, as well as remotely transmitted actuator commands.

A safety device for motor vehicles in general will be explained with reference to FIGS. 1 and 2 and an embodiment of the invention will be explained with reference to FIGS. 3 and 4 below.

FIG. 1 shows an example of a four-wheel, two-axle vehicle 1 that has environment sensors 2 with which objects O in the environment of the vehicle can be detected, which in particular are other vehicles in the same or a neighboring traffic lane to the side from, and/or in front of, the vehicle. Objects O can also be static or almost static objects such as trees, pedestrians, or roadside borders. An example of environment sensors 2 is shown with a detection range 3 that captures a solid angle in front of, next to, or behind the vehicle 1 in which an exemplary object O is shown. The one or more environment sensors 2 may, for example, comprise a LIDAR (Light Detection and Ranging) sensor that is generally known to a person skilled in the art. Other environment sensors such as radar sensors or optical camera systems can also be used.

Furthermore, the information about the environment can be detected using so-called car-to-x communication. This means transmission of environmental information from other vehicles or detection points to the vehicle 1. The environment sensors 2 measure the distances d to the detected points of an object and the angles φ between the connecting lines to these points and the central longitudinal axis of the vehicle, as shown by way of example in FIG. 1 for a point P of the object O. The fronts of the detected objects that face towards the vehicle are composed of multiple acquired points, for which sensor signals are transmitted that establish correlations between points and the shape of an object and determine a reference point for the object O. For example, the center of the object O or the center of the acquired points of the object can be selected as the reference point. Unlike a radar sensor (Doppler effect), a LIDAR environment sensor 2 cannot directly measure the speeds of the detected points and therefore the speed of the detected objects. They are calculated from the difference between the distances measured at subsequent time steps in a cyclically operating object recognition unit 21. Acceleration of the objects can in principle be determined in a similar way by deriving their positions two times.

FIG. 2 shows a diagram of a driver assistance system whose components, except for sensors and actuators and other hardware, are preferably made up of software modules that are executed using a microprocessor inside the vehicle 1. As shown in FIG. 2, object data in the form of electronic signals is transmitted to a decision means 22 within the block diagram of the driver assistance system. The decision means 22 determines an object trajectory based on the information about the object O in block 23. In addition, it determines a movement trajectory of the vehicle 1 in block 24 based on information about the dynamic status of the vehicle 1 that can be obtained using other vehicle sensors 25. Information used particularly includes the vehicle speed that can be determined using wheel speed sensors, the steering angle δ measured using a steering angle sensor on the steerable wheels of the vehicle 1, the yaw rate and/or lateral acceleration of the vehicle 1 that are measured using respective sensors. It is further possible to calculate or estimate model-based variables from the dynamic vehicle states measured using the vehicle sensors 25. An indication of the coefficient of friction between the tires of the vehicle 1 and the road is also obtained from the vehicle sensors or from the condition of the road surface. This proposed coefficient of friction is in particular determined by the brake control system. The decision means 22 then checks in block 26 if the motor vehicle 1 is on a collision course with one of the detected objects O. If such a collision course is found and the collision time, i.e. the time before the detected collision with the object O will occur, which is also determined by the decision means, falls below a specific value, a trigger signal is sent to a path control means 27. The trigger signal initially triggers the calculation of an evasive path, i.e. a movement trajectory, in the path control means. Then a starting point for the evasive maneuver is determined based on the evasive path or movement trajectory determined, which is the point at which the evasive maneuver must be started to be able to just avoid the object O. These steps are preferably repeated in time increments until there is no more collision risk due to course changes of the object O or the vehicle 1 or until the vehicle 1 reaches the starting point for an evasion maneuver. If this is the case, the evasive path or parameters representing this path are sent to a steering actuator control means 28.

FIG. 3 shows a schematic of the safety device according to the invention. The underlying idea is the interconnection of the various sensor units 2, 20, 30, 40. A data merger is performed using the data available from the sensor units 2, 20, 30, 40. A data merger is the pooling and completion of incomplete records for data cleansing. Several records, some of which are incomplete, must be combined to obtain a complete picture of the environment. Before data of the records from two sensor units 2, 20, 30, 40 can be merged, the data must be brought into a joint data schema. This process is also called data schema integration. The data merger makes it possible to obtain information on the environment of the vehicle 1 at improved data quality. Better data quality means more accurate and faster calculation of the collision risk and the precollision phases P1, P2, P3, P4a, P4b. As is explained below, data is also merged to obtain improved information on the condition of the environment, the vehicle state and driver input.

At least one sensor unit 2 is used to detect the environmental conditions. As stated above, this system of environment sensors 2 is comprised of a radar, lidar, or video camera system or a combination thereof. The information obtained using at least one of these sensor units 2 is pooled with map information, GPS data and information received using car-to-x communication to obtain an environmental information pool in an evaluation unit 4. After the merger of the data, the improved environmental data is evaluated with the purpose of detecting objects O. The position and movement information of an object O is sent to a driving safety coordinator 6. This driving safety coordinator 6 determined precollision phases P1, P2, P3, P4a, P4b based on limits of driving physics and taking into account the environment data, and thus predictively and situatively ensures the operational safety of the vehicle 1 in that the precollision phases P1, P2, P3, P4a, P4b are designed such that a combined braking/avoiding maneuver or a braking maneuver is performed. The precollision phases P1, P2, P3, P4a, P4b are explained in more detail with reference to FIG. 4 below.

As can further be derived from FIG. 3, at least one other sensor unit 20 is used to detect the state of the surroundings. This at least one sensor unit 20 for detecting an environmental state is formed by a rain sensor, a thermoelement and/or a camera system. The environmental status information detected and the tire characteristic of the vehicle tires used are merged in the evaluation unit 24, and a proposed coefficient of friction between the tires and the road surface is determined from the cleansed environment data in step 25. The proposed coefficient of friction may for example be based on knowledge of the condition of the road surface. The determined coefficient of friction proposal is also forwarded to the driving safety coordinator 6.

Another at least one sensor unit 30 is used to detect the vehicle state. The at least one sensor unit 30 for detecting the vehicle state consists of a wheel speed sensor, a lateral acceleration sensor, a longitudinal acceleration sensor, and/or a yaw rate sensor. A combination of the sensors mentioned is also conceivable. The sensor unit 30 for detecting the vehicle state is also called vehicle status monitor. An evaluation unit 34 associated with the vehicle status monitor combines the vehicle status data with the determined coefficient of friction proposal in the form of a data merger. The vehicle status is calculated in this way in step 35 and output to the driving safety coordinator 6.

As FIG. 3 also discloses, at least one other sensor unit 40 is provided to detect driver input and to output driver input data. This at least one sensor unit 40 for detecting the driver input is formed by a steering angle sensor, a pedal angle sensor for the brake pedal and/or the accelerator pedal and/or a transmitter of the direction indicator. The transmitter of the direction indicator is colloquially referred to as a flasher. The information says if the driver wants to turn left or right. The vehicle status information just determined is sent to the evaluation unit 44 and merged there with the driver input data. Since the data merger means pooling and completion of incomplete records, it results in data cleansing, and a precise driver's setpoint course is calculated in step 45 and output to the driving safety coordinator 6.

Thus the position and movement of the object O and the determined coefficient of friction proposal are transmitted to the driving safety coordinator 6. The driving safety coordinator 6 also receives information about the vehicle state and the driver's setpoint course. These data are used to determine a permissible driving corridor or an optimum movement trajectory. The driving corridor or movement trajectory is determined situatively and predictively. The driving corridor or movement trajectory bypass the object O on its left and right within the predicted avoidance space. To keep the vehicle 1 in the permissible corridor or optimum movement trajectory, active components 9 are actuated such that the driver input is restricted to the available corridor or optimum movement trajectory. These actively addressable components 9 are located in the chassis or in a man-machine interface such as brake pedal, driving engine, steering system, transmission, shock absorber, stabilizer, or direction indicator. The driving safety coordinator 6 actuates the actively addressable components 9 such that a counterforce is generated in the accelerator pedal, an intervention in the driving engine, an intervention in the power train, or a braking interventions is performed to keep the vehicle in the driving corridor or movement trajectory. Alternatively, or in addition, the actively addressable components 9 are actuated such that an additional steering torque and/or additional steering angle or a braking intervention aimed at individual wheels is generated to generate a yaw moment. This actuation is also suited to keep the vehicle in the driving corridor or movement trajectory. In a special embodiment, the driver can override each action of the system, so that the driver keeps control over his or her vehicle 1.

It will now be explained with reference to FIG. 4 how the situation optimized brake force control for a combined braking/avoiding maneuver is performed within the precollision phases according to the invention. In phase P0, the vehicle 1 approaches an object O in the direction of travel shown, and a warning W is issued to the driver. This warning W is given via a man-machine interface 7, also called human machine interface or in short HMI. The warning W can be given to the driver by haptic, acoustic, or optical means. All addressable components of the man-machine interface 7 are suitable, such as a counterforce on the accelerator pedal or a vibration of the steering wheel. Warning lamps and acoustic warnings are also suitable for warning the driver of the vehicle.

In the precollision phase 1, the driving safety coordinator 6 calculates a last point to brake (PTB). In addition, a last point to steer PTS-u of the unbraked vehicle 1 and a last point to steer PTS-b of the braked vehicle 1 are determined. The abbreviations PTS-u and PTS-b were derived from the English terms “last point to steer—unbraked” and “last point to steer—braked lane change”. The lane can be changed to the left or to the right and several subsequent times, as shown. A multi-object and multi-collision situation is assumed for multiple avoidance maneuvers.

As can also be derived from FIG. 4, the position and length of the precollision phase P3 between the last point to steer PTS-u of the unbraked vehicle 1 and the last point to steer PTS-b of the braked vehicle 1 can be influenced, which is indicated by the double-headed arrow A. The precollision phase P3 can be changed when the situation requires it by a driver-independent braking intervention. In other words, the position of the last point to steer of the braked and unbraked vehicle 1 PTS-u and PTS-b and thus the length of the precollision phase P3 is set by means of brake force distribution such that an avoiding maneuver will be made possible only if the system has detected an avoidance option. The reason why the last point to steer PTS-b of the braked vehicle 1 is further to the left than the last point to steer PTS-u of the unbraked vehicle is that a vehicle tire can transfer more steering forces to the road if the vehicle tire only has to transfer little or no brake force to the road. Brief reference will be made in this context to Kamm's circle shown in FIGS. 5a and 5b: It results in a direction vector for the vehicle 1. The vehicle tire transfers forces to the road when the vehicle 1 accelerates or brakes and just like when it is steered to the left or to the right. As can be derived directly from the Kamm's circle, the unbraked, non-driven vehicle wheel can transfer the greatest steering forces to the road.

If at the start of precollision phase P3 the brake pressure of a driver-independent braking intervention in the wheel brakes is reduced or lowered down to zero, the wheels will be easier to steer because more steering force can be transferred to the road, as has been explained as well. If the brake pressure is reduced or lowered to zero at the start of precollision phase 3, the last point to steer moves towards the obstacle or object O. This last point to steer is then the PTS-u of the unbraked vehicle 1, since the brake pressure was reduced to zero. This means that the position and length of the precollision phase P3 is changed by the distribution of the brake force. The method described here utilizes this knowledge in that the driving safety coordinator 6 situatively influences the position and length of the precollision phase P3 between the last point to steer PTS-u of the unbraked vehicle 1 for evasion and the last point to steer PTS-b of the braked vehicle 1 for avoiding the object O by means of a driver-independent braking intervention to optimize an emergency brake operation in the precollision phase P4a or an avoidance maneuver in the precollision phase 4b. The brake force of the driver-independent braking intervention may either be distributed evenly or unevenly over the right and left wheels of the vehicle 1, so that the avoidance maneuver is supported if the brake force is distributed unevenly.

If there is no avoidance space available, the brake power is optimized at an early point in time well before the PTS-u so that as much speed as possible is lost. The driver is warned respectively earlier. This means that the driving safety coordinator initiates an emergency brake operation in the precollision phase P4a if there is no avoidance option available. In this case, the brake power is optimized in the precollision phase 4a. A collision of the vehicle 1 with the object O can just be avoided by this measure, or the consequences of the collision are reduced as much as the space available as brake path allows.

The driving safety coordinator 6 predictively and situatively determines at least one permissible driving corridor and/or an optimum movement trajectory in order to ensure operational safety. As explained with reference to FIG. 3, actively addressable components 9 restrict the driver input to the driving corridor and keep the motor vehicle 1 in the driving corridor or on the movement trajectory. The driving safety coordinator 6 influences the position and length of the precollision phase P3 between the last point to steer PTS-u of the unbraked vehicle 1 for evasion and the last point to steer PTS-b of the braked vehicle 1 for avoiding the object O, or the last possible points to steer PTS-u, PTS-b to optimize an avoidance maneuver, taking into account the permissible driving corridor and/or the optimum movement trajectory.

If an avoidance option is detected, a combined braking/avoiding maneuver is performed in precollision phase P3. In the subsequent phase 4b, the driver-independent braking intervention is released again so that the rapid passage by the obstacle is not is not hindered. If the lane is blocked by another obstacle O, the precollision phases P1′, P2′, P3′, P4a′, and P4b′ are determined anew. Another combined braking/avoiding maneuver is performed in accordance with the new precollision phases P1′, P2′, P3′, P4a′, P4b′.

The evaluation units 4, 5, 24, 25, 34, 35, 44, 45 may also be designed as software components or process steps of a method within a common evaluation unit.

In the present invention, a driving safety coordinator, taking into account the environment, environmental conditions, the vehicle state and the driver input, divides a critical driving situation into the precollision phases P1, P2, P3, P4a, P4b and influences the position and length of phase P3 by means of driver-independent braking interventions such that an emergency brake operation P4a, an emergency avoidance maneuver P4b, or a combined emergency braking/avoiding maneuver is optimized. It is also configured that the precollision phases P1′, P2′, P3′, P4a′, P4b′ are determined anew when another object O is detected in the direction of movement of the vehicle 1.

Claims

1. A safety device for a motor vehicle (1) with at least one sensor unit (2) for detecting the environmental conditions and for the output of environmental data, an evaluation unit (4) for merging the environmental data and an evaluation unit (5) for detecting free spaces and objects (O), and the position and movement thereof, and with at least one sensor unit (20) for detecting the state of the environment and for the output of environmental status data and an evaluation unit (24) for merging the environmental data with the environmental status data to determine a proposed coefficient of friction, and with at least one sensor unit (30) for detecting the vehicle state and for the output of vehicle status data and an evaluation unit (34) for merging the vehicle status data with the proposed coefficient of friction and the driver input data to determine the driving state, and with at least one sensor unit (40) for detecting the driver inputs and for the output of driver input data and an evaluation unit (44) for merging the driver input data with the vehicle status data to determine the driver's setpoint course, characterized in that a driving safety coordinator (6) is provided that calculates the collision risk based on a risk assessment, and that said driving safety coordinator (6) determines precollision phases (P1, P2, P3, P4a, P4b) of the vehicle (1) with respect to the object (O).

2. The safety device according to claim 1, characterized in that the driving safety coordinator (6) determines a last point to brake (PTB) for stopping before reaching the object (O), a last point to steer (PTS-u) of the unbraked vehicle (1) for evading and a last point to steer (PTS-b) of the braked motor vehicle (1) for avoiding the object (O), and that the precollision phases (P1, P2, P3, P4a, P4b) start or stop at these points (PTB, PTS-b, PTS-u).

3. The safety device according to claim 2, characterized in that the driving safety coordinator (6) situatively influences the position and length of the precollision phase (P3) between the last point to steer (PTS-u) of the unbraked vehicle (1) for evasion and the last point to steer (PTS-b) of the braked vehicle (1) for avoiding the object (O) by means of a driver-independent braking intervention to optimize an emergency brake operation (P4a) or an avoidance maneuver (P4b).

4. The safety device according to claim 3, characterized in that the brake force of the driver-independent braking intervention is either distributed evenly or unevenly over the right and left wheels of the vehicle (1), so that an avoidance maneuver is supported if the brake force is distributed unevenly.

5. The safety device according to claim 1, characterized in that the driving safety coordinator (6) predictively and situatively performs a combined braking/avoiding maneuver within the precollision phases (P1, P2, P3, P4a, P4b) of the motor vehicle (1) to ensure operational safety.

6. The safety device according to claim 5, characterized in that the driving safety coordinator (6) makes the precollision phases (P1, P2, P3, P4a, P4b) controllable for the driver, either situatively or based on driver input, in accordance with the collision risk, the vehicle state and the proposed coefficient of friction, taking into account an avoidance option, a combined braking/avoiding maneuver, or a braking maneuver.

7. The safety device according to claim 1, characterized in that the driving safety coordinator (6) receives information regarding the coefficient of friction between the tire and the road based on an estimate, wherein the proposed coefficient of friction is determined from a driver-independent or driver-initiated braking intervention.

8. The safety device according to claim 1, characterized in that the driving safety coordinator (6) predictively and situatively determines at least one permissible driving corridor and/or an optimal movement trajectory in order to ensure operational safety and restricts the driver input to the driving corridor using actively addressable components (9) and keeps the motor vehicle (1) in the driving corridor or on the movement trajectory using the actively addressable components (9).

9. The safety device according to claim 2, characterized in that the driving safety coordinator (6) influences the position and length of the precollision phase (P3) between the last point to steer (PTS-u) of the unbraked vehicle (1) for evasion and the last point to steer (PTS-b) of the braked vehicle (1) for avoiding the object (O), or the last possible points to steer (PTS-u, PTS-b) to optimize an avoidance maneuver, taking into account the permissible driving corridor and/or the optimum movement trajectory.

10. The safety device according to claim 1, characterized in that the driving safety coordinator (6) is configured to issue a haptic, acoustic and/or optical warning and/or a steering recommendation to the driver.

11. A method for operating a motor vehicle (1) with at least one sensor unit (2) for detecting the environmental conditions and for the output of environmental data, an evaluation unit (4) for merging the environmental data and an evaluation unit (5) for detecting free spaces and objects (O), and the position and movement thereof, and with at least one sensor unit (20) for detecting the state of the environment and for the output of environmental status data and an evaluation unit (24) for merging the environmental data with the environmental status data to determine a proposed coefficient of friction, and with at least one sensor unit (30) for detecting the vehicle state and for the output of vehicle status data and an evaluation unit (34) for merging the vehicle status data with driver input data to determine the driving state, and with at least one sensor unit (40) for detecting the driver inputs and for the output of driver input data and an evaluation unit (44) for merging the driver input data with the vehicle status data to determine the driver's setpoint course, characterized in that a driving safety coordinator (6) calculates the collision risk based on a risk assessment, and that precollision phases (P1, P2, P3, P4a, P4b) of the motor vehicle (1) with respect to the object (O) are determined.

12. The method according to claim 11, characterized in that a last point to brake (PTB) for stopping before reaching the object (O), a last point to steer (PTS-u) of the unbraked vehicle (1) for evading and a last point to steer (PTS-b) of the braked motor vehicle (1) for avoiding the object (O) are determined, and that the precollision phases (P1, P2, P3, P4a, P4b) start or stop at these points (PTB, PTS-b, PTS-u).

13. The method according to claim 12, characterized in that the position and length of the precollision phase (P3) between the last point to steer (PTS-u) of the unbraked vehicle (1) for evasion and the last point to steer (PTS-b) of the braked motor vehicle (1) for avoiding the object (O) are situatively influenced by means of a driver-independent braking intervention to optimize an emergency brake operation (P4a) or an avoidance maneuver (P4b).

14. The method according to claim 11, characterized in that a combined braking/avoiding maneuver is performed predictively and situatively within the precollision phases (P1, P2, P3, P4a, P4b) of the motor vehicle (1) to ensure operational safety.

15. The method according to claim 14, characterized in that the precollision phases (P1, P2, P3, P4a, P4b) are optimized and made controllable for the driver, either situatively or based on driver input, in accordance with the collision risk, the vehicle state and the proposed coefficient of friction, taking into account an avoidance option, a combined braking/avoiding maneuver, or a braking maneuver.

16. The method according to claim 11, characterized in that the precollision phases (P1′, P2′, P3′, P4a′, P4b′) are determined anew in a multi-object and/or multi-collision situation when another object (O) is detected in the direction of movement of the motor vehicle.