The present invention relates to a safety device for quick-fit attachments. A “quick-fit attachment” is a device which makes it possible to fix a tool to the end of the arm of a hydraulic excavator or the like, which is referred to below as “the machine”.
A “quick-fit attachment” is a mechanical device comprising two parts, of which one is fixed to the tool, for example a dipper, while the other is borne by the arm of the machine.
The prior art on the subject is constituted, in particular, by document FR 2946061.
This document describes an attachment, of which the first part, which is substantially stirrup-shaped and integral with the arm of the machine, comprises a cradle formed by a pair of hooks which is capable of being inserted under a shaft belonging to the second part borne by the tool.
Said second part has a hook-shaped extension which is capable of passing through an opening in the first part and an opening in a sliding locking plate which is capable of being inserted under the said extension when the two parts are pressed against one another.
Means are provided for keeping the locking plate in the “armed position”, that is to say in a position in which the hook-shaped extension is capable of passing freely through the median portion of the first part and the locking plate.
When passing through the two openings, the hook-shaped extension frees the locking plate which, under the action of springs, is inserted under the said extension.
Generally speaking, a quick-fit attachment is designed to be capable of being used with a range of machines having different sizes (and therefore different weights).
Furthermore, it is known that a machine must not shift a load, including the tool, the weight of which exceeds about 15% of its weight. If so, since the load is excessive, the machine may topple over and cause an accident.
In the current state of the art, it has to be recognised that a “small machine” may catch hold of, and handle, a dipper whose weight exceeds the machine's capacity.
The present invention, which has the object of remedying this drawback, relates to a safety device which positively prevents the locking of a dipper whose weight, when loaded, exceeds that of the machine.
Since it is known that the locking of a dipper can only take place on condition that the two parts of the attachment are pressed against one another, the safety device belonging to the invention utilises means, the effect of which is to resist this pressing action if the dipper to be caught hold of exceeds the machine's capabilities.
According to the invention, each part of the attachment has a member which is capable of cooperating with a member belonging to the other part if the weight of the tool, when loaded, does not exceed the capacity of the machine, said cooperation being impossible if this is not the case, so as to resist the pressing of the first part onto the second and to prevent locking.
The present invention will be better understood by means of the description that will follow, by referring to the drawings which are appended solely by way of an indicative example and in which:
According to the known art, the attachment comprises two parts 1 and 2, the part 1 being fixed to the arm of the machine (not shown) while the part 2 is fixed to the upper part of the dipper G.
The part 1 has a pair of hooks 3 which are capable of catching hold, as a result of judicious manoeuvring of the arm of the machine, of a shaft 4 which is borne by the part 2, and of lifting the dipper.
By causing the part 1 to pivot in the direction of the arrow F1, the usual extension 5 passes through the opening in the median part of the part 1 and also through the opening in the locking plate 6, freeing the latter which, when the two parts are pressed against one another, slides in the direction of the arrow F2 so as to be inserted under the said extension 5.
According to the invention, the part 1 has a member which is constituted by a finger 7 which is capable of being inserted freely in a member constituted by a slot 8 in the part 2, the dimensions of the said two members depending upon the size of the machine and of the dipper in such a way that the finger borne by a “small machine” cannot penetrate into the slot in a “large dipper”, although the reverse is naturally possible.
According to one mode of embodiment,
As is apparent from
On the other hand, as is apparent from
According to one variant of embodiment (
It is apparent from the explanations given above that the safety device is disposed on the sides of the parts 1 and 2 which extend parallel to the shaft 4, but a similar result could be obtained if the said device were situated on at least one of the sides which extends substantially at right angles to the said shaft.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1102186 | Jul 2011 | FR | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/FR2012/000207 | 5/24/2012 | WO | 00 | 3/25/2014 |