Safety device to prevent the unintentional closing of a vehicle's trunk or hood lid

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6668422
  • Patent Number
    6,668,422
  • Date Filed
    Thursday, December 13, 2001
    23 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, December 30, 2003
    21 years ago
  • Inventors
  • Examiners
    • Swann; J. J.
    • Ho; Thomas
Abstract
A device used to safely secure a vehicle's trunk or hood lid, hereafter called lid or lids, in an open position is disclosed. The preferred device comprises a ␣ formed fork, which is housed in a vehicle's existing lid support arms, with two ends; two force distribution boots, two friction fittings and a damping-extension block. Upon manual engagement of the fork assembly the two force distribution boots contact the damping-extension block and keep a vehicle's lid from closing. Most vehicles have spring tension assemblies mounted in their lids that operate to keep the lids open by way of stored energy in the spring assemblies. As such, lids equipped with these spring assemblies are subject to unintentional closing by unexpected forces, such as winds, parking a vehicle on a grade or often accidents related to children. In the present invention, the device's flawless operation is entirely independent and void of these actions owing to its design, stability, and simplicity of operation.
Description




CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS















References Cited






U.S. Patent Documents




























2671355




March, 1954




Hawkins




 74/532.







2685353




August, 1954




Caskie




403/108.







4070050




January, 1978




Glock et al.




292/339.







4667993




May, 1987




Hannesson et al.




292/339.







5238213




August, 1993




Pool




248/352.







6029941




Feb. 29, 2000




Mayzes




248/352.







5647619




July, 1997




DeLisio




292/288















BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION




1. Field the Invention




The present invention relates to a restraint for vehicle trunks or hoods, hereafter called lid or lids, and in particular for restraints that serve as safety back-up systems. This invention is to hold a lid open in order to prevent their unintentional closing by unanticipated forces, such as: winds, parking a vehicle on an excessive grade, aging hood or trunk retention assemblies or accidents often associated with children.




2. Discussion of Background




Vehicle lids have long been a cause of injury, sometimes death, by their unintentional closings at inopportune times. These random closing's, seemingly on their own volition, are often caused by unanticipated forces such as: winds, parking a vehicle on an excessive grade, aging hood/trunk retention assemblies or accidents often associated with children. Previously the automotive industry has addressed this problem by having a physical rod, manually placed into position, prop the lid assembly into an open position. Today automobile manufacturers utilize pistons or spring retention assemblies to keep lids into an open position. The inherent problems associated with these systems is that they are highly susceptible to failure owing to aging of the retention assemblies, such as pistons leaking, springs losing their energy storage capabilities, or unexpected forces being exerted upon them or inadvertent closings.




Additionally the current lid mechanisms used today are designed to perform a duality of functions, i.e. closing and opening, whereas earlier lid retention devices, rods, were designed with one goal in mind—to keep the lid open. This duality of function results in a paradox such that neither function, opening or closing, is designed for optimum performance due to conflicting functions.




Furthermore, owing to costs and the number of vehicles manufactured each year, somewhere around 500,000 per manufacturer, the automobile industry is unlikely, at best hesitant, to have a lid retention system uniquely designed for every manufacturers' make and model. And finally, probably the most important issue owing to the possibility of a national recall, manufacturers do not want a solution that cannot cost-effectively retrofit a variety of previously manufactured vehicles.




Therefore as exemplified, the most important considerations in developing a safety device to minimize the probability that a lid will not inadvertently close are: cost, its capability of providing a universal solution, its ability to retrofit existing vehicles and the simplicity of operation—all of which this present invention uniquely satisfies.




BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION




Accordingly with its major aspects already briefly recited, the present invention is a back-up safety device for holding a vehicle's trunk or hood, hereafter called lid or lids, in an open position. The device comprises a ␣ formed fork, which is housed in a vehicle's lid support arm, and swung into contact with an extension-damper assembly whenever it is desired to keep the lid open. One end of the ␣ formed fork is inserted into friction fittings on both sides of the support arm and the other end bent such that the ␣ formed fork now has one leg of the fork on each side of the support arm assembly. Both ends of the ␣ formed fork are fitted with force distribution boots such that when the ␣ formed fork is manually swung down they come in contact with the extension-damper assembly that is mounted to the lids interior well. When this happens the ␣ formed fork ends force distribution boots come in contact with the extension-damper which in turn is connected to the vehicles body assembly and does not allow the lid to move towards the closed position. Two important, related features of the present invention are as follows: When the ␣ formed fork is in the up, storage position, it is kept there by the frictional forces exerted by the two friction fittings, and does not inhibit the opening or closing of the vehicle's lid. Secondly the function of the extension-damper is two fold. Because when swung down the ␣ formed fork must clear the vehicles body assembly it could, without the extension-damper, allow the lid to move in the downward direction some distance before making contact with the vehicles body assembly. Although the ␣ formed fork, without the extension-damper, would not allow the lid to fully close the displacement, that is a function of a particular vehicle, could be sufficient to hit a person's head before stopping the movement. Therefore, one function of the extension damper is to in-effect lengthen each length of the ␣ formed fork such that there is minimal movement of the lid before the ␣ formed fork's force distribution boots make contact with it and stop movement. The second function of the extension-damper is to dampen and absorb the energy of the lid's movement when inadvertently tying to close when the safety device is enabled in the down position. Other features and their advantages will be apparent to those skilled in the art of lid supports from a careful reading of the Detailed Description of Preferred Embodiments accompanied by the following drawings.











BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE SEVERAL VIEWS OF THE DRAWINGS




In the drawings,





FIG. 1

is a side cross-sectional view of a portion of a vehicle showing the lid area with the lid open and the device in place to secure the lid in that open position, according to a preferred embodiment of the present invention;





FIG. 2

shows a front view of the device after being swung into position and just before it contacts the extension-damper housed on the sill of the lid that will inhibit any further movement of the lid, according to a preferred embodiment of the present invention; and





FIG. 3

shows an expanded view of

FIG. 2

showing the friction bushings and holes of the support arm assembly





FIG. 4

shows a front view of the device in the storage position on the vehicles support arm.











DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION




The present invention is a device for use in securing a lid in an open position. Most lids use either springs or pistons as dual-purpose devices to keep the lids open and secondarily as an aid in closing. One part of the lid assembly is connected to the lid by one end of a support arm and the other part, the body of the vehicle, is connected to the other end of the lid support arm. When a lid is opened the springs or pistons supply the energy to keep the lid from closing and when the lid is to be closed the energy in the springs or pistons releases this energy aiding the closing. For simplicity in this description, however, it will be assumed that lid is synonymous with hood or trunk and the present device would operate in the same fashion as described.





FIG. 1

shows the rear portion of a vehicle generally indicated with reference number


10


vehicle


10


has a body


12


and a lid


14


, here shown in an open position. The rear, or front, of the vehicle is indicated by reference number


16


and lid sill by reference number


25


and the lids support arm


28


. Device


20


according to a preferred embodiment of the present invention is shown holding lid


14


in the open position. Device


20


comprises a ␣ formed rod


26


having, in this embodiment, one section threaded through holes in the lids support arm assembly, a damper-extension


18


, two force distribution boots


29


, and two friction fittings


27


. To keep the lid in an open position the ␣ formed rod


26


is swung down into contact with damper-extension


18


which is secured in the lids sill


25


.




When it is desired to close the lid the ␣ formed rod


26


is swung up into a storage position adjacent to the lids support arm as indicated in FIG.


4


and secured there by frictional forces supplied by two friction fittings


27


.




There are, of course, numerous ways of implementing the ␣ formed rod and associated components. These include springs, cams, detent mechanisms, locks, nuts, various other forms of rods, and numerous other devices. Therefore, the present invention is not limited to the embodiment shown, but includes any mechanism for fixing the position of a rod, tube, or likeable member from a support arm assembly to any part vehicle that would constrain the movement of a lid.





FIG. 2

illustrates details of device


20


, namely, a ␣ formed rod


26


having, in this embodiment, one section threaded through holes in the lids support arm assembly, a damper-extension


18


, two force distribution boots


29


, and two friction fittings


27


. When the ␣ formed rod


26


, as shown, has been swung down into position it makes contact with damper-extension


18


, that is secured to the vehicles body sill


25


, via two force distribution boots


29


thereby constraining any further movement of the lid.





FIG. 3

illustrates another detail of device


20


, namely, a ␣ formed rod


26


having, in this embodiment, one section threaded through holes in the lids support arm assembly, the second being two friction fittings


27


that provide the isolation of the ␣ formed rod


26


from the holes in the support arm assembly


28


and provide the frictional forces to keep the ␣ formed rod


26


in the up position for storage as shown in FIG.


4


.





FIG. 4

illustrates details of device


20


, namely, a ␣ formed rod


26


having, in this embodiment, one section threaded through holes in the lids support arm assembly, a damper-extension


18


, two force distribution boots


29


, and two friction fittings


27


. When the ␣ formed rod


26


, as shown, has been swung up into storage position it is secured in this position by two friction fittings


27


.




To use device


20


as a safety protection device to prevent the inadvertent closing of a lid swing down ␣ formed rod


26


as shown in

FIG. 2

into position where it makes contact with damper-extension


18


, that is secured to the vehicles body sill


25


, via two force distribution boots


29


and thereby constrains any further movement of the lid.




Device


20


's ␣ formed rod


26


is preferably made of metal, but for most vehicles, any reasonably rigid material will do, including some plastics such as nylon and composites such as graphite or fiberglass impregnated polymers. Additionally, device


20


's damper-extension


18


, force distribution boots


29


, and friction fittings


27


are preferably made of rubber but for most vehicles, any reasonably resilient material will do, including some plastics such as nylon and composites such as graphite or fiberglass impregnated polymers. It is readily apparent to those skilled in the art of lid supports from reading the foregoing that many substitutions and modifications may be made to the preferred embodiments described without departing from the spirit and scope of the present invention.



Claims
  • 1. A device for holding a trunk or hood lid of a vehicle having a lid retention assembly comprised of springs, rods or pistons in an open position, said device comprising of:A U-shaped formed rod having a first leg with a first free end, said first free end being fitted with a first force distribution boot, said formed rod having a second leg with a second free end, said second free end fitted with a second force distribution boot; said first leg having a first fixed end attached to a first side of a medial portion, and said second leg having a second fixed end attached to a second side of said medial portion opposite said first side; said medial portion extending substantially perpendicularly to the longitudinal axes of said first and second legs; said U-shaped formed rod being inserted through a pair of friction fittings inserted into first and second holes so that said rod is pivotally attached a vehicle lid hinge arm; said first hole being located on one surface of said vehicle lid hinge arm, and said second hole being located on an opposing surface of said vehicle lid hinge arm such that said medial portion extends through said friction fittings and said first and second holes; wherein said U-shaped formed rod is manually movable into a lowered position, such that said first and second force distribution boots make contact with a damper-extension that is mounted on a sill portion of said vehicle frame opposite said vehicle lid, thus prohibiting movement of said lid.
  • 2. The device as recited in claim 1, further comprising two friction fittings as a means for retaining the formed rod in a storage position and providing mechanical isolation of said rod through a pair of holes with one hole on one side of a lid's support arm of the vehicle with said other hole being on the opposite side of said lid support arm.
  • 3. The device as recited in claim 1, wherein said friction fittings being comprised of molded material fitted into said holes in the lids support arms with material being sufficient to provide frictional forces necessary to retain the formed rod in a storage position and provide mechanical isolation of said formed rod from vehicles support arms.
  • 4. The device as recited in claim 1, further comprising two force distribution boots as a means of distributing lid closing forces on the damper-extension assembly and providing frictional forces to prevent movement of the formed rod on the damper-extension assembly.
  • 5. The device as recited in claim 1, wherein said force distribution boots comprised of force resilient material with a coefficient of friction sufficient to prevent slipping of the formed rod on the damper-extension assembly and molded to fit the ends of the said formed rod.
  • 6. The device as recited in claim 1, further comprising a damper-extension as a means for adjusting the height of the lid at which the protection is enabled and providing damping to remove excess energy from the formed rod.
  • 7. The device as recited in claim 1, wherein said damper-extension comprises:a molded assembly comprised of a force resilient material with a coefficient of friction sufficient to prevent slipping of the formed rod on the damper-extension assembly having dimensions appropriate to accommodate filling the sill space necessary to disable lid movement when said formed rod device is in contact with said damper-extension.
US Referenced Citations (25)
Number Name Date Kind
1324435 Scotford Dec 1919 A
2125247 Roethel Jul 1938 A
2126579 Roethel Aug 1938 A
2707064 Castello Apr 1955 A
3180668 Brown Apr 1965 A
4291501 Steinberg et al. Sep 1981 A
4419789 Matsui et al. Dec 1983 A
4460105 Cox Jul 1984 A
4524496 Tehsildar et al. Jun 1985 A
4771505 Dilich Sep 1988 A
4811440 Scott Mar 1989 A
4925230 Shelton May 1990 A
5029941 Twisselmann Jul 1991 A
5244273 Kaspar et al. Sep 1993 A
5358225 Volpel et al. Oct 1994 A
5516168 Tomaszewski-Link May 1996 A
5551738 Thorlton Sep 1996 A
5570493 Gulick Nov 1996 A
5784968 MacDonnell Jul 1998 A
5862570 Lezuch et al. Jan 1999 A
6048005 Rotondi Apr 2000 A
6086958 Russell et al. Jul 2000 A
6209932 Jung et al. Apr 2001 B1
6428062 Roehl Aug 2002 B1
20020000022 Schillaci et al. Jan 2002 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (1)
Number Date Country
03115681 May 1991 JP