This invention relates to safety doors and more particularly to doors that resist forced entry from outside such as for example by forcing a deadbolt that is holding the door to the doorway frame to release or forcing the hinges from the door or doorway frame.
It is known to utilize multiple spaced apart deadbolts that resist forcible entry. This prior art technique has several disadvantages, such as for example: (1) the deadbolts only protrude a short distance into the frame of the door and thus can be forced free; (2) it is time consuming and inconvenient to individually move the deadbolts into place; and (3) the hinges can be forced out of the frame or the center of the door can be broken into such as by an axe.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,911,763 discloses a central actuator that moves a plurality of deadbolts into place at spaced apart locations around the periphery of the door through individual linkages, thus reducing the inconvenience of moving individual deadbolts into place one at a time. However, the lock disclosed in this patent relies upon linkages near the deadbolts at the periphery of the door that activate the three individual deadbolts and the deadbolts have only a short length within the door. It has several disadvantages, such as: (1) there are no deadbolts on the hinge side of the door so there are only a few short screws holding this side of the door in place against an impact that may pull the screws holding the hinges free; and (2) each of the linkage mechanisms includes three pivot points from the central actuator and provides little support for the door itself. Thus, in the case of some doors, an axe may be used to break the door itself.
It is known to use bars mountable on the inside of the door and held at several locations so that they extend across the door. While these bars provide overall strength, it is time consuming to put them in place and remove them when locking or unlocking the door. Moreover, they are unsightly.
Accordingly, it is an object of the invention to provide a novel safety door.
It is a further object of the invention to provide a novel method for securing a door.
It is a further object of the invention to provide a novel door that resists forced entry from impact such as kicking, hitting with a sledge hammer or prying with crowbars or the like.
It is a still object of the invention to provide a door that resists entry by cutting or penetrating means such as saws and blowtorches and the like.
It is a still further object of the invention to provide a novel door with sufficient strength to resist entry over the entire entrance and yet may be opened and closed in a normal manner.
It is a still further object of the invention to provide a novel safety door without excessive external appliances such as extra cages or bars or the like that must be individually placed to prevent easy entry.
It is a still farther object of the invention to provide a relatively inexpensive yet strong safety door.
It is a still further object of the invention to provide a safety door that can be tailored to the needs in terms of strength and ability to easily lock and unlock it.
In accordance with the above and further objects of the invention, the safety door includes a central actuator and a plurality of bars extending substantially radially from the centrally located actuator sufficiently far to protrude into the frame of the door. In the preferred embodiment, the centrally located actuator is substantially cylindrical and rotatably mounted to a central location on the door. It pivotably receives one end portion of each of the bars at spaced apart locations. A turn of the centrally located actuator through a relatively short number of degrees forces the bars into the frame or withdraws them from the frame of the door. There are at least four radially extending bars and preferably six radially extending bars relatively evenly annularly spaced about the centrally located actuator so that substantially the entire door is reinforced by the bars and the bars extend a substantial distance into the doorway frame.
The door itself may be fabricated of any of several different materials including metal with a fire-resistant internal filling or a wooden frame with an internal powder filling or be entirely wooden. It has been found that it is most economical for the door to contain a large percentage of wood because this slows steel cutting saws. The door should also be sufficiently solid to support the centrally-located actuator and the radially-extending bars. For this purpose, the core of the door must be capable of being drilled and routered at least over a substantial area to allow placement of the component parts of the actuator and bars. One of the less expensive types of such doors is a frame filled with pressed wood particles. Cores of wood are hereinafter at times referred to as wooden door cores.
In fabricating the door, the door may be placed horizontally on a surface such as a table top. Drills on runners may be attached to the table or other surface and then caused to drill holes radially inwardly for the bars. At a central location where the drilled holes meet, an opening must be drilled through the plane of the door to support the rotatably mounted actuator on the inside of the door. In the preferred embodiment, the bars are internal to the door but it is possible to mount them externally by other slidable means on the inside of the door. However, in the preferred embodiment, access to the locking mechanism is provided only from inside the door and not from the external side. The openings for the bars can be accomplished with a router by forming the radial slots or by drilling. They should be slightly larger in at least one radial direction than the bars since they will move laterally to a slight extent as well as radially.
In the preferred embodiment, the central actuator is wheel-shaped and includes circumferentially spaced-apart metal pins perpendicular to the plane of the door. Each of the pins connects the opening in an end portion of a corresponding rod to a circumferentially spaced pin opening in the actuator. Preferably, there are four or more such pins and six or more rods. The radial movement of the pins with the centrally located actuator moves the rods outwardly and inwardly. The end plate on the wheel conceals the pins and the end connections in the preferred embodiment. In one embodiment, a handle is provided to actuate the wheel from the outside. The handle may contain a lock or may be removable to provide security.
Two problems had to be solved to provide an easy to use, adaptable safety door.
Firstly, because the bars that serve as deadbolts and reinforcement for the door are actuated by a rotary actuator, they move both longitudinally and at an angle to their longitudinal axes within a solid door in a plane parallel to the doorway. Thus the door must include unsymmetrical openings in the door, door frame and floor with space at an angle to the longitudinal axes of the rods within a plane parallel to the doorway to permit movement of the bars. Secondly, the actuator must be easily rotated by hand even though it may move several long bars along frictional paths in some applications. Once these two unobvious problems were appreciated, they were solved by designing the safety door so that a minor amount of rotation in degrees would move a sufficient number of bars a sufficient distance into the doorway frame and/or floor to provide the required strength and an adequate mechanical advantage was obtained by proper selection of the actuator diameters. The diameters are the diameter of the circle of rotation of the handle of the actuator and the circle of rotation of the driving element for the bars.
From the above summary, it can be understood that the safety door and method of securing a door of this invention has several advantages, such as: (1) it has overall strength so as to resist battering by any mechanisms at any place; (2) it is difficult to locate and to break the points of attachment of the door and the frame; (3) the points of attachment and reinforcement are throughout the periphery of the door and within the overall area of the door so as to provide relatively few weak portions; (4) it is easy to operate the door in a normal manner; and (5) the door is relatively inexpensive. Even with cutting the rods, the locking arms will extend into the frame, thus preventing opening.
The above noted and other features of the invention will be better understood from the following detailed description when considered in connection with the accompanying drawings in which:
In
When the door 12 is closed, the bars 26A-26F resist the forcing of the door open. For this purpose, the bars have a thickness of at least 6 mm in their thickest dimension at an angle to their longitudinal axes, have a modulus of elasticity of at least 5,000,000 psi, and a yield point of at least 1,000 psi. In the preferred embodiment, they are solid aluminum cylindrical bars having a diameter of 12 mm but may be of many other materials and sizes. In the preferred embodiment, there are six rods although there may be between four and ten rods. With this arrangement, it is difficult to batter the door down. It can be secured from inside the building by simple rotation of the actuator 24 in one direction and can be placed in a rest condition where the door can be opened by simple rotation in the other direction of less than 90 degrees. In the preferred embodiment, the rotation is between 5 and 40 degrees. In most designs for doors, the rotation needed to insert the bars one inch into the doorway frame and a joist 58 in the floor is approximately 13 degrees and the angle increases in a manner substantially but not exactly proportionally to the distance.
In
The rods 26A-26F (only rods 26A, 26C, 26F and 26E being shown in
The ease of rotating the actuator 24 is reduced by the length of the rods and the number of the rods and increased by any mechanical advantage provided. The mechanical advantage is: (1) increased by the ratio of the distance of the handle 31 from the center of rotation to the distance of the ends of the rods 26A-26F from the center of rotation; (2) reduced by the sine of the angle between the rods 26A-26F and the radius of the center of rotation of the posts 34A-34F; and (3) increased proportionally to the diameter of the circle of rotation of the posts 34A-34F.
In
In
In
In
In
In
In
As best shown in
In
In
In operation, the safety door 12 is secured against battering or breaking to gain entrance to a room by turning the actuator 24 in a first direction and unlocked by turning it in the opposite or second direction. Turning the actuator 24 in the first direction moves the bars 26A-26F in a radially outward direction from their central location around the actuator 24 a sufficient distance so that their ends (herein sometimes referred to a second ends) extend into the doorway frame 14 far enough to prevent the door from being forcibly dislodged from the frame of the doorway. When locked, the safety door 12 resists breaking or cutting to gain entrance into a room. Turning the actuator in the second direction retracts the ends of the rods 26A-26F from the doorway frame 14 and permits the door to be opened by swinging it on its hinges 18A-18C such as by the door knob 22. In this specification, the floor including the joist 58 at the bottom of the doorway is considered part of the doorway frame 14. The bars 26A-26F extend at least one inch but preferably 1½ inches or more into the doorway frame 14 at six spaced apart locations on the door and extend all the way to a common point at an actuator 24 at the center so as to perform reinforcement throughout the door.
To permit the easy turning of the actuator 24 by hand to lock or unlock the door 12, the actuator 24 is pivotally pinned to the door 12 by the pin 28 (
The handle is spaced at a sufficient distance from the pin 28 about which it and the rods 26A-26F rotate to provide enough mechanical advantage for easy turning against the resistance to motion of the bars. The larger the number of bars and the greater the length, the greater the resistance and the larger the distance between the pin 28 and the handle 31 to which force is applied to lock or unlock the safety door 12. The mechanical advantage is the ratio between a first distance, which is the distance between the handle 31 and the pin 28, and a second distance which is the effective distance between the points at which the inner ends of the bars 26A-26F are attached to the posts 34A-34F. In the preferred embodiment, the bars 26A-26F are all pivoted about points that are at the same distance from the pin 28 and so the effective distance is the actual distance. However, in this specification, the effective distance is that distance that would provide the same mechanical advantage if the distances were all the same and the resistance to motion provided by each bar is the same. If the resistance provided by each bar is the same, the effective distance is generally the average distance.
In the preferred embodiment, the actuator 24 is rotated through 15 degrees in a first direction to lock the door and 15 degrees in the opposite direction to unlock the door. However, it may be designed for different amounts of rotation depending on the distance into the doorway frame the rods 26A-26F are to extend and the diameter of the rotary member. In one embodiment, the door is only locked and unlocked from inside. However, in other embodiments, a key 38 with a hollow specific shape on its outer end may be inserted through the door into a special pin 28A with a correspondingly shaped end so as to move the actuator 24 from outside the door. The pin is fastened to the plates 30 and 32 for movement therewith.
Although a preferred embodiment of the invention has been described with some particularity, many modifications and variations in the invention are possible in the light of the above teachings. Therefore, it is to be understood, that, within the scope of the appended claims, the invention may be practiced other than as specifically described.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1366015 | Morris | Jan 1921 | A |
2460961 | Wilson | Feb 1949 | A |
2921461 | Schlage | Jan 1960 | A |
2947160 | Wolters | Aug 1960 | A |
4046410 | Connell | Sep 1977 | A |
4288944 | Donovan | Sep 1981 | A |
4306432 | Ravid | Dec 1981 | A |
4362328 | Tacheny et al. | Dec 1982 | A |
4754715 | Squires | Jul 1988 | A |
4757715 | Miwa et al. | Jul 1988 | A |
5077992 | Su | Jan 1992 | A |
5094483 | James | Mar 1992 | A |
5110164 | Whiteman et al. | May 1992 | A |
5472246 | Puric | Dec 1995 | A |
5498038 | Simon et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5595076 | Weinerman et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5603234 | Lozier et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
7387076 | Bauman et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
276634 | May 1928 | GB |
1 563 393 | Mar 1980 | GB |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20080157541 A1 | Jul 2008 | US |