Patent Application
20160345651
Not applicable
Not applicable
1. Field of Invention
This invention relates to wearable protective equipment, specifically to helmets and other shells intended to reduce the effect of impacts.
2. Prior Art
Helmets are known to have existed for almost 3000 years. Originally they were made of bronze, iron and leather to protect soldiers in battle. Over time, they evolved to protect people in a variety of fields, including construction, firefighting, and a variety of sports. In each application, designers have had to meet specific demands, but the general goal has always been to protect the head against blunt or pointed impacts.
In the past century, helmets have seen improvements in weight and comfort through the addition of various plastics, foams, and advanced manufacturing techniques. These began with the first plastic football helmet patented by John T. Riddell and his son John T. Riddell Jr. in 1940, U.S. Pat. No. 2,293,308. The advances continued in the development of highly specialized helmets for applications including, batting, cricket, bicycle, rock climbing, motorcycle, and car racing.
“The Highway Safety Act of 1966” required states to enact helmet use laws in order to qualify for certain federal safety programs and highway construction funds. By the early 1970s, almost all the states had universal motorcycle helmet laws.
Because of the precedent set with The Highway Safety Act of 1966, the “Children's Bicycle Helmet Safety Act of 1994” made bicycle safety helmet laws voluntary and incentivized grants to States and nonprofit organizations for programs that require or encourage individuals under the age of 16 to wear approved bicycle helmets.
Currently, 21 states, the District of Columbia, the Northern Mariana Islands and the Virgin Islands have a helmet law for bicyclists below a certain age, generally about 16. Only the Virgin Islands require helmets for all bicyclists and 29 states and Guam have no bicycle helmet law.
The state laws, and the accepted helmet testing standards of bicycle helmets for those laws vary depending on when they laws and standards were written because of evolution of the testing standards themselves.
The Snell Foundation had introduced the first bicycle helmet standard in the United States in 1970, but at the time only a light motorcycle helmet could pass the standard, and that meant an unusually heavy helmet for the application of bicycle riding. In 1984 the ANSI (American National Standards Institute) headgear committee adopted ANSI Z80.4, the first workable bike helmet standard for the United States. The Snell Foundation revised their own standard the next year to adjust the requirements to more realistic levels for bicycle riding impacts. By the mid 1980's, bicycle helmets were characterized generally by EPS (expanded polystyrene) hard foam liners, with ABS (acrylonitrile butadiene styrene) or polycarbonate hard shells, and then eventually in the early 1990's, a simple vacuum formed PVC (polyvinyl chloride) shell for decoration over the expanded polystyrene hard foam.
Around the same time, a more ridged, rounded construction utilizing an expanded polystyrene liner and a hard plastic ABS (acrylonitrile butadiene styrene) outer shell, commonly known as a “skate helmet”, was introduced and widely accepted for more extreme activities.
In 1998, the Consumer Products Safety Commission (CPSC) introduced standard 16 CFR Part 1203 that is the safety standard that all bicycle helmets must meet if sold in the United States, and the same safety standard most adopted by many states for their helmet laws. Although some states still refer to older ANSI and ASTM standards, depending on when those laws were written, CPSC CFR Part 1203 is a standard that requires a single impact testing protocol where the helmet must be discarded after one single impact.
The late 1990's saw a rise in extreme sports and included activities such as in-line roller skating, trick skating and skateboarding. To answer these more rigorous demands for helmet protection standards, ASTM International, formerly American Society for Testing and Materials, issued the ASTM F1492 skate helmet standard in the early 2000's, and is a multiple impact standard to reflect the more extreme activities the product is used for.
Because many state laws are antiquated and do not reflect the newer ASTM F1492 multiple impact certification for extreme sport helmets, many of these products are sold under the older CPSC CFR Part 1203 single impact bicycle helmet standard.
In an effort to provide a duel certified (CPSC CFR Part 1203 and ASTM F1492) skate helmet design, I, Paul Dvorak reconfigured the expanded polystyrene hard foam inside liner of a skate helmet design in the form of corrugation with a simple peaks and valleys. Independent testing reports demonstrated a measurable decrease in the amount of G force (A force acting on a body as a result of acceleration or gravity, informally described in units of acceleration equal to one g) passing through the helmet and allowing the helmet to pass both standards.
In order to both remove expanded polystyrene and other materials in the manufacture of all types of safety and sports helmets, and increase the amount of protection for the users head, Safety Helmet Liner Impact Reducing Technology was developed.
In accordance with at least one embodiment, an article of headwear comprises an inner liner and an outward layer of corrugated material. Upon impact, the outward layer at least partially collapses, and in so doing absorbs and distributes the forces of the impact.
The present invention addresses and solves the shortcomings of single-impact rated helmets. It provides for the long-term safety of the wearer, without a need for specialized inspection equipment. The invention provides ease of manufacture, by orienting corrugations to allow for fabrication on a single-piece mold.
In the following descriptions, like reference characters designate like or corresponding parts throughout the several views and embodiments. Also, it is to be understood that such terms as “forward,” “rearward,” “left,” “right,” “upwardly,” “downwardly,” and the like are words of convenience and are not to be construed as limiting terms. Locations, shapes, sizes, materials, numbers, relative positions, angular positions, velocities of motion, ranges of motion, electrical tolerances, mechanical tolerances, and other such properties of the devices within the embodiments may be altered and are not to be construed as limiting factors. Nor should the components comprising an assembly be construed as the only suggested components within that assembly.
Referring now to the drawings, it will be understood that the illustrations are for the purpose of describing embodiments of the invention and are not intended to limit the invention thereto.
The operation of these embodiments begins at the instant of impact between the helmet and another object, such as the ground or a projectile. At that moment, the outer shell 26, if one exists, begins to deform and transfer mechanical energy to the nearby apexes 32. If there is no outer shell, then the mechanical energy is transferred directly from the projectile or other object to the apexes 32. The legs 30 begin to bow inward or outward as the apex collapses partially or completely to the plane of the base 28.
Thus the reader will see that at least two embodiments of the present invention provide articles of headwear which absorb multiple impacts without damage to the headwear itself. These embodiments allow a small, lightweight helmet to perform comparably to a larger, heavier one, and they provide a simple method of manufacture.
While the above description contains many specifics, these should not be construed as limitations on the scope of the invention, but rather as exemplifications of two embodiments thereof. Many other variations are possible. For example:
Accordingly, the scope of the invention should be determined not by the embodiments illustrated, but by the appended claims and their legal equivalents.
This application claims the benefit of PPA Ser. Nr. U.S. patent application Ser. No. 61/997,222, filed 2014 May 27 by the present inventor, which is incorporated by reference.
