This disclosure generally relates to a fuel dispensing nozzle, and more particularly, to a fuel dispensing nozzle incorporating a safety feature that shuts off the flow of fuel when the nozzle is removed from the fill pipe or neck of a vehicle. Another significant feature of the concept of this invention is to provide for a reduction in the amount of force necessary for the application of the nozzle within a vehicle for refueling.
Gasoline fuel dispensing nozzles are used to control the flow of fuel, such as gasoline or gasoline blended with ethanol, from a storage tank through a fill pipe into a gasoline tank in a vehicle. In order to facilitate the rapid and efficient dispensing of the fuel from a storage tank to a user tank, fuel dispensing systems are designed to operate at a very high fluid flow rate. The fuel is pumped from the storage tank and through a dispensing metering system that tracks and records the amount of fuel dispensed by each user. The fuel then flows through a fuel line from the metering system to a dispensing nozzle that is placed in a fuel inlet or fuel filler neck attached to the user tank to enable the dispensing of fuel from the storage tank into the user tank.
The dispensing nozzle that is used to dispense fuel may have a safety interlock mechanism incorporated therein. The safety interlock mechanism will immediately stop the flow of gasoline if the fuel dispensing nozzle is accidentally removed from the fill neck prior to the tank being full. The nozzle may contain a bellows device that is placed over a spout that is inserted into the fill neck. By placing the spout into the fill neck a force is exerted on the bellows device that moves the bellows device to initiate operation of the interlock mechanism. Removal of the spout prior to the tank being full releases the force on the bellows device and operates the interlock mechanism to shutoff fuel flow. The bellows device is constructed of a hard material that requires a large force to move the bellows device to operate the interlock mechanism. The force that is required is so large that elderly individuals find it difficult to use the nozzle to refuel a vehicle. To complicate matters, the force required to engage the interlock mechanism increases at lower temperatures. Thus, bellows type devices are perceived as being difficult to operate, large, heavy, and bulky. As known, the bellows style of balanced pressure fuel dispensing is used to provide a return of vapors back to the underground storage tank, primarily through the pressure that builds up within the fuel tank as gasoline is being dispensed therein. That pressure returns the vapors back through the bellows, its nozzle, and the dispenser to the underground storage tank.
Further, some governmental regulatory agencies require that a nozzle have a vapor recovery system integrated with the nozzle so that any vapors inside the fuel tank of the vehicle are allowed to flow back through the nozzle and into an underground storage tank. Such nozzles, in order to comply with various regulations, must function to shutoff both fuel delivery and provide vapor recovery during refueling and in the event that the nozzle is inadvertently removed from a fill pipe of a vehicle. However, due to recent regulations, nozzles having vapor recovery systems are being phased out. Also, due to a large number of new vehicles being equipped with on-board refueling vapor recovery systems (ORVR), the extra level of safety gained from vapor recovery interlock nozzles will be reduced. Therefore, there is the potential for nozzle manufacturers to produce nozzles which do not have expensive vapor recovery interlock systems incorporated therein.
The present disclosure is designed to obviate and overcome many of the disadvantages and shortcomings experienced with prior nozzles having a safety interlock mechanism for dispensing fuel. Moreover, the present disclosure is related to a safety interlock nozzle that is designed and constructed to be easier to operate, from a force standpoint, than prior nozzles having a safety interlock mechanism. The present disclosure utilizes different structure, to assure that the nozzle always remains off, until such time as the spout is properly and conveniently located within the fill pipe of the vehicle, before the fuel can be dispensed. The present disclosure further provides different structure to immediately shutoff fuel flow if the nozzle is inadvertently, accidentally, untimely, or even negligently removed from the fill pipe of the vehicle before the tank is full.
The present disclosure is a safety interlock nozzle for use with a safety interlock mechanism which incorporates structure that forms a base having an interlock contact surface at a first end and alternating tabs at a second end, a body having alternating tabs at a first end that mate with the alternating tabs of the base, a channel within the body positioned at a second end, a ring clamp for connecting the tabs of the base to the tabs of the body, a splash guard have a first end for contacting with a filler neck housing of a second end having a slot formed therein, the second end capable of fitting within the channel of the second end of the body, and a spring for being captured within the channel in the body and the slot within the splash guard, the spring for connecting the splash guard to the body.
Another unique aspect of this invention is that the splash guard of the body has at least a compound surface, which could even be an arcuate surface, and which provides a centralized line of contact with the fill pipe of the vehicle, so that there is simply a line of contact, and not an entire surface area, which has been found to substantially reduce the force necessary to contract the body within the base, in telescoping fashion, as the nozzle and these structural components are inserted into the vehicle fill pipe, in preparation for a refueling of the vehicle. As previously stated, it is the desire to obtain through the usage of this invention a force of less than 5 lbs. pressure, to contract the nozzle when it is inserted into the vehicle fill pipe, and through that maneuver disengage the automatic shutoff valve, to allow for its operations, during the fueling of a vehicle, as known in the art. This feature of disengaging the automatic shutoff mechanism of the nozzle, to achieve refueling, has generally been described in the previous U.S. Pat. No. 7,406,988, owned by a common assignee.
In another form of the present disclosure, a safety interlock nozzle for use with a safety interlock mechanism comprises a base having an interlock contact surface at a first end and alternating tabs at a second end, a body having alternating tabs at a first end that mate with the alternating tabs of the base, a channel within the body positioned at a second end, a ring clamp for connecting the tabs of the base to the tabs of the body, a splash guard having a first end for contacting with a filler neck housing of a vehicle, a second annular end having a slot formed therein, the second end capable of fitting within the channel of the second end of the body, and a spacer ring formed integrally within the second end for receiving and generally centering the spout there through, and a spring for being captured within the channel in the body and the slot within the splash guard, the spring for connecting the splash guard to the body.
In yet another form of the present disclosure, a safety interlock nozzle for use with a safety interlock mechanism is disclosed which comprises a base having an interlock contact surface at a first end and alternating tabs at a second end, a body having alternating tabs at a first end that mate with the alternating tabs of the base, a channel within the body positioned at a second end, a ring clamp for connecting the tabs of the base to the tabs of the body, a splash guard having a first end for contacting with a filler neck housing of a vehicle, a second end having a slot formed therein, the second end capable of fitting within the channel of the second end of the body, an exterior surface having an upper friction bearing surface and a lower friction bearing surface, and a spring for being captured within the channel in the body and the slot within the splash guard, the spring for connecting the splash guard to the body.
The present disclosure is directed to a safety interlock nozzle that has a safety interlock mechanism that can be actuated by the application of a low level of force. The low level of force may be the application below a maximum of five lbs.
The present disclosure provides a safety interlock nozzle that is simple to operate and provides highly reliable results to dispense fuel at a rapid flow rate.
The present disclosure provides a safety interlock nozzle that has a straight telescoping interlock assembly instead of a compressible bellows design.
The present disclosure is also directed to a safety interlock nozzle that may be constructed of a material or materials that can transfer a force or a load in an axial direction independent of operating temperatures.
The present disclosure further provides a safety interlock nozzle that is compatible with, and can be readily incorporated into, existing dispensing nozzles, without the need to reconfigure or modify the existing nozzle design.
The present disclosure provides a safety interlock nozzle that has a safety interlock assembly that is easy to remove from the nozzle for service or replacement.
These and other advantages of the present disclosure will become more apparent to those skilled in the art after considering the following detailed specification in conjunction with the accompanying drawings.
In referring to the drawings:
Referring now to the drawings, wherein like numbers refer to like items, number 10 identifies a preferred embodiment of a safety interlock nozzle constructed according to the present disclosure. With reference now to
Referring now to
The splash guard 24 also has an internal spacer ring 56 incorporated therein. The spacer ring 56 is used to reduce or eliminate looseness and rattling between the spout 18 and the interlock assembly 22 once the interlock assembly 22 is connected to the nozzle body 12. The spacer ring 56 is integral with the splash guard 24 and is generally circular in shape. This spacer ring helps to center the nozzle spout within the assembly. The spacer ring 56 also acts as a guide to assist in keeping the direction of the actuation force along a center line of the spout 18.
As can be noted in
The assembly 22 is also shown having the ring clamp 30 being used to secure the body portion 26 to the base portion 28 by fitting into the tabs 40 and 42. The base portion 28 also has the interlock pin contact surface 44 that is used to engage a pin or a rod member (not shown) to control an automatic shutoff (not shown) within the nozzle 10 that is used to curtail the flow of fuel. Movement of the pin or rod member operates or sets the shutoff which will also allow the nozzle to be operated. Further, if the pin or rod member is operated again, which correlates to the nozzle 10 being removed prior to the tank being filled, and then the valve will operate to immediately stop the flow of fuel through the nozzle 10.
With particular reference now to
Thus, as can be determined, when the nozzle 10 is not being used, and the assembly 22 is at its steady state condition, the assembly 22 is shifted forwardly of the spout 18, allowing the contact surface 44 to be shifted forwardly and not in contact with a safety interlock mechanism within the nozzle 10. Under this circumstance, the automatic shutoff is disengaged and the handle 32 cannot be squeezed or maneuvered to the on position. However, when the nozzle 10 is applied into the fill pipe housing 36 of an automobile, or any vehicle, or even a container, the splash guard 24, the body 26, the base 28, and the contact surface 44 will be compressed rearward. Normally the spout of the nozzle will be retained within the fill pipe when inserted. Due to the pressure exerted upon the assembly 22, the contact surface 44 will force the safety interlock mechanism of the shutoff within the nozzle 10 into engagement. When this occurs, the handle 32 may be operated to allow for the initiation of fluid flow. Operation of the handle 32 will open a poppet mechanism (not shown) within the nozzle 10 to allow fluid, such as gasoline, to flow through the nozzle 10, and be dispensed into the gasoline tank of the vehicle in which the nozzle 10 is inserted. During the fueling operation if the nozzle 10 is removed from the housing 36, the force or pressure exerted on the assembly 22 will be removed which will cause the contact surface 44 to move forward. This will operate the safety interlock mechanism and immediately shutoff the nozzle 10 and the flow of fuel through the nozzle 10. Such an interlock is shown in the Company's U.S. Pat. No. 7,406,988.
From all that has been said, it will be clear that there has thus been shown and described herein a safety interlock nozzle. It will become apparent to those skilled in the art, however, that many changes, modifications, variations, and other uses and applications of the subject safety interlock nozzle are possible and contemplated. All changes, modifications, variations, and other uses and applications which do not depart from the spirit and scope of the disclosure are deemed to be covered by the disclosure, which is limited only by the claims which follow.
This non-provisional patent application claims priority to the provisional application having Ser. No. 61/966,146, filed on Feb. 18, 2014.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1938479 | Baker | Dec 1933 | A |
3502121 | Moore et al. | Mar 1970 | A |
3719215 | Murray | Mar 1973 | A |
3982571 | Fenton et al. | Sep 1976 | A |
4060110 | Bower | Nov 1977 | A |
4143689 | Conley et al. | Mar 1979 | A |
D261674 | Nice | Nov 1981 | S |
4557302 | Sunderhaus | Dec 1985 | A |
4697624 | Bower et al. | Oct 1987 | A |
D293462 | Bower et al. | Dec 1987 | S |
5000360 | Lown et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
5067639 | Maguire et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
5085258 | Fink, Jr. | Feb 1992 | A |
5121777 | Leininger et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5390712 | Parrish et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5417259 | Schneider | May 1995 | A |
5469900 | Weeks et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5645116 | McDonald | Jul 1997 | A |
5713401 | Weeks | Feb 1998 | A |
D420364 | Fischer et al. | Feb 2000 | S |
7406988 | Mitchell | Aug 2008 | B2 |
8066037 | Lawrence et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
D668953 | Maxwell | Oct 2012 | S |
8800611 | Tsiberidis | Aug 2014 | B2 |
D719826 | Burnside | Dec 2014 | S |
8997804 | Grantham | Apr 2015 | B2 |
D739442 | Schroeder et al. | Sep 2015 | S |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150232321 A1 | Aug 2015 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61966146 | Feb 2014 | US |