The invention relates to a safety key and locking cylinder, the locking cylinder having a stator and a rotor, with a front end and a rear end, and a keyway, and the safety key having a shank which is provided with a plurality of control surfaces for properly positioning tumblers and has a front end and a rear end. The invention also relates to a locking system with such safety keys and locking cylinders.
Safety keys and locking cylinders of the abovementioned type are known in numerous configurations. The essential factor for safety keys for high-grade systems is for there to be no possibility of straightforward copying on comparatively simple drilling and milling machines. A safety key which is difficult to copy may be achieved in accordance with the applicant's EP 0 621 384 B1 by the shank of the safety key being provided with a control element which is designed as a pin and is mounted in a displaceable manner in the shank. This control element can be properly positioned by an additional tumbler in the locking cylinder. Such a key cannot be copied with justifiable outlay. A so-called toothed key with a similar control element has been disclosed in EP 0 802 289. It is also ensured that this key is comparatively difficult to copy.
The abovementioned safety key is rendered disadvantageous by the costs which arise from the formation of the abovementioned control elements and from the additional tumblers in the locking cylinder. These control elements, in addition, may have an adverse effect on the combinatorics.
The object of the invention is to provide a safety key which is difficult to copy and, nevertheless, can be produced comparatively cost-effectively.
The object is achieved, in the case of a safety key of the generic type, in that, at its front end, the rotor is extended and has at least one further control surface, which interacts with a further control surface arranged at the rear end of the shank. In the case of the key according to the invention, the front extended end of the rotor and the rear end of the key shank are used for providing further control surfaces. These control surfaces may be produced particularly cost-effectively by depressions and in particular by slots in the extended front end of the rotor. On the safety key, the control surfaces may be created particularly cost-effectively by recesses and in particular milled cut-outs on shoulders of the key shank. The safety key may be a turning key with bores in the key shank or also some other safety key, for example a toothed key or cam key.
A significant advantage of the safety key according to the invention is that it is backward compatible. The safety key and the locking cylinder according to the invention can readily be integrated in an existing system. In the case of a system which is supplemented in this way, it is possible to have a general key which operates both the existing locking cylinders and the locking cylinders according to the invention. The existing safety keys, however, cannot open the corresponding new locking cylinders. It is thus possible for any existing locking system to be extended and enhanced. The additional control surface of the rear end of the shank results in comparatively high outlay being required for copying purposes, since additional and usually unavailable tools and special blanks are necessary.
A further advantage of the invention is also to be seen in the fact that the system design is simplified. In addition, the flexibility of such systems is increased and it is easily possible to form groups which do not effect the permutation. The invention benefits the combinatorics to a considerable extent and simplifies the subdivision of groups.
A particularly high level of security is achieved when, at the rear end of the shank, the safety key has at least one laterally projecting part which interacts with a control surface at the front end of the rotor. Such a projecting part is, for example, a lug which is difficult to copy but can be produced without significant further costs. The lug may be produced in different shapes and dimensions in a locking system in order to increase the number of locking arrangements.
Further advantageous features can be gathered from the following description and the drawing.
Exemplary embodiments of the invention are explained in more detail hereinbelow with reference to the drawing, in which:
a to 1c show, schematically, three-dimensional illustrations of safety keys according to the invention,
a to 2c show, schematically, three-dimensional views of rotors of locking cylinders according to the invention,
a to 3f show, schematically, front views of locking cylinders according to the invention, the stator having been left out in
a to 4d show schematic views of safety keys according to a variant,
a and 5b show, schematically, further views of a safety key according to the invention,
a to 7f show, schematically, front views of locking cylinders according to a variant,
a to 8f show, schematically, front views of locking cylinders according to a further variant,
a to 9h show, schematically, front views of locking cylinders according to a further variant.
a shows a safety key 1 which has a shank 6 and a grip 14. The key 1 is a so-called flat key or turning key. It is also possible, however, for the key to be a toothed key or cam key. The shank 6, in a manner known per se, has control bores 7, which are usually made in the broad sides and in the narrow sides of the shank 6. These control bores 7 serve for properly positioning tumblers (not shown here) which are known per se and belong to an associated locking cylinder 2, which, according to
The shank 6 of the key 1 has a front end 6a and a rear end 6b. By means of the front end 6a, the key 1 is introduced in the customary manner into a keyway 5 of the rotor 4. The abovementioned tumblers are properly positioned by virtue of the shank 6 being introduced into the keyway 5. As a result, the rotor 4 is unlocked and can be rotated by way of the grip 14 of the key for the purpose of actuating the lock.
At its rear end 6b, the key 1 has additional control surfaces 9, which are formed by laterally projecting shoulders 15 and recesses 13 in these shoulders 15. These control surfaces 9 interact with a corresponding control surface 8 of the rotor 4, which is depicted in
The key 1′ according to
Control surfaces 9″ of the key 1″ according to
a shows a key 20 with a projecting lug 12 arranged laterally on a shoulder 15 of the shank 6. The keys 20′, 20″ and 20′″, according to
a and 5b show a key 21 which has a lateral lug 12 but no shoulder 15. The shank 6′ of the key 21 nevertheless corresponds to the length of the shank 6. The key 21 can operate all the rotors 24, 24′ and 24″ since, in this case, the slots 10, 10′ and 10″ do not have any excluding function. The key 21 is thus a passe-partout for the lock cylinders 2 according to
d shows a central rotary locking cylinder 24′ which can be operated by all the keys 20 to 20′″ and by the passe-partout 21 and by a master key 22. This is ensured by the wide slot 10′″, which is the same width as the keyway 5. The control surface 18 on the base of the slot 10′″ is of a corresponding width.
e shows a blocking cylinder 24′″ which can be operated by the key 21 but not by the keys according to
a to 7f, 8a to 8f and 9a to 9h illustrate the large number of locking arrangements which can be formed by different recesses 27, 27′, 27″, 27′″, 27IV; 28, 28′, 28″; 29, 29′, 29″; 30, 30′, 30″, 30′″ and 31, 31′, 31″, 31′″ in the front end of the rotor 4 or 4′. The associated safety keys 1 and 1′ have corresponding control surfaces 9 and 12, which interact with the control surfaces of these recesses.
As can be seen, the invention allows the construction of locking systems with group and individual locking arrangements. Existing systems may be supplemented with corresponding rotors and keys. The production of extended-head rotors and keys with the abovementioned control surfaces and lugs 12 can be carried out comparatively cost-effectively. The slots and/or recesses in the extended head of the rotor can be varied in many different ways. Numerous variations of the control surfaces 9 and shoulders 15 and of the lug 12 are likewise possible.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1303/02 | Jul 2002 | CH | national |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
851008 | Jacobson et al. | Apr 1907 | A |
1130337 | Robb | Mar 1915 | A |
1163470 | Schoell | Dec 1915 | A |
1222545 | Gross | Apr 1917 | A |
1292104 | Scheidler | Jan 1919 | A |
1832498 | Muzzio | Nov 1931 | A |
1843335 | Oberfield | Feb 1932 | A |
1949406 | Beach et al. | Mar 1934 | A |
1979798 | Glidden | Nov 1934 | A |
2030837 | Full et al. | Feb 1936 | A |
2065294 | Simon | Dec 1936 | A |
2083859 | North | Jun 1937 | A |
2157142 | Olson | May 1939 | A |
2388227 | Heyer | Oct 1945 | A |
3780549 | Schlage | Dec 1973 | A |
3834198 | Wiczer | Sep 1974 | A |
3882702 | Wiczer | May 1975 | A |
3889501 | Fort | Jun 1975 | A |
4490998 | Wellekens | Jan 1985 | A |
4553452 | Keller | Nov 1985 | A |
4823575 | Florian et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
4901547 | Dal Palu' | Feb 1990 | A |
5073081 | Johnson | Dec 1991 | A |
5513509 | Bergen | May 1996 | A |
6058750 | Li | May 2000 | A |
6109081 | Dimig et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6119495 | Loreti | Sep 2000 | A |
6584819 | Hung | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6609402 | Blankenship et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6681609 | Preddey | Jan 2004 | B1 |
20040000178 | Tseng | Jan 2004 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
199 01 054 | Aug 1999 | DE |
0 128 475 | Jun 1984 | EP |
0 816 598 | Jan 1998 | EP |
0 802 289 | Jun 1999 | EP |
0 621 384 | Sep 1999 | EP |
2 356 016 | May 2001 | GB |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20040016273 A1 | Jan 2004 | US |