The present invention generally relates to dumpsters and, more particularly, relates to a safety locking device for dumpsters.
As is well known, refuse dumpsters for use in industrial applications typically include a container supported on a base structure. The container is often pivotable from a storage or upright position to a tilted or tilted dumping position relative to the base structure. To avoid inadvertent tilting of the container and, thus, the dumping of its contents, refuse dumpsters may be provided with a locking device to secure the container in the storage position. However, in response to human error and/or accidental actuation, an operator may fail to lock the container in the storage position, thereby leading to inadvertent and undesirable dumping or spilling of the dumpster contents.
Accordingly, there is a need in the relevant art to provide an inexpensive and effective safety locking device capable of preventing accidental tilting and/or dumping of dumpster containers. Furthermore, there is a need in the relevant art to overcome the disadvantages of the prior art.
According to the principles of the present invention, a locking device for a dumpster container is provided. The dumpster container is movable between an upright storing position and a tilted dumping position. The locking device includes a main locking device moveable between an engaged position, where the main locking device engages the dumpster container to retain the dumpster container in the upright storing position, and a disengaged position, where the main locking device disengages the dumpster container to permit movement of the dumpster container into the tilted dumping position. The locking device further includes a blocking plate pivotally coupled to the main locking device. The blocking plate is moveable between a blocking position, where the blocking plate prevents the main locking device from moving from the engaged position to the disengaged position, and an unblocking position. A handle linkage is pivotally coupled to the blocking plate and the main locking device and is moveable to move the blocking plate between the blocking position and the unblocking position. The blocking plate returns to the blocking position once the handle linkage is released.
Further areas of applicability of the present invention will become apparent from the detailed description provided hereinafter. It should be understood that the detailed description and specific examples, while indicating the preferred embodiment of the invention, are intended for purposes of illustration only and are not intended to limit the scope of the invention.
The present invention will become more fully understood from the detailed description and the accompanying drawings, wherein:
The following description of the preferred embodiments is merely exemplary in nature and is in no way intended to limit the invention, its application, or uses. It should be appreciated that the characterizations of various components and orientations described herein as being “vertical”, “horizontal”, “upright”, “right”, “left”, “side”, “top”, or “bottom” are relative characterizations only based upon the particular position or orientation of a given component as illustrated. These terms shall not be regarded as limiting the invention.
With reference to
Safety locking device 10 includes a main locking device 18, a blocking plate 20, and a handle locking device 22, which will each be discussed in detail below.
Still referring to
Blocking plate 20 is provided so as to prevent main locking device 18 from inadvertently becoming disengaged from shaft 32. Blocking plate 20 is a generally planar, rectangular member having a face 36. Blocking plate 20 is pivotally mounted to a support bracket 34 extending from main locking device 18 for rotation about a pivot 35. As best seen in
In order to pivot main locking device 18 into the disengaged position to permit storage container 14 to be raised to its tilted dumping position, blocking plate 20 must first be raised into the raised unblocking position (see
Blocking plate 20 may include an optional peg 40 that provides a convenient handle for aiding in the rotation of blocking plate 20 around pivot 35 between the raised and lowered positions. As will be explained below, peg 40 is merely optional because blocking plate 20 is biased to rotate automatically to the lowered blocking position in response to gravity.
Referring to
Angularly shaped handle linkage 42 is further pivotally attached to main locking device 18 at pivot bracket 50 via pivot 48. Angularly shaped handle linkage 42 is shaped such that as angularly shaped handle linkage 42 pivots about pivot bracket 50 (clockwise in
As seen in
Alternatively, optional handle extension 100 may be eliminated, thereby requiring an operator to manually grasp free end 52 of angularly shaped handle linkage 42 and free end 28 of main locking device 18 to position blocking plate 20 in the raised unblocking position and then to actuate main locking device 18 to the disengaged position to unlock storage container 14 from base structure 16. Once the operator releases free end 52 of angularly shaped handle linkage 42 and free end 28 of main locking device 18, blocking plate 20 will again fall into the lowered blocking position, thereby preventing shaft 32 from exiting opening 38.
The description of the invention is merely exemplary in nature and, thus, variations that do not depart from the gist of the invention are intended to be within the scope of the invention. Such variations are not to be regarded as a departure from the spirit and scope of the invention.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3041030 | Heimrich | Jun 1962 | A |
3968984 | Guth | Jul 1976 | A |
4014572 | Binns | Mar 1977 | A |
4275830 | McDonald | Jun 1981 | A |
4345868 | Rizzo et al. | Aug 1982 | A |
4575302 | Holden | Mar 1986 | A |
4580940 | Sheaves | Apr 1986 | A |
4669940 | Englehardt et al. | Jun 1987 | A |
4966514 | Knapp | Oct 1990 | A |
5011360 | Abram et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5090753 | Goodman | Feb 1992 | A |
5195385 | Johnson | Mar 1993 | A |
5201434 | DeVivo et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5323939 | Young | Jun 1994 | A |
5448945 | Taylor et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5474413 | Georg | Dec 1995 | A |
5551336 | Griffin et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5853277 | Everhart | Dec 1998 | A |
5951230 | Kruzick et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
6027297 | Dungan | Feb 2000 | A |
6086309 | Mason et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6106072 | Lutter, Jr. | Aug 2000 | A |
6113340 | Zalal | Sep 2000 | A |
6135540 | Dungan | Oct 2000 | A |
6154911 | Vanderlinden | Dec 2000 | A |
6257358 | Roach | Jul 2001 | B1 |
20020071749 | Hund, Jr. et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0 092 134 | Apr 1983 | EP |
0 358 046 | Nov 1991 | EP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20050023839 A1 | Feb 2005 | US |