The present invention relates to window coverings known as top down bottom up shades.
Top down bottom up shades usually have a headrail, a bottom rail and a middle rail between the headrail and middle rail. The middle rail is moveable for substantially the entire length along which the shade may be extended. Usually this length extends from just below the headrail to a bottom most position that is adjacent the bottom rail. Window covering material extends between the middle rail and the bottom rail and is moveable between an extended fully lowered position and a retracted fully raised position, based on the positioning of the middle rail and bottom rail. The middle rail is configured to travel throughout the path of travel along which the window covering material may be moved to permit a full range of adjustment options to a user. Examples of top down bottom up shades may be appreciated from U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,839,494 and 5,791,390 and U.S. Patent Application Publication Nos. 2006/0231214 and 2011/0005690.
The full range of motion of the middle rail may pose a risk to small children as lift cords extending between the middle rail and the headrail may be exposed to the children. For example, when the middle rail is in a lowermost position adjacent the bottom rail, a child may be able to touch or interact with such exposed cords. Exposure to such cords could also result in a child becoming entangled in the cords, which can pose a strangulation danger to a child.
Prior to the present invention, the industry has not recognized the potential strangulation risk of a fully lowered top down bottom up shade. This failure to recognize the potential problem may be attributable to the fact that most of the reported child entanglements have involved Venetian blinds and Roman shades. Yet, the same risks exist in a fully lowered top down bottom up shade, particularly if the lift cords for the middle rail are free to move through the headrail.
There has been much discussion about the length that pull cords may extend from a blind without causing a risk of child entanglement. Obviously, if the child cannot reach the cord, then the cord poses no risk. Consequently, window covering manufacturers are now offering window blinds with retractable cords. It is becoming generally accepted in the industry that such retractable cords do not pose a risk of child entanglement if the cord, when fully retracted, does not extend more than twelve inches from the headrail.
A new top down bottom up shade is needed in which the middle rail cannot be lowered to a point at which the lift cords for the middle rail create a risk of child entanglement. Applying the experience and consensus concerning retractable pull cords indicates that top down bottom up shades in which the middle rail cannot be lowered more than twelve inches would not create a risk of child entanglement.
A window covering includes a headrail, a bottom rail, and a middle rail positioned between the headrail and the bottom rail. Window covering material is positioned between the middle rail and the bottom rail. The window covering material is moveable from a retracted position to an extended position. A first set of lift cords extends from the headrail to the middle rail. The first set of lift cords is extendable between the headrail and the middle rail to a predetermined distance. The predetermined distance defines a lowermost position of the middle rail relative to the headrail. The first set of lift cords is retractable to a wound position for defining an uppermost position of the middle rail. A second set of lift cords extends from the headrail to the bottom rail. The second set of lift cords extends through the middle rail and bottom rail to define the extended position of the window covering material and is retractable to raise the bottom rail to define the retracted, fully raised position of the window covering material. The fully raised position of the bottom rail may also be referred to as the uppermost position of the bottom rail. A fully lowered position of the bottom rail may be the position the bottom rail is in when it is in its lowermost position. The predetermined distance about which the first set of lift cords is extendable is less than a distance between the bottom of the middle rail when the middle rail is in the uppermost position of the middle rail and the top of the bottom rail when the bottom rail is in the lowermost position of the bottom rail.
The predetermined distance is preferably determined such that the first set of lift cords extends out of the headrail and to the middle rail by at most twelve inches. In one embodiment, the predetermined distance may be twelve inches or less. It is contemplated that for some applications the predetermined distance could be larger or smaller. For instance, a window covering to be mounted on a very high window opening may have a larger distance to which the first set of cords that control the middle rail could be extended without posing a danger to a child.
In some embodiments, the window covering may also include at least one travel limiting device attached to at least one of the headrail and the middle rail. The at least one travel limiting device may be configured to prevent the first set of lift cords from extending beyond the predetermined distance. For example, a travel limiting device may include one or more spools of travel limiting cord that limit the number of rotations of the shaft about which the first set of lift cords are wound. The first set of lift cords may be unwound from the spool until the predetermined distance is reached at which point the travel limiting cord may be fully unwound. Since the unwound cord is no longer able to move from between the spool and shaft, it prevents the shaft from further rotating, which prevents the first set of cords from further extending from the headrail. In alternative embodiments, one or more brake mechanisms or releasable locks could alternatively be used to prevent the first lift cords from extending past the predetermined distance.
Some embodiments of the window covering may include a rotatable shaft adjacent the headrail. The first set of lift cords can be windable about the rotatable shaft and may also be unwindable from the rotatable shaft. In some embodiments the first set of lift cords may be directly wound on and unwound from the shaft. In other embodiments, one or more spools attached to the shaft may be used for collecting and unwinding the first set of lift cords. For instance, at least one spool may be attached to the shaft. The first set of lift cords is windable on the at least one spool when the shaft rotates in a first direction and the first set of lift cords is unwindable from the at least one spool when the shaft rotates in a second direction that is opposite the first direction. A motor, spring motor, loop cord drive or other actuation mechanism may be attached to the rotatable shaft. As another example, an operator cord that extends from the shaft through a cord lock attached to the headrail may be an actuation mechanism used in embodiments of the window covering. The operator cord may be at least one separate cord windable and unwindable about the shaft or may be portions of the first set of lift cords that extend through the cord lock.
It should be appreciated that the window covering material may be of any type of material suitable for use in window coverings. For example, the window covering material may be comprised of pleated material, cellular material, slats on ladders, fabric material, interconnected fabric segments, non woven fabric material, woven grass or woven wood.
Each of the lift cords may be any type of elongated member that is extendable from the headrail. For instance, each lift cord of the first set of lift cords may be a cord, lifting tape, a strip of material, or another type of flexible elongated member. As another example, the second set of lift cords may include cords, lifting tape, strips of material, or other types of flexible elongated members.
Other details, objects, and advantages of the invention will become apparent as the following description of certain present preferred embodiments thereof and certain present preferred methods of practicing the same proceeds.
Present preferred embodiments of top down bottom up shade are shown in the accompanying drawings and certain present preferred methods of practicing the same are also illustrated therein. It should be appreciated that like reference numbers used in the drawings may identify like components.
Referring to
A first set of lift cords 11 may extend between the headrail 3 and the middle rail 5 and may be moveable to move the middle rail relative to the headrail 3 and also extend or retract the window covering material 4. A second set of lift cords 13 may extend from between the headrail 3 and the bottom rail 7. A terminal end of each lift cord of the second set of lift cords may be attached to the bottom rail 7 and an opposite terminal end may be attached to the headrail 3. The second set of lift cords 13 may pass through the middle rail 5 as well. The second set of lift cords 13 may move to extend or retract window covering material 4 positioned between the middle rail 5 and the bottom rail 7. The lift cords may be any type of suitable flexible elongated member. For instance, each lift cord may be a cord, a strip of material or a lifting tape. The window covering material 4 may be any type of material suitable for covering windows, such as slats on ladders 15, pleated material, cellular material, fabric material, now woven fabric, interconnected fabric segments, woven wood or woven grass.
At least one operator cord 18 may extend from a cord lock 9 attached to the headrail 3 so that a user may control positioning of the shade 1 via the one or more operator cords 18 that extend through the cord lock 9 for controlling movement of the second set of lift cords. The one or more operator cords 18 may be a separate cord or may be portions of the second set of lift cords. Alternatively, at least one motor, a loop cord drive, or at least one spring motor may be utilized for controlling the positions of the window covering material, bottom rail 7, and movement of the second set of lift cords 13.
A second cord lock 9a may also be attached to the headrail. The second cord lock 9a may have one or more operator cords 19 pass through the cord lock to control movement of the first set of lift cords 11 to control movement of the middle rail 5 and window covering material 4. The at least one operator cord 19 may be at least one separate cord that is extendable through the cord lock 9a or may be portions of the first set of lift cords that extend through the cord lock 9a. In alternative embodiments, a loop cord drive or motor could be utilized instead of the second cord lock 9a for controlling movement of the middle rail and first set of lift cords.
The first set of lift cords 11 may be configured to limit the extent to which the middle rail 5 may extend from the headrail 3 as shown in
It should be appreciated that that the distance D should be less than the distance DD between the bottom of the middle rail 5 when the middle rail is in an uppermost position adjacent the headrail 3 and the top of the bottom rail when the window covering material is fully extended. Such a limited moveability of the middle rail prevents the middle rail from moving along the full path of window covering extension as is traditionally done with top down bottom up shades. While such limited movement may hinder a user from having as much freedom in positioning the window covering material as compared to traditional top down bottom up shades, it also improves the safety of such window coverings. For instance, by the distance D being less than the distance DD, the first set of lift cords may be prevented from posing a substantial entanglement risk to small children as it may prevent small children from being able to easily come into contact with such cords.
Referring to
The second set of lift cords 13 may be extended or retracted by rotation of a rod 27. The rod may be positioned in the headrail adjacent to the shaft 21. The lift cords of the second set of lift cords 13 may be wound or unwound from spools 23 attached to the rod 27. As may be seen from
In alternative embodiments, the lift system 20 may utilize motors, a loop cord drive, or spring motors to control movement of the shaft 21 and rod 27 as may be understood from
The spring motor 28 may be attached to the rod 27 so that a user may move the bottom rail to adjust the position of the bottom rail as is commonly done with cordless shades. The spring motor may maintain the position of the bottom rail at any user desired position. The spring motor 28 may also retract the second set of lift cords 13 to retract the bottom rail if a user provides a slight upward force to the bottom rail 7. Of course, the spring motor 28 could be replaced with a motor that may be actuated by a remote control mechanism or a loop cord drive in alternative embodiments.
For example, as illustrated in
Referring to
Embodiments of the window covering may utilize only one travel limiting cord 35 or may utilize a plurality of spaced apart travel limiting cords 35. The shaft 37 and spool 33 of the travel limiting device 31 may be positioned in the headrail adjacent the shaft 21 or may alternatively be located in the middle rail 5. The use of the travel limiting device 31 can permit a fabricator to control the predetermined distance D by which the middle rail is moveable away from the headrail 3 by merely changing a length of one or more travel limiting cords 35. This may help facilitate adjustments a fabricator may make when fabricating a window covering for a particular customer as it would not be necessary to adjust lengths of any of the first set of lift cords 11. For instance, adjustment of the one or more travel limiting cords 35 may be done much more quickly than a change in length to each of the first set of lift cords.
Further, the user of travel limiting device 31 may permit a fabricator or installer to retrofit previously sold window coverings with a mechanism that prevents a middle rail of a top down bottom up shade from moving beyond a predetermined distance D from the headrail 3 to improve the safety of a previously sold product. Such retrofitting may be done without the need of removing and cutting any lift cords in the existing shade and, as a result, may permit an easier and less costly retrofitting option to an installer. This is particularly true for large window coverings that may utilize three or more lift cords that extend from a headrail for moving a middle rail.
It should be understood that embodiments of the window covering may be designed to meet a particular design objective. For instance, embodiments of the lift system may utilize motors, spring motors, loop cord drives or operator cords extending through cord locks in any of a number of different arrangements to control rotation of the shaft 21 and rod 27 for movement of the middle rail 5, bottom rail 7 and window covering material 4. It should also be understood that rod 27 and shaft 21 could have any of a number of lengths or cross sectional shapes for meeting a particular design objective. For example, the rods 27 and shafts 21 could be generally cylindrical rods or be elongated members that have a polygonal cross sectional shape.
While certain present preferred embodiments of the window covering and certain embodiments of methods of practicing the same have been shown and described, it is to be distinctly understood that the invention is not limited thereto but may be otherwise variously embodied and practiced within the scope of the following claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
62765 | Matchett | Mar 1867 | A |
1091656 | Harnly | Mar 1914 | A |
2283640 | Kwon | May 1942 | A |
2920695 | Bennett | Jan 1960 | A |
3192991 | Anderle | Jul 1965 | A |
3528477 | Abraham | Sep 1970 | A |
3552473 | Persson | Jan 1971 | A |
4733711 | Schon | Mar 1988 | A |
4813468 | Fraser | Mar 1989 | A |
4842034 | Haines | Jun 1989 | A |
5443108 | LeVert et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5791390 | Watanabe | Aug 1998 | A |
5839494 | Judkins | Nov 1998 | A |
6164362 | Yang | Dec 2000 | A |
6397918 | Chu | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6516856 | Lai | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6530413 | Hwang | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6550520 | Rossini et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6834701 | Colson et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
7028737 | Hsu | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7063122 | Colson et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7143802 | Strand et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7520311 | Drew | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7571756 | Smith et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7617859 | Auger | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7686059 | Jarosinski et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7740045 | Anderson et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7832450 | Brace et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7866367 | Liang et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7984743 | Rossato | Jul 2011 | B2 |
8365797 | Drew et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
20040016514 | Nien | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20060196612 | Strand et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060231214 | Whyte et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20070068636 | Yu et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070144686 | Drew | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070209765 | Lin | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20080083509 | Hsu et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080149280 | Smith et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080196843 | Nien et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080230189 | Rossato et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080277074 | Lin | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080277076 | Cheng | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20110005690 | Harding | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110265963 | Drew et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130075045 A1 | Mar 2013 | US |