This application is based on PCT Application PCT/EP 2004/008915 filed Aug. 10, 2004 and further claims the priority of German application No. 103 53 353.2 filed Nov. 14, 2003, and the disclosures thereof are incorporated herein by reference.
The present invention relates to a method and apparatus for securing machines, such as bending presses, against unwanted entries for preventing possible injuries.
The present invention is not limited for use in connection with bending presses and can equally be used on edging presses, punching machines, cutting machines and similar devices which have parts and components that execute potentially dangerous movements during a work cycle of the machine. Bending presses shape workpieces primarily by pressing them with a bending die against an opposing die or mold. The desired shape of the workpiece is attained by appropriately shaping the bending die and the associated mold. Frequently the bending die is a tool which is mounted on a first, movable machine part, while the mold is mounted in a second, fixed machine part. However, only the relative motions between the machine parts are important and, as an alternative, the mold can be movable or the die and mold can both move towards and away from each other. The safety system of the present invention can be used on all such machines.
It is well known that bending presses constitute a significant danger for operating personnel, especially danger of injury from tissue damage all the way up to the severance of body parts. It has been known for a long time that bending presses and the like must be protected with safety devices to prevent accidents. For example, German published patent application DE 010 38 223 A1 discloses a light grid safety system for a press. The light grid is formed by several individual light beams that are programmed and coupled to the movable tool part so that during a dangerous movement of a workpiece, only those light beams are activated which secure the zone beneath the moving tool part. The active zone of the light grid moves with the movement of the tool. When one of the light beams is interrupted, movement of the first tool part is stopped.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,579,884 discloses a light grid arrangement in which there are two or three light beams that are parallel to and run ahead of the leading edge of the bending die. When one of the light beams is interrupted, movement of the bending die is stopped. When only two light beams are used, they are arranged symmetrically on the frontal side of the machine, that is, on the side of the machine where the operator is located, and towards the aft, that is, the side of the machine remote from the operator. The same is true when three light beams are used, in which event the third light beam is accurately located beneath the leading edge of the bending die and has a greater spacing from the bending die than the two other light beams. In the arrangement of U.S. Pat. No. 5,579,884, the third light beam is primarily a control beam which prevents that a so-called muting point is set too low. The muting point (which means a point where the safety system is temporarily deactivated) occurs when, during a working cycle of the machine, the light beams of the safety device are temporarily deactivated. Without such temporary deactivation, the working cycle would not be completed when the workpiece being worked causes an interruption of a light beam.
It is therefore an object of the present invention to provide an improved method and apparatus for securing machines in the form of a safety system that assures safety during specific motions and particularly during the dangerous die closing movements of a bending press.
In accordance with the method of the present invention, such a machine, for example a bending press, has a first tool part which moves in the direction of a second tool part so that, during the operational movement, an opening gap between the two tool parts gradually closes. An optoelectronic sensor monitors a safety zone which precedes, that is, extends forward (in the direction of movement) of, the first tool part and monitors at least a portion of the opening gap so that, in the event the safety zone is breached, for example by an intruding hand or head of a person, a switching signal is generated which can be used for stopping the first tool part. In accordance with the invention, the entire (cross-sectional) surface area of the safety zone, but at least its outer border or periphery, are controlled. As the machine goes through an operating cycle, for example for bending a workpiece, the size of the opening gap becomes less relative to the size of the protected zone, and the protected zone is correspondingly reduced during movement of the first tool part in the movement direction towards the second tool part so that during further closing movements of the tool part substantially the entire opening gap is within the protected zone. A principal advantage of the present invention is that towards the end of an operating cycle the protected zone is given the largest possible size to provide optimal security and protection. Thus, as the opening gap becomes smaller in the direction of movement than the protected zone, the protected zone is not deactivated (or muted), but instead the protected zone together with the opening gap is continuously reduced in size. Since the entire surface of the protected zone is monitored, an optimal protection is assured because the entire opening gap is monitored, especially during the final phases of the operating cycle when danger is greatest because the opening gap is about to close.
In contrast to conventional safety arrangements, which use individual light barriers having individual light beams, monitoring the full cross-sectional surface area of the protected zone assures that the entire three-dimensional protected zone is fully monitored. As contrasted with fully monitored systems using expanded light beams that are monitored, as known from EP 1 198 308, for example, continuously fitting the protected zone to the shrinking size of the opening gap assures an optimal monitoring of the machine, especially towards the final, most dangerous phases of its operating cycle.
In one embodiment, the protected zone is entirely deactivated shortly before the opening gap closes completely after the gap has become so small so that no serious danger of injury remains, for example when the opening gap has a size which is so small that the finger of a person can no longer be extended into it.
It is advantageous to set the operating speed of the first tool part by providing a first, faster closing speed which is followed by a second, slower closing speed. The switch from the first to the second closing speed is preset and predetermined on the basis of an initial test run or cycle of the moving tool part on the basis of predetermined required die deceleration ramps or stopping distances.
For example, by intelligently sensing and using the light received by the light receiver, and depending on the size and/or geometric form of the workpiece, it is possible to deactivate at least part of the protected zone. This permits differently sized and/or shaped workpieces to be worked on on the machine and makes it possible, for example, to use the bending press for bending boxes.
Preferably, and to assure the largest possible protection, such a part of the protected zone is deactivated only after the workpiece has entered the protected zone during an operating cycle.
It is preferred to determine the so-called contact point for the first tool part on the basis of its position relative to the upper surface of the workpiece during an operational test run. In this manner, the point during the operating cycle when the workpiece enters the protected zone is known.
A safety system constructed in accordance with the invention includes an optoelectronic sensor with a light emitter for illuminating the protected zone, a light receiver for detecting the emitted light, and a control and processing unit for generating a switching signal that can be used, for example, for arresting further movement of the tool part in the event the protected zone has been breached, for example when the hand of an operator extends into the protected zone. The light emitter illuminates the complete surface of the protected zone.
The light emitter and light receiver are configured so that when the size of the opening gap has been reduced to the size of the protected zone in the direction of movement, further movement of the tool part and a further reduction in the size of the opening gap result in a corresponding size reduction of the protected zone. Consequently, during further closing movements, the entire opening gap remains substantially within the protected zone.
Since the entire surface of the protected zone is monitored, which means that the monitored area is relatively large, and the light receiver is always completely illuminated, the safety system of the present invention is relatively insensitive to possible misalignments of the optical system such as may be caused, for example, by vibrations. This is particularly true when the cross-section of the emitted light at the light receiver is larger than the light receiver.
The sensor is preferably fixedly mounted to the first tool part and moves with it during the entire working cycle. This assures that the protected zone and the first tool part precisely align.
The light sensor is preferably a position resolving sensor and preferably a matrix-like CMOS-receiver.
Preferred embodiments of the invention are further described below with reference to the drawings.
a-2f are schematic side elevational views of parts of the bending press shown in
a-3f are schematic side elevational views of parts of the bending press shown in
Referring to
A holding arm is arranged at the respective ends of upper die 12. The holding arms 28 carry a light emitter 30 and a position resolving light receiver 32 at respective longitudinal ends of upper die 12 and are components of an optoelectronic sensor. Light emitter 30 includes a light source, such as a laser diode and a transmission optic (not shown), which enlarges the emitted light into a light beam 34. Light receiver 32 includes a CMOS-matrix receiver which is illuminated by light beam 34.
Light beam 34 extends along lower die edge 18 of the upper die 12 across the open gap 22. As is shown in
The active part of receiver 32 (which is shown in
The functions of a bending press constructed in accordance with
Each of
The lower half of each of
a shows the beginning of an operating cycle. The upper die is at its beginning position at the upper dead point. Light beam 34 illuminates the entire receiver 32 so that all of its receiving elements are active, and the protected zone has its maximum size.
As the operating cycle progresses, the upper die is lowered as shown in
In the event the die has moved sufficiently so that opening gap 22 is smaller than protected zone 36 in the direction of movement, that is, when the lower side of the protected zone has reached and traveled to below the upper surface of the workpiece, as is illustrated in
The downward movement of upper die 12 continues at a lower closing speed which continuously reduces the size of protected zone 36 until it reaches the muting point, as illustrated in
The downward motion of upper die 12 continues until it touches workpiece 16, as illustrated in
The above-described method for securing bending press 10 and the required configuration of the sensors have the advantage that the opening gap between the upper die 12 and the workpiece 16 results in a protected zone 36 of greatest possible size during each of the operational phases of a work cycle as shown in
Since different workpieces 16 have differing dimensions, and especially different thicknesses, the switching point, the muting point and the contact point can occur at differing points in time during a work cycle. In one embodiment of the present invention, these points can be established by performing a test run, during which the motion sequences of the upper tool are automatically learned and then stored for future reference.
In accordance with another embodiment of the invention, the operation of the securing system and method is described for a different operating mode. As an example,
a shows the position of lower edge 18 of upper die 12, of light beam 34, of receiver 32, and of protected zone 36 at the beginning of an operating cycle.
As the working cycle continues, box 40 begins to extend into protected zone 36, as shown in
Downward motion of upper die 12 continues until the opening gap has been reduced in size to that of protected zone 36 in the direction of movement. Depending on the height of the opening gap, a further section 38.2 of protected zone 36 becomes deactivated. This section 38.2 corresponds to the area of protected zone 36 which is beneath box 40 and overlies lower die 14. As the upper die 12 continues to be lowered, the remaining active protected zone becomes continuously smaller.
According to
In accordance with
For this embodiment of the invention too, the thickness of the sheet metal, its upper surface and the corresponding switching, muting and contact points are initially learned with the help of an operational test run of the upper die for establishing these reference points.
For simple geometric forms of box 40, it is possible not to completely deactivate the half 36.1 of protected zone 36, but to continuously reduce the size of section 36.1 as well as of section 36.2 following the switching point. Other box configurations than those illustrated can of course be worked on in accordance with the present invention.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
103 53 353 | Nov 2003 | DE | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2004/008915 | 8/10/2004 | WO | 00 | 12/18/2006 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2005/052437 | 6/9/2005 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5579884 | Appleyard et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
20020017603 | Haberer et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020104958 | Fiessler | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20030062469 | Braune et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
19604900 | Aug 1997 | DE |
10138223 | Feb 2003 | DE |
10143505 | Mar 2003 | DE |
1291573 | Mar 2003 | EP |
WO 0067932 | Nov 2000 | WO |
WO 2004079255 | Sep 2004 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20070214854 A1 | Sep 2007 | US |