Patent Grant
10326282
Generally, the inventive technology relates to adaptively operating a solar power system. More particularly, the inventive technology may involve dynamically adjusting voltage output limits within the system to achieve desired operating voltages. The inventive technology may be particularly suited to adapting system operation to changing conditions or unforeseen events.
While solar power is a promising source of renewable energy, significant challenges remain with respect to exploiting this technology. One such challenge may involve a susceptibility of solar power systems to be influenced by a wide range of operating conditions. This susceptibility in part may stem from the architecture by which solar power systems typically are designed. In particular, solar power systems generally may utilize a distributed architecture, wherein a relatively large number of individual solar sources—such as solar panels—are used to generate power from sunlight. While ultimately the output of these individual solar sources may be combined to produce the overall power put out by the system, nevertheless each individual solar source may operate within its own set of conditions apart from the other solar sources in the system.
Several factors may influence the conditions within which individual solar sources operate. These conditions may include temperature, insolation, the photoelectric characteristics of the solar source itself, and the like. Moreover, individual solar sources frequently are operated with the goal of obtaining the maximum possible power output from the source. Techniques for operating an individual solar source in this manner generally may be referred to as maximum power point tracking (MPPT), and may be described in some embodiments for example in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/363,709, Filed Jan. 30, 2009, entitled “Systems for Highly Efficient Solar Power Conversion”; International Patent Application No. PCT/US08/80794, filed Oct. 22, 2008, entitled “High Reliability Power Systems and Solar Power Converters”; International Patent Application No. PCT/US08/79605, filed Oct. 10, 2008, entitled “Novel Solar Power Circuits and Powering Methods”; International Patent Application No. PCT/US08/70506, filed Jul. 18, 2008, entitled “High Efficiency Remotely Controllable Solar Energy System”; International Patent Application No. PCT/US08/60345, filed Apr. 15, 2008, entitled “AC Power Systems for Renewable Electrical Energy”; and International Patent Application No. PCT/US08/57105, filed Mar. 14, 2008, entitled “Systems for Highly Efficient Solar Power”; each hereby incorporated by reference herein in its entirety. As a result of these factors, each solar source in a solar power system may operate within a set of conditions perhaps unique and different from the other solar sources in the system.
Because a typical solar power system may have a large number of individual solar sources, each operating essentially within its own conditional framework, the task of combining the voltage outputs of these various solar sources to achieve a consistent and efficient operating voltage of the solar power system may pose technical challenges. For example, the solar sources in a solar power system often may be interconnected in various serial and parallel structures, such as wherein a number of individual solar panels may be serially connected to form a string, and wherein a number of strings may be connected in parallel to form an array. Naturally, the electrical properties of such serial and parallel connections may affect how the voltage output of individual solar sources is combined with the operating voltage of the overall system.
At one extreme, for example, underperforming solar sources on an individual string may cause a voltage drop in the string as a whole, since the total voltage in the string merely is the sum of the voltages of the individual solar sources on the string due to the serial nature of their interconnection. If the voltage in the string drops below a certain level, this may cause a loss of power for the array of strings connected in parallel, due to their parallel interconnection.
At another extreme, spikes in the output of individual solar sources in a string may cause a voltage gain for the string as whole, which again may result in inefficiencies due to the connection topology. Such spikes in voltage may be undesirable for efficiency, safety, or regulatory reasons. For example, solar power systems often are subject to regulatory requirements that impose a maximum operating voltage for the system—frequently a limit of 600 volts—and spikes in the voltage output of individual solar sources can cause the total voltage in the system to exceed the regulatory limit.
To deal with technical issues of this nature, conventional solar power systems may utilize techniques to limit the voltage output of solar sources. For example, where a solar source is known to put out a certain voltage under normal conditions, limits may be designed to create an operating range encompassing both the source's expected normal output as well as a degree of variance to accommodate changes in operating conditions. One architecture for setting such limits may involve connecting each solar source to a photovoltaic DC-DC power converter, wherein the converter may have hardware or software that sets voltage output limits within which the solar source is permitted to operate, and wherein the converters may be serially connected to form a string. The voltage output limits may provide a voltage output range within which the solar source may operate that can accommodate a degree of changed conditions. Should the voltage output limits be exceeded, the solar source may be shut down, disengaged, or otherwise controlled within the solar power system.
However, conventional voltage output limits for solar sources may entail significant drawbacks. For example, conventional voltage output limits only may be capable of being statically set. Once set, the voltage output limits may not be able to be adjusted in real time with respect to changing conditions affecting the solar power system. As a result, setting conventional voltage output limits in this manner may have resulted in undesirable trade-offs. For example, one trade-off may be to foreclose circumstances where it may be desirable to put out voltage for an individual solar source beyond the limit set for its output, such as perhaps to offset unusual voltage drops elsewhere in the system.
The foregoing problems related to conventional solar power systems may represent a long-felt need for an effective solution to the same. While implementing elements may have been available, actual attempts to meet this need may have been lacking to some degree. This may have been due to a failure of those having ordinary skill in the art to fully appreciate or understand the nature of the problems and challenges involved. As a result of this lack of understanding, attempts to meet these long-felt needs may have failed to effectively solve one or more of the problems or challenges here identified. These attempts may even have led away from the technical directions taken by the present inventive technology and may even result in the achievements of the present inventive technology being considered to some degree an unexpected result of the approach taken by some in the field.
The inventive technology relates to methods and apparatus for adaptive operation of solar power systems and in embodiments may include the following the features: techniques for providing one or more external state parameters to a photovoltaic DC-DC power converter; techniques for relationally setting a dynamically adjustable voltage output limit for a photovoltaic DC-DC power converter in relation to one or more external state parameters; and techniques for utilizing a dynamically adjustable voltage output limit of a photovoltaic DC-DC power converter to convert DC photovoltaic input. Accordingly, the objects of the methods and apparatus for adaptive operation of solar power systems described herein address each of the foregoing in a practical manner. Naturally, further objects of the inventive technology will become apparent from the description and drawings below.
As mentioned earlier, the present inventive technology includes a variety of aspects, which may be combined in different ways. The following descriptions are provided to list elements and describe some of the embodiments of the present inventive technology. These elements are listed with initial embodiments, however it should be understood that they may be combined in any manner and in any number to create additional embodiments. The variously described examples and preferred embodiments should not be construed to limit the present inventive technology to only the explicitly described systems, techniques, and applications. Further, this description should be understood to support and encompass descriptions and claims of all the various embodiments, systems, techniques, methods, devices, and applications with any number of the disclosed elements, with each element alone, and also with any and all various permutations and combinations of all elements in this or any subsequent application.
Now with reference primarily to
A DC photovoltaic output of a solar energy source (1) in various embodiments may be established as a DC photovoltaic input to a photovoltaic DC-DC power converter (2). The photovoltaic DC-DC power converter (2) may serve to accept power from the DC photovoltaic output and intermediate power transfer between the solar energy source (1) on one side and the solar power system (3) on the other side by converting the DC photovoltaic input in a manner that accommodates the requirements of each. As but one example, the photovoltaic DC-DC power converter (2) may permit a solar energy source (1) to be operated at an MPP value, such as by creating a MPP voltage for the solar energy source. To illustrate this,
With further attention primarily to
Now referring primarily to
As shown in
Moreover, an external state data interface (7) may serve to provide at least one external state parameter to a photovoltaic DC-DC power converter (2), wherein the parameter, of course, may correspond to the information received by the data interface. For example, an external state parameter may be a voltage parameter, a current parameter, a power parameter, an insolation parameter, a temperature parameter, a system status parameter, a demand status parameter, a power converter output parameter, a string output parameter, a historical data tracking parameter, a regulatory requirement parameter, or the like. In various embodiments, an external state data interface and an external state parameter may be multi-parametric, perhaps using two or more parametric components to provide information on an external state of the system. Regardless, an external state parameter may represent data about conditions in a solar power system (3) external to the power converter, which data then may be utilized in the operation of the power converter as may be necessary or desirable.
Such utilization, for example, may involve relationally setting a dynamically adjustable voltage output limit (8) of a photovoltaic DC-DC power converter (2). A voltage output limit (8) may establish a limit on the range of voltages which the converter may be allowed to put out.
By being dynamically adjustable, voltage output limits (8) may be capable of being adjusted as a dynamic part of the operation of a solar power system (3), as by way of real-time adjustment, near-real time adjustment, adjustment in equilibrium with other system elements, adjustment to cause an operational effect in the system or in response to an effect caused elsewhere in the system, and so forth. For example,
Relationally setting a dynamically adjustable voltage output limit (8) may involve setting the limit in relation to the value of one or more criteria, for example in relation to at least one external state parameter. For example, relationally setting a maximum voltage which the converter may put out may involve determining an appropriate maximum value for the voltage in relation to other voltage events in the system.
In various embodiments, a photovoltaic DC-DC power converter (2) may include a dynamically adjustable voltage output limit control (12) to relationally set a dynamically adjustable voltage output limit (8). The control may be relationally responsive to an external state data interface (7), as for example by receiving information from the data interface, operating in response to data interface information, or the like. Any suitable hardware, software, or combination thereof may be used for the control consistent with the principles discussed herein.
Moreover, various embodiments naturally may involve dynamically adjusting a dynamically adjustable voltage output limit (8) responsive to an external state parameter.
Relationally setting and dynamically adjusting voltage output limits (8) may be done for a variety of purposes. One example may involve compensating for an external state parameter. The external state parameter may provide information about a change in the state of a solar power system (3), and it may be desirable to compensate for the changed condition by operating one or more photovoltaic DC-DC power converters (2) under adjusted voltage output limits (8). An exemplary case of such a situation may involve dropouts of solar energy sources (1) on a string.
By way of comparison,
Relationally setting and dynamically adjusting voltage output limits (8) also may be effected in a variety of manners. As one example, a photovoltaic DC-DC power converter (2) may include a step function control (18). Embodiments may involve implementing a step function to dynamically adjust a dynamically adjustable voltage output limit (8), determining a resultant effect on an external state parameter, and repeating the steps until a desired result is achieved. For example, implementing a step function may involve adjusting a voltage output limit (8) incrementally, discretely, fractionally, or in a likewise manner with respect to an identified endpoint. The precise contours of the steps may be provided by hardware, software, or any other suitable modality. Following each stepwise adjustment, the result on an external state parameter may be observed. In this manner, the adjustment may approach the desired endpoint in a controlled fashion, perhaps avoiding risks such as overshooting the desired target of the adjustment and ensuring the adjustment is approached entirely from one side of the endpoint. As but one example, where it may be critical to avoid exceeding a regulatory voltage limit, utilizing a step function as described may ensure that voltages are raised without risk of exceeding the regulatory requirement.
Another example of how voltage output limits (8) may be relationally set and dynamically adjusted may involve first adjusting an external voltage to a safe condition. A safe condition may be a condition of a solar power system (3) that avoids an undesirable or adverse consequence to the system's operational state, such as perhaps exceeding a regulatory limit for voltage, providing an over-voltage input to an electrical component, or the like. One example of first adjusting an external voltage to a safe state may involve decreasing voltage output limits (8) for one photovoltaic DC-DC power converter (2) prior to raising voltage output limits (8) for another photovoltaic DC-DC power converter (2). In this manner, the risk of exceeding a regulatory voltage limit, even temporarily, may be reduced or eliminated. Accordingly, a photovoltaic DC-DC power converter (2) in various embodiments may include an external voltage safeguard control (19).
A further example of relationally setting and dynamically adjusting voltage output limits (8) may involve slaving a dynamically adjustable voltage output limit (8) in relation to one or more external state parameters. Slaving may involve setting or adjusting based on criteria, wherein some criteria may take precedence over other criteria. For example, embodiments may involve hierarchically slaving dynamically adjustable voltage output limits (8). Naturally, any hierarchy of criteria may be selected as appropriate consistent with the principles discussed herein. One possible hierarchy may involve first slaving a voltage output limit (8) to a regulatory parameter (for example, to avoid exceeding a regulatory voltage limit), second slaving a voltage output limit (8) to an operational parameter (for example, such as compensating for a voltage drop due to panel dropouts on a string (27)), and third slaving a voltage output limit (8) to an MPP parameter (for example, such as ensuring a solar energy source (1) is operated for MPP). Accordingly, in various embodiments a dynamically adjustable voltage output limit control (12) may be a slaved dynamically adjustable voltage output limit control (12) or even a hierarchically slaved dynamically adjustable voltage output limit control (12). Naturally, such hierarchically slaved controls may include primary slaved controls, secondary slaved controls, tertiary slaved controls, and the like correlated to various hierarchical priorities. For example, a primary control may be a regulatory primary slaved control, a secondary control may be an operational secondary slaved control, a tertiary control may be a MPP tertiary slaved control, and so forth.
Relationally setting and dynamically adjusting voltage output limits (8) also may involve utilizing a set point margin. Such a margin may provide a buffer zone between the maximum voltage output of one or more photovoltaic DC-DC power converters (2) and some absolute value. For example, in some embodiments an absolute value may be a regulatory voltage limit, and a set point margin may provide a buffer zone between the regulatory limit and the maximum output of a plurality of converters operating on a string. If the regulatory voltage limit for a string is 600 volts, for example, a set point margin may be established such that the combined maximum voltage output of all converters on the string may be 550 volts, thereby leaving a margin of 50 volts as a buffer zone between the converters' output and the regulatory limit. Naturally, establishing the set point margin may be done by relationally setting and dynamically adjusting voltage output limits (8) of photovoltaic DC-DC power converters (2). With reference to
Another example of how voltage output limits (8) may be relationally set and dynamically adjusted may involve relationally setting or dynamically adjusting using a switchmode modality, duty cycle modality, or the like, perhaps for example as discussed in International Patent Application No. PCT/US08/57105, filed Mar. 14, 2008, entitled “Systems for Highly Efficient Solar Power”, hereby incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.
Of course, the foregoing examples of how voltage output limits (8) may be relationally set and dynamically adjusted are intended to be illustrative and should not be construed as limiting the scope of how voltage output limits (8) may be relationally set and dynamically adjusted consistent with the principles discussed herein.
Dynamically adjusting voltage output limits (8) in some situations may cause photovoltaic DC-DC power converters (2) or solar energy sources (1) to operate in a suboptimal manner. For example,
In various embodiments, providing an external state parameter to a photovoltaic DC-DC power converter (2) may involve providing at least one intra-string parameter, such as wherein the external state parameter may be for a condition of some or all of a string (27) on which the converter is located. Similarly, embodiments may involve providing at least one inter-string parameter, such as wherein the external state parameter may be for a condition on some or all of a string (27) on which the power converter is not located. In this manner, a photovoltaic DC-DC power converter (2) in various embodiments perhaps may be responsive to an intra-string data interface (25) (responsive for example to conditions within a string (27) on which the converter is located) or an inter-string data interface (26) (responsive for example to conditions for a string (27) on which the converter is not located).
Intra-string and inter-string parameters may be utilized to achieve a desired condition for a string (27) or a desired inter-string condition when dynamically adjusting a voltage output limit (8). In this manner, a dynamically adjustable voltage output limit control (12) in fact may serve as an intra-string control or an inter-string control. Examples of desired intra-string conditions or inter-string conditions may include a desired voltage for the string or a desired inter-string voltage among strings (effected for example perhaps by a desired string or inter-string voltage control), a nontraditionally high voltage for the string or a nontraditionally high inter-string voltage among strings (effected for example perhaps by a nontraditionally high string or inter-string voltage control), a near regulatory limit voltage for the string or near regulatory inter-string voltage among strings (effected for example perhaps by a near regulatory limit string or inter-string voltage control), or the like. Nontraditionally high voltages may be valued with respect to conventional solar power systems, which for example may typically be operated in the range of 200 volts to 400 volts. Similarly, near regulatory limit voltages may be valued with respect to a conventional regulatory limit voltage or regulatory voltage requirement, which for example frequently may be 600 volts.
Moreover, in certain embodiments, an intra-string or inter-string parameter may be greater than 400 volts for a string or an inter-string voltage of greater than 400 volts (effected for example perhaps by a 400 volt minimum string or inter-string voltage control), greater than 450 volts for a string or an inter-string voltage of greater than 450 volts (effected for example perhaps by a 450 volt minimum string or inter-string voltage control), greater than 500 volts for a string or an inter-string voltage of greater than 500 volts (effected for example perhaps by a 500 volt minimum string or inter-string voltage control), greater than 550 volts for a string or an inter-string voltage of greater than 550 volts (effected for example perhaps by a 550 volt minimum string or inter-string voltage control), greater than 65% of the regulatory voltage requirement for an intra-string voltage or inter-string voltage (effected for example perhaps by a 65% regulatory requirement minimum string or inter-string voltage control), greater than 70% of the regulatory voltage requirement for an intra-string voltage or inter-string voltage (effected for example perhaps by a 70% regulatory requirement minimum string or inter-string voltage control), greater than 75% of the regulatory voltage requirement for an intra-string voltage or inter-string voltage (effected for example perhaps by a 75% regulatory requirement minimum string or inter-string voltage control), greater than 80% of the regulatory voltage requirement for an intra-string voltage or inter-string voltage (effected for example perhaps by a 80% regulatory requirement minimum string or inter-string voltage control), greater than 85% of the regulatory voltage requirement for an intra-string voltage or inter-string voltage (effected for example perhaps by a 85% regulatory requirement minimum string or inter-string voltage control), greater than 90% of the regulatory voltage requirement for an intra-string voltage or inter-string voltage (effected for example perhaps by a 90% regulatory requirement minimum string or inter-string voltage control), and greater than 95% of the regulatory voltage requirement for an intra-string voltage or inter-string voltage (effected for example perhaps by a 95% regulatory requirement minimum string or inter-string voltage control).
With further respect to the foregoing voltages, providing an intra-string parameter to a photovoltaic DC-DC power converter (2) in some embodiments may involve providing a voltage for the intra-string element. An intra-string element may be merely something else located on the same string (27) on which the converter may be located, such as perhaps the combination of another intra-string solar energy source (1) connected to another intra-string photovoltaic DC-DC power converter (2) serially located on the same string (27). In these cases, an intra-string data interface to which a photovoltaic DC-DC power converter (2) in various embodiments may be responsive may be an intra-string element voltage data interface.
Similarly, providing an inter-string parameter to a photovoltaic DC-DC power converter (2) in some embodiments may involve providing a voltage for an external string (27), such as perhaps a string (27) other than the string (27) on which the power converter is located. In these cases, an inter-string data interface to which a photovoltaic DC-DC power converter (2) in various embodiments may be responsive may be an external string voltage data interface.
Moreover, dynamically adjusting a voltage output limit (8) for the power converter may involve utilizing the intra-string or inter-string parameter to achieve a desired condition for a string (27), desired inter-string condition, or the like. For example, such utilization may involve compensating for the voltage of an intra-string element or external string (27) (for example, such as wherein an intra-string control may be an intra-string element voltage compensation control and an inter-string control may be an external string voltage compensation control), perhaps such as consistent with the principles described elsewhere herein.
Various embodiments may involve compensating for an increased voltage output (for example, such as a voltage spike caused by reflectivity or other high insolation conditions) of an intra-string element or external string (utilizing for example perhaps an intra-string solar energy source or external string voltage output increase compensation control), compensating for a decreased voltage output (for example, such as clouding or other low insolation conditions) of an intra-string element or external string (utilizing for example perhaps an intra-string solar energy source or external string voltage output decrease compensation control), compensating for dropout (for example, such as sudden failure of one or more sources on a string) of an intra-string element or external string (utilizing for example perhaps an intra-string solar energy source or external string voltage output dropout compensation control), compensating for shading (for example, such as due to daily or seasonal moving patterns of shade) of an intra-string element or external string (utilizing for example perhaps a shaded intra-string solar energy source or external string compensation control), compensating for blockage (for example, such as due to the buildup of dirt or other debris) of an intra-string element or external string (utilizing for example perhaps a blocked intra-string solar energy source or external string compensation control), compensating for damage (for example, such as due to weather, manmade, or other events) to an intra-string element or external string (utilizing for example perhaps a damaged intra-string or external string solar energy source compensation control), compensating for malfunctioning (for example, due to mechanical failures or other causes) of an intra-string element or external string (utilizing for example perhaps an intra-string solar energy source or external string malfunction compensation control), compensating for non-uniformity (for example, due to different makes or models of equipment) in an intra-string element or external string (utilizing for example perhaps a non-uniform intra-string solar energy source or external string compensation control), or the like.
Of course, the inventive technology should be considered to encompass plural embodiments of the methods and apparatus discussed herein. For example, embodiments may include a plurality of solar energy sources (1), each having a DC photovoltaic output, and a plurality of photovoltaic DC-DC power converters (2), each having a DC photovoltaic input that accepts power from at least one DC photovoltaic output, an external state data interface (7), a dynamically adjustable voltage output limit control (12), and a converted DC photovoltaic output. Dynamically adjusting a voltage output limit (8) for a photovoltaic DC-DC power converter (2) of course may include dynamically adjusting voltage output limits (8) for a plurality of power converters in any combination consistent with the principles discussed herein, perhaps including power converters located on the same string (27) or even different strings (27), and perhaps utilizing any combination of intra-string and inter-string parameters, data interfaces, and controls as may be appropriate to achieve any desired string conditions or even inter-string conditions. Similarly, providing an external state parameter to a photovoltaic DC-DC power converter (2) may include providing any number of external state parameters to any plurality of power converters in any combination, and dynamically adjustable voltage output limits (8) may be relationally set or dynamically adjusted in relation to the provided external state parameters in any plurality of power converters in any combination, all as consistent with the principles discussed herein. As but one example, some situations may involve providing a voltage output of one photovoltaic DC-DC power converter (2) to another photovoltaic DC-DC power converter (2), and relationally setting a voltage output limit (8) in response thereto, though of course this example is merely illustrative and should not be construed to limit the various possible combinations as just described.
As mentioned above, the above converter and other inventive designs can be applied to a wide range of power situations. Almost any varying source of power can be enhanced by such power conversion and control. These powers can be consumer power, industrial power, individual consumer or such device or battery power, and even large scale grid power sources, and all such applications should be understood as encompassed within the present application and disclosure.
While the invention has been described in connection with some preferred embodiments, it is not intended to limit the scope of the invention to the particular form set forth, but on the contrary, it is intended to cover such alternatives, modifications, and equivalents as may be included within the spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the statements of invention.
Examples of Alternative Claims May Include:
As can be easily understood from the foregoing, the basic concepts of the present inventive technology may be embodied in a variety of ways. It involves both voltage output limitation techniques as well as devices to accomplish the appropriate voltage output limiting. In this application, the voltage output limitation techniques are disclosed as part of the results shown to be achieved by the various devices described and as steps which are inherent to utilization. They are simply the natural result of utilizing the devices as intended and described. In addition, while some devices are disclosed, it should be understood that these not only accomplish certain methods but also can be varied in a number of ways. Importantly, as to all of the foregoing, all of these facets should be understood to be encompassed by this disclosure.
The discussion included in this patent application is intended to serve as a basic description. The reader should be aware that the specific discussion may not explicitly describe all embodiments possible; many alternatives are implicit. It also may not fully explain the generic nature of the inventive technology and may not explicitly show how each feature or element can actually be representative of a broader function or of a great variety of alternative or equivalent elements. Again, these are implicitly included in this disclosure. Where the inventive technology is described in device-oriented terminology, each element of the device implicitly performs a function. Apparatus claims may not only be included for the device described, but also method or process claims may be included to address the functions the inventive technology and each element performs. Neither the description nor the terminology is intended to limit the scope of the claims that will be included in any subsequent patent application.
It should also be understood that a variety of changes may be made without departing from the essence of the inventive technology. Such changes are also implicitly included in the description. They still fall within the scope of this inventive technology. A broad disclosure encompassing both the explicit embodiment(s) shown, the great variety of implicit alternative embodiments, and the broad methods or processes and the like are encompassed by this disclosure and may be relied upon when drafting the claims for any subsequent patent application. It should be understood that such language changes and broader or more detailed claiming may be accomplished at a later date (such as by any required deadline) or in the event the applicant subsequently seeks a patent filing based on this filing. With this understanding, the reader should be aware that this disclosure is to be understood to support any subsequently filed patent application that may seek examination of as broad a base of claims as deemed within the applicant's right and may be designed to yield a patent covering numerous aspects of the inventive technology both independently and as an overall system.
Further, each of the various elements of the inventive technology and claims may also be achieved in a variety of manners. Additionally, when used or implied, an element is to be understood as encompassing individual as well as plural structures that may or may not be physically connected. This disclosure should be understood to encompass each such variation, be it a variation of an embodiment of any apparatus embodiment, a method or process embodiment, or even merely a variation of any element of these. Particularly, it should be understood that as the disclosure relates to elements of the inventive technology, the words for each element may be expressed by equivalent apparatus terms or method terms—even if only the function or result is the same. Such equivalent, broader, or even more generic terms should be considered to be encompassed in the description of each element or action. Such terms can be substituted where desired to make explicit the implicitly broad coverage to which this inventive technology is entitled. As but one example, it should be understood that all actions may be expressed as a means for taking that action or as an element which causes that action. Similarly, each physical element disclosed should be understood to encompass a disclosure of the action which that physical element facilitates. Regarding this last aspect, as but one example, the disclosure of a “converter” should be understood to encompass disclosure of the act of “converting”—whether explicitly discussed or not—and, conversely, were there effectively disclosure of the act of “converting”, such a disclosure should be understood to encompass disclosure of a “converter” and even a “means for converting.” Such changes and alternative terms are to be understood to be explicitly included in the description. Any patents, publications, or other references mentioned in this application for patent are hereby incorporated by reference. Any priority case(s) claimed by this application is hereby appended and hereby incorporated by reference. In addition, as to each term used it should be understood that, to the extent consistent with applicable law governing the construction of terminology in patents and patent applications, common dictionary definitions should be understood as incorporated for each term and all definitions, alternative terms, and synonyms such as contained in the Random House Webster's Unabridged Dictionary, second edition are hereby incorporated by reference. Finally, all references listed in the list of References To Be Incorporated By Reference or other information statement filed with the application or in the table below are hereby appended and hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety, however, as to each of the above, to the extent that such information or statements incorporated by reference might be considered inconsistent with the patenting of this/these inventive technology(s) such statements are expressly not to be considered as made by the applicant(s).
Thus, the applicant(s) should be understood to have support to claim and make a statement of invention to at least: i) each of the solar power devices as herein disclosed and described, ii) the related methods disclosed and described, iii) similar, equivalent, and even implicit variations of each of these devices and methods, iv) those alternative designs which accomplish each of the functions shown as are disclosed and described, v) those alternative designs and methods which accomplish each of the functions shown as are implicit to accomplish that which is disclosed and described, vi) each feature, component, and step shown as separate and independent inventions, vii) the applications enhanced by the various systems or components disclosed, viii) the resulting products produced by such systems or components, ix) each system, method, and element shown or described as now applied to any specific field or devices mentioned, x) methods and apparatuses substantially as described hereinbefore and with reference to any of the accompanying examples, xi) the various combinations and permutations of each of the elements disclosed, xii) each potentially dependent claim or concept as a dependency on each and every one of the independent claims or concepts presented, and xiii) all inventions described herein.
With regard to claims whether now or later presented for examination, it should be understood that for practical reasons and so as to avoid great expansion of the examination burden, the applicant may at any time present only initial claims or perhaps only initial claims with only initial dependencies. The office and any third persons interested in potential scope of this or subsequent applications should understand that broader claims may be presented at a later date in this case, in a case claiming the benefit of this case, or in any continuation in spite of any preliminary amendments, other amendments, claim language, or arguments presented, thus throughout the pendency of any case there is no intention to disclaim or surrender any potential subject matter. It should be understood that if or when broader claims are presented, such may require that any relevant prior art that may have been considered at any prior time may need to be re-visited since it is possible that to the extent any amendments, claim language, or arguments presented in this or any subsequent application are considered as made to avoid such prior art, such reasons may be eliminated by later presented claims or the like. Both the examiner and any person otherwise interested in existing or later potential coverage, or considering if there has at any time been any possibility of an indication of disclaimer or surrender of potential coverage, should be aware that no such surrender or disclaimer is ever intended or ever exists in this or any subsequent application. Limitations such as arose in Hakim v. Cannon Avent Group, PLC, 479 F.3d 1313 (Fed. Cir 2007), or the like are expressly not intended in this or any subsequent related matter. In addition, support should be understood to exist to the degree required under new matter laws—including but not limited to European Patent Convention Article 123(2) and United States Patent Law 35 USC 132 or other such laws—to permit the addition of any of the various dependencies or other elements presented under one independent claim or concept as dependencies or elements under any other independent claim or concept. In drafting any claims at any time whether in this application or in any subsequent application, it should also be understood that the applicant has intended to capture as full and broad a scope of coverage as legally available. To the extent that insubstantial substitutes are made, to the extent that the applicant did not in fact draft any claim so as to literally encompass any particular embodiment, and to the extent otherwise applicable, the applicant should not be understood to have in any way intended to or actually relinquished such coverage as the applicant simply may not have been able to anticipate all eventualities; one skilled in the art, should not be reasonably expected to have drafted a claim that would have literally encompassed such alternative embodiments.
Further, if or when used, the use of the transitional phrase “comprising” is used to maintain the “open-end” claims herein, according to traditional claim interpretation. Thus, unless the context requires otherwise, it should be understood that the term “comprise” or variations such as “comprises” or “comprising”, are intended to imply the inclusion of a stated element or step or group of elements or steps but not the exclusion of any other element or step or group of elements or steps. Such terms should be interpreted in their most expansive form so as to afford the applicant the broadest coverage legally permissible. The use of the phrase, “or any other claim” is used to provide support for any claim to be dependent on any other claim, such as another dependent claim, another independent claim, a previously listed claim, a subsequently listed claim, and the like. As one clarifying example, if a claim were dependent “on claim 20 or any other claim” or the like, it could be re-drafted as dependent on claim 1, claim 15, or even claim 715 (if such were to exist) if desired and still fall with the disclosure. It should be understood that this phrase also provides support for any combination of elements in the claims and even incorporates any desired proper antecedent basis for certain claim combinations such as with combinations of method, apparatus, process, and the like claims.
Finally, the applicant expressly reserves the right to use all of or a portion of any originally filed claim, as the scope of such claims are set forth in this patent application, as additional description to support any of or all of the claims or any element or component thereof, and the applicant further expressly reserves the right to move any portion of or all of the content of such claims or any element or component thereof from the description into the claims or vice-versa as necessary to define the matter for which protection is sought by this application or by any subsequent continuation, division, or continuation-in-part application thereof, or to obtain any benefit of, reduction in fees pursuant to, or to comply with the patent laws, rules, or regulations of any country or treaty, and such content shall survive during the entire pendency of this application including any subsequent continuation, division, or continuation-in-part application thereof or any reissue or extension thereon.
This application is a continuation, and claims the benefit and priority of, U.S. application Ser. No. 13/254,666 filed Sep. 2, 2011 and issuing as U.S. Pat. No. 9,442,504 on Sep. 13, 2016; which is a US National Phase Application, and claims the benefit and priority, of International Application No. PCT/US09/41044, filed Apr. 17, 2009, each application is hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3900946 | Sirtl et al. | Aug 1975 | A |
| 4127797 | Perper | Nov 1978 | A |
| 4168124 | Pizzi | Sep 1979 | A |
| 4218139 | Sheffield | Aug 1980 | A |
| 4222665 | Tachizawa | Sep 1980 | A |
| 4249958 | Baudin | Feb 1981 | A |
| 4274044 | Barre | Jun 1981 | A |
| 4341607 | Tison | Jul 1982 | A |
| 4375662 | Baker | Mar 1983 | A |
| 4390940 | Corbefin et al. | Jun 1983 | A |
| 4395675 | Toumani | Jul 1983 | A |
| 4404472 | Steigerwald | Sep 1983 | A |
| 4409537 | Harris | Oct 1983 | A |
| 4445030 | Carlson | Apr 1984 | A |
| 4445049 | Steigerwald | Apr 1984 | A |
| 4513167 | Brandstetter | Apr 1985 | A |
| 4528503 | Cole | Jul 1985 | A |
| 4580090 | Bailey et al. | Apr 1986 | A |
| 4581716 | Kamiya | Apr 1986 | A |
| 4619863 | Taylor | Oct 1986 | A |
| 4626983 | Harada et al. | Dec 1986 | A |
| 4634943 | Reick | Jan 1987 | A |
| 4649334 | Nakajima | Mar 1987 | A |
| 4652770 | Kumano | Mar 1987 | A |
| 4725740 | Nakata | Feb 1988 | A |
| 4749982 | Rikuna et al. | Jun 1988 | A |
| 4794909 | Elden | Jan 1989 | A |
| 4873480 | Lafferty | Oct 1989 | A |
| 4896034 | Kiriseko | Jan 1990 | A |
| 4899269 | Rouzies | Feb 1990 | A |
| 4922396 | Niggemeyer | May 1990 | A |
| 5027051 | Lafferty | Jun 1991 | A |
| 5028861 | Pace et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
| 5144222 | Herbert | Sep 1992 | A |
| 5179508 | Lange et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
| 5270636 | Lafferty | Dec 1993 | A |
| 5401561 | Fisun et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
| 5402060 | Erisman | Mar 1995 | A |
| 5493155 | Okamoto et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
| 5493204 | Caldwell | Feb 1996 | A |
| 5503260 | Riley | Apr 1996 | A |
| 5646502 | Johnson | Jul 1997 | A |
| 5648731 | Decker et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
| 5659465 | Flack et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
| 5669987 | Takehara et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
| 5689242 | Sims et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
| 5734258 | Esser | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5741370 | Hanoka | Apr 1998 | A |
| 5747967 | Muljadi et al. | May 1998 | A |
| 5782994 | Mori et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
| 5801519 | Midya et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5896281 | Bingley | Apr 1999 | A |
| 5898585 | Sirichote et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
| 5923100 | Lukens et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
| 5932994 | Jo et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
| 6046401 | McCabe | Apr 2000 | A |
| 6081104 | Kern | Jun 2000 | A |
| 6124769 | Igarashi et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
| 6162986 | Shiotsuka | Dec 2000 | A |
| 6166527 | Dwelley et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
| 6180868 | Yoshino et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6181590 | Yamane et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6191501 | Bos | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6218605 | Daily et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6218820 | D'Arrigo et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6219623 | Wills | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6262558 | Weinburg | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6275016 | Ivanov | Aug 2001 | B1 |
| 6278052 | Takehara et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
| 6281485 | Siri | Aug 2001 | B1 |
| 6282104 | Kern | Aug 2001 | B1 |
| 6314007 | Johnson, Jr. et al. | Nov 2001 | B2 |
| 6331670 | Takehara et al. | Dec 2001 | B2 |
| 6348781 | Midya et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
| 6351400 | Lumsden | Feb 2002 | B1 |
| 6369462 | Siri | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6433522 | Siri | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6433992 | Nakagawa et al. | Aug 2002 | B2 |
| 6441896 | Field | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6448489 | Kimura et al. | Sep 2002 | B2 |
| 6493246 | Suzui et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
| 6515215 | Mimura | Feb 2003 | B1 |
| 6545211 | Mimura | Apr 2003 | B1 |
| 6545868 | Kledzik et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
| 6593521 | Kobayashi | Jul 2003 | B2 |
| 6624350 | Nixon et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
| 6636431 | Seki et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
| 6670721 | Lof et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
| 6686533 | Raum et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
| 6686727 | Ledenev et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
| 6696823 | Ledenev et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
| 6703555 | Takabayashi et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
| 6750391 | Bower et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
| 6788033 | Vinciarelli | Sep 2004 | B2 |
| 6791024 | Toyomura | Sep 2004 | B2 |
| 6804127 | Zhou | Oct 2004 | B2 |
| 6889122 | Perez | May 2005 | B2 |
| 6914418 | Sung | Jun 2005 | B2 |
| 6914420 | Crocker | Jul 2005 | B2 |
| 6920055 | Zeng et al. | Jul 2005 | B1 |
| 6952355 | Rissio et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
| 6958922 | Kazem | Oct 2005 | B2 |
| 6984965 | Vinciarelli | Jan 2006 | B2 |
| 6984970 | Capel | Jan 2006 | B2 |
| 7019988 | Fung et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
| 7046531 | Zocchi et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
| 7068017 | Willner et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
| 7072194 | Nayar et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
| 7088595 | Nino | Aug 2006 | B2 |
| 7091707 | Cutler | Aug 2006 | B2 |
| 7092265 | Kernahan | Aug 2006 | B2 |
| 7158395 | Deng et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
| 7193872 | Siri | Mar 2007 | B2 |
| 7227278 | Realmuto et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
| 7248946 | Bashaw et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
| 7274975 | Miller | Sep 2007 | B2 |
| 7333916 | Warfield et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
| 7339287 | Jepsen et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
| 7365661 | Thomas | Apr 2008 | B2 |
| 7471073 | Rettenwort et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
| 7479774 | Wai | Jan 2009 | B2 |
| 7514900 | Sander et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
| 7596008 | Iwata et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
| D602432 | Moussa | Oct 2009 | S |
| 7602080 | Hadar et al. | Oct 2009 | B1 |
| 7605498 | Ledenev et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
| 7619200 | Seymour et al. | Nov 2009 | B1 |
| 7619323 | Tan et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
| 7663342 | Kimball et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
| 7719140 | Ledenev et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
| 7768155 | Fornage | Aug 2010 | B2 |
| 7786716 | Simburger et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
| 7807919 | Powell | Oct 2010 | B2 |
| 7834580 | Haines | Nov 2010 | B2 |
| 7843085 | Ledenev et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
| 7919953 | Porter et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
| 7948221 | Watanabe et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
| 7962249 | Zhang et al. | Jun 2011 | B1 |
| 8004116 | Ledenev et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
| 8013472 | Adest et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
| 8018748 | Leonard | Sep 2011 | B2 |
| 8058747 | Avrutsky et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
| 8093756 | Porter et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
| 8106765 | Ackerson et al. | Jan 2012 | B1 |
| 8242634 | Schatz et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
| 8264195 | Takehara et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
| 8273979 | Weir | Sep 2012 | B2 |
| 8304932 | Ledenev et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
| 8314375 | Arditi et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
| 8461811 | Porter et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
| 8473250 | Adest | Jun 2013 | B2 |
| 8482153 | Ledenev et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
| 8531055 | Adest et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
| 8593103 | Takehara et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
| 8816535 | Adest et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
| 8854193 | Makhota et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
| 8860241 | Hadar et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
| 9042145 | Schill | May 2015 | B2 |
| 9112379 | Sella et al. | Aug 2015 | B2 |
| 9366714 | Ledenev et al. | Jun 2016 | B2 |
| 9368964 | Adest et al. | Jun 2016 | B2 |
| 9397497 | Ledenev | Jul 2016 | B2 |
| 9438037 | Ledenev et al. | Sep 2016 | B2 |
| 9442504 | Porter et al. | Sep 2016 | B2 |
| 9466737 | Ledenev | Oct 2016 | B2 |
| 9673630 | Ledenev et al. | Jun 2017 | B2 |
| 10032939 | Ledenev et al. | Jul 2018 | B2 |
| 20010007522 | Nakagawa et al. | Jul 2001 | A1 |
| 20010032664 | Takehara et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
| 20020038200 | Shimizu et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
| 20020195136 | Takabayashi et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20030062078 | Mimura | Apr 2003 | A1 |
| 20030075211 | Makita et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
| 20030117822 | Stamenic et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20030218449 | Ledenev et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
| 20040027112 | Kondo et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
| 20040095020 | Kernahan et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
| 20040100149 | Lai | May 2004 | A1 |
| 20040135560 | Kernahan | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040159102 | Toyomura et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
| 20040164557 | West | Aug 2004 | A1 |
| 20040207366 | Sung | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20040211456 | Brown | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20050002214 | Deng et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050068012 | Cutler | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050077879 | Near | Apr 2005 | A1 |
| 20050105224 | Nishi | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050109386 | Marshall | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050116475 | Hibi et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050121067 | Toyomura | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050162018 | Realmuto et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
| 20050169018 | Hatai et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
| 20050218876 | Nino | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20050254191 | Bashaw et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
| 20060017327 | Siri et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
| 20060103360 | Cutler | May 2006 | A9 |
| 20060162772 | Preser et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060171182 | Siri et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060174939 | Matan | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20070024257 | Boldo | Feb 2007 | A1 |
| 20070035975 | Dickerson et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
| 20070044837 | Simburger et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070069520 | Schetters | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070111103 | Konishiike et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070119718 | Gibson et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070133241 | Mumtaz et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
| 20070159866 | Siri | Jul 2007 | A1 |
| 20070165347 | Wendt et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
| 20070171680 | Perreault et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
| 20070236187 | Wai et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
| 20080036440 | Garmer | Feb 2008 | A1 |
| 20080062724 | Feng et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
| 20080097655 | Hadar et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
| 20080101101 | Iwata et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080111517 | Pfeifer et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080123375 | Beardsley | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080136367 | Adest et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
| 20080143188 | Adest et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
| 20080144294 | Adest et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
| 20080147335 | Adest et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
| 20080150366 | Adest et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
| 20080164766 | Adest et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| 20080186004 | Williams | Aug 2008 | A1 |
| 20080236648 | Klein et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20080238195 | Shaver | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20080247201 | Perol | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20080257397 | Glaser et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20090020151 | Fornage | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| 20090039852 | Fisehlov et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
| 20090078300 | Ang et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
| 20090114263 | Powell et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
| 20090120485 | Kikinis | May 2009 | A1 |
| 20090133736 | Powell et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
| 20090097655 | Hadar et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
| 20090140715 | Adest et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
| 20090141522 | Adest et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
| 20090145480 | Adest et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
| 20090146505 | Powell et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
| 20090146667 | Adest et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
| 20090146671 | Gazit | Jun 2009 | A1 |
| 20090147554 | Adest et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
| 20090150005 | Hadar et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
| 20090160258 | Allen et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
| 20090206666 | Sella | Aug 2009 | A1 |
| 20090207543 | Boniface et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
| 20090218887 | Ledenev et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
| 20090234692 | Powell et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
| 20090237042 | Glovinksi | Sep 2009 | A1 |
| 20090237043 | Glovinksi | Sep 2009 | A1 |
| 20090273241 | Gazit et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
| 20090283128 | Zhang et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
| 20090283129 | Foss | Nov 2009 | A1 |
| 20090284078 | Zhang et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
| 20090284232 | Zhang et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
| 20090284240 | Zhang et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
| 20090284998 | Zhang et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
| 20100001587 | Casey et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100026097 | Avrutsky et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
| 20100027297 | Avrutsky et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
| 20100038968 | Ledenev et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
| 20100078057 | Karg et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
| 20100085670 | Palaniswami et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
| 20100089431 | Weir | Apr 2010 | A1 |
| 20100117858 | Rozenboim | May 2010 | A1 |
| 20100118985 | Rozenboim | May 2010 | A1 |
| 20100127570 | Hadar et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
| 20100127571 | Hadar et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
| 20100132758 | Gilmore | Jun 2010 | A1 |
| 20100139732 | Hadar et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
| 20100139734 | Hadar et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
| 20100139743 | Hadar et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
| 20100195361 | Stem | Aug 2010 | A1 |
| 20100229915 | Ledenev et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20100246230 | Porter et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20100253150 | Porter et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
| 20100308662 | Schatz et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
| 20100327659 | Lisi | Dec 2010 | A1 |
| 20110005567 | Vandersluis et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
| 20110067745 | Ledenev et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
| 20110095613 | Huang et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
| 20110115300 | Chiang et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
| 20110127841 | Chiang et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110160930 | Batten et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110175454 | Williams et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
| 20110181251 | Porter et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
| 20110193515 | Wu et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
| 20110210611 | Ledenev et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
| 20110316346 | Porter et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
| 20120003251 | Ledenev et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
| 20120043818 | Stratakos et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
| 20120104864 | Porter et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
| 20120175963 | Adest et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
| 20120212066 | Adest et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
| 20120223584 | Ledenev et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
| 20130271096 | Inagaki | Oct 2013 | A1 |
| 20140045325 | Ledenev et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
| 20150100257 | Adest et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
| 20150130284 | Ledenev et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
| 20160156384 | Fabre et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
| 20160226257 | Porter et al. | Aug 2016 | A1 |
| 20160268809 | Ledenev et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
| 20160329720 | Ledenev et al. | Nov 2016 | A1 |
| 20160336899 | Ledenev et al. | Nov 2016 | A1 |
| 20160365734 | Ledenev | Dec 2016 | A1 |
| 20170271879 | Ledenev et al. | Sep 2017 | A1 |
| 20170373503 | Ledenev et al. | Dec 2017 | A1 |
| 20180048161 | Porter et al. | Feb 2018 | A1 |
| 20180374965 | Ledenev et al. | Dec 2018 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 2702392 | Sep 2015 | CA |
| 2737134 | Oct 2017 | CA |
| 1470098 | Jan 2004 | CN |
| 101904015 | Dec 2010 | CN |
| 102013853 | Apr 2011 | CN |
| 0178446 | Jan 1989 | EP |
| 0383971 | Aug 1990 | EP |
| 677749 | Oct 1995 | EP |
| 824273 | Feb 1998 | EP |
| 964415 | Dec 1999 | EP |
| 964457 | Dec 1999 | EP |
| 780750 | Mar 2002 | EP |
| 1291997 | Mar 2003 | EP |
| 2017948 | Jan 2009 | EP |
| 2515424 | Oct 2012 | EP |
| 3176933 | Jun 2017 | EP |
| 324505 | May 2018 | EP |
| 310362 | Sep 1929 | GB |
| 612859 | Nov 1948 | GB |
| 1231961 | May 1971 | GB |
| 424556.9 | Nov 2005 | GB |
| 2415841 | Jan 2006 | GB |
| 2419968 | May 2006 | GB |
| 2421847 | Jul 2006 | GB |
| 2434490 | Jul 2007 | GB |
| 62-256156 | Jul 1987 | JP |
| 07-302130 | Nov 1995 | JP |
| 8046231 | Feb 1996 | JP |
| 2000-174307 | Jun 2000 | JP |
| 2006020390 | Jun 2004 | JP |
| 2007058845 | Aug 2007 | JP |
| 2007-325371 | Dec 2007 | JP |
| 2011-193548 | Sep 2011 | JP |
| 2012-60714 | Mar 2012 | JP |
| 1020070036528 | Mar 2007 | KR |
| 9003680 | Apr 1990 | WO |
| 9003680 | Apr 1990 | WO |
| 0217469 | Feb 2002 | WO |
| 02073785 | Sep 2002 | WO |
| 03036688 | May 2003 | WO |
| 2004100344 | Nov 2004 | WO |
| 2004100348 | Nov 2004 | WO |
| 2004107543 | Dec 2004 | WO |
| 2005027300 | Mar 2005 | WO |
| 2005036725 | Apr 2005 | WO |
| 2005076445 | Aug 2005 | WO |
| 2006005125 | Jan 2006 | WO |
| 2006013600 | Feb 2006 | WO |
| 2006048688 | May 2006 | WO |
| 2006048689 | May 2006 | WO |
| 2006071436 | Jul 2006 | WO |
| 2006078685 | Jul 2006 | WO |
| 2006117551 | Nov 2006 | WO |
| 2006137948 | Dec 2006 | WO |
| 2007007360 | Jan 2007 | WO |
| 2007080429 | Jul 2007 | WO |
| 2007142693 | Dec 2007 | WO |
| 2008069926 | Jun 2008 | WO |
| 2008125915 | Oct 2008 | WO |
| 2008132553 | Nov 2008 | WO |
| 2008142480 | Nov 2008 | WO |
| 2008142480 | Nov 2008 | WO |
| 2009003680 | Jan 2009 | WO |
| 2009007782 | Jan 2009 | WO |
| 2009007782 | Jan 2009 | WO |
| 2009051853 | Apr 2009 | WO |
| 2009051854 | Apr 2009 | WO |
| 2009051870 | Apr 2009 | WO |
| 2009055474 | Apr 2009 | WO |
| 2009059028 | May 2009 | WO |
| 2009064683 | May 2009 | WO |
| 2009072075 | Jun 2009 | WO |
| 2009072075 | Jun 2009 | WO |
| 2009072076 | Jun 2009 | WO |
| 2009072076 | Jun 2009 | WO |
| 2009072077 | Jun 2009 | WO |
| 2009073867 | Jun 2009 | WO |
| 2009073868 | Jun 2009 | WO |
| 2009075985 | Jun 2009 | WO |
| 2009114341 | Sep 2009 | WO |
| 2009118682 | Oct 2009 | WO |
| 2009118682 | Oct 2009 | WO |
| 2009118682 | Oct 2009 | WO |
| 2009118683 | Oct 2009 | WO |
| 2009118683 | Oct 2009 | WO |
| 2009118683 | Oct 2009 | WO |
| 2009136358 | Nov 2009 | WO |
| 2009136358 | Nov 2009 | WO |
| 2009140536 | Nov 2009 | WO |
| 2009140539 | Nov 2009 | WO |
| 2009140539 | Nov 2009 | WO |
| 2009140543 | Nov 2009 | WO |
| 2009140551 | Nov 2009 | WO |
| 2010014116 | Feb 2010 | WO |
| 2010062662 | Jun 2010 | WO |
| 2010065043 | Jun 2010 | WO |
| 2010262410 | Jun 2010 | WO |
| 2010002960 | Jul 2010 | WO |
| 2010120315 | Oct 2010 | WO |
| 2011049985 | Apr 2011 | WO |
| 2011110933 | Sep 2011 | WO |
| 2012024538 | Feb 2012 | WO |
| 2012024540 | Feb 2012 | WO |
| 2012100263 | Jul 2012 | WO |
| 2014143021 | Sep 2014 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| Japanese Patent Application No. 2016-160797. Rejection dated Mar. 27, 2018. 13 pages. |
| European Application No. 17209600, Extended European Search Report dated Apr. 10, 2018. 6 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 15/164,806, filed May 25, 2016. Corrected Notice of Allowance dated May 10, 2018. 4 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 15/213,193, filed Jul. 18, 2016. First Named Inventor: Ledenev. Office Action dated Jan. 19, 2018. 15 pages. |
| Vazquez, et al., The Tapped-Inductor Boost Converter. © 2007 IEEE. 6 pages. |
| European Patent Application No. 17150670.2 Office Action dated Jan. 29, 2018. 9 pages. |
| Chinese Patent Application No. 201380076592.9. English Translation of the 3rd Notification of Office Action, dated Feb. 7, 2018. 13 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 15/164,806, filed May 25, 2016. Notice of Allowance dated Mar. 9, 2018. 8 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 15/164,806, filed May 25, 2016. Corrected filing receipt dated Mar. 14, 2018. 3 pages. |
| Solar Sentry Corp., Protecting Solar Investment “Solar Sentry's Competitive Advantage”, 4 pages estimated as Oct. 2008. |
| Anon Source; International Symposium on Signals, Circuits and Systems, Jul. 12-13, 2007; Iasi, Romania; Publisher: Institute of Electrical and Electroncis Engineers Computer Society; Abstract. |
| Bascope, G.V.T.; Barbi, I; “Generation of a Family of Non-isolated DC-DC PWM Converters Using New Three-state Switching Cells;” 2000 IEEE 31st Annual Power Electronics Specialists Conference in Galway, Ireland; vol. 2, Abstract. |
| Bower, et al. “Innovative PV Micro-Inverter Topology Eliminates Electrolytic Capacitors for Longer Lifetime,” 1-4244-0016-3-06 IEEE p. 2038 (2006). |
| Cambridge Consultants, Interface Issue 43, Autumn 2007. |
| Case, M.J.; “Minimum Component Photovoltaic Array Maximum Power Point Tracker,” Vector (Electrical Engineering), Jun. 1999; Abstract. |
| Tse, K.K.et al. “A Novel Maximum Power Point Tracking Technique for PV Panels;” Dept. of Electronic Engineering, City University of Hong Kong; Source: PESC Record—IEEE Annual Power Electronics Specialists Conference, v 4, 2001, p. 1970-1975, Jun. 17-21, 2001; Abstract. |
| Cuadras, A; Ben Amor, N; Kanoun, O; “Smart Interfaces for Low Power Energy Harvesting Systems,” 2008 IEEE Instrumentation and Measurement Technology Conference May 12-15, 2008 in Victoria, BC Canada; Abstract. |
| Dallas Semiconductor; Battery I.D. chip from Dallas Semiconductor monitors and reports battery pack temperature, Bnet World Network, Jul. 10, 1995. |
| De Doncker, R. W.; “Power Converter for PV-Systems,” Institute for Power Electrical Drives, RWTH Aachen Univ. Feb. 6, 2006. |
| de Haan, S.W.H., et al; Test results of a 130W AC module, a modular solar AC power station, Photovoltaic Energy conversion, 1994; Conference Record of the 24th IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference Dec. 5-9, 1994; 1994 IEEE First World Conference, vol. 1, pp. 925-928. |
| Dehbonei, Hooman; Corp author(s): Curtin University of Technology, School of Electrical and Computer Engineering; 2003; Description: xxi, 284 leaves; ill.; 31 cm. Dissertation: Thesis. Abstract. |
| Jung, D; Soft Switching Boost Converter for Photovoltaic Power Generation System, 2008 13th International Power Electronics and Motion Control Conference (EPE-PEMC 2008). |
| Duan, Rouo-Yong; Chang, Chao-Tsung; “A Novel High-efficiency Inverter for StAMPT-alone and Grid-connected Systems,” 2008 3rd IEEE Conference on Industrial Electronics and Applications in Singapore, Jun. 3-5, 2008; Article No. 4582577. Abstract. |
| Duncan, Joseph, A Global Maximum Power Point Tracking DC-DC Converter, Massachussetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science Dissertation; Jan. 20, 2005. |
| Edelmoser, K. H. et al.; High Efficiency DC-to-AC Power Inverter with Special DC Interface; Professional Paper, ISSN 0005-1144, Automatika 46 (2005) 3-4, 143-148. |
| Enrique, J.M.; Duran, E; Sidrach-de-Cadona, M; Andujar, JM; “Theoretical Assessment of the Maximum Power Point Tracking Efficiency of Photovoltaic Facilities with Different Converter Topologies;” Source: Solar Energy 81, No. 1 (2007); 31 (8 pages). |
| Enslin, J.H.R.; “Integrated Photovoltaic Maximum Power Point Tracking Converter;” Industrial Electronics, IEEE Transactions on vol. 44, Issue 6, Dec. 1997, pp. 769-773. |
| Ertl, H; Kolar, J.W.; Zach, F.C.; “A Novel Multicell DC-AC Converter for Applications in Renewable Energy Systems;” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, Oct. 2002; vol. 49, Issue 5, Abstract. |
| Esmaili, Gholamreza; Application of Advanced Power Electronics in Renewable Energy Sources and Hygrid Generating Systems, Ohio State University, Graduate Program in Electrical and Computer Engineering, 2006, Dissertation. |
| Gomez, M; “Consulting in the solar power age,” IEEE-CNSV: Consultants' Network of Silicon Valley, Nov. 13, 2007. |
| Guo, G.Z.; “Design of a 400W, 1 Omega, Buck-boost Inverter for PV Applications,” 32nd Annual Canadian Solar Energy Conference, Jun. 10, 2007. |
| Hashimoto et al; “A Novel High Performance Utility Interactive Photovoltaic Inverter System,” Department of Electrical Engineering, Tokyo Metropolitan University, 1-1 Miinami-Osawa, Hachioji, Tokyo, 192-0397, Japan; p. 2255, Aug. 6, 2002. |
| Ho, Billy M.T.; “An Integrated Inverter with Maximum Power Tracking for Grid-Connected PV Systems;” Department of Electronic Engineering, City University of Hong Kong; Conference Proceedings, 19th Annual IEEE Applied Power Electronics Conference and Exposition, Feb. 22-26, 2004; p. 1559-1565. |
| http://www.solarsentry.com; Protecting Your Solar Investment, 2005, Solar Sentry Corp. |
| Hua, C et al; “Control of DC-DC Converters for Solar energy System with Maximum Power Tracking,” Department of Electrical Engineering; National Yumin University of Science & Technology, Taiwan; vol. 2, Nov. 9-14, 1997; pp. 827-832. |
| International Application filed Apr. 15, 2008, Serial No. PCT/US08/60345. |
| International Application filed Jul. 18, 2008, Serial No. PCT/US08/70506. |
| International Application filed Mar. 14, 2008, Serial No. PCT/US08/57105. |
| International Application filed Oct. 10, 2008, Serial No. PCT/US08/79605. |
| International Application No. PCT/US08/57105, International Search Report dated Jun. 25, 2008. |
| International Application No. PCT/US08/57105, Written Opinion dated Jun. 25, 2008. |
| International Application No. PCT/US08/60345, International Search Report dated Aug. 18, 2008. |
| International Application No. PCT/US08/60345, Written Opinion dated Aug. 18, 2008. |
| International Application No. PCT/US08/70506, International Search Report dated Sep. 26, 2008. |
| International Application No. PCT/US08/70506, Written Opinion dated Sep. 26, 2008. |
| Joo, Hyuk Lee; “Soft Switching Multi-Phase Boost Converter for Photovoltaic System,” Power Electronics and Motion Control Conference, 2008. EPE-PEMC 2008. 13th Sep. 1, 2008. |
| Kaiwei, Yao, Mao, Ye; Ming, Xu; Lee, F.C.; “Tapped-inductor Buck Converter for High-step-down DC-DC Conversion,” IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, vol. 20, Issue 4, Jul. 2005; Abstract. |
| Kang, F et al; Photovoltaic Power Interface Circuit Incorporated with a Buck-boost Converter and a Full-bridge Inverter;' doi:10.1016-j.apenergy.2004.10.009. |
| Kern, G; “SunSine (TM)300: Manufacture of an AC Photovoltaic Module,” Final Report, Phases I & II, Jul. 25, 1995-Jun. 30, 1998; National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Mar. 1999; NREL-SR-520-26085. |
| Kretschmar, K et al; “An AC Converter with a Small DC Link Capacitor for a 15kW Permanent Magnet Synchronous Integral Motor,Power Electronics and Variable Speed Drive,” 1998;7th International Conference; Conf. Publ. No. 456; Sep. 21-23, 1998; pp. 622-625. |
| Kroposki, H. Thomas and Witt, B & C; “Progress in Photovoltaic Components and Systems,” National Renewable Energy Laboratory, May 1, 2000; NREL-CP-520-27460. |
| Kuo, J.-L.; “Duty-based Control of Maximum Power Point Regulation for Power Converter in Solar Fan System with Battery Storage,” Proceedings of the Third IASTED Asian Conference, Apr. 2, 2007, Phuket, Thialand. |
| Lim, Y.H. et al; “Simple Maximum Power Point Tracker for Photovoltaic Arrays,” Electronics Letters May 25, 2000; vol. 36, No. 11. |
| Linear Technology Specification Sheet, LTM4607, estimated as Nov. 14, 2007. |
| Matsuo, H et al; Novel Solar Cell Power Supply System using the Multiple-input DC-DC Converter; Telecommunications Energy Conference, 1998; INTELEC, 20th International, pp. 797-802. |
| Mutoh, Nobuyoshi, “A Controlling Method for Charging Photovoltaic Generation Power Obtained by a MPPT Control Method to Series Connected Ultra-electric Double Layer Capacitors;” Intelligent Systems Department, Faculty of Engineering, Graduate School of Tokyo; 39th IAS Annual Meeting (IEEE Industry Applications Society); v 4, 2004, Abstract. |
| Mutoh, Nobuyoshi; A Photovoltaic Generation System Acquiring Efficiently the Electrical Energy Generated with Solar Rays,; Graduate School of Tokyo, Metropolitan Institute of Technology; Source: Series on Energy and Power Systems, Proceedings of the Fourth IASTED International Conference on Power and Energy Systems, Jun. 28-30, 2004; Abstract. |
| Nishida, Yasuyuki, “A Novel Type of Utility-interactive Inverter for Photovoltaic System,” Conference Proceedings, IPEMC 2004; 4th International Power and Electronics Conference, Aug. 14-16, 2004; Xian Jiaotong University Press, Xian, China; Abstract. |
| Oldenkamp, H. et al; AC Modules: Past, Present and Future, Workshop Installing the Solar Solution; pp. 22-23; Jan. 1998; Hatfield, UK. |
| Power Article, Aerospace Systems Lab, Washington University, St. Louis, MO; estimated at Sep. 2007. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 11/333,005, filed Jan. 17, 2006, First Named Inventor Gordon E. Presher, Jr. |
| Quan, Li; Wolfs, P; “An Analysis of the ZVS Two-inductor Boost Converter Under Variable Frequency Operation,” IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, Central Queensland University, Rockhamton, Qld, AU; vol. 22, No. 1, Jan. 2007; pp. 120-131. Abstract. |
| Rajan, Anita; “Maximum Power Point Tracker Optimized for Solar Powered Cars;” Society of Automotive Engineers, Transactions, v 99, n Sect 6, 1990, Abstract. |
| Reimann, T, Szeponik, S; Berger, G; Petzoldt, J; “A Novel Control Principle of Bi-directional DC-DC Power Conversion,” 28th Annual IEEE Power Electroncis Specialists Conference, St. Louis, MO Jun. 22-27, 1997; vol. 2, Abstract. |
| Rodriguez, C; “Analytic Solution to the Photovoltaic Maximum Power Point Problem;” IEEE Transactions of Power Electronics, vol. 54, No. 9, Sep. 2007. |
| Roman, E et al; “Intelligent PV Module for Grid-Connected PV Systems;” IEEE Transactions of Power Electronics, vol. 53, No. 4, Aug. 2006. |
| Russell, M.C. et al; “The Massachusetts Electric Solar Project: A Pilot Project to Commercialize Residential PC Systems,” Photovoltaic Specialists Conference 2000; Conference Record of the 28th IEEE; pp. 1583-1586. |
| SatCon Power Systems, PowerGate Photovoltaic 50kW Power Converter System; Spec Sheet; Jun. 2004. |
| Schekulin, Dirk et al; “Module-integratable Inverters in the Power-Range of 100-400 Watts,” 13th European Photovoltaic Solar Energy Conference, Oct. 23-27, 1995; Nice, France; p. 1893-1896. |
| Shimizu, et al; “Generation Control Circuit for Photovoltaic Modules,” IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics; vol. 16, No. 3, May 2001. |
| Siri, K; “Study of System Instability in Current-mode Converter Power Systems Operating in Solar Array Voltage Regulation Mode,” Dept. of Electrical and Electronic Systems, Aerospace Corp., El Segundo, CA; Feb. 6-10, 2000 in New Orleans, LA, 15th Annual IEEE Applied Power Electronics Conference and Exposition, Abstract. |
| solar-electric.com; Northern Arizona Wind & Sun, All About MPPT Solar Charge Controllers; Nov. 5, 2007. |
| Takahashi, I. et al; “Development of a Long-life Three-phase Flywheel UPS Using an Electrolytic Capacitorless Converter-inverter,” 1999 Scripta Technica, Electr. Eng. Jpn, 127(3); 25-32. |
| United States Provisional Application filed Dec. 6, 2006, U.S. Appl. No. 60/868,851. |
| United States Provisional Application filed Dec. 6, 2006, U.S. Appl. No. 60/868,893. |
| United States Provisional Application filed Dec. 7, 2006, U.S. Appl. No. 60/868,962. |
| United States Provisional Application filed Mar. 26, 2007, U.S. Appl. No. 60/908,095. |
| United States Provisional Application filed May 9, 2007, U.S. Appl. No. 60/916,815. |
| United States Provisional Application filed Nov. 15, 2007, U.S. Appl. No. 60/986,979. |
| United States Provisional Application filed Oct. 15, 2007, U.S. Appl. No. 60/980,157. |
| United States Provisional Application filed Oct. 23, 2007, U.S. Appl. No. 60/982,053. |
| Walker, G.R. et al; “Cascaded DC-DC Converter Connection of Photovoltaic Modules,” IEEE Transactions of Power Electronics, vol. 19, No. 4, Jul. 2004, 10 pages. |
| Walker, G.R. et al; “PV String Per-Module Power Point Enabling Converters,” School of Information Technology and Electrical Engineering; The University of Queensland, presented at the Australasian Universities Power Engineering Conference, Sep. 28-Oct. 1, 2003 in Christchurch; AUPEC2003. |
| Wang, Ucilia; Greentechmedia; “National semi casts solarmagic;” www.greentechmedia.com; Jul. 2, 2008. |
| Xue, John, “PV Module Series String Balancing Converters,” Supervised by Geoffrey Walker, Nov. 6, 2002; University of Queensland, School of Information Technology and Electrical Engineering. |
| Yuvarajan, S; Dachuan, Yu; Shanguang, Xu; “A Novel Power Converter for Photovoltaic Applications,” Journal of Power Sources, Sep. 3, 2004; vol. 135, No. 1-2, pp. 327-331. |
| Feuermann, D. et al., Reversible low solar heat gain windows for energy savings. Solar Energy vol. 62, No. 3, pp. 169-175, 1998. |
| Román, E., et al. Experimental results of controlled PV module for building integrated PV systems; Science Direct; Solar Energy, vol. 82, Issue 5, May 2008, pp. 471-480. |
| Linares, L., et al. Improved Energy Capture in Series String Photovoltaics via Smart Distributed Power Electronics; Proceedings APEC 2009: 24th Annual IEEE Applied Power Electronics Conference. Washington, D.C., Feb. 2009. |
| Chen, J., et al. Buck-Boost PWM Converters Having Two Independently Controlled Switches, IEEE Power Electronics Specialists Conference, Jun. 2001, vol. 2, pp. 736-741. |
| Chen, J., et al. A New Low-Stress Buck-Boost Converter for Universal-Input PFC Applications, IEEE Applied Power Electronics Conference, Feb. 2001. |
| Walker, G. et al. PhotoVoltaic DC-DC Module Integrated Converter for Novel Cascaded and Bypass Grid Connection Topologies—Design and Optimisation, 37th IEEE Power Electronics Specialists Conference / Jun. 18-22, 2006, Jeju, Korea. |
| Esram, T., Chapman, P.L., “Comparison of Photovoltaic Array Maximum Power Point Tracking Techniques,” Energy Conversion, IEEE Transactions, Vo. 22, No. 2, pp. 439-449, Jun. 2007. |
| Knaupp, W. et al., Operation of a 10 kW PV facade with 100 W AC photovoltaic modules, 25th PVSC; May 13-17, 1996; Washington, D.C. |
| Schoen.T. J. N., BIPV overview & getting PV into the marketplace in the Netherlands, The 2nd World Solar Electric Buildings Conference: Sydney Mar. 8-10, 2000. |
| Stern M., et al. Development of a Low-Cost Integrated 20-kW-AC Solar Tracking Subarray for Grid-Connected PV Power System Applications—Final Report, National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Jun. 1998. |
| Verhoeve, C.W.G., et al., Recent Test Results of AC-Module inverters, Netherlands Energy Research Foundation ECN, 1997. |
| International Application No. PCT/US08/57105, International Preliminary Report on Patentability, dated Mar. 12, 2010. |
| International Application No. PCT/US08/70506 corrected International Preliminary Report on Patentability, dated Jun. 25, 2010. |
| International App. No. PCT/US09/41044, Search Report dated Jun. 5, 2009. |
| International App. No. PCT/US09/41044, Written Opinion dated Jun. 5, 2010. |
| International App. No. PCT/US08/79605, Search Report dated Feb. 3, 2009. |
| International App. No. PCT/US08/79605, Written Opinion dated Feb. 3, 2009. |
| International App. No. PCT/US08/80794, Search Report dated Feb. 23, 2009. |
| International App. No. PCT/US08/80794, Written Opinion dated Feb. 23, 2009. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 12/363,709, Accelerated Examination Support Document filed Jan. 30, 2009. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 12/363,709, First Amended Accelerated Examination Support Document filed Jul. 15, 2009. |
| National Semiconductor News Release—National semiconductor's SolarMagic Chipset Makes Solar Panels “Smarter” May 2009. |
| SM3320 Power Optimizer Specifications; SolarMagic Power Optimizer Apr. 2009. |
| Jung, et al. DC-Link Ripple Reduction of Series-connected Module Integrated Converter for Photovoltaic Systems. International Conference of Power Electronics—ECCE Asia May 30-Jun. 2, 2011. 4 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/503,011, filed Apr. 19, 2012. First Named Inventor: Anatoli Ledenev. Notice of Allowance dated Jun. 29, 2016. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/934,102, filed Jul. 2, 2013. First Named Inventor: Anatoli Ledenev. Notice of Allowance dated Jun. 30, 2016. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/254,666, filed Sep. 2, 2011. First Named Inventor: Robert M. Porter. Notice of Allowance dated Jul. 14, 2016. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 15/181,174, filed Jun. 13, 2016. First Named Inventor: Anatoli Ledenev. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 15/094,803, filed Apr. 8, 2016. First Named Inventor: Robert M. Porter. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 15/164,806, filed May 25, 2016. First Named Inventor: Anatoli Ledenev. |
| Japanese Application No. 2004-046358, published Feb. 9, 2005. Filed Feb. 23, 2004. First Named Inventor: Yoshitake Akira. Abstract only. 1 page. |
| Japanese Application No. 06-318447, filed Dec. 21, 1994. First Named Inventor: Tanaka Kunio. Abstract only. 1 page. |
| European Application No. 0677749A3, filed Apr. 13, 1995. First Named Inventor: Takehara. Abstract only, 2 pages. |
| Patent Interference No. 106,054(JTM), declared Jun. 1, 2016. Senior Party: Meir Adest; Junior Party: Anatoli Ledenev. |
| International Patent Application Publication No. 2009/007782A4, published Jan. 15, 2009. Applicant: SolarEdge Ltd. Abstract and Claims only. 5 pages. |
| International Patent Application Publication No. 2009/072075A3, published Jun. 11, 2009. Applicant: SolarEdge Ltd. Abstract and Search Report. 4 pages. |
| European Patent Application No. EP0964457A3, published May 24, 2006. Applicant: Canon Kabushiki Kaisha. Abstract and Search Report. 4 pages. |
| European Patent Application No. EP0978884A3, published Mar. 22, 2000. Applicant: Canon Kabushiki Kaisha. Abstract and Search Report. 4 pages. |
| European Patent Application No. EP1120895A3, published May 6, 2004. Applicant: Murata Manufacturing Co., Ltd. Abstract and Search Report. 3 pages. |
| Japanese Patent No. 05003678A, published Jan. 8, 1993. Applicant: Toshiba F EE Syst KK, et al. Abstract only. 1 page. |
| Japanese Patent No. 6035555A, published Feb. 10, 1994. Applicant: Japan Storage Battery Co. Ltd. Abstract only. 1 page. |
| Japanese Patent No. 06141261A, published May 20, 1994. Applicant: Olympus Optical Co. Ltd. Abstract only. 1 page. |
| Japanese Patent No. 7026849A, published Jan. 27, 1995. Applicant: Sekisui House Ltd. Abstract only. 1 page. |
| Japanese Patent No. 07222436A, published Aug. 18, 1995. Applicant: Meidensha Corp. Abstract only. 1 page. |
| Japanese Patent No. 08033347A, published Feb. 2, 1996. Applicant: Hitachi Ltd et al. Abstract only. 1 page. |
| Japanese Patent No. 08066050A, published Mar. 8, 1996. Applicant: Hitachi Ltd. Abstract only. 1 page. |
| Japanese Patent No. 08181343A, published Jul. 12, 1996. Applicant: Sharp Corp. Abstract only. 1 page. |
| Japanese Patent No. 8204220A, published Aug. 9, 1996. Applicant: Mistubishi Electric Corp. Abstract only. 1 page. |
| Japanese Patent No. 09097918A, published Apr. 8, 1997. Applicant: Canon Inc. Abstract only. 1 page. |
| Japanese Patent No. 056042365A, published Apr. 20, 1981. Applicant: Seiko Epson Corp. Abstract only. 1 page. |
| Japanese Patent No. 60027964A, published Feb. 13, 1985. Applicant: NEC Corp. Abstract only. 1 page. |
| Japanese Patent No. 60148172A, published Aug. 5, 1985. Applicant: Seikosha Co. Ltd. Abstract only. 1 page. |
| Japanese Patent No. 62154121A, published Jul. 9, 1987. Applicant: Kyocera Corp. Abstract only. 1 page. |
| Japanese Patent No. 2000020150A, published Jan. 21, 2000. Applicant: Toshiba Fa Syst Eng Corp et al. Abstract only. 1 page. |
| Japanese Patent No. 2002231578A, published Aug. 16, 2002. Applicant: Meidensha Corp. Abstract only. 1 page. |
| Japanese Patent No. 07058843A, published Mar. 3, 1995. Applicant: Matsushita Electric Ind. Co. Ltd. Abstract only. 1 page. |
| Japanese Patent Application No. 2007104872A, published Apr. 19, 2007. Applicant: Ebara Densan Ltd. Abstract only. 1 page. |
| Japanese Patent Application No. 2007225625A, filed Sep. 6, 2007. Applicant: Ahei Toyoji et al. Abstract only. 1 page. |
| Japanese Patent Application No. 2001086765A, filed Mar. 30, 2001. Applicant: Powerware Corp. Abstract only. A page. |
| Korean Patent Application No. 102005-7008700, filed May 13, 2005. Applicant: Exar Corporation. Abstract only. 2 pages. |
| Korean Patent Application No. 102004-0099601, filed Dec. 1, 2004. Applicant: Lee, Seong Ryong. Abstract only. 2 pages. |
| Korean Patent Application No. 102007-0036528, filed Apr. 13, 2007. Applicant: Industry-Academic Coop Foundation of Kyungnam Univ. Abstract only. 2 pages. |
| International Application Publication No. WO2006/013600A3, published Feb. 9, 2006. Applicant: Universita Degli Studi DiRoma “La Sapienza”. Abstract and Search Report. 5 pages. |
| International Application Publication No. 2006/048689A3, published May 11, 2006. Applicant: Enecsys Ltd. Abstract and Search Report. 7 pages. |
| International Application Publication No. 2009/140551A3, published Nov. 19, 2009. Applicant: National Semiconductor Corp. Abstract and Search Report. 3 pages. |
| International Application Publication No. 2009/140543A3, published Nov. 19, 2009. Applicant: National Semiconductor Corp. Abstract and Search Report. 4 pages. |
| International Application Publication No. 2009/140536A3, published Nov. 19, 2009. Applicant: National Semiconductor Corp. Abstract and Search Report. 4 pages. |
| Japanese Patent No. 09148613A, filed Jun. 6, 1997. Applicant: Sanyo Electric Co Ltd. Abstract only. 1 page. |
| International Application Publication No. 2010/062662A3, published Jun. 3, 2010. Applicant: Tigo Energy, Inc. Abstract and Search Report. 4 pages. |
| International Application Publication No. 2009/114341A3, published Sep. 17, 2009. Applicant: Tigo Energy, Inc. Abstract and Search Report. 3 pages. |
| International Application Publication No. 2009/075985A3, published Jun. 18, 2009. Applicant: Tigo Energy, Inc. Abstract and Search Report. 4 pages. |
| International Application Publication No. 2009/064683A3, published May 22, 2009. Applicant: Tigo Energy, Inc. Abstract and Search Report. 3 pages. |
| International Application Publication No. 2009/059028A3, published May 7, 2009. Applicant: Tigo Energy, Inc. Abstract and Search Report. 3 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 62/385,032, filed Sep. 8, 2016. First Named Inventor: Anatoli Ledenev. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 15/262,916, filed Sep. 12, 2016. First Named Inventor: Robert M. Porter. |
| NFPA Article 690 Solar Photovoltaic Systems, 70 National Electrical Code 70-545-90-566 (2005); 16 pages. |
| Patent Interference No. 106,054(JTM), declared Jun. 1, 2016. Senior: Meir Adest; Junior Party: Anatoli Ledenev; Second Declaration of Eric A. Seymour dated Sep. 23, 2016; 108 pages. |
| Patent Interference No. 106,054(JTM), declared Jun. 1, 2016. Senior: Meir Adest; Junior Party: Anatoli Ledenev; Declaration of Eric A. Seymour dated Sep. 9, 2016; 32 pages. |
| Patent Interference No. 106,054(JTM), declared Jun. 1, 2016. Senior: Meir Adest; Junior Party: Anatoli Ledenev; Declaration of Marc E. Herniter in Support of Motion 1, dated Sep. 9, 2016. 38 pages. |
| Patent Interference No. 106,054(JTM), declared Jun. 1, 2016. Senior: Meir Adest; Junior Party: Anatoli Ledenev; Declaration of Marc E. Herniter in Support of Motion 2, dated Sep. 9, 2016. 24 pages. |
| Patent Interference No. 106,054(JTM), declared Jun. 1, 2016. Senior: Meir Adest; Junior Party: Anatoli Ledenev; First Redeclaration entered Jun. 30, 2016. 6 pages. |
| Patent Interference No. 106,054(JTM), declared Jun. 1, 2016. Senior: Meir Adest; Junior Party: Anatoli Ledenev; Adest List of Proposed Motions dated Jul. 20, 2016. 5 pages. |
| Patent Interference No. 106,054(JTM), declared Jun. 1, 2016. Senior: Meir Adest; Junior Party: Anatoli Ledenev; Ledenev List of Proposed Motions dated Jul. 20, 2016. 16 pages. |
| Patent Interference No. 106,054(JTM), declared Jun. 1, 2016. Senior: Meir Adest; Junior Party: Anatoli Ledenev; Ledenev Motion 4 dated Sep. 9, 2016. 29 pages. |
| Patent Interference No. 106,054(JTM), declared Jun. 1, 2016. Senior: Meir Adest; Junior Party: Anatoli Ledenev; Ledenev Motion 7 dated Sep. 23, 2016. 32 pages. |
| Patent Interference No. 106,054(JTM), declared Jun. 1, 2016. Senior: Meir Adest; Junior Party: Anatoli Ledenev; Ledenev Motion 8 dated Sep. 26, 2016. 4 pages. |
| Patent Interference No. 106,054(JTM), declared Jun. 1, 2016. Senior: Meir Adest; Junior Party: Anatoli Ledenev; Adest Motion 1 dated Sep. 9, 2016. 37 pages. |
| Patent Interference No. 106,054(JTM), declared Jun. 1, 2016. Senior: Meir Adest; Junior Party: Anatoli Ledenev; Adest Motion 2 dated Sep. 9, 2016. 33 pages. |
| Patent Interference No. 106,054(JTM), declared Jun. 1, 2016. Senior: Meir Adest; Junior Party: Anatoli Ledenev; Adest Opposition 8 dated Oct. 3, 2016. 10 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/430,388, filed Mar. 26, 2012. First Named Inventor: Adest. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 11/950,271, filed Dec. 4, 2007. First Named Inventor: Adest. |
| Linear Technology, LTC3780, High Efficiency, Synchronous, 4-Switch Buck-Boost Controller. (c) Linear Technology 2005. 28 pages. |
| Patent Interference No. 106,054(JTM), declared Jun. 1, 2016. Senior Party: MeirAdest; Junior Party: Anatoli Ledenev; Ledenev Opposition 1, filed Nov. 14, 2016. 36 pages. |
| Patent Interference No. 106,054(JTM), declared Jun. 1, 2016. Senior Party: MeirAdest; Junior Party: Anatoli Ledenev; Adest Opposition 4, filed Nov. 14, 2016. 36 pages. |
| Patent Interference No. 106,054(JTM), declared Jun. 1, 2016. Senior Party: MeirAdest; Junior Party: Anatoli Ledenev; Adest Opposition 7, filed Nov. 14, 2016. 39 pages. |
| Patent Interference No. 106,054(JTM), declared Jun. 1, 2016. Senior Party: MeirAdest; Junior Party: Anatoli Ledenev; Order Denying Request to Waive Board 122 and SO 122.6, entered Dec. 20, 2016. 6 pages. |
| Patent Interference No. 106,054(JTM), declared Jun. 1, 2016. Senior Party: MeirAdest; Junior Party: Anatoli Ledenev; Order Granting Ledenev Miscellaneous Motion 8, entered Dec. 20, 2016. 4 pages. |
| Patent Interference No. 106,054(JTM), declared Jun. 1, 2016. Senior Party: Meir Adest; Junior Party: Anatoli Ledenev; Adest Reply 1, filed Dec. 23, 2016. 25 pages. |
| Patent Interference No. 106,054(JTM), declared Jun. 1, 2016. Senior Party: Meir Adest; Junior Party: Anatoli Ledenev; Ledenev Reply 4, filed Dec. 23, 2016. 29 pages. |
| Patent Interference No. 106,054(JTM), declared Jun. 1, 2016. Senior Party: Meir Adest; Junior Party: Anatoli Ledenev; Ledenev Reply 7, filed Dec. 23, 2016. 28 pages. |
| Patent Interference No. 106,054(JTM), declared Jun. 1, 2016. Senior Party: Meir Adest; Junior Party: Anatoli Ledenev; Sep. 8, 2016 Hearing Transcript with Changes. 18 pages. |
| Patent Interference No. 106,054(JTM), declared Jun. 1, 2016. Senior Party: Meir Adest; Junior Party: Anatoli Ledenev; Exhibit 2014—Adest et al., U.S. Appl. No. 13/430,388, Amendment submitted Jan. 14, 2016. 23 pages. |
| Patent Interference No. 106,054(JTM), declared Jun. 1, 2016. Senior Party: Meir Adest; Junior Party: Anatoli Ledenev; Exhibit 2027—Deposition Transcript of Marc E. Herniter, dated Oct. 14, 2016. 246 pages. |
| Patent Interference No. 106,054(JTM), declared Jun. 1, 2016. Senior Party: Meir Adest; Junior Party: Anatoli Ledenev; Third Declaration of Eric A. Seymour, executed Nov. 14, 2016. 27 pages. |
| Maranda, et al. Optimiazation of the Master-Slave Inverter System for Grid-Connected Photovoltaic Plants, Energy Convers. Mgmt, vol. 39, No. 12, pp. 1239-1246, 1998. |
| Patent Interference No. 106,054(JTM), declared Jun. 1, 2016. Senior Party: Meir Adest; Junior Party: Anatoli Ledenev; Exhibit 2033—Deposition Transcript of Marc E. Herniter, dated Dec. 14, 2016. 109 pages. |
| Patent Interference No. 106,054(JTM), declared Jun. 1, 2016. Senior Party: Meir Adest; Junior Party: Anatoli Ledenev; Exhibit 1009—U.S. Appl. No. 12/329,525: EFS Acknowledgement Receipt, Drawings, Abstract, Claims, Specification, Declaration, Application Data Sheet, and Transmittal as filed Dec. 12, 2005; Petition and Application Data Sheet dated Apr. 12, 2013; and Filing Receipt and Petition Decision dated Apr. 19, 2013. 59 pages. |
| Patent Interference No. 106,054(JTM), declared Jun. 1, 2016. Senior Party: Meir Adest; Junior Party: Anatoli Ledenev; Exhibit 1014: Claim chart—Comparing Count 1 to U.S. Appl. No. 60/908,095. 2 pages. |
| Patent Interference No. 106,054(JTM), declared Jun. 1, 2016. Senior Party: Meir Adest; Junior Party: Anatoli Ledenev; Exhibit 1015: Declaration of Marc E. Hemiter dated Nov. 14, 2016. 22 pages. |
| Patent Interference No. 106,054(JTM), declared Jun. 1, 2016. Senior Party: Meir Adest; Junior Party: Anatoli Ledenev; Exhibit 1016: Declaration of Marc E. Herniter dated Nov. 21, 2016. 25 pages. |
| Patent Interference No. 106,054(JTM), declared Jun. 1, 2016. Senior Party: Meir Adest; Junior Party: Anatoli Ledenev; Exhibit 1018: Datasheet, SW 280-290 Mono Black Sunmodule Plus, retrieved Nov. 21, 2016 from http://www.solar-world-usa.com/˜/media/www/files/datasheets/series/sunmodule-plus-mono-black-5-busbar-datasheet.pdf?la=en. 2 pages. |
| Patent Interference No. 106,054(JTM), declared Jun. 1, 2016. Senior Party: Meir Adest; Junior Party: Anatoli Ledenev; Ledenev Notice of Filing of Continuation Applications dated Aug. 23, 2017. 3 pages. |
| Patent Interference No. 106,054(JTM), declared Jun. 1, 2016. Senior Party: Meir Adest; Junior Party: Anatoli Ledenev; Second Supplemental Order Authorizing Ledenev Motion 7 dated Sep. 13, 2016. 5 pages. |
| Patent Interference No. 106,054(JTM), declared Jun. 1, 2016. Senior Party: Meir Adest; Junior Party: Anatoli Ledenev; Supplemental Order Authorizing Motions dated Aug. 5, 2016. 6 pages. |
| Patent Interference No. 106,054(JTM), declared Jun. 1, 2016. Senior Party: Meir Adest; Junior Party: Anatoli Ledenev; Ledenev First Supplemental Notice of Related Proceedings dated Aug. 12, 2016. 3 pages. |
| Patent Interference No. 106,054(JTM), declared Jun. 1, 2016. Senior Party: Meir Adest; Junior Party: Anatoli Ledenev; Ledenev Notice of Filing of Reissue Application dated Apr. 4, 2017. 3 pages. |
| TwentyNinety.com/en/about-us/, printed Aug. 17, 2010; 2 pages. |
| International Patent Application No. PCT/US08/60345. International Prelimianry Report on Patentability dated Aug. 30, 2010. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 61/252,998, filed Oct. 19, 2009, entitled Solar Module Circuit with Staggered Diode Arrangement. |
| Parallel U.S. Appl. No. 12/682,882; Nonfinal Office Action dated Sep. 27, 2010. |
| Parallel U.S. Appl. No. 12/682,882; Examiner's Interview Summary dated Oct. 20, 2010; dated Oct. 26, 2010. |
| Parallel U.S. Appl. No. 12/738,068; Examiner's Interview Summary dated Oct. 20, 2010. |
| Parallel U.S. Appl. No. 12/738,068; Nonfinal Office Action dated Nov. 24, 2010. |
| Parallel U.S. Appl. No. 12/682,559; Nonfinal Office Action dated Dec. 10, 2010. |
| European Patent Application No. 07 873 361.5 Office Communication dated Jul. 12, 2010 and applicant's response dated Nov. 22, 2010. |
| International Patent Application No. PCT/US2008/079605. International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Jan. 21, 2011. |
| Parallel U.S. Appl. No. 12/738,068; Examiner's Interview Summary dated Feb. 3, 2011. |
| Parallel U.S. Appl. No. 12/682,882; Examiner's Interview Summary dated Feb. 3, 2011. |
| Parallel U.S. Appl. No. 12/682,559; Examiner's Interview Summary dated Feb. 4, 2011. |
| International Patent Application No. PCT/US2010/053253. International Search Report and International Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority dated Feb. 22, 2011. |
| Parallel U.S. Appl. No. 12/682,559; Final Office Action dated Mar. 3, 2011. |
| Parallel U.S. Appl. No. 12/738,068; Notice of Allowance dated Feb. 24, 2011. |
| Parallel U.S. Appl. No. 12/955,704; Nonfinal Office Action dated Mar. 8, 2011. |
| Parallel U.S. Appl. No. 12/682,882; Final Office Action dated May 13, 2011. |
| Parallel MX Patent Application No. MX/a/2010/004129 dated Jun. 3, 2011—do not cite as it is in Spanish only and only translation is in FC letter. |
| Parallel U.S. Appl. No. 12/995,704; Notice of allowance dated Jul. 19, 2011. |
| International Application No. PCT/US09/41044; International Preliminary Report on Patentabiity dated Jul. 6, 2011. |
| Parallel U.S. Appl. No. 12/682,882; Notice of allowance dated Sep. 9, 2011. |
| Parallel U.S. Appl. No. 12/682,559; Nonfinal office action dated Sep. 23, 2011. |
| Parallel U.S. Appl. No. 13/275,147; Nonfinal office action dated Dec. 29, 2011. |
| Parallel U.S. Appl. No. 13/059,955; Nonfinal office action dated Jan. 23, 2012. |
| International Application No. PCT/US10/53253; International Preliminary Report on Patentabiity dated Jan. 25, 2012. |
| Parallel U.S. Appl. No. 12/682,559; Notice of allowance dated Apr. 17, 2012. |
| International Application No. PCT/US08/80794; International Preliminary Report on Patentabiity dated May 8, 2012. |
| Parallel U.S. Appl. No. 13/079,492; Nonfinal office action dated May 16, 2012, 10 pages. |
| Parallel U.S. Appl. No. 13/192,329; Final office action dated Jun. 13, 2012. |
| Parallel CN Patent Application No. 200880121101.7; office action dated Sep. 26, 2011. |
| Parallel CN Patent Application No. 200880121101.7; office action dated Jun. 11, 2012. |
| Parallel U.S. Appl. No. 13/192,329; Notice of Allowance dated Jul. 30, 2012. |
| International Application No. PCT/2012/022266, International Search Report dated Jul. 24, 2012. |
| International Application No. PCT/2012/022266, Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority dated Jul. 24, 2012. |
| Related U.S. Appl. No. 13/275,147; Final office action dated Aug. 24, 2012. |
| Related Chinese Patent Application No. 200880121009.0, Office Action dated Aug. 31, 2012. |
| Related U.S. Appl. No. 13/059,955; Final office action dated Sep. 27, 2012. |
| Parallel SG Patent Application No. 201107477-0; written opinion dated Nov. 27, 2012. |
| Parallel JP Patent Application No. 2010-529991; office action dated Dec. 14, 2012, 7 pages. |
| Parallel JP Patent Application No. 2010-529986; office action dated Mar. 5, 2013, 3 pages. |
| Related U.S. Appl. No. 13/078,492; Notice of Allowance dated Apr. 24, 2013, 10 pages. |
| Related U.S. Appl. No. 13/275,147; Notice of Allowance dated Jun. 3, 2013, 17 pages. |
| Related CN Patent Application No. 200880121101.7; Notice of Allowance dated Feb. 17, 2013, 3 pages. |
| Related Chinese Patent Application No. 200880121009.0, Office Action dated May 31, 2013, 7 pages. |
| Parallel JP Patent Application No. 2010-529991; office action dated Sep. 5, 2013, 6 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/308,517, filed Nov. 3, 2011, First Named Inventor: Meir Adest. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/550,574, filed Nov. 21, 2014. First Named Inventor: Ledenev. Notice of Allowance dated Jun. 6, 2016. |
| Miwa, et al. High Efficiency Power Factor Correction Using Interleaving Techniques. (c) 1992 Laboratory for Electromagnetic and Electronic Systems, Massachusetts Institute of Technology. 12 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/550,574, filed Nov. 21, 2014. First Named Inventor: Anatoli Ledenev. |
| International Application No. PCT/US13/032410, filed Mar. 15, 2013. First Named Inventor: Anatoli Ledenev. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 15/213,193, filed Jul. 18, 2016. First Named Inventor: Anatoli Ledenev. |
| Japanese Patent Application No. 2016-500068, international filing date: Mar. 15, 2013, Office Action dated Sep. 30, 2016, dated Oct. 4, 2016. 8 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 15/219,149, filed Jul. 25, 2016. First named Inventor: Anatoli Ledenev. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 15/219,149, filed Jul. 25, 2016. First Named Inventor: Ledenev. Office Action dated Mar. 3, 2017. 14 pages. |
| Canadian Patent Application No. 2737134, filed Mar. 14, 2008. First Named Inventor: Ledenev. Notice of Allowance dated Feb. 13, 2017. 1 page. |
| Reissue U.S. Appl. No. 15/469,087, filed Mar. 24, 2017. First Named Inventor: Ledenev. |
| European Patent Application No. 13877614; Extended European Search Report dated Nov. 7, 2016. 8 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 15/219,149, filed Jul. 25, 2016. Applicant Initiated Interview Summary. Interview dated Apr. 4, 2017. 1 page. |
| Japanese Patent Application No. 2016-500068, international filing date: Mar. 15, 2013, Office Action dated Mar. 13, 2017 dated Mar. 15, 2016. English Translation of the Official Action. 8 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 15/612,892, filed Jun. 2, 2017. First Named Inventor: Ledenev. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 15/679,745, filed Aug. 17, 2017. First Named Inventor: Ledenev. |
| Chinese Patent Application No. 201310162669.6, 5th Notification of Office Action dated Mar. 20, 2017. 6 pages. |
| Chinese Patent Application No. 201310162669.6, Decision of Rejection dated Sep. 7, 2017. 8 pages. |
| Chinese Patent Application No. 201310162669.6, First Office Action dated Nov. 25, 2014. 6 pages. |
| Chinese Patent Application No. 201310162669.6, Search Report dated Nov. 25, 2014. 2 pages. |
| Chinese Patent Application No. 201310162669.6, Second Notification of Office Action dated Jul. 17, 2015. 8 pages. |
| Chinese Patent Application No. 201310162669.6, Third Notification of Office Action dated Jan. 14, 2016. 7 pages. |
| Chinese Patent Application No. 201310162669.6, Fourth Notification of Office Action dated Aug. 17, 2016. 7 pages. |
| Canadian Patent Application No. 2702392, Office Action dated Jul. 31, 2014. 2 pages. |
| Canadian Patent Application No. 2702392, Office Action dated Sep. 26, 2013. 2 pages. |
| European Patent Application No. 08796302.1, Office Action dated Jun. 28, 2016. 4 pages. |
| German Patent No. DE4032569A1, published Apr. 16, 1992. Translated from GooglePatent. 7 pages. |
| Chinese Application No. 201380076592.9, Second Notification of Office Action dated Jul. 28, 2017. 9 pages. |
| Chinese Application No. 201380076592.9 filed Mar. 15, 2013. First Notification of Office Action and Search Report dated Nov. 28, 2016. 11 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 15/219,149, filed Jul. 25, 2016. First Named Inventor: Ledenev. Notice of Allowance and Applicant Initiated Interview Summary dated Apr. 26, 2017. 14 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 15/181,174, filed Jun. 13, 2016. First Named Inventor: Ledenev: Office Action dated Oct. 10, 2017. 12 pages. |
| European Application No. 17150670.2. Extended European Search Report dated Apr. 7, 2017. 13 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 15/469,087, filed Mar. 24, 2017. First Named Inventor Ledenev. Applicant-Initiated Interview Summary dated Oct. 20, 2017. 4 pages. |
| Japanese Patent Application No. 2016-500068. Final rejection dated Sep. 29, 2017. English Translation. 7 pages. |
| Japanese Patent Application No. 2016-160797. Rejection dated Sep. 29, 2017. 10 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 15/793,704, filed Oct. 25, 2017. First Named Inventor: Porter. |
| Japanese Laid-Open Publication No. 2007-325371. Abstract only. 1 page. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 15/164,806, filed May 25, 2016. First Named Inventor: Anatoli Ledenev. Ex Parte Quayle Action dated Dec. 12, 2017. 8 pages. |
| International Application Publication No. 2008/125915A3, published Oct. 23, 2008. Applicant: SolarEdge Technologies. Abstract and Search Report. 4 pages. |
| International Application Publication No. 2008/132551A3, published Nov. 6, 2008. Applicant: SolarEdge Technologies. Abstract and Search Report. 7 pages. |
| International Application Publication No. 2008/142480A3, published Nov. 27, 2008. Applicant: SolarEdge Technologies. Abstract and Search Report. 5 pages. |
| Patent Interference No. 106,054(JTM), declared Jun. 1, 2016. Senior Party: Meir Adest; Junior Party: Anatoli Ledenev. Notice to Declare Interference, 8 pages. |
| Linear Technology Specification Sheet, LTC3440, Micropower Synchronous Buck-Boost DC/DC Converter © Linear Technology Corporation 2001. 20 pages. |
| Linear Technology Specification Sheet, LTC3443, High Current Micropower 600kHz Synchronous Buck-Boost DC/DC Converter © Linear Technology Corporation 2004. 16 pages. |
| Linear Technology Specification Sheet, LTC3780, High Efficiency Synchronous, 4-Switch Buck-Boost Controller © Linear Technology Corporation 2005. 30 pages. |
| Andersen, G., et al. Current Programmed Control of a Single Phase Two-Switched Buck-Boost Power Factor Correction Circuit. Aalbord University of Energy Technology, Denmark. © 2001 IEEE. 7 pages. |
| Andersen, G., et al. Utilizing the free running Current Programmed Control as a Power Factor Correction Technique for the two switch Buck-Boost converter. Aalborg University, Institute of Energy Technology. © 2004 IEEE. 7 pages. |
| Caricchi, F., et al. 20 kW Water-Cooled Prototype of a Buck-Boost Bidreictional DC-DC Converter Topology for Electrical Vehicle Motor Drives. University of Rome, “La Sapienza”. © 1995 IEEE. 6 pages. |
| Caricchi, F., et al. Prototype of Innovative Wheel Direct Drive with Water-Cooled Axial-Flux PM Motor for Electric Vehicle Applications. University of Rome, “La Sapienza”. © 1996 IEEE. 7 pages. |
| Caricchi, F., et al. Study of Bi-Directional Buck-Boost Converter Topologies for Application in Electrical Vehicle Motor Drives. University of Rome, “La Sapienza”. © 1998 IEEE. 7 pages. |
| Chomsuwan, K., et al. Photovoltaic Grid-Connected Inverter Using Two-Switch Buck-Boost Converter. Ncational Science and Technology Development Agency, Thailand. © 2002 IEEE. 4 pages. |
| Zhou, P. & Phillips, T., Linear Technology Advertisement, Design Notes. Industry's First 4-Switch Buck-Boost Controller Achieves Highest Efficiency Using a Single Inducutor. © 2005 Linear Technology Corporation. 2 pages. |
| Enslin, J. H. R., Maximum Power Point Tracking: A Cost Saving Necessity in Solar Energy Systems. Department of Electrical Engineering. University of Pretoria, South Africa. © 1990 IEEE. 5 pages. |
| Gaboriault, M., et al., A High Efficiency, Non-Inverting, Buck-Boost DC-DC Converter. Allegro Microsystems. © 2004 IEEE. 5 pages. |
| Hua, et al. Comparative Study of Peak Power Tracking Techniques for Solar Storage System. Department of Electrical Engineering, National Yunlin University of Science and Technology. © 1998 IEEE. 7 pages. |
| Kjaer, et al. A Review of Single-Phase Grid-Connected Inverters for Photovoltaic Modules. IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, vol. 41, No. 5, Sep./Oct. 2005. 15 pages. |
| Micrel, MIC2182 High Efficiency Synchronous Buck Controller. Apr. 22, 2004. 28 pages. |
| Midya, P., et al. Buck or Boost Tracking Power Converter. IEEE Power Electronics Letteres, vol. 2, No. 4, Dec. 2004. 4 pages. |
| Decker, D.K. Methods for Utilizing Maximum Power From a Solar Array. JPL Quarterly Technical Review. vol. 2, No. 1, Apr. 1972. 41 pages. |
| Roy, et al. Battery Charger using Bicycle. EE318 Electronic Design Lab Project, EE Dept, IIT Bombay, Apr. 2006. 14 pages. |
| Sullivan, C. et al. A High-Efficiency Maximum Power Point Tracker for Photovoltaic Arrays in a Solar-Powered Race Vehicle. University of California, Berkeley. © 1993 IEEE. 7 pages. |
| Viswanathan, K., et al. Dual-Mode Control of Cascade Buck-Boost PFC Converter. 2004 35th Annual IEEE Power Electronics Specialists Conference. 7 pages. |
| Walker, Geoffrey R. (2000) Evaluating MPPT converter topologies using a MATLAB PV model. In Krivda, Anrej (Ed.) AUPEC 2000: Innovation for Secure Power, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia, pp. 138-141. |
| Zhang, P., et al. Hardware Design Experiences in ZebraNet. Department of Electrical Engineering, Princeton University. © 2004. 12 pages. |
| Mohan, Ned. Excerpt from Power electronics : converters, applications, and design. © 1989, 1995. 2 pages. |
| Bower, et al. “Certification of Photovoltaic Inverters: The Initial Step Toward PV System Certification” © 2002 IEEE. 4 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 16/028,188, filed Jul. 5, 2018. First Named Inventor: Ledenev. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 15/164,806, filed May 25, 2016. First Named Inventor: Ledenev. Corrected Notice of Allowability dated Jun. 25, 2018. 2 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 15/213,193, filed Jul. 18, 2016. First Named Inventor: Ledenev. Notice of Allowance dated Jul. 6, 2018. 12 pages. |
| Chinese Patent Application No. 201380076592.9. English Translation of the 4th Notification of Office Action, dated Aug. 3, 2018. 4 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 16/028,188, filed Jul. 5, 2018. First Named Inventor: Ledenev. Filing Receipt dated Aug. 8, 2012. 3 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 15/793,704, filed Oct. 25, 2017. First Named Inventor: Porter. Office Action dated Sep. 17, 2018. 10 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 15/094,803, filed Apr. 8, 2016. First Named Inventor: Porter. Restriction Requirement dated Sep. 10, 2018. 6 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 16/028,188, filed Jul. 5, 2018. First Named Inventor: Ledenev. Updated Filing Receipt dated Sep. 21, 2018. 3 pages. |
| European Patent Application No. 17150670.2. Office Action dated Sep. 10, 2018. 7 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 15/213,193, filed Jul. 18, 2016. Corrected Notice of Allowability dated Oct. 5, 2018. 2 pages. |
| Chinese Patent Application No. 201310162669.6. Letter forwarding the Reexamination Decision dated Oct. 10, 2018. 3 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 15/612,892, filed Jun. 2, 2017. First Named Inventor: Ledenev. Office Action dated Dec. 4, 2018. 17 pages. |
| European Patent Application No. 08732274.9. Communcation/Office Action dated Nov. 13, 2018. 4 pages. |
| Indian Patent Application No. 3419/KOLNP/2015, filed Oct. 14, 2015. Examination Report dated Dec. 28, 2018. 9 pages. |
| Chinese Patent Application No. 201380076592.9. Notice of Decision of Granting Patent Right for Invention dated Jan. 10, 2019. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 15/793,704, filed Oct. 25, 2017. First Named Inventor: Porter. Notice of Allowance dated Feb. 27, 2019. 9 pages. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20160380436 A1 | Dec 2016 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 13254666 | US | |
| Child | 15262916 | US |
