Patent Grant
10982509
This application is based upon and claims the benefit of priority from prior Australian Patent Application No. 2017903245, filed Aug. 14, 2017 and prior Australian Patent Application No. 2018900744, filed Mar. 7, 2018, the entire contents of which are incorporated herein by reference.
The present invention relates to a safety plug principally for use in underground mining. The present invention has been developed as a safety plug to prevent the unintended escape of a drill rod from a drilled bore and it will be convenient to describe the invention in relation to that application. However, it should be appreciated that the invention could have other applications, particularly in the mining and construction industries, and therefore the invention is not to be understood as being restricted just to the application that will be hereinafter described.
A reference herein to a prior art is not to be taken as an admission that the prior art was known or was part of the common general knowledge as at the priority date of any of the claims.
Drill strings are used in the mining industry to drill long bores into rock strata for various reasons. One example of the use of drill strings is in underground mining and in particular, in what is known as “drill and blast” mining. In this type of mining, tunnels are created to access a body of ore, and the ore body is then blasted to dislodge the ore from the body. The drill and blast method involves drilling holes or bores into the body of ore and placing an explosive material within the bores and thereafter blasting that material. Once blasted, the ore material which has been dislodged by the explosive is retrieved and removed and once all of the ore has been removed, the process is repeated by drilling further bores and for further blasting.
The bores that are drilled are usually in the order of approximately 76 mm or 89 mm diameter. Some will extend vertically and others will extend at an angle. The bores can be of any length such as 20 m long. In order to drill the bores, drill string rods (drill rods) are progressively connected together as the depth of the bore increases. That is, a first drill rod drills the first section of the bore and once that drill rod has reached its maximum penetration into the rock strata, a second drill rod is connected to the first drill rod and the drilling continues. The drill rods can be in the order of 1.8 m long and so approximately 11 of those drill rods are required to drill a 20 m bore.
Once the bore is drilled, the drill rods are removed so that explosive can be packed into the bore. The drill rods are removed by progressively withdrawing them from the bore and disconnecting each drill rod as it exits the bore.
From time to time, drill rods can become bogged or stuck within a bore. This can occur either during drilling of the bore or during retrieval of the drill rods from the bore. While in some instances the drill rods can be dislodged from a bogged or stuck condition and can therefore be retrieved, in other instances, the drill rods become so bogged or stuck that their retrieval is not possible. In those circumstances, it is often the case that there are two or three rods left within a bore. Each of the rods can weigh between 21.5 kg for smaller 76 mm diameter rods up to 39 kg for larger 89 mm diameter rod tubes, so the average weight for a lost drill string could start at 95 kg. e/g. 1× drill bit, 1× guidance tube and 3 rods. The rods can be anywhere within the bore and often towards the upper end of the bore. This presents an obvious safety issue should the rods subsequently become loose or free within the bore allowing them to fall out of the bore. If one or more drill rods were to exit a bore in this manner, any personnel or equipment standing under the open end of the bore could be struck with potentially catastrophic results. As such, where one or more drill rods have become bogged or stuck within a bore, mine safety requirements dictate that action needs to be taken to ensure that those rods are prevented from unintentionally falling out of the bore.
One solution to the above problem is to close the open end of the bore so that the stuck drill rods are prevented from falling out of the bore. This can involve drilling further holes around the bore opening to insert rock bolts into the rock strata around the bore to support a rock plate to cover the opening of the bore. While this solution adequately solves the problem, the process nevertheless involves removing the bore drilling machinery from the tunnel in order to bring in alternative machinery for setting rock bolts and this can result in a major disruption to mining activity in terms of cost and time.
An alternative solution is to fill the bore with grout/cement to achieve the same result as the placement of a rock plate, in that the open end of the bore is shut. Again however, this requires removing the bore drilling machinery from the tunnel in order to bring in alternative grouting machinery and again this can have a significant disruption to the mining operation in terms of cost and time. In addition, both of these solutions have been proven to provide insufficient barriers to the escape of a drill rod, and are prone to operator error in terms of proper installation.
Accordingly, a simpler but equally safe solution to the problem of bogged or stuck drill rods would be desirable.
The present invention can be embodied in several different forms. Common to some of these forms is the provision of a base part that has leading and trailing ends on which one or more external spirals or threads (hereinafter “spirals”) are formed, the external spirals being provided to engage the internal wall of a bore within which the safety plug is inserted to anchor the base part within the bore. The provision of a base part of this kind allows the safety plug of the invention to be installed and anchored within a drilled bore by the engagement of the spirals of the base part with the internal wall of the bore. The safety plug can thus be rotatably driven into the bore using ordinary drilling equipment such as is used to drill the bore itself, and the safety plug will continue to travel into the bore while the rotary force is applied. When it is decided that the safety plug is at an appropriate position within the bore, the drilling equipment can be withdrawn and the safety plug will remain in place.
The invention will also include one or more expander elements as described below. Each of the base part and the one or more expander elements have a load absorption capacity for arresting the fall of a drill rod.
The present invention is provided as a safety plug such as for use in rock drilling operations, the safety plug being elongate and having leading and trailing ends and a lengthwise axis, the safety plug including:
According to above invention, the safety plug provides for different stages of load absorption. In the first stage, the base part of the safety plug is operable to react a first portion of load exerted on the plug by a falling drill rod and that first stage could be sufficient to react the entire load, such as where the drill rod falls from a relatively low height, or falls within a bore that is either sufficiently angled or is a sufficiently close fit so that the rod falls in sliding engagement with a surface of the bore and thus its speed and momentum are retarded. In this first stage, the expander elements do not transition to the active condition, although there can be some minor or lateral expansion of the one or more expander elements. However, where the load exerted by the drill rod on the safety plug is greater, the safety plug has the second stage of load absorption which is provided by the one or more expander elements expanding to engage the internal wall of the bore and via that engagement, to provide further load absorption. In other words, in the above form of the invention, a safety plug is provided which can arrest movement of a falling drill rod by the base part absorbing load and by the expander elements transitioning to the active condition to expand laterally to engage the internal wall of the bore within which the safety plug is inserted.
The base part can have any suitable form and in one form is cylindrical with a four-start spiral formed on the outside of the generally cylindrical outer surface. Alternative spiral arrangements can include one, two or three start spirals. The base part has the spiral or spirals formed on the outer surface thereof and in one form of the invention, the spirals drive the base part through a one half turn in each 350 mm of longitudinal travel of the safety plug within a bore. The generally cylindrical outer surface can be a portion of the outer surface of the base part or all of the outer surface can be generally cylindrical.
The base part can be hollow from at least the trailing end thereof and the hollow interior can be shaped to accept a drill rod or other driving implement for installing the safety plug by rotation of the base part. The hollow interior can be non-cylindrical shaped (oval shaped for example) to accept a complementary shaped driver for driving the safety plug to rotate.
The one or more expander elements can have any suitable shape and in some forms of the invention, they are formed as conical or part conical. In these forms, the narrow end of an expander element can be the leading end and the wide end of the expander element can be the trailing end. This form of expander element can be mounted so that a load applied to the leading end can cause the expander element to expand laterally or radially relative to the lengthwise axis of the safety plug as required to engage the internal wall of the bore within which the safety plug is inserted. All that is required to achieve this form of expansion is to substantially prevent movement of the expander element under load in the direction of the load so that the load causes the expander element to laterally or radially expand. The expander element can include a lengthwise or longitudinal split or gap to facilitate expansion of the expander element.
The one or more expander elements need to be mounted substantially against movement in the direction of the load although some movement in that direction can be tolerated or is acceptable as long as the one or more expander elements can still expand sufficiently laterally or radially. In some forms of the invention, the one or more expander elements can be mounted to the base part. The base part can, for example, include a mount for a single expander element and where more than one expander element is provided, the two or more expander elements can be mounted on top of each other. A plurality of expander elements can be mounted along a common axis. That axis can be the longitudinal axis of the base. Where the expander elements are formed as conical parts or actual cones, or wedges, two or more expander elements can be nestably mounted on top of each other. Likewise, the mount of the base part can be formed as a cone or wedge, so that the expander element that is mounted to the base part is nestably mounted to the base part cone or wedge. This arrangement means that as the expander element that is mounted to the base part moves relative to the base part as a result of a load exerted by a falling drill rod, the expander element will expand laterally. Moreover, any further expander elements will also expand laterally by the nested arrangement between the expander elements. This mechanism is explained in more detail below.
The leading end of the base part can include a mounting section for mounting an expander element. In some forms of the invention, the leading end of the base part can include a reduced diameter section over which the expander element can be placed or fitted. The fit can be a close fit or even a friction fit.
While the safety plug of the invention can have a single expander element, it is expected that in most forms of the invention a plurality of expander elements will be provided. Examples include two to eight expander elements or more. These multiple expander elements can be nestably mounted to each other. The dimensions of the expander elements can be such that the maximum diameter of the expander elements in the inactive non-expanded condition, is close to but less than the inside diameter of the bore within which the safety plug is inserted, so that the expander elements do not resist insertion of the safety plug into the bore and do not engage the bore surface with a force sufficient to transition to the active condition in which the expander element expand laterally to engage the internal wall of the bore. Also, the outer diameter of the expander elements can be the same as or close to the outside diameter of the cylindrical outer surface of the base part, so that the safety plug has generally the same outside diameter along its length. The external spirals will have a greater diameter but this is required for the spirals to engage the inside surface of the bore.
To ensure that the one or more expander elements do not become detached from the safety plug during manufacture, transport, storage and installation, they can be connected to the base part and/or connected together or otherwise constrained relative to each other. For this, where a single expander element is provided, it can be attached to the base part by friction, or by a frangible connection that is designed to fracture or break at a predetermined load. The connection could be a glue connection or a solder, braze or weld connection, such as a spot solder, braze or weld connection. A pin connection could be employed whereby the pin could be a shear pin that shears at the predetermined load to allow lateral expansion. The connection could alternatively be a male/female connection or a snap-fit connection.
The connection could alternatively be formed by a thin wall that extends between adjacent expander elements, and this arrangement could be adopted where the expander elements are cast as a group rather than stamped for example.
Still alternatively, the connection could be formed by interlocking or cooperating tabs, projections, catches and the like (hereinafter “tabs”) and grooves, openings, notches and the like (hereinafter “grooves”), whereby one or more tabs of one expander element are received within one or more grooves of the base part or another expander element. In one arrangement, the tabs are formed on an internal surface of an expander element for cooperation with a groove or grooves that are formed on an external surface of the base part or another expander element. This of course requires that the expander elements are at least partially hollow in order to define an internal surface, but that is assumed where the expander elements are arranged for nesting engagement. The one or more expander elements can be fully hollow. The tabs alternatively could be formed on an external surface of an expander element for cooperation with a groove or grooves that are formed on an internal surface of another expander element.
The tab of this arrangement could be a single tab and could for example, be an annular tab, which could alternatively be described as an annular projection or flange. Such an annular tab might be continuous fully about the internal surface of the expander element, or could be discontinuous, such as to accommodate a longitudinal split as described below.
In all of these connections (integral or separate—tab and groove), the connection itself can contribute to load absorption as the connection is broken or disabled. Also, the connections described could equally be made between the expander element and the base part or the between the expander elements themselves.
The one or more expander elements can be formed from metal in order to dig or bite into the facing wall of a bore when expanded. Alternatively, expander elements can be formed from plastic or rubber, such as hard plastic or rubber. Testing of a safety plug according to the invention has been conducted in relation to expander elements formed from very hard rubber (rubber having a Shore hardness of A90) and the testing has shown very high load absorption through the unique manner in which the expander elements collapse and later disintegrate. In prototyping, a 2-part pourable rubber compound known by the trade name SC 6-90 F/Urethane, was used. That compound has the same rubber hardness which is used in the manufacture of underground loader and truck tyres.
The invention is particularly suited to the use of plastic or rubber to form the expander elements. These elements can be cast or moulded with the tabs and grooves formed where required.
The tab can be a substantially circular or annular tab that is continuous about the inside of the expander element for receipt within a single groove, except at any longitudinal split that is provided. Alternatively, multiple tabs can be provided for receipt within a single groove or multiple grooves. The tabs and grooves will be of complementary shape for a close interlocking, interconnecting or cooperating fit. Three or four sets of tabs and grooves (multiple tabs and a single groove or multiple grooves) can be provided.
The tab and groove arrangement advantageously enables assembly of expander elements together by pushing them together. This allows the tab of one expander element to be received within the groove of a base part or a second expander element. It will easily be appreciated, that the respective base part and expander elements can be pushed together until such time as a tab snaps into a groove.
Expander elements of hard rubber have shown in prototype testing to be extremely simple and efficient. Advantages identified with these forms of expander elements is that they are light-weight, have a high friction coefficient, so that they efficiently frictionally engage the wall surface of a bore, they readily slide relative to each other under an impact loading via a falling drill rod, they are not corrosive and so are not expected to deteriorate or lose efficiency even if left within a bore for a period of years. The rubber material also naturally provides shock and weight absorbing/compression characteristics when engaged by a falling drill rod.
A further advantage is that a rubber expander element can disintegrate under an impact load of a falling drill rod so that parts of the expander element become trapped in the space between the falling drill rod and the internal wall of the bore, and importantly, the disintegration will tend to clog that space within the bore. Through this clogging mechanism or effect, a greater resistance to the downward travel of the drill string can be created as compared to metal expander elements that bite into the bore wall but do not clog in the same way. Testing has shown that as a drill rod descends within a bore into engagement with a rubber expander element, the expander element tends to engage against the wall of the bore and remain at the engagement position as the drill rod travels further downwards. The rubber material thus tends to squeeze into or between the sides of the drill rod and the bore wall, rather than travelling downwards with the drill rod. This enhances the resistance to the downward travel of the drill string, by providing further frictional resistance to the drill rod against the side surfaces of the drill rod.
The clogging effect described above was an advantageous, but a surprising and unexpected result. It means that less expander elements are required than would be expected to arrest the fall of a drill rod. For example, in testing, a safety plug having four hard rubber expander elements was exposed to a force of 204 KN, at a drill rod falling speed of 15.5 m/s. It was found that by the use of four hard rubber expander elements, the drill rod was arrested completely. These test conditions are expected to be double the load that the safety plug would experience in normal conditions. Accordingly, further testing was completed with three expander elements at the same load and drill rod falling speed, and still the drill rod was arrested completely. Thus, the outcome of the testing using hard rubber expander elements rather than metal elements was very beneficial, in particular the manner in which travel of a falling drill rod was arrested. Testing of a safety plug according to the invention has been conducted in relation to expander elements formed from very hard rubber (rubber having a Shore hardness of A90) and the testing has shown very high load absorption through the unique manner in which the expander elements ultimately collapse or disintegrate.
It follows that expander elements according to the invention can be formed from metal in order to dig or bite into the facing wall of a bore when expanded, or alternatively, the expander elements can be formed from plastic or rubber, such as hard plastic or rubber.
As indicated above, the expander elements can be conical parts or actual cones, or wedges. In all forms of expander elements, the expander elements need to be able to expand laterally upon a sufficient load being applied to them. To facilitate that lateral expansion, the expander elements that are formed as conical parts or actual cones can be split longitudinally, or can include a frangible longitudinal connection, or expandable longitudinal grooves, so that the conical parts or actual cones can expand.
The mechanism for lateral expansion can be via the nesting or stacking of an expander element on the cone or like component of the base part, or by the nesting or stacking of expander elements on each other. The mechanism simply requires that as a sufficient load is applied to the expander elements, they nest or stack more closely together and as a result, they necessarily laterally or radially expand (or splay outwardly). Any triangular, conical or other suitably shaped boss or spigot on the base part will promote this lateral expansion of the expander element mounted to the base part. Likewise, the shape of the expander elements will promote lateral expansion in a nested or stacked state. What is important is that the expander element or expander elements laterally expand and dig or bite into or frictionally engage the facing wall of the bore to resist movement of the safety plug in an outward direction of the bore, Advantageously, the shape and dimensions, and the material of the expander elements can be selected so that only a small lateral expansion can bring the expander elements into engagement with the facing wall of the bore so that as greater load is exerted on the safety plug, the expander elements will continue to expand or will continue to try to expand, ever increasing the load by which the expander elements engage the bore wall. This means that the same safety plug can absorb or resist drill rods of different weight and that fall from different heights because the mechanism of load absorption advantageously increases resistance as the load to be absorbed increases.
Advantageously, the construction of the safety plug according to the invention enables the bore drilling machinery that is used to drill the bore within which one or more drill rods can become bogged or stuck, to also be used to insert the safety plug. The safety plug can thus be constructed in a manner that the drilling machine can “drill” the safety plug into the bore so that the external spirals of the base part engage the facing surface of the bore and fix or anchor the safety plug within the bore. This means that there is no need to remove the bore drilling machinery from the tunnel in order to bring in alternative machinery to insert the safety plug. In fact, it is estimated that the safety plug could be installed in under five minutes without the need to substitute one machine for another, so that the disruption to mining operations is virtually negligible. Moreover, the safety plug of the present invention can be customised for different sized bores and to absorb different loads, by the appropriate selection of the external spirals of the base part and the number of expander elements.
It is to be understood that the stages of load absorption described above in relation to the safety plug disclosed herein are not necessarily separate from each other. For example, in the mechanism of the first stage described for the present invention, the base part absorbs or reacts the load of a falling drill rod by the interaction between the external spirals provided on the generally cylindrical outer surface and the facing surface of the bore. That mechanism remains alive or in place throughout the load absorption process, as the one or more expander elements cannot laterally expand without the base part continuing to resist movement of the safety plug in a direction out of the bore. What the expander elements do is to absorb dynamic load by frictionally engaging the bore wall, while there can also be energy absorption by the expander elements deforming and disintegrating, which is particularly relevant to the plastic or rubber forms of expander element.
Also, each of the interaction between the external spirals of the base part and the facing surface of the bore and the expander element lateral expansion can occur almost simultaneously, so that in effect all forms of load absorption or reaction take place together to arrest drill rod movement.
The external spirals that are provided on the generally cylindrical outer surface of the base part can be provided to rotate the base part within the bore in either a clockwise or anti-clockwise direction, or alternatively, the base part can comprise two separate sections that have counter-rotating spirals or opposite threads. These separate sections of the base part can be connected in a manner that the separate sections can rotate relative to each other about a common axis. The advantage of this arrangement is that when the safety plug is engaged by a falling or descending drill rod, the sections will tend to counter-rotate and so lock together under the engagement load, thereby resisting downward movement of the safety plug within the bore. This contrasts with a base part of a safety plug that has a single thread or spiral which can move downwardly within the bore under sufficient load by rotation of the base part. While this is not expected to occur under loads other than very high loads, the provision of two separate sections can provide an extra form of security against that movement if loads high enough to cause that movement are expected or could occur.
Advantageously, insertion of a safety plug in which the base part has two separate sections into a bore is not any more difficult than a single section base part, as the two separate sections will simply rotate in opposite directions as the safety plug is driven into a bore.
In one arrangement, the base part is formed in three separate sections, comprising a first and rear section, a second and middle section and a third and front or leading section. The front section can comprise the section of the base part on which an expander element or a group of expander elements is mounted. That front section can be a conical section and can include a connection arrangement, such as an annular groove, for accepting a projection of an expander element.
The rear and middle sections can include spiral threads which extend in opposite directions so the one section has a left-hand thread and the other has a right-hand thread. It is not important which section has which thread, as long as the left and right hand thread is provided on the respective rear and middle sections. In this form of the base part, it is important that the rear and middle sections can rotate freely relative to each other. Thus, in one form, a shaft extends from the rear section and the middle section is mounted on the shaft for free rotation. Accordingly, the shaft can be connected to the rear section or can be integrally formed with the rear section and the middle section can have a central bore which is a close but loose fit on the shaft and about which the middle section can rotate. The shaft extends along the longitudinal axis of the base part. The front section can also be mounted on the shaft and in some forms of the invention, the front section is fixed to the shaft, such as by welding or brazing or integral formation.
In the above arrangement, the front and rear sections are thus fixed relative to each other, while the middle section can rotate relative to both of those sections.
The benefit of the above arrangement is that it can provide for more firm or stable anchoring of the base part within a bore as compared to a base part that has a single direction spiral or thread. This is because, the load applied to the safety plug will be resisted by the need of the rear and middle sections to rotate in two different directions if the safety plug is to shift downwardly within the bore. This means that both of the rear and middle sections are attempting to rotate in different and opposite directions and so the sections tend to lock together and tend to resist movement of the base part within the bore.
In a particular form of base part, the middle section has an axial freedom to shift between the rear and front sections. Thus, the spacing between the rear and front sections is sufficient for the middle section to be able to shift axially relative between them and this can be achieved by the front section being mounted on a shaft that extends through the middle section and which is fixed to the rear section, with the shaft length being such as to allow the middle section axial movement between the rear and front sections.
In the above arrangement, the middle section thus has forward and rear positions relative to the front and rear sections, and can shift between those positions depending on the operational status of the safety plug. Thus, when the safety plug is inserted or driven into a bore, the middle section will tend to shift rearwardly so that it is in the rear position adjacent to the rear section and spaced from the front section. This is simply a function of the forces acting on the middle section as the safety plug is inserted into a bore. As indicated above, the rear and middle sections will rotate in different directions due to the different thread or spiral directions associated with each section. The rear and middle sections can simply abut together in this adjacent position and the forces of insertion will overcome any frictional resistance that occurs between the abutting surfaces as the rear and middle sections rotate in different directions. The abutting surfaces can for example simply be flat surfaces that are perpendicular to the longitudinal axis of the base part.
With the safety plug inserted into a bore, the rear and middle sections will remain adjacent and the middle section will remain spaced from the front section. However, upon the safety plug being struck by a falling or descending drill rod, the load, if sufficient, will tend to push the safety plug downward and that initial load can shift the front section and the rear section downward, with the middle section remaining stationary. If sufficient movement occurs, then the rear section will move away from the middle section and the front section will move toward and into engagement with the middle section. During this movement, the rear section has rotated slightly by virtue of its spiral engagement with the bore wall, but the middle section can remain rotationally stationary.
The front section can lock with the middle section once the respective sections are sufficiently proximate, and for this, facing surfaces of the front and middle sections can be formed as mating surfaces so that upon engagement of those surfaces, the front and middle sections are locked together against relative rotation. Moreover, because the front section cannot rotate relative to the rear section, this means that the rear and middle sections are locked against relative rotation. It follows that downward movement of the safety plug is resisted because downward movement requires rotation of both of the rear and middle sections, but because they need to rotate in opposite directions due to their different thread direction, their rotation is prevented.
The front and middle sections can be locked together in any suitable manner and for example, the facing surfaces of the front and middle sections can be formed with a recess or recesses in one surface and cooperating projection or projections in the other surface. These projections/recesses do not necessarily need to be aligned when the safety plug is initially installed in a bore, as they will align and mate upon slight rotation of the middle section relative to the front section.
In order that the invention may be more fully understood, some embodiments will now be described with reference to the figures in which:
It would thus be readily evident that if the drill rods 13 did fall, there would be a significant safety risk to any personnel or equipment either directly below or in the vicinity of the opening to the bore 12. The provision of the safety plug 11 therefore is intended to block the passage of the drill rods 13 through the bore 12 so that falling drill rods 13 do not exit the bore 12.
With reference to those figures, the safety plug 20 has a base part 21 and a plurality of expander elements 22 to 25, whereby expander element 22 is a leading expander element and expander element 25 is a trailing expander element. The expander elements 23 to 25 are shown as nested group and it will be appreciated that this group can alternatively comprise a single expander element 23, or as shown, multiple expander elements 23 to 25. Three expander elements 23 to 25 are shown but this number can equally be two, four or more.
The base part 21 is shown in axial alignment in
The spirals 31 are formed in an anti-clockwise spiral and in prototype forms of the safety plug 20, the base part 21 would make a half turn in 350 mm of travel. Of course, this is an example only.
The leading end 28 of the base part 21 is conical and includes an annular groove 35. As will be explained later herein, the groove 35 is provided to accept one or more projections that extend inwardly from an internal surface of the expander element 25 for connecting the expander element 25 to the base part 21. As can be seen in
The expander elements 22 to 25 are each formed to the same shape comprising a conical leading section 36 and a cylindrical trailing section 37. Each of the expander elements 22 to 25 has a lengthwise split 40 through the entire length thereof to allow for lateral expansion of the expander elements.
Moreover, the expander elements each nest together in axial alignment as is evident particularly in
The recesses 42 are spaced apart about the leading section 36 equidistantly and appropriately shaped and positioned projections 41 are provided to enter the recesses 42 when the expander element 23 is pushed onto the expander element 24. In order for the expander element 23 to push onto the expander element 24 and for the projections 41 to enter the recesses 42, the expander element 23 can expand slightly by expansion of the lengthwise split 40. Connection of the expander element 23 to the expander element 24 might require the installer to rotate the expander element 23 relative to the expander element 24 to align the respective recesses and projections for their connection, but one advantage of the illustrated arrangement is that the respective expander elements are connected together with the longitudinal split 40 of each expander element offset by 90° to an adjacent expander element. The benefit of this offsetting arrangement in relation to the respective longitudinal splits is to ensure that there is no continuous longitudinal section of the bore wall that is free from engagement by the expander elements when the expander elements are activated to splay or expand outwardly during drill string arrest. Thus, because the sections of the bore wall that are aligned with the longitudinal split of the respective expander elements are offset and not longitudinally aligned, each consecutive expander element engages the bore wall in an area not engaged by the preceding expander element. This ensures a balance in the consistency of the manner in which the bore wall is engaged by the expander elements and additionally, impact load distribution is more evenly balanced. In this respect, as the axial load increases and the expander elements expand, disadvantageously, the volumetric centre line of each expander element shifts away from the centre line of the impacting drill rods. If the longitudinal splits were allowed to be longitudinally aligned, during drill rod impact the nesting expander elements would expand and have a tendency to shift to one side, initiating a slight collective bending effect and thus affecting operational efficiency of the safety plug. But this effect is counteracted by offsetting the longitudinal splits.
The mechanism of assembly of the base part 21 and the expander elements 22 to 25 is quite simple. As shown in
The benefit of the above mentioned offsetting arrangement in relation to the respective longitudinal splits 40 is to ensure that there is no continuous longitudinal section of the bore wall that is free from engagement by the expander elements when the expander elements are activated to splay or expand outwardly during drill string arrest. Thus, because the sections of the bore wall that are aligned with the longitudinal split of the respective expander elements are offset and not longitudinally aligned, each consecutive expander element engages the bore wall in an area not engaged by the preceding expander element. This ensures a balance in the consistency of the manner in which the bore wall is engaged by the expander elements and additionally, impact load distribution is more evenly balanced. In this respect, if the longitudinal splits 40 were allowed to be longitudinally aligned, during drill rod impact the nesting expander elements would expand and have a tendency to shift to one side, initiating a slight collective bending effect and thus affecting operational efficiency of the safety plug. But this effect is counteracted by offsetting the longitudinal splits.
The lengthwise dimension of the safety plug 20 in the assembled form of
The dimensions given above are examples only and are not intended to be limiting on the invention. For example, there are two main bore sizes that are drilled, being 76 mm and 89 mm and so different sized safety plugs will required for these different sized bores. Also, current modifications to the safety plug of the invention that are still in development and that will affect the dimensions of the safety plug include reducing the dimensions of the safety plug where possible to reduce overall weight and increasing the radial load bearing capacity of the safety plug.
In practice, the safety plug 20 is inserted into the bore 26, but it is not required to be inserted up to the point at which the drill rods have been stuck. In relation to
Initial contact of the drill rod 50 with the expander element 22 will be resisted by the spirals 31 engaged within the bore wall 27. There will obviously be some compression of the expander elements 22 to 25 upon impact of the drill rod 50, but if the impact load is not sufficient, there can be negligible lateral expansion of the expander elements, particularly if the expander elements are of metal or hard rubber. Thus, upon impact of the drill rod 50 with the expander element 22 at a level which does not cause lateral expansion of the expander elements 22 to 25, the safety plug 20 will substantially retain the configuration shown in
If the impact load of the drill rod 50 on the expander elements 22 to 25 is sufficiently low, the connections between the respective expander elements 22 to 25 and between the expander element 25 and the base part 21, will not be disturbed or disengaged. That is, the projections 41 will remain engaged within the recesses 42 between the respective expander elements, and the projections 41 of the expander element 25 will remain within the groove 35 of the base part 21.
However, a greater impact load will cause the respective projections 41 to be displaced or disengaged from the recesses 42 and the groove 35. With reference to
It is to be noted that while the above discussion indicates that the projections 41 simply displace out of the recesses 42, in alternative arrangements, the projections 41 may actually break so that they disconnect from the inside surface of the cylindrical sections 37 to which they are initially attached and as a result of that breakage, the compressive movement described above can occur.
With reference to
In
While this mechanism of folding can take place in respect of each of the expander elements 22 to 25, the force required for all of the expander elements to fold in this manner is expected to be beyond the force to which a safety plug 20 would be exposed. That is, it is not expected that a drill rod 50 would fall with sufficient momentum to cause all of the expander elements to fold in this manner, but rather, it would be limited to the first expander element 22, or to the expander elements 22 and 23 only (as shown in
A greater impact can cause some lateral expansion of the expander elements, but not sufficient for the expander elements to properly engage the bore wall 27 or to cause significant expansion of the expander elements. For example, this level of impact might cause relative movement between the expander elements to the extent that any connections between them are broken or disengaged, and could cause the expander elements to engage the bore wall 27 albeit without significant force, although any engagement of the bore wall will have a load absorbing effect.
A still greater force will commence the mechanism of expander element expansion commences. Beginning with the leading element 22, it expands outward against the bore wall 27 and begins the arresting or braking effect required to slow the falling drill rods. The next expander element 23 also begins to expand with a similar effect, and this mechanism cascades in succession through to the next expander elements 24 and 25 until they are all expanded into engagement with the bore wall. Progressively, but very quickly (almost instantaneously), each of the expander elements expands into engagement with the bore wall and the falling drill rods are arrested.
A point will be reached under extreme force and with plastic or more particularly, hard rubber expander elements, where the first expander element 22 will begin to fail and deform beyond just lateral expansion and in testing, this has manifested in the expander element 22 folding over, inside out and squeezing upwardly along the side of the drill rod, in between the drill rod and the bore wall as described above. This advantageously provides further braking, as the expander element transitions into a clogging role, further assisting in arresting the movement of a falling drill rod and additionally holding fast the drill rods when stopped. Testing has shown how effective Shore A90 rubber material is when deformed into the gap between the drill rod and the bore wall.
A tube 100 is also shown in
Once assembled, the double ended wedge 95 is located within the tube 100 as is the cylindrical section 93, the wedge section 94 and the wedge section 98. The nose cone 99 will sit on the upper edge 101 of the tube 100, while the bottom edge 102 of the tube 100 will sit on the shoulder 103 of the base part 91.
In a non-collapsed condition of the tube 100, the components within the tube 100 will be substantially axial aligned. However, upon a load being applied to the nose cone 99, the tube 100 will collapse causing sliding wedge engagement of the wedge surfaces 96 and 97 against the corresponding surfaces of the wedge sections 94 and 98, thus resulting in the double ended wedge 95 being displaced laterally outwardly of the lengthwise axis of the safety plug 90 and into frictional engagement with the inside surface of the bore in which the safety plug 90 is installed. The tube 100 includes a series of spiral slots 103. These slots 103 assist or facilitate collapse of the tube 100. The surface of the double ended wedge 95 that engages the inside surface of the bore can be configured for increased frictional engagement such as by the use of ribs or a roughened outer surface. That surface could be configured to bite into the inside surface like the expander elements of the earlier figures.
A shaft 115 extends from the rear section 111. The middle section has a central bore 116 which is a close but loose fit on the shaft 115 so that the middle section 112 can freely rotate about the shaft 115. The shaft can be connected to the rear section 111 or can be integrally formed with the rear section 111. The front section 113 will also be fixed to the end of the shaft 115 such as by welding or brazing or integral formation. The front section 113 has a recess 121 for accommodating the end of the shaft 115 remote from the rear section 111. In this arrangement, the rear and front sections 111, 113 are thus fixed relative to each other, while the middle section 112 can rotate relative to both of those sections. The rear and middle sections 111, 112 include spiral threads 117, 118 which are respectively left and right hand threads.
In
If the safety plug is struck by a falling or descending drill rod, the load, if sufficient, will tend to push the safety plug downward and that initial load can shift the front section 113 and the rear section 111 downward, with the middle section 112 remaining stationary. This occurs because while each of the rear and middle sections 111 and 112 are engaged with the wall of the bore, the load applied to the front section 113 will transmit through to the rear section 111 via the shaft 115 and if the load is sufficient, the rear section 111 will rotate or unwind until the load is arrested. The front section 113 will rotate with the rear section 111 by the connection between the rear and front sections 111 and 113. However, because the middle section 112 has axial freedom along the shaft 115, it will not rotate or unwind at least under the initial action of the load.
If sufficient downward movement of the rear and front sections 111 and 113 occurs, then the front section 113 will move toward and into engagement with the middle section 112. The facing surfaces 120 and 122 of the middle and front sections 112, 113 are formed for locking (see also
The benefit of this arrangement is that the base part 110 can be anchored more firmly within a bore compared to a base part that has a single direction spiral or thread.
Advantageously, insertion of a safety plug in which the base part has two separate sections into a bore is not any more difficult than a single section base part, as the two separate sections will simply rotate in opposite directions as the safety plug is driven into a bore.
Finally,
Once a sufficient load is imposed on the expander elements 80 to 82, the frangible connections 87 will fail and the expander elements will be able to collapse together so as to laterally expand in accordance with the mechanism discussed earlier for the expander elements 22 to 24. Thus, the mechanism of expansion of the arrangement of
The expander elements used in the present invention can be made in hard plastic, or in metal as described earlier herein. In order to facilitate expansion of the expander elements, they can include multiple longitudinal grooves in the outer surface thereof, similar to the longitudinal splits 40 already illustrated, but only extending partially through the wall of the expander elements, not fully as with a split.
The expander elements illustrated in the figures and as manufactured in hard rubber, have shown in prototype testing to be extremely simple and efficient. Advantages identified with these forms of expander elements is that they are light weight, have a high friction coefficient, so that they efficiently frictionally engage the wall surface of a bore, they readily slide relative to each other under an impact loading via a falling drill rod, they are not corrosive and so are not expected to deteriorate or lose efficiency even if left within a bore for a period of years and the rubber material naturally provides shock and weight absorbing/compression characteristics when engaged by a falling drill rod.
The clogging effect of rubber expander elements has given a surprising and unexpected result. It has been found that less expander elements are required than would be expected to arrest the fall of a drill rod. For example, in testing, a safety plug having four hard rubber expander elements was exposed to a force of 204 KN, at a drill rod falling speed of 15.5 m/s. It was found that by the use of four hard rubber expander elements, the drill rod was arrested completely. These test conditions are expected to be double the load that the safety plug would experience in normal conditions. Accordingly, further testing was completed with three expander elements at the same load and drill rod falling speed, and still the drill rod was arrested completely. Thus, the outcome of the testing using hard rubber expander elements rather than metal elements was very beneficial, in particular the manner in which travel of a falling drill rod was arrested.
Where the terms “comprise”, “comprises”, “comprised” or “comprising” are used in this specification (including the claims) they are to be interpreted as specifying the presence of the stated features, integers, steps or components, but not precluding the presence of one or more other features, integers, steps or components, or group thereto.
The invention described herein is susceptible to variations, modifications and/or additions other than those specifically described and it is to be understood that the invention includes all such variations, modifications and/or additions which fall within the spirit and scope of the present disclosure.
| Number | Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017903245 | Aug 2017 | AU | national |
| 2018900744 | Mar 2018 | AU | national |
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1993749 | Pleister | Mar 1935 | A |
| 2690693 | Campbell | Oct 1954 | A |
| 2947279 | Hohos | Aug 1960 | A |
| 3216306 | Taylor | Nov 1965 | A |
| 3427919 | Lerich | Feb 1969 | A |
| 3518915 | Gutshall | Jul 1970 | A |
| 4275637 | Herb | Jun 1981 | A |
| 4378180 | Scott | Mar 1983 | A |
| 5076734 | Hipkins, Sr. | Dec 1991 | A |
| 5649789 | Denz | Jul 1997 | A |
| 5919006 | Calandra, Jr. | Jul 1999 | A |
| 7261505 | Ernst | Aug 2007 | B2 |
| 20070031196 | Bruneau | Feb 2007 | A1 |
| 20070269274 | Seedsman | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20100098500 | Weaver | Apr 2010 | A1 |
| 20100202838 | Weaver | Aug 2010 | A1 |
| 20160326828 | Phillips | Nov 2016 | A1 |
| 20180106119 | Xu | Apr 2018 | A1 |
| 20180328175 | Noonan | Nov 2018 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 2015255248 | Jun 2017 | AU |
| 624327 | Jul 1961 | CA |
| 202560273 | Nov 2012 | CN |
| 2015103661 | Jul 2015 | WO |
| 2017079808 | May 2017 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| EPO; Application No. 18188981.7; European Search Report dated Apr. 1, 2019. |
| Australian Patent Office; Application No. 2020100611; Examination Report dated Jul. 17, 2020. |
| Australian Patent Office; Application No. 2018214065; Examination Report dated Jul. 20, 2020. |
| Noonan et al., “Improving safety and production in underground mining,” (Figures 1 and 2 from cited article included) Geotechnical Engineering, AusIMM Bulletin <URL>https://www.ausimmbulletin.com/feature/improving-safety-and-production-in-underground-mining/ (Posted on Jun. 2016). |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20190048681 A1 | Feb 2019 | US |
