This invention concerns protective shields for industrial equipment, and in particular is concerned with a safety shield or cover that fits over the valves and fittings of a propane tank or other fuel gas tank as employed with powered industrial equipment, such as fork lifts, tractors, or the like.
One continuing danger in respect to gas powered vehicles and devices is that the compressed gas can escape rapidly from the fittings during installation onto the fork lift or other vehicle, and can cause freezing of tissue to the worker if the spray contacts his or her face or exposed skin. Compressed gas stored in portable steel tanks is widely used in factory and warehouse environments nationwide, for powering indoor vehicles and other equipment. The danger from the escaping gas is a concern for worker safety Typically workers are required to wear goggles, safety glasses or face mask, as well as gloves, when installing or replacing a fuel tank, but these items do not provide complete protection for the worker. Under the current laws and guidelines, employers are required to provide a hazard-free environment for their employees. According to the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), as stated in their OSHA Compliance Manual-, Personal Protection Equipment: the use of personal protection equipment or PPE, e.g., face shields, is considered a “last resort” or temporary type of protection. PPE itself can cause stress and create work hazards of its own, such as heat stress, impaired vision, and limits on mobility. For normal and ongoing operations, the first choice will always be given to elimination of the hazard in the environment, rather than relying on PPE. This doctrine is referred to as “implementing engineering controls”.
To date, no engineering controls have been developed or proposed to address the problem of liquid fuel gas and compressed gas escaping and spraying onto workers when replacing an empty tank with a full one. This need has been addressed only using PPE, such as goggles or safety glasses and gloves or gauntlets. It would by far be preferable to stop any spray of this material before reaching the worker, and not to rely on the personal protection equipment.
There is an unfulfilled need for a simple, comfortable, inexpensive, easy-to-install protective device for the tank itself, rather than relying on PPE fitted onto the worker. This would require a guard or shield that permits visual observation of the tank valve and fittings when installing or replacing the tank, and when opening or closing the tank valve, and which does not have to be worn by the worker. The solution to this problem would also require a shield or guard that can be easily slipped onto the tank over the tank valve, and can be easily removed from the tank so that it can be sent off for refilling or maintenance. The guard or shield should also be light weight and durable, without sharp edges that could cause cuts or other injury to the worker.
This invention concerns a protective shield that fits onto the flange at one end of a tank or cylinder of compressed propane or butane as used in an industrial setting, i.e., for a forklift or similar warehouse vehicle. A cylindrical rubber wall or sleeve, or alternatively an extruded sleeve formed into a cylinder, has an inside diameter that fits snugly onto the cylindrical tank flange, and has access openings to allow the worker to attach the gas fittings and to open and close the tank valve. A circular clear window is placed into an upper end of the generally cylindrical wall, and allows clear visibility of the fittings and valve. At the same time, the window blocks any gas or liquid that escapes from the tank valve from exiting out the upper end of the shield, thereby protecting the worker from an accidental spray of the liquid propane or butane (which could cause freezing of tissues). This is intended to satisfy OSHA requirements for personal safety by blocking or eliminating the propane spray hazard before a face shield or protective eyewear and facewear is needed.
Preferably, the cutouts or openings in the cylindrical shield wall include a generally rectangular wall aligned with the tank valve fitting, to allow the fuel hose to pass through, while the opening for the worker to reach through to turn the valve can be formed of crossed slots, i.e., shaped like the letter “X”. This minimizes the open area of the opening when the worker is operating the valve, which will limit the possibility of escaped fuel gas exiting through the reach-in opening. The X-shaped opening can also serve to retain the glove or gauntlet between uses, so the worker has easy access to the safety gloves.
In a preferred embodiment, the cylindrical wall of the shield is formed of an extrusion of a rubber or synthetic elastomeric resin, with ends butt welded to form a ring. A reinforcing ring is formed on an outer surface of the wall at its lower end, and at the upper end there may be a band of a distinctively colored material, e.g., bright orange or bright green, to increase the visibility of the shield. At the upper end of the cylindrical wall, at the inside surface, an inwardly directed flange locates the clear plastic disk or other window that held in place here. Other possible constructions of the shield wall are also possible.
The material of the wall may have a weakly conductive filler so that static electrical charge will dissipate, and not pose a threat of static discharge.
In a preferred implementation, the rubber cylindrical wall is about seven inches high, with a twelve-inch inside diameter, and with a clear plexiglass disk serving as the window. In some possible embodiments, the window may be partly transparent and partly opaque or translucent.
As shown in
As shown in
The protective shield 20 remains in place during operation of the vehicle 34, and when the empty tank 10 is removed, the shield can be slipped off and placed on the tank flange 12 of a fresh fuel tank.
A plan view of the window disk 30 is presented in
In an alternative construction, as presented in
The clear plastic window disk 30 (
Many alternative arrangements of the tank shield of this invention can be constructed without departure from the main principles of the invention. The cutouts or openings 24 and 28 may be reversed from what is shown here, depending upon the orientation of the associated tank valve. The tank guard should be constructed to be light-weight and durable, and the materials from which it is constructed may thus may be selected from many possible materials
In alternative embodiment, the cylindrical wall may ends joined by blind byrd insert fasteners, and other alternative fastening systems could be employed. In other possible embodiments, the wall 22 may be formed of a generally cylindrical extrusion of a suitable flexible durable material. Also there are other ways in which the window 30 can be attached or affixed into the upper end of the cylindrical wall 22, and in some possible embodiments the window 30 need not be of a circular shape. As an alternative to the more-or less solid wall 22 with only the three access opening 24, 26, 28, the protective shield may be made with upper and lower rings joined by a series of axial ribs, leaving most of the cylinder flange 12 uncovered except the protective window. In that case, the ribs may be of a more rigid material, at least in part.
While the device of this invention has been explained and illustrated with respect to a preferred embodiment, it should be understood that many other possible embodiments would be apparent from this disclosure to persons skilled in the art, without departure from the scope and main principles of the invention.
Applicant claims priority under 35 U.S.C. §119(e) of provisional patent application Ser. No. 61/645,669, filed May 11, 2013, the disclosure of which is incorporated by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2085277 | Smith | Jun 1937 | A |
2996213 | Mitchell et al. | Aug 1961 | A |
3154211 | Bobowski | Oct 1964 | A |
3285418 | Miller | Nov 1966 | A |
3848768 | Griffin | Nov 1974 | A |
4103806 | White | Aug 1978 | A |
4478345 | Edinger | Oct 1984 | A |
4600033 | Baron | Jul 1986 | A |
4899781 | Monroe | Feb 1990 | A |
4905855 | Troiano et al. | Mar 1990 | A |
5058758 | Suddeth | Oct 1991 | A |
5678864 | Brown | Oct 1997 | A |
5845809 | Garrett et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
6003540 | Bruni et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6209749 | Guess | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6247491 | Petryna | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6536462 | Laugen | Mar 2003 | B1 |
7178546 | Gremillion, III | Feb 2007 | B2 |
8720738 | Ryman | May 2014 | B1 |
20050092761 | Marganski et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140332544 A1 | Nov 2014 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61645669 | May 2012 | US |