The present invention relates to a safety system for vehicle occupants according to the preamble of claim 1, as well as a method for controlling a safety system according to the preamble of claim 4.
In addition to the acceleration sensors used in a central airbag control unit, at the present time peripheral acceleration sensors or pressure sensors are primarily used for sensing side crashes. The demands on crash detection are very high in the case of a side impact. Since the distance between the outer side of the vehicle and the vehicle occupant to be protected is very small, the decision about triggering or not triggering the side airbag or head airbag, for example, must be made in a very short time (e.g., 5-10 ms), so that these restraining devices can still inflate to provide protection. To achieve great robustness of the system with respect to unwanted triggerings of restraining devices, an additional, independent plausibilization circuit is always used when detecting side crashes on the basis of signals from peripheral acceleration sensors. This is usually accomplished on the basis of the acceleration signal from a second acceleration sensor (e.g., positioned on the vehicle tunnel). Because of the acquisition of vehicle-dynamics data such as lateral acceleration, yaw rate, steering angle and wheel speeds possible today in vehicles having ESP (or other systems), the float angle as well as the longitudinal velocity and lateral velocity of the vehicle can be estimated. This information is also used for triggering reversible restraining devices, as well as the window lifters, the seat adjuster and the sunroof (pre-safe). However, the vehicle-dynamics information alone is not sufficient for triggering irreversible restraining devices.
The German Patent Application DE 199 10 596 A1 describes a method and a system for controlling the triggering of restraining devices in a motor vehicle, provision being made to acquire actual values of the vehicle movement and to apply a triggering algorithm to the acquired actual values for generating triggering signals as needed for the triggering of at least one of the restraining devices. In so doing, the following steps are to be carried out: acquiring actual values of the vehicle movement; determining the setpoint state of the vehicle movement corresponding to the desired operating behavior of the vehicle; comparing an actual state of the vehicle movement, determined from at least a portion of the acquired actual values, to the corresponding setpoint state; parameterizing a triggering algorithm used for generating triggering signals, taking into account deviations between the actual state and the setpoint state of the vehicle movement; and application of the triggering algorithm to at least a portion of the acquired actual values for generating situation-adapted triggering signals as needed for triggering at least one of the restraining devices.
WO 90/09298 also describes a method for triggering restraining devices in a safety system for vehicle occupants, in which an acceleration signal is measured, this acceleration signal is converted by time integration into a velocity, and in which at least one threshold value is specifiable for the velocity for forming a triggering criterion. In this method, the threshold value used as triggering criterion is moreover alterable as a function of one or more state variables or past state variables of the vehicle.
The present invention offers the advantage that, because of the estimate of the float angle, the longitudinal velocity and the lateral velocity (vL, vQ) available based on vehicle-dynamics data, it is possible to ascertain the approximate direction from which a crash can be expected. In this context, it is possible, in a manner matched to the specific driving situation, to adjust the parameters for controlling the respective restraining devices, especially the pyrotechnic side airbags and head airbags, or to make available a plausibility signal for a crash detection of the airbag control unit possibly taking place at a later point of time. The objective of the parameter adjustment (e.g., lowering of noise thresholds) is an optimized detection of the more probable crash event in each case. Moreover, detection of crash severity may also be improved by estimating the lateral velocity, in that the signals to be expected from the acceleration-based or pressure-based crash sensing are compared to the actually measured data, and a corresponding crash severity may be differentiated in a lesser or more severe crash from the deviating behavior.
One especially important advantage of the present invention is the possibility of optimizing the control of the irreversible, pyrotechnic restraining devices in the case of a crash, by the simultaneous, synergetic use of vehicle-dynamics data and data of the classic side-crash sensing (pressure and acceleration). In particular, a dangerous crash may thereby be detected earlier. This offers a time advantage, especially in the event of a side crash, since because of the short crash zone, only an extremely short reaction time is available for the activation of restraining devices.
In the following, the present invention is explained in greater detail with reference to the drawing. The figures show:
First function module 21 having assigned sensors (not shown in detail here) is used for acquiring vehicle-dynamics data. In particular, values for wheel speed, braking pressure and torque of vehicle 1 are thus acquired using suitable sensors. A further function module 22 having control-unit function receives this vehicle-dynamics data and relays at least part of this data unaltered as raw data to function module 24. Secondly, function module 22 processes at least a subsection of the data received from function module 21 and, for example, calculates directional information, longitudinal velocity and lateral velocity of the vehicle, as well as the float angle of the vehicle from it. These results are relayed to function module 23. In this way, available at the output of function module 24 is, on one hand, the raw data relayed by function module 22, and additionally the quantities calculated from this raw data by function module 22, which are transmitted altogether to function module 26. Acceleration components ax, ay, az of three axes, acceleration components ayl, ayr of side impact sensors (PAS), as well as signals from yaw-rate sensors are acquired by function module 25 and passed on to function module 26. Control signals for the restraining devices such as airbag, side airbag, head airbags, window airbags and seat-belt tensioners, combined schematically in function module 27, are derived from this input data in function module 26. System 20 ascertains the estimated quantities for the float angle, as well as the longitudinal velocity and lateral velocity from the different data measured for assessing the vehicle dynamics. If, for example, the slight lateral velocity vQ in the normal driving condition exceeds a certain limit, or if by monitoring the vehicle-dynamics data in another manner a driving condition deviating from the normal condition is detected in which there is an increased risk for a lateral crash with an obstacle, the corresponding information is transmitted to function module 26. Alternatively, the increased risk of a crash may also be detected by function module 26 with the aid of sensor data made available to it by a vehicle-dynamics analysis system (e.g., via a data bus). In function module 26, by adjustment of the algorithmic parameters, the information about the increased probability of a specific crash event is now utilized to permit an early plausibilization and possibly even triggering of the restraining devices relevant for this crash. If a reliable estimate of the lateral velocity and longitudinal velocity is available based on the vehicle-dynamics data, possibly with the additional use of acceleration data from function module 26, this estimate may advantageously be used as additional information for detecting crash severity. In many cases in which an unstable driving condition (e.g., lateral breakaway, skid) precedes a crash event (see, for example, the depiction of vehicle 1 in
The advantages attainable using the present invention can be underlined based on the following examples. In a first exemplified case, vehicle 1 running off the roadway crashes with high lateral velocity vQ2 (
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
10 2004 029 817.3 | Jun 2004 | DE | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2005/051916 | 4/28/2005 | WO | 00 | 12/14/2007 |