This disclosure relates generally to firearms and, more particularly, to safety units for a hammer in a self-loading firearm.
The hammer of a typical hand-held firearm is secured in a cocked position through engagement of the hammer with a component such as the bar or trigger. The hammer is generally held in the cocked position via an engaging projection that is formed in the lower portion of the hammer. If the weapon should accidentally fall to the ground, then forces act on the component securing the hammer. These forces can lift the securing component (typically, against the force of a retaining spring), out of the projection so that the hammer is released and a shot is then triggered unintentionally.
Many proposals have been made in order to make trigger and safety devices more effective and secure. (See, for example, U.S. Pat. No. 3,962,809.) Many of these proposals are entirely effective, but are also complicated. For example, it is known to block or lift the striking spring out of the motion path of the hammer if the trigger is not pulled. However, these known devices have sliding parts which, in the case of dirty, unlubricated, or rusted weapons, are sluggish, and therefore make the pulling of the trigger to fire a shot difficult.
Furthermore, many safety parts are stressed to the point of bending, and can even possibly break. For example, even the engaging projection of the hammer could break off. If hammers of plastic are used instead of steel hammers, as was recently normally the case, then access to the centuries of materials expertise available to steel hammers is lost and a very improbable event in the context of steel hammers (namely, hammer part breakage), must be taken into consideration.
A swiveling lever has been shown in U.S. Pat. No. 5,225,612. The lever of the '612 Patent serves as a magazine safety unit and can be stressed in the safety position by the guide bar of the striking spring if the hammer of a self-loading pistol is clamped without a magazine having been inserted. However, this swiveling lever is not stressed in the direction of its transverse axis, but is instead swiveled at an angle to this axis against a stationary construction on which it is supported in a stable manner.
A safety device in which an eccentric shaft projects out, upon rotation, over the rear end of the firing pin and, thus, receives the striking hammer, is already known. Fine particulate matter that sprays through the weapon can, however, cause a particle to be caught behind the firing pin. In such circumstances, the particle passes the impact of the hammer along to the firing pin through the eccentric shaft.
U.S. Pat. No. 4,352,317 is also relevant prior art as explained below.
A hammer (1), which is swivelable around an axis (3), is depicted in all of the figures. The swiveling movement is carried out in the clockwise direction, against the effect of a striking spring (20), which is shown in FIG. 4. Upon release of the energy in the striking spring (20), the hammer (1) moves in a counterclockwise direction toward a firing pin (10).
The hammer (1) has, on its front surface facing in the direction of striking (i.e., the direction of the firing pin (10)), a contact point (9). Directly below the contact point (9), an elongated recess (11) is formed. In relation to the axis (3) of the hammer (1), the recess (11) extends in approximately the circumferential direction.
The safety unit includes a swiveling lever (5) which is mounted for pivoting about a lateral axis (7). The lateral axis (7) is located parallel to the axis (3) of the hammer (1). The center of the axis (3) is placed in front of the contact point (9) as shown in FIG. 1. The lateral axis (7) is positioned in front of, and above, the axis (3) of the hammer (1), in relation to the direction of shooting and the normal cocked position of the weapon. In the ideal case, the lateral axis (7) lies on a tangent of a circle drawn around the middle point of the axis (3) of the hammer (1) and passing through the contact point (9) if the contact point occupies the position shown in FIG. 1. Slight deviations of the lateral axis (7) from this ideal position are, of course, permissible.
In the illustrated example, the swiveling lever (5) is a two-flank lever. One of the flanks (5a) is directed toward the hammer (1). The second flank (5b) is downwardly directed.
The swiveling lever (5) can occupy two positions, namely, a first position (for example, the position shown in
On the other hand, to reach the firing position (see FIG. 2), the swiveling lever (5) is swiveled in a clockwise direction, so that the flank (5a) penetrates into the recess (11). The recess (11) and flank (5a) are sized and positioned in such a manner that the movement of the hammer (1) is not impeded by the swiveling lever (5) until the flank (5a) is located in the recess (11).
In the examples of
In the example of
An example firearm grip is shown in
From the foregoing, persons of ordinary skill in the art will appreciate that it is also possible to combine this magazine safety unit with the previously described dropping safety unit of
From the foregoing, persons of ordinary skill in the art will further appreciate that a smooth-operating safety device which avoids accidental triggering of a shot, even upon an unintended dropping of the weapon, and which also has a very high security against breakage has been disclosed. To this end, the swiveling lever (5) is rotatably supported on a lateral axis (7) near the motion path of the hammer (1) such that the free end (5a) of the lever (5) can be brought into the impact path of the hammer (1). Thus, the contact point (9) of the hammer (1) strikes on the free end (5a) of the swiveling lever (5) rather than reaching the firing pin. Simply stated, the swiveling lever (5) prevents the hammer (1) from striking the firing pin or on the firing cap of a cartridge. The lateral axis (7) is positioned approximately on an extension of the motion path of the hammer (1).
The swiveling lever (5) is independent of all other parts of the trigger mechanism. The separate swiveling lever (5) does not engage in any marginal recess of the firing pin, but instead interposes itself between the hammer (1) and the firing pin. The contact point (9) on the hammer (1) is selected in such a manner to avoid any damage to the hammer (1) which might otherwise occur from the impact on the lever (5).
When necessary, the swiveling lever (5) is swiveled into the motion path of the contact point (9). The lever (5) only carries out a swiveling movement around an axis (7), not a translational movement. The movement-impeding influence of dirt and rust is, thus, reduced to a minimum level.
When it is struck by the hammer (1), the lever (5) is only stressed in its longitudinal direction, not in the transverse direction. Consequently, breaking of the swiveling lever (5) due to this impact is excluded as a practical matter.
The lateral axis (7) supporting the lever (5) only experiences shear stress. Thus, the danger of breaking this axis/pin (7) can be minimized or at least reduced by selecting a sufficiently thick axis/pin (7).
Through a suitable configuration and formation of the swiveling lever (5), it is possible that the hammer (1) can be repeatedly cocked and released via the trigger (24), even if the swiveling lever (5) is located in its safety position. As a result, it is possible to practice with the secured weapon without the danger ever arising that a bullet possibly forgotten in the barrel will be fired.
If the safety device is connected with the trigger (24) such that the lever (5) is only swiveled out of the motion path of the contact point (9) if the trigger is pulled as shown in
In the disclosed safety devices, the hammer (1) can be blocked in any position desired. Thus, an enlarged distance is provided between the firing pin and the lever (5) as compared to the prior art. This enlarged distance ensures a particle behind the firing pin will not be able to transmit the impact of the hammer from the lever (5) to the firing pin to, thus, fire a shot.
As explained above, in the disclosed safety devices, a recess (11) into which the swiveling lever (5) penetrates upon the unsecured striking of the hammer (1) is formed closely adjacent to the contact point (9). This concept is known from U.S. Pat. No. 4,352,317. The above statements concerning the catching stop primarily concern a hammer. The transverse axis (7), around which the swiveling lever (5) can be swiveled, proceeds in parallel to the axis (3) of the hammer (1) and lies approximately on a tangent to the circular path of the contact point (9) proceeding from the point that the contact point (9) occupies if it strikes on the swiveling lever (5). This configuration is simple in constructional terms, but is extremely stable and reliable.
In the example of
The additional flank (5a) of the lever (5) can, however, be pressed by means of a spring (15) into the empty magazine shaft (13) of a multi-shot weapon. In this position, the swiveling lever (5) is located in a safety position (see FIG. 3). If a magazine is now inserted into the magazine shaft (13), then the magazine presses the flank (5a) to the side against the spring force to thereby swivel the swiveling lever (5) into the firing position. Thus, a simple but reliable magazine safety unit is created.
Both of the safety devices described (the dropping safety unit of
Although certain apparatus constructed in accordance with the teachings of the invention have been described herein, the scope of coverage of this patent is not limited thereto. On the contrary, this patent covers all embodiments of the teachings of the invention fairly falling within the scope of the appended claims either literally or under the doctrine of equivalents.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
199 59 964 | Dec 1999 | DE | national |
This patent is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/163,325, filed Jun. 5, 2002, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,604,312 which is a continuation of PCT/EP00/11888, filed Nov. 28, 2000.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
635705 | Wesson | Oct 1899 | A |
875469 | Tambour | Dec 1907 | A |
887784 | Fyrberg | May 1908 | A |
961188 | Wesson | Jun 1910 | A |
982152 | Marble | Jan 1911 | A |
2372519 | Roper | Mar 1945 | A |
2468784 | Seagraves | May 1949 | A |
2703943 | Roemer | Mar 1955 | A |
3415000 | Koucky et al. | Dec 1968 | A |
3707796 | Bielfeldt | Jan 1973 | A |
3715826 | Seifried | Feb 1973 | A |
3748771 | Piscetta | Jul 1973 | A |
3838533 | Ruger | Oct 1974 | A |
3962809 | Lee | Jun 1976 | A |
4031648 | Thomas | Jun 1977 | A |
4352317 | Wilhelm | Oct 1982 | A |
4399628 | Franchi et al. | Aug 1983 | A |
5225612 | Bernkrant | Jul 1993 | A |
5355768 | Felk | Oct 1994 | A |
5438784 | Lenkarski et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5560132 | Merlino | Oct 1996 | A |
5625971 | Tuma et al. | May 1997 | A |
5915935 | Weldle et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
6253479 | Fuchs et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6604312 | Bantle et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
133 977 | Jun 1933 | AT |
506 923 | Sep 1930 | DE |
0277922 | Oct 1988 | EP |
571.503 | May 1924 | FR |
722.555 | Mar 1932 | FR |
751.009 | Aug 1933 | FR |
802 583 | Sep 1936 | FR |
804 981 | Nov 1936 | FR |
2468 | Jan 1914 | GB |
151 196 | Sep 1920 | GB |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20030213160 A1 | Nov 2003 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10163325 | Jun 2002 | US |
Child | 10461993 | US | |
Parent | PCTEP00/11888 | Nov 2000 | US |
Child | 10163325 | US |