Information
-
Patent Grant
-
6302210
-
Patent Number
6,302,210
-
Date Filed
Monday, November 10, 199727 years ago
-
Date Issued
Tuesday, October 16, 200123 years ago
-
Inventors
-
Original Assignees
-
Examiners
- Bagnell; David
- Singh; Sunil
Agents
- Imwalle; William M.
- Carstens; David W.
-
CPC
-
US Classifications
Field of Search
US
- 166 319
- 166 321
- 166 374
- 166 324
- 166 386
- 251 58
- 251 281
- 251 282
-
International Classifications
-
Abstract
A subsurface safety valve has a tubular valve housing, a valve closure member movable between an open and a closed position, an axially shiftable flow tube for opening the valve closure member. Hydraulic pressure from the control line is used to move a piston, which in turn moves an axially shiftable opening prong through the closure member. A balance line, or second hydraulic line is also used to make the valve well insensitive. An isolation valve is placed in the flow path of the second hydraulic line. The isolation valve prevents gas migration into the balance line. It also provides volume control for the fluid displaced when the piston is moved by pressure from the control line. Further, the valve can be closed by the application of sufficient pressure through the second hydraulic line.
Description
TECHNICAL FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates a subsurface safety valve and, more particularly, to a subsurface safety valve having a tubular housing and an axially shiftable flow tube used to manipulate a valve closure member.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Subsurface safety valves (SSSVs) are used within well bores to prevent the uncontrolled escape of well bore fluids, which if not controlled could directly lead to a catastrophic well blowout. Certain styles of safety valves are called flapper type valves because the valve closure member is in the form of a circular disc or in the form of a curved disc. These flappers can be opened by the application of hydraulic pressure to a piston and cylinder assembly to move an opening prong against the flapper. The opening prong is biased by a helical spring in a direction to allow the flapper to close in the event that hydraulic fluid pressure is reduced or lost.
FIGS. 1 and 2
illustrate a standard safety valve configuration
10
wherein a safety valve
14
is interposed in a tubing string
12
. A control line
16
is used to open the valve. The valve
14
includes a tubular valve housing
18
with an axial passage
20
. When hydraulic pressure is applied through port
22
, the pressure forces a piston
24
to engage an axially shiftable opening prong
30
. As the pressure forces the piston downward, the opening prong engages the closure member
32
and pushes the member into an open position. A spring
28
opposes the motion of the piston so that when the hydraulic pressure is released, the piston and opening prong are returned to a first position. The weight of the hydraulic fluid produces a “head” force against the piston, and thus is a factor in sizing the spring
28
. In general, the pressure required to close the valve
14
is given by:
Pressure
closing
=Force
spring
/Area
piston
Setting subsurface safety valves deeper is typically just a matter of ensuring sufficient closing pressure to offset the hydrostatic pressure acting to cause the valve to stay open. Increasing closing pressure is accomplished by increasing the Force
spring
or decreasing Area
piston
terms.
As the valve closing pressure increases, so does the valve opening pressure. The surface capacity to provide operating pressure is a combination of the pressure needed to open the valve and the internal well pressure:
Pressure
surface
=Pressure
opening
+Pressure
well
However, the available surface operating pressure can be limited by the umbilical line used to deliver the hydraulic pressure. It is not uncommon for that limit to be approximately 10,000 psi. Thus, if the surface pressure is fixed and the well pressure increases with depth, the opening pressure decreases with depth.
For this reason, designs which operate independent of well pressure are required. Two well known designs are the dome charges safety valves and balance lines safety valves. A balance line valve
40
having a piston
48
in a housing
42
is illustrated in FIG.
3
. Two hydraulic chambers are pressurized on opposite sides of the piston
48
. A control line is coupled to a first port
44
while the balance line is coupled to a second port
46
. Each hydraulic line is filled with the same type of fluid. Hydrostatic pressure from the well above and below the piston is equal. Thus, there is no downward force on the spring as a result of the hydrostatic pressure. The valve is operated by pressurizing the upper chamber
55
using the control line connected to the first port
44
. This increases the downward force F
1
, displacing fluid from the lower chamber
51
and compressing the spring
50
to open the valve. Well pressure only has access to the upper seal
54
.
Well pressure acts upwards on seal
52
and downwards on seal
54
. Therefore, the radius
49
of the upper end of the piston
48
is equal to the radius
53
of the lower end, and pressure has no upward or downward resulting force on the piston as long as the seals
52
,
54
remain intact. Control line pressure acts downward on surface area
56
while balance line pressure acts upward on surface area
58
. Thus, the hydrostatic pressures on opposite sides of the piston
48
are equalized. If seal
52
fails, well pressure enters the balance pressure chamber
57
, acting on surface area
58
, and increasing F
3
. If the well pressure is great, it may be impossible to supply sufficient surface pressure to port
44
to force the opening prong downward. Thus, the safety valve fails to a closed position. If seal
54
fails, well pressure would enter the control chamber
55
and act on surface area
56
increasing F
1
. Without applying control line pressure, the F
1
would be greater than F
2
+F
3
. This imbalance causes the valve to fail in an open position. The valve can be closed by pressuring up the balance line port
46
so that F
3
+F
2
is greater that the well assisted F
1
. This is only possible if sufficient balance line pressure can be applied. Another failure mode occurs when gas in the well fluid migrates into the balance line, reducing the hydrostatic pressure applied by the balance line, i.e. reducing F
3
.
Another style of balance line safety valve is illustrated in FIG.
4
. The valve
60
has a piston
64
captured within a housing
62
and three hydraulic chambers
68
,
70
, and
72
, two above and one below the valve piston. Two hydraulic lines are run to the surface. Well pressure acts on seals
74
,
80
. Since the radius
63
of the upper end and the radius
68
of the lower end of the piston are the same, well pressure has no influence on the pressure required to displace the piston. One of the two hydraulic lines is a control line and is connected to port
77
. The other hydraulic line is a balance line and is connected to the upper port
75
and the lower port
79
. Control line and balance line hydrostatic pressures act on identical piston surface areas
65
,
67
B-A′ and B-A″, so there is no net upward or downward force. If seal
74
leaks, well pressure accesses the balance line system. This pressure acts on surface area
67
, boosting force F
3
, which with spring force F
2
will overcome F
1
, to close the valve. If seal
76
leaks, communication between the control and balance lines will be established. F
1
will always equal F
3
. Thus, F
2
will be the only active force causing the valve to close. If seal
78
leaks, it has the same effect as seal
76
leaking. If seal
80
leaks, tubing pressure accesses the balance line system. This pressure acts to increase F
3
, overcoming F
1
and closing the valve. Thus, if sufficient control line pressure is available and tubing pressure is relatively low, it may be possible to open the valve if upper seal
74
and/or lower seal
80
leak. Control line force F
1
must be greater than the tubing assisted balance force F
3
plus the spring force F
2
. In all modes of failure for this valve, the valve fails to a closed position.
A dome charge safety valve uses a captured gas charge. The gas charge provides a heavy spring force to achieve an increased closing pressure. However, dome charge designs are complex and require specialized manufacturing and personnel. This increases the cost and decreases the reliability of the design because numerous seals are required. Also, industry standards favor metal-to-metal (MTM) sealing systems. Gas charges require the use of elastomeric seals.
A need exists for a safety valve suitable for subsea applications and which is well pressure insensitive. Thus, it should incorporate the benefits of a balance line SSSV while overcoming the difficulties associated with gas migration into the balance line. Such a valve should also utilize MTM sealing systems for increased reliability. Finally, the improved valve should allow for the application of hydraulic pressure to close the valve in the event of a valve failure in an open position.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates to an improved safety valve that can be used in deep set applications by utilizing a simple pressure isolated chamber in combination with an isolation valve. The isolation could be part of the valve or a separate item. The isolation valve addresses the concerns typically associated with balance line concepts while also eliminating the need to contain a gas charge with elastomeric seals.
The isolation valve
108
is a key element of the solution. The isolation valve provides for volume exchange within the pressure isolated chamber
108
a
during opening and closing. This further ensures that the necessary volume is provided even if some fluid exchange occurs between the first set of well isolation seals. The isolation valve
108
also provides for pressure shut-off
109
of the secondary line, while also preventing gas migration into the secondary line. It further provides for transfer of pressure from secondary line for closing valve for remedial cycling of the safety valve.
The isolation valve also allows for the use of conventional SSSV technology whereas seal failure of the pressure isolation chamber does not impact the valve reliability after well pressure depletes. It is a lower cost solution with higher reliability. In combination with the secondary pressure line, the isolation seal differential is minimized by applying secondary line pressure. Finally, this design solution provides for common equipment between conventional completions and subsea completions.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
For a more complete understanding of the present invention, and for further details and advantages thereof, reference is now made to the following Detailed Description taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, in which:
FIGS. 1 and 2
schematically illustrate a prior art safety valve having a single control line;
FIG. 3
illustrates a prior art balance line safety valve having a balance line;
FIG. 4
illustrates an improved prior art balance line safety valve;
FIG. 5
illustrates an embodiment of the present invention safety valve utilizing an isolation valve on the second control line; and
FIGS. 6
a
and
6
b
are sectional views across the length of the present safety valve.
FIG. 6
c
is a schematic illustration of the isolation valve.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
A safety valve
100
embodying the present invention is illustrated in
FIGS. 5
,
6
a
, and
6
b
. The valve
100
is placed in the flow path of tubing
102
. A control line
104
is coupled to a first input port
122
. When hydraulic pressure is applied through port
122
, the pressure forces a piston
124
to engage an axially shiftable opening prong
130
. As the pressure forces the piston
124
downward, the opening prong engages the closure member
132
and pushes the member into an open position. A spring
128
opposes the motion of the piston
124
so that when the hydraulic pressure is released, the piston
124
and opening prong
130
are returned to a closed position
132
a
. The closure member is biased to a closed position by a torsional spring
134
.
The weight of the hydraulic fluid produces a “head” force against the piston. A second hydraulic line
106
can be coupled to a second port
112
which allows it to supply hydraulic pressure to an annular chamber
114
. The pressure in the annular chamber
114
can be used to counteract the hydraulic head from the control line
104
, thereby making it easier for the spring
128
to lift the opening prong
130
to close the valve. Further, if the piston
124
or the opening prong
130
were to mechanically jam due to debris or otherwise, a lifting force could be applied through the second line
106
.
The isolation valve
108
contains a variable volume chamber
108
a
. When the piston
124
is displaced downward by pressure applied through the control line
104
, a volume of fluid beneath the piston
124
, in annular chamber
114
, is necessarily displaced. The displaced volume can flow back into the second line
106
and into the isolation chamber
108
a
which expands to accommodate the displaced volume. The isolation chamber
108
a
can be a housing with a movable piston
105
for one wall. As displaced fluid enters the isolation chamber
108
a
, the piston
105
wall will move in response.
In the embodiment discussed above, a second hydraulic line is coupled, through
106
an isolation valve
108
to second port
112
. In an alternative embodiment, the second hydraulic line
106
is open at
110
to the well annulus. By pressurizing the annulus, the same functionality is achieved as with a second hydraulic line. In an alternate embodiment, the second hydraulic line is closed at
110
. In this case, while additional closing pressure cannot be applied, the isolation valve
108
will allow for volume control of the fluid displaced by the piston
124
when pressure is applied through the control line
104
.
Although preferred embodiments of the present invention have been described in the foregoing Detailed Description and illustrated in the accompanying drawings, it will be understood that the invention is not limited to the embodiments disclosed, but is capable of numerous rearrangements, modifications, and substitutions of steps without departing from the spirit of the invention. Accordingly, the present invention is intended to encompass such rearrangements, modifications, and substitutions of steps as fall within the scope of the appended claims.
Claims
- 1. A safety valve for use in a well bore having an annulus, said valve comprising:(a) a tubular valve housing; (b) a valve closure member captured in said housing and movable between an open and a closed position; (c) an axially shiftable opening prong captured in said housing for opening the valve closure member; (d) a control line for supplying a hydraulic pressure to move the opening prong against the closure member; (e) a balance line coupled to said tubular housing; and (f) an isolation valve coupled to said balance line wherein the isolation valve isolates said balance line from a g as migration from said safety valve.
- 2. The safety valve of claim 1 further comprises a piston downwardly responsive to said hydraulic pressure from said control line, wherein said piston is displacable into an annular chamber, and wherein said piston is coupled to the opening prong.
- 3. The safety valve of claim 2, wherein said annular chamber is in fluid communication with said isolation valve.
- 4. The safety valve of claim 1 further comprises a piston upwardly responsive to a hydraulic pressure from said balance line.
- 5. The safety valve of claim 1 wherein said balance line is coupled to a surface pressure source.
- 6. The safety valve of claim 1 wherein said balance line is coupled to the annulus.
- 7. The safety valve of claim 6 wherein said annulus is pressurized.
- 8. A method of operating a safety valve placed in the flow path of a string of well tubing within a well annulus, said safety valve having a control line supplying a first hydraulic pressure to an axially shiftable opening prong, said method comprising the steps of:(a) supplying a second source of hydraulic pressure through a balance line to an annular chamber within said safety valve; and (b) isolating said balance line from a gas migration from said safety valve with an isolation valve comprised of an expandable volume chamber capable of receiving fluid displaced from within said safety valve.
- 9. The method of claim 8 further comprises:(c) applying a closing pressure to said safety valve through said balance line.
- 10. The method of claim 9 wherein said balance line pressure exceeds said control line pressure.
- 11. The method of claim 8, wherein step (a) further comprises coupling said balance line to a surface pressure source.
- 12. The method of claim 8 wherein step (a) further comprises coupling said balance line to said well annulus.
- 13. A safety valve for use in a well bore, said valve comprising:(a) a tubular valve housing; (b) a valve closure member captured in said housing and movable between an open and a closed position; (c) an axially shiftable opening prong captured in said housing for opening the valve closure member; (d) a control line for supplying a hydraulic pressure to move the opening prong against the closure member; (e) a balance line coupled to said tubular housing wherein said balance line is coupled to an annulus, and (f) an isolation valve coupled to said balance line.
- 14. The safety valve of claim 13 wherein said isolation valve comprises a variable volume chamber.
- 15. The safety valve of claim 13 further comprises a piston downwardly responsive to said hydraulic pressure from said control line, wherein said piston is displacable into an annular chamber, and wherein said piston is coupled to the opening prong.
- 16. The safety valve of claim 15 wherein said annular chamber is in fluid communication with said isolation valve.
- 17. The safety valve of claim 13 further comprises a piston upwardly responsive to a hydraulic pressure from said balance line.
- 18. The safety valve of claim 13 wherein said isolation valve isolates the balance line from a migration of gas into the balance line.
US Referenced Citations (12)
Foreign Referenced Citations (1)
Number |
Date |
Country |
2 167 791 A |
Jun 1986 |
GB |