Safety valve utilizing an isolation valve and method of using the same

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6302210
  • Patent Number
    6,302,210
  • Date Filed
    Monday, November 10, 1997
    27 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, October 16, 2001
    23 years ago
Abstract
A subsurface safety valve has a tubular valve housing, a valve closure member movable between an open and a closed position, an axially shiftable flow tube for opening the valve closure member. Hydraulic pressure from the control line is used to move a piston, which in turn moves an axially shiftable opening prong through the closure member. A balance line, or second hydraulic line is also used to make the valve well insensitive. An isolation valve is placed in the flow path of the second hydraulic line. The isolation valve prevents gas migration into the balance line. It also provides volume control for the fluid displaced when the piston is moved by pressure from the control line. Further, the valve can be closed by the application of sufficient pressure through the second hydraulic line.
Description




TECHNICAL FIELD OF THE INVENTION




The present invention relates a subsurface safety valve and, more particularly, to a subsurface safety valve having a tubular housing and an axially shiftable flow tube used to manipulate a valve closure member.




BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION




Subsurface safety valves (SSSVs) are used within well bores to prevent the uncontrolled escape of well bore fluids, which if not controlled could directly lead to a catastrophic well blowout. Certain styles of safety valves are called flapper type valves because the valve closure member is in the form of a circular disc or in the form of a curved disc. These flappers can be opened by the application of hydraulic pressure to a piston and cylinder assembly to move an opening prong against the flapper. The opening prong is biased by a helical spring in a direction to allow the flapper to close in the event that hydraulic fluid pressure is reduced or lost.





FIGS. 1 and 2

illustrate a standard safety valve configuration


10


wherein a safety valve


14


is interposed in a tubing string


12


. A control line


16


is used to open the valve. The valve


14


includes a tubular valve housing


18


with an axial passage


20


. When hydraulic pressure is applied through port


22


, the pressure forces a piston


24


to engage an axially shiftable opening prong


30


. As the pressure forces the piston downward, the opening prong engages the closure member


32


and pushes the member into an open position. A spring


28


opposes the motion of the piston so that when the hydraulic pressure is released, the piston and opening prong are returned to a first position. The weight of the hydraulic fluid produces a “head” force against the piston, and thus is a factor in sizing the spring


28


. In general, the pressure required to close the valve


14


is given by:






Pressure


closing


=Force


spring


/Area


piston








Setting subsurface safety valves deeper is typically just a matter of ensuring sufficient closing pressure to offset the hydrostatic pressure acting to cause the valve to stay open. Increasing closing pressure is accomplished by increasing the Force


spring


or decreasing Area


piston


terms.




As the valve closing pressure increases, so does the valve opening pressure. The surface capacity to provide operating pressure is a combination of the pressure needed to open the valve and the internal well pressure:






Pressure


surface


=Pressure


opening


+Pressure


well








However, the available surface operating pressure can be limited by the umbilical line used to deliver the hydraulic pressure. It is not uncommon for that limit to be approximately 10,000 psi. Thus, if the surface pressure is fixed and the well pressure increases with depth, the opening pressure decreases with depth.




For this reason, designs which operate independent of well pressure are required. Two well known designs are the dome charges safety valves and balance lines safety valves. A balance line valve


40


having a piston


48


in a housing


42


is illustrated in FIG.


3


. Two hydraulic chambers are pressurized on opposite sides of the piston


48


. A control line is coupled to a first port


44


while the balance line is coupled to a second port


46


. Each hydraulic line is filled with the same type of fluid. Hydrostatic pressure from the well above and below the piston is equal. Thus, there is no downward force on the spring as a result of the hydrostatic pressure. The valve is operated by pressurizing the upper chamber


55


using the control line connected to the first port


44


. This increases the downward force F


1


, displacing fluid from the lower chamber


51


and compressing the spring


50


to open the valve. Well pressure only has access to the upper seal


54


.




Well pressure acts upwards on seal


52


and downwards on seal


54


. Therefore, the radius


49


of the upper end of the piston


48


is equal to the radius


53


of the lower end, and pressure has no upward or downward resulting force on the piston as long as the seals


52


,


54


remain intact. Control line pressure acts downward on surface area


56


while balance line pressure acts upward on surface area


58


. Thus, the hydrostatic pressures on opposite sides of the piston


48


are equalized. If seal


52


fails, well pressure enters the balance pressure chamber


57


, acting on surface area


58


, and increasing F


3


. If the well pressure is great, it may be impossible to supply sufficient surface pressure to port


44


to force the opening prong downward. Thus, the safety valve fails to a closed position. If seal


54


fails, well pressure would enter the control chamber


55


and act on surface area


56


increasing F


1


. Without applying control line pressure, the F


1


would be greater than F


2


+F


3


. This imbalance causes the valve to fail in an open position. The valve can be closed by pressuring up the balance line port


46


so that F


3


+F


2


is greater that the well assisted F


1


. This is only possible if sufficient balance line pressure can be applied. Another failure mode occurs when gas in the well fluid migrates into the balance line, reducing the hydrostatic pressure applied by the balance line, i.e. reducing F


3


.




Another style of balance line safety valve is illustrated in FIG.


4


. The valve


60


has a piston


64


captured within a housing


62


and three hydraulic chambers


68


,


70


, and


72


, two above and one below the valve piston. Two hydraulic lines are run to the surface. Well pressure acts on seals


74


,


80


. Since the radius


63


of the upper end and the radius


68


of the lower end of the piston are the same, well pressure has no influence on the pressure required to displace the piston. One of the two hydraulic lines is a control line and is connected to port


77


. The other hydraulic line is a balance line and is connected to the upper port


75


and the lower port


79


. Control line and balance line hydrostatic pressures act on identical piston surface areas


65


,


67


B-A′ and B-A″, so there is no net upward or downward force. If seal


74


leaks, well pressure accesses the balance line system. This pressure acts on surface area


67


, boosting force F


3


, which with spring force F


2


will overcome F


1


, to close the valve. If seal


76


leaks, communication between the control and balance lines will be established. F


1


will always equal F


3


. Thus, F


2


will be the only active force causing the valve to close. If seal


78


leaks, it has the same effect as seal


76


leaking. If seal


80


leaks, tubing pressure accesses the balance line system. This pressure acts to increase F


3


, overcoming F


1


and closing the valve. Thus, if sufficient control line pressure is available and tubing pressure is relatively low, it may be possible to open the valve if upper seal


74


and/or lower seal


80


leak. Control line force F


1


must be greater than the tubing assisted balance force F


3


plus the spring force F


2


. In all modes of failure for this valve, the valve fails to a closed position.




A dome charge safety valve uses a captured gas charge. The gas charge provides a heavy spring force to achieve an increased closing pressure. However, dome charge designs are complex and require specialized manufacturing and personnel. This increases the cost and decreases the reliability of the design because numerous seals are required. Also, industry standards favor metal-to-metal (MTM) sealing systems. Gas charges require the use of elastomeric seals.




A need exists for a safety valve suitable for subsea applications and which is well pressure insensitive. Thus, it should incorporate the benefits of a balance line SSSV while overcoming the difficulties associated with gas migration into the balance line. Such a valve should also utilize MTM sealing systems for increased reliability. Finally, the improved valve should allow for the application of hydraulic pressure to close the valve in the event of a valve failure in an open position.




SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION




The present invention relates to an improved safety valve that can be used in deep set applications by utilizing a simple pressure isolated chamber in combination with an isolation valve. The isolation could be part of the valve or a separate item. The isolation valve addresses the concerns typically associated with balance line concepts while also eliminating the need to contain a gas charge with elastomeric seals.




The isolation valve


108


is a key element of the solution. The isolation valve provides for volume exchange within the pressure isolated chamber


108




a


during opening and closing. This further ensures that the necessary volume is provided even if some fluid exchange occurs between the first set of well isolation seals. The isolation valve


108


also provides for pressure shut-off


109


of the secondary line, while also preventing gas migration into the secondary line. It further provides for transfer of pressure from secondary line for closing valve for remedial cycling of the safety valve.




The isolation valve also allows for the use of conventional SSSV technology whereas seal failure of the pressure isolation chamber does not impact the valve reliability after well pressure depletes. It is a lower cost solution with higher reliability. In combination with the secondary pressure line, the isolation seal differential is minimized by applying secondary line pressure. Finally, this design solution provides for common equipment between conventional completions and subsea completions.











BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS




For a more complete understanding of the present invention, and for further details and advantages thereof, reference is now made to the following Detailed Description taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, in which:





FIGS. 1 and 2

schematically illustrate a prior art safety valve having a single control line;





FIG. 3

illustrates a prior art balance line safety valve having a balance line;





FIG. 4

illustrates an improved prior art balance line safety valve;





FIG. 5

illustrates an embodiment of the present invention safety valve utilizing an isolation valve on the second control line; and





FIGS. 6



a


and


6




b


are sectional views across the length of the present safety valve.





FIG. 6



c


is a schematic illustration of the isolation valve.











DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS




A safety valve


100


embodying the present invention is illustrated in

FIGS. 5

,


6




a


, and


6




b


. The valve


100


is placed in the flow path of tubing


102


. A control line


104


is coupled to a first input port


122


. When hydraulic pressure is applied through port


122


, the pressure forces a piston


124


to engage an axially shiftable opening prong


130


. As the pressure forces the piston


124


downward, the opening prong engages the closure member


132


and pushes the member into an open position. A spring


128


opposes the motion of the piston


124


so that when the hydraulic pressure is released, the piston


124


and opening prong


130


are returned to a closed position


132




a


. The closure member is biased to a closed position by a torsional spring


134


.




The weight of the hydraulic fluid produces a “head” force against the piston. A second hydraulic line


106


can be coupled to a second port


112


which allows it to supply hydraulic pressure to an annular chamber


114


. The pressure in the annular chamber


114


can be used to counteract the hydraulic head from the control line


104


, thereby making it easier for the spring


128


to lift the opening prong


130


to close the valve. Further, if the piston


124


or the opening prong


130


were to mechanically jam due to debris or otherwise, a lifting force could be applied through the second line


106


.




The isolation valve


108


contains a variable volume chamber


108




a


. When the piston


124


is displaced downward by pressure applied through the control line


104


, a volume of fluid beneath the piston


124


, in annular chamber


114


, is necessarily displaced. The displaced volume can flow back into the second line


106


and into the isolation chamber


108




a


which expands to accommodate the displaced volume. The isolation chamber


108




a


can be a housing with a movable piston


105


for one wall. As displaced fluid enters the isolation chamber


108




a


, the piston


105


wall will move in response.




In the embodiment discussed above, a second hydraulic line is coupled, through


106


an isolation valve


108


to second port


112


. In an alternative embodiment, the second hydraulic line


106


is open at


110


to the well annulus. By pressurizing the annulus, the same functionality is achieved as with a second hydraulic line. In an alternate embodiment, the second hydraulic line is closed at


110


. In this case, while additional closing pressure cannot be applied, the isolation valve


108


will allow for volume control of the fluid displaced by the piston


124


when pressure is applied through the control line


104


.




Although preferred embodiments of the present invention have been described in the foregoing Detailed Description and illustrated in the accompanying drawings, it will be understood that the invention is not limited to the embodiments disclosed, but is capable of numerous rearrangements, modifications, and substitutions of steps without departing from the spirit of the invention. Accordingly, the present invention is intended to encompass such rearrangements, modifications, and substitutions of steps as fall within the scope of the appended claims.



Claims
  • 1. A safety valve for use in a well bore having an annulus, said valve comprising:(a) a tubular valve housing; (b) a valve closure member captured in said housing and movable between an open and a closed position; (c) an axially shiftable opening prong captured in said housing for opening the valve closure member; (d) a control line for supplying a hydraulic pressure to move the opening prong against the closure member; (e) a balance line coupled to said tubular housing; and (f) an isolation valve coupled to said balance line wherein the isolation valve isolates said balance line from a g as migration from said safety valve.
  • 2. The safety valve of claim 1 further comprises a piston downwardly responsive to said hydraulic pressure from said control line, wherein said piston is displacable into an annular chamber, and wherein said piston is coupled to the opening prong.
  • 3. The safety valve of claim 2, wherein said annular chamber is in fluid communication with said isolation valve.
  • 4. The safety valve of claim 1 further comprises a piston upwardly responsive to a hydraulic pressure from said balance line.
  • 5. The safety valve of claim 1 wherein said balance line is coupled to a surface pressure source.
  • 6. The safety valve of claim 1 wherein said balance line is coupled to the annulus.
  • 7. The safety valve of claim 6 wherein said annulus is pressurized.
  • 8. A method of operating a safety valve placed in the flow path of a string of well tubing within a well annulus, said safety valve having a control line supplying a first hydraulic pressure to an axially shiftable opening prong, said method comprising the steps of:(a) supplying a second source of hydraulic pressure through a balance line to an annular chamber within said safety valve; and (b) isolating said balance line from a gas migration from said safety valve with an isolation valve comprised of an expandable volume chamber capable of receiving fluid displaced from within said safety valve.
  • 9. The method of claim 8 further comprises:(c) applying a closing pressure to said safety valve through said balance line.
  • 10. The method of claim 9 wherein said balance line pressure exceeds said control line pressure.
  • 11. The method of claim 8, wherein step (a) further comprises coupling said balance line to a surface pressure source.
  • 12. The method of claim 8 wherein step (a) further comprises coupling said balance line to said well annulus.
  • 13. A safety valve for use in a well bore, said valve comprising:(a) a tubular valve housing; (b) a valve closure member captured in said housing and movable between an open and a closed position; (c) an axially shiftable opening prong captured in said housing for opening the valve closure member; (d) a control line for supplying a hydraulic pressure to move the opening prong against the closure member; (e) a balance line coupled to said tubular housing wherein said balance line is coupled to an annulus, and (f) an isolation valve coupled to said balance line.
  • 14. The safety valve of claim 13 wherein said isolation valve comprises a variable volume chamber.
  • 15. The safety valve of claim 13 further comprises a piston downwardly responsive to said hydraulic pressure from said control line, wherein said piston is displacable into an annular chamber, and wherein said piston is coupled to the opening prong.
  • 16. The safety valve of claim 15 wherein said annular chamber is in fluid communication with said isolation valve.
  • 17. The safety valve of claim 13 further comprises a piston upwardly responsive to a hydraulic pressure from said balance line.
  • 18. The safety valve of claim 13 wherein said isolation valve isolates the balance line from a migration of gas into the balance line.
US Referenced Citations (12)
Number Name Date Kind
3696868 Taylor, Jr. Oct 1972
3782461 Watkins Jan 1974
4149698 Deaton Apr 1979
4252197 Pringle Feb 1981
4444266 Pringle Apr 1984
4495998 Pringle Jan 1985
4513944 Adams, Jr. Apr 1985
4598773 Pringle Jul 1986
4621695 Pringle Nov 1986
4676307 Pringle Jun 1987
5906220 Thompson May 1999
6003605 Dickson et al. Dec 1999
Foreign Referenced Citations (1)
Number Date Country
2 167 791 A Jun 1986 GB