The present invention relates to a highly maneuverable craft with aerostatic lift, that is, a craft which derives lift from a gas lighter than the mixed atmospheric gases surrounding said craft and herein to be referred to as an aerostat or or airship or dirigible, all meaning to be one and the same.
More particularly, the invention concerns an airship that operates with low noise levels, minimal ecological impact either direct or incident due to a reduced or almost nil exhaust emissions leaving close to a zero carbon footprint while operating, excellent mooring and surface handling characteristics, and it is an amphibious dirigible able to land either on water or land.
Many of the design characteristics, more specifically of propulsion, maneuvering and ground handling of aerostats or dirigibles currently in use have not changed much greatly since the first manned flight of a hydrogen balloon took place on Dec. 1, 1783. Structurally, then as now, a non-rigid envelope of certain flexible material is filled with a gas such as helium or hydrogen or any number of lighter-than-air gas in order to offset all, or substantially all of the weight of the air vehicle, including its own mass, cargo, crew and passengers.
In reference to the propulsion aspect, even when the first manned balloon lifted up to the sky, it became soon apparent for the dire need to direct its flight. Some tried to flap attached bird-like wings and similar contraptions while yet other pioneer aeronauts, like Jean-Pierre Francois Blanchard, tried to use huge oars as when he attempted for the first time to cross the English Channel by air. Then in 1852 a special steam-engine driving a propeller was developed by Henri Giffard and mounted below a 144-foot long elongated balloon. Eventhough its paltry top speed of six miles per hour was not enough to fight against the light breeze that was blowing Giffard nonetheless was able to steer the ship in large circles, the event by itself signalling the first true demonstration of man's first powered flight.
The steam engine soon gave way to the internal combustion engine which was used for the first time aboard an airship in 1871. The fuel for the engine was coal gas, the same that burned in Paris' streetlights, and was drawn directly from the gasbag. It was not long before the internal combustion engine industry followed through on more requirements from later brave, intrepid aeronauts for more powerful engines to carry aboard the airships. Representative of this marriage of late 19th century industrial engineering and ballooning, a twelve horsepower diesel-fed Daimler-Benz internal combustion engine helped propel an airship constructed by Alberto Santos-Dumont and won him the Deutch Prize in Jul. 13, 1901.
Around the time Santos-Dumont was experimenting with his one-man airships in France, at another part of the European mainland in Germany, Count Ferdinand von Zeppelin was already designing and constructing on what was to be the basis of future rigid airship designs. The propulsion means of his first airship, the LZ-1, which first took off in Jul. 2, 1900 from Lake Constance near Friedrichshafen, Germany was provided with two fifteen-hp internal-combustion engines from the same Daimler-Benz company. But it was the British who eventually made the first trans-Atlantic crossing by an airship in Jul. 2, 1919; 108 hours for the east-to-west leg and only 75 hours on the return trip. The airplane would not duplicate this feat until years later in 1928. The R.34, its design reversed engineered from a captured German naval Zeppelin that crashlanded on English soil, was mounted with five gasoline-fed powerplants manufactured by an English company, each engine providing 275 hp. Similar gasoline-fed internal combustion engines providing a total thrust of 2,150 horsepower at normal cruising speed eventually allowed the German airship “Graf Zeppelin” in Oct. 11, 1928 to makes its own successful trans-Atlantic flight, its first of many crossings as it continued to operate commercially from 1928 to 1937; that is, until the Hindenburg fiery crash. The Graf was actually on its way home from Rio de Janeiro in Brazil when the crew received word by radio about the incident. Upon its landing in Germany, the airship was grounded until the cause of the crash was determined. No Zeppelin thereafter ever made another commercial flight.
It is a commonly held belief that the fiery crash of the Hindenburg in 1937 signaled the end of the airship's useful application. In fact, more dirigibles using this time helium for lift but still using internal-combustion engines for propulsion were in the air by the end of the Second World War than at any time in its history serving on surveillance sorties and convoy escort duties. After the war, the U.S. military continued on with its own airship programs under the K-ship program until the last flight by airship K-43 on Mar. 19, 1959.
Since that time however the prior Art has had only limited or almost non-existent practical applications in the world at large and as such has not caused due need to provide funding towards new research and development in the Art. As a representative of the state of the prior Art, the Goodyear blimps, all four remaining sister ships that are still operating, are still of the same design circa 1901 but have gamely gone on trying to become useful even if that use has just been for all intents and purposes as a flying billboard.
But that era may soon be closing and a new one may be heralding itself in. As in the case with the German zeppelins of the previous century, the modern military is again taking a renewed interest in the aerostat. At the forefront of this potential reawakening, is the recent purchase by the United States Army of a fleet of airships called the Airlander, co-manufactured by Britain's Hybrid Air Vehicles and the American defence contractor Northrop Grumman and intended for long-range surveillance missions, both manned and unmanned.
Beyond the military, clearly in deference to the issue of climate change, the Airlander is being marketed as a “green” transport solution, ostensibly using far less fuel than conventional aircraft as it is claimed by the company. For example, the unmanned surveillance version of the Airlander is claimed to be designed at being able to remain aloft for 21 weeks on about 18,000 pounds of fuel, far less in comparison to other airborne surveillance platforms. Still, this so-called advance in the prior Art is still using fossil fuels and therefore still has a definite, large carbon footprint and once assigned to fill various commercial applications, would still expand wider that footprint. Even if an airship's on-board propulsion where to switch to natural gas, nowadays considered as a cheaper alternative to diesel or gasoline, its primary extraction process called fracting has been meet with extreme controversy due to its hugely direct environmental impact and inherent dangers. A design proposal to use hydrogen as fuel in the future of the prior Art would carry with it the same inherent weakness as to why the hydrogen economy has not taken off as promised: it's still prohibitively expensive to extract hydrogen fuel intended for wide-scale usage, both militarily and commercially.
Certainly, the Airlander was just one of many proposed by several top competitors, including Lockheed Martin's P-971 which took second place, when the US Army was looking for new surveillance craft but as representatives of the current practice of the Art, none of these show any advancement in methodologies of propulsion and manuevering means nor in airship mooring and handling.
For the mooring and handling aspects, the current Art practices a type of air cushion landing system which deploys an inflatable cushion to soften landings and provide a suction effect to hold the craft still during loading and unloading. What this means, however, is that the suction mechanism must be operated at all times which in turn calls for further consumption of fossil fuels. And when dealing with the kind of tonnage that an airship can weigh, it would require powerful suction devices and a flat surface under the airship to keep it stable and secured. Another practice of the prior Art to try to resolve the handling issue is by installing an air cushion landing skirt underneath the envelope similar to those employed in hovercrafts that would have allowed it to move and park on its own. But these solutions both suffer from instability issues simply because on the ground as in the air the aerostat may weigh close to nothing but its tonnage would impart with it high momentum once it is subjected to sudden and strong gusts of wind, like any balloon.
Hence, the current practice of the prior ART to use brute force and physical labor to keep an airship close to the ground while attempting to load or unload passengers and cargo therefore reflects no improvements at all towards better mooring techniques since the Art's beginnings in early years of the previous century.
Thus, it is clear that there is a great need in the art for an improved method and system for a clean environment-friendly propulsion and maneuvering means, and for mooring and handling, while avoiding the shortcomings and drawbacks of the prior art apparatus and methodologies heretofore known.
The present invention includes many aspects and features. Moreover, while many aspects and features relate to lighter-than-air craft, and are described herein in the context of such devices having aerostatic lift capabilities which utilizes hydrogen or helium or other lighter-than-air gas contained in an envelope to offset or substantially offset the weight of the vehicle and load, the present invention is not just limited to providing a cost-effective, low maintenance, environment-friendly and an almost-nil climate-impact airship operation.
For example, the present invention can be applied to either a manned, unmanned or autonomous aerostat craft that may be tethered to the ground such that it will have the freedom of movement as much as the craft is sailing at a certain altitude but albeit may be holding unto a circumscribed circular flying pattern or a zig-zag course in the sky. This example pertains to the aerostat being utilized either for ground surveillance, weather observations and power generation wherein it may become paramount to limit where and how high the lighter-than-air craft may travel. While untethered, the present invention may also allow a craft to be applied with autonomous control in performing the same surveillance missions, scientific observations not just on Earth but also off-Earth such as the study of the other planets like Mars and Jupiter while cruising within their respective atmospheres.
Accordingly, it is a primary object of the present invention to provide an improved system of propulsion and power generation for aerostats, that may be comparably very cost effective, very environment friendly and may provide zero or almost-nil exhaust emissions while operating. Harnessing the wind has always been an ancient engineering tradition trying to solve similarly age-old problems of proper water irrigation or food processing as in wheat grinding to create flour for bread. At one time, wind power was the only way to get around to and from the New World and when the routes were all well and plotted, it still took months of travel to cross the Atlantic and the other oceans. Nowadays, those twenty-five knot gusts which could sweep across the Pacific now gets the undivided attention of the kiteboarders one may see flinging into the sky as seen from the beaches in Tofino on Vancouver Island. On the land however sometimes the wind blows weakly and sometimes not at all but starting at an altitude of about 1300 feet, close to the height of the Eiffel Tower, the wind actually blows more consistently and usually at one and a half to three times faster that at the earth's surface. The present invention may then allow a craft to be appropriately so equipped with any rigid, substantially vertical airfoil-device or a flexible generally-shaped sail or similar device which may then be deployed at cruising altitude to catch the wind, navigate, manouever and in so doing may provide an environment-friendly, cost-effective method of moving an aerostat from place to place.
Further, it is an object of the present invention in that it may have onboard a device to harness the same wind to generate and further store generated electrical power further allowing said present invention to be independent of any land-based power grid with which to power any of its on-board electronic and electromechanical devices. It may even allow said invention to sell any excess power that may be stored on on-board batteries back to said power-grid.
Another object of the present invention is to provide an improved craft which does not rely on aerodynamics to achieve lift nor to stay aloft, and which possesses a greater ease of manoeuverability even while at close to zero speed or at station keeping, that may be due to the presence of thrusters on gimbals allowing much freedom of movement of said thrusters along three axes namely: lateral, the vertical and the horizontal; which may then also allow for the craft of the present invention to be able to rotate about a substantially vertical axis passing through a center of the air craft. In comparison, traditional and current lighter-than-air craft rely on continuous flow of air across an aerodynamic body and control surfaces to remain aloft and to manoeuver.
And yet another object of the present invention is to provide an improved craft which does not rely on traditional mooring facilities nor the brute physical assistance of extensive ground crews. This is because the present invention may provide the craft an amphibious capability in that it is able to either traditionally touchdown on land, or near the seashore, or on any land-locked body of water such as a lake. The present invention may allow a craft to also contain but is not limited to having hollow ballast compartments within the hull of said craft that may fill with water to serve as ballast, and thus negate the need for any ballast exchange. If once landed on any body of water, for example, the vehicle may be made to be propelled by marine means towards a standard docking facility or port built usually to service water-going ships. Further, such other conventional lighter-than-air vehicles are typically moored at the bow to have to be able to swivel a full 360 degrees in response to wind direction, and as such will need a very large landing pad. The take-off from a water dock of the craft such as described in all the embodiments of the present invention may only require said vehicle to purge the water out of the ballast tanks, raise vertically and navigate towards the desired direction.
This said aspect of the present invention may actually be of great benefit and serve as a safe, affordable, cost-effective, low-maintenance medium of transportation for foot traffic that does not suffer from infrequent trip schedules and thus may pave a new way to better connect the various island communities such as those that similarly may be found in the Gulf Islands and the Sunshine Coast located in the province of British Columbia, Canada. These and similar geographical areas have also been found to have mild weather almost the whole year through most especially the waters between Taxada Island and the mentioned Sunshine Coast. And beyond engendering a new form of sport and toy device, the present invention may even allow such craft to promote further the exploration and a noise-free eco-tourism showcasing the natural resources to be found on the coast or in the interior of a territory whereby automatically eliminating the need to have invasive infrastructure like roads, airstrips or bridges.
The novel features which are believed to be characteristic of the invention, both but not limited to its organization and method of operation, together with further objects and advantages thereof, will be better understood from the following description in connection with the accompanying drawings in which the presently preferred and other embodiments of the invention is illustrated by way of example. It is to be expressly understood, however, that the drawings are for purposes of illustration and description only and are not intended as a definition of the limits of the invention.
These and other aspects, features and advantages of this novel sail-equipped amphibious, highly manoeuvrable craft with aerostatic lift will be more easily understood upon consideration of the following detailed description, which refers to an illustrative and preferred but non-restrictive embodiments of the present invention, and from the attached drawings, in which:
As a preliminary matter, it will be readily understood by one having ordinary skill in the relevant art (“Ordinary Artisan”) that the present invention has broad utility and application. Further, for additional illustrative purposes other embodiments may also be discussed such as to provide a full and enabling disclosure of the present invention. In addition, many embodiments, such as adaptations, variations, modifications, and equivalent arrangements, will be implicitly disclosed by the embodiments described herein and fall within the scope of the present invention.
Accordingly, while the present invention is described herein in detail in relation to one or more embodiments, it is to be understood that this disclosure is illustrative and exemplary of the present invention, and is made merely for the purposes of providing a full and enabling disclosure of the present invention. The detailed disclosure herein of one or more of the embodiments of the present invention is not to be considered nor construed as providing limitations on the scope of patent protection afforded the said present invention, which scope is to be defined by the claims and the equivalents thereof. Likewise, any reading into any claim a limitation found herein that does not explicitly appear in the claim itself cannot be applied to limit the scope of patent protection afforded the present invention.
Thus, for example, any sequences and/or an apparent temporal order of steps of various methods and/or installations that are described herein are merely illustrative, and are not to be construed as limiting or there being a particular order or sequence that the steps or installations have to follow. Hence, any of the steps or methods of installation can be performed non-sequentially and still remain within the scope of the present invention. Accordingly, the intention is that the appended claims rather defines the scope of the patent protection afforded the present invention, and not the descriptions set forth herein.
Additionally, it is important to note that each term used herein refers to concepts and ideas that the Ordinary Artisan would understands to mean such terms to mean based on contextual use of such terms herein. To the extent that the meaning of a term used herein differs from any particular dictionary definition of such term, it is intended that the meaning of the term as understood by the Ordinary Artisan should prevail.
Referring now to the figures in the accompanying Drawings, the illustrative embodiments of the present invention will now be described in great technical detail, wherein like parts are indicated by like reference numbers.
According to one of the broader aspects of the present invention, the first embodiment of a novel sail-equipped aerostat that may include a multiple-hull structure generally referred to by numeral 10 with some amphibious capability and improved maneouverability is shown in various views in
The aerostat craft 10 shown in
Further, said envelopes may be adapted to contain an aerostatic gas, which, in the preferred embodiment, is helium, though it would be apparent to others skilled in the art that other gases could be utilized singly or in combination (hereinafter, when reference is made to aerostatic or buoyant gas, it is to be understood unless specified that reference is also being made to either hydrogen, helium or its other similar inert lighter-than-air gases up to but not limited to high-temperature gases as would be known to a person skilled in the art).
Still in reference to this first embodiment of the present invention shown in
Further shown in
In
Further, as seen in
Still in reference to mounting sails on a generally lighter-than-air amphibious and maneuverable craft,
However, proper operation of the sail may require that the sail assemblies to be preferably not in the same plane as the gas envelope or the hull. One aspect of the present invention allows the craft while in flight to sail against the wind in a technique called tacking, a practice used by water borne vessels. In sailing, usually the downward-acting force representing the weight of a regular water sailing craft is countered by the buoyancy force of the water with the upward resulting force acting from a point along where waterline meets the hull of the craft. The forces acting on the sail, the sailboat's keel and its ballast is samely applied at that same point and it is the resultant vectors of those forces that allows the sailboat to move forward even against the flow of the wind. However, for an aerostat, the source providing the the buoyant force or effect is located above the fuselage or gondola and thus the need to relocate the sail to the plane beneath the centerline of the aerostat, opposite from the buoyant force.
Means are thus provided to move the sail pod assembly 40 as seen in
As seen in
As seen now in
Thus, wind currents flowing across the outrigger deck are to impact the vanes 52 causing the paddlewheel assembly to rotate driving the high-speed rotor shaft and a gear box assembly 57 comprises a plurality of differentials that may controllably transfer some or all of this rotational energy through a clutch (not shown) or a functionally similar device into the low-speed high-torque gear box 20 that is drivingly connected to the sail wheel assembly, or to a flywheel 22. The flywheel 22 may be used to store all of the excess or unused rotational energy resulting from the operation of the wind turbine 50 for later use such as when the wind current is flowing of such strength as not to be able to drivingly rotate the paddlewheel 51, in which case a differential in the gear box assembly 57 will drivingly connect the flywheel to the high-torque gearbox 20 to rotate the same sail wheel assembly.
Further, a transmission 59 also drivingly connected to the rotor shaft 53 through a differential 58 or a functionally similar device may further allow torque to be redirected tangentially to the outrigger's or craft's hull to operate electromechanical devices, electric generators and run any of the various gear assemblies of the craft's outside control surfaces. Further still, cable assembly 56 may be embedded in the interior of said transmission as control means for the sail rigging. In
In
Further, this aspect of the preferred embodiment of a novel sail-equipped aerostat that may include a multiple-hull structure with some amphibious capability and improved maneouverability is shown in various views in
Still further, in reference to
Another aspect of the sail-equipped aerostat with some amphibious capability and improved maneouverability having a wheel well (not shown) in the bottom of said outrigger hull, a wheel or landing skids for landing the craft on a runway, and apparatus for raising the wheel or landing skids into the wheel well and for lowering it for landing.
In another aspect of preferred embodiment of the present invention of a aerostatic craft equipped with a sail and with some amphibious capability having limited or nil aerodynamic control surfaces, the craft has the maneauvering means suitable to substantially affect orientation of the craft 10 along its pitch and yaw axis and that may further allow the craft to remain at station keeping. As seen in
Further shown in expanded view,
In
The winch may be operated manually or drivingly connected to a gear box (not shown) such that the clockwise or counterclockwise rotation of said winch 87 moves the gear-pully assembly 86 which in turn drivingly pulls in either direction the guide cables 84 and 85 to resultantly pull the ballast 81 forward to the bow or towards the rear of said craft, respectively. As the guide cable and load-bearing cables are collectively connected by clasp 88 both cable means may resultantly move in tandem and towards same direction, controllably moving the ballast 81 and in like manner has the effect of repositioning the craft's center of gravity . Thus, similar to the manner that a see-saw may tilt downwards at one end towards which one of the riders may be moving closer to, moving the ballast further to the aft may correspondingly relocate the center of gravity samely in the same direction, enabling the rear sections to become heavier, tilting same rear section downwards. This also has the effect of having the buoyant gas in the rear to rush and accumulate in the forward sections, substantially producing more lift effects and increased pitch.
As seen in
Further, said outriggers are made to freely rotate substantially by 180 degrees around its lateral horizontal axis.
The present invention claims priority to U.S. provisional application Ser. No. 61/754,526, filed on Jan. 18, 2013, the contents of which are incorporated by reference in their entirety herein.