The disclosure relates to a sample applicator apparatus, system and method, for use in a point of care diagnostic device for application of liquid samples.
Manual processing to determine the cellular/biological content of various types of biological samples, and in particular samples that contain living cells, is cost-prohibitive in many applications and is also prone to errors. Automation is also cost-prohibitive in many applications, and is inappropriate as currently practiced—using, for example, liquid handling robots—for applications such as point-of-care or doctor's office analysis.
There have been many recent advances in point-of-care diagnostic assay systems based on centrifugal microfluidic technologies. Such systems typically comprise i) a centrifugal microfluidic cartridge with reagent storage and sample processing methods, and ii) related device readers for interrogation of samples processed on such centrifugal microfluidic cartridges. However, there is an unmet need to provide a simple method of biological sample application, compared with current point-of-care centrifugal microfluidic based diagnostic assay systems, that i) is less prone to user error, ii) minimises biohazard and aerosol contamination risk, iii) removes the requirement of cartridge cleaning, iv) simplifies user workflow protocols v) simplifies cartridge manufacture and cost, and vi) integrates user fail-safe mechanisms.
Existing centrifugal-based point-of-care diagnostic assay systems typically use either i) an external transfer pipette for application of liquid samples, or ii) an inlet capillary port integrated on the cartridge, whereby the sample is applied directly onto the cartridge. While the cartridges associated with both system approaches can perform a variety of integrated sample preparation and assay tests—such as lateral flow assays, electrochemical assays, etc.—their sample application methods do not address the aforementioned unmet need.
Consider the first case of an external transfer pipette. In this instance, a biological sample is applied to the transfer pipette through capillary action upon contact by the pipette's tip with the sample. The pipette tip is then typically inserted into the centrifugal cartridge's inlet chamber which is situated close to the cartridge's centre. The sample is dispensed (or transferred), for example, through either an integrated air-displacement piston within the pipette or squeezing of a rubber bulb on top of the pipette, depending on the pipette's design. This sample application method suffers the risk of aerosol or biohazard contamination once the centrifugal cartridge is spun. While integrating an absorbent material into the cartridge's inlet chamber reduces this risk, it does not eliminate it, and further complicates the cartridge's manufacturing process. Covering the inlet chamber with a physical barrier increases cost and biohazard risk, and adds user workflow steps, thereby increasing user training requirements.
Consider the second case of an integrated inlet capillary port. In this instance, a biological sample is applied directly onto a cartridge's inlet capillary port from, for the example of whole blood, a patient's lanced finger. The inlet capillary port typically protrudes somewhat from the cartridge to facilitate both user operation and sample application. Such methods typically require advanced user training as positioning the inlet capillary port to contact the patient's finger can be problematic and lead to unsuccessful or poor quality application. Such integrated inlet capillary ports complicate the cartridge's manufacturing process adding to cost and reducing production yield. They also require the application of a physical barrier, as in the previous case, to minimise biohazard and aerosol contamination.
There are a numerous examples in the art which illustrate the first case. Examples include U.S. Pat. No. 4,898,832 (Boehringer Mannheim), JP 2008 032695 (Matsushita) U.S. Pat. No. 5,061,381 (Abaxis) and U.S. Pat. No. 6,143,248 (Gamera) which describe various sample processing methods, but all use external transfer pipettes to load the sample.
One such example of the second case in the art is US2009/205447 (Panasonic) which describes a system for transferring a sample liquid dispensed as a drop on an inlet port. The inlet port is formed to protrude in a direction away from the chamber, a recessed section is formed around the injection port, and the inlet port is arranged on the side of a rotating axis centre so that centrifugal force, upon its rotation, transfers the sample to said chamber. A hinged cover mechanism prevents biohazard and aerosol contamination.
It is therefore an object to provide a low-cost, simple sample application apparatus and method to address at least one problem known in the art.
According to the invention there is provided, as set out in the appended claims, a microfluidic system for applying biological samples comprising:
In one embodiment there is provided a microfluidic system for processing biological samples comprising:
In one embodiment the meniscus of the said applied biological sample at the transfer pipette tip is radially distal from the opposite meniscus within the said transfer pipette.
In one embodiment the transfer pipette is a capillary pipette comprising an air vent.
In one embodiment the radial distance of the sample meniscus proximate to the pipette tip is larger than the radial distance of the sample meniscus distal from the tip.
In one embodiment the transfer pipette comprises an air vent to ensure transfer of air during the biological sample application to, and dispensing from, the transfer pipette.
In one embodiment the force applied is a centrifugal force caused by rotation of the platform.
In one embodiment the said transfer pipette comprises a single-use locking mechanism adapted to prevent removal during rotation by the rotary motor.
In one embodiment the transfer pipette comprises a fluidic barrier such that the meniscus of the said applied biological sample at the transfer pipette tip is radially distal from the opposite meniscus within the said transfer pipette.
In one embodiment there is provided a fluidic barrier within the transfer pipette prevents the escape of biological sample through the opposite end of the transfer pipette.
In one embodiment the biological sample is replaced with an otherwise constituted sample of liquid form.
In another embodiment there is provided a transfer pipette for use with a microfluidic system to process biological samples comprising:
a channel to collect and store the biological sample; and
In a further embodiment there is provided method of processing biological samples in a microfluidic comprising the steps of:
While this invention relates and applies to a myriad biological samples, such as whole blood, saliva, serum, sweat, etc., the specific embodiment described herein concentrates on the sampling of whole blood from a patient's finger.
The invention will be more clearly understood from the following description of an embodiment thereof, given by way of example only, with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:
Herein is described a sample application method comprising a transfer pipette wherein a sample is applied to same through capillary action, said pipette is inserted into a receiving chamber on a centrifugal cartridge, with the pipette designed to ensure the sample is dispensed into an integrated output chamber.
The output chamber 307 is arranged to be distal from the leading sample meniscus. Subsequent sample processing elsewhere in the cartridge may occur through methods and structures connected to the outlet channel 308.
In operation the transfer pipette is designed such that capillary forces retain the sample, unless a pressure is applied to overcome them. When a rotational velocity is applied by the rotary motor to generate a centrifugal force, the net flow of sample in a centrifugal microfluidic cartridge structure will always be radially outwards, i.e. from a proximal radius towards a distal radius. Therefore, once a rotational velocity is applied to generate a centrifugal force greater than the capillary forces at the pipette's tip, the sample will dispense into the distal output chamber, enabled by air displacement through the air vent 309, once the condition r2>r1 is maintained. To maintain the relationship, r2>r1, the height of the applied sample within the transfer pipette, y, should not exceed two times x (2×), where 2× is defined by mirroring x around ℄1, always noting that ℄1 is perpendicular to the receiving chamber. A fluidic barrier 310 can be used to minimise the risk of applied sample dispensing into the outside environment prior to application of centrifugal force through the rotary motor's rotation, or otherwise, and can also be positioned to ensure y<2×, by design.
In practice, the aforementioned parameters are dimensioned such that once sufficient centrifugal force is applied to overcome the capillary forces at the tip of the transfer pipette, the sample is dispensed into the more distal output chamber. To avoid inadvertent movement, or removal, of the transfer pipette upon generation of centrifugal force by the rotation of the rotary motor, a single-use locking mechanism 311 may be used, or design variants of same.
The embodiments in the invention described with reference to the drawings may comprise a computer apparatus and/or processes performed in a computer apparatus.
However, the invention also extends to computer programs, particularly computer programs stored on or in a carrier adapted to bring the invention into practice. The program may be in the form of source code, object code, or a code intermediate source and object code, such as in partially compiled form or in any other form suitable for use in the implementation of the method according to the invention. The carrier may comprise a storage medium such as ROM, e.g. CD ROM, or magnetic recording medium, e.g. a floppy disk or hard disk. The carrier may be an electrical or optical signal which may be transmitted via an electrical or an optical cable or by radio or other means.
In the specification the terms “comprise, comprises, comprised and comprising” or any variation thereof and the terms include, includes, included and including” or any variation thereof are considered to be totally interchangeable and they should all be afforded the widest possible interpretation and vice versa.
The invention is not limited to the embodiments hereinbefore described but may be varied in both construction and detail.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
14167545 | May 2014 | EP | regional |
This is the national phase under 35 U.S.C. § 371 of International Application No. PCT/EP2015/060216, filed on May 8, 2015, which claims priority to and the benefit of European Patent Application No. 14167545.4, filed on May 8, 2014 and U.S. Patent Application No. 61/990,611, filed on May 8, 2014, the entire disclosures of each of which are incorporated by reference herein.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2015/060216 | 5/8/2015 | WO | 00 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2015/169956 | 11/12/2015 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2728232 | Bremmer | Dec 1955 | A |
3952599 | Ayres | Apr 1976 | A |
4740472 | Burtis et al. | Apr 1988 | A |
4847205 | Burtis et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
4898832 | Klose et al. | Feb 1990 | A |
4916078 | Klose et al. | Apr 1990 | A |
5061381 | Burd | Oct 1991 | A |
6143248 | Kellogg et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6531098 | Kenney | Mar 2003 | B1 |
8158079 | Sugimoto et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
20010019842 | Kitamura | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20020150512 | Kellogg et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20060023208 | Murakami | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20090205447 | Sugimoto et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20100233798 | Kim | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100281961 | Saiki | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20110117665 | Saiki | May 2011 | A1 |
20130078149 | Holmes | Mar 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0211334 | Feb 1987 | EP |
2008032695 | Feb 2008 | JP |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report and Written Opinion from PCT/EP2015/060216 dated Sep. 9, 2015. |
Burtis et al., “Development of a Simple Device for Processing Whole-Blood Samples into Measured Aliquots of Plasma”, Clinical Chemistry, 32(9):1642-1647, 1986. |
Burtis et al., “Automated processing of whole blood samples into microliter aliquots of plasma”, Journal of Automatic Chemistry, 10(1):6-9, 1988. |
EPO Communication pursuant to Rule 114(2) EPC for EPO Application No. 15725519.1 dated Mar. 26, 2018, 4 pages. |
EPO Communication pursuant to Rule 114(2) EPC for EPO Application No. 15725519.1 dated Apr. 17, 2018, 4 pages. |
EPO Communication pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC for EPO Application No. 15725519.1 dated Jul. 9, 2018, 7 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20170128936 A1 | May 2017 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61990611 | May 2014 | US |