The present invention relates to a sample measurement device, sample measurement method, and sample measurement program for measuring a sample during cell culture, for example.
A conventional cell culture analysis device comprises a base, a sensor that is fixed in a through-hole portion provided to the base, and a lead wire that is connected to the sensor for taking off signals.
For example, Patent Literature 1 discloses a sensor that is immersed in a liquid cell culture medium and measures the cell culture environment within the medium.
Patent Literature 2 discloses a configuration comprising a lifting mechanism (elevator) for disposing a sensor in a culture medium.
Patent Literature 3 discloses a device and a method with which a sensor is immersed in a medium in a container, and cells contained in the medium are analyzed.
However, the conventional sensors, devices, and methods mentioned above have the following problem.
Cell culture is generally carried out by pouring a medium into a well plate including a plurality of recessed portions (wells), so there is sometimes variance in the amount of medium put into each well. Consequently, in performing cell culture with the sensor immersed in the medium, there is the risk that the worker may forget to add the medium, or that the part of the sensor including the measurement electrode may not be sufficiently immersed due to variance in the amount of medium, resulting in measurement error.
Also, since cell culture is performed in an environment of high-temperature and -humidity, there is the risk that mold or other such impurities (contamination) may adhere to the sensor and adversely affect the measurement result.
Accordingly, the conventional configuration described above did not take into account the possibility of improper sensor immersion or contamination by mold or the like, making it difficult to accurately detect the occurrence of measurement errors attributable to improper immersion of the sensor, contamination, or the like.
It is an object of the present invention to provide a sample measurement device, sample measurement method, and sample measurement program with which measurement errors attributable to improper sensor immersion, contamination, etc., can be detected in order to make accurate measurements.
The sample measurement device according to the present invention comprises a voltage application unit, a current measurement unit, a concentration measurement unit, a counter electrode terminal voltage measurement unit, and a measurement error detection unit. The voltage application unit applies voltage to the electrode unit of the sample measurement sensor to which voltage is applied in a state in which the electrode unit including at least a working electrode, a counter electrode, and a reference electrode is immersed in the sample. The current measurement unit measures the current flowing through the sample measurement sensor by the voltage applied to the electrode unit. The concentration measurement unit calculates the concentration of the analyte contained in the sample on the basis of the measurement result from the current measurement unit. The counter electrode terminal voltage measurement unit measures the terminal voltage of the counter electrode included in the electrode unit in a state in which voltage is applied by the voltage application unit. The measurement error detection unit detects a measurement error on the basis of the counter electrode terminal voltage measured by the counter electrode terminal voltage measurement unit.
With the sample measurement device according to the present invention, the occurrence of measurement errors attributable to improper sensor immersion, contamination, and the like can be detected in order to perform more accurate measurement.
A cell culture measurement device (sample measurement device) 1 according to an embodiment of the present invention will now be described through reference to
In this embodiment, some unnecessarily detailed description may be omitted. For example, detailed description of already known facts or redundant description of components that are substantially the same may be omitted. This is to avoid unnecessary repetition in the following description, and facilitate an understanding on the part of a person skilled in the art.
The applicant has provided the appended drawings and the following description so that a person skilled in the art might fully understand this disclosure, but does not intend for these to limit what is discussed in the patent claims.
The cell culture analysis device 1 of this embodiment electrochemically senses the concentration of a specific component (such as glucose or lactic acid) contained in a medium X in a state in which part of a sensor (sample measurement sensor) 30 has been immersed in a culture medium (liquid sample) held in a well plate 25 (see
As shown in
A transparent door 3a attached to the front of the incubator 3 is opened, and the analysis unit 2 is placed in the internal space. The control unit 4 connected to the analysis unit 2 via the electrical cable 5 is disposed on the outside of the incubator 3.
This allows the user to use the control unit 4 to analyze the culture state in the incubator 3 without opening or closing the door 3a of the incubator 3, and thereby prevents contamination of the air in the incubator 3.
The analysis unit 2 is designed to be short in the lateral (width) direction, short in the height direction, and long in the depth direction so that a plurality of analysis units 2 can be installed in the incubator 3.
As shown in
Also, as shown in
The analysis unit 2 is configured to be lifted toward a probe holder (not shown) by an lifting mechanism 23 in a state in which the sensor-equipped culture module 20 has been pulled into the main body 21 by the pull-out part 22.
The detailed configuration of the analysis unit 2 will be described in detail below.
As shown in
The configuration for suppressing the occurrence of measurement errors, including contamination errors attributable to the adhesion of mold or other impurities to the sensor surface, and improper immersion errors in which the sensor 30 is not sufficiently immersed in the medium X, after the sensor-equipped culture module 20 is moved from a room-temperature environment to a high-temperature and -humidity environment, will be described in detail below.
The sensor 30 is configured, for example, by forming a carbon electrode layer by sputtering on the upper surface of a PET (polyethylene terephthalate) film, which is a resin material. As shown in
The main body portion 31 is a substantially rectangular, flat member, and is linked at its upper end to the bent portion 32.
As shown in
The measurement electrodes included in the sensing unit 31a are formed by transpiring the electrode layer with a laser and dividing the electrode layer. An electrode pattern may be formed by screen printing on each measurement electrode in order to improve the insulation between the wiring.
Here, when measuring the concentration of glucose contained in the medium X, for example, the reagent layer immobilized on the surface of the working electrodes may contain a glucose oxidase, such as glucose oxidase (GOx), glucose dehydrogenase (GDH), or even a redox mediator.
The concentration of glucose is measured by allowing the glucose that has permeated from the medium X through a protective film to react with the enzyme in the reagent layer (such as Gox or GDH) and be oxidized into gluconolactone, and converting the reduced product of a redox mediator produced at the same time, or the electrons generated by the oxidation reaction of hydrogen peroxide, into a current value.
As shown in
As shown in
As shown in
Of the four measurement electrodes included in the sensing unit 31a, the working electrode 31aa is disposed at the left end of the main body portion 31 of the sensor 30, and includes a reagent layer 35 coated with a reagent for measuring lactic acid. Also, as shown in
Consequently, since the reagent layer 35 is provided on the upper surface of the working electrode 31aa, the lactic acid that has permeated through the protective film 37 reacts with the reagent in the reagent layer 35, which causes the current value measured at the working electrode 31aa to change. This allows a change in the concentration of lactic acid contained in the medium X to be detected by detecting a change in this current value.
The counter electrode 31ab is disposed between the working electrode 31aa and the reference electrode 31ac in the main body portion 31 of the sensor 30. Also, as shown in FIG. 9B, the counter electrode 31ab is provided in an exposed state, without the reagent layer or the protective film being provided, so that its surface is in direct contact with the medium X.
Consequently, in measuring the counter electrode terminal voltage (discussed below), if there are impurities (contamination) such as mold that cover the surface of the counter electrode 31ab, for example, a contamination error can be detected very accurately by detecting with high sensitivity any change in the counter electrode voltage that occurs as a result of a reduction in the surface area of the counter electrode 31ab.
Also, the electrode portion of the counter electrode 31ab is formed from carbon. Since this carbon is more textured and porous than an electrode made of gold or the like, mold easily adheres to the surface of the counter electrode 31ab, making it more likely that the reaction surface area of the electrode will decrease and the occurrence of contamination will be detected.
As shown in
The working electrode 31ad is disposed at the right end of the main body portion 31 of the sensor 30, and includes the reagent layer 35 coated with a reagent for measuring glucose. Also, as shown in
Consequently, since the reagent layer 35 is provided on the upper surface of the working electrode 31ad, the glucose that has permeated through the protective film 37 reacts with the reagent in the reagent layer 35, resulting in a change in the current value measured at the working electrode 31ad. This allows a change in the concentration of glucose contained in the medium X to be detected by detecting the change in this current value.
The protective film 37 is provided to prevent silver chloride or the like provided on the reagent layer 35 and the reference electrode 31ac containing reagents that are toxic to the cells being cultured from eluting into the medium X. Also, providing the protective film 37 makes possible long-term measurement, such as for 14 days, by suppressing the permeability of the analyte (glucose and lactic acid) and limiting the reactivity of the reagent contained in the reagent layer 35.
Here, the working electrodes 31aa and 31ad are formed so as to be exposed through an opening that is substantially circular in plan view. This allows the protective film 37 provided on the upper surfaces of the working electrodes 31aa and 31ad to be applied substantially evenly.
On the other hand, as discussed above, the counter electrode 31ab is not provided with a reagent layer or a protective film, so it is formed to be discharged from a substantially rectangular opening so that the surface area in contact with the medium X will be as large as possible. This improves the sensitivity at which the counter electrode terminal voltage is measured when a measurement error is detected (discussed below).
The four electrodes 31c are provided to the upper part of the sensor 30 as contacts that are electrically connected to the cell culture analysis device 1 (probe holder (not shown)). The electrodes 31c are electrically connected to the measurement electrodes (working electrodes 31aa, 31ad, counter electrode 31ab, reference electrode 31ac) included in the sensing unit 31a disposed at the lower part of the main body portion 31 of the sensor 30.
In this embodiment, as shown in
Consequently, since the sensors 30 are attached to the upper surface of the bottom plate 27 in a state of being linked together by the linking portions 33, the positions of the linked sensors 30 can be accurately defined.
This improves the positional accuracy (position, angle, etc.) of each sensor 30 with respect to the plurality of wells (culture vessels) 25a included in the well plate 25.
As a result, the immersion depth of each sensor 30 in the medium X placed in a well 25a becomes substantially constant, which allows stable measurement results to be obtained.
Meanwhile, although the positional accuracy of each sensor 30 with respect to the well 15a is improved, the well plate 25 includes a plurality of (24 in this embodiment) wells 25a. Accordingly, it is difficult to accurately pour the specified amount of medium X into each well 25a, and there is the risk that errors such as forgetting to add the medium X, or pouring in the wrong amount may occur. Consequently, there is the risk that there will be variance in the amount of medium X put into each well 25a, and when the sensing unit 31a of the sensor 30 is immersed in the medium X in the well 25a, that an improper immersion error may occur in which there is not enough medium X and the sensing unit 31a is not sufficiently immersed.
Furthermore, since the environment in which cell culture is performed is a high-temperature and -humidity environment as mentioned above, mold or other such impurities (contaminants) are more apt to be a problem during cell culture. For example, if mold or other such impurities (contaminants) adhere to and grow on the surface of the sensor 30 while the sensor is immersed in the medium X, there is the risk of adversely affecting the measurement result for the measurement target (glucose, lactic acid).
With the cell culture analysis device 1 of this embodiment, in order to detect the occurrence of such measurement errors (improper immersion error, contamination error) with high accuracy, the analysis unit 2 comprises an electrochemical measurement unit 11, a control unit 12, a storage unit 13, and a communication unit 14 as shown in
The electrochemical measurement unit 11 is a potentiostat that measures the concentration of a measurement target by applying a specific voltage to the electrodes of a sensor 30 having a three-electrode configuration, and as shown in
The voltage application unit 11a applies a specific voltage for measuring the concentration of glucose and lactic acid contained in the medium X to the sensor 30 having the three-electrode configuration mentioned above.
The current measurement unit 11b detects a change in the value of the current flowing through the sensor 30, which is measured by applying a voltage to the electrodes of the sensor 30 from the voltage application unit 11a. This allows the concentration of lactic acid to be measured according to the change in the value of the current flowing through the working electrode 31aa, and the concentration of glucose to be measured according to the change in the value of the current flowing through the working electrode 31ad (see
The voltage measurement unit 11c measures the terminal voltage of the counter electrode 31ab of the sensor 30 in order to detect the occurrence of a measurement error (improper immersion error, contamination error). The result measured by the voltage measurement unit 11c is transmitted to the control unit 4 via the communication unit 14.
As shown in
As shown in
As shown in
As shown in
The display unit 41 displays, as the result of analysis by the analysis unit 42, the change in the concentration of glucose and lactic acid based on the sensor current value measured by the current measurement unit 11b, the measurement error detection result based on the value of the counter electrode terminal voltage measured by the voltage measurement unit 11c, and so forth.
The analysis unit 42 is, for example, a PC (personal computer), and performs metabolic analysis of the cells during culture by measuring the concentrations of lactic acid and glucose (the measurement targets) on the basis of the change in the sensor current flowing through the working electrodes 31aa and 31ad as measured by the current measurement unit 11b. Also, the analysis unit 42 detects whether there is any measurement error (contamination error, improper immersion error; (discussed below)) on the basis of the change in the counter electrode terminal voltage measured by the voltage measurement unit 11c.
The cell culture analysis device 1 of this embodiment has the configuration described above, and measures the counter electrode terminal voltage with the voltage measurement unit 11c to detect any measurement errors, including contamination errors in which mold or another such impurity adheres to the sensor surface and reduces the accuracy of the measurement result, and improper immersion errors in which the sensor is not sufficiently immersed due to variance in the amount of medium X put into the wells 25a of the well plate 25.
Here, the principle by which measurement errors can be detected by measuring the counter electrode terminal voltage will be explained through reference to
When the circuit within the sensor 30 shown in
In other words, a change in the counter electrode terminal voltage in the direction in which the current on the counter electrode 31ab side increases is equivalent to an increase in the reaction per unit of electrode surface area in the counter electrode 3 lab. This means that the drive force of the counter electrode 31ab is greater, that is, as shown in
Therefore, in terms of the circuit, as shown in
Consequently, when impurities such as mold are generated and proliferate on the surface of the sensor 30 installed in a high-temperature and -humidity environment, and particularly on the surface of the counter electrode 31ab, the counter electrode terminal voltage drops off sharply, for example.
Because of this, with the cell culture analysis device 1 of this embodiment, by measuring the counter electrode terminal voltage, contamination errors and improper immersion errors occurring in the sensor 30 are detected, which avoids measurement of the concentration of glucose concentration and lactic acid from being made in a state of diminished accuracy.
More specifically, with the cell culture analysis device 1 of this embodiment, as shown in
This skip period is set because, for several hours immediately after the start of voltage application to the sensor 30, there is the risk that the counter electrode terminal voltage will rise change significantly depending on the state of the sensor 30 before voltage application, so there is the risk that there will be variance in the measurement result.
After the sensor 30 is immersed in the medium X, up until the point when the voltage is applied, the action of the mediator reagent causes the amount of reducing substances to increase. This creates a difference in the magnitude of the sensor current flowing immediately after voltage application depending on how long it takes from immersion of the sensor 30 until the application of voltage. That is, the longer is the time from immersion to voltage application, the larger is the amount of sensor current. Therefore, in terms of the circuit, in order to cause a large current equivalent to that of the working electrodes 31aa and 31ad to flow through the counter electrode 31ab, the terminal voltage of the counter electrode 31ab is controlled to decrease.
For this reason, the several hours immediately after the start of voltage application, in which the rate of fluctuation of the counter electrode terminal voltage is more likely to increase, is set as a skip period (dead zone).
The detection of a contamination error will now be described through reference to
As shown in
At this point, the counter electrode terminal voltage also decreases due to cell metabolism, but if there is contamination, this decrease will be even sharper than during cell metabolism (the negative rate of change is higher than during cell metabolism).
Consequently, the analysis unit 42 determines whether or not the negative rate of change in the counter electrode terminal voltage is below a specific threshold value, and if it is below the specific threshold value, it is determined that a contamination error has occurred, and the display unit 41 displays that a contamination error has occurred, which allows the user to be notified of the occurrence of an abnormality.
Next, the detection of an improper immersion error will be described through reference to
If the sensing unit 31a of the sensor 30 is sufficiently immersed in the medium X, the operational amplifier output connected to the counter electrode 31ab and the operational amplifier inverting input connected to the reference electrode 31ac are connected via the liquid, forming a closed loop. The operational amplifier output voltage connected to the counter electrode 31ab varies within a specific range so that “the voltage of the operational amplifier inverting input” connected to the reference electrode 31ac and “the voltage of the operational amplifier non-inverting input” connected to the DA converter used for setting the reference electrode voltage will be equal.
On the other hand, if an immersion error occurs in which the sensing unit 31a of the sensor 30 is not sufficiently immersed in the medium X, the operational amplifier output connected to the counter electrode 31ab and the operational amplifier inverting input connected to the reference electrode 31ac are not connected via the liquid, resulting in an open loop.
Therefore, the operational amplifier operates as a comparator, and the operational amplifier output voltage (counter electrode terminal voltage) connected to the counter electrode 31ab becomes either Low or High in the initial stage (during the skip period). That is, either the counter electrode terminal voltage bottoms out (drops almost to zero) or peaks out (roughly the maximum output voltage of the operational amplifier).
If there is no problem with the immersion state at the start of voltage application, it is unlikely that an immersion error will occur midway through cell culture in a high-temperature and -humidity environment. That is, as long as the specified amount of medium X has been poured into the well 25a, there will be no immersion error even if some of the medium X evaporates during cell culture.
Consequently, the analysis unit 42 determines whether or not the counter electrode terminal voltage has deviated from the specified range during the skip period, and if it has deviated from the specified range, it is determined that an immersion error has occurred, and the display unit 41 displays that an immersion error has occurred, thereby notifying the user of the occurrence of an abnormality.
As described above, with the cell culture analysis device 1 of this embodiment, the above-mentioned measurement errors (contamination errors and improper immersion errors) are detected by measuring the counter electrode terminal voltage related to the counter electrode 31ab of the three-electrode sensor 30.
Here, the flow of processing in a measurement error detection method will be described through reference to the flowchart in
That is, in step S1, after the voltage application unit 11a included in the electrochemical measurement unit 11 of the analysis unit 2 has applied a specific voltage to the sensor 30, the analysis unit 42 receives the counter electrode terminal voltage of the counter electrode 31ab included in the sensor 30, from the voltage measurement unit 11c via the communication unit 14.
Next, in step S12, the analysis unit 42 determines whether or not the received counter electrode terminal voltage is a result measured within the skip period.
Here, if the measurement result was during the skip period, the processing proceeds to the immersion error determination processing from step S13 onward. On the other hand, if the measurement result was not during the skip period, and was instead a measurement result after the skip period had elapsed, the processing proceeds to the contamination error determination processing from step S17 onward.
Next, in step S13, since the received counter electrode terminal voltage was determined in step S12 to be a measurement result during the skip period, the analysis unit 42 determines whether or not the value of the counter electrode terminal voltage is outside the specified range in order to determine whether there is an immersion error.
Here, if the value of the counter electrode terminal voltage is outside the specified range, it is determined that an immersion error has occurred, and the processing proceeds to step S14. On the other hand, if the value of the counter electrode terminal voltage is within the specified range, it is determined that no immersion error has occurred, and the processing proceeds to step S16.
Next, in step S14, since it was determined in step S13 that the value of the counter electrode terminal voltage was outside the specified range, it is determined whether or not the user has been notified on the display unit 41 about the immersion error that appears to have occurred.
Here, if notification has been given, the processing proceeds to step S16, but if no notification has been given, the processing proceeds to step S15.
Next, in step S15, in order to notify of the occurrence of an immersion error that has not yet been reported, the display unit 41 displays a message to the effect that an immersion error has occurred. If the voltage is still being applied in a state in which the sensing unit 31a of the sensor 30 is not sufficiently immersed in the culture medium X, there is the risk that the sensor 30 will malfunction, so the control unit 12 halts the application of voltage from the voltage application unit 11a to the sensor 30, and the processing proceeds to step S22.
Next, in step S16, since it was determined in step S13 that the value of the counter electrode terminal voltage was within the specified range, or it was determined in step S14 that the occurrence of an immersion error had been reported, it is determined whether or not to continue the culture.
Here, if the user selects to continue the culture, the processing goes back to step S11 and measurement error determination processing is repeated. On the other hand, if the user chooses not to continue the culture, the processing is ended.
On the other hand, in step S17, since the received counter electrode terminal voltage was determined in step S12 to be a measurement result outside the skip period, the analysis unit 42 calculates the negative rate of change in the counter electrode terminal voltage over the elapsed time in order to determine whether or not there is a contamination error.
Next, in step S18, it is determined whether or not the negative rate of change in the counter electrode terminal voltage calculated in step S17 is below a specific threshold value.
Here, if this rate of change is below the threshold value, it is determined that a contamination error has occurred, and the processing proceeds to step S19. On the other hand, if the rate of change is at or above the threshold, the processing proceeds to step S21.
Next, in step S19, since it was determined in step S18 that the negative rate of change of the counter electrode terminal voltage was below the specified threshold, it is determined whether or not the display unit 41 has notified the user that a contamination error seems to have occurred.
Here, if the user has been notified, the processing proceeds to step S21, but if the user has not been notified, the processing proceeds to step S20.
Next, in step S20, the display unit 41 displays that a contamination error has occurred in order to notify of the occurrence of a contamination error that has not yet been reported.
Next, in step S21, since it was determined in step S18 that the rate of change of the counter electrode terminal voltage was at or above the specific threshold value, or it was determined in step S19 that the user has been notified of the occurrence of a contamination error, it is determined whether or not to continue the culture. Here, if the user chooses to continue the culture, the processing returns to step S11 and measurement error determination processing is repeated. On the other hand, if the user chooses not to continue the culture, the processing is ended.
Next, in step S22, after notifying of the occurrence of an immersion error in step S15, and notifying of the occurrence of a contamination error in step S20, it is selected whether or not to halt the culture.
At this point, the user can choose whether or not to halt the culture, but normally if mold or the like has adhered, it is determined that the culture cannot be continued, and the processing is ended.
Main Features As shown in
Consequently, if the sensing unit 31a of the sensor 30 is not sufficiently immersed in the medium X, or if mold or another such impurity has adhered to the surface of the sensor 30, the occurrence of measurement errors can be detected with high accuracy by monitoring changes in the counter electrical terminal voltage indicating a certain behavior.
As a result, measurement errors caused by improper sensor immersion, contamination, or the like can be detected with high accuracy, and glucose, lactic acid, or some other such measurement target can be accurately measured.
An embodiment of the present invention was described above, but the present invention is not limited to the above embodiment, and various changes are possible without departing from the gist of the invention.
In the above embodiment, an example was given in which the present invention was realized as a sample measurement device and a sample measurement method. However, the present invention is not limited to this.
For example, the present invention may be realized as a sample measurement program that causes a computer to execute the sample measurement method featuring the sample measurement device described above.
This sample measurement program is stored in a memory (storage unit) installed in the sample measurement device, and the CPU reads the sample measurement program stored in the memory and causes the hardware to execute the various steps. More specifically, the CPU reads the sample measurement program and executes the above-mentioned voltage application step, current measurement step, concentration measurement step, counter terminal voltage measurement step, and measurement error detection step, which allows the same effect as above to be obtained.
Also, the present invention may be realized as a recording medium that stores a sample measurement program.
In the above embodiment, an example was given in which the concentration measurement unit and the measurement error detection unit included in the sample measurement device of the present invention were provided as the analysis unit 42 on the control unit 4 side. However, the present invention is not limited to this.
For example, the configuration may be such that the control unit 12 on the analysis unit 2 side functions as a concentration measurement unit and a measurement error detection unit.
In the above embodiment, an example was given in which the sensor 30 included the two working electrodes 31aa and 31ad for glucose measurement and lactic acid measurement, but the present invention is not limited to this.
For example, the sensor may have a three-electrode configuration provided with one working electrode, one counter electrode, and one reference electrode.
In the above embodiment, an example was given in which the sample measurement device of the present invention was applied to the cell culture analysis device 1. However, the present invention is not limited to this.
For example, the present invention may be applied to a device other than one used in cell culture, and to a measurement device that measures a sample.
In the above embodiment, an example was given in which the sensor 30 measured the concentrations of glucose and lactic acid as the measurement targets. However, the present invention is not limited to this.
For example, the measurement target is not limited to glucose and lactic acid, and may be some other substance.
In the above embodiment, an example was given in which the sensor 30 was used in a state of having been bent at the bent portion 32. However, the present invention is not limited to this.
For example, a sensor that has not been bent may be used.
Here again, by using a configuration in which a plurality of sensors are linked by a linking portion at the upper end portion of the main body of each sensor affords the same effect as described above, that of improving the positional accuracy of the sensors.
In the above embodiment, an example was given in which the sensor 30 was used, which was substantially an upside-down T-shape. However, the present invention is not limited to this.
For example, a substantially I-shaped or substantially L-shaped sensor may be used instead.
In the above embodiment, an example was given in which the sample measurement device of the present invention was applied to a cell culture analysis device. However, the present invention is not limited to this.
For example, the present invention may be applied to a device that measures samples unrelated to cell culture.
The sample measurement device of the present invention exhibits the effect that measurement errors attributable to improper sensor immersion, contamination, etc., can be detected in order to take more accurate measurements, and is therefore not limited to the field of cell culture, and is broadly applicable to devices that measure various kinds of sample.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2022-010830 | Jan 2022 | JP | national |
This application is a Continuation of International Patent Application No. PCT/JP2022/046633, filed on Dec. 19, 2022, which in turn claims the benefit of Japanese Patent Application No. 2022-010830, filed on Jan. 27, 2022, the entire disclosure of which Applications are incorporated by reference herein.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | PCT/JP2022/046633 | Dec 2022 | WO |
Child | 18749209 | US |