Not Applicable
Not Applicable
This invention relates to sampling methods used in analytical instrumentation.
Rotation of samples placed in many chemical analyzers is important for obtaining good analysis results. Analyzers possess a location where the sample is placed, which for this discussion will be called the sampling point. This is typically a small, precise location defined by an analyzing beam or a focal point or a combination of these and other factors. Since this point is small, the amount of sample analyzed is also quite small and many not represent the properties of the bulk sample. This problem can be reduced by constantly moving the sample to analyze a greater proportion. In practice, this is often done by placing the sample in cylindrical sample containers such as tubes or vials and rotating it as it is analyzed. The resulting signal is an integration of the results from the material that is rotated into the sampling point and is therefore more representative of the whole. In some cases where the analyzing beam can heat or otherwise affect the sample if it is on the same material for too long of time, rotation can also be used to present new material to the analyzing beam thus reduce its adverse effects. Since the sampling point is a precise location, the position of the sample within the sample container must consistently remain at the sampling point of the instrument for good results during rotation.
Prior designs of sample rotators use a chuck or circular holder for the sample container. Changing to different size sample containers require changing to a different chuck or changing settings on an adjustable chuck. The sample containers must be carefully centered within the chuck on the axis of rotation since any deviation will move the material in the sample container from the sampling point as it is rotated and will affect the data collected. Prior designs necessitate the use of a small chuck that holds the sample container from the bottom and leaving the top of the container unsupported to avoid obstructing the instruments view of the sampling point during rotation, allowing the potential for the container to tip or move during rotation.
The new invention was designed overcome a number of the disadvantages of the previous design. It automatically adjusts to continuously accommodate any size cylindrical sample container from a minimum to a maximum size. There is no need to adjust the location of the axis of rotation since the material in the sample container is held at the sampling point during rotation. The design provides better support as the sample container is held multiple points at different heights and locations greatly reducing the potential tipping or movement during rotation.
The system works by having fixed contact points that retain the sample container on one side while it is pushed by a movable, tensioned drive wheel on the other. The surface of the material within the sample container is maintained at a constant point in space defined by the location of the fixed contact points. These fixed contact points consist of four points, two on each side of the sample container with two below and two above the sampling point. The locations of the fixed points are placed so as to not obstruct the analysis equipment's view of the sampling points and yet retain the sample container.
The present invention through the use of fixed contact points to determine the location of the material in a cylindrical sampling container during rotation, alleviates a number of problems associated with prior designs.
The preferred embodiment of the system is illustrated in
In
Conclusion Ramifications and Scope
From the preceding discussion, it can be seen that the invention represents a number of advantages over prior versions of sample rotators.
Thus the scope of the invention should be determined by the appended claims and their legal equivalents, rather then by the examples given.
This application claims the benefit of PPA Ser. Nr. 60/423,451 filed Nov. 4, 2002 by the present inventor
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1414197 | Maddox | Apr 1922 | A |
1445488 | Clark | Feb 1923 | A |
1983164 | Bush | Dec 1934 | A |
2006451 | Glidden | Jul 1935 | A |
2185979 | Dumas | Jan 1940 | A |
2346613 | Rumsey, Jr. | Apr 1944 | A |
2653015 | Andrews | Sep 1953 | A |
2757911 | Varady | Aug 1956 | A |
2874873 | Newell | Feb 1959 | A |
2944799 | Larson | Jul 1960 | A |
3097834 | Hurst | Jul 1963 | A |
3194542 | Pfeifer | Jul 1965 | A |
3578292 | Montague | May 1971 | A |
3669433 | Hurst | Jun 1972 | A |
3711379 | Adams | Jan 1973 | A |
3734470 | Dreher | May 1973 | A |
3764112 | Jelley | Oct 1973 | A |
3777652 | Engel | Dec 1973 | A |
3830475 | Inoue et al. | Aug 1974 | A |
4173418 | Vork | Nov 1979 | A |
4227794 | Tabin | Oct 1980 | A |
4229138 | Hurst | Oct 1980 | A |
4277185 | Thompson | Jul 1981 | A |
4281936 | Schotter et al. | Aug 1981 | A |
4307965 | Catarious et al. | Dec 1981 | A |
D263307 | Collins | Mar 1982 | S |
4669274 | Huang | Jun 1987 | A |
4754658 | Gutknecht | Jul 1988 | A |
4785727 | Miyata et al. | Nov 1988 | A |
4785728 | Miyata et al. | Nov 1988 | A |
5299864 | Reynolds et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5300438 | Augspurger et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5884999 | Muzzio et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
6325533 | Kelley | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6450681 | Nettelhoff et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6948844 | Zeeper | Sep 2005 | B1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2713678 | Oct 1978 | DE |
54-86674 | Jul 1979 | JP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20040095845 A1 | May 2004 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60423451 | Nov 2002 | US |