The invention relates to improved sample test cards, which have an increased sample well capacity for analyzing biological or other samples.
Sample test cards have been used to analyze blood or other biological samples in a spectroscopic or other automated reading machine. Such machines receive a small test card, roughly the size of a playing card, in which biological reagents, nutrients or other material is deposited and sealed, prior to injection of patient samples.
The test card contains the reagents and receives the patient samples in a series of small wells, formed in the card in rows and columns and sealed, typically with tape on both sides. The test cards are filled with patient sample material through fine hydraulic channels formed in the card. The microorganisms in the samples may then be permitted to grow or reactions to proceed, generally over a period of up to a few hours, although the period varies with the type of bacteria or other substance analyzed and sample used.
The current assignee has commercialized instruments for fast, accurate microbial identification, and antimicrobial susceptibility testing (e.g., Vitek® 2 and Vitek® Compact). These instruments include an incubation stations that maintains sample test cards at a precisely controlled temperature to enhance microorganism growth in the individual sample wells. The incubation station includes a rotating carousel that has a plurality of slots for receiving test sample cards. The carousel is vertically mounted and rotates about a horizontal axis. This rotation about the horizontal axis during incubation causes the test card to be rotated through 360° from a normal “upright” card position, through an “inverted” or “upside-down” card position and then back again to an “upright” position. After the incubation, the samples contained in the wells are placed in front of a laser, fluorescent light or other illumination source. The content of the sample in a given well can then be deduced according to readings on the spectrum, intensity or other characteristics of the transmitted or reflected radiation, since the culture of different bacteria or other agents leave distinctive signatures related to turbidity, density, byproducts, coloration, fluorescence and so forth. The instruments for reading the test cards and the incubation carousel are further described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,762,873; 5,888,455; 5,965,090; 6,024,921; 6,086,824; 6,136,270; 6,156,565; and 7,601,300, the contents of which are incorporated herein by reference herein.
Despite the general success of test cards in this area, there is an ongoing desire to improve the performance of the cards and readings on their samples. It is for example an advantage to impress more reaction wells in a given card, so that a greater variety of reactions and therefore discrimination of samples can be realized. A given facility may have only one such machine, or be pressed for continuous analysis of samples of many patients, as at a large hospital. Conducting as many identifying reactions on each sample as possible is frequently desirable, yielding greater overall throughput.
It has also been the case that as the total number of reaction wells on a given card has increased, while the card size has remained constant, the wells have necessarily been formed increasingly close together. With the sample wells crowding each other on the card, it has become more likely that the sample contained in one well can travel to the next well, to contaminate the second well. The threat of increased contamination comes into play especially as card well capacity increases above 30 wells.
The current Vitek® 2 disposable product family uses a sample test card containing 64 individual sample wells into which chemicals can be dispensed for the identification and susceptibility testing of microorganisms in the diagnosis of infectious disease. Each of the fill channels of the 64 well test card descend to and enter sample wells at an angle, which results in the natural flow of the sample fluid down through the fill channels by gravity, and resistance to small pieces of undissolved material flowing back up into the fluid circuitry. The fluid flow paths are thoroughly dispersed over the card, including both front and rear surfaces, also result in a longer total linear travel of the flowing fluid than conventional cards. The increased well-to-well distance leads to a reduction in the possibility of inter-well contamination. The average well-to-well distance of fluid flow channels on the 64 well card is to approximately 35 mm, significantly more than the 12 mm or so on many older card designs. The 64 well test card is further described, for example, in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,609,828; 5,746,980; 5,869,005; 5,932,177; 5,951,952; and U.S. Pat. No. D 414,272, the contents of which are incorporated herein by reference herein.
As previously discussed, the incubation carousel employed in the Vitek® 2 and Vitek® compact instruments rotates the test cards through a 360° rotation from a normal “upright” card position, through an “inverted” or “upside-down” card position and then back again to an “upright” position. This rotation of the card can lead to leaking of the sample well contents into the fill channels of prior art cards like the 64 well card where the fill channels descend to and enter sample wells at an angle. In the case of the 64 well card, the potential for well-to-well contamination is still mitigated by the large distance between wells. However, this requirement for longer distances between the wells limits the total number of wells that can fit on a test card of standard size.
In the case of identification, the use of 64 reactions wells tends to be sufficient. However, employing only 64 wells in determining antibiotic susceptibility is limiting. Increasing the number of wells in the card would allow improved performance by using more wells for a single antibiotic test as well as increase the number of antibiotics that could be evaluated in a single card. Accordingly, there is a need to increase the total well capacity in a standard test card while maintaining the reduction in the possibility of inter-well contamination. The novel test cards disclosed herein satisfy this goal without requiring significant changes to instruments designed to read each well during incubation.
We disclose herein multiple design concepts for novel sample test cards that provide an increase in the total number of sample wells contained within a test card of standard dimensions. These designs concepts are capable of delaying/preventing chemicals from migrating from one well to another during card filling and incubation, thereby reducing potential contamination between wells.
In one embodiment, a sample test card is provided comprising: (a) a card body defining a first surface and a second surface opposite the first surface, a fluid intake port and a plurality of sample wells disposed between the first and second surfaces, the first and second surfaces sealed with a sealant tape covering the plurality of sample wells; (b) a fluid channel network disposed on the first surface and connecting the fluid intake port to the sample wells, the fluid channel network comprising at least one distribution channel, a plurality of fill channels operatively connected to the at least one distribution channel, and (c) one or more over-flow reservoirs, the over-flow reservoirs being operatively connected to the distribution channel by a fluid over-flow channel. The test card of this embodiment may comprise from 80 to 140 individual sample wells, or from about 96 to about 126 individual sample wells, each of which receives a test sample, for example a biological sample extracted from blood, other fluids, tissue or other material of a patient, for spectroscopic or other automated analysis. In other design variations, the sample test card in accordance with this embodiment may comprise 80, 88, 96, 104, 108, 112, 120, 126, 135 or 140 individual sample wells.
In one embodiment, the present invention is directed to an improved sample test card being about 90 mm in width, about 56 mm in height and about 4 mm thick, having a substantially flat card body with a first surface and a second surface opposite to the first surface, an intake port formed in the card body, a plurality of sample wells formed in the card body, and a fluid flow distribution channel operatively connected to the intake port and traversing a portion of the first surface to distribute a fluid sample from the intake port to the sample wells thereby supplying fluid test samples to the sample wells, wherein the improvement comprises the test card having from about 80 to about 140 total sample wells.
In still another embodiment, a sample test card is provided comprising: (a) a card body defining a first surface and a second surface opposite the first surface, a fluid intake port and a plurality of sample wells disposed between the first and second surfaces, the first and second surfaces sealed with a sealant tape covering the plurality of sample wells; (b) a fluid channel network connecting the fluid intake port to the sample wells, the fluid channel network comprising a single distribution channel disposed on the first surface, the single distribution channel providing a fluid flow path from the fluid intake port to each of the sample wells, and wherein the distribution channel further comprises a plurality of flow reservoirs (e.g., diamond shaped reservoirs) contained within the distribution channel, each of the flow reservoirs having one or more fill channels, wherein the fill channels operatively connect the flow reservoir to the sample wells. In one design configuration, the flow reservoirs are operable as an air trap or air lock to prevent well-to-well contamination. For example, after loading of a test sample into the test sample card, the distribution channel can be filled with air (e.g., by aspirating air into the sample test card via the fluid intake port), and the flow reservoirs can act to trap air, thereby acting as a air barrier, or lock, preventing well-to-well contamination. The test card of this embodiment may further comprise one or more over-flow reservoirs, wherein the over-flow reservoirs are operatively connected to the distribution channel downstream from the sample wells by an over-flow channel. The test card of this embodiment may comprise from 80 to 140 individual sample wells, or from about 96 to about 126 individual sample wells. In other design variations, the sample test card in accordance with this embodiment may comprise 80, 88, 96, 104, 108, 112, 120, 126, 135 or 140 individual sample wells.
In yet another embodiment, the present invention is directed to a method for filling a test sample card with a test sample, the method comprising the following steps of: a) providing a test sample containing or suspected of containing an unknown microorganism; b) providing a sample test card comprising a card body defining a first surface and a second surface opposite the first surface, a fluid intake port and a plurality of sample wells disposed between the first and second surfaces, wherein the first and second surfaces are sealed with a sealant tape covering the plurality of sample wells, a fluid channel network connecting the fluid intake port to the sample wells, the fluid channel network comprising at least one distribution channels and a plurality of fill channels operatively connecting the at least one distribution channel to the sample wells, and one or more over-flow reservoirs operatively connected to the distribution channel by a fluid over-flow channel, and wherein the sample test card comprises from about 80 to about 140 total sample wells; c) filling or loading said test sample into said sample test card via said fluid intake port; wherein said plurality of sample wells are substantially filled with said test sample; and (d) subsequently substantially filling said fluid flow channel network with air or a non-aqueous liquid via said fluid intake port to reduce and/or prevent well-to-well contamination. In accordance with this embodiment, the total volume of the test sample loaded is more than the aggregate or cumulative total volume of all of the sample wells, and less than the total aggregate or cumulative volume of said sample wells, said fluid channel network and said one or more over-flow reservoirs. Furthermore, in accordance with this embodiment, the aspiration of air into the sample test card fills the fluid channel network with air and/or allows any excess fluid to flow into, or be captured by, the over-flow reservoirs.
The various inventive aspects will become more apparent upon reading the following detailed description of the various embodiments along with the appended drawings, in which:
The improved sample test cards of the present invention have a generally rectangular shape and are typically in standard dimensions of from about 90 to about 95 mm in width, from about 55 to about 60 mm in height and from about 4 to about 5 mm in thickness. In one embodiment, the sample test cards of the present invention are about 90 mm wide, about 56 mm high and about 4 mm thick. The test cards of this invention may comprise from 80 to 140 individual sample wells, or from about 96 to about 126 individual sample wells, each of which receives a test sample, for example a biological sample extracted from blood, other fluids, tissue or other material of a patient, for spectroscopic or other automated analysis. In other embodiments, the sample test cards may comprise 80, 88, 96, 104, 108, 112, 120, 126, 135 or 140 individual sample wells. The sample wells are typically arranged in a series of horizontal rows and vertical columns and may comprise from about 8 to about 10 rows of from about 10 to about 16 columns of wells. The biological sample may be a direct sample from the patient, or be a patient sample which is extracted, diluted, suspended, or otherwise treated, in solution or otherwise. The sample test cards of the present invention are generally used in a landscape orientation.
The test cards may be made of polystyrene, PET, or any other suitable plastic or other material. The test cards may be tempered during manufacture with a softening material, so that crystalline rigidity, and resultant tendency to crack or chip, is reduced. Test cards for instance may be manufactured out of a blend of polystyrene, approximately 90% or more, along with an additive of butyl rubber to render the card slightly more flexible and resistant to damage. In some embodiment, the test cards may also be doped with coloring agents, for instance titanium oxide to produce a white color, when desired.
The test cards of the invention may be of use in identifying and/or enumerating any number of microorganisms, such as bacterial and/or other biological agents. Many bacteria lend themselves to automated spectroscopic, fluorescent and similar analysis after incubation, as is known in the art. The transmission and absorption of light is affected by the turbidity, density and colormetric properties of the sample. Fluorescent reactions may be performed as well, independently or along with spectroscopic or other measurements. If fluorescent data are gathered, use of a coloring agent in test cards may be preferred, since an opaque card reduces or eliminates the scattering of fluorescent emissions throughout the card, as can occur with a translucent material. Other types of detection and analysis can be done on the test cards, including testing of susceptibility of microorganisms to antibiotics of different types, and at different concentrations, so that the test cards are general-purpose.
In accordance with the present invention, the sample test card comprises a fluid channel network or a plurality of fluid flow channels (e.g., distribution channels and fill channels) for transport of a fluid test sample from an intake port to each of the individual sample wells. The distribution channels and fill channels (e.g., as schematically illustrated in
Applicants have discovered that the inclusion of one or more over-flow reservoirs on the test card allows the fluid flow path to be drained and/or filled with air, thereby creating an air barrier or air lock that reduces and/or prevents well-to-well contamination. Accordingly, by introducing an air bather between sample wells, the long fluid flow paths between wells, required in previous card designs, can be decreased. The use of a shorter fluid flow path between wells allows for an increased well capacity within a test card having standard dimensions, while maintaining strict inter-well contamination standards. Furthermore, by reducing the well sizes of previous test card designs by approximately one-third, enough additional surface area may be recovered to allow for an even greater increase in well capacity in a test card having standard dimensions.
Furthermore, in accordance with the present invention, the test cards are typically designed to accommodate a specific liquid load volume (i.e., an inoculum or fill volume), while allowing excess volume capacity so that air can be aspirated into the card, thereby filling the fluid flow channels with air and provide an air barrier or air lock between sample wells. This excess volume capacity is provided by the over-flow reservoirs. In one embodiment, as would be appreciated by one of skill in the art, the total volume of the test sample loaded (i.e., the inoculum or fill volume) is more than the aggregate or cumulative total volume of all of the sample wells, and less than the total aggregate or cumulative volume of the sample wells, the fluid channel network and the one or more over-flow reservoirs. In another embodiment, the total volume of the test sample (i.e., inoculum or fill volume) is sufficient to fill all of the sample wells.
In another embodiment, the one or more over-flow reservoirs on the test card may allow the fluid flow path to be drained and filled with a non-aqueous fluid. In general any non-aqueous fluid can be used in the practice of this embodiment. For example, the non-aqueous fluid can be a fluid that would naturally separate from an aqueous fluid into separate and distinct phases, such as, for example, a mineral oil, an olefin (including polyolefins), an ester, an amide, an amine, a siloxane, an organosiloxane, an ether, an acetal, a dialkylcarbonate, or a hydrocarbon. In accordance with this embodiment, the non-aqueous fluid will act to reduce and/or prevent well-to-well contamination by reducing and/or preventing components (e.g., chemicals) contained in the test sample wells (an aqueous fluid) from diffusing, or otherwise leaking, out of the test sample wells due to the non-aqueous nature of the fluid contained in the fluid flow path. Accordingly, by introducing a non-aqueous liquid between sample wells, the long fluid flow paths between wells, required in previous card designs, can be decreased. The use of a shorter fluid flow path between wells allows for an increased well capacity within a test card having standard dimensions, while maintaining strict inter-well contamination standards. Furthermore, in accordance with this embodiment, the test cards are typically designed to accommodate a specific liquid load volume (i.e., an inoculum or fill volume), while allowing excess volume capacity so that a non-aqueous liquid can be filled into the card, thereby filling the fluid flow channels with the non-aqueous liquid and thereby reducing and/or preventing well-to-well contamination between sample wells. This excess volume capacity is provided by the over-flow reservoirs. In one embodiment, as would be appreciated by one of skill in the art, the total volume of the test sample loaded (i.e., the inoculum or fill volume) is more than the aggregate or cumulative total volume of all of the sample wells, and less than the total aggregate or cumulative volume of the sample wells, the fluid channel network and the one or more over-flow reservoirs. In another embodiment, the total volume of the test sample (i.e., inoculum or fill volume) is sufficient to fill all of the sample wells. As is well known in the art, a test sample can be loaded from a tube or container into the test card, for example, by aspiration from the tube or container (see, e.g., U.S. Pat. No. 5,762,873). A non-aqueous fluid can be added to the test sample prior to loading of the test sample into the test card. Due to the nature of the non-aqueous fluid, the aqueous test sample and non-aqueous fluid will naturally separate into separate layers within the tube or container, thereby allowing the aqueous test sample to be loaded from the tube or container into the test card first, and subsequently allowing for the loading of the separated non-aqueous fluid. Hereinbelow, the various embodiments of this invention are described in terms of an air barrier or air lock. However, one of skill in the art would readily appreciate, based on the teachings contained herein, that a non-aqueous liquid can be used (instead of air) to fill the fluid flow channels to create a barrier for reducing and/or preventing well-to-well contamination.
For example, in the illustrated embodiment of
Once the liquid test sample (i.e., inoculum) is loaded, air can be aspirated into the card via the fluid injection tip and intake port to purge and/or empty the fluid flow channels. This aspiration step allows the fluid flow channels to fill with air, thereby creating or providing an air barrier or air lock between the now filled sample wells. Any excess fluid in the fluid flow channels will be emptied into the over-flow reservoirs via the over-flow channel as a result of aspiration. In one embodiment, the aspiration of air into the sample test card fills the fluid channel network (i.e., the fluid flow channels) with air and/or allows any excess fluid to flow into, or be captured by, the over-flow reservoirs. In another embodiment, the total volume of air aspirated into said sample test card is sufficient to fill the fluid channel network (i.e., the fluid flow channels).
In some embodiments, aspiration may result in foaming or bubbling of the test sample as the sample is loaded into the test card. Accordingly, in the practice of the present invention, the use of an anti-foaming agent such as mineral oil may be used to prevent and/or reduce foaming. The anti-foaming agent can be added to the test sample itself prior to loading of the test sample card, or the anti-foaming agent may be included pre-packaged in the test card. Other anti-foaming agents useful in the practice of this invention are well known to those of skill in the art.
After intake of enough air to fill the fluid flow channels and provide an air barrier that prevents well-to-well contamination, a short segment of the sample tip can be pinched off or heat-sealed and left in place in intake port, acting as a sealing plug.
In yet another embodiment, the one or more over-flow reservoirs may contain an absorbent that absorbs excess fluid from the fluid flow channels and thereby helps to empty the fluid flow channels and provide an air barrier. The use of an adsorbent in the over-flow reservoir stimulates or enhances draining and/or adsorption of fluid or liquid from the fluid flow channels, and accordingly, allows the fluid flow channels to be filled with air (e.g., by aspiration). In one embodiment, the use of an adsorbent in the over-flow reservoirs may cause the tape to bulge or otherwise act to “push” the tape out on both sides of the test card.
This bulging or pushing of the tape causes the volume of the adsorbent to increase, thereby further stimulating or enhancing emptying of the fluid flow channels. In yet another embodiment, the adsorbent can be a well known time delay adsorbent, such as, for example, Atofina HP100, or other well known time delay adsorbent. Time delay adsorbents swell after a slight time delay, typically in the presence of a liquid, thereby increasing their adsorption capabilities. Although not wishing to be bound by theory, in the practice of the present invention, it is believed that the use of a time delay adsorbent will allow the wells to fill properly before the time delayed adsorbent adsorbs any remaining liquid in the fluid flow channels. In generally, any known adsorbent can be used. For example, the adsorbent could be an adsorptive resin, a silica gel, a hydrogel, a molecular sieve, zeolite, or other adsorbents well known to those of skill in the art.
One design concept of the invention is illustrated in
Also, as shown in
To receive sample fluid, the test card 2 includes a sample intake plenum or port 18 (see
As is well known in the art, intake port 18 receives a fluid injection tip and related assembly (schematically illustrated as 20), through which the sample fluid or other solution which arrives to dissolve the biological reagents in each sample well 4 is injected, under a vacuum pulled on test card 2 (typically 0.7-0.9 PSIA), then released to atmospheric pressure. Injection port 18 includes a small intake reservoir 22 formed as a roughly rectangular hole through the test card 2, which receives incoming fluid, and acts as a fluid buffer. When the sample is injected into the card, a short segment of the sample tip can be pinched off or heat-sealed and left in place in intake port 18, acting as a sealing plug. After the test fluid (patient sample or other solution) enters the intake port 18 the fluid flows through a fluid flow path comprising a series of fluid flow channels (e.g., distribution channels and/or fill channels) for transport of a fluid test sample from the intake port 18 to each of the individual sample wells 4, as described in more detail hereinbelow.
As the test fluid (i.e., patient sample or other solution) enters intake port (not shown) it collects in intake reservoir 22 and travels along a single distribution channel 30 that leads away from the intake reservoir 22. The distribution channel 30 comprises a relatively long channel, which weaves across the front surface 6 of the test card 2 among a plurality of columns of sample wells 4. In the illustrated embodiment of
As shown, the distribution channel 30 extends first vertical down the front surface 6 of the test card 4 (or descending) away from (i.e., descending branch 32) the intake reservoir 22 and between a first set of two columns, each column comprising eight sample wells 4. At the bottom of the first set of two columns, the distribution channel 30 comprises a traversing branch 34, which transverses in a horizontal manner across the surface of the card to the bottom of a second set of two columns. The distribution channel 30 then extends vertically up (or ascends) the front surface 6 of the test card 2 (i.e., ascending branch 33) between the second set of two columns. At the top of the second set of two columns, the distribution channel 30 comprises a traversing branch 34, which traverses in a horizontal manner across the surface of the card to the top of a third set of two columns and then extends vertically down or descends down (i.e., descending branch 32) between the third set of two columns. This pattern of alternating descending 32 and ascending 33 branches of the distribution channel, interconnected with traversing channel branches 34, continues across the front surface 6 of the test card 2, thereby allowing the distribution channel 30 to weave between all the vertically arranged columns of sample wells on the test card 2. In the illustrated embodiment of
In accordance with this design configuration, the distribution channel 30 further includes a series of flow reservoirs (e.g., diamond shaped reservoirs) 36 at intervals along its length. The diamond shaped reservoirs 36 are generally located between columns of wells and may be slightly elevated above the sample wells 4. As shown in
Accordingly, the illustrated test card 2 (see
Also, as shown in
For mechanical interaction with the automated reading machine, test card 2 may also be provided with a series of sensor stop holes 60, located along the uppermost edge of the card. Sensor stop holes 60, illustrated as regularly spaced, rectangular through-holes, permit associated photodetectors to detect when a test card 2 mounted in a reading machine has come into proper alignment for optical reading. In prior art cards, the sensor stop holes were arranged in vertical register with the vertical columns of wells, so that the optical detection of the stop hole corresponds exactly to positioning of the sample wells before optical reading devices. However, it has now been discovered that this precise alignment of the sensor stop holes with the leading edge of the sample wells can lead to the front edge of the well not being read as a result of a slight delay in the stopping of the card once the sensor stop holes are detected, and thus, a slight misalignment for optical reading. Accordingly, in the present embodiment, the sensor stop holes 60 are arranged in a vertical alignment slightly ahead of the vertical column of wells 4, so that one optical detection of the stop holes 60 occurs and optical reading of the test card 2 initiated, the reading will start at the front edge of the sample well 3. In accordance with this embodiment, the sensor stop holes 60 may be aligned from about 0.25 to about 2 mm ahead (i.e., closer to the first or leading edge of the test card 2) of the vertical wells 4. Moreover, aligning the sensor stop holes slightly ahead of the leading edge of the sample well enables the use of smaller sample wells since the full width of the well can be read by the optical reading machine.
Another advantage of test card 2 of the illustrated design is that patient sample and other markings are not introduced directly on the card itself, in pre-formed segments, as for example shown for example in U.S. Pat. No. 4,116,775 and others. Those on-card stipplings and markings can contribute to debris, mishandling and other problems. In the invention, instead, the card 2 may be provided with bar-coding or other data markings (not shown) by adhesive media, but markings or pre-formed information segments are not necessary (though some could be imprinted if desired) and debris, mishandling, loss of surface area and other problems can be avoided.
Test card 2 furthermore includes, at the lower left corner of the card as illustrated in
Test card 2 also includes a lower rail 80 and an upper rail 82, which are slight structural “bulges” at along the top and bottom areas of the card to reinforce the strength and enhance handling and loading of the test card 2. The extra width of lower and upper rails 80 and 82 also exceeds the thickness of sealing material, such as adhesive tape, that is affixed to the front 6 and rear 8 surfaces of test card 2 for sealing during manufacture and impregnation with reagents. The raised rails therefore protect that tape, especially edges from peeling, during the making of the test card 2, as well as during handling of the card, including during reading operations.
As is well known in the art, upper rail 82 may have serrations (not shown) formed along its top edge, to provide greater friction when test card 2 is transported in card reading machines or otherwise using belt drive mechanisms. Also, as well known in the art, lower card rail 80 may also have formed in it reduction cavities (not shown), which are small elongated depressions which reduce the material, weight and expense of the card by carving out space where extra material is not necessary in the reinforcing rail 80.
In terms of sealing of test card 2 to contain reagents and other material, it has been noted that sealing tapes are typically used to seal flush against test card 2 from either side, with rail protection. Test card 2 may also includes a leading lip 84 on lower card rail 80, and on upper card rail 82. Conversely, at the opposite end of the test card 2 there may also be a trailing truncation 86 in both rails. This structure permits sealing tape to be applied in the card preparation process in a continuous manner, with card after card having tape applied, then the tape cut between successive cards without the tape from successive cards getting stuck together. The leading lip 84 and trailing truncation 86 provides a clearance to separate cards and their applied tape, which may be cut at the trailing truncation 86 and wrapped back around the card edge, for increased security against interference between abutting cards. Thus, the trailing truncation or slanted ramp feature 86 ends slightly inward from the extreme edge of the ends of the card, as shown in
Another design concept of the present invention is illustrated in
As with the illustrated test card design shown in
As shown in
As previously described hereinabove, the inclusion of one or more over-flow reservoirs on the test card allows the fluid flow path to be drained and/or filled with air, thereby creating an air barrier or air lock that reduces and/or prevents well-to-well contamination. Accordingly, by introducing an air barrier between sample wells, the long fluid flow paths between wells, required in previous card designs, can be decreased. The use of a shorter fluid flow path between wells allows for an increased well capacity within a test card having standard dimensions, while maintaining strict inter-well contamination standards. Furthermore, by reducing the well sizes of previous test card designs by approximately one-third, enough additional surface area is recovered to allow for an even greater increase in well capacity in a test card having standard dimensions.
Referring again to
First distribution channel 130 is tapped at intervals along its length by a series or plurality of second distribution channels 132, which generally descend from the first distribution channel 130 between columns of sample wells 104. As shown, for example in
As shown in
Accordingly, the illustrated test card 102 (see
As described above in relation to the first design concept (see
Yet another design concept of the present invention is illustrated in
As with the illustrated test card design shown in
As shown in
As previously described hereinabove, the inclusion of one or more over-flow reservoirs on the test card allows the fluid flow path to be drained and/or filled with air, thereby creating an air barrier or air lock that reduces and/or prevents well-to-well contamination. Accordingly, by introducing an air barrier between sample wells, the long fluid flow paths between wells, required in previous card designs, can be decreased. The use of a shorter fluid flow path between wells allows for an increased well capacity within a test card having standard dimensions, while maintaining strict inter-well contamination standards. Furthermore, by reducing the well sizes of previous test card designs by approximately one-third, enough additional surface area is recovered to allow for an even greater increase in well capacity in a test card having standard dimensions.
Referring again to
As shown in
Accordingly, the illustrated test card 202 (see
As described above in relation to the first design concept (see
The foregoing description of the improved test cards of the invention is illustrative, and variations on certain aspects of the inventive system will occur to persons skilled in the art. The scope of the invention is accordingly intended to be limited only by the following claims.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/391,236, entitled, “Improved Sample Test Cards”, filed Oct. 8, 2010, which is incorporated herein.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3957583 | Gibson et al. | May 1976 | A |
3963355 | Aldridge et al. | Jun 1976 | A |
D243542 | Fadler et al. | Mar 1977 | S |
D243543 | Fadler et al. | Mar 1977 | S |
4038151 | Fadler et al. | Jul 1977 | A |
4116775 | Charles et al. | Sep 1978 | A |
4118280 | Charles et al. | Oct 1978 | A |
D254687 | Fadler et al. | Apr 1980 | S |
4318994 | Meyer et al. | Mar 1982 | A |
4806316 | Johnson et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
5340747 | Eden | Aug 1994 | A |
5374395 | Robinson et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5609828 | O'Bear et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
D382647 | Staples et al. | Aug 1997 | S |
5746980 | O'Bear et al. | May 1998 | A |
5762873 | Fanning et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5766553 | Staples et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5856193 | Fanning et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5869005 | O'Bear et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5888455 | Seaton et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5891396 | Karl et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5932177 | O'Bear et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
D414272 | O'Bear et al. | Sep 1999 | S |
5951952 | O'Bear et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5965090 | Fanning et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
6024921 | Freiner et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6045758 | Staples et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6086824 | Fanning et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6136270 | Maes et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6156565 | Maes et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6485690 | Pfost et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
7601300 | Blanton et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
D689780 | O'Bear et al. | Sep 2013 | S |
D689781 | O'Bear et al. | Sep 2013 | S |
D689782 | O'Bear et al. | Sep 2013 | S |
D690216 | O'Bear et al. | Sep 2013 | S |
D714172 | O'Bear et al. | Sep 2014 | S |
20030180191 | Suzuki et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20040206408 | Peters et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20050048597 | Smith et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20070014695 | Yue et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20080257754 | Pugia et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20120141325 | O'Bear et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
722698 | Aug 2000 | AU |
WO 2009121037 | Oct 2009 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US11/61893 dated Mar. 29, 2012. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US11/55078 dated Apr. 27, 2012. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120088263 A1 | Apr 2012 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61391236 | Oct 2010 | US |