The present disclosure relates generally to sample tube holders and, more particularly, to sample tube racks having retention bars to retain sample tubes in the racks during processing of the contents of the sample tubes.
Automated processing of biological samples typically involves the use of sample tube racks that are adapted to hold a relatively large number of sample tubes for processing within a sample preparation or test instrument. Generally, these sample tube racks are configured to enable the sample preparation or test instrument to hold and/or convey the rack, as well as any sample tubes disposed in the rack, throughout the preparation and/or testing process(es).
Sample tubes containing biological sample material are often sealed with a cap to minimize or prevent the possibility of contamination of the samples, other nearby samples and/or exposing instrument operators processing the samples to the biological material in the samples. However, with many known automated sample processing instruments, such sample tube caps must be removed from each sample tube prior to loading a rack of such tubes in the instruments. Of course, removing the caps can result in contamination of samples and/or exposure of instrument operators to the biological material in the samples.
To eliminate the problems associated with having to remove sample tubes caps prior to processing the sample tubes, some automated sample processing instruments are configured to work with sample tubes having penetrable or pierceable caps. In these instruments, disposable pipettes may be used to pierce the sample tube caps, thereby reducing the possibility of sample contamination and/or operator exposure to biological material. While such automated instruments can eliminate significant amounts of mechanical manipulation of the samples and offer a significant improvement in contamination or exposure issues, proper retention of the sample tubes in the rack becomes an important consideration because withdrawal of the pipettes from the pierceable caps may tend to lift the sample tubes out of the rack due to the frictional forces between the caps and the pipettes.
Further, the use of pierceable caps on sample tubes can also result in pressure differentials between the contents of the sample tube and the ambient in which the caps are pierced. For example, if a sample is collected and capped at a relatively low altitude location and subsequently processed (i.e., the cap is pierced) at a higher altitude location, fluid and/or aerosols containing biological material may be expelled out the pierced opening in the cap, thereby potentially contaminating other samples and/or exposing instrument operators to the biological material.
The example sample tube racks described herein may be used to hold a plurality of sample tubes during automated processing of the contents of the sample tubes. The example sample tube racks advantageously employ a cover or retention bar that is configured to hold the sample tubes in a base, a sample tube holder, or a sample tube carrier during automated processing. More specifically, while the example sample tube racks described herein can be used to process sample tubes without caps, when penetrable sample tube caps are used, the retention bar prevents pipettes or the like that have pierced the caps from lifting these capped sample tubes out of the sample tube holder or carrier as the pipettes are withdrawn from the sample tubes and caps. Also, it should be recognized that while various example sample tube racks described herein may be depicted as configured to hold a particular number of sample tubes (e.g., sixteen), the teachings of the examples herein can be readily applied to sample tube racks configured to hold more or fewer sample tubes as needed to suit a particular application.
Example retention bars described herein may advantageously employ one or more features to substantially reduce or prevent contamination of samples and/or exposure of instrument operators to biological material. For example, the retention bar may be pivotally engaged to the sample tube holder to minimize or eliminate any sliding of the retention bar relative to the sample tube holder and, therefore, the tops of the sample tubes loaded in the sample tube holder. By minimizing or eliminating such sliding of the retention bar relative to the sample tube holder, the transfer of biological material from the top of one sample tube to another is substantially reduced or eliminated.
Additionally or alternatively, the example retention bars described herein may include lateral walls that form flanges to flank at least a top portion of each sample tube. These flanges can operate to control, reduce or prevent the spread of any fluids and/or aerosols, which may contain biological material(s), to other sample tubes and, more generally, within an automated processing instrument. Further, the example retention bars include openings configured to permit the passage of a pipette therethrough and into respective sample tubes positioned opposite the openings. However, these openings are sized to prevent the sample tubes from being pulled through the retention bar when pipettes that have pierced capped tubes are withdrawn from the capped tubes. To further minimize or prevent sample contamination and/or operator exposure, the openings in the retention bars may have at least two aperture sizes or cross-sectional areas. Specifically, one aperture size adjacent to a top surface of the retention bar may be sufficiently large to enable a pipette to pass through the opening, while another aperture size adjacent a bottom surface of the retention bar (and, thus, adjacent the top of a sample tube) may be relatively larger to cover or overlie a substantial portion, if not all, of a pierceable surface of a sample tube cap. In this manner, the openings may have stepped profiles that function to capture fluids or aerosols containing biological material that may escape from the sample tubes when, for example, any caps are pierced. In other words, the aperture adjacent the bottom surface of the retention bar may be made just small enough to allow the bottom surface of the retention bar to contact the periphery of the pierceable cap, preventing the cap from entering the lower aperture area while the aperture adjacent the top is relatively smaller and made just large enough to enable the passage of a pipette, thereby minimizing the aperture area through which any fluid(s) and/or aerosols containing biological material can escape to the top surface of the retention bar and sample tube rack.
Example retention bars described herein may also cooperate with the example sample tube holders described herein to facilitate loading and unloading of sample tubes, identification and tracking of the sample tubes and/or racks being processed, and/or the identification of a potential problem with the manner in which the sample tubes are loaded. For instance, in some examples, a latch or lock mechanism may be provided to lock the retention bar against the sample tube holder. Some of the example latches or lock mechanisms enable one-handed operation to facilitate loading and unloading of the sample tube rack. Further, the latches or lock mechanisms may provide visual indicators that the latch or lock is not properly or fully engaged. For instance, a color or feature may be exposed and readily visible to an operator if the latch or lock is not in a fully locked or secured condition. Similarly, the retention bar orientation or position may alternatively or additionally be used to reveal a condition in which the retention bar is not properly or fully engaged with the sample tube holder. For example, the orientation of the retention bar may be canted or angled relative to the sample tube holder when the retention bar is not fully or properly engaged with the sample tube holder. Additionally or alternatively, top portions of one or more loaded sample tubes may be exposed and visible (i.e., not covered or obscured by the flanges of the retention bar) when the retention bar is not fully or properly engaged with the sample tube holder. These exposed top portions of the sample tubes may readily indicate to an operator of an automated sample processing instrument that the retention bar is not fully or properly engaged with the sample tube holder or base and, therefore, may alert the operator to not initiate processing of the sample tubes by the instrument.
The example sample tube racks described herein may also provide identification structures to facilitate the identification of the sample tube racks and/or the sample tubes contained therein. For example, in some examples, the retention bar of a sample tube rack may include a structure to receive a tag that includes indicia identifying the sample tube rack. Such indicia or identifying information may be used, for example, by an automated sample processing instrument to detect the presence of a sample tube rack and, in some cases, whether the sample tube rack is properly loaded and ready for processing. In other words, the automated sample processing instrument may recognize the presence of such indentifying indicia as an indication of the presence of a sample tube rack having a retention bar coupled thereto and, thus, infer that the sample tube rack is loaded with sample tubes for processing.
Further, the example sample tube holders or bases described herein may also include openings or apertures to permit viewing of at least a portion of the side(s) or outer surface of each sample tube, thereby enabling manual and/or automatic reading of any indentifying information that may be provided on the sample tubes. For example, such identifying information may correspond to the source of (e.g., a person associated with) the biological sample to be processed.
Now turning in detail to
In the example of
The walls 116 define elongated openings 124, which extend along at least a portion of a length of each of the sample tubes 120 to enable viewing of any indicia or information that may be present on the outer surfaces of the sample tubes 120. Such indicia or information may be used to identify the contents and/or sources of (e.g., persons associated with) the biological samples contained in the sample tubes 120.
As noted above, the elongated retention bar 102 is removably and pivotally coupled to the sample tube holder 104 via the protrusion 106, which may include a hook-shaped feature or undercut area that extends through and engages a surface adjacent the opening 108 of the leg 110. The retention bar 102 further includes openings 126 that are positioned over respective ones of the apertures 118 of the sample tube holder 104. The openings 126 are sized to prevent removal of the sample tubes 120 through the retention bar 102. In other words, during sample processing, with the retention bar 102 properly or fully engaged with or locked to the sample tube holder 104, the sample tubes 120 are prevented from being pulled out of the sample tube holder 104 due to, for example, the frictional force(s) exerted by a pipette on a cap pierced by the pipette as the pipette is withdrawn from the sample tube and cap. The openings 126 may further include chamfers or lead-in surfaces 128 to facilitate or guide the movement of, for example, a pipette into the sample tubes 120.
The retention bar 102 further includes lateral portions or walls 130 and 132 (
At an end 136 of the retention bar 102 opposite the leg 110, the top portion 111 of the retention bar 102 includes an opening 138 to receive a hook 140 of the latch mechanism 114. The opening 138 is sized to enable the body of the hook 140 to pass through the top portion 111 of the retention bar 102 when the latch mechanism 114 is held in an unlocked condition. When the latch mechanism 114 is released and, thus, allowed to springably return to a locked condition, a nose or a contoured edge 142 of the hook 140 extends over a stop surface 144 to hold the retention bar 102 in engagement or a locked condition with the sample tube holder 104 (i.e., to prevent the retention bar 102 from being pivoted away from the sample tube holder 104). As shown, the contoured edge 142 may have a beveled or tapered surface to facilitate a sliding engagement of the hook 140 with the stop surface 144.
To further facilitate alignment between the retention bar 102 and the sample tube holder 104, the retention bar 102 may also include one or more alignment notches 146 along a bottom edge 148 of the lateral portions 130 and 132. Such alignment notches 146 may engage with one or more respective complementary protrusions 150 on the sample tube holder 104. In this manner, the cooperation between the alignment notches 146 and the protrusions 150 maintains alignment of the openings 126 relative to the apertures 118 when the retention bar 102 is fully engaged and/or locked against the sample tube holder 104. In other words, these alignment notches 146 and the protrusions 150 function to align the relative positions of the retention bar 102 and the sample tube holder 104 along a longitudinal axis 152 of the sample tube rack 100. Likewise, the leg 110 includes an inner surface 154 that engages an outer surface 156 of one of the walls 116 at an end of the sample tube rack 100 to align the position of the retention bar 102 along the longitudinal axis 152 of the sample tube rack 100.
To control the lateral alignment (i.e., perpendicular to the longitudinal axis 152) of the retention bar 102 relative to the sample tube holder 104, inner surfaces 158 of the lateral portions 130 and 132 of the retention bar 102 may engage, or at least are constrained by, surfaces 160 of the sample tube holder 104 adjacent the lock mechanism 114. Similarly, the leg 110 includes lateral walls 162, which extend toward the lock mechanism 114, that engage sides or edges 164 of the wall 116 at the end of the sample tube rack 100. These lateral walls 162 limit the lateral movement of the retention bar 102 relative to the sample tube holder 104.
The latch mechanism 114 includes an actuator 166, which includes a button 168 that is coupled via a slide 170 to the hook 140. The actuator 166 slidably engages the sample tube holder 104 via a slot, channel or groove 172 and is springably biased toward a locked condition by a biasing element 174 (e.g., a spring). A plug 176, which is fixed to the sample tube holder 104 by a screw 178 that passes through an aperture 180 and into the plug 176, captures the actuator 166 in the slot 172. A finger grip 182 may be provided as shown to facilitate one-handed operation of the latch mechanism 114. For example, an operator may wrap the forefinger of one hand around the grip 182 while using their thumb of the same hand to push the button 168 against the biasing element 174 toward the unlocked condition (i.e., toward the leg 110). Although not shown, the channel or groove 172 may include one or more weep or drain holes to permit any liquid that may enter the channel or groove 172 (e.g., during cleaning of the sample tube rack 100) to pass through the rack 100.
In the example of
Returning to
The various components of the example sample tube rack 100 may be made of identical, similar and/or different materials to suit the needs of particular applications. In some examples, the retention bar 102 and the sample tube holder 104 are made of plastic while the guide rail 112 is made of metal. Such a material selection provides a rugged rail, which can be replaced as needed due to wear or changed to enable adaptation of the sample tube rack 100 to different processing instruments. Further, the use of lighter, plastic materials for the retention bar 102 and the sample tube holder 104 while metal is used for the guide rail 112 provides a relatively lower center of mass and, thus, increased stability of the rack 100, particularly when the rack 100 is loaded with the sample tubes 120. However, in other applications, the guide rail 112 may be made of plastic rather than metal. Further, the various components (e.g., a surface of the sample tube holder 104) may be flame treated to facilitate adhesion of a label to the component.
In the example of
Walls 916 of the sample tube holder 900 may include posts 918-924 that are configured to receive o-rings (not shown), for example, to facilitate stabilization of any sample tubes loaded in the rack 900. Such o-rings may be selected to frictionally engage outer surfaces of sample tubes to limit or prevent movement of the sample tubes once loaded in the sample tube rack 900.
In
The retention bar 1108 may be vertically coupled or locked to the sample tube holder 1104 via buckle structures 1110 and 1112, which are located at opposite ends of the sample tube rack 1100. As can be most clearly seen in
The latch mechanism 1402 includes a buckle lever 1417 and a loop or hasp 1418 that engages and pulls downwardly on a lip 1420 of the retention bar 1406 to the lock the retention bar to the rack 1400. At the end of the rack 1400 opposite the latch 1402, the retention bar 1406 includes a slot 1422 to receive a hooked end 1424 of the end plate 1414.
The one-piece configuration shown in
Although certain methods and apparatus have been described herein, the scope of coverage of this patent is not limited thereto. To the contrary, this patent covers all methods and apparatus fairly falling within the scope of the appended claims either literally or under the doctrine of equivalents.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
143417 | Munroe | Oct 1873 | A |
418940 | Bray | Jan 1890 | A |
1168535 | Moltrum | Jan 1916 | A |
1634953 | McCune et al. | Jul 1927 | A |
D110691 | Dudley | Aug 1938 | S |
2467873 | Weir | Apr 1949 | A |
2708037 | Planeta | May 1955 | A |
2741913 | Dovas | Apr 1956 | A |
2902170 | Miller | Sep 1959 | A |
2956686 | Garey | Oct 1960 | A |
2979210 | Patterson | Apr 1961 | A |
3072362 | Allen | Jan 1963 | A |
3109084 | Walsh | Oct 1963 | A |
3115247 | Hauser | Dec 1963 | A |
3142385 | Kahlenberg | Jul 1964 | A |
3175695 | Goodman et al. | Mar 1965 | A |
3186556 | Forsstrom | Jun 1965 | A |
3375934 | Bates | Apr 1968 | A |
3474913 | Jungner et al. | Oct 1969 | A |
D216491 | Brown | Jan 1970 | S |
3605829 | Genese et al. | Sep 1971 | A |
3643812 | Mander et al. | Feb 1972 | A |
3680967 | Engelhardt | Aug 1972 | A |
3698563 | Gordon et al. | Oct 1972 | A |
3744661 | Fischer, Jr. | Jul 1973 | A |
3752651 | Bush | Aug 1973 | A |
3765538 | Kowert | Oct 1973 | A |
3785773 | Rohrbaugh | Jan 1974 | A |
RE28165 | McCormick | Sep 1974 | E |
3882619 | Durand et al. | May 1975 | A |
3904035 | Metzler et al. | Sep 1975 | A |
3905482 | Knulst | Sep 1975 | A |
3905772 | Hartnett et al. | Sep 1975 | A |
3909203 | Young et al. | Sep 1975 | A |
3960271 | Nelson | Jun 1976 | A |
4036391 | Prodel | Jul 1977 | A |
4037464 | Wenander | Jul 1977 | A |
4043762 | Olds | Aug 1977 | A |
4055396 | Meyer et al. | Oct 1977 | A |
4124122 | Emmitt | Nov 1978 | A |
4160803 | Potts | Jul 1979 | A |
4202634 | Kraft et al. | May 1980 | A |
4207289 | Weiss | Jun 1980 | A |
4265855 | Mandle et al. | May 1981 | A |
4284603 | Korom | Aug 1981 | A |
4287155 | Tersteeg et al. | Sep 1981 | A |
4322216 | Lillig et al. | Mar 1982 | A |
D265126 | Beall | Jun 1982 | S |
4391780 | Boris | Jul 1983 | A |
4407943 | Cole et al. | Oct 1983 | A |
4422555 | Jacobs | Dec 1983 | A |
4434890 | Sieck et al. | Mar 1984 | A |
4438068 | Forrest | Mar 1984 | A |
4495150 | Cook et al. | Jan 1985 | A |
4510119 | Hevey | Apr 1985 | A |
4522089 | Alvi | Jun 1985 | A |
D280130 | Harkins et al. | Aug 1985 | S |
4534465 | Rothermel et al. | Aug 1985 | A |
D286912 | Andersen | Nov 1986 | S |
4639135 | Borer et al. | Jan 1987 | A |
D290401 | Bjorkman | Jun 1987 | S |
4751052 | Schwartz et al. | Jun 1988 | A |
4761268 | Andersen et al. | Aug 1988 | A |
4787523 | Kalous | Nov 1988 | A |
4805772 | Shaw et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
4824641 | Williams | Apr 1989 | A |
4849177 | Jordan | Jul 1989 | A |
4895650 | Wang | Jan 1990 | A |
4907893 | Niemeck et al. | Mar 1990 | A |
4932533 | Collier | Jun 1990 | A |
4933147 | Hollar et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
4948564 | Root et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
4963493 | Daftsios | Oct 1990 | A |
4982850 | Mears | Jan 1991 | A |
5004103 | Connors et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5006066 | Rouse | Apr 1991 | A |
5029699 | Insley et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5057282 | Linder | Oct 1991 | A |
5077013 | Guigan | Dec 1991 | A |
5080232 | Leoncavallo et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
5082631 | Lenmark, Sr. et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
5098663 | Berthold et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5108287 | Yee et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
5127541 | Wakatake | Jul 1992 | A |
5128105 | Berthold et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5133939 | Mahe | Jul 1992 | A |
5137693 | Mawhirt | Aug 1992 | A |
5169603 | Landsberger | Dec 1992 | A |
5173265 | Golias et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
D333522 | Gianino | Feb 1993 | S |
5186339 | Heissler | Feb 1993 | A |
5191975 | Pezzoli et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
D336219 | Held | Jun 1993 | S |
5217694 | Gibler et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5232669 | Pardinas | Aug 1993 | A |
5318753 | Honda | Jun 1994 | A |
5322668 | Tomasso | Jun 1994 | A |
5324481 | Dunn et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5350564 | Mazza et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5378433 | Duckett et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5456360 | Griffin | Oct 1995 | A |
5456882 | Covain | Oct 1995 | A |
5472669 | Miki et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5517867 | Ely et al. | May 1996 | A |
5533700 | Porter | Jul 1996 | A |
5571481 | Powell et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5576504 | Evers | Nov 1996 | A |
5579928 | Anukwuem | Dec 1996 | A |
5632388 | Morrison et al. | May 1997 | A |
5642816 | Kelly et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5650125 | Bosanquet | Jul 1997 | A |
5651941 | Stark et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5687849 | Borenstein et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5700429 | Buhler et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5704495 | Bale et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5753186 | Hanley et al. | May 1998 | A |
5777303 | Berney | Jul 1998 | A |
D405192 | Smith et al. | Feb 1999 | S |
5897090 | Smith et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5916527 | Haswell | Jun 1999 | A |
5931318 | Shauo | Aug 1999 | A |
D413677 | Dumitrescu et al. | Sep 1999 | S |
D414273 | Smith et al. | Sep 1999 | S |
5951524 | Enriquez | Sep 1999 | A |
5959221 | Boyd et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
D417009 | Boyd | Nov 1999 | S |
5985219 | Lind | Nov 1999 | A |
5993745 | Laska | Nov 1999 | A |
5996818 | Boje et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6015534 | Atwood | Jan 2000 | A |
D420747 | Dumitrescu et al. | Feb 2000 | S |
D421130 | Cohen et al. | Feb 2000 | S |
6027691 | Watts et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6063341 | Fassbind et al. | May 2000 | A |
6065617 | Cohen et al. | May 2000 | A |
6123205 | Dumitrescu et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
D433759 | Mathis et al. | Nov 2000 | S |
6156275 | Dumitrescu et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6193064 | Finneran | Feb 2001 | B1 |
D439673 | Brophy et al. | Mar 2001 | S |
6221317 | Carl | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6235245 | Sherman et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
H1960 | Conrad et al. | Jun 2001 | H |
6251686 | Studer et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6274092 | Itoh | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6335166 | Ammann et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6618981 | Rodriguez | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6875405 | Mathus et al. | Apr 2005 | B1 |
7132082 | Aviles et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7276208 | Sevigny et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7294308 | Kacian et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7611675 | Sevigny et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
20020021983 | Comte et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020108917 | Maruyama | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20030017084 | Dale et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030215364 | Aviles et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20050281716 | Belz et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20070034592 | Pavlovic et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070054413 | Aviles et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20080031776 | Sevigny et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080075634 | Herchenbach et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20100288056 | Clark et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100288061 | Hagen | Nov 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1021962 | Dec 1977 | CA |
2035916 | Aug 1991 | CA |
0100663 | Feb 1984 | EP |
0142704 | May 1985 | EP |
0965385 | Dec 1999 | EP |
1614476 | Jan 2006 | EP |
1507594 | Aug 2006 | EP |
1507593 | Oct 2007 | EP |
1161164 | Jun 1989 | JP |
07181188 | Jul 1995 | JP |
09138235 | May 1997 | JP |
2006053129 | Feb 2006 | JP |
2008537147 | Sep 2008 | JP |
9301739 | Feb 1993 | WO |
0147640 | Jul 2001 | WO |
03097240 | Nov 2003 | WO |
2006113854 | Oct 2006 | WO |
2010132887 | Nov 2010 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Searching Authority, “Invitation to Pay Additional Fees and Partial Search Report,” issued in connection with international application serial No. PCT/US2011/049815, mailed Jan. 26, 2012, 8 pages. |
International Preliminary Examining Authority, “Written Opinion of the International Preliminary Examining Authority,” issued in connection with international application serial No. PCT/US2011/049815, mailed Oct. 12, 2012, 8 pages. |
International Searching Authority, “International Search Report,” issued in connection with international application serial No. PCT/US2011/049815, mailed Apr. 18, 2012, 11 pages. |
International Searching Authority, “Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority,” issued in connection with international application serial No. PCT/US2011/049815, mailed Apr. 18, 2012, 12 pages. |
BD, “BD Viper System with XTR Technology,” Brochure, published Jan. 2009, 8 pages. |
Tecan Group Ltd., “Liquid Handling Robotics,” © 2010, last retrieved from http://www.tecan.com/page/content/index.asp?MenuID=1&ID=2&Menu=1&Item=21.1 , Nov. 17, 2010, 1 page. |
Tecan Group Ltd., “Freedom EVO Clinical,” © 2010, last retrieved from http://www.tecan.com/platform/apps/product/index.asp?MenuID=1328&ID=829&Menu=1&Item=21,1.3 , Nov. 17, 2010, 1 page. |
Konnis, “Tecan Freedom EVO Systems for Sale,” © 2009, last retrieved from http://www.konnis.com/LHFreedomEVO.html, Nov. 17, 2010, 2 pages. |
“Automated Sample Preparation for Bluetongue Testing,” Labnews.co.uk, last retrieved from http://www.labnews.co.uk/feature—archive.php/2547/5/automated-sample-preparation-for-bluetongue-testing , Nov. 17, 2010, 3 pages. |
BD, “BD Viper with XTR Technology,” Product Center, © 2010, last retrieved from http://www.bd.com/ds/productCenter/MD-Viper.asp, Nov. 17, 2010, 2 pages. |
International Bureau, “International Preliminary Report on Patentability,” issued in connection with international application serial No. PCT/US2011/049815, mailed Dec. 19, 2012, 44 pages. |
IP Australia, “Patent Examination Report No. 1,” issued in connection with Australian Patent Application No. 2011296120, dated Aug. 23, 2013, 4 pages. |
Canadian Intellectual Property Office, “Requisition by Examiner,” issued in connection with Canadian Patent Application No. 2,809,267, dated Jan. 21, 2014, 3 pages. |
Japanese Patent Office, “Notice of Rejection,” issued in connection with Chinese Patent Application No. 2013-527237, mailed on Jan. 21, 2014, 4 pages. |
IP Australia, “Notice of Acceptance,” issued in connection with Australian Patent Application No. 2011296120, dated Aug. 20, 2014, 2 pages. |
Japanese Patent Office, “Final Decision to Allowance,” issued in connection with Japanese Patent Application 2013-527237, mailed on Dec. 22, 2014, 3 pages. |
Japanese Patent Office, “Certificate of Patent No. 5686899,” issued in connection with Japanese Patent Application 2013-527237, issued on Jan. 30, 2015, 2 pages. |
Canadian Intellectual Property Office, “Office Action,” issued in connection with Canadian Patent Application No. 2,809,267, on Feb. 24, 2015, 3 pages. |
Canadian Intellectual Property Office, “Notice of Allowance, ” issued in connection with Canadian Patent Application No. 2,809,267, on Jul. 20, 2015, 1 page. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120051987 A1 | Mar 2012 | US |