This invention relates generally to the field of chromatography, and more particularly for a multiple port valve with an integrated sample shut off function for a gas chromatograph.
A sample shut off valve is a common need in the gas chromatograph. The purpose of the sample shut off valve is to temporarily block the flow of the sample into the sample valve of the gas chromatograph. This allows the volume of vapor in the sample loop attached to the sample valve to equilibrate to atmospheric pressure prior to being injected into the chromatographic column when the sample valve is actuated. This reduces the influence of sample pressure on the quantified analytical results.
An implementation of the sample shut off valve function is to add a separate valve in the chromatograph oven. This valve is connected in series with the sample flow but is upstream of the sample valve. The sample shut off valve is then activated to block the flow for a period of a few seconds. The time is typically chosen to allow adequate time for the sample loop and all associated tubing paths downstream of the sample shutoff valve to equilibrate to atmospheric pressure.
The addition of the separate valve adds product costs due to the material cost of the valve, the labor for additional plumbing, and also consumes space in the gas chromatograph oven compartment.
Some valves available to the industry have an internal means of blocking the sample flow path prior to blocking the rest of the flow path prior to blocking the rest of the flow paths by having the parts situated such that the sample inlet port physically closes first when the valve mechanism is switched (typically a rotary or slider valve). Since the valve mechanism is directly coupled to the rest of the switching mechanism, the sample inlet flow is only blocked for a very short duration (<100 milliseconds). This does not allow adequate time to equilibrate the sample loop volume to atmospheric pressure.
Therefore, there is a significant need for a sample valve with an integrated sample shut off function.
According to one aspect of the invention, there is provided a multiple port valve apparatus for injecting a sample to be analyzed in to a column of a chromatograph that analyzes samples, said multiple port valve incorporating a sample shut off valve function, said multiple port valve apparatus comprising a plurality of ports, at least one of said ports receiving said sample to be analyzed by said chromatograph, a plurality of passages connecting said plurality of ports that transmit said sample between said plurality of ports, and a separately controlled passage that is independently controllable from said plurality of passages that responds to independent control and effects said sample shut off function by controlling an inlet of said sample to said sample loop of said chromatograph.
According to another aspect of the invention, there is provided a method for switching a multiple port valve that transmits a sample to be analyzed to a chromatograph that analyzes said sample valve having an independently switched sample flow passage incorporated therein for effecting a sample shut off function, said method comprising the steps of: inletting a sample to be analyzed into a first port of said multiple port valve, transmitting said sample inlet into said first port to said sample flow passage, and controlling said sample flow passage independently from other passages of said multiple port valve to control a flow of said sample through said sample flow passages to thereby effect said sample shut off valve function.
The present invention will now be described with reference to the accompanying drawings wherein:
The present invention relates to a multiple port valve integrated with the function of the sample shut off valve. While the present invention is applicable to any type of multiple port valve, the Siemens model 50 valve is recommended with the present invention. In comparison to the prior art, the shut off valve function is directly incorporated into the multiple port valve. The present invention reduces the cost of manufacture of such a gas chromatograph by eliminating the material cost of a separate sample shut off valve. Additionally, the labor cost of additional plumbing is eliminated. Additionally, additional oven space is not needed to accommodate the separate shut off valve. Additionally, the present invention provides a shorter equilibration time than with a separate shut off valve since, as will be described further, the present invention utilizes less tubing volume. As a result of this feature, there is less tubing required to equilibrate to atmospheric pressure prior to the sample inject operation of the sample valve.
In more detail, and as shown in the figures, the valve of the present invention is modified from an off-the-shelf valve, such as the Siemens model 50 sample valve. In one embodiment, the present invention is practiced by modifying the Model 50 sample valve by allowing one flow passage in the valve to be separately controlled from the remainder of the valve passages. With this arrangement, the single flow passage may be independently blocked. The valve is allowed to equilibrate and, after a predetermined time required for the pressure equilibration, the remainder of the valve passages, hereinafter referred to as normal valve passages, are switched. Thereby, sample inject operation into the column is effected.
The operation of an integrated sample shut off valve function is illustrated with reference to the figures. Generally, in operation, the multiple port valve incorporating a sample shut off valve function includes the following steps. In brief, a complete cycle typically includes three states of operation for the valves: stopping the sample flow, injecting the sample, and returning the valve to the original state where the sample may flow through the sample loop. Referring to
In a second state of operation the valve is in an “off” state. The sample flow is blocked while actuation pressure is applied to the bottom plate (not shown) and to the sample shut off signal port on the top plate (not shown). Referring to
In a third state, the valve is “on.” The sample is injected into port 11 while the actuation pressure is applied to the top plate (not shown) and to sample shut off signal port on the top plate (not shown). Referring to
The fourth state reverts to the second state. That is, the valve is in an “off” state. Referring back to
The fifth state reverts to the first state. In other words, the valve is in an “off” state wherein the sample flows through the sample loop as shown in the figures, while actuation pressure is applied to the bottom of the plate. Referring back to
Referring to
It will be noted that the above relationship between the ports have been illustrated with respect to a ten port valve. The above relationship is suitable for a Siemens model 50 sample valve available from Siemens. Those of ordinary skill in the art may readily determine the suitable port relationships for a multiport apparatus of six ports or any suitable number of ports.
It will be appreciated that the above described embodiments are illustrative and that those of ordinary skill in the art may readily devise their own implementations that incorporate the principles of the present invention and fall within the spirit and scope thereof.
This application claims priority under 35 U.S.C. §119(e) to U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/275,532, entitled “Integrated Valve and Sample Shut-Off Valve System, Method and Apparatus,” filed Mar. 13, 2001.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3077766 | Reinecke | Feb 1963 | A |
3150517 | Kuffer | Sep 1964 | A |
3223123 | Young | Dec 1965 | A |
3744219 | Stalling | Jul 1973 | A |
4155978 | Naono et al. | May 1979 | A |
4243071 | Shackelford | Jan 1981 | A |
4353243 | Martin | Oct 1982 | A |
4816226 | Jordan et al. | Mar 1989 | A |
5405585 | Coassin | Apr 1995 | A |
5601115 | Broerman | Feb 1997 | A |
6453725 | Dahlgren et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6701774 | Srinivasan et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0481285 | Apr 1992 | EP |
02 07 5994 | Jul 2002 | EP |
WO 98 11431 | Mar 1998 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20020131905 A1 | Sep 2002 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60275532 | Mar 2001 | US |