The present invention relates generally to multiple beam communication systems and more particularly, to a method and apparatus for sampling a received signal that is manipulated by a digital beam former.
Current commercial mobile satellite communication systems having conventional multiple beam architectures, which use multi-beam phased array antennas, incorporate digital beam forming (DBF) techniques. DBF phased array antennas are very useful in forming multiple simultaneous beams covering a large field of view (FOV).
Typical mobile satellite payloads have a DBF phase array antenna. The phase array antenna includes a plurality of receive array elements for receiving communication signals. Each receive array element is connected to several components for signal-conditioning the communication signals prior to connecting to a digital beam forming network. The receive array elements are connected to a plurality of low noise amplifiers (LNAs), by which the received signal is amplified. The LNAs are connected to a plurality of downconverters. The downconverters convert a high frequency received signal to an analog baseband or intermediate frequency (IF) signal. The analog baseband signal is then transformed into a digital signal by an analog-to-digital (A/D) converter.
Additionally to properly select a sideband in frequency downconversion, satellite payloads usually include a plurality of filters, between the plurality of downconverters and the plurality of A/D converters. The filter helps to eliminate undesired signals and noise in frequency ranges outside of a desired frequency band. The undesired signals may cause aliasing, which can cause interference with the desired signal.
Currently the downconverters are used to convert mobile signals at frequency bands below C-band, down to baseband. In the future, as technology progresses, different downconverters and possibly corresponding filters will be needed to convert signals for other applications in higher frequency bands such as the super high frequency band (SHF), KU band, and extremely high frequency (EHF) band. Unfortunately, increasing satellite communication system versatility, ability to downconvert, and filter higher frequency bands with larger bandwidths increases electronic component count, and system complexity, therefore, increasing cost.
In satellite communication systems there is a continuing effort to decrease the amount of components in the system thereby decreasing the size and weight of the system, decreasing hardware, decreasing costs, decreasing power consumption, and increasing efficiency.
In space systems, where up to thousands of receiving array elements may be used, a reduction in satellite payload components may cause tremendous savings. In other terrestrial communication systems, in which many receive array elements are used the savings in cost, weight, and power will also be increased.
Therefore a need exists to reduce the number of components in the mobile satellite payload. Also a need exists to produce a satellite payload for other applications that is capable of converting signals to digital format at carrier frequency.
The forgoing and other advantages are provided by a method and apparatus of sampling a communication signal within a mobile satellite payload. The satellite payload uses a plurality of receive radiating elements within a DBF phase array antenna to convert the communication signals to received signals. The received signals are amplified, by a plurality of low noise amplifiers (LNAs), to a desired level for a plurality of analog-to-digital (A/D) converters. The A/D converters transform the received signals into digital baseband signals.
The present invention has several advantages over existing sampling techniques. One advantage of the present invention is that it eliminates the use of separate downconverters and reduces the number of filters in satellite payloads.
Another advantage of the present invention is that it utilizes the “aliasing” characteristics of the A/D converter capability to downconvert L-Band and S-Band frequencies to baseband.
Therefore, a mobile satellite payload having a minimal number of components, which can convert analog signals in frequency bands up to C-band to digital signals, is possible due to the stated method advantages. The present invention itself, together with further objects and attendant advantages, will be best understood by reference to the following detailed description, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawing.
The present invention may be applied in various applications such as a fixed satellite service communication system, general packet radio service (GPRS), universal mobile telecommunication system (UMTS), or other terrestrial mobile communication applications. The present invention may also be incorporated into communication systems using various payload designs such as a low profile array, a surface mount antenna (SMA), or a digital design.
While the present invention is described with respect to a sampling method for a multiple beam mobile satellite communication system, the following sampling method is capable of being adapted for various purposes and is not limited to the following applications: a ground based base-station, mobile terminal, or any other electronic or communication devices.
In the following description, all signals have a frequency domain and a time domain representation. The present invention may operate in various frequency ranges below C-band. As technology improves the present invention may be applied in frequency ranges above C-band. Also in the following description, various operating parameters and components are described for one constructed embodiment. These specific parameters and components are included as examples and are not meant to be limiting.
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring now to
The receive radiating elements 24 receive communication signals 26, which are detected at the element level to create received signals [S(t)], from a user at a given direction. The received signals [S(t)] have generally equal amplitudes, but different phases at each receive radiating element 24. Each received signal [S(t)] may be decomposed to two components: the carrier signal and the information signal, which modulates the carrier. A typical satellite communication signal may have a carrier signal frequency (fc) equal to approximately 2 GHz. The corresponding information signal frequency may have a bandwidth at approximately 10–20 KHz or less.
Now referring also to
Now referring also to
The A/D converter 32 performs a sampling function and an inherent filtering function in a respective sampler 46 and digital filter 48. The inherent filtering function arises from a finite aperture time that is required. Although the samplers and filters are shown in the following figures as separate conceptual blocks within the A/D converters, the A/D converters may sample and filter simultaneously within the internal circuitry of the A/D converters.
The sampler 46 transforms an analog signal, such as the received communication signal S′(ω), into a sampled signal [S″(ω)]. The replica of the low frequency component 42 appear at the intervals corresponding to the sampling frequency (fs). In order to avoid overlapping of the replica of the low frequency component 42 fs should be at least twice the bandwidth of the low frequency component 42. Therefore, A/D converter 32 quantize and digitize S′(ω) at a frequency equal to twice the bandwidth of the originally received communication signal [S(ω)], in order to create a resulting signal representing all information in the received communication signal. The sampling rate is referred to as the Nyquist rate to one in the art.
As a part of the sampling function, the downconverted received signal S′(t), in the time domain, is multiplied by an infinite pulse train X(t) to form the sampled signal S′(t). X(t), an infinite pulse train, is equal to the convolution () of an impulse train and a square pulse as follows:
X(t)={(fst)
Π(t/α)}
where (fst) is an infinite impulse train with repetition every 1/fs seconds. Π (t/α) is a square pulse with pulse width equal to α seconds. The value of α is equal to the aperture time of the A/D converter 29. Mathematically, the time domain representation of the sampled signal S′(t) is as follows:
S′(t)=S′(t)*{(fst)
Π(t/α)}
The frequency domain representation of S′(t), the spectrum signal S′(ω), is as follows:
S′(ω)=S1′(ω){
(ω/ωs)*sin(α*ω)/α*ω}
where ω=2*π*f and ωs=2*π*fs.
S1′(ω) is the low-passed spectrum of S′(ω) and is represented by low frequency component 42. The first two terms, S1′(ω)(ω/ωs), represent the replica of S′(ω) spaced apart by fs. The third term, sin(α*ω)/α*ω, is a decay function 50 caused by the finite time associated with the aperture time (α).
Now referring to
Now referring to
Now referring again to
Beam channelizers 54 transform the digital signals including amplitude and phase information into digital data streams. The beam channelizers 54 provide the digital stream over to data packet switch elements 56. The data packet switch elements 56 packetize the data streams and the packets are transmitted accordingly over crosslink antennas 58. The crosslink antennas 58 transmit signals to and receive signals from other mobile satellite payloads. The data packet switch elements 56 also provide a data stream representing one individual antenna beam to each beam synthesizer module 60. Beam synthesizer modules 60 convert the data streams to digital output signals that represent the analog waveforms that are transmitted. The beam synthesizer 60 couples the digital output signals to the DBF 52. The DBF 52 determines proper signal weights for each receive radiating element 24 and transmit radiating element 62. The DBF 52 analyzes incoming signals using a suitable algorithm and determines proper signal weights. The weighted analog transmitting signals are converted to a digital signal by a digital-to-analog (D/A) converter 64. The D/A converter 64 transforms the digital output signals for each receive radiating element 24 into corresponding analog signals for each transmit radiating element 62. The D/A converter 64 transfers the analog signals to a plurality of transmitter modules 66. The transmitter modules 66 have two components, an upconverter 68, and an amplifier 70. The analog signals are converted, via the upconverter 68 and the amplifier 70, into suitable signals for transmission to the earth station terminals 16.
The present invention eliminates the use of the separate downconverter 30 and filter 31 for the mobile satellite payload 18. The traditional A/D converter 32 is replaced with an A/D converter of the present invention 29. The A/D converter 29, by maintaining its aperture time accuracy and properly predetermining its sampling rate is capable of directly converting analog signals at carrier frequency to digital baseband level signals.
The faster the A/D converter 29 the shorter the aperture time (α). However the reverse shall not be true. Although α is shortened to allow energy to be charged during a small fraction of the carrier frequency cycle, the sampling rate is still determined by the Nyquist rate to avoid spectrum overlapping. The relationship between α and fs is:
1/(A*fs)
where A is a constant and depends on the particular A/D converter.
Now referring to
Now referring to
Now referring to
In step 100, as described above, the received communication signals 26 are received by the plurality of receive radiating elements 24 and converted to received signals [S″(ω)].
In step 102, the received signals [S″(ω)] are amplified by the LNAs 28.
In step 104, the received signals [S″(ω)] are digitized through the A/D converters 29. The A/D converters 29 directly sample the received signals [S″(ω)] and then quantize and convert the sampled signals S′″(ω) into digital formats.
The aperture time of the present invention is a fraction of the period of fc and fs is at least twice the signal bandwidth of S″(ω), where fc is the carrier frequency and fs is the sampling frequency. Therefore, from the above mentioned, direct sampling of communication signals having a fc up to 5 GHz, without a separate downconverter, while maintaining sampling rates at approximately 100M samples per sec is possible.
The above-described invention, by eliminating the downconverter reduces the number of mobile satellite payload components. The reduction of the number of mobile satellite payload components may reduce weight, costs, and hardware of the mobile satellite payload. The present invention also provides a method for digitizing signals at frequency bands up to C-band without using a separate downconverter.
The above-described sampling method, to one skilled in the art, is capable of being adapted for various purposes and is not limited to the following applications: a ground based mobile terminal, base stations, or any other terrestrial electronic or communication devices that receive or transmit signals. The above-described invention may also be varied without deviating from the true scope of the invention.
The present application claims priority to provisional application Ser. No. 60/266,813 filed on Feb. 5, 2001, the entire contents of which are incorporated herein by this reference.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2470787 | Nosker | May 1949 | A |
| 3384891 | Anderson | May 1968 | A |
| 3541553 | Gubin | Nov 1970 | A |
| 3544995 | Bottenberg et al. | Dec 1970 | A |
| 3673606 | Maune | Jun 1972 | A |
| 3720953 | Ajioka | Mar 1973 | A |
| 4161730 | Anderson | Jul 1979 | A |
| 4161734 | Anderson | Jul 1979 | A |
| 4359733 | O'Neill | Nov 1982 | A |
| 4613864 | Hofgen | Sep 1986 | A |
| 4635063 | Chang et al. | Jan 1987 | A |
| 4819227 | Rosen | Apr 1989 | A |
| 4897661 | Hiraiwa | Jan 1990 | A |
| 4926186 | Kelly | May 1990 | A |
| 4979170 | Gilhousen et al. | Dec 1990 | A |
| 4994809 | Yung et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
| 5006855 | Braff | Apr 1991 | A |
| 5017927 | Agrawal et al. | May 1991 | A |
| 5077562 | Chang et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
| 5099245 | Sagey | Mar 1992 | A |
| 5111209 | Toriyama | May 1992 | A |
| 5126748 | Ames et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
| 5151706 | Roederer et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
| 5218619 | Dent | Jun 1993 | A |
| 5233626 | Ames | Aug 1993 | A |
| 5278863 | Briskman | Jan 1994 | A |
| 5319673 | Briskman | Jun 1994 | A |
| 5387916 | Cohn | Feb 1995 | A |
| 5410314 | Frush et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
| 5444450 | Olds et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
| 5485485 | Briskman et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
| 5523726 | Kroeger et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
| 5525995 | Benner | Jun 1996 | A |
| 5550809 | Bottomley et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
| 5555257 | Dent | Sep 1996 | A |
| 5572216 | Weinberg et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
| 5589834 | Weinberg | Dec 1996 | A |
| 5592471 | Briskman | Jan 1997 | A |
| 5594941 | Dent | Jan 1997 | A |
| 5612701 | Diekelman | Mar 1997 | A |
| 5644572 | Olds et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
| 5739785 | Allison et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
| 5764187 | Rudish et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5790070 | Natarajan et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
| 5810284 | Hibbs et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5839053 | Bosch et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5848060 | Dent | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5856804 | Turcotte et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
| 5864579 | Briskman | Jan 1999 | A |
| 5903549 | von der Embse et al. | May 1999 | A |
| 5909460 | Dent | Jun 1999 | A |
| 5917447 | Wang et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
| 5920284 | Victor | Jul 1999 | A |
| 5944770 | Enge et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5945948 | Buford et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5949766 | Ibanez-Meier et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5969674 | von der Embse et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
| 5973647 | Barrett et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
| 5982337 | Newman et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
| 6016124 | Lo et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
| 6018316 | Rudish et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
| 6020845 | Weinberg et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6061562 | Martin et al. | May 2000 | A |
| 6111542 | Day et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6138012 | Krutz et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6147658 | Higashi et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6151308 | Ibanez-Meier et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6157811 | Dent | Dec 2000 | A |
| 6173178 | Hammill et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6266528 | Farzaneh | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6380893 | Chang et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6388615 | Chang et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6400925 | Tirabassi et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
| 20010048389 | Nakagawa | Dec 2001 | A1 |
| 20020006795 | Norin et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 0190927 | Aug 1986 | EP |
| 0335 558 | Apr 1989 | EP |
| 0647976 | Apr 1995 | EP |
| 0 860 952 | Aug 1998 | EP |
| 0860952 | Aug 1998 | EP |
| 0 961 416 | Dec 1999 | EP |
| 1 161 001 | Dec 2001 | EP |
| 1161001 | Dec 2001 | EP |
| 2271 902 | Oct 1993 | GB |
| 2306 827 | May 1997 | GB |
| 2 349 045 | Oct 2000 | GB |
| 2-28580 | Jan 1990 | JP |
| 3-291584 | Dec 1991 | JP |
| 4-27887 | Jan 1992 | JP |
| 07146995 | Jun 1995 | JP |
| 08015405 | Jan 1996 | JP |
| 09026328 | Jan 1997 | JP |
| 09113600 | May 1997 | JP |
| 10090391 | Apr 1998 | JP |
| 2001345747 | Dec 2001 | JP |
| WO 9707609 | Feb 1997 | WO |
| WO 9733342 | Sep 1997 | WO |
| WO 9923769 | May 1999 | WO |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20020106041 A1 | Aug 2002 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 60266813 | Feb 2001 | US |