Various fields such as, for example, biotechnology, semiconductor, pharmaceutical, food processing, and medical, require fluid handling systems that are clean and sterile while at the same time having increased cycle life and operating pressure. A very important consideration is ease with which the fluid handling components can be cleaned. The ease with which a system can be cleaned depends on, among other things, minimal dead volumes and entrapment areas. The fluid handling system must also use components that are inert to the fluid. Such systems often use valves as flow control devices, and diaphragm valves in particular are often used.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,549,134 (the ““134 patent” hereinafter), the entire disclosure of which is fully incorporated herein by reference, describes a diaphragm valve design that is particularly well suited for these various sanitary applications. The present invention is directed to various improvements and additional features in the design of the “134 patent valve to enhance its cleanability and operating performance including, among other things, its operating pressure characteristic and cycle life. Still further the present invention is directed to increasing the flow rate.
Another important aspect of valves that are used in clean environments is the sealing of the fluid within the valve and thereby preventing contamination of surrounding environment. Many valves, including radial diaphragm valves, incorporate a flexure member, which acts as a barrier between the process fluid and the external environment. This member forms a peripheral seal around the fluid portion of the valve cavity while allowing the center seat portion to flex to seal off the fluid entrance. For valves that are used in connection with highly corrosive chemicals, the flexure member is made from an inert substance, such as PFA or PTFE. However, due to the nature of these substances and the relatively thin flexure sections they form, many corrosive fluids are capable of permeating the flexure section to the surrounding environment. In order to keep the corrosive fluids from permeating the flexure section, the thickness of the flexure section can be increased. However, the increase in the thickness of the flexure member subjects the flexure member to higher stress levels, which frequently cause early failure of the diaphragm web. As such, there exists a need for a diaphragm that is chemically resistant and provides a quality seal around the fluid passageway, wherein the diaphragm further minimizes permeation of corrosive chemicals, yet maintains a high degree of flexure.
To the accomplishment of the foregoing objectives, and in accordance with one embodiment of the invention, a sanitary diaphragm valve is provided that includes a dome shaped diaphragm having a central boss that can be connected to or driven by a valve actuator, an outer peripheral region, and a relatively thin web portion that connects the boss to the outer peripheral region.
In one embodiment, the web portion is arcuate or dome shaped. The thinner web portion permits the diaphragm to have an extended cycle life and to enable the valve to operate at higher fluid pressures. In accordance with another aspect of the invention, the thin web may be defined by multiple curved surfaces. In one embodiment, the multiple curved surfaces are realized in the form of two surfaces with different radiuses of curvature. Another aspect of the present invention is the optimization of the diaphragm web to minimize permeation of corrosive chemicals while maintaining a high degree of flexure. One way of achieving this is to place less stress on the diaphragm. In one embodiment less force is placed on the diaphragm as the diaphragm shape is more conducive to be stretched further downward than upward from the neutral position.
In accordance with a further aspect of the invention, a valve body is provided that includes a bowl shaped valve cavity. This valve cavity includes an outer contour to permit more thorough cleaning and to eliminate entrapment areas. In a preferred embodiment, the valve cavity outer contour is realized in the form of a substantially vertical edge joined to the cavity by a smooth transition such as a radius, for example.
In a further embodiment of the invention, the actuator housing provides support surfaces for the diaphragm that reduces stress on the diaphragm particularly at higher operating pressures.
In accordance with another aspect of the invention, a deep bowl cavity design is used with a diaphragm that seals radially outside one of the valve ports. This concept greatly improves flow rates and also permits the port to open to the valve cavity off-axis to eliminate a right angle elbow inlet. Still a further aspect of the invention is a diaphragm stem that is undercut to provide a surface area that in response to back pressure urges the valve diaphragm to a closed position. This feature also may be used to realize a check valve.
These and other aspects and advantages of the present invention will be apparent to those skilled in the art from the following description of the preferred embodiments in view of the accompanying drawings.
The invention may take physical form in certain parts and arrangements of parts, preferred embodiments and a method of which will be described in detail in this specification and illustrated in the accompanying drawings which form a part hereof, and wherein:
With reference to
Although a number of alternative embodiments or examples are presented herein, such examples are not intended to be and should not be construed as being an exhaustive list. Many different electrical, mechanical and materials variations to the described embodiments will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art, whether explicitly stated herein or not, and such variations may be made without departing from the teachings and scope of the invention. Furthermore, the invention includes a number of different aspects, each of which may be used separately or in combination with any one or more of the other aspects of the invention.
The actuator B in this embodiment is an air operated actuator, however, a valve in accordance with the present invention can be actuated in any manner convenient to the designer, including electromechanical actuation, hydraulic, pneumatic, manual and so forth. Therefore, the operational details of the actuator B are not essential to the present invention, except that in accordance with one aspect of the invention, the actuator stem C includes a diaphragm support structure as will be described herein below in greater detail. For purposes of the present description, it is sufficient to understand that the actuator stem C moves axially (vertically in the view of
The basic valve assembly 10 further includes the valve body F having a valve chamber or cavity K formed therein as described in the “134 patent. The diaphragm E is used to seal this cavity K. An inlet fluid passage L opens to the valve cavity K at the inlet port G. An outlet fluid passage M opens to the valve cavity K at an outlet port N. Suitable fittings P can be used to provide fluid tight connections of the valve to upstream and downstream fluid conduits or other flow control devices (not shown).
With reference to
With reference to
The central boss 12 extends from a central diaphragm body portion 22. A conical tip 24 is formed at an end of the central diaphragm body 22 that is opposite the boss 12. The conical tip 24 is circumscribed by an annular seal surface 26. The conical tip 24 improves the flow rate of fluid through the valve. Other geometric profiles of the tip 24 may be used. For example, a frusto-conical tip may be used, as may a cone shape with a rounded or radius tip. The particular profile selected will depend on the valve design and flow characteristics desired.
The peripheral edge 14 is provided in this exemplary embodiment by a circumferential rim 28. The rim 28 is joined to the central body 22 by the continuous dome shaped web 16. As illustrated in
In accordance with one aspect of the invention, the web 16 has a non-uniform thickness 34 along its radial extent between the central body 22 and the rim 28. Alternatively, the web may have a substantially uniform thickness between the central body 22 and the rim 28. The web 16 is preferably but not necessarily thinnest in its central region 36 and gradually thickens to the areas where the web 16 joins the central portion 22 and the rim 28. By this structure, the web 16 is very flexible but avoids stress concentrations that could tend to weaken over many operating cycles.
The varying thickness of the web 16 is achieved in the embodiment of
The upper surface 30 of the web 16 is joined to the rim 28 by a radius 46 or other smoothly blended transition. The inner concave surface 32 is joined to the central body 22 by a radius transition 48 or other smoothly blended transition. The inner surface 32 is also joined to the rim 28 by a radius 50 or other smooth transition or blend. In this embodiment it will be noted that the radius 48 forms or transitions from a surface 48a that extends radially outward from the central body towards the rim 28.
An advantage of the dome shaped diaphragm design is that the web 16 is not subjected to high tensile stress in the radial direction when the diaphragm is flexed to the closed position as illustrated in FIG. 1B. The increased flexibility of the diaphragm E also reduces the actuator force required to close the valve. This has the additional benefit of increasing the shut-off pressure rating of the valve.
In accordance with another aspect of the invention, the rim 28 is designed to have a width “w” to height “h” ratio of about two to one. This exemplary ratio helps assure that the rim 28 is not too thick because some materials will tend to cold flow, particularly polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE). However, in applications where cold flow is not a significant concern or for different size diaphragms or where other materials are used for the diaphragm, the rim 28 can be formed with different ratios.
The diaphragm E may be made of any suitable material that is compatible with the fluid passing through the valve. Examples include PTFE and TFM, the latter being a modified version of PTFE. However, the diaphragm E can be made from any flexible material including but not limited to elastomers such as EPDM, Buna™, Viton™ and so forth and polymers such as, for example, HOSTAFLON® TF™, HOSTAFLON® TFM™, Teflon NXT™, to name a few examples.
Some of these listed materials, such as, for example PTFE or Teflon NXT™, are preferred over others due to their chemical resistance. In accordance with another aspect of the present invention, the diaphragm may be optimized to be chemically resistant while maintaining a high level of flexure. The arcuate shape of the diaphragm web 16 minimizes the fluid pressure forces which act to move the boss 12 in the axial direction. The arcuate shape of the web 16 permits the diaphragm E to change shape rather than stretching to achieve movement. Since the web 16 has a high degree of flexure, the thickness of the web can be optimized to reduce permeation of corrosive chemicals. The desired thickness can be determined by charting film thickness versus permeation rate. This data can be used to determine a starting point for the desired thickness.
The shape and dimensions of the web 16 an then be optimized to provide the desired flexure. Finite Element Analysis can be used to facilitate in minimizing stress and creep in the diaphragm E. As such, the ratios of the web thickness to the web length and the web height to the web length define the overall shape of the diaphragm. As shown in
Within these preferred ranges for the web thickness to web length ratio and the web height to web length ratio, the diaphragm shape is more conducive to being stretched further downward than upward from the neutral position. During normal operation of a diaphragm valve, the diaphragm is exposed to force not only from the pressure of the system, but also from the inherent spring force caused by the deformation of the diaphragm. For the preferred diaphragm design, the diaphragm shape allows the diaphragm to stretch downward towards the closed position with less force. Since less force is required to seal the diaphragm, the diaphragm provides a better seal and is subjected to less stress. Preferably, the ratio of the diaphragm downward stroke to the diaphragm upward stroke is about 1.25.
With reference to
As noted herein before, a significant advantage of the diaphragm E is the use of the thin web 16. The thin web 16 substantially increases the flexibility of the diaphragm E. This increased flexibility allows the actuator C (
In
The actuator housing D also includes a peripheral flat clamping portion 58 that cooperates with an opposed peripheral flat or near flat clamping portion 60 of the valve body F. The rim 28 is sandwiched and compressed between the actuator housing flat 58 and the valve body flat 60 to thus clamp the diaphragm E in the valve assembly. As shown in
In some valve designs, the actuator housing D will not always be adjacent the diaphragm upper surface 30, but rather some other structural member of the valve or actuator (such as a bonnet for example) will serve the purpose of clamping the diaphragm into the assembly 10. In such cases, this structural member can be modified to include an extension or other portion that overlays and supports the diaphragm E outer surface.
The convex diaphragm support portion 54 initially engages and supports the diaphragm outer surface 30, particularly when the valve is open (as viewed in FIG. 3). If there is significant inlet fluid pressure from the inlet port G, the diaphragm will tend to bow upward. However, the upper surface 30 of the diaphragm will then be in contact with or engage the concave portion 56 to prevent excessive bowing. The radially inward portion 56 is concave to more closely conform to the shape of the domed diaphragm, particularly when the diaphragm is bowed due to high pressure. The concave contour 56 can thus support a significant portion of the radially inward outer surface area of the diaphragm E. However, those skilled in the art will appreciate that the concave portion could also be planar or convex as required for a particular application, as could the convex portion 54. Furthermore, in the preferred embodiment of
Thus, the contour of the support surface 52 illustrated in the drawings is intended to be exemplary in nature. This contour should be designed to support as much of the outer surface 30 area of the diaphragm as possible, especially when the diaphragm is under high internal pressure force.
The actuator tip J can also be used to provide a diaphragm support surface. As illustrated in
As indicated on
As noted herein before, the valve body F is formed with the bowl shaped contour 68 to define part of the valve chamber K. As illustrated in
In addition to forming a flush or slightly overlapped alignment between the edge 76 and the inner edge 74 of the diaphragm rim 28, the rim 28 is joined to the diaphragm web portion 36 by a radius or other smooth transition 50 that terminates at a surface 74 that is preferably, but not necessarily, substantially parallel to the longitudinal axis R of the diaphragm. Similarly, the valve cavity edge 76 is preferably formed by a radius or other smooth transition 80 that terminates at one end at a surface 78 that is preferably, but not necessarily, substantially parallel to the longitudinal axis R of the diaphragm and/or the flow axis through the outlet port N. The transition 80 at an opposite end transitions into the bowl shaped contour curvilinear surface 68 that defines part of the valve chamber. This arrangement significantly improves the cleanability of the valve.
With reference to
The valve illustrated in
In the embodiments of
With reference to
In
The diaphragm E as shown is somewhat modified from the earlier embodiments described herein (and which will be explained in greater detail below), but the deep bowl concept may be used with any suitable diaphragm design. Furthermore, the invention may be realized for metal or plastic valves, including metal or plastic valve bodies and/or diaphragms. In accordance with the deep bowl aspect of the invention, the valve body F has a generally curvilinear valve cavity surface 302 therein that forms a valve cavity 308 that is sealed by the overlaying diaphragm E. Preferably but not necessarily the surface 302 is curvilinear and in the illustrated embodiment is spherical. Other geometric configurations may be used as required for a particular valve application, however, the spherical geometry is relatively easy to machine and provides a cavity profile that achieves the higher flow rate desired while maintaining excellent cleanability. In the exemplary embodiment of
When the cavity surface 302 is substantially hemispherical there is no need for the transition portion 80 and more specifically the edge wall portion 78 that was described herein with reference to FIG. 3. This is because the hemispherical bowl surface 302 will join the diaphragm E at an interface 305 having a tangent that is substantially parallel to the axis Y.
The deep bowl concept may be realized with other cavity 308 geometric configurations besides a hemisphere. For example, the surface 302 may be defined by a parabolic or elliptical function. The surface 302 may also include a spherical or other curved portion and one or more cylindrical portions. The deep bowl concept therefore contemplates in more general terms any one or more of the following characteristics, namely, 1) a bowl depth dimension Z (
The first port H opens to the valve cavity 308 near the bottom of the cavity opposite the valve actuator D. In accordance with one aspect of the invention, the diaphragm tip G has a diameter that is greater than the port H and seals in an area 310 of the bowl surface 302 that is substantially radially outside or spaced from the port H (see FIG. 12). Preferably, the tip G seals at a location that is radially between or about midway between the first and second ports H and I. The tip G may be provided with a convex radius or other contour (not shown) to effect a line seal. When used, the tip G radius should be greater than the radius of the cavity surface 302.
By having the tip G seal radially outside the first port H and in combination with the deep bowl design, when the diaphragm E is pulled away by the actuator stem C to open the valve, a substantially larger flow cross area opens to the port H. For example, a 2:1 ratio can be achieved between the cross-sectional flow area within the cavity 308 and the cross-sectional flow area of the flow bore 312. In other words, as compared to a shallow bowl design, the same amount of linear stroke of the actuator D presents a substantially larger cross-sectional flow area to the fluid from the first port H. The smaller diameter spherical design of the cavity 308 achieves a substantial nonincreasing cross-sectional flow area as the tip G is withdrawn from the port H to open the valve. A further enhancement for improving flow through the valve is to optimize the location of the valve stem tip G relative to the outlet port I. In other words, when the valve is in the open position, the stem tip G may be designed so as to deflect or assist in directing the flow from the first port H to the second port I. If the stem tip G is positioned too high relative to the port I flow path, turbulence may occur, and if the tip G is too low relative to the port I flow may be unnecessarily restricted. Preferably, the port I will be positioned as close to the port H as possible while allowing sufficient area for the tip G to seal substantially radially spaced from the port H. Also, in many cases it will be desirable to make the entry angle of the port I as shallow as possible.
In accordance with another aspect of the invention, by providing the seal area radially outside the port H, the port H need not be centered exactly on a diametric line of the cavity 308. In other words, in a typical radial diaphragm valve, the port sealed by the diaphragm stem G is centered on an axis that is collinear with the translation axis of the stem G. This arises from the fact that the stem must seal at the port. In the present invention, however, more options are available for positioning the port H within the cavity surface 311 that lies between the port H and the seal area 310. For example, in
In accordance with an additional aspect of the invention, the diaphragm stem G includes a radial undercut portion 316 (see FIG. 12). By radial undercut is simply meant that the stem has a greater diameter at the tip G then tapers inwardly along the stem until joining the web portion J of the diaphragm E. This undercut 316 thus provides a somewhat lateral circumferential surface area 318 opposite the tip G surface. This circumferential surface area 318 is thus exposed to any fluid back pressure from the second port I. This back pressure will thus tend to apply a force to the stem surface 318 when the diaphragm is in the closed position (
In the embodiment of
With continued reference to
When the first port H is machined on any axis X other than the center bottom of the bowl (along axis Y), the port H will have a non-circular geometry, such as an ellipse, for example.
In accordance with another aspect of the invention illustrated in
Those skilled in the art will appreciate that the various improvements and aspects of the present invention may be used individually or in various combinations with each other as required for a particular valve application.
The invention has been described with reference to the preferred embodiment. Obviously, modifications and alterations will occur to others upon a reading and understanding of this specification. It is intended to include all such modifications and alterations insofar as they come within the scope of the appended claims or the equivalents thereof.
This application is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/109,413, filed on Mar. 28, 2002 for SANITARY DIAPHRAGM VALVE, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/231,683 filed on Jan. 14, 1999 now U.S. Pat. No. 6,123,320 for SANITARY DIAPHRAGM VALVE which claims the benefit of U.S. provisional patent application Ser. No. 60/103,722 filed on Oct. 9, 1998 for SANITARY DIAPHRAGM VALVE, the entire disclosures of which are fully incorporated herein by reference. This application also claims the benefit of U.S. provisional patent application Ser. No. 60/192,785 filed on Mar. 28, 2000 for SANITARY DIAPHRAGM VALVE, the entire disclosure of which is fully incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
209867 | Craigie | Nov 1878 | A |
2278002 | Thompson | Mar 1942 | A |
2517484 | Henneman | Aug 1950 | A |
2683580 | Griswold | Jul 1954 | A |
2701118 | Uhler | Feb 1955 | A |
2752936 | Cantalupo | Jul 1956 | A |
2811167 | Bott | Oct 1957 | A |
2849019 | Oliveau et al. | Aug 1958 | A |
2865402 | Miller | Dec 1958 | A |
2988322 | Anderson | Jun 1961 | A |
RE25236 | Davies et al. | Sep 1962 | E |
3073341 | Schernekau | Jan 1963 | A |
3080887 | Brandenberg | Mar 1963 | A |
3080888 | Brinkel | Mar 1963 | A |
3545722 | Bovio | Dec 1970 | A |
4014514 | Priese et al. | Mar 1977 | A |
4029121 | Buzzi | Jun 1977 | A |
4074697 | Saether | Feb 1978 | A |
4212320 | Stoll et al. | Jul 1980 | A |
4295488 | Book | Oct 1981 | A |
4376315 | Badger et al. | Mar 1983 | A |
4394847 | Langenegger et al. | Jul 1983 | A |
4408702 | Horvath | Oct 1983 | A |
4409005 | McKendrick | Oct 1983 | A |
4451562 | Elgas et al. | May 1984 | A |
4452276 | Hozumi et al. | Jun 1984 | A |
4484562 | Burt | Nov 1984 | A |
4534755 | Calvert et al. | Aug 1985 | A |
4561627 | Meckstroth | Dec 1985 | A |
4629119 | Plunkett et al. | Dec 1986 | A |
4671317 | MacKay | Jun 1987 | A |
4754776 | McKee | Jul 1988 | A |
4848722 | Webster | Jul 1989 | A |
4860990 | Fukuzawa et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
5002086 | Linder | Mar 1991 | A |
5067516 | Gale | Nov 1991 | A |
5073149 | Maruyama et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
5108067 | Straub | Apr 1992 | A |
5108069 | Tada et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
5173033 | Adahan | Dec 1992 | A |
5222523 | Trimble | Jun 1993 | A |
5265843 | Kleinhappl | Nov 1993 | A |
5282281 | Clear et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5295662 | Yamaji et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5326078 | Kimura | Jul 1994 | A |
5333643 | Gilchrist et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5335691 | Kolenc | Aug 1994 | A |
5335858 | Dunning et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5549134 | Browne et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5641271 | Forrester et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5730423 | Wu et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5762086 | Ollivier | Jun 1998 | A |
5950675 | Minami et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5992455 | Koller et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5996559 | Busato et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6007046 | Rothermel | Dec 1999 | A |
6056003 | Madsen et al. | May 2000 | A |
6123320 | Rasanow et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6394417 | Browne et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6416038 | Sindel et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
31 23 028 | Jan 1983 | DE |
0 063 772 | Nov 1982 | EP |
0 160 461 | Nov 1985 | EP |
0 046 513 | Sep 1987 | EP |
0 312 500 | Apr 1989 | EP |
0 536 047 | Apr 1993 | EP |
0 581 287 | Feb 1994 | EP |
0 853 205 | Jul 1998 | EP |
0 886 090 | Dec 1998 | EP |
0 928 917 | Jul 1999 | EP |
55-2879 | Oct 1978 | JP |
1-93674 | Apr 1989 | JP |
11-37329 | Feb 1999 | JP |
11037329 | Feb 1999 | JP |
11-118049 | Apr 1999 | JP |
WO 9935437 | Jul 1999 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20030155546 A1 | Aug 2003 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60103722 | Oct 1998 | US | |
60192785 | Mar 2000 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 09231683 | Jan 1999 | US |
Child | 10109413 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10109413 | Mar 2002 | US |
Child | 10249050 | US |