The invention is based on saw blade, in particular for metal applications.
In order to be able to machine various materials with a saw, different saw blades are known, which have application-specific serrations, e.g. a constant tooth spacing and/or a vario-serration, etc. A vario-serration has different tooth spacings.
The reference DE 195 01 019 A1 describes a saw blade with a constant tooth spacing and teeth with different tooth shapes. It describes standard teeth, humped teeth, and roof-shaped teeth. The humped teeth with sharply rounded tooth backs or the roof-shaped teeth are used as supporting teeth. By contrast, the standard teeth with straight tooth backs or the humped teeth with low-slope tooth backs are used as aggressively cutting teeth.
If the tooth shapes are disposed in an alternating sequence, the aggressively cutting teeth can be supported by the humped or roof-shaped teeth and the aggressively cutting teeth can be prevented from breaking due to heavy loads.
The alternating tooth shapes can be deflected lateral to the saw blade by corrugation or setting of the saw blade. The corrugation or setting produces a cutting width that is greater than the thickness of the saw blade. A wedging and jamming of the saw blade can be prevented and the cutting behavior can be improved.
The invention is based on a saw blade, in particular for metal applications, with a serration that has at least a first and a second basic tooth spacing.
The invention proposes that in at least a partial region with three successive basic tooth spacings, the first and second basic tooth spacings are always disposed in a directly alternating sequence: a larger and a smaller basic tooth spacing. An advantageous supporting action for aggressively cutting teeth, a high rate of material removal via the cutting motion, and particularly an advantageous removal of cuttings by means of the larger basic tooth spacing are achieved. A breakage of teeth can be prevented and a long service life can be achieved.
The invention also proposes that the serration include at least two tooth shapes: an aggressively cutting tooth shape and a supporting tooth shape. The aggressively cutting tooth is advantageously constituted by a standard tooth and the supporting tooth is constituted by a roof-shaped or humped tooth. The supporting action can be improved in comparison to a serration with only one tooth shape in that the aggressively cutting tooth is supported by the supporting tooth. Under heavy loads, the supporting tooth can absorb powerful forces and can prevent breakage of the aggressively cutting tooth. In particular, an advantageous supporting action is achieved if, in the direction opposite from the cutting movement direction, the larger basic tooth spacing is followed by a roof-shaped or humped tooth and the smaller basic tooth spacing is followed by a standard tooth.
When there are two different basic tooth spacings and two different tooth shapes, two teeth are advantageously viewed as a single unit and are deflected lateral to the cutting movement direction by means of corrugation and/or setting. The corrugation or setting produces a cutting width that is greater than the thickness of the saw blade. A wedging and jamming of the saw blade can be prevented and the cutting behavior can be improved. Furthermore, it is particularly easy to achieve the fact that in the direction counter to the cutting movement direction, the roof-shaped or humped tooth can always be placed in a protective manner in front of the standard tooth. It has turned out that an advantageous cutting and guide behavior is produced if two units deflected in opposite directions are followed by an undeflected unit.
The serration can also be set or corrugated in other variations deemed useful by one skilled in the art. For example, only the roof-shaped or humped teeth can be deflected to the right and left, lateral to the cutting movement direction, by means of corrugation and/or setting and the standard teeth can remain undeflected, standing straight up on the saw blade.
The invention also proposes that an average of the first and second basic tooth spacing essentially correspond to a standard tooth spacing. The cutting performance and the service life of a saw blade according to the invention can be compared with particular ease to a standard saw blade. It is particularly advantageous to provide a basic tooth spacing with a deviation of ±10% to ±30% from a standard tooth spacing. For example, starting from a conventional standard tooth spacing, if the first basic tooth spacing is increased by 10%, then the second basic tooth spacing is reduced by 10%. The basic tooth spacings can also be embodied with different percentage deviations.
If the basic tooth spacing of the saw blade in the cutting movement direction is embodied with a progressively increasing first and second basic tooth spacing, then this can achieve the fact that materials with different material thicknesses can be machined in an advantageous manner.
The embodiment according to the invention can be used in various saw blades deemed suitable by one skilled in the art for a variety of application fields and materials, such as circular saw blades, sabre saw blades, etc., which can be both manually and machine driven. However, the embodiment according to the invention can be used to particular advantage in highly loaded saw blades that are used in machine tools or hand machine tools, in particular saw blades for metal applications.
Other advantages ensue from the following description of the drawings. The drawings show an exemplary embodiment of the invention. The drawings, the specification, and the claims contain numerous features in combination. One skilled in the art will also suitably consider the features individually and unite them in other meaningful combinations.
The saw blade has a serration 14 with a first basic tooth spacing 16 and a second basic tooth spacing 18; the first basic tooth spacing 16 is smaller than the second basic tooth spacing 18 (
The roof-shaped tooth 20 is embodied as a supporting tooth and is always disposed after the larger basic tooth spacing 18 in the direction counter to a cutting movement direction 24. The aggressively cutting standard tooth 22 always follows the smaller basic tooth spacing 16.
Periodically, units with two teeth 20, 22 are deflected lateral to the cutting movement direction 24 by means of setting; two units deflected in opposite directions are followed by an undeflected unit (
An average of the first and second basic tooth spacing 16, 18 corresponds to a standard tooth spacing of 1.81 mm. The larger basic tooth spacing 18 is 10% greater than 1.81 mm and the smaller basic tooth spacing 16 is 10% smaller than 1.81 mm. All of the teeth 20, 22 have an effective cutting angle α of 5°. The standard teeth 22 have a clearance angle β of 35°. Considered in the direction opposite the cutting movement direction 24, the roof-shaped teeth 20 have a front clearance angle γ of 23° and a rear clearance angle δ of 33°. Other angle values deemed useful by one skilled in the art can be selected according to the material to be machined or in combination with a different basic tooth spacing.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
100 63 567 | Dec 2000 | DE | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP01/12687 | 11/2/2001 | WO | 00 | 10/15/2002 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO02/49793 | 6/27/2002 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
23330 | Wilson | Mar 1859 | A |
154104 | Vosburgh | Aug 1874 | A |
706447 | Peart | Aug 1902 | A |
1328982 | Calkins | Jan 1920 | A |
2071618 | Ferrarl | Feb 1937 | A |
2141504 | Balfour et al. | Dec 1938 | A |
2603251 | Christenson | Jul 1952 | A |
3171457 | Brown | Mar 1965 | A |
3292674 | Turner | Dec 1966 | A |
4195543 | Tapply et al. | Apr 1980 | A |
4311075 | Sundström | Jan 1982 | A |
RE31433 | Clark | Nov 1983 | E |
4557172 | Yoneda | Dec 1985 | A |
4688458 | Krilov | Aug 1987 | A |
4920652 | Johnson | May 1990 | A |
4958546 | Yoshida et al. | Sep 1990 | A |
5018421 | Lucki et al. | May 1991 | A |
5062338 | Baker | Nov 1991 | A |
5119708 | Musgrove | Jun 1992 | A |
5231909 | Hsu | Aug 1993 | A |
5477763 | Kullman | Dec 1995 | A |
5606900 | Stoddard | Mar 1997 | A |
5697280 | Armstrong et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5743163 | Lavinder | Apr 1998 | A |
5868058 | Senegas | Feb 1999 | A |
5918525 | Schramm | Jul 1999 | A |
D415401 | Imboden et al. | Oct 1999 | S |
6003422 | Holston | Dec 1999 | A |
6065380 | Lundh | May 2000 | A |
6119571 | Hayden, Sr. | Sep 2000 | A |
6244152 | Di Nicolantonio | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6505537 | Vöge | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6532852 | Tsujimoto et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
D482945 | Grolimund | Dec 2003 | S |
6681674 | Hakansson et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6883412 | Turfitt | Apr 2005 | B1 |
7127979 | Kocher et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
20020194975 | Bishop | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030116006 | Graf | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030177645 | Flury et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20040035282 | Tsujimoto | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040255749 | Hayden, Sr. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050211046 | Thomas et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20060016315 | Zorich et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060130628 | Rompel et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060162526 | Nagano et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20070251372 | Petts et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080121079 | Hashimoto et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20090145280 | Bucks et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20100126328 | Grolimund | May 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
693531 | Sep 2003 | CH |
195 01 019 | Jul 1996 | DE |
19501019 | Jul 1996 | DE |
10300392 | Jul 2004 | DE |
1 009 600 | Jun 2000 | EP |
1803517 | Jul 2007 | EP |
082980 | Aug 1980 | FR |
2785563 | May 2000 | FR |
9262759 | Oct 1997 | JP |
11-082395 | Mar 1999 | JP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20030051593 A1 | Mar 2003 | US |