The present invention relates to methods and devices for repairing and replacing torn or damaged tissue, and in particular to tissue implants having viable tissue capable of tissue regeneration and integration with tissue surrounding the area to be repaired, as well as methods for using such tissue implants.
Injuries to tissue, such as cartilage, skin, muscle, bone, tendon, and ligament where the tissue has been injured or traumatized frequently require surgical intervention to repair the damage and facilitate healing. Such surgical repairs can include suturing or otherwise repairing the damaged tissue with known medical devices, augmenting the damaged tissue with other tissue, using an implant, a graft or any combination of these techniques. Despite these conventional methods of tissue repair, there continues to be a need for surgical solutions that facilitate the regeneration of new, healthy tissue to provide more reliable repair and healing of the injured or damaged tissue over the long term.
The search for a reliable source of viable cells for tissue regeneration has been pursued for years. Recent tissue engineering techniques for repairing tissue have typically involved replacing or reconstructing damaged or injured tissue with cells that have been manipulated ex vivo to stimulate new tissue growth. The cells are usually incorporated into a delivery vehicle (e.g., a scaffold or surgical implant) for placement at the tissue site, whereupon new tissue can be grown. Various surgical implants are known and have been used in surgical procedures to help achieve these benefits. For example, it is known to use various devices and techniques for creating implants having isolated cells loaded onto a delivery vehicle. Such cell-seeded implants have been used in an in vitro method of making and/or repairing cartilage by growing cartilaginous structures that consist of chondrocytes seeded onto biodegradable, biocompatible fibrous polymeric matrices as well as matrices developed from collageneous materials. Such methods require the initial isolation of chondrocytes from cartilaginous tissue prior to the chondrocytes being seeded onto the polymeric matrices. Other techniques for repairing damaged tissue employ implants having stem or progenitor cells that are used to produce the desired tissue. For example, it is known to use stem or progenitor cells, such as the cells within fatty tissue, muscle, bone marrow, or embryonic tissue to regenerate bone, cartilage, and other soft tissues in a patient. For example, stem cells from fat are removed from the patient and placed in an environment favorable to cartilage formation, thereby inducing the cells to proliferate and to create a different type of cell, such as cartilage cells.
While the trend towards using tissue engineering approaches to tissue repair continues to gain popularity, mainly because of the long-term benefits provided to the patient, these current techniques are not without drawbacks. One disadvantage with current tissue engineering techniques is that they can be time consuming. A typical process involves the harvest of a tissue sample from the patient in a first surgical procedure, which is then transported to a laboratory for cell isolation, culture and amplification. The cell sample is grown for a period of 3 to 4 weeks using standard cell culture techniques to create a cell bank. Once the cell population has reached a target number, the cells are sent back to the surgeon for implantation during a second surgical procedure. This manual, labor-intensive process is extremely costly and time consuming. Although the clinical data suggest long-term benefits for the patient, the prohibitive cost of the procedure, combined with the traumatic impact of two surgical procedures, has hampered adoption of these techniques. And though allografts have been used for tissue repair in the past, this solution is also not ideal because of the limited availability of graft material and the potential for disease transmission.
For these reasons, there continues to exist a need in this art for novel devices and methods for regenerating tissue which are less time consuming and easier to implement. It is also desirable to provide an implant which can serve as a reliable source of viable cells, and which can be made in a quick and efficient manner for immediate use during surgery. There is thus a need for a less costly solution to repairing tissue defects or injuries that also provides the advantages of tissue regeneration, without the encumbrances of the currently available devices and methods of tissue repair previously mentioned.
The present invention generally provides a composite implant for repairing a tissue defect in a patient. In one embodiment, the implant is a porous tissue scaffold having at least one pocket formed therein and adapted to contain a viable tissue. The tissue scaffold can have a variety of shapes and configurations, and in one embodiment it includes top and bottom portions. The top and bottom portions can be at least partially mated to one another, and in an exemplary embodiment they are heat sealed to one another around a perimeter thereof to form an enclosed pocket therebetween. Heat sealing can be performed either before or after the viable tissue is loaded into the scaffold. In another embodiment, the tissue scaffold is substantially wedge-shaped and the pocket comprises a hollow interior formed in the tissue scaffold, and/or at least one lumen extending into the tissue scaffold. The tissue scaffold can also optionally include at least one surface feature formed thereon to promote blood vessel formation. By way of non-limiting example, the surface feature can be in the form of a plurality of channels formed on an outer surface of the tissue scaffold.
In a further embodiment of the present invention, the tissue scaffold can include a viable tissue disposed within the pocket. The viable tissue should be effective to migrate into the scaffold to integrate with native tissue surrounding the scaffold. At least one bioactive substance can be applied to the viable tissue to stimulate cell growth. Suitable bioactive substances include, for example, blood clots, platelet rich plasma, cartilage-derived morphogenic proteins, recombinant human growth factors, and combinations thereof. In another embodiment, the bioactive substance can additionally or alternatively be applied to the tissue scaffold.
The present invention also provides a method for repairing defective tissue that includes the steps of providing a tissue scaffold having at least one pocket formed therein and adapted to contain a viable tissue, obtaining a viable tissue, loading the viable tissue into the at least one pocket of the tissue scaffold, and implanting the tissue scaffold with the viable tissue disposed therein at a defect site in a patient's body. The method can also include the step of applying at least one bioactive substance to the viable tissue to stimulate cell growth.
The invention will be more fully understood from the following detailed description taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, in which:
The present invention generally provides a composite implant that includes a tissue scaffold having at least one pocket formed therein, and a viable tissue disposed within the pocket of the tissue scaffold. The use of a pocket is particularly advantageous in that it helps retain viable tissue within the composite implant and it minimizes the loss of viable tissue following placement at a defect site in a patient. The pocket is also advantageous in that the viable tissue can migrate and populate the scaffold, thereby enhancing the integration between the native tissue and the composite implant.
A person skilled in the art will appreciate that the biocompatible composite implants of the present invention can be used in the treatment of various types of tissue for various purposes, including but not limited to tissue repair, tissue bulking, cosmetic treatments, therapeutic treatments, tissue remodeling or augmentation, and tissue sealing. In an exemplary embodiment, the implants are used for the repair and/or regeneration of diseased or damaged tissue.
The tissue scaffold used to form the composite implant of the present invention can have various configurations, shapes, and sizes.
In
Still referring to
In another embodiment of the present invention, one or more edges of the tissue scaffold can be at least partially sealed to one another to form the pocket which is adapted to contain a viable tissue. By way of non-limiting example,
In other embodiments of the present invention, the composite implant can include one or more surface features formed on the tissue scaffold to promote and/or guide blood vessel formation.
The materials used to form the composite implant of the present invention can also vary, and a variety of materials and techniques for forming a tissue scaffold are known in the art and can be used with the present invention. In an exemplary embodiment, however, the tissue scaffold is formed using a material or delivery vehicle that is biocompatible and that has sufficient structural integrity and physical and/or mechanical properties to effectively provide for ease of handling in an operating room environment. Sufficient strength and physical properties can be developed in the scaffold through the selection of materials used to form the scaffold, and the manufacturing process. In addition, the scaffold is preferably sufficiently porous to allow cell growth therein. Preferably, the median pore size is in the range of about 100 to 500 microns. The scaffold can also optionally be sufficiently pliable to allow the scaffold to adjust to the dimensions of the target site of implantation, and/or to accommodate tissue growth within the interior region of the scaffold, so that the geometry of the scaffold can be remodeled as tissue ingrowth increases.
In an exemplary embodiment, the scaffold is formed from a bioresorbable or bioabsorbable material, and more preferably from a bioresorbable or bioabsorbable material that has the ability to resorb in a timely fashion in the body environment. The differences in the absorption time under in vivo conditions can also be the basis for combining two different copolymers when forming the scaffolds of the present invention. For example, a copolymer of 35:65 ε-caprolactone and glycolide (a relatively fast absorbing polymer) can be blended with 40:60 ε-caprolactone and L-lactide copolymer (a relatively slow absorbing polymer) to form a biocompatible scaffold. Depending upon the processing technique used, the two constituents can be either randomly inter-connected bicontinuous phases, or the constituents could have a gradient-like architecture in the form of a laminate-type composite with a well integrated interface between the two constituent layers. The microstructure of these scaffolds can be optimized to regenerate or repair the desired anatomical features of the tissue that is being regrown.
In one embodiment of the present invention, the scaffold can be formed from a biocompatible polymer. A variety of biocompatible polymers can be used to make the biocompatible tissue implants or scaffold devices according to the present invention. The biocompatible polymers can be synthetic polymers, natural polymers or combinations thereof. As used herein the term “synthetic polymer” refers to polymers that are not found in nature, even if the polymers are made from naturally occurring biomaterials. The term “natural polymer” refers to polymers that are naturally occurring.
In embodiments where the scaffold includes at least one synthetic polymer, suitable biocompatible synthetic polymers can include polymers selected from the group consisting of aliphatic polyesters, poly(amino acids), copoly(ether-esters), polyalkylenes oxalates, polyamides, tyrosine derived polycarbonates, poly(iminocarbonates), polyorthoesters, polyoxaesters, polyamidoesters, polyoxaesters containing amine groups, poly(anhydrides), polyphosphazenes, poly(propylene fumarate), polyurethane, poly(ester urethane), poly(ether urethane), and blends and copolymers thereof. Suitable synthetic polymers for use in the present invention can also include biosynthetic polymers based on sequences found in collagen, laminin, glycosaminoglycans, elastin, thrombin, fibronectin, starches, poly(amino acid), gelatin, alginate, pectin, fibrin, oxidized cellulose, chitin, chitosan, tropoelastin, hyaluronic acid, silk, ribonucleic acids, deoxyribonucleic acids, polypeptides, proteins, polysaccharides, polynucleotides and combinations thereof.
For the purpose of this invention aliphatic polyesters include, but are not limited to, homopolymers and copolymers of lactide (which includes lactic acid, D-,L- and meso lactide); glycolide (including glycolic acid); ε-caprolactone; p-dioxanone (1,4-dioxan-2-one); trimethylene carbonate (1,3-dioxan-2-one); alkyl derivatives of trimethylene carbonate; δ-valerolactone; β-butyrolactone; γ-butyrolactone; α-decalactone; hydroxybutyrate; hydroxyvalerate; 1,4-dioxepan-2-one (including its dimer 1,5,8,12-tetraoxacyclotetradecane-7,14-dione); 1,5-dioxepan-2-one; 6,6-dimethyl-1,4-dioxan-2-one; 2,5-diketomorpholine; pivalolactone; α,αdiethylpropiolactone; ethylene carbonate; ethylene oxalate; 3-methyl-1,4-dioxane-2,5-dione; 3,3-diethyl-1,4-dioxan-2,5-dione; 6,6-dimethyl-dioxepan-2-one; 6,8-dioxabicycloctane-7-one and polymer blends thereof. Aliphatic polyesters used in the present invention can be homopolymers or copolymers (random, block, segmented, tapered blocks, graft, triblock, etc.) having a linear, branched or star structure. Other useful polymers include polyphosphazenes, co-, ter- and higher order mixed monomer based polymers made from L-lactide, D,L-lactide, lactic acid, glycolide, glycolic acid, para-dioxanone, trimethylene carbonate and ε-caprolactone.
In embodiments where the scaffold includes at least one natural polymer, suitable examples of natural polymers include, but are not limited to, fibrin-based materials, collagen-based materials, hyaluronic acid-based materials, glycoprotein-based materials, cellulose-based materials, silks and combinations thereof. By way of non-limiting example, the biocompatible scaffold can be constructed from a collagen-based small intestine submucosa.
In still yet another embodiment, the preferred scaffold for tissue repair, including cartilage, meniscus, tendon, ligament, and skin repair, is constructed from a naturally occurring extracellular matrix material (“ECM”), such as that found in the stomach, bladder, alimentary, respiratory, urinary, integumentary, genital tracts, or liver basement membrane of animals. Preferably, the ECM is derived from the alimentary tract of mammals, such as cows, sheeps, dogs, cats, and most preferably from the intestinal tract of pigs. The ECM is preferably small intestine submucosa (“SIS”), which can include the tunica submucosa, along with basilar portions of the tunica mucosa, particularly the lamina muscularis mucosa and the stratum compactum.
For the purposes of this invention, it is within the definition of a naturally occurring ECM to clean and/or comminute the ECM, or even to cross-link the collagen fibers within the ECM. Also, while reference is made to SIS, it is understood that other naturally occurring ECMs are within the scope of this invention. Thus, as used herein, the terms “naturally occurring extracellular matrix” or “naturally occurring ECM” can refer to extracellular matrix material that has been cleaned, disinfected, sterilized, and optionally cross-linked.
Where SIS is used, an SIS graft can be harvested in a variety of ways, as will be understood by one skilled in the art. The resulting graft material can have a variety of geometries and consistencies including for example, coiled, helical, spring-like, randomized, branched, sheet-like, tubular, spherical, fragmented, fluidized, comminuted, liquefied, foamed, suspended, gel-like, injectable, powdered, ground, and sheared.
In yet another embodiment of the present invention, the scaffold can be formed using tissue grafts, such as may be obtained from autogeneic tissue, allogeneic tissue and xenogeneic tissue. By way of non-limiting example, tissues such as skin, cartilage, ligament, tendon, periosteum, perichondrium, synovium, fascia, mesenter and sinew can be used as tissue grafts to form the biocompatible scaffold. In some embodiments where an allogeneic tissue is used, tissue from a fetus or newborns can be used to avoid the immunogenicity associated with some adult tissues.
In other embodiments of the present invention, the tissue scaffold can be formed from elastomeric copolymers such as, for example, polymers having an inherent viscosity in the range of about 1.2 dL/g to 4 dL/g, more preferably about 1.2 dL/g to 2 dL/g, and most preferably about 1.4 dL/g to 2 dL/g as determined at 25° C. in a 0.1 gram per deciliter (g/dL) solution of polymer in hexafluoroisopropanol (HFIP). Suitable elastomers also preferably exhibit a high percent elongation and a low modulus, while possessing good tensile strength and good recovery characteristics. In the preferred embodiments of this invention, the elastomer exhibits a percent elongation greater than about 200 percent and preferably greater than about 500 percent. In addition to these elongation and modulus properties, the elastomers should also have a tensile strength greater than about 500 psi, preferably greater than about 1,000 psi, and a tear strength of greater than about 50 lbs/inch, preferably greater than about 80 lbs/inch.
Exemplary biocompatible elastomers include, but are not limited to, elastomeric copolymers of ε-caprolactone and glycolide with a mole ratio of ε-caprolactone to glycolide of from about 35:65 to about 65:35, more preferably from 45:55 to 35:65; elastomeric copolymers of ε-caprolactone and lactide (including L-lactide, D-lactide, blends thereof, and lactic acid polymers and copolymers) where the mole ratio of ε-caprolactone to lactide is from about 95:5 to about 30:70 and more preferably from 45:55 to 30:70 or from about 95:5 to about 85:15; elastomeric copolymers of p-dioxanone (1,4-dioxan-2-one) and lactide (including L-lactide, D-lactide, blends thereof, and lactic acid polymers and copolymers) where the mole ratio of p-dioxanone to lactide is from about 40:60 to about 60:40; elastomeric copolymers of ε-caprolactone and p-dioxanone where the mole ratio of ε-caprolactone to p-dioxanone is from about from 30:70 to about 70:30; elastomeric copolymers of p-dioxanone and trimethylene carbonate where the mole ratio of p-dioxanone to trimethylene carbonate is from about 30:70 to about 70:30; elastomeric copolymers of trimethylene carbonate and glycolide (including polyglycolic acid) where the mole ratio of trimethylene carbonate to glycolide is from about 30:70 to about 70:30; elastomeric copolymers of trimethylene carbonate and lactide (including L-lactide, D-lactide, blends thereof, and lactic acid polymers and copolymers) where the mole ratio of trimethylene carbonate to lactide is from about 30:70 to about 70:30; and blends thereof. Other examples of suitable biocompatible elastomers are described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,468,253.
In another embodiment of the present invention, the tissue scaffold can be formed from an elastomer that is a copolymer of 35:65 ε-caprolactone and glycolide, formed in a dioxane solvent and including a polydioxanone mesh. In another embodiment, the elastomer used to form the tissue scaffold can be a copolymer of 40:60 ε-caprolactone and lactide with a polydioxanone mesh. In yet another embodiment, the elastomer is a 50:50 blend of a 35:65 copolymer of ε-caprolactone and glycolide and 40:60 copolymer of ε-caprolactone and lactide. The polydioxanone mesh may be in the form of a one layer thick two-dimensional mesh or a multi-layer thick three-dimensional mesh.
In another embodiment of the present invention, the tissue scaffold can be formed from a biocompatible ceramic material. Suitable biocompatible ceramic materials include, for example, hydroxyapatite, α-tricalcium phosphate, β-tricalcium phosphate, bioactive glass, calcium phosphate, calcium sulfate, calcium carbonate, xenogeneic and allogeneic bone material and combinations thereof. Suitable bioactive glass materials for use in the present invention include silicates containing calcium phosphate glass, or calcium phosphate glass with varying amounts of solid particles added to control resorption time. Suitable compounds that may be incorporated into the calcium phosphate bioactive glass include, but are not limited to, magnesium oxide, sodium oxide, potassium oxide, and combinations thereof.
In yet another embodiment of the present invention, the scaffold can be formed from a polymeric foam component having pores with an open cell pore structure. The pore size can vary, but preferably, the pores are sized to allow tissue ingrowth. More preferably, the pore size is in the range of about 50 to 1000 microns, and even more preferably, in the range of about 50 to 500 microns. The polymeric foam component can, optionally, contain a reinforcing component, such as for example, the textiles disclosed above. In some embodiments where the polymeric foam component contains a reinforcing component, the foam component can be integrated with the reinforcing component such that the pores of the foam component penetrate the mesh of the reinforcing component and interlock with the reinforcing component.
It may also be desirable to use polymer blends to form scaffolds which transition from one composition to another composition in a gradient-like architecture. Scaffolds having this gradient-like architecture are particularly advantageous in tissue engineering applications to repair or regenerate the structure of naturally occurring tissue such as cartilage (articular, meniscal, septal, tracheal, auricular, costal, etc.), tendon, ligament, nerve, esophagus, skin, bone, and vascular tissue. For example, by blending an elastomer of ε-caprolactone-co-glycolide with E-caprolactone-co-lactide (e.g., with a mole ratio of about 5:95) a scaffold may be formed that transitions from a softer spongy material to a stiffer more rigid material, for example, in a manner similar to the transition from cartilage to bone. Clearly, one skilled in the art will appreciate that other polymer blends may be used for similar gradient effects, or to provide different gradients (e.g., different absorption profiles, stress response profiles, or different degrees of elasticity).
One of ordinary skill in the art will appreciate that the selection of a suitable material for forming the biocompatible scaffold of the present invention depends on several factors. These factors include in vivo mechanical performance; cell response to the material in terms of cell attachment, proliferation, migration and differentiation; biocompatibility; and optionally, bioabsorption (or biodegradation) kinetics. Other relevant factors include the chemical composition, spatial distribution of the constituents, the molecular weight of the polymer, and the degree of crystallinity.
The tissue scaffold used to form the composite implant can also include a reinforcing material comprised of any absorbable or non-absorbable textile having, for example, woven, knitted, warped knitted (i.e., lace-like), non-woven, and braided structures. In one embodiment, the reinforcing material has a mesh-like structure. In any of the above structures, mechanical properties of the material can be altered by changing the density or texture of the material, the type of knit or weave of the material, the thickness of the material, or by embedding particles in the material. The mechanical properties of the material may also be altered by creating sites within the mesh where the fibers are physically bonded with each other or physically bonded with another agent, such as, for example, an adhesive or a polymer.
The fibers used to make the reinforcing component can include monofilaments, yarns, threads, braids, or bundles of fibers. These fibers can be made of any biocompatible material including bioabsorbable materials such as polylactic acid (PLA), polyglycolic acid (PGA), polycaprolactone (PCL), polydioxanone (PDO), trimethylene carbonate (TMC), copolymers or blends thereof. These fibers can also be made from any biocompatible materials based on natural polymers including silk and collagen-based materials. These fibers can also be made of any biocompatible fiber that is nonresorbable, such as, for example, polyethylene, polyethylene terephthalate, poly(tetrafluoroethylene), polycarbonate, polypropylene and poly(vinyl alcohol). In one embodiment, the fibers are formed from 95:5 copolymer of lactide and glycolide.
In another embodiment, the fibers that form the reinforcing material can be made of a bioabsorbable glass. Bioglass, a silicate containing calcium phosphate glass, or calcium phosphate glass with varying amounts of solid particles added to control resorption time are examples of materials that could be spun into glass fibers and used for the reinforcing material. Suitable solid particles that may be added include iron, magnesium, sodium, potassium, and combinations thereof.
The biocompatible scaffolds as well as the reinforcing material may also be formed from a thin, perforation-containing elastomeric sheet with pores or perforations to allow tissue ingrowth. Such a sheet could be made of blends or copolymers of polylactic acid (PLA), polyglycolic acid (PGA), polycaprolactone (PCL), and polydioxanone (PDO).
A person skilled in the art will appreciate that one or more layers of the reinforcing material may be used to reinforce the composite implant of the invention. In addition, biodegradable textile scaffolds, such as, for example, meshes, of the same structure and chemistry or different structures and chemistries can be overlaid on top of one another to fabricate biocompatible tissue implants with superior mechanical strength.
The source of viable tissue can also vary, and the tissue can have a variety of configurations. In one embodiment, however, the tissue is in the form of finely minced tissue fragments, which enhance the effectiveness of the regrowth and healing response. In another embodiment, the viable tissue can be in the form of a tissue slice or strip that harvested from healthy tissue that contains viable cells capable of tissue regeneration and/or remodeling, as described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/729,046 filed Dec. 5, 2003 and entitled “Viable Tissue Repair Implants and Methods of Use.” The tissue slice is preferably harvested to have a geometry that is suitable for implantation at the site of the injury or defect, and the harvested tissue slice is preferably dimensioned to allow the viable cells contained within the tissue slice to migrate out and proliferate and integrate with tissue surrounding the repair site.
Suitable tissue that can be used to obtain viable tissue includes, for example, cartilage tissue, meniscal tissue, ligament tissue, tendon tissue, skin tissue, bone tissue, muscle tissue, periosteal tissue, pericardial tissue, synovial tissue, nerve tissue, fat tissue, kidney tissue, bone marrow, liver tissue, bladder tissue, pancreas tissue, spleen tissue, intervertebral disc tissue, embryonic tissue, periodontal tissue, vascular tissue, blood, and combinations thereof. The tissue used to construct the tissue implant can be autogeneic tissue, allogeneic tissue, or xenogeneic tissue.
The particle size of each tissue fragment can also vary. By way of non-limiting example, the tissue size can be in the range of about 0.1 and 3 mm3, in the range of about 0.5 and 1 mm3, in the range of about 1 to 2 mm3, or in the range of about 2 to 3 mm3, but preferably the tissue particle is less than 1 mm3.
The viable tissue can also optionally be combined with a variety of other materials, including carriers, such as a gel-like carrier or an adhesive. By way of non-limiting example, the gel-like carrier can be a biological or synthetic hydrogel such as hyaluronic acid, fibrin glue, fibrin clot, collagen gel, collagen-based adhesive, alginate gel, crosslinked alginate, chitosan, synthetic acrylate-based gels, platelet rich plasma (PRP), platelet poor plasma (PPP), PRP clot, PPP clot, blood, blood clot, blood component, blood component clot, Matrigel, agarose, chitin, chitosan, polysaccharides, poly(oxyalkylene), a copolymer of poly(ethylene oxide)-poly(propylene oxide), poly(vinyl alcohol), laminin, elasti, proteoglycans, solubilized basement membrane, or combinations thereof. Suitable adhesives include, but are not limited to, hyaluronic acid, fibrin glue, fibrin clot, collagen gel, collagen-based adhesive, alginate gel, crosslinked alginate, gelatin-resorcin-formalin-based adhesive, mussel-based adhesive, dihydroxyphenylalanine (DOPA)-based adhesive, chitosan, transglutaminase, poly(amino acid)-based adhesive, cellulose-based adhesive, polysaccharide-based adhesive, synthetic acrylate-based adhesives, platelet rich plasma (PRP), platelet poor plasma (PPP), PRP clot, PPP clot, blood, blood clot, blood component, blood component clot, polyethylene glycol-based adhesive, Matrigel, Monostearoyl Glycerol co-Succinate (MGSA), Monostearoyl Glycerol co-Succinate/polyethylene glycol (MGSA/PEG) copolymers, laminin, elastin, proteoglycans, and combinations thereof.
The viable tissue can also be contacted with a matrix-digesting enzyme to facilitate tissue migration out of the extracellular matrix surrounding the viable tissue. The enzymes can be used to increase the rate of cell migration out of the extracellular matrix and into the tissue defect or injury, or scaffold material. Suitable matrix-digesting enzymes that can be used in the present invention include, but are not limited to, collagenase, chondroitinase, trypsin, elastase, hyaluronidase, peptidase, thermolysin, matrix metalloproteinase, gelatinase and protease. Preferably, the concentration of minced tissue particles in the gel-carrier is in the range of approximately 1 to 1000 mg/cm3, and more preferably in the range of about 1 to 200 mg/cm3.
Other viable tissue sources and methods for preparing viable tissues are disclosed in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/723,982 entitled “Conformable Tissue Repair Implant Capable Of Injection Delivery,” filed on Nov. 26, 2003 and incorporated by referenced herein in its entirety.
In use, the composite implant is preferably prepared by obtaining a viable tissue, preparing the tissue if necessary, and loading the tissue into the pocket(s) in the tissue scaffold. The tissue used to obtain viable tissue sample can vary. In an exemplary embodiment, however, the viable tissue is obtained from or includes finely minced tissue fragments which enhance the effectiveness of the regrowth and healing response. The minced tissue fragments can be obtained using any of a variety of conventional techniques, such as for example, by biopsy or other surgical removal. Preferably, the tissue sample is obtained during the repair surgery to minimize the total number of surgeries performed on the patient. Once a sample of living tissue has been obtained, the sample can then be processed under sterile conditions to create a suspension having at least one minced, or finely divided tissue particle. A carrier, such as a gel-like carrier or an adhesive, can optionally be used to form the suspension. It is also possible to harvest the tissue in minced form such that further processing is not necessary.
Once the viable tissue is prepared, the scaffold is loaded, and optionally sealed if necessary. The composite can then be implanted and retained at the defect site by the force of compression against the tissue implant by the surrounding tissue. For instance, the tissue implant can be dimensioned to have a slightly larger overall size than the area of the defect so that, upon implantation, the tissue implant can form a tight, interference fit within the defect. Alternatively, the tissue implant can be secured to the defect using any conventional method such as with a retaining element or an adhesive. The retaining element can be, for example, a fastener, staple, tissue tack, suture, adhesive, or any combination of these. One skilled in the art will appreciate that a variety of techniques can be used to attach the tissue implant to the surrounding tissue.
In another embodiment of the present invention, a bioactive agent may be incorporated within and/or applied to the tissue scaffolds, and/or it can be applied to the viable tissue. Preferably, the bioactive agent is incorporated within, or coated on, the scaffold prior to the addition of viable tissue to the scaffold. The bioactive agent(s) can be selected from among a variety of effectors that, when present at the site of injury, promote healing and/or regeneration of the affected tissue. In addition to being compounds or agents that actually promote or expedite healing, the effectors may also include compounds or agents that prevent infection (e.g., antimicrobial agents and antibiotics), compounds or agents that reduce inflammation (e.g., anti-inflammatory agents), compounds that prevent or minimize adhesion formation, such as oxidized regenerated cellulose (e.g., INTERCEED® and SURGICEL®, available from Ethicon, Inc.), hyaluronic acid, and compounds or agents that suppress the immune system (e.g., immunosuppressants).
By way of non-limiting example, other types of effectors present within the implant of the present invention can include heterologous or autologous growth factors, proteins (including matrix proteins), peptides, antibodies, enzymes, platelets, platelet rich plasma, glycoproteins, hormones, cytokines, glycosaminoglycans, nucleic acids, analgesics, viruses, virus particles, and cell types. It is understood that one or more effectors of the same or different functionality may be incorporated within the implant.
Examples of suitable effectors include the multitude of heterologous or autologous growth factors known to promote healing and/or regeneration of injured or damaged tissue. These growth factors can be incorporated directly into the scaffold, or alternatively, the scaffold can include a source of growth factors, such as for example, platelets. “Bioactive agents,” as used herein, can include one or more of the following: chemotactic agents; therapeutic agents (e.g., antibiotics, steroidal and non-steroidal analgesics and anti-inflammatories, anti-rejection agents such as immunosuppressants and anti-cancer drugs); various proteins (e.g., short term peptides, bone morphogenic proteins, glycoprotein and lipoprotein); cell attachment mediators; biologically active ligands; integrin binding sequence; ligands; various growth and/or differentiation agents and fragments thereof (e.g., epidermal growth factor (EGF), hepatocyte growth factor (HGF), vascular endothelial growth factors (VEGF), fibroblast growth factors (e.g., bFGF), platelet derived growth factors (PDGF), insulin derived growth factor (e.g., IGF-1, IGF-II) and transforming growth factors (e.g., TGF-β I-III), parathyroid hormone, parathyroid hormone related peptide, bone morphogenic proteins (e.g., BMP-2, BMP-4; BMP-6; BMP-12), sonic hedgehog, growth differentiation factors (e.g., GDF5, GDF6, GDF8), recombinant human growth factors (e.g., MP52), cartilage-derived morphogenic proteins (CDMP-1)); small molecules that affect the upregulation of specific growth factors; tenascin-C; hyaluronic acid; chondroitin sulfate; fibronectin; decorin; thromboelastin; thrombin-derived peptides; heparin-binding domains; heparin; heparan sulfate; DNA fragments and DNA plasmids. Suitable effectors likewise include the agonists and antagonists of the agents described above. The growth factor can also include combinations of the growth factors described above. In addition, the growth factor can be autologous growth factor that is supplied by platelets in the blood. In this case, the growth factor from platelets will be an undefined cocktail of various growth factors. If other such substances have therapeutic value in the orthopaedic field, it is anticipated that at least some of these substances will have use in the present invention, and such substances should be included in the meaning of “bioactive agent” and “bioactive agents” unless expressly limited otherwise.
Biologically derived agents, suitable for use as effectors, include one or more of the following: bone (autograft, allograft, and xenograft) and derivates of bone; cartilage (autograft, allograft and xenograft), including, for example, meniscal tissue, and derivatives; ligament (autograft, allograft and xenograft) and derivatives; derivatives of intestinal tissue (autograft, allograft and xenograft), including for example submucosa; derivatives of stomach tissue (autograft, allograft and xenograft), including for example submucosa; derivatives of bladder tissue (autograft, allograft and xenograft), including for example submucosa; derivatives of alimentary tissue (autograft, allograft and xenograft), including for example submucosa; derivatives of respiratory tissue (autograft, allograft and xenograft), including for example submucosa; derivatives of genital tissue (autograft, allograft and xenograft), including for example submucosa; derivatives of liver tissue (autograft, allograft and xenograft), including for example liver basement membrane; derivatives of skin tissue; platelet rich plasma (PRP), platelet poor plasma, bone marrow aspirate, demineralized bone matrix, insulin derived growth factor, whole blood, fibrin and blood clot. Purified ECM and other collagen sources are also appropriate biologically derived agents. If other such substances have therapeutic value in the orthopaedic field, it is anticipated that at least some of these substances will have use in the present invention, and such substances should be included in the meaning of “biologically derived agent” and “biologically derived agents” unless expressly limited otherwise.
Biologically derived agents also include bioremodelable collageneous tissue matrices. The terms “bioremodelable collageneous tissue matrix” and “naturally occurring bioremodelable collageneous tissue matrix” include matrices derived from native tissue selected from the group consisting of skin, artery, vein, pericardium, heart valve, dura mater, ligament, bone, cartilage, bladder, liver, stomach, fascia and intestine, whatever the source. Although the term “naturally occurring bioremodelable collageneous tissue matrix” is intended to refer to matrix material that has been cleaned, processed, sterilized, and optionally crosslinked, it is not within the definition of a naturally occurring bioremodelable collageneous tissue matrix to purify the natural fibers and reform a matrix material from purified natural fibers.
The proteins that may be present within the implant include proteins that are secreted from a cell or other biological source, such as for example, a platelet, which is housed within the implant, as well as those that are present within the implant in an isolated form. The isolated form of a protein typically is one that is about 55% or greater in purity, i.e., isolated from other cellular proteins, molecules, debris, etc. More preferably, the isolated protein is one that is at least 65% pure, and most preferably one that is at least about 75 to 95% pure. Notwithstanding the above, one of ordinary skill in the art will appreciate that proteins having a purity below about 55% are still considered to be within the scope of this invention. As used herein, the term “protein” embraces glycoproteins, lipoproteins, proteoglycans, peptides, and fragments thereof. Examples of proteins useful as effectors include, but are not limited to, pleiotrophin, endothelin, tenascin, fibronectin, fibrinogen, vitronectin, V-CAM, I-CAM, N-CAM, selectin, cadherin, integrin, laminin, actin, myosin, collagen, microfilament, intermediate filament, antibody, elastin, fibrillin, and fragments thereof.
Glycosaminoglycans, highly charged polysaccharides which play a role in cellular adhesion, may also serve as effectors according to the present invention. Exemplary glycosaminoglycans useful as effectors include, but are not limited to, heparan sulfate, heparin, chondroitin sulfate, dermatan sulfate, keratan sulfate, hyaluronan (also known as hyaluronic acid), and combinations thereof.
The tissue scaffolds of the present invention can also have cells incorporated therein. Suitable cell types that can serve as effectors according to this invention include, but are not limited to, osteocytes, osteoblasts, osteoclasts, fibroblasts, stem cells, pluripotent cells, chondrocyte progenitors, chondrocytes, endothelial cells, macrophages, leukocytes, adipocytes, monocytes, plasma cells, mast cells, umbilical cord cells, stromal cells, mesenchymal stem cells, epithelial cells, myoblasts, tenocytes, ligament fibroblasts, neurons, bone marrow cells, synoviocytes, embryonic stem cells; precursor cells derived from adipose tissue; peripheral blood progenitor cells; stem cells isolated from adult tissue; genetically transformed cells; a combination of chondrocytes and other cells; a combination of osteocytes and other cells; a combination of synoviocytes and other cells; a combination of bone marrow cells and other cells; a combination of mesenchymal cells and other cells; a combination of stromal cells and other cells; a combination of stem cells and other cells; a combination of embryonic stem cells and other cells; a combination of precursor cells isolated from adult tissue and other cells; a combination of peripheral blood progenitor cells and other cells; a combination of stem cells isolated from adult tissue and other cells; and a combination of genetically transformed cells and other cells. If other cells are found to have therapeutic value in the orthopaedic field, it is anticipated that at least some of these cells will have use in the present invention, and such cells should be included within the meaning of “cell” and “cells” unless expressly limited.
Cells typically have at their surface receptor molecules which are responsive to a cognate ligand (e.g., a stimulator). A stimulator is a ligand which when in contact with its cognate receptor induce the cell possessing the receptor to produce a specific biological action. For example, in response to a stimulator (or ligand) a cell may produce significant levels of secondary messengers, like Ca+2, which then will have subsequent effects upon cellular processes such as the phosphorylation of proteins, such as (keeping with our example) protein kinase C. In some instances, once a cell is stimulated with the proper stimulator, the cell secretes a cellular messenger usually in the form of a protein (including glycoproteins, proteoglycans, and lipoproteins). This cellular messenger can be an antibody (e.g., secreted from plasma cells), a hormone, (e.g., a paracrine, autocrine, or exocrine hormone), a cytokine, or natural or synthetic fragments thereof.
The tissue implants of the invention can also be used in gene therapy techniques in which nucleic acids, viruses, or virus particles deliver a gene of interest, which encodes at least one gene product of interest, to specific cells or cell types. Accordingly, the biological effector can be a nucleic acid (e.g., DNA, RNA, or an oligonucleotide), a virus, a virus particle, or a non-viral vector. The viruses and virus particles may be, or may be derived from, DNA or RNA viruses. The gene product of interest is preferably selected from the group consisting of proteins, polypeptides, interference ribonucleic acids (iRNA) and combinations thereof.
Once the applicable nucleic acids and/or viral agents (i.e., viruses or viral particles) are incorporated into the biocompatible scaffold of the tissue repair implant, the implant can then be implanted into a particular site to elicit a type of biological response. The nucleic acid or viral agent can then be taken up by the cells and any proteins that they encode can be produced locally by the cells. In one embodiment, the nucleic acid or viral agent can be taken up by the cells within the tissue fragment of the minced tissue suspension, or, in an alternative embodiment, the nucleic acid or viral agent can be taken up by the cells in the tissue surrounding the site of the injured tissue. One skilled in the art will recognize that the protein produced can be a protein of the type noted above, or a similar protein that facilitates an enhanced capacity of the tissue to heal an injury or a disease, combat an infection, or reduce an inflammatory response. Nucleic acids can also be used to block the expression of unwanted gene product that may impact negatively on a tissue repair process or other normal biological processes. DNA, RNA and viral agents are often used to accomplish such an expression blocking function, which is also known as gene expression knock out.
One of ordinary skill in the art will appreciate that the identity of the bioactive agent may be determined by a surgeon, based on principles of medical science and the applicable treatment objectives. It is understood that the bioactive agent or effector of the tissue repair implant can be incorporated within the tissue scaffold before or after manufacture of the tissue scaffold, or before or after the surgical placement of the implant.
Prior to surgical placement, the tissue scaffold can be placed in a suitable container comprising the bioactive agent. After an appropriate time and under suitable conditions, the scaffold will become impregnated with the bioactive agent. Alternatively, the bioactive agent can be incorporated within the scaffold by, for example, using an appropriately gauged syringe to inject the biological agent(s) into the scaffold. Other methods well known to those of skilled in the art can be applied in order to load a scaffold with an appropriate bioactive agent, such as mixing, pressing, spreading, centrifuging and placing the bioactive agent into the scaffold. Alternatively, the bioactive agent can be mixed with a gel-like carrier prior to injection into the scaffold.
Following surgical placement, an implant wherein the biocompatible scaffold is devoid of any bioactive agent can be infused with biological agent(s), or an implant wherein the scaffold includes at least one bioactive agent can be augmented with a supplemental quantity of the bioactive agent. One method of incorporating a bioactive agent within a surgically installed implant is by injection using an appropriately gauged syringe.
The amount of the bioactive agent included with a biocompatible scaffold will vary depending on a variety of factors, including the size of the scaffold, the material from which the scaffold is made, the porosity of the scaffold, the identity of the biologically component, and the intended purpose of the tissue repair implant. One skilled in the art can readily determine the appropriate quantity of bioactive agent to include within a biocompatible scaffold for a given application in order to facilitate and/or expedite the healing of tissue. The amount of bioactive agent will, of course, vary depending upon the identity of the bioactive agent and the given application.
The following non-limiting examples are illustrative of the principles and practice of this invention. Numerous additional embodiments within the scope and spirit of the invention will become apparent to those skilled in the art.
Cellular migration and new matrix formation of bovine minced meniscal tissue (BMT) into a small intestine submucosa (SIS) tissue scaffold was evaluated and compared. Meniscal tissue was harvested from the white and red-white zone of an adult bovine menisci, and the tissue was minced to form a viable tissue source. A scaffold was prepared from a small intestine submucosa (SIS), and a slit was made in the scaffold to form a pocket. The minced tissue was loaded at 20 mg/cm2 into the SIS scaffold through the slit to form a composite implant. The composite implant was placed in a pocket created in the hemithorax through one skin incision of a mouse. Tacking sutures of 5-0 Ethibond Excel® were used to tack the skin to musculature around each composite implant to prevent subcutaneous migration.
After 4 weeks, the composite implant was prepared for histological evaluation by fixing the implant in 10% buffered formalin, sectioning the implant to form samples, and staining the samples with Hematoxylin/Eosin (H/E). A photomicrograph of the composite implant is shown in
Cellular migration and new matrix formation of bovine minced meniscal tissue (BMT) into a small intestine submucosa (SIS) tissue scaffold was evaluated and compared. Meniscal tissue was harvested from the white and red-white zone of adult bovine menisci, and the tissue was minced to form a viable tissue source. A scaffold was prepared from a small intestine submucosa (SIS), and a slit was made in the scaffold to form a pocket. The minced tissue was combined with platelet rich plasma (PRP), and the composition was loaded into the SIS scaffold at 20 mg/cm2 through the slit to form a composite implant. The composite implant was placed in a pocket created in the hemithorax through one skin incision of a mouse. Tacking sutures of 5-0 Ethibond Excel® were used to tack the skin to musculature around each composite implant to prevent subcutaneous migration.
After 4 weeks, the composite implant was prepared for histological evaluation by fixing the implant in 10% buffered formalin, sectioning the implant to form samples, and staining the samples with Hematoxylin/Eosin (H/E). A photomicrograph of the composite implant is shown in
Cellular migration and new matrix formation of bovine minced meniscal tissue (BMT) into a small intestine submucosa (SIS) tissue scaffold was evaluated and compared. Meniscal tissue was harvested from the white and red-white zone of adult bovine menisci, and the tissue was minced. PRP was added to the minced BMT. A viable tissue source was then prepared by combining the BMT and PRP with a bioresorbable polymer scaffold (referred to as “FPV”) in a 50:50 ratio. The resorbable scaffold used was a lyophilized foam scaffold (65% polyglycolic acid/35% Polycaprolactone) reinforced with nonwoven fibers (mixture of PDS[Polydioxanone] and Vicryl). A scaffold was prepared from a small intestine submucosa (SIS), and a slit was made in the scaffold to form a pocket. The viable tissue source of FPV, BMT, and PRP was loaded at 20 mg/cm2 into the SIS scaffold through the slit to form a composite implant. The composite implant was placed in a pocket created in the hemithorax through one skin incision of a mouse. Tacking sutures of 5-0 Ethibond Excel® were used to tack the skin to musculature around each composite implant to prevent subcutaneous migration.
After 4 weeks, the composite implant was prepared for histological evaluation by fixing the implant in 10% buffered formalin, sectioning the implant to form samples, and staining the samples with Hematoxylin/Eosin (H/E). A photomicrograph of the composite implant is shown in
Cellular migration and new matrix formation of bovine cartilage tissue (BCT) into a small intestine submucosa (SIS) tissue scaffold was evaluated and compared. Cartilage tissue was harvested from the femoral condyles of adult bovine animals, and the tissue was minced. PRP was added to the minced BCT. A viable tissue source was then prepared by combining the BCT and PRP with a bioresorbable polymer scaffold (referred to as “PV”) in a 50:50 ratio. The resorbable scaffold used was a nonwoven scaffold (mixture of PDS[Polydioxanone] and Vicryl). A scaffold was prepared from a small intestine submucosa (SIS), and a slit was made in the scaffold to form a pocket. The viable tissue source of PV, BCT, and PRP was loaded at 20 mg/cm2 into the SIS scaffold through the slit to form a composite implant. The composite implant was placed in a pocket created in the hemithorax through one skin incision of a mouse. Tacking sutures of 5-0 Ethibond Excel® were used to tack the skin to musculature around each composite implant to prevent subcutaneous migration.
After 4 weeks, the composite implant was prepared for histological evaluation by fixing the implant in 10% buffered formalin, sectioning the implant to form samples, and staining the samples with Hematoxylin/Eosin (H/E). A photomicrograph of the composite implant is shown in
The effect of using a bioactive substance on native meniscal cell migration into a tissue scaffold was evaluated. Menisci were harvested from bovine knees and 4 mm explants were taken from the white and red/white regions. A 2 mm punch biopsy was removed from the center of the explants prior to scaffold insertion. Bioresorbable foam scaffolds (60% Polylactic acid and 40% Polycaprolactone), 2 mm in diameter, were treated either with blood, Platelet Rich Plasma (PRP), or 8 times concentrated PRP, and they were inserted in the center of the explants. The explants with scaffolds were cultured for 2 and 3 weeks under standard cell culture conditions with changes in media occurring every other day. At 2 and 3 weeks, the scaffolds within the explants were removed and cell number was estimated by quantitation of DNA using the CyQuant assay.
The effect of using a bioactive substance on native cell migration into a tissue scaffold was evaluated. Menisci were harvested from bovine knees and 4 mm explants were taken from the white and red/white regions. A 2 mm punch biopsy was removed from the center of the explants prior to scaffold insertion. Bioresorbable foam scaffolds (65% Polyglycolic acid and 35% Polycaprolactone), reinforced with PDS, (Polydioxanone) mesh, 2 mm in diameter, were soaked in 100 μl of CDMP-1 at the concentrations of 10 ng/ml, 100 ng/ml and 300 ng/ml. Scaffolds were lyophilized overnight, such that the growth factor was lyophilized in the scaffold and then inserted in the center of the explants The explants with scaffolds were cultured for 3 weeks under standard cell culture conditions with changes in media occurring every other day. At 2 and 3 weeks, the scaffolds within the explants were removed and cell number estimated by quantitation of DNA using the CyQuant assay.
The effect of using a bioactive substance on native cell migration into a tissue scaffold was evaluated. Menisci were harvested from bovine knees and 4 mm explants were taken from the white and red/white regions. A 2 mm punch biopsy was removed from the center of the explants prior to scaffold insertion. Bioresorbable foam scaffolds (65% Polyglycolic acid and 35% Polycaprolactone), reinforced with PDS, (Polydioxanone) mesh, 2 mm in diameter, were soaked in 100 μl of CDMP-1 at the concentrations of 150 ng/ml. Scaffolds were lyophilized overnight, such that the growth factor was lyophilized in the scaffold and then inserted in the center of the explants The explants with scaffolds were cultured for 3 weeks under standard cell culture conditions with changes in media occurring every other day. At 3 weeks, the explants were removed and processed histology for staining with Hematoxylin/Eosin (H/E).
One skilled in the art will appreciate further features and advantages of the invention based on the above-described embodiments. Accordingly, the invention is not to be limited by what has been particularly shown and described, except as indicated by the appended claims. All publications and references cited herein are expressly incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3272204 | Artandi | Sep 1966 | A |
3562820 | Braun | Feb 1971 | A |
3739402 | Cooley et al. | Jun 1973 | A |
3812017 | Santangelo et al. | May 1974 | A |
3857932 | Shepard et al. | Dec 1974 | A |
4045418 | Sinclair | Aug 1977 | A |
4057537 | Sinclair | Nov 1977 | A |
4105034 | Shalaby et al. | Aug 1978 | A |
4130639 | Shalaby et al. | Dec 1978 | A |
4130689 | Costa, Jr. | Dec 1978 | A |
4140678 | Shalaby et al. | Feb 1979 | A |
4141087 | Shalaby et al. | Feb 1979 | A |
4205399 | Shalaby et al. | Jun 1980 | A |
4208511 | Shalaby et al. | Jun 1980 | A |
4344193 | Kenny | Aug 1982 | A |
4520821 | Schmidt et al. | Jun 1985 | A |
4553272 | Mears | Nov 1985 | A |
4585458 | Kurland | Apr 1986 | A |
4597766 | Hilal et al. | Jul 1986 | A |
4609551 | Caplan et al. | Sep 1986 | A |
4728329 | Mansat et al. | Mar 1988 | A |
4801299 | Brendel et al. | Jan 1989 | A |
4837285 | Berg et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
4902508 | Badylak et al. | Feb 1990 | A |
4917700 | Kins | Apr 1990 | A |
4946377 | Kovach | Aug 1990 | A |
5007934 | Stone | Apr 1991 | A |
5041138 | Vacant et al. | Aug 1991 | A |
5053050 | Itay | Oct 1991 | A |
5061281 | Mares et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5078744 | Chvapil | Jan 1992 | A |
5108807 | Tucker | Apr 1992 | A |
5108989 | Amento et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
5147400 | Kaplan et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5176708 | Frey et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5206023 | Hunziker | Apr 1993 | A |
5258028 | Ersek et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5263984 | Li et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5290494 | Coombes et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5306311 | Stone | Apr 1994 | A |
5320624 | Kaplan et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5320646 | Patton et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5326357 | Kandel | Jul 1994 | A |
5366756 | Chesterfield et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5393594 | Koyfman et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5425766 | Bowaid | Jun 1995 | A |
5443950 | Naughton et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5445833 | Badylak et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5455041 | Genco et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5464929 | Bezwada et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5468253 | Bezwada et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5480827 | Guillemin et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5487897 | Polson et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5514181 | Light et al. | May 1996 | A |
5514378 | Mikos et al. | May 1996 | A |
5571189 | Kuslich | Nov 1996 | A |
5577517 | Bonutti | Nov 1996 | A |
5589176 | Seare, Jr. | Dec 1996 | A |
5595751 | Bezwada et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5597579 | Bezwada et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5607687 | Bezwada et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5612028 | Sackier et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5618552 | Bezwada et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5620698 | Bezwada et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5624463 | Stone et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5626611 | Liu et al. | May 1997 | A |
5632745 | Schwartz | May 1997 | A |
5634879 | Mueller-Glauser et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5645850 | Bezwada et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5648088 | Bezwada et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5654135 | Tinois et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5656492 | Giowacke et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5677355 | Shalaby et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5681353 | Li et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5697976 | Chesterfield et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5698213 | Jamiolkowski et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5700583 | Jamiolkowski et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5705181 | Cooper et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5709854 | Griffith-Cima et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5711960 | Shikinami | Jan 1998 | A |
5713920 | Bezwada et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5720969 | Gentile et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5723331 | Tubo et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5735903 | Li et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5736372 | Vacanti et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5755791 | Whitson et al. | May 1998 | A |
5759190 | Vibe-Hansen et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5766631 | Arnold | Jun 1998 | A |
5769897 | Harle | Jun 1998 | A |
5769899 | Schwartz et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5782914 | Schankereli | Jul 1998 | A |
5786217 | Tubo et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5800537 | Bell | Sep 1998 | A |
5800543 | McLeod et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5830493 | Yokota et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5837235 | Mueller et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5837278 | Geistlich et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5842477 | Naughton et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5855608 | Brekke et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5859150 | Jamiolkowski et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5865849 | Stone | Feb 1999 | A |
5891558 | Bell et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5902741 | Purchio et al. | May 1999 | A |
5904716 | Gendler | May 1999 | A |
5904717 | Brekke et al. | May 1999 | A |
5914121 | Robey et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5922025 | Hubbard | Jul 1999 | A |
5964805 | Stone | Oct 1999 | A |
5968096 | Whitson et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5980889 | Butler et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5989269 | Vibe-Hanen et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5990194 | Dunn et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5990378 | Ellis | Nov 1999 | A |
6001352 | Boyan et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6001394 | Daculsi et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6005161 | Brekke et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6008433 | Stone | Dec 1999 | A |
6027742 | Lee et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6042534 | Gellman et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6042610 | Li et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6054122 | MacPhee et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6077989 | Kandel et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6080579 | Hanley, Jr. et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6096532 | Armstrong et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6103255 | Levene et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6110209 | Stone | Aug 2000 | A |
6110212 | Gregory | Aug 2000 | A |
6113640 | Tormala et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6117166 | Winston et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6120514 | Vibe-Hansen et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6121042 | Peterson et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6123727 | Vacanti et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6132463 | Lee et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6132468 | Mansmann | Oct 2000 | A |
6139578 | Lee et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6140039 | Naughton et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6143293 | Weiss et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6147135 | Yuan et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6153292 | Bell et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6156068 | Walter et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6165217 | Hayes | Dec 2000 | A |
6171338 | Talja et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6176880 | Plouhar et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6179840 | Bowman | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6179872 | Bell et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6180007 | Gentile et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6183737 | Zaleske et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6187053 | Minuth | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6187329 | Agrawal et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6197061 | Masuda et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6197325 | MacPhee et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6200606 | Peterson | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6214045 | Corbitt, Jr. et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6214055 | Simionescu et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6242247 | Rieser et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6251673 | Winkler | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6277151 | Lee et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6283980 | Vibe-Hansen et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6287316 | Agarwal et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6287340 | Altman et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6291240 | Mansbridge et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6306177 | Felt et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6306424 | Vyakarnam et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6316692 | Readhead et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6319712 | Meenen et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6328765 | Hardwick et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6331312 | Lee et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6333029 | Vyakarnam et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6365149 | Vyakarnam et al. | Apr 2002 | B2 |
6378527 | Hungerford et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6378572 | Neubauer et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6379367 | Vibe-Hansen et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6464729 | Kandel | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6485723 | Badylak et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6489165 | Bhatnagar et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6503278 | Pohjonen et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6511511 | Slivka et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6511958 | Atkinson et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6521430 | Orwar et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6530956 | Mansmann | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6534084 | Vyakarnam et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6541024 | Kadiyala et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6551355 | Lewandrowski et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6569172 | Asculai et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6592588 | Bobic et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6599323 | Melican et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6605294 | Sawhney | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6626950 | Brown et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6652450 | Neisz et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6652585 | Lange | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6727224 | Zhang et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6773458 | Brauker et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6783712 | Slivka et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6840962 | Vacanti et al. | Jan 2005 | B1 |
6852330 | Bowman et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6866681 | Laboureau et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6884428 | Binette et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6886568 | Frondoza et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6886569 | Chervitz et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6902932 | Altman et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
7109034 | Orwar et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7208177 | Geistlich et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7262020 | Hellerstein | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7316822 | Binette et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7368124 | Chun et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7456012 | Ryttsen et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7799089 | Plouhar et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7824701 | Binette et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7875296 | Binette et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7901461 | Harmon et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
8137686 | Kladakis et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8137702 | Binette et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8197837 | Jamiolkowski et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8221780 | Dhanaraj et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8226715 | Hwang et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8496970 | Binette et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8637066 | Binnette et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8641775 | Harmon et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8691259 | Bowman et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8895045 | Jamiolkowski et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
9211362 | Hwang et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9511171 | Binette et al. | Dec 2016 | B2 |
10583220 | Binette et al. | Mar 2020 | B2 |
10603408 | Binette et al. | Mar 2020 | B2 |
20010014475 | Frondoza et al. | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20010016353 | Janas et al. | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20010016772 | Lee et al. | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20010023373 | Plouhar et al. | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20010033857 | Vyakarnam et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010038848 | Donda et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010039453 | Gresser et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010051834 | Frondoza et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20010053353 | Griffith et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20010053839 | Noishiki et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020006428 | Mahmood et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020009477 | Mahmood et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020009805 | Nevo et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020009806 | Hicks, Jr. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020013627 | Geistlich et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020015719 | Kellner et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020022883 | Burg | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020022884 | Mansmann | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020028192 | Dimitrijevich et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020029055 | Bonutti | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020062151 | Altman et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020082631 | Bonutti | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020083479 | Winston et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020091403 | Bonutti | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020091406 | Bonutti | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020099401 | Bonutti | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020099448 | Hiles et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020107570 | Sybert et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020119177 | Bowman et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020120348 | Melican et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020123750 | Eisermann et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020127265 | Bowman et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020133229 | Laurencin et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020133235 | Hungerford et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020150604 | Yi et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020151975 | Farr et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020173558 | Williams et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020176893 | Wironen et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020177224 | Madry et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030003153 | Asculai et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030004578 | Brown et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030012805 | Chen et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030023316 | Brown et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030026787 | Fearnot et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030027332 | Lafrance et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030033021 | Plouhar et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030033022 | Plouhar et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030036797 | Malaviya et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030036801 | Schwartz et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030045937 | Ginn | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030050709 | Noth et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030064917 | Crawford et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030075822 | Slivka et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030077311 | Vyakarnam et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030078617 | Schwartz et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030147935 | Binette et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030193104 | Melican et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040024457 | Boyce et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040033212 | Thomson | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040059416 | Murray et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040078077 | Binette et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040078090 | Binette et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040175408 | Chun et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040219182 | Gomes et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040236424 | Berez et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040249457 | Smith et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040267088 | Kammerer | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040267362 | Hwang et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050002915 | Atala et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050038520 | Binette et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050048651 | Ryttsen et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050113937 | Binette et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050113938 | Jamiolkowski et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050125077 | Harmon et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050147645 | Budny | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050232967 | Kladakis et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050234549 | Kladakis et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20060067967 | Bowman | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060084930 | Dhanaraj et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060204439 | Hellerstein | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060223177 | Harris et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060280768 | Hwang et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060293760 | DeDeyne | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070031470 | Kladakis et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070036767 | Mistry et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070250177 | Bilbo | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20080039955 | Hunziker | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080071385 | Binette et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080226870 | Sypeck et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080241213 | Chun et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20110009963 | Binette et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110091517 | Binette et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110097381 | Binette et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110110958 | Qiu et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110177134 | Harmon et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20120156265 | Binette et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120165939 | Kladakis et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120253464 | Hwang et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20130123937 | Jamiolkowski et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20170049931 | Binette et al. | Feb 2017 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
717552 | Mar 1998 | AU |
2247158 | Aug 1997 | CA |
19812195 | Sep 1999 | DE |
0145492 | Jun 1985 | EP |
0 274 898 | Jul 1988 | EP |
0277678 | Aug 1988 | EP |
0 411 545 | Feb 1991 | EP |
0 466 105 | Jan 1992 | EP |
0464163 | Jan 1992 | EP |
0 485 215 | May 1992 | EP |
0 562 864 | Sep 1993 | EP |
0 570 331 | Sep 1997 | EP |
0955024 | Nov 1999 | EP |
1 027 897 | Aug 2000 | EP |
1 064 958 | Jan 2001 | EP |
1 074 270 | Feb 2001 | EP |
1 167 517 | Jan 2002 | EP |
1177800 | Feb 2002 | EP |
1 216 717 | Jun 2002 | EP |
1216 718 | Jun 2002 | EP |
1 348 451 | Oct 2003 | EP |
1 410 811 | Apr 2004 | EP |
1405649 | Apr 2004 | EP |
1 506 790 | Feb 2005 | EP |
1537839 | Jun 2005 | EP |
1604622 | Dec 2005 | EP |
2688690 | Sep 1993 | FR |
1008193 | Oct 1965 | GB |
63-203154 | Aug 1988 | JP |
63-203154 | Aug 1988 | JP |
02-052648 | Feb 1990 | JP |
2143945 | Dec 1990 | JP |
19900227442 | Apr 1992 | JP |
19900256824 | May 1992 | JP |
19910261753 | Jul 1993 | JP |
19920094329 | Nov 1993 | JP |
10234844 | Sep 1998 | JP |
11-319068 | Nov 1999 | JP |
19980129048 | Nov 1999 | JP |
19980319783 | May 2000 | JP |
2001129073 | May 2001 | JP |
2002-527402 | Aug 2002 | JP |
2002-535378 | Oct 2002 | JP |
2003320008 | Nov 2003 | JP |
2004008437 | Jan 2004 | JP |
20020165345 | Jan 2004 | JP |
2004-195103 | Jul 2004 | JP |
2005-237476 | Sep 2005 | JP |
2187261 | Aug 2002 | RU |
1535542 | Jan 1990 | SU |
WO 8600533 | Jan 1986 | WO |
9206179 | Apr 1992 | WO |
9302718 | Feb 1993 | WO |
9311805 | Jun 1993 | WO |
WO 9533821 | Dec 1995 | WO |
9608277 | Mar 1996 | WO |
WO 9730662 | Aug 1997 | WO |
9746665 | Dec 1997 | WO |
WO 9848860 | Nov 1998 | WO |
9853768 | Dec 1998 | WO |
9905992 | Feb 1999 | WO |
WO 9916381 | Apr 1999 | WO |
9939724 | Aug 1999 | WO |
9947097 | Sep 1999 | WO |
9959647 | Nov 1999 | WO |
0015248 | Mar 2000 | WO |
0016381 | Mar 2000 | WO |
0069355 | Nov 2000 | WO |
0072782 | Dec 2000 | WO |
0074741 | Dec 2000 | WO |
WO 0115753 | Mar 2001 | WO |
0134065 | May 2001 | WO |
WO 0185226 | Nov 2001 | WO |
0205750 | Jan 2002 | WO |
2002000272 | Jan 2002 | WO |
WO 0230324 | Apr 2002 | WO |
02062357 | Aug 2002 | WO |
02074356 | Sep 2002 | WO |
02096268 | Dec 2002 | WO |
03007784 | Jan 2003 | WO |
03007786 | Jan 2003 | WO |
03007787 | Jan 2003 | WO |
03007788 | Jan 2003 | WO |
03007790 | Jan 2003 | WO |
03007805 | Jan 2003 | WO |
03007839 | Jan 2003 | WO |
03007847 | Jan 2003 | WO |
03007789 | Jan 2003 | WO |
WO 03017826 | Mar 2003 | WO |
03043674 | May 2003 | WO |
2004012782 | Feb 2004 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Bonisch, M., et al. “Septumredonstrucktion mit PDS-Folie” HNO 47: 1999 pp. 546-550. |
Eckersberger, M.D., Franz, “Circumferential tracheal replacement with costal cartilage”, The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 1987:94: pp. 175-180. |
Matsuo, M.D., Kiyoshi et al., “Semiquantitative Correction of Posttraumatic Enophthalmos with Sliced Cartilage Grafts” Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, vol. 83, No. 3, Postraumatic Enophthalmos, pp. 429-437. |
Megumi, M.D., Yoshikazu, “Augmentation Rhinoplasty with Soft Tissue and Cartilage” Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, 1988, pp. 89-933. |
Papadopulos, M.D., Angel, “Compound Implant to Projedt the Nasal Tip” Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, 1987, pp. 181-185. |
Partial European Search Report, for EP 04 25 7515, dated May 9, 2005. |
Powers, Dennis L. et al., “A cartilagenous graft as an adjunct to finger joint implant arthroplasty” Journal of Biomedical Materials Research, vol. 19, 1985 pp. 509-518. |
Rohrbach, Jens Martin et al., “Biological Corneal Replacement—Alternative to Keratoplasty and Keratoprosthesis? A Pilot Study with Heterologous Hyaline Cartilage in the Rabbit Model”, Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd 207, 1995; pp. 191-196. |
Trenite, M.D., G.J. Nolst et al., “Reimplantation of autologous septal cartilage in the growing nasal septum”, Rhinology, 25, 1987, pp. 225-236. |
Albrecht et al., “Closure of Osteochondral Lesions Using Chondral Fragments and Fibrin Adhesive,” Arch. Ortho{dot over (p)}. Trauma Surg. 101: 213-217 (1983). |
Albrecht, F.H., “The Closure of Joint Cartilage Defects by Means of Cartilage Fragments and Fibrin Adhesive,” Fortschr. Med. 101(37):1650-52 (1983). |
Caterson EJ., et al. “Three-Dimensional Cartilage Formation by Bone Marrow-Derived Cells Seeded in Polylactide/Alginate Amalgam,” J Biomed Mater Res. 57(3):394-403 (2001) *(Abstract Only). |
Deuel, T. et al., “Growth Factors in Principles of Tissue Engineering,” Second Edition, Academic Press pp. 129-141 (2000). |
European Search Report, for EP 03 25 6522, dated Feb. 24, 2004. |
Frenkel, S, Ph.D. and Paul E. Di Cesare, M.D., “Degradation and Repair of Articular Cartilage,” Frontiers in Bioscience, 4th ed., pp. 671-685, pp. 1-32 (Oct. 15, 1999). |
Gooch, K. et al., “Mechanical Forces and Growth Factors Utilized in Tissue Engineering Frontier in Tissue Engineering,” Pergamon Chapter II.3, pp. 61-82 (1998). |
Grigolo, B., et al. “Transplantation of Chondrocytes Seeded on a Hyaluronan Derivative (hyaff-11) into Cartilage Defects in Rabbits,” Biomaterials 22(17):2417-2424 (2001) *(Abstract Only). |
Hutmacher DW., “Scaffold Design and Fabrication Technologies for Engineering Tissues-State of the Art and Future Prospectives”, J Biomater Sci Polym Ed, 12(1):107-124 (2001) *(Abstract Only). |
Hutmacher DW., “Scaffolds in Tissue Engineering Bone and Cartilage”, Biomaterials, 21(24):2529-2543 (2000) *(Abstract Only). |
Ibarra, C. M.D. et al. “Tissue-Engineered Meniscus—Cells and Matrix”, Tissue Engineering in Orthopedic Surgery 31(3):411-418 (Jul. 2000). |
Koski, J. M.D. et al., “Meniscal Injury and Repair”, Orthopedic Clinics of North American, 31(3):419-435 (Jul. 2000). |
Koski, J. M.D. et al., “Tissue-Engineered Ligament—Cells, Matrix, and Growth Factors” Tissue Engineering in Orthopedic Surgery, 31(3):437-452 (Jul. 2000). |
Murray, M., et al. “The Migration of Cells from the Ruptured Human Anterior Cruciate Ligament into Collagen-Glycosaminoglycan Regeneration Templates in Vitro,” Biomaterials 22:2393-2402 (2001). |
Radice, M. “Hyaluronan-Based Biopolymers as delivery vehicles for Bone-Marrow-Derived Mesenchymal Progenitors”, J Biomed Mater Res. 50(2):101-9 (2000) *(Abstract Only). |
Rossi, et al., “Embryonic Purkinje Cells Grafted on the Surface of the Cerebellar Cortex Integrate in the Adult Unlesioned Cerebellum,” EP J. Neuroscience 4:589-93 (1992). |
Sampath, T. K., et al. “In Vitro Transformation of Mesenchymal Cells Derived From Embryonic Muscle Into Cartilage in Response to Extracellular Matrix Components of Bone,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Science of the USA, 81(1): 3419-3423 (Jun. 1984). |
Schreiber RE., et al. “A Method for Tissue Engineering of cartilage by Cell Seeding on Bioresorbable Scaffolds,” Ann NY Acad Sci. 875:394-404 (1999) *(Abstract Only). |
Stone, K. et al. “Meniscal Regeneration with Copolymeric Collagen Scaffolds,” American Journal of Sports Medicine 20(2):104-111 (1992). |
Van Susante JLC, et al. “Linkage of Chondroitin-Sulfate to Type I Collagen Scaffolds Stimulates the Bioactivity of Seeded Chondrocytes in Vitro”, Biomaterials 22(17):2359-2369 (2001) *(Abstract Only). |
Japanese Office Action dated Aug. 28, 2012 for Application No. 2004-233655 (6 Pages). |
Takeuchi et al., The present situation and vision of joint transplantation. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medicine. 1995;164(10):748-9. Translation. |
Andreasen et al., Evaluation of different types of autotransplanted connective tissues as potential periodontal ligamant substitues: An experimental replantation study in monkeys. International Journal of Oral Surgery, Jun. 1981, vol. 10, Issue 3, pp. 189-201. |
Japanese Office Action dated Dec. 6, 2011 for Application No. 2004-233655 (8 Pages). |
Australian Search Report for AU application No. 2006200194, dated Feb. 4, 2008. |
Dialog English language abstract for DE 19812195. |
Examination file history of EP 01310810. |
www.btc-bti.com/applications/cryogenicstorage.htm, 6 pgs, printed Jan. 11, 2010. |
www.bio-medicine.org/medicine-technology-1/New-Study-Shows-Cloning-From-Dried-Cells-Now-Possible-2988-1/, 2 pgs, printed Jan. 11, 2010. |
Japanese Office Action, from JP 2004-191861, dated Mar. 1, 2011. |
Andreasen, J.O. et al. Evaluation of different types of autotransplanted connective tissues as potential periodontal ligamant substitues: An experimental replantation study in monkeys, International Journal of Oral Surgery, Jun. 1981, vol. 10, Issue 3, pp. 189-201 (Abstract only). |
European Search Report for EP 10075307 dated Oct. 6, 2010. |
Chen G., Ushida T., and Tateishi T., “A hybrid network of synthetic polymer mesh and collagen sponge,” Chem. Commun., 2000, pp. 1505-1506. |
European Search Report for EP 08075114.2, dated May 12, 2010. |
Heller: “Handbook of Biodegradable Polymers,” 1997, Hardwood Academic Press, pp. 99-118. |
Solov'ev et al., “Functional Activity of Hepatocytes in Liver Fragments In Vitro as a Function if Fragment Size and Duration of Culturing” Bull Exp Biol Med. Jun. 2000;129(6):595-7. |
Boland et. al., J. Macromol. Sci.-Pure Appl. Chem., 2001, A38(12), p. 1231-1243). |
Buschmann et al., J. Orthop. Res. 1992; 10:745-752. |
De Groot, J.H. et al., “Meniscal tissue regeneration in porous 50/50 copoly(l-lactide/epsilon-caprolactone) implants” Biomaterials, vol. 18, No. 8, 1997, pp. 613-622. |
De Groot, J.H. et al., “Use of porous polyurethanes for meniscal reconstruction and meniscal prostheses” Biomaterials, vol. 17, No. 2, 1996, pp. 163-173. |
European Search Report, for EP Application No. 07252617.1, dated Nov. 2, 2007. |
Young, A.T., “Microcellular Foams via Phase Separation,” J. Vac. Sci. Technolol., vol. 4(3), May/Jun. 1986. |
Spaans et al. “Solvent-free fabrication of micro-porous polyurethane amide and polyurethane-urea scaffolds for repair and replacement of the knee joint meniscus” Journal of Biomaterials, vol. 21, No. 23, 2000, pp. 2453-2460. |
Tienen T. G. et al., “A porous polymer scaffold for meniscal lesion repair-A study in dogs” Biomaterials, vol. 24, No. 14, 2003, pp. 2541-2548. |
Nioshiki Y., “A new trend in hybrid artificial organs” J. Artificial Organs, 1999, vol. 2: pp. 93-96. |
Tozum et al., J Canadian Dental Assoc. Nov. 2003. 69(10):664-664h. |
Kemnitzer and Kohn, in the Handbook of Biodegradable Polymers, edited by Domb, et. al., Hardwood Academic Press, pp. 251-272 (1997). |
Journal of Biomaterials Research, vol. 22, pp. 993-1009, 1988 by Cohn and Younes. |
Cohn, Polymer Preprints (ACS Division of Polymer Chemistry), vol. 30(1), p. 498, 1989. |
Allcock in the Encyclopedia of Polymer Science, vol. 13, pp. 31-41, Wiley Intersciences, John Wiley & Sons, 1988. |
Vandorpe, et al in the Handbook of Biodegradable Polymers, edited by Domb, et al., Hardwood Academic Press, pp. 161-182 (1997). |
Kurashina, K. et al. “Osteogenesis in muscle with composite graft of hydroxyapatite and autogenous calvarial periosteum: a preliminary report” Biomaterials (1995) vol. 16, No. 2, pp. 119-123. |
Ikada, Yoshito, Handbook of Fiber Science and Technology, Edited by Menachem Lewin, Jack Preston, vol. III, Part B, Chapters, pp. 253, 289-295, Published by M. Dekker, 1983. |
(7th Edition, 1999). |
Defrere et al., “Teflon/polyurethane arthroplasty of the knee: the first 2 years preliminary clinical experience in a new concept of artificial resurfacing of full thickness cartilage legions of the knee,” Acta Chir. Belg., 1992, vol. 92, No. 5, pp. 217-227. |
Dialog English language abstract for DE 19812195, published Sep. 30, 1999. |
Japanese Office Action dated Apr. 24, 2012 for Application No. 2007-171032 (6 Pages). |
Japanese Office Action dated Feb. 26, 2013 for Application No. 2007-171032 (4 Pages). |
Lobler et al., Biomaterial implants induce the inflammation marker CPR at the site of implantation, Journal of Biomedical Materials Research, 2002, vol. 61, No. 1, pp. 165-167. |
Guy Fortier, Development of Biosensors Based on Immobilization of Enzymes in Eastman AQ Polymer Coated with a Layer of Nation, Analytical Letters, vol. 23 No. 9, Sep. 1990. Abstract. |
European Search Report for Application No. 05256123, dated Feb. 1, 2006. |
European Search Report for Application No. 04251265.7 dated Jul. 9, 2004. |
[No author listed] Warm Glass Disclosure “The Basic Fusing and Slumping Process.” 1999. Retrieved from the internet Nov. 22, 2005, 5 pages. |
O'Driscoll S.W. et al., “Viability of Periosteal Tissue Obtained Postmortem,” Cell Transplantation, 1999, col. 8, pp. 611-616. |
Bruns J. et al., “The in vitro influence of different culture conditions on the potential of sheep rib perichondrium to form hyaline-like cartilage: Evaluation of glueing materials used for in vivo graft fixation,” Virchows Archiv., 1994, vol. 424, pp. 169-175. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20050177249 A1 | Aug 2005 | US |