This disclosure relates to a system and method for providing packet flow management in a communication network.
Wireless communication systems and networks are used in connection with many applications, including, for example, satellite communications systems, portable digital assistants (PDAs), laptop computers, and cellular telephones. One significant benefit that users of such applications obtain is the ability to connect to a network (e.g., the Internet) as long as the user is within range of such a wireless communication system.
Current wireless communication systems use either, or a combination of, circuit switching and packet switching in order to provide mobile data services to a mobile node. A mobile node can be a cell phone, a PDA, a Blackberry, a laptop computer with a wireless card, or any other wireless device. Generally speaking, with circuit-based approaches, wireless data is carried by a dedicated (and uninterrupted) connection between the sender and recipient of data using a physical switching path. Once the direct connection is setup, it is maintained for as long as the sender and receiver have data to exchange. The establishment of such a direct and dedicated switching path results in a fixed share of network resources being tied up until the connection is closed. When the physical connection between the sender and the receiver is no longer desired, it is torn-down and the network resources are allocated to other users as necessary.
Packet-based approaches, on the other hand, do not permanently assign transmission resources to a given call, and do not require the setup and teardown of physical connections between a sender and receiver of data. In general, a data flow in packet-based approaches is “packetized,” where the data is divided into separate segments of information, and each segment receives “header” information that may provide, for example, source information, destination information, information regarding the number of bits in the packet, priority information, and security information. The packets are then routed to a destination independently based on the header information. The packet flow may include a number of packets or a single packet. Services may be applied to a packet flow such as lawful interception (wire tapping), Virtual Private Networks (VPNs), and firewalls.
A part of the evolution of packet based communications has been the development of IP Multimedia Subsystem (IMS). IMS is an architectural framework for delivering internet protocol (IP) multimedia to mobile nodes. A call session control function (CSCF) can manage much of the signaling that occurs in an IMS core. The CSCF functionality can be logically divided into three functionalities: a Proxy-CSCF (P-CSCF), an Interrogating CSCF (I-CSCF), and a Serving CSCF (S-CSCF). Additionally, the CSCF functionality is envisioned by two different groups for inclusion in two different topologies: Global System for Mobile Communications (GSM) and CDMA 2000. The 3rd Generation Partnership Project (3GPP) is responsible for IMS which works with GSM systems and the 3rd Generation Partnership Project 2 (3GPP2) is responsible for Multimedia Domain (MMD) which is used with CDMA systems and is based on the 3GPP IMS concept. With both IMS and MMD, several different functions are described and problems can arise if packet flows are not managed among the functions.
Systems and methods for providing packet flow management in a communication network are disclosed. In some embodiments, a gateway in a communication network includes a demux manager residing in the gateway that processes one or more incoming packets, caches information relating to new process instance assignments, and allocates a process instance to a new packet flow, a process instance that caches information relating to sessions the process instance is handling in a computer readable medium in the gateway, and a network processing unit flow residing in the gateway that is setup by the process instance to route incoming packets that match specified information to a corresponding process instance.
In certain embodiments, a method of processing packets includes receiving a packet at a gateway, determining if the packet matches a limited set of criteria, and if there is a match forwarding the packet to a corresponding process instance, otherwise forwarding to a demux manager, analyzing the packet at the demux manager to determine whether to assign a new process instance to handle a new packet flow and determining how to route the packet, and receiving a new packet at a process instance that is assigned from the demux manager and creating a cache entry with information from the new packet.
Systems are methods for providing management of packet-based flows on a communication network are disclosed in some embodiments. A gateway may be used to implement the management of packet flows for IP multimedia subsystem (IMS) and multimedia domain (MMD) architectures. Directing packet flows and providing physical mapping of IMS and MMD functions can be provided by a combination of hardware and software. Residing within the gateway can be one or more network processing units, line cards, as well as packet and voice processing cards. Software modules such as a network processing unit (NPU) flow, a demux manager, a session manager, and a registrar can provide physical mapping and packet flow direction among the many functions. The software modules can also be setup to provide the physical mapping and packet flow direction in a scalable fashion, so heavy call volumes can be distributed to minimize call/session setup delays in some embodiments.
As shown in
Looking at the call processing layer 314, this layer includes signaling protocols and call control using universal SIP as an application program interface (API). The signaling protocols can be SIP or can be other protocols like ISUP, MGCP, or H.323. Further, the call processing layer 314 allows interworking between SIP variants and other protocols through a unified mapping interface. The unified mapping interface can convert protocol specific messages and parameters to a universal SIP like API format. SIP like messaging is used, in some embodiments, because SIP has the largest message set and can cover the possible messaging scenarios for SIP and the other protocols. The call processing layer 314 can also provide transparency to data that need not be processed by the CSCF core by placing that information into an envelope. Parameters that are not of interest can be placed in an envelope and remain unmodified. The CSCF core allows any text string as the calling and called number, and the number does not need to be restricted to an E.164 number. The number could be, for example, an Address of Record (AoR) or any name string with a domain name.
The gateway can implement a number of different approaches for providing scalability and session initiation protocol (SIP) packet flow management in some embodiments. A port number based routing approach provides a subscriber a port for sending and receiving requests and responses. The port directs the request and responses to the session manager assigned to the subscriber. A NPU flow can be installed on that port to recognize packet flows originating from a particular subscriber. In another approach, for example, packets/messages can go through a SIP demux manager, and the SIP demux manager can direct the packets/message to the appropriate session manager instance or function. In other embodiments, a NPU flow can be installed for each registered mobile node based the mobile node's IP address and port number. The NPU flow can be installed by the registrar function of the session manager in certain embodiments. When a mobile node sends its contact IP address and port number as part of the registration process, the registrar can cache the contact information and install the NPU flow for the destination IP address and port number.
A demux manager 352 resides in the signal routing layer 354, as shown in
The demux manager can also direct packet flows among functions internal to the gateway and physical entities to which other functions are mapped. In directing packet flows, demux manager can steer packet flows to balance loads. For example, if a packet is to be sent to more than one function and order does not matter, the demux manager sends the packet to the least loaded or a less congested function. The demux manager, in some embodiments, can determine congestion based on outstanding packets at different functions or from the delay when one or more packets return to the demux manager. Information extracted from packets can be cached locally in the signal routing layer to allow processing to occur without retrieving information from external databases.
In certain embodiments, incoming packets are sent to a first in, first out (FIFO) queue in the demux manager. The packet at the head of the queue is de-queued and inspected to see how long the packet has been waiting in the queue. If the packet has waited longer than a pre-set time, the packet is deemed to be too old and dropped. Otherwise, the packet is inspected to see if a new session is to be established or if the packet is to be routed to a session manager instance or other function. If a new session is to be established, a session manager selection routine is invoked and the packet is forwarded to the selected session manager. Packets that belong to an already established session are forwarded to the corresponding session manager previously selected. A demux manager can keep a list of the session managers and assign a weighted load factor to each session manager. The list is sorted by the weighted load factor so the least loaded session manager can be selected for a new session.
The load factor can be determined by calculating the following parameters: the number of active sessions, dormant sessions, outstanding requests, round trip time, and the load on the processing unit where the session manager is running, in some embodiments. The load factor can be calculated by obtaining a maximum value for each of the parameters and determining how each session manager is relative to the maximum. Each of the parameters is assigned a percentage with the total adding to 100. The parameters and the list sort order can be periodically updated. Depending on the availability and load levels indicated in the list, new sessions managers can also be added dynamically.
As mentioned above, the demux manager inspects the packets and completes a certain amount of processing, in certain embodiments. The processing can involve parsing the packet header to extract information in some of the fields, with some or all of this information being cached, if the information is not stored already. The information can be used to verify the packet's authenticity (e.g., the packet is not part of some attack on the system) and to validate that the packet is not malformed. The information that can be cached includes Contact (IP address/Fully qualified domain name of mobile node) and Address of record/Public user Id. The packet is then routed to the session manager handling the packet's session.
Demux manager provides direction handling of packets for a collapsed call session control function (CSCF), in certain embodiments, which can be implemented on the gateway and with external CSCF entities. Direction handling can be implemented based on a rule or rule set in a collapsed CSCF in some embodiments.
In some embodiments, demux manager sends packet(s) to the session manager instance that can handle the session or that is already handling the session. To identify the session manager instance handling the session, the demux manager determines whether to analyze based on an originating subscriber address or a destination subscriber address. Based on the network device or the entity the message is coming from, the demux manager can determine whether to look for a source or a destination address. In some embodiments, some proprietary parameter is inserted into a SIP message to aid the decision without much, if any, additional analysis.
The logic in demux manager to identify the session manager can be implemented as follows. Check the via/source address. If this address matches one of the registered address then the packet is coming from the mobile node. Otherwise, if via/source address matches one of the peering server addresses, then use that information to make a routing decision and perform the origination/destination address analysis. Otherwise, if via/source address matches one of the cached server's information received from service route/path, use that information to make the routing decision, and add a direction flag in the subscriber table. Otherwise, do the destination address analysis assuming the call (or packets) is coming from the network and if destination address is also not there in the hash table, then allocate to a new session manager.
The table below describes direction handling of incoming packets by a demux manager and/or session manager when the gateway is acting as a P-CSCF only in accordance with certain embodiments. P-CSCF receives messages from the following components: one or more mobile nodes, a home network I-CSCF, and a home network S-CSCF.
The table below describes direction handling of incoming packets by a demux manager and/or session manager when receiving messages or packets for an I-CSCF. An I-CSCF can receive messages from the following interfaces: a home P-CSCF 412, a visited network P-CSCF 418, a home S-CSCF 422, an external I-CSCF 420, an external S-CSCF 422, and an external BGCF 426.
The table below describes direction handling of incoming packets by a demux manager and session manager when receiving messages or packets for an S-CSCF. A S-CSCF receives messages from the following interfaces: P-CSCF 412, visited network P-CSCF 418, I-CSCF 414, MGCF 424, external I-CSCF 420, external S-CSCF 422, external BGCF 426.
From the above tables, it can be appreciated that the demux manager and the session manager, which includes CSCF core functionalities, work together to direct and process packets.
PAC 512 implements session manager 520 and 522. Session manager 520 includes a CSCF core 524, a subscriber local cache 526, a call state data 528, and a SIP stack 530. CSCF core 524 can include a P-CSCF, a S-CSCF, and a I-CSCF or can implement the functions of a P-CSCF, a S-CSCF, and/or a I-CSCF on packet(s) in session manager 520. Subscriber local cache 526 includes a number of pieces of information which can be used to reduce lookup times for routing packets from the session manager or reduce direction analysis processing time. For example, AOR/public user identity, private user identity (unique for a subscriber, could be IMSI), contact, registration expiry, registration status (active, expired), service route header/path header, auth vector, and subscriber profile. Call state data includes information about the state of sessions, e.g., registered, alerting, answered, release, and wait, which can be used to make decisions on whether to allocate or deallocate resources and accept or reject messages coming from the network.
SIP stack 530 includes a connection handler (CH), a transaction manager (TM), and a user application (UAPP). The connection handler manages the connections to remote servers over a single communications interface, and handles the formatting and multiplexing of outbound SIP messages as well as the parsing and de-multiplexing of inbound SIP messages. Transaction manager implements the core SIP functionality and supports proxy server, registrar, redirect server, and user agent functionalities. User application manages the correlators and handles used to identify calls, sessions, and transactions in the SIP stack.
By caching information in the SIP demux manager and the session manager, these entities can make routing decisions quicker because lookup time is saved. In some embodiments, the NPU flows can direct the packet flows to the session manager handling the session and the session manager cache can be used for obtaining information regarding the subscriber. The demux manager can direct packets that are not picked up by a NPU flow or are the registration packets from a mobile node, in certain embodiments.
The session manager can act as a registrar and redirect server. A registrar allows the SIP user to register the contact information (IP address/domain name) where the SIP user can be reached. The registrar can be a location service that allows binding between the logical address/public identity of the SIP user with the physical address. A SIP proxy or redirect server can locate the user by contacting the registrar. The registrar can be used by the S-CSCF functionality in the session manager. The P-CSCF and I-CSCF may proxy the registrations. If the session manager is implementing a S-CSCF registrar, registrar 334 (
The system of
In certain embodiments, information is cached locally to reduce setup delay that is caused from retrieving information from external databases. In some embodiments, when a subscriber registers for a first time, the location information provided in the registration message is stored in the demux manager. A process instance can be allocated for keeping the subscribers call state and contact information. Other information can also be stored. This information is used so that a call coming to or from the demux manager is directed to the process instance handling the session. The information can also be used to distribute the traffic so that a bottleneck does not occur at the demux manager.
In some embodiments, a cache including information from a registration message is used to distribute traffic coming in, e.g., from a public switched telephone network (PSTN) or a SIP interconnect. This can be implemented by storing the IP address and a handle, such as the Address of Record (AoR). The AoR can be a SIP handle such as sip:name@starentnetworks.com or sip:phonenumber@starentnetworks.com;user=phone or a tel:phonenumber which is a tel URI. This handle information is generally stored in another database and lookup can take some time. Thus, when a registration message comes in it can use information, such as the SIP handle and do a reverse lookup in the database and get information including the telephone number to place in the cache. This database information can be used when a request comes in from PSTN with a telephone number. The telephone number can be matched against the information in the cache to route the traffic flow to the process instance handling the call session.
In certain embodiments, a network processing unit (NPU) directs traffic to the process instance that handles the call session bypassing the demux manager and the signaling routing layer (see
In certain embodiments, the system of
If the message has already been assigned a session manager, the demux manager can use a hash list to make a number of routing decisions. In 618, after a message is received at the gateway in 610, the message matches identifying information in the demux manager's hash list. When a match is made against the demux manager, the demux manager sends the packets or message to the previously allocated session manager in 620. The session manager can make further determinations about how the packets or message is to be handled and direct it to the next destination in 616.
If the message has already been assigned a session manager, the message may match against a NPU flow hast list in 622, after being received at the gateway in 610. The NPU flow can redirect a number of common packets or messages using a limited set of information. The NPU flow can be mostly implemented in hardware to decrease delay in routing the packets. The NPU flow can relieve the demux manager from having to inspect each incoming packet. If a packet does not match against the NPU flow it can be sent to the demux manager for routing. In some embodiments the NPU flow passes the packet on to the session manager handling the session for further processing and/or routing in 624. The message is then directed to the next destination in 616.
The gateway described above is implemented in a chassis in some embodiments. This chassis can implement multiple and different integrated functionalities. In some embodiments, an access gateway, a packet data serving node (PDSN), a foreign agent (FA), or a home agent (HA) can be implemented on a chassis. Other types of functionalities can also be implemented on a chassis in other embodiments are a Gateway General packet radio service Support Node (GGSN), a serving GPRS support node (SGSN), a packet data inter-working function (PDIF), an access service network gateway (ASNGW), a base station, a access network, a User Plane Entity (UPE), an IP Gateway, an access gateway, a session initiation protocol (SIP) server, a proxy-call session control function (P-CSCF), and an interrogating-call session control function (I-CSCF). In certain embodiments, one or more of the above-mentioned other types of functionalities are integrated together or provided by the same functionality. For example, an access network can be integrated with a PDSN. A chassis can include a PDSN, a FA, a HA, a GGSN, a PDIF, an ASNGW, a UPE, an IP Gateway, an access gateway, or any other applicable access interface device. In certain embodiments, a chassis is provided by Starent Networks, Corp. of Tewksbury, Mass. in a ST16 or a ST40 multimedia platform.
The features of a chassis that implements an enterprise access gateway, in accordance with some embodiments, are further described below. The chassis includes slots for loading application cards and line cards. A midplane can be used in the chassis to provide intra-chassis communications, power connections, and transport paths between the various installed cards. The midplane can include buses such as a switch fabric, a control bus, a system management bus, a redundancy bus, and a time division multiplex (TDM) bus. The switch fabric is an IP-based transport path for user data throughout the chassis implemented by establishing inter-card communications between application cards and line cards. The control bus interconnects the control and management processors within the chassis. The chassis management bus provides management of system functions such as supplying power, monitoring temperatures, board status, data path errors, card resets, and other failover features. The redundancy bus provides transportation of user data and redundancy links in the event of hardware failures. The TDM bus provides support for voice services on the system.
The chassis supports at least two types of application cards: a switch processor card and a packet accelerator card. The switch processor card serves as a controller of the chassis and is responsible for such things as initializing the chassis and loading software configurations onto other cards in the chassis. The packet accelerator card provides packet processing and forwarding capabilities. Each packet accelerator card is capable of supporting multiple contexts. Hardware engines can be deployed with the card to support parallel distributed processing for compression, classification traffic scheduling, forwarding, packet filtering, and statistics compilations.
The packet accelerator card performs packet-processing operations through the use of control processors and a network processing unit (NPU). The network processing unit determines packet processing requirements; receives and transmits user data frames to/from various physical interfaces; makes IP forwarding decisions; implements packet filtering, flow insertion, deletion, and modification; performs traffic management and traffic engineering; modifies/adds/strips packet headers; and manages line card ports and internal packet transportation. The control processors, also located on the packet accelerator card, provide packet-based user service processing. The line cards when loaded in the chassis provide input/output connectivity and can also provide redundancy connections as well.
In some embodiments, a ST40 embodiment of the chassis can support a system management card (SMC) and a packet services card (PSC). The system management card is a system control and management card for managing and controlling other cards in the chassis. The packet services card is a high-speed processing card that provides multi-threaded point-to-point, packet data processing, and context processing capabilities, among other things.
The operating system software can be based on a Linux software kernel and run specific applications in the chassis such as monitoring tasks and providing protocol stacks. The software allows chassis resources to be allocated separately for control and data paths. For example, certain packet accelerator cards can be dedicated to performing routing or security control functions, while other packet accelerator cards are dedicated to processing user session traffic. As network requirements change, hardware resources can be dynamically deployed to meet the requirements in some embodiments. The system can be virtualized to support multiple logical instances of services, such as technology functions (e.g., a PDSN, ASNGW, PDIF, HA, GGSN, or IPSG).
The chassis' software can be divided into a series of tasks that perform specific functions. These tasks communicate with each other as needed to share control and data information throughout the chassis. A task is a software process that performs a specific function related to system control or session processing. Three types of tasks operate within the chassis in some embodiments: critical tasks, controller tasks, and manager tasks. The critical tasks control functions that relate to the chassis' ability to process calls such as chassis initialization, error detection, and recovery tasks. The controller tasks mask the distributed nature of the software from the user and perform tasks such as monitor the state of subordinate manager(s), provide for intra-manager communication within the same subsystem, and enable inter-subsystem communication by communicating with controller(s) belonging to other subsystems. The manager tasks can control system resources and maintain logical mappings between system resources.
Individual tasks that run on processors in the application cards can be divided into subsystems. A subsystem is a software element that either performs a specific task or is a culmination of multiple other tasks. A single subsystem can include critical tasks, controller tasks, and manager tasks. Some of the subsystems that can run on a chassis include a system initiation task subsystem, a high availability task subsystem, a recovery control task subsystem, a shared configuration task subsystem, a resource management subsystem, a virtual private network subsystem, a network processing unit subsystem, a card/slot/port subsystem, and a session subsystem.
The system initiation task subsystem is responsible for starting a set of initial tasks at system startup and providing individual tasks as needed. The high availability task subsystem works in conjunction with the recovery control task subsystem to maintain the operational state of the chassis by monitoring the various software and hardware components of the chassis. Recovery control task subsystem is responsible for executing a recovery action for failures that occur in the chassis and receives recovery actions from the high availability task subsystem. Shared configuration task subsystem provides the chassis with an ability to set, retrieve, and receive notification of chassis configuration parameter changes and is responsible for storing configuration data for the applications running within the chassis. Resource management subsystem is responsible for assigning resources (e.g., processor and memory capabilities) to tasks and for monitoring the task's use of the resources.
Virtual private network (VPN) subsystem manages the administrative and operational aspects of VPN-related entities in the chassis, which include creating separate VPN contexts, starting IP services within a VPN context, managing IP pools and subscriber IP addresses, and distributing the IP flow information within a VPN context. In some embodiments, within the chassis, IP operations are done within specific VPN contexts. The network processing unit subsystem is responsible for many of the functions listed above for the network processing unit. The card/slot/port subsystem is responsible for coordinating the events that occur relating to card activity such as discovery and configuration of ports on newly inserted cards and determining how line cards map to application cards. The session subsystem is responsible for processing and monitoring a mobile subscriber's data flows in some embodiments. Session processing tasks for mobile data communications include: A10/A11 termination for CDMA networks, GSM tunneling protocol termination for GPRS and/or UMTS networks, asynchronous PPP processing, packet filtering, packet scheduling, Difsery codepoint marking, statistics gathering, IP forwarding, and AAA services, for example. Responsibility for each of these items can be distributed across subordinate tasks (called managers) to provide for more efficient processing and greater redundancy. A separate session controller task serves as an integrated control node to regulate and monitor the managers and to communicate with the other active subsystem. The session subsystem also manages specialized user data processing such as payload transformation, filtering, statistics collection, policing, and scheduling.
In some embodiments, the software needed for implementing a process or a database includes a high level procedural or an object-orientated language such as C, C++, C#, Java, or Perl. The software may also be implemented in assembly language if desired. Packet processing implemented in a chassis can include any processing determined by the context. For example, packet processing may involve high-level data link control (HDLC) framing, header compression, and/or encryption. In certain embodiments, the software is stored on a storage medium or device such as read-only memory (ROM), programmable-read-only memory (PROM), electrically erasable programmable-read-only memory (EEPROM), flash memory, or a magnetic disk that is readable by a general or special purpose-processing unit to perform the processes described in this document.
Although the present invention has been described and illustrated in the foregoing embodiments, it is understood that the present disclosure has been made only by way of example, and that numerous changes in the details of implementation of the invention may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention, which is limited only by the claims which follow.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/952,980, entitled “Scalability of Providing Packet Flow Management,” filed Dec. 7, 2007 which claims benefit under 35 U.S.C. §119(e) of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/873,493, entitled “Apparatus and Method for Providing a Call Session Control Function,” filed Dec. 7, 2006, the contents of both of which are hereby incorporated by reference herein in their entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5850441 | Townsend et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5892924 | Lyon et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
6119234 | Aziz et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6138156 | Fletcher et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6327471 | Song | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6431875 | Elliott et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6434117 | Momona | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6477590 | Habusha et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6687252 | Bertrand et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6714987 | Amin et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6775273 | Kung et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6778494 | Mauger | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6792461 | Hericourt | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6810259 | Zhang | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6847991 | Kurapati | Jan 2005 | B1 |
6853630 | Manning | Feb 2005 | B1 |
6854014 | Amin et al. | Feb 2005 | B1 |
6888821 | Rasanen et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6973309 | Rygula et al. | Dec 2005 | B1 |
6978380 | Husain et al. | Dec 2005 | B1 |
6996087 | Ejzak | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7222359 | Freund et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7443797 | Cheung et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7454206 | Phillips et al. | Nov 2008 | B1 |
7474894 | Cardina et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7613836 | Tober et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7702785 | Bruton, III et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7817635 | Akhtar et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
8200827 | Hunyady et al. | Jun 2012 | B1 |
8724463 | Agarwal et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
20010026550 | Kobayashi | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20020029260 | Dobbins et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020031131 | Yemini et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020131404 | Mehta et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020152179 | Racov | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020154645 | Hu et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20030016630 | Vega-Garcia et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030026260 | Ogasawara et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030050076 | Watanabe | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030055962 | Freund et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030058872 | Berggreen et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030182435 | Redlich et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030188012 | Ford | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030225897 | Krawetz | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030227880 | Heller et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030229697 | Borella | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040006573 | Takashi | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040009761 | Money et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040047290 | Komandur et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040054929 | Serpa | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040068574 | Costa Requena et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040109414 | Choi et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040109459 | Madour et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040111476 | Trossen et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040122954 | Shaheen | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040122967 | Bressler et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040137918 | Varonen et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040139230 | Kim | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040152469 | Yla-Outinen et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040181686 | Krause et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040224688 | Fischer | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040228331 | Hansen et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040252694 | Adhikari et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050002381 | Westman et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050005025 | Harville et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050009520 | Herrero et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050021713 | Dugan et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050083974 | Mayer et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050111450 | Miyamoto et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050124341 | Myllymaki et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050190740 | Zhao et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050201357 | Poyhonen | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050204052 | Wang et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050220095 | Narayanan et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050233727 | Poikselka et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20060015615 | Merle et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060025132 | Karaoguz et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060031536 | Eydelman et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060031559 | Sorokopud et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060045064 | Qin et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060046714 | Kalavade | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060058056 | Das et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060067244 | Sekaran et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060104431 | Emery et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060146792 | Ramachandran et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060155871 | Ilkka et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060193295 | White et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060211423 | Ejzak et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060239255 | Ramachandran et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060251050 | Karlsson | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060256751 | Jagadeesan et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060256779 | Lim et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060264213 | Thompson | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060270404 | Tuohino et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060291412 | Naqvi et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070022199 | Tatsubori | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070025301 | Petersson et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070036078 | Chowdhury et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070036079 | Chowdury et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070041320 | Chen et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070058561 | Virgile | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070066286 | Hurtta | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070076729 | Takeda | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070082681 | Kim et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070097967 | Kauppinen et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070118656 | Anderson et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070156869 | Galchev et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070184779 | Park et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070195805 | Lindgren | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070206515 | Andreasen et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070206617 | Andreasen et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070209061 | Dekeyzer et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070253371 | Harper et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070254673 | Stenberg et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070271379 | Carlton et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080002592 | Yegani et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080013533 | Bogineni et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080020775 | Willars | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080052387 | Heinz et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080080525 | Chatilov et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080084867 | Foti et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080095339 | Elliott et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080130637 | Kant et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080137541 | Agarwal et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080219218 | Rydnell et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080233947 | Herrero-Veron | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080254768 | Faccin | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080261557 | Sim | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090054037 | Kaippallimalil | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090109845 | Andreasen et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090129388 | Akhtar et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090285225 | Dahod | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20100006744 | Kochi | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20110199978 | Phan-Anh et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1640076 | Jul 2005 | CN |
101589589 | May 2014 | CN |
1414212 | Apr 2004 | EP |
1492275 | Dec 2004 | EP |
1832069 | Jul 2006 | EP |
2095585 | Jun 2008 | EP |
2092766 | Aug 2009 | EP |
WO-0122642 | Mar 2001 | WO |
WO-2005064978 | Jul 2005 | WO |
WO-2007081727 | Jul 2007 | WO |
WO-2008070869 | Jun 2008 | WO |
WO2008070870 | Jun 2008 | WO |
WO-2009067445 | May 2009 | WO |
Entry |
---|
3GPP TS 23.401 v8.3.0 (Sep. 2008), 3rd Generation Partnership Project; Technical Specification Group Services and System Aspects; General Packet Radio Services (GPRS) enhancements for Evolved Universal Terrestrial Radio Access Network (E-UTRAN) access (Release 8), http://www.3gpp.org (204 pages). |
3GPP TS 29.274 v1.3.0 (Oct. 2008), 3rd Generation Partnership Project; Technical Specification Group Core Network and Terminals; 3GPP Evolved Packet System; Evolved GPRS Tunnelling Protocol for Control Plane (GTPv2-C0; Stage 3 (Release 8); http://www.3gpp.org (1 page). |
3GPP TS 36.413 v8.3.0 (Sep. 2008), 3rd Generation Partnership Project; Technical Specification Group Radio Access Network; Evolved Universal Terrestrial Radio Access Network (E-UTRAN0); S1 Application Protocol (S1AP) (Release 8), http://www.3gpp.org (184 pages). |
<http://www.3gpp.org/ftp/Specs/html-info/24229.htm> printed on Dec. 5, 2009 (4 pages). |
<http://www.acmepacket.com/html/page.asp?PageID=%7bFB2657BA-EE7A-46C1-BEA8-F650C93BF5C3%7d> printed on Dec. 5, 2009 (19 pages). |
Brandt, et al., “A Gateway Architecture for Mobile Multimedia Streaming”, European Symposium on Mobile Media Delivery, Sep. 20, 2006 (5 pages). |
CT Labs Report, “SIP and RTP Denial of Service Attack Tests Summary Report”, pp. 1-4, 2005. |
Gouya, et al., “SCIM (Service Capability Interaction Manager) Implementation Issues in IMS Service Architecture”, IEEE International Conference on Communications, 2006 (7 pages). |
http://www.3gpp.org, 3GPP TS 24.229 V6.12.0 (Sep. 2006), Oct. 3, 2006 (2 pages). |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for corresponding International Patent Application No. PCT/US2007/086884 issued on Apr. 10, 2008 (4 pages). |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for corresponding International Patent Application No. PCT/US2009/043696 issued on Jun. 24, 2009 (5 pages). |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT Application No. PCT/US07/86808 issued on Apr. 10, 2008 (4 pages). |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT Application No. PCT/US07/86886 mailed Apr. 10, 2008 (4 pages). |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT Application No. PCT/US2007/000132 mailed on Oct. 2, 2007 (17 pages). |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT Application No. PCT/US2008/83911 issued on Jan. 12, 2009 (5 pages). |
International Search Report and Written Opinion issued for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2007/086747 issued on May 7, 2008 (4 pages). |
International Search Report and Written Opinion issued for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2007/086802 issued on May 20, 2008 (6 pages). |
International Search Report for International Application No. PCT/US09/64823 mailed Feb. 12, 2010 (1 page). |
Montes, et al., “Deployment of IP Multimedia Streaming Services in Third-Generation Mobile Networks”, IEEE Wireless Communications, Oct. 2002 (9 pages). |
Nguyen-Vuong. “Mobility Management in 4G Wireless Heterogeneous Networks”, PhD thesis. Jul. 2, 2008. www.biblio.univ.evry.fr/theses/2008/2008EVRY00007.pdf (225 pages). |
Supplementary European Search Report issued in EP 07865428, mailed Dec. 16, 2011, (6 pages). |
Government of India Patent Office Feb. 20, 2015 First in Examination Report from IN 2174/KOLNP/2009. |
PCT Jun. 10, 2009 International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application PCT/US2007/086886. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140369354 A1 | Dec 2014 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60873493 | Dec 2006 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11952980 | Dec 2007 | US |
Child | 14263378 | US |