Technical Field
The present disclosure relates generally to methods and apparatus for processing conference calls.
Description of the Related Art
Participants of a conference call typically connect to a conference via a conference bridge. More particularly, each participant is typically connected to a different port of the conference bridge. In order to ensure that there are sufficient resources for the participants of a conference, the conference bridge typically reserves a specific number of ports for the expected number of participants. However, it is difficult to predict the number of ports that will be needed for a given conference. In addition, since a conference bridge may simultaneously support multiple conferences that may begin and end at different times, it is difficult to divide the resources of the conference bridge among the conferences. Consequently, conferences are often either under or over subscribed, resulting in either a waste of conference resources or an inability of users to join a conference due to insufficient resources.
In the following description, numerous specific details are set forth in order to provide a thorough understanding of the disclosed embodiments. It will be obvious, however, to one skilled in the art, that the disclosed embodiments may be practiced without some or all of these specific details. In other instances, well known process steps have not been described in detail in order not to unnecessarily obscure the disclosed embodiments.
In accordance with one embodiment, a conference bridge receives a call initiated by a first caller endpoint. The conference bridge identifies a conference to which the call requests entry and determines whether the conference bridge has available resources to process the call. The conference bridge enables the call to join the conference via a second conference bridge associated with a second caller endpoint participating in the conference according to whether the conference bridge has available resources to process the call.
In accordance with another embodiment, a caller endpoint having a conference bridge associated therewith receives a call, the call requesting entry to a conference and being initiated by a caller endpoint. The caller endpoint having the conference bridge determines whether it is connected to the conference. If the caller endpoint having the conference bridge is connected to the conference, the conference bridge connects the caller endpoint that initiated the call to the conference.
The disclosed embodiments enable an interested user to join a conference call (i.e., conference), even when a conference bridge that has received a call from the user is unable to connect the user to the conference due to insufficient resources. This is accomplished by enabling the conference bridge to transfer, forward, or otherwise direct the call to another conference bridge. In this manner, conference resources are managed without wasting conference resources.
Similarly, users 118, 120, 122 may attempt to join the same conference via corresponding caller endpoints 124, 126, 128, respectively, which are coupled to a second network 130 such as LAN 2. Each of the caller endpoints 118, 120, 122 may be implemented via a device such as a telephone, cellular phone, soft phone, or other device capable of processing, receiving, and/or transmitting voice or multimedia signals in accordance with a protocol such as Voice over IP or other suitable protocol. When the users 118, 120, 122 call into the conference, conference bridge 132, shown coupled to the second network, LAN 2130, may receive the call. A third network 134, which may be a wide area network (WAN), may support communication between the network 114 and the second network 130.
In order to join a conference, a user dials a number that initiates a call to a conference bridge. The user may enter his or her name, meeting identifier, and a password. The conference bridge determines whether it has available resources (e.g., ports) to process the call. If the conference bridge has available resources (e.g., an available port), the conference bridge accepts the call such that the call joins the conference.
For example, user 102 may join the conference, followed by user 104. Upon connecting user 102 and 104 to the conference, the conference bridge 116 may have no further available resources due to other participants to the conference and/or other conferences. Although user 106 also dials in to participate in the conference, the conference bridge 116 is unable to connect another participant to the conference. As a result, the conference bridge 116 transfers, forwards, or otherwise directs the call to another conference bridge. For instance, the conference bridge 116 may identify one or more available conference bridges prior to transferring, forwarding, or otherwise directing the call to one of those conference bridges.
In this example, the conference bridge 116 may direct the call to the conference bridge 132. However, although the conference bridge 132 may have available resources (e.g., ports) to accept the call, the conference bridge 132 is in a different network. As a result, it may be impossible to connect user 106 to the conference via the conference bridge 132. Moreover, connecting user 106 to the conference via the conference bridge 132 would introduce substantial delay. As a result, it may be desirable to connect user 106 to the conference via another conference bridge that is closer to the user 106.
In accordance with one embodiment, one or more caller endpoints such as one or more of the caller endpoints 108, 110, 112 and 124, 126, 128 may include a conference bridge. Thus, the conference bridge 116 may choose one of the available conference bridges of a caller endpoint to connect user 106 to the conference, such as the conference bridge of the caller endpoint 110.
A conference bridge typically includes two components. The first component is a multipoint controller (MC) and the second component is a media processor (MP). The multipoint controller typically performs processing in the control plane, while the media processor typically performs processing in the data plane (e.g., voice or multimedia processing). The MP and the MC may reside on the same network device (e.g., server) or, alternatively, the MP and the MC may reside on different network devices coupled to the network. A conference bridge may operate in accordance with a protocol such as the H.323, Session Initiation Protocol (SIP), or other suitable standard or proprietary protocol.
The conference bridge may also determine whether it has available resources to process the call at 206. For instance, the multipoint controller of the conference bridge may determine whether the conference bridge has one or more available ports via which the call may be connected to the conference. The conference bridge may then enable the call to join the conference according to whether the conference bridge has available resources to process the call, as will be described in further detail below. If the conference bridge has available resources to process the call, the conference bridge accepts the call such that the call joins the conference at 208 and the process ends at 210. However, if the conference bridge does not have available resources to process the call, the conference bridge (e.g., multipoint controller) identifies an available conference bridge via which the conference can be entered at 212, as will be described in further detail below with reference to
The conference bridge may identify those caller endpoints having an associated conference bridge from data that has previously been configured. The data that has been configured may explicitly identify one or more caller endpoints having an associated conference bridge. Alternatively, the data that has been configured may include data such as the type and/or model of the endpoint from which the existence of an associated conference bridge may be implied.
Alternatively, the conference bridge may identify those caller endpoints having an associated conference bridge from data that has been obtained during call setup that indicates whether a caller endpoint has an associated conference bridge. More particularly, a caller endpoint may notify another device (e.g., caller endpoint or conference bridge) that it has an internal conference bridge as part of a capability exchange. Such a notification may explicitly indicate that the caller endpoint has an internal conference bridge. The notification may also include information such as the type and/or model of the endpoint from which the existence of an internal conference bridge may be implied. In this manner, the notification may indicate that the caller endpoint has conferencing resources that can be made available to the conference bridge, thereby enabling the conference bridge to extend its capacity to process calls that it receives.
Even if a caller endpoint having an associated conference bridge is currently participating in the conference, that caller endpoint may not have available resources at that time. Thus, the conference bridge may ascertain one or more of the identified endpoints having an associated conference bridge that have one or more available ports such that one or more available conference bridges are identified at 224. The conference bridge may then select one of the identified available conference bridges at 226. For instance, the conference bridge may select an available conference bridge via which to connect the user to the conference in accordance with various criteria. Thus, the conference bridge may apply various algorithms to select a conference bridge in accordance with one or more criteria.
Criteria for selecting a conference bridge may include the amount of available resources (e.g., ports). A conference bridge that has received a call may directly or indirectly determine the amount of available resources of another conference bridge. For instance, the conference bridge that has received the call may approximate the amount of resources that are available according to the type and/or model of device having the available conference bridge. More particularly, each type of device typically includes a specific amount of resources (e.g., number of ports). Thus, it may be desirable to identify the type of device in which the available conference bridge is implemented. For instance, the type of device may be identified as part of call set up when a call is received.
It may also be desirable to select a conference bridge in accordance with the quality of the connection that is likely to be established via that conference bridge. The conference bridge that has received a call may determine the quality of the connection that is likely to be established via an available conference bridge based upon voice quality, link quality, quality of service, bandwidth considerations, and/or the distance between the available conference bridge and the caller endpoint that initiated the call. The conference bridge that has received the call may determine link quality by obtaining one or more parameters when the call is received, such as parameters indicating an amount of packet loss or echo. The conference bridge that has received the call may similarly obtain the Quality of Service as a parameter when the call is received. Bandwidth considerations may include the ability to perform bandwidth reservations, the available bandwidth between the various caller endpoints, the available bandwidth between the caller endpoint that initiated the call and the conference bridge that has received the call, and/or the available bandwidth between the conference bridge that has received the call and the available conference bridge being considered. The conference bridge that has received the call may determine voice quality dynamically using a real-time voice quality algorithm such as ITU P.VTQ or P.563. The conference bridge that has received the call may ascertain the distance between the available conference bridge being considered and the caller endpoint that initiated the call by determining the number of hops between the caller endpoint and the available conference bridge. More particularly, the conference bridge that has received the call may determine the number of hops between the caller endpoint and the available conference bridge by adding the number of hops between the caller endpoint and the conference bridge that received the call to the number of hops between the conference bridge that received the call and the available conference bridge being considered. In this manner, the conference bridge may select the closest caller endpoint having an associated conference bridge.
Even if the call has been successfully authenticated, it is possible that the caller endpoint having the available conference bridge is no longer connected to the conference. Thus, the network device determines whether the caller endpoint having the available conference bridge is still connected to the conference at 312. In accordance with one embodiment, if the caller endpoint is no longer connected to the conference, the conference bridge of the caller endpoint cannot accept the call. Therefore, the available conference bridge of the caller endpoint may reject the call at 308, and the process ends at 310. Alternatively, the available conference bridge of the caller endpoint may transfer or otherwise direct the call to another available conference bridge in a manner similar to that set forth above with reference to
If the caller endpoint having the available conference bridge is still connected to the conference (and it has available resources to process the call), the available conference bridge connects the caller endpoint that initiated the call to the conference at 314. Thus, the audio or multimedia signals associated with each of the caller endpoints participating in the conference may be “mixed.”
As described above, upon receiving a call, a conference bridge may either process that call or transfer the call to an available conference bridge. The available conference bridge may be a conference bridge internal to a caller endpoint. An example of a conference bridge will be described with reference to
The authentication manager 406 may generate and/or obtain a key, as well as encrypt the key. The authentication manager 406 may then provide the key to the caller endpoint that has initiated the call and/or the available conference bridge/caller endpoint to which the call is being directed. The conference bridge or caller endpoint to which the call has been directed may request that the authentication manager 406 authenticate the call using the key.
In addition, the caller endpoint 500 may also include or otherwise have associated therewith a conference bridge 504 such as a standard conference bridge (or the functionality of a standard conference bridge) such as a multimedia conference bridge. In some embodiments, the conference bridge 504 includes or has associated therewith a distributed conference bridge controller 404 (not shown) capable of transferring the call to another caller endpoint should the caller endpoint 500 be unable to process the call. The caller endpoint 500 may also include an authentication manager 506.
The authentication manager 506 may authenticate a call that has been transferred to the caller endpoint 500. For instance, the authentication manager 506 may authenticate the call using a key, which may have been encrypted. Thus, the authentication manager 506 may decrypt the key. The authentication manager 506 may authenticate the call internally to the caller endpoint 500 or the authentication manager 506 may authenticate the call by contacting another network device. For instance, the authentication manager 506 may communicate with the conference bridge 400 to request that the call be authenticated.
The above-described embodiments enable a user to gain access to a conference without needing to reserve resources. This is accomplished via an intelligent conference bridge capable of identifying an alternate conference bridge via which the user can connect to the conference. Where the alternate conference bridge is a conference bridge of a caller endpoint, resources associated with conference participants are leveraged. In this manner, conferencing ability may be scaled with the number of caller endpoints participating in a conference.
Various network devices may be configured or adapted for performing the disclosed functionality. These network devices include, but are not limited to, conference bridges, caller endpoints (e.g., telephones) including conference bridges, and soft phones with multimedia conferencing capabilities. Moreover, the functionality for the disclosed processes may be implemented in software, hardware, or any combination of hardware and software.
Yet another embodiment of the invention pertains to computer program products including machine-readable media on which are provided program instructions for implementing the methods and techniques described herein, in whole or in part. Any of the methods described herein may be represented, in whole or in part, as program instructions that can be provided on such machine-readable media. In addition, the disclosed embodiments pertain to various combinations and arrangements of data generated and/or used as described herein. For example, structures having the format described herein and provided on appropriate media are part of this disclosure.
Although illustrative embodiments and applications of the disclosed embodiments are shown and described herein, many variations and modifications are possible which remain within the concept, scope, and spirit of the embodiments of the invention, and these variations would become clear to those of ordinary skill in the art after perusal of this application. For instance, a conference call may also include video signals, as well as audio signals. Thus, although various operations are described as being performed by hardware or software, these operations are merely illustrative and therefore these operations may be performed in an alternate manner. Moreover, the disclosed embodiments need not be performed using the steps described above. Accordingly, the disclosed techniques may be performed in an alternate manner, as well as be implemented using other mechanisms and data structures.
In addition, although examples of conference bridges such as multimedia conference bridges and caller endpoints are described, the above-described embodiments may be implemented in a variety of network devices. For instance, a caller endpoint may be any network device capable of processing, transmitting and/or receiving voice or multimedia signals. Accordingly, the present embodiments are to be considered as illustrative and not restrictive, and the disclosed embodiments are not to be limited to the details given herein, but may be modified within the scope and equivalents of the appended claims.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/649,528, titled “SCALABLE CONFERENCE BRIDGE,” filed on Jan. 3, 2007, the content of which is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4460807 | Kerr | Jul 1984 | A |
4890257 | Anthias et al. | Dec 1989 | A |
5694563 | Belfiore et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5699082 | Marks et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5745711 | Kitahara et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5767897 | Howell | Jun 1998 | A |
5825858 | Shaffer et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5874962 | de Judicibus et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5995096 | Kitahara et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6040817 | Sumikawa | Mar 2000 | A |
6075531 | DeStefano | Jun 2000 | A |
6191807 | Hamada et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6300951 | Filetto et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6392674 | Hiraki et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6554433 | Holler | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6573913 | Butler et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6646997 | Baxley et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6754321 | Innes et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
RE38609 | Chen et al. | Oct 2004 | E |
7062532 | Sweat et al. | Jun 2006 | B1 |
7124164 | Chemtob | Oct 2006 | B1 |
7418664 | Ben-Shachar et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7441198 | Dempski et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7478339 | Pettiross et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7530022 | Ben-Shachar et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7620902 | Manion et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7634533 | Rudolph et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7881450 | Gentle et al. | Feb 2011 | B1 |
7920160 | Tamaru et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7956869 | Gilra | Jun 2011 | B1 |
8290998 | Stienhans et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8340268 | Knaz | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8358327 | Duddy | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8428234 | Knaz | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8434019 | Nelson | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8456507 | Mallappa et al. | Jun 2013 | B1 |
8462103 | Moscovitch et al. | Jun 2013 | B1 |
8478848 | Minert | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8630208 | Kjeldaas | Jan 2014 | B1 |
8638354 | Leow et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8675847 | Shaffer et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8694587 | Chaturvedi et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8694593 | Wren et al. | Apr 2014 | B1 |
8831505 | Seshadri | Sep 2014 | B1 |
8890924 | Wu | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8892646 | Chaturvedi et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8924862 | Luo | Dec 2014 | B1 |
8930840 | Riskó et al. | Jan 2015 | B1 |
9031839 | Thorsen et al. | May 2015 | B2 |
9032028 | Davidson et al. | May 2015 | B2 |
9143729 | Anand et al. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9197701 | Petrov et al. | Nov 2015 | B1 |
9197848 | Felkai et al. | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9201527 | Kripalani et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9204099 | Brown | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9268398 | Tipirneni | Feb 2016 | B2 |
9298342 | Zhang et al. | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9323417 | Sun et al. | Apr 2016 | B2 |
9335892 | Ubillos | May 2016 | B2 |
9349119 | Desai et al. | May 2016 | B2 |
9367224 | Ananthakrishnan et al. | Jun 2016 | B2 |
9432512 | You | Aug 2016 | B2 |
9449303 | Underhill et al. | Sep 2016 | B2 |
9495664 | Cole et al. | Nov 2016 | B2 |
9516022 | Borzycki et al. | Dec 2016 | B2 |
9525711 | Ackerman et al. | Dec 2016 | B2 |
9563480 | Messerli et al. | Feb 2017 | B2 |
9609030 | Sun et al. | Mar 2017 | B2 |
9667799 | Olivier et al. | May 2017 | B2 |
20020076003 | Zellner | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020078153 | Chung et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20030028647 | Grosu | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030046421 | Horvitz et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030174826 | Hesse | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030197739 | Bauer | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030227423 | Arai et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040098456 | Krzyzanowski et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040210637 | Loveland | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040267938 | Shoroff et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050014490 | Desai et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050055405 | Kaminsky et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050055412 | Kaminsky et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050085243 | Boyer et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050099492 | Orr | May 2005 | A1 |
20050108328 | Berkeland et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20060004911 | Becker et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060026255 | Malamud et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060164552 | Cutler | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060250987 | White et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070005752 | Chawla et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070041366 | Vugenfirer et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070091831 | Croy et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070100986 | Bagley et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070116225 | Zhao | May 2007 | A1 |
20070139626 | Saleh et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070250567 | Graham et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20080068447 | Mattila et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080080532 | O'Sullivan et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20090012963 | Johnson et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090100142 | Stern et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090193327 | Roychoudhuri et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090254619 | Kho et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090256901 | Mauchly et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090292999 | LaBine et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090309846 | Trachtenberg et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100005142 | Xiao et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100061538 | Coleman et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100070640 | Allen, Jr. et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100073454 | Lovhaugen et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100094867 | Badros et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100157978 | Robbins et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100211872 | Rolston et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100245535 | Mauchly | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100262925 | Liu et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100303227 | Gupta | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100316207 | Brunson | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110075830 | Dreher et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110131498 | Chao et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110264928 | Hinckley | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110270609 | Jones et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110271211 | Jones et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110283226 | Basson et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20120013704 | Sawayanagi et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120084714 | Sirpal et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120190386 | Anderson | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120246229 | Carr et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120246596 | Ording et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120284635 | Sitrick et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120296957 | Stinson et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120306993 | Sellers-Blais | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130038675 | Malik | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130047093 | Reuschel et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130050398 | Krans et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130063542 | Bhat et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130090065 | Fisunenko et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130091205 | Kotler et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130091440 | Kotler et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130135837 | Kemppinen | May 2013 | A1 |
20130141371 | Hallford et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130185672 | McCormick et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130198629 | Tandon et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130215215 | Gage et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130219278 | Rosenberg | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130222246 | Booms et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130227433 | Doray et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130290421 | Benson et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130300637 | Smits et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130329865 | Ristock et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130335507 | Aarrestad et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140012990 | Ko | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140028781 | MacDonald | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140040819 | Duffy | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140068452 | Joseph et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140078182 | Utsunomiya | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140157338 | Pearce | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140161243 | Contreras et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140237371 | Klemm et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140280595 | Mani et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140282213 | Musa et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140317561 | Robinson et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140372908 | Kashi et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150004571 | Ironside et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150009278 | Modai et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150029301 | Nakatomi et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150067552 | Leorin et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150081885 | Thomas et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150085060 | Fish et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150089393 | Zhang et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150089394 | Chen et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150113050 | Stahl | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150172120 | Dwarampudi et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150304366 | Bader-Natal et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150319113 | Gunderson et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20150373063 | Vashishtha et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160050079 | Martin De Nicolas et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160050175 | Chaudhry et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160072862 | Bader-Natal et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160094593 | Priya | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160110056 | Hong et al. | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160173537 | Kumar et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160182580 | Nayak | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160277461 | Sun et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160309037 | Rosenberg et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20170006446 | Harris et al. | Jan 2017 | A1 |
20170070706 | Ursin et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170104961 | Pan et al. | Apr 2017 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
101055561 | Oct 2007 | CN |
102572370 | Jul 2012 | CN |
102655583 | Sep 2012 | CN |
102938834 | Feb 2013 | CN |
103141086 | Jun 2013 | CN |
204331453 | May 2015 | CN |
0959585 | Nov 1999 | EP |
WO 2012167262 | Dec 2012 | WO |
WO 2014118736 | Aug 2014 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated May 5, 2008 from corresponding PCT Application No. PCT/US07/87530. |
“Implementing Media Gateway Control Protocols,” A RADVision White Paper, Jan. 27, 2012, 16 pp. |
Toga, J. and ElGebaly, H., “Demystifying Multimedia Conferencing Over the Internet Using the H.323 Set of Standards,” Intel Technology Journal Q2 1998, 11 pp. |
“A Primer on the H.323 Series Standard,” Version 2.0, http://www.packetizer.com/voip/h323/papers/primer/ Downloaded from the Internet Dec. 20, 2006, 17 pp. |
Author Unknown, “Active screen follows mouse and dual monitors,” KDE Community Forums, Apr. 13, 2010, 3 pages. |
Averusa, “Interactive Video Conferencing K-12 applications,” “Interactive Video Conferencing K-12 applications” copyright 2012. http://www.averusa.com/education/downloads/hvc brochure goved.pdf (last accessed Oct. 11, 2013). |
Cisco Systems, Inc., “Cisco WebEx Meetings Server System Requirements release 1.5.” 30 pages, Aug. 14, 2013. |
Cisco White Paper, “Web Conferencing: Unleash the Power of Secure, Real-Time Collaboration,” pp. 1-8, 2014. |
Clarke, Brant, “Polycom Announces RealPresence Group Series,” “Polycom Announces RealPresence Group Series” dated Oct. 8, 2012 available at http://www.323.tv/news/polycom-realpresence-group-series (last accessed Oct. 11, 2013). |
Clauser, Grant, et al., “Is the Google Home the voice-controlled speaker for you?,” The Wire Cutter, Nov. 22, 2016, pp. 1-15. |
Cole, Camille, et al., “Videoconferencing for K-12 Classrooms,” Second Edition (excerpt), http://www.iste.org/docs/excerpts/VIDCO2-excerpt.pdf (last accessed 1011-2013), 2009. |
Epson, “BrightLink Pro Projector,” BrightLink Pro Projector. http://www.epson.com/cgi-bin/Store/jsp/Landing/brightlink-pro-interactive-projectors.do?ref=van brightlink-pro—dated 2013 (last accessed Oct. 11, 2013). |
InFocus, “Mondopad,” Mondopad. http://www.infocus.com/sites/default/files/InFocus-Mondopad-INF5520a-INF7- 021-Datasheet-EN.pdf (last accessed Oct. 11, 2013), 2013. |
MacCormick, John, “Video Chat with Multiple Cameras,” CSCW '13, Proceedings of the 2013 conference on Computer supported cooperative work companion, pp. 195-198, ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2013. |
Microsoft, “Positioning Objects on Multiple Display Monitors,” Aug. 12, 2012, 2 pages. |
Mullins, Robert , “Polycom Adds Tablet Videoconferencing,” Mullins, R. “Polycom Adds Tablet Videoconferencing” available at http://www.informationweek.com/telecom/unified-communications/polycom-adds-tablet-videoconferencing/231900680 dated Oct. 12, 2011 (last accessed Oct. 11, 2013). |
Nu-Star Technologies, “Interactive Whiteboard Conferencing,” Interactive Whiteboard Conferencing. http://www.nu-star.com/interactive-conf.php dated 2013 (last accessed Oct. 11, 2013). |
Polycom, “Polycom RealPresence Mobile: Mobile Telepresence & Video Conferencing,” http://www.polycom.com/products-services/hd-telepresence-video-conferencing/realpresence-mobile.html#stab1 (last accessed Oct. 11, 2013), 2013. |
Polycom, “Polycom Turns Video Display Screens into Virtual Whiteboards with First Integrated Whiteboard Solution for Video Collaboration,” Polycom Turns Video Display Screens into Virtual Whiteboards with First Integrated Whiteboard Solution for Video Collaboration—http://www.polycom.com/company/news/press-releases/2011/20111027 2.html—dated Oct. 27, 2011 |
Polycom, “Polycom UC Board, Transforming ordinary surfaces into virtual whiteboards” 2012, Polycom, Inc., San Jose, CA, http://www.uatg.com/pdf/polycom/polycom-uc-board- datasheet.pdf, (last accessed Oct. 11, 2013). |
Stodle. Daniel, et al., “Gesture-Based, Touch-Free Multi-User Gaming on Wall-Sized, High-Resolution Tiled Displays,” 2008, 13 pages. |
Thompson, Phil, et al., “Agent Based Ontology Driven Virtual Meeting Assistant,” Future Generation Information Technology, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2010, 4 pages. |
TNO, “Multi-Touch Interaction Overview,” Dec. 1, 2009, 12 pages. |
Ubuntu, “Force Unity to open new window on the screen where the cursor is?” Sep. 16, 2013, 1 page. |
VB Forums, “Pointapi,” Aug. 8, 2001, 3 pages. |
Vidyo, “VidyoPanorama,” VidyoPanorama—http://www.vidyo.com/products/vidyopanorama/ dated 2013 (last accessed Oct. 11, 2013). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140198175 A1 | Jul 2014 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11649528 | Jan 2007 | US |
Child | 14216641 | US |