Contained herein is material that is subject to copyright protection. The copyright owner has no objection to the facsimile reproduction of the patent disclosure by any person as it appears in the Patent and Trademark Office patent files or records, but otherwise reserves all rights to the copyright whatsoever. Copyright© 2004-2015, Fortinet, Inc.
1. Field
Various embodiments of the present invention are generally related to the field of telecommunications and more particularly, but not by way of limitation, to network switches and systems and methods for multicast internet protocol (IP) forwarding.
2. Description of the Related Art
The use of computer or communications networks, including Local Area Networks (LANs), Wide-Area Networks (WANs), and the Internet continues to grow at ever increasing rates. Each day, more and more computer systems or communications devices are becoming interconnected in such wired or wireless networks, which typically communicate data in packets. This has created a need for high performance network switches, such as for use by network service providers. Many such switches comprise multiple modules, with many data flows between the modules themselves and between the interfaces to external networks. A data flow is sometimes called an “IP flow,” which refers to a stream of packets that enter and exit the same set of interfaces. The packets of a particular IP flow have the same values in the IP packet header for the following six attributes of the IP packet header: (1) Source IP Address, (2) Source L4 Port, (3) Type of Service (TOS), (4) Destination IP Address, (5) Destination L4 Port, and (6) Protocol.
In some cases, the network switch modules, including the processors residing in the modules, can be partitioned into virtual routers (VRs), that is, software running on the processors that emulates the functioning of an individual physical hardware router. As a result of the combination of hundreds of thousands of data flows for the virtual routers in these network switches, there is a need for efficiently processing packet data flows, and for controlling the resources consumed within the network switch.
As broadband network access becomes more available, individual subscribers of network service providers have more available options for different services and service levels. Even the same subscriber may have different service needs at different times. As an illustrative example, a first subscriber may desire high definition television (HDTV) service over a network. A second subscriber may desire mobile telephone service over the network. The first subscriber may occasionally desire video-on-demand (VOD). The second subscriber may need to switch between voice communication and high-speed digital data communication.
A “unicast” communication typically refers to a communication from a single source device to a single destination device over a network. By contrast, a “multicast” communication typically refers to a communication to a group of destination devices from one or more source devices. Multicast packet forwarding raises additional complexity because of the many destination devices. Many existing router devices will be unable to provide the desired scalability to accommodate such additional destination devices. This is particularly true when each individual data flow may require “per-flow” services for the multicast traffic. Allocating resources efficiently for a large number of multicast data flows is a challenging problem. Moreover, multicast broadcasting of content presents additional complexity because individual users may join or leave a particular multicast group at will and often. Such “channel surfing” creates an additional burden for keeping track of the participants of a multicast group so that the content can be routed appropriately.
Methods, apparatus and data structures for managing multicast Internet Protocol (IP) flows are described. According to one embodiment, According to one embodiment, a router identifies active multicast IP sessions. A data structure is maintained by the router that contains information regarding the active multicast IP sessions and includes multiple pairs of a source field and a group field ({S, G} pairs), a first pointer associated with each of the {S,G} pairs and a set of slots. Each of the {S, G} pairs defines an active multicast IP session. The source field defines a source of a multicast transmission of the multicast IP session and the group field defines a group corresponding to the multicast IP session. The first pointer points to a dynamically allocated set of outbound interface (OIF) blocks. Each slot has stored therein a second pointer to a transmit control block (TCB) data structure that services users participating in the multicast IP session.
Other features of embodiments of the present invention will be apparent from the accompanying drawings and from the detailed description that follows.
Embodiments of the present invention are illustrated by way of example, and not by way of limitation, in the figures of the accompanying drawings and in which like reference numerals refer to similar elements and in which:
Methods, apparatus and data structures for multicast internet protocol (IP) forwarding are described herein. In the following description, numerous specific details are set forth. However, it is understood that embodiments of the invention may be practiced without these specific details. In other instances, well-known circuits, structures and techniques have not been shown in detail in order not to obscure the understanding of this description. Note that in this description, references to “one embodiment” or “an embodiment” mean that the feature being referred to is included in at least one embodiment of the invention. Further, separate references to “one embodiment” in this description do not necessarily refer to the same embodiment; however, neither are such embodiments mutually exclusive, unless so stated and except as will be readily apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art. Thus, the present invention can include any variety of combinations and/or integrations of the embodiments described herein. Moreover, in this description, the phrase “exemplary embodiment” means that the embodiment being referred to serves as an example or illustration.
Herein, block diagrams illustrate exemplary embodiments of the invention. Also herein, flow diagrams illustrate operations of the exemplary embodiments of the invention. The operations of the flow diagrams will be described with reference to the exemplary embodiments shown in the block diagrams. However, it should be understood that the operations of the flow diagrams could be performed by embodiments of the invention other than those discussed with reference to the block diagrams, and embodiments discussed with references to the block diagrams could perform operations different than those discussed with reference to the flow diagrams. Moreover, it should be understood that although the flow diagrams may depict serial operations, certain embodiments could perform certain of those operations in parallel.
The following detailed description includes references to the accompanying drawings, which form a part of the detailed description. The drawings show, by way of illustration, specific embodiments in which the invention may be practiced. These embodiments, which are also referred to herein as “examples,” are described in enough detail to enable those skilled in the art to practice the invention. The embodiments may be combined, other embodiments may be utilized, or structural, logical and electrical changes may be made without departing from the scope of the present invention. The following detailed description is, therefore, not to be taken in a limiting sense, and the scope of the present invention is defined by the appended claims and their equivalents.
In this document, the terms “a” or “an” are used, as is common in patent documents, to include one or more than one. In this document, the term “or” is used to refer to a nonexclusive or, unless otherwise indicated. Furthermore, all publications, patents, and patent documents referred to in this document are incorporated by reference herein in their entirety, as though individually incorporated by reference. In the event of inconsistent usages between this document and those documents so incorporated by reference, the usage in the incorporated reference(s) should be considered supplementary to that of this document; for irreconcilable inconsistencies, the usage in this document controls.
Some portions of the following detailed description are presented in terms of algorithms and symbolic representations of operations on data bits within a computer memory. These algorithmic descriptions and representations are the ways used by those skilled in the data processing arts to most effectively convey the substance of their work to others skilled in the art. An algorithm includes a self-consistent sequence of steps leading to a desired result. The steps are those requiring physical manipulations of physical quantities. Usually, though not necessarily, these quantities take the form of electrical or magnetic signals capable of being stored, transferred, combined, compared, and otherwise manipulated. It has proven convenient at times, principally for reasons of common usage, to refer to these signals as bits, values, elements, symbols, characters, terms, numbers, or the like. It should be borne in mind, however, that all of these and similar terms are to be associated with the appropriate physical quantities and are merely convenient labels applied to these quantities. Unless specifically stated otherwise as apparent from the following discussions, terms such as “processing” or “computing” or “calculating” or “determining” or “displaying” or the like, refer to the action and processes of a computer system, or similar computing device, that manipulates and transforms data represented as physical (e.g., electronic) quantities within the computer system's registers and memories into other data similarly represented as physical quantities within the computer system memories or registers or other such information storage, transmission or display devices.
Although, in this example, the router 114 includes three VRs 128, other examples call for any number of VRs 128. In one example, one or more of the VRs 128 can establish subscriber connections, such as to users of the PCs 102. When establishing such connections, the VRs 128 can use the DHCP server 120 for assigning IP network addresses to the PCs 102. The VRs 128 can use the RADIUS server 124 to authenticate subscribers. After authenticating subscribers, the VRs 128 can configure subscriber connections according to service profiles, which refer to subscriber-specific services that individual subscribers receive during connections. In one example, the VRs 128 can receive service profiles information from the control server 126 or the RADIUS server 224.
After the VRs 128 establish subscriber connections, they typically provide access to the web portal 122, where users can select new services. Additionally, after establishing subscriber connections, the VRs 128 typically process and forward packets over the IP network 118 and the Internet 112. Although
At 406, in one example, the flow classification module 322 is used to classify the data flow, for example, as a unicast flow or a multicast flow. The flow classification module 322 typically uses a predefined portion of the packet header to classify the data flow, and to identify the particular FCB associated with the flow. For example, the “destination address” portion of the packet header is used to identify the packet as a multicast packet. In one example, in a first mode (sometimes referred to as a “strict-optimized mode”), the data flow classification uses the source IP address and the destination IP address portions of the packet header to classify the data flow. In a second mode (sometimes referred to as an “adaptive-optimized mode”), in which subscriber-specific services are needed, additional portions of the packet header are used to further classify the data flow in accordance with the appropriate services.
In one example, the flow classification at 406 uses the information extracted from the packet header to look up a corresponding FCB entry in FCB 326. If the data flow is a multicast data flow then, in one example, the corresponding FCB entry will have a “multicast” flag set, and a “forwarding action” field of the FCB entry will indicate that hardware forwarding of packets is to be used for the multicast data flow. At 408, if the classification indicates a multicast data flow, then, at 410, multicast packet forwarding is invoked. Otherwise, at 412, unicast packet forwarding is invoked.
Each FCB entry in FCB 326 includes information identifying a particular multicast session. Each multicast session is defined by a {Source, Group} pair, which is sometimes referred to as an {S, G} pair. The Source field of the {S, G} pair defines the source of the multicast transmission. In one example, this is a single multicast transmission source. In another example, there are multiple (e.g., redundant) transmission sources for the same multicast transmission. The Group field of the {S, G} pair defines a group corresponding to the multicast session. In one example, the group can be conceptualized as a “channel” of content. There may be one recipient or a very large number of recipients of the content. Such recipients of the multicast content can join or leave the Group at will, such as by issuing the appropriate Internet Group Management Protocol (IGMP) request or using one or more other protocols. Thus, scalability and the ability to easily update the Group are desirable qualities of the present multicast forwarding systems and methods.
Since each multicast session can have multiple IP flows associated with that particular multicast session, there can be multiple FCBs associated with the same {S, G}, where each FCB corresponds to one of these IP flows, and the {S, G} defines the particular multicast session. This may be true, for example, in the adaptive-optimized mode case, where because of the different services levels needed, there are different IP flows associated with the same multicast session.
Each OIF block includes a reasonably small number of slots 503 for storing corresponding second pointers 504 to a TCB 506 for a particular OIF. The example of
Each second pointer 504 points to a particular TCB 506, which typically includes information relevant to processing or routing packets to the particular OIF that is associated with that second pointer 504, or to services associated with the particular OIF that is associated with that second pointer 504. For example, if the packet header matches particular services in the ACL, attributes in the TCB are adjusted accordingly to obtain such services. Each second pointer 504 corresponds to a particular outbound interface (OIF) through which multicast packets are being forwarded, such as from the packet output interface 314 of the VR out over the network.
Because more than one multicast session can use the same OIF of the VR, second pointers 504 from different multicast sessions can point to the same (shared) TCB 506 for that OIF. In the illustrative example of
Similarly, because multiple IP flows can use the same OIF, there can be multiple TCBs 506 for the same OIF, such as for multiple IP flows on the same OIF, where such multiple flows use different services and, therefore, have different corresponding TCBs 506.
In
The schema depicted in
The schema depicted in
While such updating of a particular OIF block 502 is occurring, other OIF blocks 502 in the same or a different chain of OIF blocks 502 are still usable to carry out multicast forwarding to the users represented by the second pointers 504 in those other OIF blocks 502. This improves the ability to multicast content, without interruption, to a large number of recipient users on different OIFs of a particular multicast session, even as other second pointers 504 are added or removed, such as to accommodate other recipient users of that multicast session that are joining or leaving that multicast session. In one example, both OIF blocks 502 and TCBs 506 are capable of being dynamically allocated as needed. Together with the sharing of TCBs 506 or even of OIF chains, as discussed above, the schema illustrated in
At 606 the next second pointer 504 in the current OIF block 502 is retrieved. At 606, the retrieved second pointer 504 to a TCB 506 is used to build a portion of a control block that will be sent to the DMA engine 310. At 606, if other second pointers 504 exist in the current OIF block 502, then process flow returns to 606. Otherwise, process flow proceeds to 606 and the control block that was constructed for the completed OIF block 502 is sent to the DMA engine 310. In this manner, one control block corresponding to each OIF block 502 is sent to the DMA engine 310 after that control block is constructed from the corresponding OIF block 502. At 610, if other OIF blocks 502 exist in that chain, then the next OIF block 502 is retrieved and made the current OIF block, a new control block is initiated, and process flow returns to 606. Otherwise, at 610, if no other OIF blocks 501 exist in the chain, then process flow proceeds to 614 to process (or wait for) the next received packet (e.g., at 400 of
At 900, the system determines whether a received packet represents a new IP flow. This can be determined by looking at the above-described attributes in the packet header that identify a particular IP flow. If the packet corresponds to a previously identified multicast IP flow, then process flow proceeds to 606, and a previously defined FCB entry and a previously defined TCB 506 are used for further multicast forwarding processing. If a new flow is detected at 900, there will be no matching FCB entry in FCB 326. Therefore, for a new flow detected at 900, a new FCB entry will be created in FCB 326, as discussed below.
If a new flow is detected at 900, then, at 902, is its determined whether the new flow is a strict optimized mode or, instead, is in an adaptive optimized mode that provides one or more services for that particular flow. This determination is typically made using a configurable attribute.
At 902, if in the strict optimized mode, then, at 904, an OIF list (e.g., a chain of OIF blocks, as illustrated in
At 902, if in the adaptive optimized mode instead of the strict optimized mode, then, at 910 it is determined whether any ingress services are needed. In one example, this includes checking for such ingress services on the VI 208 at which the packet is received. At 910, if one or more such ingress services are needed, then, at 912, a TCB 506 is created to control the providing of any such ingress services, (otherwise process flow proceeds to 916). Then, at 914, a second pointer 504 is created to point to this newly created TCB 506. This newly created TCB 506 for the ingress services includes an OIF field 508 that specifies a null OIF (the PFE 300 does not actually forward any packets out any such null OIF).
At 916, it is determined whether there is a next OIF entry (that is, a second pointer 504) in the OIF list for the new multicast flow. If there is no such next OIF entry (e.g., upon specification of an invalid {S, G} entry or a null OIF), then process flow proceeds to 906. Otherwise, at 918, it is determined whether any outbound services are needed on the next OIF entry in the OIF module 330. If so, then, at 920, a new TCB 506 is created for that OIF entry to control the providing of any such outbound services, otherwise, at 922, the VI default TCB 332 is used for that OIF entry. Then, at 924, a second pointer 504 is created to point to the new TCB 506 or the default TCB 332, as appropriate, and the OIF list for that multicast session is updated accordingly. Then, at 926, it is determined if there is a next OIF entry in the OIF list for the multicast session. If so, process flow returns to 918, otherwise process flow proceeds to 906.
Using the above process described with respect to
Although the above examples have been discussed with respect to a router box providing virtual routers (e.g., VRs 128), the present systems and methods are not so limited. For example, certain aspects of the present systems and methods are also applicable to alternative systems using hardware routers instead of the virtual routers.
It is to be understood that the above description is intended to be illustrative, and not restrictive. For example, the above-described embodiments (and/or aspects thereof) may be used in combination with each other. Many other embodiments will be apparent to those of skill in the art upon reviewing the above description. The scope of the invention should, therefore, be determined with reference to the appended claims, along with the full scope of equivalents to which such claims are entitled. In the appended claims, the terms “including” and “in which” are used as the plain-English equivalents of the respective terms “comprising” and “wherein.” Also, in the following claims, the terms “including” and “comprising” are open-ended, that is, a system, device, article, or process that includes elements in addition to those listed after such a term in a claim are still deemed to fall within the scope of that claim. Moreover, in the following claims, the terms “first,” “second,” and “third,” etc. are used merely as labels, and are not intended to impose numerical requirements on their objects.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/714,270, filed Jul. 29, 2015, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,166,805, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/616,521, filed Feb. 6, 2015, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,167,016, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/756,071, filed Jan. 31, 2013, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,953,513, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/015,880, filed Jan. 31, 2011, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,369,258, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/328,858, filed Feb. 12, 2009, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,213,347, which is a divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/949,943, filed Sep. 24, 2004, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,499,419, all of which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety for all purposes.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4667287 | Allen et al. | May 1987 | A |
5473599 | Li et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5490252 | Macera et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5581705 | Passint et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5633866 | Callon | May 1997 | A |
5745778 | Alfieri | Apr 1998 | A |
5825772 | Dobbins et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5841973 | Kessler et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5875290 | Bartfai et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5963555 | Takase et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5987521 | Arrowood et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6014382 | Takihiro et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6014669 | Slaughter et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6032193 | Sullivan | Feb 2000 | A |
6047330 | Stracke, Jr. | Apr 2000 | A |
6069895 | Ayandeh | May 2000 | A |
6085238 | Yuasa et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6098110 | Witkowski et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6108699 | Moiin | Aug 2000 | A |
6118791 | Fichou et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6137777 | Vaid et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6169739 | Isoyama | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6169793 | Godwin et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6175867 | Taghadoss | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6192051 | Lipman | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6220768 | Barroux | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6226788 | Schoening et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6243580 | Garner | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6246682 | Roy et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6249519 | Rangachar | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6260072 | Rodriguez | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6260073 | Walker et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6266695 | Huang et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6278708 | Von Hammerstein et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6286038 | Reichmeyer et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6295297 | Lee | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6298130 | Galvin | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6330602 | Law et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6338092 | Chao et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6343083 | Mendelson et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6405262 | Vogel et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6414595 | Scrandis et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6434619 | Lim et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6438612 | Ylonen et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6449650 | Westfall et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6459682 | Ellesson et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6463061 | Rekhter et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6466976 | Alles et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6493349 | Casey | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6496935 | Fink et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6526056 | Rekhter et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6532088 | Dantu | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6542466 | Pashtan | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6542502 | Herring et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6556544 | Lee | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6597699 | Ayres | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6608816 | Nichols | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6636516 | Yamano | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6639897 | Shiomoto et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6658013 | de Boer et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6674756 | Rao et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6697359 | George | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6697360 | Gai et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6738371 | Ayres | May 2004 | B1 |
6769124 | Schoening et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6775267 | Kung | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6822958 | Branth et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6856676 | Pirot et al. | Feb 2005 | B1 |
6862279 | Imai et al. | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6868082 | Allen et al. | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6883170 | Garcia | Apr 2005 | B1 |
6920146 | Johnson et al. | Jul 2005 | B1 |
6922774 | Meushaw et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6938097 | Vincent | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6944128 | Nichols | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6944168 | Paatela et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6954429 | Horton et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6982987 | Cain | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6985438 | Tschudin | Jan 2006 | B1 |
7002965 | Cheriton | Feb 2006 | B1 |
7020143 | Zdan | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7028333 | Tuomenoska et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7042843 | Ni | May 2006 | B2 |
7042848 | Santiago et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7062642 | Langrind et al. | Jun 2006 | B1 |
7082477 | Sadhasivam et al. | Jul 2006 | B1 |
7096383 | Talaugon et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7096495 | Warrier et al. | Aug 2006 | B1 |
7111072 | Matthews et al. | Sep 2006 | B1 |
7116665 | Balay et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7116679 | Ghahremani | Oct 2006 | B1 |
7155518 | Forslow | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7159031 | Larkin et al. | Jan 2007 | B1 |
7161904 | Hussain et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7174372 | Sarkar | Feb 2007 | B1 |
7177311 | Hussain et al. | Feb 2007 | B1 |
7181547 | Millet | Feb 2007 | B1 |
7181766 | Bendinelli et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7203192 | Desai et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7225259 | Ho et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7263106 | Matthews et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7266120 | Cheng et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7272643 | Sarkar et al. | Sep 2007 | B1 |
7278055 | Talugon et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7337221 | Radi et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7340535 | Alam | Mar 2008 | B1 |
7376125 | Hussain et al. | May 2008 | B1 |
7376827 | Jiao | May 2008 | B1 |
7386010 | Solomon et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7389358 | Matthews | Jun 2008 | B1 |
7499398 | Damon et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7499419 | Balay et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7522604 | Hussain et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7574495 | Rajagopalan | Aug 2009 | B1 |
7639632 | Sarkar et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7668087 | Hussain et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7801155 | Wang | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7881244 | Balay et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7885207 | Sarkar et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
8213347 | Balay et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8320279 | Sarkar et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8369258 | Balay et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8848718 | Hussain et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8953513 | Balay et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
9185050 | Desai et al. | Nov 2015 | B2 |
20010043571 | Jang et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010048661 | Clear et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20010052013 | Munguia et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020062344 | Ylonen et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020066034 | Schlossberg et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020075901 | Perlmutter et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020099849 | Alfieri et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020099972 | Walsh, Jr. et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020116529 | Hayden | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020145981 | Klinker et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020152373 | Sun | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020186661 | Santiago et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020191604 | Mitchell et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030033401 | Poisson et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030063348 | Posey | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030081559 | Matuoka | May 2003 | A1 |
20030091021 | Trossen et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030093557 | Giraud et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030108041 | Aysan et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030115308 | Best et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030117954 | De Neve et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030120806 | Clune et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030131228 | Tworney | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030169747 | Wang | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030174650 | Shankar et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030185221 | Deikman et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030200295 | Roberts et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030212735 | Hicok et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030223361 | Hussain et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030223406 | Balay | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040006601 | Bernstein et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040037279 | Zelig | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040042416 | Ngo et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040078772 | Balay | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040095934 | Cheng et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040141521 | George | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20050047407 | Desai | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050083927 | Lien et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050147095 | Guerrero et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050163115 | Dontu et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20060087969 | Santiago et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060265519 | Millet | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070058648 | Millet | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070064704 | Balay | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070073733 | Matthews | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070083528 | Matthews et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070104119 | Sarkar | May 2007 | A1 |
20070109968 | Hussain | May 2007 | A1 |
20070110062 | Balay et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070115979 | Balay | May 2007 | A1 |
20070121579 | Matthews | May 2007 | A1 |
20070127382 | Hussain | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070147368 | Desai | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070237172 | Zelig et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070291755 | Cheng et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080013470 | Kopplin | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080016389 | Talugon | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080025214 | Bettink et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080049760 | Bergeron | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080112318 | Groleau et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20090225754 | Balay et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090225759 | Hussain et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20100094980 | Sarkar et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100142527 | Balay et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20110122872 | Balay et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20130156033 | Balay et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0051290 | Aug 2000 | WO |
0076152 | Dec 2000 | WO |
0163809 | Aug 2001 | WO |
0223855 | Mar 2002 | WO |
03010323 | Dec 2003 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Notice of Allowance dated Jun. 27, 2005 for U.S. Appl. No. 10/232,979. |
Notice of Allowance dated Jul. 5, 2007 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/466,098. |
Office Action dated May 22, 2006 for U.S. Appl. No. 10/163,261. |
Notice of Allowance dated Jul. 27, 2006 for U.S. Appl. No. 10/163,073. |
Office Action dated May 30, 2007 for U.S. Appl. No. 10/273,669. |
Office Action dated Sep. 21, 2006 for U.S. Appl. No. 10/273,669. |
Office Action dated Feb. 21, 2006 for U.S. Appl. No. 10/273,669. |
Notice of Allowance dated Aug. 14, 2007 for U.S. Appl. No. 10/163,071. |
Office Action dated Jul. 3, 2007 for U.S. Appl. No. 10/163,071. |
Office Action dated Aug. 1, 2007 for U.S. Appl. No. 10/163,260. |
Office Action dated Apr. 13, 2007 for U.S. Appl. No. 10/163,260. |
Office Action dated Dec. 21, 2006 for U.S. Appl. No. 10/163,260. |
Office Action dated May 18, 2006 for U.S. Appl. No. 10/163,260. |
Office Action dated Sep. 11, 2007 for U.S. Appl. No. 09/661,637. |
Office Action dated Feb. 8, 2007 for U.S. Appl. No. 09/661,637. |
Office Action dated Dec. 23, 2004 for U.S. Appl. No. 09/661,637. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 09/952,520, dated May 30, 2008. |
Fowler, D., “VPNs Become a Virtual Reality.” Netnews, Apr./May 1998. pp. 1-4. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/556,697, dated Jul. 9, 2008. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 09/663,457, dated Jul. 15, 2008. |
Restriction Requirement for U.S. Appl. No. 10/991,970, dated Jul. 15, 2008. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/650,298, mailing date Sep. 3, 2008. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/991,969, mailing date Sep. 22, 2008. |
Chan, Mun C. et al., “An architecture for broadband virtual networks under customer control.” IEEE Network Operations and Management Symposium. Apr. 1996. pp. 135-144. |
Chan, Mun C. et al “Customer Management and Control of Broadband VPN Services.” Proc. Fifth IFIP/IEEE International Symposium of Integrated Network Management. May 1997. pp. 301-314. |
Gasparro, D.M., “Next-Gen VPNs: The Design Challenge.” Data Communications. Sep. 1999. pp. 83-95. |
Hanaki, M. et al., “LAN/WAN management integration using ATM CNM interface.” IEEE Network Operations Management Symposium, vol. 1. Apr. 1996. pp. 12-21. |
Kapustka, S., “CoSine Communications Move VPNs ‘Into the Cloud’ with the Leading Managed IP Service Delivery Platform.” http://wwwcosinecom.com/news/pr—5—24.html. Press Release, CoSine Communications. 1995. p. 5. |
Keshav, S., “An Engineering Approach to Computer Networking: ATM networks, the internet, and the telephone network.” Reading Mass: Addison-Wesley, Addison-Wesley Professional Computing Series. 1992. pp. 318-324. |
Kim, E.C. et al., “The Multi-Layer VPN Management Architecture.” Proc. Sixth IFIP/IEEE International Symposium on Integrated Network Management. May 1999. pp. 187-200. |
Rao, J.R., Intranets and VPNs: Strategic Approach. 1988 Annual Review of Communications. 1998. pp. 669-674. |
Tanenbaum, A.S., “Computer Networks.” Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Prentice Hall PTR, 3rd Edition. 1996. pp. 348-364. |
European Search Report for PCT/US03/37009 (Jul. 4, 2004) 2 pgs. |
International Search Report for PCTUS03/17674. 6 pgs. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 12/328,858 mailing date May 25, 2012. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 112/328,858, mailing date Dec. 6, 2011. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 112/328,858, mailing date Apr. 15, 2011. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 10/949,943 mailing date Jan. 9, 2009. |
Non-Final Rejection for U.S. Appl. No. 10/949,943 mailing date Feb. 14, 2008. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 12/467,304 mailing date Dec. 13, 2010. |
Non-Final Rejection for U.S. Appl. No. 12/467,304 mailing date Oct. 18, 2010. |
Tsiang et al. “RFC 2892, The Cisco SRP MAC Layer Protocol.” Aug. 2000, pp. 1-52. |
Zhang et al. “Token Ring Arbitration Circuits for Dynamic Priority Algorithms” IEEE, 1995, pp. 74-77. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/015,880 mailing date Dec. 5, 2012. |
Non-Final Rejection for for U.S. Appl. No. 13/015,880 mailing date Oct. 2, 2012. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/756,071 mailing date Jun. 30, 2014. |
Non-Final Rejection for U.S. Appl. No. 13/756,071 mailing date Jun. 6, 2014. |
Lawrence, J. Lang et al.“Connecting Remote FDDI Installations with Single-Mode Fiber, Dedicated Lines, or SMDS.” Jul. 1990; ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review. vol. 20, Issue 3; pp. 72-82. |
IEEE Potentials Publication; “Local Area Networks” Dec. 1995/Jan. 1996; pp. 6. http://www.ece.uc.edu/-paw/potentials/sample. |
Office Action dated Oct. 18, 2007 for U.S. Appl. No. 09/663,483. |
Office Action dated Oct. 16, 2007 for U.S. Appl. No. 09/661,130. |
Office Action dated Nov. 28, 2007 for U.S. Appl. No. 09/952,520. |
Notice of Allowance dated Dec. 1, 2004 for U.S. Appl. No. 09/661,636. |
Office Action dated May 28, 2004 for U.S. Appl. No. 09/661,636. |
Office Action dated Nov. 18, 2003 U.S. Appl. No. 09/661,636. |
Office Action dated Dec. 28, 2006 for U.S. Appl. No. 09/661,130. |
Office Action dated Oct. 18, 2004 for U.S. Appl. No. 09/661,130. |
Office Action dated Nov. 5, 2003 for U.S. Appl. No. 09/661,130. |
Notice of Allowance dated Jun. 14, 2007 for U.S. Appl. No. 10/067,106. |
Office Action dated Nov. 16, 2006 for U.S. Appl. No. 10/067,106. |
Office Action dated Jun. 3, 2004 for U.S. Appl. No. 09/663,483. |
Office Action dated Aug. 21, 2003 for U.S. Appl. No. 09/663,483. |
Office Action dated May 5, 2004 for U.S. Appl. No. 09/661,637. |
Notice of Allowance dated Jul. 30, 2007 for U.S. Appl. No. 09/663,485. |
Office Action dated Jan. 11, 2007 for U.S. Appl. No. 09/663,485. |
Office Action dated Dec. 21, 2004 for U.S. Appl. No. 09/663,485. |
Office Action dated May 14, 2004 for U.S. Appl. No. 09/663,485. |
Office Action dated Sep. 8, 2003 for U.S. Appl. No. 09/663,485. |
Office Action dated Aug. 8, 2007 for U.S. Appl. No. 09/663,457. |
Office Action dated May 17, 2007 for U.S. Appl. No. 09/663,457. |
Office Action dated Apr. 22, 2005 for U.S. Appl. No. 09/663,457. |
Office Action dated Aug. 27, 2004 for U.S. Appl. No. 09/663,457. |
Office Action dated Dec. 11, 2003 for U.S. Appl. No. 09/663,457. |
Notice of Allowance dated Nov. 21, 2006 for U.S. Appl. No. 09/663,484. |
Office Action dated Feb. 24, 2006 for U.S. Appl. No. 09/663,484. |
Office Action dated Apr. 6, 2005 for U.S. Appl. No. 09/663,484. |
Office Action dated May 6, 2004 for U.S. Appl. No. 09/663,484. |
Office Action dated Aug. 12, 2003 for U.S. Appl. No. 09/663,484. |
Notice of Allowance dated Jan. 4, 2007 for U.S. Appl. No. 09/894,471. |
Office Action dated Oct. 26, 2006 for U.S. Appl. No. 09/894,471. |
Office Action dated Dec. 14, 2004 for U.S. Appl. No. 09/894,471. |
Notice of Allowance dated Nov. 7, 2006 for U.S. Appl. No. 09/771,346. |
Office Action dated Jul. 18, 2006 for U.S. Appl. No. 09/771,346. |
Office Action dated Jan. 25, 2005 for U.S. Appl. No. 09/771,346. |
Office Action dated Mar. 26, 2004 for U.S. Appl. No. 09/771,346. |
Notice of Allowance dated Nov. 19, 2006 for U.S. Appl. No. 10/163,162. |
Office Action dated May 5, 2006 for U.S. Appl. No. 10/163,162. |
Notice of Allowance dated Jan. 4, 2007 for U.S. Appl. No. 10/163,261. |
Office Action dated Nov. 3, 2006 for U.S. Appl. No. 10/163,261. |
Office Action dated Nov. 7, 2006 for U.S. Appl. No. 10/163,071. |
Office Action dated Jun. 1, 2006 for U.S. Appl. No. 10/163,071. |
Office Action dated Dec. 2, 2005 for U.S. Appl. No. 10/163,071. |
Notice of Allowance dated Nov. 29, 2006 for U.S. Appl. No. 10/163,079. |
Office Action dated Oct. 27, 2006 for U.S. Appl. No. 10/163,079. |
Office Action dated May 17, 2006 for U.S. Appl. No. 10/163,079. |
Notice of Allowance dated Jul. 17, 2007 for U.S. Appl. No. 10/298,815. |
Office Action dated Feb. 23, 2007 for U.S. Appl. No. 10/298,815. |
Non-Final Rejection for U.S. Appl. No. 14/633,981 mailed Feb. 11, 2016. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20160020994 A1 | Jan 2016 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10949943 | Sep 2004 | US |
Child | 12328858 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 14714270 | May 2015 | US |
Child | 14866898 | US | |
Parent | 14616521 | Feb 2015 | US |
Child | 14714270 | US | |
Parent | 13756071 | Jan 2013 | US |
Child | 14616521 | US | |
Parent | 13015880 | Jan 2011 | US |
Child | 13756071 | US | |
Parent | 12328858 | Feb 2009 | US |
Child | 13015880 | US |