A claim of priority is made to Korean Patent Application No. 10-2005-0022929, filed on Mar. 19, 2005, in the Korean Intellectual Property Office, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein in its entirety by reference.
1. Field of the Invention
Example embodiments of the present invention generally relate to cryptographic apparatuses and methods. More particularly, example embodiments of the present invention relate to scalar multiplication apparatuses and methods of using the same.
2. Description of the Related Art
To solve problems associated with modem confidential data communications, for example, satisfy continuous growing performance requirements hardware, cryptographic systems based on well-known crypto-algorithms may used. Crypto-algorithms, public key algorithms, such as Rivest-Shamir-Adleman (RSA) and Elliptic Curve Cryptography (ECC), and symmetric key algorithms, such as Data Encryption Standard (DES) and Advanced Encryption Standard (AES), are well known.
However, in addition to hardware-oriented crypto-systems, new crypto-analysis methods such as Side-Channel Analysis (SCA) have been developed. There may be several different techniques of attacks, including Timing Analysis, Power Analysis, Electro-Magnetic Analysis, and Different Faults Analysis (DFA). These techniques may successfully attack the crypto-systems and obtain secret keys with less time and effort.
Accordingly, counter-measurements against the crypto-analysis methods such as SCA have developed. An example of SCA technique is DFA.
For a crypto-system such as a smart card system including the conventional art cryptographic apparatus 100, a cryptanalyst (attacker) may deliberately generate a fault, such as power glitches, electromagnetic influences or optical influences, during the scalar multiplication computation, generate the same encrypted output points as that generated by the parallel EC operation units 120 and 130, and may analyze faulty output points and obtain a secret key used by the system. An attacker may easily obtain confidential information in the conventional cryptographic methods by simply checking output points encrypted in parallel. In addition, it is known that the conventional art cryptographic methods may be weak to counter a Sign Change Fault (SCF) attack against a Non-Adjacent Form (NAF)-based scalar multiplication algorithm.
In an example embodiment of the present invention, a scalar multiplication apparatus includes at least two encryptors each adapted to receive an input point and a secret key to generate an output point, a first logic circuit adapted to receive the first and second encrypted output points to perform a first logic operation, and a second logic circuit adapted to receive the first logic operation result of the first logic circuit and the secret key to perform a second logic operation.
In another example embodiment of the present invention, a scalar multiplication apparatus includes a first encryptor adapted to receive an input point and a secret key to generate a first encrypted output point, a second encryptor adapted to receive the first encrypted output point and the secret key to perform an inverse operation and generate a second encrypted output point, a first XOR circuit adapted to receive the input point and second encrypted output point to perform a first XOR operation, and a second logic circuit adapted to receive the first logic operation result of the first logic circuit and the secret key to perform a second logic operation.
Also in another example embodiment of the present invention, a scalar multiplication method includes receiving an input point and a secret key, generating a first encrypted output point and a second encrypted output point from the input point and the secret key, performing a first logic operation on the first encrypted output point and the second encrypted output point, and performing a second logic operation on the first logic operation result and the secret key.
In another example embodiment of the present invention, a scalar multiplication method includes receiving an input point and an input secret key, generating an encrypted first output point from the input point and a secret key, generating an encrypted second output point from the encrypted first output point and the secret key by performing an inverse operation, performing a first logic operation on the input point and the encrypted second output point, and performing a second logic operation on the first logic operation result and the secret key.
The present invention will become more apparent with the descriptions of example embodiments thereof with reference to the attached drawings in which:
Hereinafter, example embodiments of the present invention will be described in detail with reference to the accompanying drawings. Like reference numbers are used to refer to like elements through at the drawings.
An elliptic curve E is a set of points (x,y) which satisfy the elliptic curve (EC) operation (Equation 1) in the Weierstrass form:
E: y2+a1xy+a3y=x3+a2x2+a4x+a6 (1)
For cryptographic applications, the EC may be used over a prime finite field GF(p) or a binary finite field GF(2n). Here, GF( ) denotes a Galois field, a prime finite field is a field containing a prime number of elements, and a binary finite field is a field containing 2n elements.
If p is an odd prime number, then there is a unique field GF(p) with p elements. For the prime finite field case, Equation 1 is changed to:
If n≧1,then there is a unique field GF(2n) with 2n elements. For the binary finite field case, Equation 1 is:
The elliptic curves have the point addition operation, and in special circumstance the point doubling operation occur in the following. To get the resulted point R=P+Q=(x3, y3) from two points P=(x1, y1) and Q=(x2, y2), it is requested to perform the next finite field operation in GF(p):
When it is the point doubling operation (P=Q), then the next finite field operation (Equation 5) should be performed in GF(p):
Equations 4 and 5 are the same as Equations 6 and 7 in the case of the binary finite field GF(2n).
An operation in the Elliptic Curve Cryptography (ECC) may be a scalar point multiplication which may include computing Q=k·P=P+P+. . . +P (k times), where k is a secret key. The scalar point multiplication may be based on point operations, which in turn are based on finite field operations, as illustrated in the above Equations. A related operation may be the discrete logarithm, which may include computing k from P and Q=k·P.
There may be different possible representations of the point (dot) on the EC besides the Affine representation (used in the above equations), for example, Ordinary Projective, Jacobian Projective, Lopez-Dahab Projective, Hessian, etc. In example embodiments of the present invention, point representations in the Weierstrass Affine such as Equations 1 to 7 may be considered. However, a scalar multiplication apparatus and method are not limited thereto and may be applied to any type of finite field and/or point representation.
An attacker may deliberately induce faults, for example, power glitches, electromagnetic influences or optical influences, during the scalar multiplication operation in ECC and analyze faulty output data. In a DFA process, the attacker may induce a fault to the input point P in a crypto-system and obtain a faulty output point {tilde over (Q)}=k·{tilde over (P)}. The attacker may define a cryptographically weak elliptic curve (EC) {tilde over (E)}≠E, on which the faulty output point exists, e.g., {tilde over (Q)}ε{tilde over (E)}. The attacker may try to solve a discrete logarithm problem, which includes computing k from {tilde over (P)} and {tilde over (Q)}=k·{tilde over (P)} on the cryptographically weak EC {tilde over (E)}≠E. By repeating the above procedures, the attacker may obtain the secret key included in the crypto-system.
In example embodiments of the present invention, instead of a secret key but a modified secret key may be obtained by DFA attacks. That is, although the attacker may solve the discrete logarithm problem by deliberately inducing DFA attack, {tilde over (Q)}={tilde over (k)}·{tilde over (P)} instead of {tilde over (Q)}=k·{tilde over (P)} may be output as the modified output point. Accordingly, the attacker may only obtain a modified secret key {tilde over (k)} instead of the real secret key k.
Each of the first and second encryptors 210 and 220 may receive EC domain parameters from a protected non-volatile memory (not shown) (S31 of
Each of the first and second encryptors 210 and 220 may receive the input point P to be encrypted (S32 of
The first encryptor 210 may generate an output point Q′ from the input point P (allocated as the output point Q in operations S33 of
In operations S37 of
According to the above description, if no fault is induced in the first and second encryptors 210 and 220, the output points Q′ and Q″ of the first and second encryptors 210 and 220 may be considered to be the same, and the operation result of the second XOR circuit 240 maintains the input secret key value k. However, if a fault is induced to the first encryptor 210 or the second encryptor 220, the operation result of the second XOR circuit 240 may be a modified secret key value {tilde over (k)}≠k.
It may be assumed that the attacker cannot induce the same fault to both the first encryptor 210 and the second encryptor 220 regardless of whether the first encryptor 210 and the second encryptor 220 are performed in EC parallel or sequential operation.
If the scalar multiplication operation ends (S38 of
In an example embodiment, the original secret key value k may be substituted by the modified secret key value {tilde over (k)}≠k by performing at least one point addition operation and at least one point doubling operation after a fault induction against the DFA attacks. As a result, the faulty data may be diffused, and the attacker cannot easily obtain the secret key k.
In the sequential processing method illustrated in
To counter this possibility, an inverse EC operation fINV recovering the original input point P from the EC operation result Q may be used. A scalar multiplication apparatus 500 according to an example embodiment of the present invention is illustrated in
Each of the first encryptors 510 may receive EC domain parameters from a protected non-volatile memory (not shown) in operation S61. Encryptors 510 may receive the input point P to be encrypted in operation S62 and allocate the input point P as a point Q in operation S63. Each of the first and second encryptors 510 and 520 may also receive a (modified) secret key k from the protected non-volatile memory in operation S64.
The first encryptor 510 may generate an encrypted output point Q′ from the input point P (allocated as the resulted point Q in operation S63) and the (modified) secret key k output from the second XOR circuit 540 to perform an EC operation Q′=f(k,Q,a,b,p|n) using the EC domain parameters in operation S65.
The second encryptor 520 may generate an output point Q″ from the output point Q′ and the (modified) secret key k output from the second XOR circuit 540 by performing an inverse EC operation Q″=fINV(k,Q′,a,b,p|n) opposite to the EC operation of the first encryptor 510 using the EC domain parameters in operation S66.
In operation S67, the first XOR circuit 530 may perform an XOR operation of the input point P (allocated as the resulted point Q in operation S63) and the output point Q″ of the second encryptor 520. Also, in operation S67, the second XOR circuit 540 may perform an XOR operation of the operation result of the first XOR circuit 530 and the input secret key k, and generate the XOR operation result as the (modified) secret key k input to the first and second encryptors 510 and 520.
If no fault is induced in the first and second encryptors 510 and 520, the output point Q″ of the second encryptor 520 may be equal to the input point P, and the operation result of the second XOR circuit 540 maintains the input secret key value k. However, if a fault is induced in the first encryptor 510 or the second encryptor 520, the operation result of the second XOR circuit 540 may be a modified secret key value {tilde over (k)}≠k.
If the scalar multiplication operation ends in operation S68, the encrypted output point Q=k·P or Q={tilde over (k)}·P may be output from the first encryptor 510 or the second encryptor 520 to a post-processor in an upper layer in operation S69. If the scalar multiplication operation does not end, the first and second encryptors 510 and 520 may repeatedly perform the EC operation using the modified secret key value k output from the second XOR circuit 540.
Referring to
Referring to
As shown in
Each of the first encryptor 910 and the second encryptor 920 may generate an encrypted output point from an input point P by performing the EC operation. For example, each of the first encryptor 910 and the second encryptor 920 may generate an encrypted output point for a second operation from the encrypted output point of a first operation by performing the EC operation. The operation may be consecutively performed for at least two operations.
The first XOR circuit 930 may perform XOR operations of the encrypted output points generated for respective operations of the first encryptor 910 and the encrypted output points generated for respective operations of the second encryptor 920. The second XOR circuit 940 may perform an XOR operation of the operation results of the first XOR circuit 930 and a secret key k, and generate the XOR operation result as the (modified) secret key k input to the first and second encryptors 910 and 920.
The first XOR circuit 1030 may perform XOR operations of the encrypted output points generated for respective operations of the first encryptor 1010, the encrypted output points generated for respective operations of the second encryptor 1020, and the random number data RND
Each of the first encryptor 1110 may generate an encrypted output point from an input point P by performing the EC operation. The first encryptor 1110 may generate an encrypted output point for a subsequent round from the encrypted output point of a previous round by performing the EC operation. The operation may be consecutively performed for at least two operations. The second encryptor 1120 may generate an encrypted output point for each round from an output point of a corresponding round of the first encryptor 1110 by performing the inverse EC operation.
The first XOR circuit 1130 may perform XOR operations of the encrypted output points generated for respective operations of the first encryptor 1110 and the encrypted output points generated for respective operations of the second encryptor 1120. The second XOR circuit 1140 may perform an XOR operation of the operation results of the first XOR circuit 1130 and a secret key k to generate the XOR operation result as the (modified) secret key k input to the first and second encryptors 1110 and 1120.
The first XOR circuit 1230 may perform XOR operations of the encrypted output points generated for respective operations of the first encryptor 1210, the encrypted output points generated for respective operations of the second encryptor 1220, and the random number data RND
As described above, the scalar multiplication apparatuses 200, 500, 700, 800, 900, 1000, 1100 and 1200 may modify the original secret key value k to the modified key value {tilde over (k)}≠k when a fault occurs in the scalar multiplication computation process. As a result, the original secret key value k may not be divulged.
For example embodiments of the present invention may be written as computer programs and may be implemented in general-use digital computers that execute the programs using a computer-readable recording medium. Examples of the computer-readable recording medium may include magnetic storage media (e.g., ROM, floppy disks, hard disks, etc.), optical recording media (e.g., CD-ROMs, DVDs, etc.), and storage media such as carrier waves (e.g., transmission through the internet). The computer-readable recording medium may also be distributed over networks coupled computer systems so that the computer-readable code is stored and executed in a distributed fashion.
As described above, in a scalar multiplication apparatus and method according to example embodiments of the present invention, XOR operations are performed prior to a final output, and no fault check is performed in an output process where the secret key may be vulnerable to attack. Accordingly, it may be advantageous for the scalar multiplication apparatus and method to be applied to a crypto-system requiring DFA attack-resistance and/or a quick operational speed. In addition, the scalar multiplication apparatus and method may be applied to counter SCA attacks against a (Non Adjacent Form) NAF-based scalar multiplication algorithm. Moreover, the scalar multiplication apparatus and method may be easily adapted to all kinds of cryptographic algorithms using a symmetry key or an asymmetry key through a small modification.
While the present invention has been particularly shown and described with reference to example embodiments thereof, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that various changes in form and details may be made therein without departing from the scope of the present invention. The above-described embodiments should be considered in a descriptive sense only and are not for purposes of limitation.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
10-2005-0022929 | Mar 2005 | KR | national |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4635223 | Boone et al. | Jan 1987 | A |
5307409 | Driscoll | Apr 1994 | A |
6108419 | LaMacchia et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6141420 | Vanstone et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6144740 | Laih et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
7309004 | Muschellack et al. | Dec 2007 | B1 |
20010048742 | Handschuh | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20040234073 | Sato et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050031121 | Lee | Feb 2005 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1 296 224 | Mar 2003 | EP |
1548687 | Jun 2005 | EP |
2 422 693 | Aug 2006 | GB |
2003-216026 | Jul 2003 | JP |
2003-255831 | Sep 2003 | JP |
WO 2006010692 | Feb 2006 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20060212506 A1 | Sep 2006 | US |