Some flatbed scanners have scan modules that have a short depth of field, for example a scan module that uses a Contact Image Sensor (CIS). The short depth of field requires close alignment between the scanning module and the scanning glass. One method used to maintain the alignment between the scanning module and the scanning glass is to allow the scanning module to ride on or reference the underside of the scanning glass. Many scanners come equipped with an Automatic Document Feeder (ADF). The most common type of ADF uses a second scan window. Typically a second piece of glass is used for the second scan window. When scanning with the ADF, the scanning module is moved underneath the second piece of glass.
The two pair of wheels are mounted to the scanner module 102, one wheel of each pair mounted on each side of the scanner module 102. In this example the wheels are mounted on a common axis of rotation. The outer pair of wheels 106 have a first diameter and the inner pair of wheels 104 have a second diameter. In this example the outer wheels 106 have a smaller diameter than the inner wheels 104. Whenever the scanner module is performing a scan, the pair of inner wheels are resting on the underside of either the ADF glass 110 or the flatbed glass 108. Scanner module 102 is biased upwards (in direction 116) towards the top cover 118 to maintain good contact between the inner pair of wheels 104 and the underside of the glass.
Scanner 100 has two types of scans, one type of scan is an ADF scan and the other type of scan is a flatbed scan. During an ADF scan the scanner module 102 is positioned under the ADF glass with the inner set of wheels resting on the bottom of the ADF glass 110. The object to be scanned is moved past the scanner module along the top surface of the ADF glass 110.
During a flatbed scan the object to be scanned is placed onto the top of flatbed glass 108 and the scan module 102 moves in the Y axis along the length of the flatbed glass 108. As the scanner module moves during the flatbed scan, the pair of inner wheels 104 roll along on the underside of the flatbed glass 108. In each type of scan, the distance between the object to be scanned and the scanner module 102 is controlled by the thickness of the glass and the diameter of the inner wheels. By referencing the scanner module directly to the scanner glass, the mechanical tolerance stack is kept to a minimum and the overall stiffness of the scanner may be reduced. In some examples, the axis of rotation for the two pair of wheels is aligned to the scan line of the scanner module 102.
When switching between a flatbed scan and an ADF scan the scanner module 102 needs to cross over gap 114. The two ramps 112 are located at each end of gap 114. The two ramps 112 are aligned with the outer pair of wheels 106. As scanner module 102 moves from the flatbed glass 108 towards the ADF glass 110, the outer pair of wheels 106 engage the two ramps 112. As the outer pair of wheels 106 engage the two ramps 112, the inner pair of wheels 104 are lifted away from the flatbed glass 108. As the scanner module reaches the other side of gap 114, the outer pair of wheels disengage with the two ramps 112 and the inner set of wheels are lowered onto the bottom surface of the ADF glass 110.
In one example embodiment of the invention, the ADF glass 110 may be of a different thickness than the flatbed glass 108. For the case of the ADF glass being thinner than the flatbed glass, the two ramps 112 may extend from the gap between the two glasses, all the way to the ADF scanning position. The scanner module 102 would still have the outer pair of wheels 106 riding on the top surface of the two ramps 112 when the scanner module 102 is in the ADF scan position. By remaining on the ramps 112, the scanner module would be located at a different height from the top surfaces of the ADF glass 110 as compared to the height from the top surface of the flatbed glass 108. The change in the height of the scanner module with respect to the top surface of the ADF glass would compensate for the different thickness of the ADF glass 110 and would maintain the proper focus of the scanner module onto the top surface of the ADF glass 110. Therefore the optical path length in the ADF scan position would still be equal to the optical path length in the flatbed scan position.
In the examples describe above, the inner pair of wheels 104 were larger than the outer pair of wheels 106. However, in other example embodiments of the invention, the wheel diameters could be swapped and the ramp height adjusted accordingly.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4152962 | Hendrischk | May 1979 | A |
4231562 | Hori | Nov 1980 | A |
4834557 | Dreinhoff | May 1989 | A |
4846589 | Chikuma et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
5875376 | Chou | Feb 1999 | A |
7016088 | Yokota et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7755810 | Kuse | Jul 2010 | B2 |
8223406 | Osakabe | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8300282 | Nakakita et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
20030081268 | Hirayama | May 2003 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
59126525 | Jul 1984 | JP |
62025741 | Feb 1987 | JP |
62109472 | Jul 1987 | JP |
11178309 | Jul 1999 | JP |
2008203679 | Sep 2008 | JP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130016407 A1 | Jan 2013 | US |