Millimeter-wave image-based synthetic vision systems (SVS) for aircraft landing may require a +/−15 degree linearly scanning antenna in the azimuth direction, with an update rate of 100 ms or faster at 94 GHz. Conventional mechanical scanning assemblies using a crank rocker driver will provide an undesirable sinusoidal profile and can be bulky and not suitable for small platforms, which require a small compact assembly.
In an embodiment, a reflector assembly implementable in a scanning antenna assembly having a stationary surface includes a support assembly coupled to the stationary surface, a substantially planar first reflector panel coupled to the support assembly so as to enable rotation of the first reflector panel about a central axis of the first reflector panel, and an actuator assembly comprising a translating arm coupled to the first reflector panel, wherein translational motion of the arm is operable to rotate the first reflector panel about the central axis back and forth through a predetermined angular range at a predetermined frequency.
Preferred and alternative embodiments of the present invention are described in detail below with reference to the following drawings.
An embodiment includes a scalable linear scanning antenna, which may be a preferred solution for many platforms including small bizjets to meet size, weight, power, and production cost constraints.
An embodiment of the invention addresses the linear scanning profile in a compact, scalable mechanical scanning antenna using friction driven piezo electric motors. With the friction driven motors placed at the optimum location, the scanning mechanism can be very compact, and the design is scalable for different aperture sizes and scan rate. The piezo electric motor is very small and multiple motors can be used for higher torque if needed. Operating as a close-loop system, the antenna beam position is precisely controlled with an angular positional feedback optical encoder. Using a PID controller, the scanning profile is fully programmable. Instead of the normal sinusoidal profile, one can program an arbitrary profile to meet the specific system requirement. The friction drive mechanism can absorb high shocks and self-recover in rough take-offs and landings.
As discussed in greater detail below, an antenna according to an embodiment may include a feedhorn, a main parabolic reflector, and a scanning small, light-weight sub-reflector. In such a design, a horizontal polarized wave radiates from the feedhorn placed at the focal point of the parabolic reflector, is reflected, and becomes a vertically polarized wave, so as to pass through the main reflector with minimum loss. By rotating the sub-reflector, the beam will move in the same direction with twice the amplitude. Scanning can be accomplished by moving, in a linear fashion, the sub-reflector using, for example, compact friction-driven motors.
Referring to
An actuator assembly 140 is coupled to the reflector panel 130. In the illustrated embodiment, and as further illustrated in
The arm 160 generally includes a traction surface, such as a strip of ceramic material, that is operated on by the motors 150a, 150b to move the arm 160 relative to the motors 150a, 150b. The encoder sensor 180 is used to determine the angular position of the substantially planar reflector panel 130 relative to the motors 150a, 150b. In accordance with an embodiment of the present invention, the encoder sensor 180 is a high-resolution angular positional feedback optical encoder.
As best shown in
As an alternative to a dual mode standing wave motor, the piezoelectric linear motors 150a, 150b may comprise direct drive piezoelectric motors. Other motors 150a, 150b capable of providing the required repeatability include, but are not limited to, ceramic piezoelectric motors using lead screws.
Referring now to
Referring to
As illustrated in
While a preferred embodiment of the invention has been illustrated and described, as noted above, many changes can be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. Accordingly, the scope of the invention is not limited by the disclosure of the preferred embodiment. Instead, the invention should be determined entirely by reference to the claims that follow.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2531454 | Marshall | Nov 1950 | A |
2595271 | Kline | May 1952 | A |
4070678 | Smedes | Jan 1978 | A |
4193693 | Frosch et al. | Mar 1980 | A |
4665401 | Garrard | May 1987 | A |
5021798 | Ubhayakar | Jun 1991 | A |
5319379 | Waken et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
6307522 | Alexanian | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6359599 | Apostolos | Mar 2002 | B2 |
6769194 | Hennessey | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6856277 | Katayama et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6965784 | Kanamaluru et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
7474254 | White et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0235932 | Sep 1987 | EP |
0065370 | Nov 2000 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Wolfgang Menzel et al., A 77-GHz FM/CW Radar Front-End with a Low-Profile Low-Loss Printed Antenna, IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, vol. 47, No. 12, Dec. 1999, pp. 2237-2241. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100066620 A1 | Mar 2010 | US |