The present invention relates to a dimensioner device that uses image processing to measure the physical size of an object. More particularly, a method and apparatus is provided for determining if a scene has changed indicating respective movement between a camera and a measurement platform.
A fixed-position package dimensioner is used to measure the X, Y and Z dimensions of an object such as a package. To provide accuracy, such a dimensioner assumes a static relationship between a camera and a plane upon which objects such as parcels are placed. Once this relationship is established, translation or rotation of the camera will usually lead to under/over estimates of a parcel's size. Likewise, the reference plane (e.g., a scale or platform) against which the dimensioner measures packages cannot usually move without introducing error. In other words, the sensors and reference plane should not move relative to each other after initialization. Independent movement of parts within the system can lead to poor accuracy of measurements of packages in all dimensions.
If a user intentionally moves the sensors to change the view of the scene, for example, previous knowledge about the reference plane becomes invalid. The user may not even be aware that changing a sensor's pose will invalidate the original setup and reduce measuring accuracy.
The user may also be unaware that the dimensioning system hardware has moved. Movement could be very gradual over time, due to, for example, a loose mounting bracket and vibration or jarring. A sensor on a wire or pole could slide slightly over time or be accidently bumped out of position.
Therefore, a need exists for an automated process of re-discovering a reference plane when initial alignment has been disturbed.
Accordingly, in one aspect, the present invention embraces a package dimensioner. Change in the pose of the package dimensioner is detected by background modeling the area of a measurement platform and then determining if a number of points in a scene are different in distance from the background model. Change in the pose can also be detected by comparing a count of support points in a 3D container generated from images taken in a training process with a count of support points in a subsequent images and determining how many support points are different.
In an example embodiment, a method of detecting a change in the pose of a package dimensioning system relative to its operating environment involves: initializing the dimensioning system by: at a range camera, capturing one or more initial reference images of a measurement platform and surrounding area; at a processor: generating a reference depth map from each initial reference image; generating and storing to a memory a background model from the captured initial reference depth maps; testing the dimensioning system for a scene change by: at the range camera, capturing a subsequent image of the measurement platform and surrounding area; at the processor: generating a current depth map from the subsequent image; comparing each pixel of the current depth map with a corresponding pixel of the background model; counting a number of pixels Pv of the current depth map that differ absolutely from the reference depth map by more than the prescribed threshold THRESH1, and if the number of pixels Pv is greater than a threshold THRESH2, determining that a significant change in the image has occurred.
In certain illustrative embodiments, the testing is carried out on a periodic basis. In certain illustrative embodiments, the process further involves executing a dimensioning process to measure the dimensions of an object on the measurement platform. In certain illustrative embodiments, the testing is carried out whenever a prescribed period of inactivity in measuring dimensions of an object on the measurement platform. In certain illustrative embodiments, the testing is carried out prior to each measurement of dimensions of an object on the measurement platform. In certain illustrative embodiments, the process further involves generating an alert upon determining that a significant scene change has occurred. In certain illustrative embodiments, upon determining that a significant scene change has occurred, repeating the initializing.
In another example embodiment, a dimensioning system has a measurement platform. A range camera is mounted so as to capture an image of the measurement platform and surrounding area. A processor is programmed to carry out the following actions: initialize the dimensioning system by: receiving one or more initial reference images of the measurement platform and surrounding area from the range camera; generating and storing to a memory a background model from the one or more captured initial reference images; test the dimensioning system for a scene change by: receiving a subsequent image of the platform area from the range camera; generating a current depth map from the subsequent image; comparing each pixel of the current depth map with a corresponding pixel of the background model; counting a number of pixels Pv of the current depth map that differ absolutely from the reference depth map by more than the prescribed threshold THRESH1, and if the number of pixels Pv is greater than a threshold THRESH2, determining that a significant change in the image has occurred.
In certain illustrative embodiments, the testing is carried out on a periodic basis. In certain illustrative embodiments, the process further involves 9. The system according to claim 7, further comprising the processor executing a dimensioning process to measure dimensions of an object on the measurement platform. In certain illustrative embodiments, the testing is carried out whenever a prescribed period of inactivity in measuring dimensions of an object on the measurement platform. In certain illustrative embodiments, the testing is carried out prior to each measurement of dimensions of an object on the measurement platform. In certain illustrative embodiments, the processor generates an alert upon determining that a significant scene change has occurred. In certain illustrative embodiments, upon determining that a significant scene change has occurred, the processor repeats the initializing.
In another example embodiment, a method of detecting a change in the pose of a package dimensioning system relative to its operating environment involves: initializing the dimensioning system by: at a range camera, capturing an initial reference image of a measurement platform and surrounding area; at a processor, generating a three-dimensional container around the platform and storing the container to memory; at the processor, determining a count of the support points in the container from the reference image; testing the dimensioning system for a scene change by: at the range camera, capturing a subsequent image of the measurement platform and surrounding area; at the processor: counting support points in the subsequent image that are in the container; comparing the count of support points in the container in the subsequent image with the count of support points in the container in the reference image; based on the comparison, determining if a prescribed difference in the counts is present. Determining that a prescribed difference in the counts exists which establishes that a significant scene change has occurred.
In certain illustrative embodiments, the testing is carried out on a periodic basis. In certain illustrative embodiments, the process further involves executing a dimensioning process to measure dimensions of an object on the platform. In certain illustrative embodiments, the testing is carried out whenever a prescribed period of inactivity in measuring dimensions of an object on the measurement platform. In certain illustrative embodiments, the testing is carried out prior to each measurement of dimensions of an object on the measurement platform. In certain illustrative embodiments, the process further involves generating an alert upon determining that a significant scene change has occurred. In certain illustrative embodiments, the container comprises a right prism with a base approximating a convex polygon, where the base is parallel to a congruent convex polygon that bounds the measurement platform, and where the prism's height equals twice a maximum support distance. In certain illustrative embodiments, the container comprises a right cylinder with a circular base, where the base is parallel to a congruent circle that bounds the measurement platform, and where the cylinder's height equals twice the maximum support distance. In certain illustrative embodiments, when a significant scene change is deemed to have occurred, searching the scene for the measurement platform at a location coplanar therewith. In certain illustrative embodiments, upon determining that a significant scene change has occurred, the process involves repeating the initializing.
In a further example embodiment, a dimensioning system has: a measurement platform. A range camera is mounted so as to capture an image of the measurement platform and surrounding area. A processor is programmed to carry out the following actions: initialize the dimensioning system by: receiving an initial reference image of a platform area from the range camera; generating a three-dimensional container around the measurement platform and storing the container to memory; determining a count of the support points in the container from the reference image; test the dimensioning system for a scene change by: receiving a subsequent image of the measurement platform and surrounding area from the range camera; counting support points in the subsequent image that are in the container; comparing the count of support points in the container in the subsequent image with the count of support points in the container in the reference image; based on the comparison, determining if a prescribed difference in the counts of support points is present; and upon determining that a prescribed difference in the counts exists which establishes that a significant scene change has occurred.
In certain illustrative embodiments, the testing is carried out on a periodic basis. In certain illustrative embodiments, the process further involves executing a dimensioning process to measure dimensions of an object on the measurement platform. In certain illustrative embodiments, the testing is carried out whenever a prescribed period of inactivity in measuring dimensions of an object on the measurement platform. In certain illustrative embodiments, the testing is carried out prior to each measurement of dimensions of an object on the measurement platform. In certain illustrative embodiments, the process further involves generating an alert upon determining that a significant scene change has occurred. In certain illustrative embodiments, the container comprises a right prism with a base approximating a convex polygon, where the base is parallel to a congruent convex polygon that bounds the measurement platform, and where the prism's height equals twice the maximum support distance. In certain illustrative embodiments, the container comprises a right cylinder with a circular base, where the base is parallel to a congruent circle that bounds the measurement platform, and where the cylinder's height equals twice the maximum support distance. In certain illustrative embodiments, when a significant scene change is deemed to have occurred, searching the scene for the measurement platform at a location coplanar therewith. In certain illustrative embodiments, when a significant scene change has been established to have occurred, the processor further repeats the initialization.
The foregoing illustrative summary, as well as other exemplary objectives and/or advantages of the invention, and the manner in which the same are accomplished, are further explained within the following detailed description and its accompanying drawings.
The embodiments consistent with the present invention embrace several methods and apparatus for detecting that a dimensioner is out of alignment by virtue of movement of a component of the system with respect to other components of the system.
For purposes of this document, the term “Mixture of Gaussians” refers to methods of background modeling. Single-channel grayscale images, RGB images, or depth images could be used (depth images contain Z-values observed at each pixel location). Each pixel location has one or more associated Gaussian (Normal) probability distributions (Gaussians) based on the observed intensities. The multiple Gaussians are mixed together to form joint distributions. The Gaussians can be dynamic; new ones can be added, or they could merge, or the mean (mu) and standard deviation (sigma) can change.
The term “support points” means three dimensional (XYZ) points that contribute to the definition of some geometric shape. Support points for a plane are points in 3D space detected by the system which are very close (in distance) to a reference plane. A threshold distance (for example, a few centimeters) defines how close a point must be to the geometric surface for the point to be considered supporting point. A three dimensional support point in the scene contributes to the equation for a three dimensional reference plane. The point “supports” the reference plane in that the point is relatively close to the reference plane and is used in fitting the plane (i.e., determining a location of the reference plane in 3D space). For purposes of this document, a support point is within a threshold absolute distance from the plane, such as a maximum of e.g., 2 cm. away orthogonally. Also, the approximated surface normal at the support point is near the surface normal of the platform's plane (with a maximum threshold angle of for example a few degrees between 3D normal vectors). A support point approximates a true point somewhere on the plane, but due to noise, the support point may be slightly above or below the true plane of the reference plane.
In one embodiment, the processor may use a combination of RANSAC (random sample consensus) and least squares fitting to find a three-dimensional plane that approximates the platform's top surface. In RANSAC, the processor builds a large number of random planes and outputs the plane with the largest number of support points. In each iteration of RANSAC, the processor chooses three three-dimensional points randomly from the set of points in the scene and constructs a plane through the points. The processor then counts the number of support points from the scene that are near the plane within a threshold distance. Finally, given the plane with the largest number of support points and the list of support points, the processor fits a new plane through the support points using least squares.
The term “convex hull” means a mathematically constructed polygon in three dimensional space that describes the outermost extent of the platform/scale. By “convex,” the polygon doesn't have any “dents” where successive vertices change from a counter-clockwise to a clockwise orientation or vice-versa. The convex hull generally has a small number of vertices, all of which are coplanar in 3D.
The term “platform” or “measurement platform” is used to mean a reference plane for dimensioning such as a floor or table/counter top surface or a weight scale top surface.
The term “prism” is used to mean a mathematically constructed structure that uses shifted copies of the convex hull as bases. The convex hull is shifted up along the platform's normal vector to form the top base, and the convex hull is shifted down in the opposite direction of the platform's normal vector to form the lower base. The height of the prism is often only a few centimeters and is meant to contain the support points near the actual platform. In this manner, walls are mathematically constructed normal to the convex hull to define a space bordered by the platform. In this document, the prism can essentially be considered a bounding container (a mathematical construct—not an actual physical container) around the platform. The container could be a “right prism” with bases that are polygons and segments representing height that are perpendicular to the bases. Or, the container could be a “right cylinder” with circular or elliptical bases. In all cases, the prism represents a shell around a polygon representing the platform that is flat in 3D space. A height (e.g., +/−2 cm) is added to form the prism or cylinder.
In accord with certain embodiments a mechanism is provided to detect when a camera forming a part of a dimensioning system has moved—perhaps even by a small amount—and alert the user and/or shut down dimensioning operations until a re-initialization is completed to account for the movement. In the present document, “movement” means that the camera or platform is moved with respect to one another such that the image registered to the camera is changed from that image used in the initialization of the dimensioning system.
Further, minor changes in the scene that are not problematic should preferably be ignored if they do not significantly disturb the sensor-platform pose. For instance, if a user places a very large package in the scene that consumes most of a sensor's view, the system should not generate an alarm for a significant, global change. Correspondingly, the detection module should avoid false alarms in order not to annoy the user or to render the system unusable for its intended purpose.
Movement of components in a dimensioner system can be inhibited by incorporating physical restraints (to prevent motion of the camera with respect to the platform). Also, paper seals can be used to provide an indication of when such motion has taken place. But, additional physical sealing may unnecessarily increase product cost, and may need to be customized for conformity with local metrological certification rules. Relative to this, an algorithmic approach does not add to the hardware cost and is consistent with the certification rules in that it renders the system inoperable when it is unable to produce an accurate result. Of course, physical restraints and seals can also be used in conjunction with the techniques disclosed herein.
Turning now to
A range camera 14 such as that depicted in
Range cameras such as 14 are commercially available or can be custom built. It is desirable for enhancement of accuracy for the range camera to have a wide viewing angle and be able to focus on the objects that are being measured (e.g., within about 0.5 to 4.0 meters in certain example embodiments). It is also desirable for the camera to have a large baseline D (e.g., between about 8 and about 25 cm), since larger baselines will produce greater accuracy.
In each case of the present system, when the system is turned on an “initialization phase” starts the process. During the initialization phase, the user selects a platform (e.g., a scale). This can be done by presenting an image from the RGB camera 38 of camera 14 and requesting the user to indicate a location on the platform, e.g. by clicking a mouse when the pointer is on the platform or tapping the platform on a touch-screen display. Other methods may occur to those skilled in the art upon consideration of the present teachings.
Two separate example methods for detecting a moved sensor and/or platform are provided by way of example herein, but the invention itself is not to be constrained by the details of the techniques disclosed. In each case, when it is established that a significant scene change has occurred, any number of actions can be carried out including, but not limited to providing an audible or visual alert to the user and/or repeating the initialization phase to account for the change in pose.
Background Model Example
In one implementation, background modeling is used to detect a changed scene. In the background model example, the system prompts the user to select the platform during initialization phase. The depth maps are used to train a background model. While testing a new scene, the already captured background model is compared to a depth map of a current image. Such a depth map may contain information for 100,000 pixels in one example. The system then classifies the pixels in the image as foreground if the depth value for that pixel is significantly different from the corresponding depth of the trained background model. If most of the test scene is classified as foreground, then the system determines that the camera or platform has been moved (or that there has otherwise been a significant scene change).
Once movement of camera or platform is detected, the system acquires a new platform location. The system finds the new location of platform by searching for the largest plane that is coincident with the previous plane as defined by a planar equation of the platform. The planar parameters can then be adjusted according to the newly obtained location. In addition, the system may wait for a fixed amount of time before alerting the user regarding any relative movement between the camera and the platform so as to avoid false alerts.
If the relative position of the camera and platform changes significantly, the camera's current images should vary significantly from images captured during an initialization phase of operation of the system.
The system captures, via camera 14, at least one depth map containing depth (or Z-values in X,Y,Z geometry) in a regular matrix (forming a range image). The depth map(s) is used to train a background model at 120 by generating per-pixel statistical (e.g., Gaussian) distributions consistent with the captured depth map for a collection of successive captured images from camera 14. This trained background model represents a depth map of the environment of the platform as the platform appeared at the time when the system was trained at 120.
Training the background model involves an initial training phase of a blank scene and then continual updates, even when testing. Generally, the background model of an empty scene (containing the platform but no parcel) is trained for e.g., 5 to 10 minutes at startup. Then, during testing, the processor will find foreground objects that violate the background model and will also adapt/update the model. The initial training and update phases essentially make similar changes to the background model, but the update phase ignores foreground ‘blobs’ and doesn't update the model for points where foreground was detected.
Initial training of the background model is carried out by placing the camera in a fixed position, such as on a tripod or a rigid mount. A plurality of frames is obtained from the camera for at least about 30 seconds. The scene should contain minimal disruptions like people walking through it. Then, one of the following processes is carried out for each frame:
1) Assuming use of depth maps (a regular matrix of depth values for each pixel), the frame will be a regular matrix with a depth value (e.g., expressed in mm) or disparity value at each pixel location.
2) Assuming use of a “mixture of Gaussians” model, each training frame is used to update a Gaussian model for each pixel location. Distributions could merge together, or new ones can be created. The mean and standard deviation is then updated for each Gaussian model for each pixel.
Once the background model is trained at 120, the system can begin operation to measure objects placed upon the platform (or placed upon a scale on the platform) in a dimensioning loop 124.
It is desirable to frequently check the alignment of the system to assure that the camera to platform orientation (the “pose”) has not changed. This is done in a “testing phase”. In certain example embodiments, this is checked at three different instances. A check can be done 1) prior to each parcel measurement, 2) after a periodic downtime has been reached (i.e., time between measurements), and 3) on a strictly periodic basis. Many variations will occur to those skilled in the art upon consideration of the present teachings.
During the testing phase, at each test frame, the background model is updated, skipping updates for foreground regions. Just as in the initialization phase, the statistics (e.g., the Gaussians) can be updated. Foreground objects left stationary for a long time will eventually become background as a result of these updates. The example system uses a maximum number of old frames that are stored as history and older frames are eventually deleted. For certain example implementations, the system “forgets” frames that were captured more than about 10,000 frames ago. In one example system, frames are captured at about 10 frames per second.
In the present example embodiment, at 128 a downtime timer Td is set prior to the first measurement along with a periodic timer Tp as indicated at 128. At 132, a new frame is received from camera 14. At 134, the user can start a new measurement by initiating a command to the user interface 30 at 136. When this happens, the system first runs a check (by going into a testing phase) to assure that there has been no movement to disturb alignment of the system. This occurs at 140 and 144 where the system checks to see if a large number (as defined by a threshold) of variations are present from the background model trained at 120. A first threshold THRESH1 defines the maximum distance between the current value of a pixel's depth and the value in the background model. The distance in this case is unsigned since it is of no concern about whether the distance is closer or farther from the camera, the only thing of relevance is how far away the depth is from the corresponding depth in the background model. Thus, if a pixel's depth value differs from the background model by a distance greater than THRESH1, the variation is deemed to be large enough to be considered a variation from the background model. The number of such variations are counted to produce a count PV and PV is compared to a second threshold THRESH2 to determine if there is great enough variation to judge that there has been a change in the “pose” of the system.
When carrying out this test at 140 and 144, the current depth map is compared to the depth map representing the background model. The system classifies a pixel as foreground if its depth value differs from the trained value by more than THRESH1 (for example if the difference is greater than about 5-20 mm in one example). If a large amount of the current depth map is classified as foreground points (e.g., if the number of points Pv is greater than THRESH2), then it can be concluded that the camera probably moved or the alignment of the system otherwise changed. Thus, at 144, the number of foreground points Pf is compared to a threshold THRESH2 to determine if there has been movement or not if the number of foreground points is greater than THRESH2. In one illustrative example, the value of THRESH2 can be set at about 75-95% of the total number of points.
Using depth maps in background modeling is a method that is robust against shadows and other lighting changes. It is noted that RGB/gray images can also be used in a background model. In addition, the background models of this example are not adaptive, but could be modified to adapt them to accept long-term changes, like a newly introduced, semi-permanent object, into the background model.
If, at 144, the system determines that the threshold THRESH2 has not been exceeded and the system has not been moved, the user can be prompted to place a parcel or other object to be measured on the platform at 148. The package can then be measured by the system at 152 and the results displayed or otherwise used (e.g., as input to a point of sale system) at 156 and the downtime timer Td is reset at 160.
If the user is between measurements and has not generated an instruction indicating that the measurement is to start at 138 for a time Td (e.g., for example 15 to 30 minutes), the process 100 goes to 164 to check to see if the downtime timer Td has expired. If Td has not expired, the process returns to 132 to await the next frame from the camera. If Td has expired, the timer Td is reset at 168 and a process identical to that defined at 140 and 144 is started at 172 and 176 to assure that the system is in alignment. At 144 or 176, if the process detects that there has been a camera movement or other change that affects alignment, the process generates an alert at 180 to make the user aware that the system is out of alignment and that an alignment initialization process is to be initiated. This alert can be an audible or visual alert that is intended to get the user's attention. The process then returns to an earlier point in the process such as 108 to begin an alignment re-initialization of the system.
In addition to the downtime timer, a periodic timer can be used to check the calibration on a regular basis (e.g., for example every 15 minutes). If the timer Tp has not expired at 164, the system checks to see if the periodic timer Tp has expired at 184. If not, the process awaits a new frame from the camera 14 at 132. If timer Tp has expired, the periodic timer Tp is reset at 188 and control passes to 172.
At 210, a test of the current scene is initiated in which a new depth map is created for the current scene. This new depth map is compared with the trained background model (i.e., a reference depth map created at the time of initialization of the system). At 214, each pixel of the new depth map is compared to the corresponding pixel of the trained background model and if the value differs greatly (for example, if the pixel differs by more than THRESH1), then the new pixel is classified as a foreground pixel 218. Otherwise, the pixel will be classified as a background pixel 222. The number of foreground points and background points Pv are counted at 226 and the number of foreground points is compared to a threshold THRESH2 at 230. If the number of foreground points is greater than THRESH2, then the system deems that a change (movement) has been detected at 234 and a new initialization and training process is initiated. If no movement is detected at 238, the system is deemed to be in condition to make dimensioning measurements. In example embodiments, the values of THRESH1 and THRESH2 can likely be optimized for any given dimensioning setup and system. Many variations will occur to those skilled in the art upon consideration of the present teachings.
When background modeling is used for the present system, a few possible models can be considered. A single range image from range camera 14 can be used for the model and the process can determine the difference between the test image and the trained reference images to find foreground. When using one range image for the background model, in one implementation, a distance threshold THRESH1 of 5 mm and a threshold foreground percentage THRESH 2 of 90% can be used. In other words, any new depth value that differs from the corresponding trained depth value by more than a threshold (e.g., 5 mm in one example) is deemed foreground, and if more than 90% of pixels are foreground in one example, then the camera or platform is deemed to have moved.
In another example, a single Gaussian at each pixel location can be used and trained with perhaps a few minutes (e.g., 1-5 minutes) of frames of a blank scene. Each pixel has one Normal distribution of depths with a mean value and standard deviation value. When testing, standard Z values can be computed over the scene. Absolute Z-values surpassing some threshold, like for example three standard deviations, could be deemed foreground. Many variations are possible without deviating from the principles described herein.
Complex Hull Example
In another implementation, referred to as the complex hull method, the dimensioning system 10 checks to determine whether or not the platform remains in the location where it was first imaged by use of a complex hull as defined above.
In this example, the system prompts the user to select the platform during initialization phase in the same manner previously described. Then, a convex hull is built around the selected platform. The convex hull contains the supporting points for the platform. While testing a new scene, the quantity of support points within a prism or cylinder is calculated using the original platform's convex hull as a reference end of the prism or cylinder. If too few or too many of the support points exist in the hull, then the system concludes that the platform or the camera has been moved. Further, the system waits for a fixed amount of time (e.g., 5 seconds), to raise an alarm upon detection of relative movement between camera and platform. Once the movement of camera or platform is detected, the system acquires the new platform location. The system finds the new location of the platform by searching for the largest plane that is approximately coincident with the previous planar equation of the platform and adjusts the planar parameters according to the newly obtained location.
A process 300 representing this example implementation is depicted in
During the initialization phase at 312, the platform is found in an initial image captured by camera 14. The processor 26 then computes a “convex hull” around the platform. This convex hull should contain support points for the platform (as defined above). As explained above, the convex hull is essentially a polygon in three dimensions, but which is approximately coincident with the reference plane of the platform.
When the prism has been defined by the system at 312, the user may be prompted to approve the identified platform at 324 and if the user does not approve, he or she again selects the platform at 308 and the complex hull is again identified and the prism walls constructed at 312.
Once the user approves the proper selection of the platform at 324, the system is ready to carry out the dimensioning process which operates as a continuous loop at 328. As in the prior example, this example is shown to have three separate timing arrangements to do a scene change test upon the dimensioning system. To accomplish this, timers Tp and Td are set at 332 and a new frame is received from camera 14 at 336.
The user can start a new measurement at 340 to dimension a parcel or other object. But until such measurement is initiated at 340, the system checks the status of the downtime timer Td at 342. If Td has not expired at 342, the periodic timer Tp is checked at 344. If Tp has not expired, the process returns to 336. If the downtime timer Td has expired at 342 it is reset at 348 and control passes to 350. Similarly, if the periodic timer Tp has expired at 344, it is reset at 352 and control passes to 350. In either case, at 350, the number of points is counted in the prism and if this number differs significantly from the count obtained from the originally established trained reference prism, a significant scene change will be deemed to have occurred. This determination is made at 354 where the system determines if the count is within a suitable range based on a computation at 350 which determines a ratio R of the reference count to the current count. This reference can be deemed to represent no significant change if the value of this ratio (Pv) is between a lower acceptable ratio and a higher acceptable ratio (e.g., for example 0.8<Pv<1.25). If Pv is within this range at 354, no movement is deemed to have taken place and the process returns to 336. But, if the value of Pv is outside this range at 354, a significant scene change is deemed to have occurred and an alert is issued at 358 to the user so that the system can be reinitialized starting at 308.
Whenever a user wishes to measure a parcel or other object at 340 and initiates such process, another initial check is carried out starting at 362 which carries out the same process as 350. A decision is made at 366 whether or not Pv is within range and if not, control passes to 358 to alert the user and re-initialize the system. If no scene change is detected (no movement) at 366, the user is prompted to place the object on the platform at 370 and the parcel is measured at 374. Results can be displayed at 378 or other appropriate action (e.g., transferring data to a point of sale terminal or other system) and the downtime timer is reset at 382. Control then passes back to 336.
When testing the current scene, support points are identified near the original plane (e.g., within a few mm) according to the planar equation that defines the complex hull. The quantity of support points within the “prism” is counted using the original platform's convex hull as a base. If many support points are found to still exist in the convex hull, then the platform and/or camera can be deemed to have not moved. Otherwise, the user can be alerted of a changed pose in the dimensioning system. Once relative movement between the camera and platform is detected, the user is directed to re-find the platform. The old platform is invalid, so the process of reporting dimensions of packages is immediately halted.
In one implementation, the process attempts to reacquire the platform as discussed above. Reacquisition assumes the original planar equation is still valid, but the platform has simply moved with the same plane. For example, a user may move a scale to another location on a countertop, but the scale's planar equation is still valid, so the process can try to find the new location of the scale. In one method, the process finds the largest plane that is approximately coincident with the previous plane, and it ensures the new quantity of support points is similar (e.g., within a threshold) to the original count. The process can then appropriately adjust the planar parameters.
Downtime can be established by determining if the user has not measured anything in X seconds. Likewise, if an RGB frame of the scene has not changed significantly in X seconds, the system could run check. It is desirable to find downtimes when the user is not actively measuring so that the integrity of the alignment can be confirmed with minimal disturbance of the user's operation of the dimensioner.
Referring now to
It is noted that the lower and upper thresholds can be adjusted and optimized so as to establish how much change can be tolerated within the bounds of what would be considered significant and cause to halt measurements until a re-initialization can be carried out. Changes in lighting, movement within the camera's view (e.g., hands passing over the platform, etc.) can contribute to noise that is accounted for in part by the range between the thresholds.
In the implementation of finding support points for the original planar equation, a small point-to-plane distance threshold was used. For instance, a point may be deemed to exist in the original plane's support if its distance from the plane is less than about 20 mm. The corresponding convex prism is short in height, perhaps having a height of as much as about twice this maximum distance (i.e., 2*20=40 mm).
In certain implementations, a countdown timer can be used for concluding that the camera actually moved. The system should observe a significantly changed scene for X seconds before concluding that the camera/platform changed pose. After the countdown expires, the process changes to the phase of requiring the user to select the reference plane again. This countdown helps to further prevent false alarms and by calling for a sustained change to the scene before producing a “camera moved” alarm. For example, a user may place a large package in the scene that violates the background model, but if he/she removes it before the countdown expires, then the system will not throw an alarm. In practice, a countdown of several minutes (e.g., 5-10 minutes) was found to be appropriate to provide a good balance between false alarms and accurate dimensioning. Many variations and modifications will occur to those skilled in the art upon consideration of the present teachings.
To supplement the present disclosure, this application incorporates entirely by reference the following commonly assigned patents, patent application publications, and patent applications:
In the specification and/or figures, typical embodiments of the invention have been disclosed. The present invention is not limited to such exemplary embodiments. The use of the term “and/or” includes any and all combinations of one or more of the associated listed items. The figures are schematic representations and so are not necessarily drawn to scale. Unless otherwise noted, specific terms have been used in a generic and descriptive sense and not for purposes of limitation.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3971065 | Bayer | Jul 1976 | A |
4026031 | Siddall et al. | May 1977 | A |
4279328 | Ahlbom | Jul 1981 | A |
4398811 | Nishioka et al. | Aug 1983 | A |
4495559 | Gelatt, Jr. | Jan 1985 | A |
4730190 | Win et al. | Mar 1988 | A |
4803639 | Steele et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
5184733 | Amarson et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
5198648 | Hibbard | Mar 1993 | A |
5220536 | Stringer et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5331118 | Jensen | Jul 1994 | A |
5359185 | Hanson | Oct 1994 | A |
5384901 | Glassner et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5548707 | LoNegro et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5555090 | Schmutz | Sep 1996 | A |
5561526 | Huber et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5590060 | Granville et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5606534 | Stringer et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5619245 | Kessler et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5655095 | LoNegro et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5661561 | Wurz et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5699161 | Woodworth | Dec 1997 | A |
5729750 | Ishida | Mar 1998 | A |
5730252 | Herbinet | Mar 1998 | A |
5732147 | Tao | Mar 1998 | A |
5734476 | Dlugos | Mar 1998 | A |
5737074 | Haga et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5748199 | Palm | May 1998 | A |
5767962 | Suzuki et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5831737 | Stringer et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5850370 | Stringer et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5850490 | Johnson | Dec 1998 | A |
5869827 | Rando | Feb 1999 | A |
5870220 | Migdal et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5900611 | Hecht | May 1999 | A |
5923428 | Woodworth | Jul 1999 | A |
5929856 | LoNegro et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5938710 | Lanza et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5959568 | Woolley | Sep 1999 | A |
5960098 | Tao | Sep 1999 | A |
5969823 | Wurz et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5978512 | Kim et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5979760 | Freyman et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5988862 | Kacyra et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5991041 | Woodworth | Nov 1999 | A |
6009189 | Schaack | Dec 1999 | A |
6025847 | Marks | Feb 2000 | A |
6035067 | Ponticos | Mar 2000 | A |
6049386 | Stringer et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6053409 | Brobst et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6064759 | Buckley et al. | May 2000 | A |
6067110 | Nonaka et al. | May 2000 | A |
6069696 | McQueen et al. | May 2000 | A |
6115114 | Berg et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6137577 | Woodworth | Oct 2000 | A |
6177999 | Wurz et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6189223 | Haug | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6232597 | Kley | May 2001 | B1 |
6236403 | Chaki | May 2001 | B1 |
6246468 | Dimsdale | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6333749 | Reinhardt et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6336587 | He et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6369401 | Lee | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6373579 | Ober et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6429803 | Kumar | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6457642 | Good et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6507406 | Yagi et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6517004 | Good et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6519550 | D'Hooge et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6535776 | Tobin et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6674904 | McQueen | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6705526 | Zhu et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6781621 | Gobush et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6824058 | Patel et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6832725 | Gardiner et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6858857 | Pease et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6922632 | Foxlin | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6971580 | Zhu et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6995762 | Pavlidis et al. | Feb 2006 | B1 |
7057632 | Yamawaki et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7085409 | Sawhney et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7086162 | Tyroler | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7104453 | Zhu et al. | Sep 2006 | B1 |
7128266 | Zhu et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7137556 | Bonner et al. | Nov 2006 | B1 |
7159783 | Walczyk et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7161688 | Bonner et al. | Jan 2007 | B1 |
7205529 | Andersen et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7214954 | Schopp | May 2007 | B2 |
7277187 | Smith et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7307653 | Dutta | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7310431 | Gokturk et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7353137 | Vock et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7413127 | Ehrhart et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7509529 | Colucci et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7527205 | Zhu | May 2009 | B2 |
7586049 | Wurz | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7602404 | Reinhardt et al. | Oct 2009 | B1 |
7639722 | Paxton et al. | Dec 2009 | B1 |
7726575 | Wang et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7780084 | Zhang et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7788883 | Buckley et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7974025 | Topliss | Jul 2011 | B2 |
8027096 | Feng et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8028501 | Buckley et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8050461 | Shpunt et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8055061 | Katano | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8072581 | Breiholz | Dec 2011 | B1 |
8102395 | Kondo et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8132728 | Dwinell et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8134717 | Pangrazio et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8149224 | Kuo et al. | Apr 2012 | B1 |
8194097 | Xiao et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8201737 | Palacios Durazo et al. | Jun 2012 | B1 |
8212158 | Wiest | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8212889 | Chanas et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8228510 | Pangrazio et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8230367 | Bell et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8294969 | Plesko | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8305458 | Hara | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8310656 | Zalewski | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8313380 | Zalewski et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8317105 | Kotlarsky et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8322622 | Liu | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8339462 | Stec et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8350959 | Topliss et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8351670 | Ijiri et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8366005 | Kotlarsky et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8371507 | Haggerty et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8376233 | Van Horn et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8381976 | Mohideen et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8381979 | Franz | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8390909 | Plesko | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8408464 | Zhu et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8408468 | Horn et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8408469 | Good | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8424768 | Rueblinger et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8437539 | Komatsu et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
8441749 | Brown et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
8448863 | Xian et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
8457013 | Essinger et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8459557 | Havens et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8463079 | Ackley et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8469272 | Kearney | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8474712 | Kearney et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8479992 | Kotlarsky et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8490877 | Kearney | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8517271 | Kotlarsky et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8523076 | Good | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8528818 | Ehrhart et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8544737 | Gomez et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8548420 | Grunow et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8550335 | Samek et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8550354 | Gannon et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8550357 | Kearney | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8556174 | Kosecki et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8556176 | Van Horn et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8556177 | Hussey et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8559767 | Barber et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8561895 | Gomez et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8561903 | Sauerwein | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8561905 | Edmonds et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8565107 | Pease et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8570343 | Halstead | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8571307 | Li et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8576390 | Nunnink | Nov 2013 | B1 |
8579200 | Samek et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8583924 | Caballero et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8584945 | Wang et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8587595 | Wang | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8587697 | Hussey et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8588869 | Sauerwein et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8590789 | Nahill et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8594425 | Gurman et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8596539 | Havens et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8596542 | Havens et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8596543 | Havens et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8599271 | Havens et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8599957 | Peake et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8600158 | Li et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8600167 | Showering | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8602309 | Longacre et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8608053 | Meier et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8608071 | Liu et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8611309 | Wang et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8615487 | Gomez et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8621123 | Caballero | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8622303 | Meier et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8628013 | Ding | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8628015 | Wang et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8628016 | Winegar | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8629926 | Wang | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8630491 | Longacre et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8635309 | Berthiaume et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8636200 | Kearney | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8636212 | Nahill et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8636215 | Ding et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8636224 | Wang | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8638806 | Wang et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8640958 | Lu et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8640960 | Wang et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8643717 | Li et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8646692 | Meier et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8646694 | Wang et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8657200 | Ren et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8659397 | Vargo et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8668149 | Good | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8678285 | Kearney | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8678286 | Smith et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8682077 | Longacre | Mar 2014 | B1 |
D702237 | Oberpriller et al. | Apr 2014 | S |
8687282 | Feng et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8692927 | Pease et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8695880 | Bremer et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8698949 | Grunow et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8702000 | Barber et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8717494 | Gannon | May 2014 | B2 |
8720783 | Biss et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
8723804 | Fletcher et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
8723904 | Marty et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
8727223 | Wang | May 2014 | B2 |
8740082 | Wilz | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8740085 | Furlong et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8746563 | Hennick et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8750445 | Peake et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8752766 | Xian et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8756059 | Braho et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8757495 | Qu et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8760563 | Koziol et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8763909 | Reed et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8777108 | Coyle | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8777109 | Oberpriller et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8779898 | Havens et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8781520 | Payne et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8783573 | Havens et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8789757 | Barten | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8789758 | Hawley et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8789759 | Xian et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8792688 | Unsworth | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8794520 | Wang et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8794522 | Ehrhart | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8794525 | Amundsen et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8794526 | Wang et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8798367 | Ellis | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8807431 | Wang et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8807432 | Van Horn et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8810779 | Hilde | Aug 2014 | B1 |
8820630 | Qu et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8822848 | Meagher | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8824692 | Sheerin et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8824696 | Braho | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8842849 | Wahl et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8844822 | Kotlarsky et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8844823 | Fritz et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8849019 | Li et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
D716285 | Chaney et al. | Oct 2014 | S |
8851383 | Yeakley et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8854633 | Laffargue | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8866963 | Grunow et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8868421 | Braho et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8868519 | Maloy et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8868802 | Barten | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8868803 | Caballero | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8870074 | Gannon | Oct 2014 | B1 |
8879639 | Sauerwein | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8880426 | Smith | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8881983 | Havens et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8881987 | Wang | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8897596 | Passmore et al. | Nov 2014 | B1 |
8903172 | Smith | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8908995 | Benos et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8910870 | Li et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8910875 | Ren et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8914290 | Hendrickson et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8914788 | Pettinelli et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8915439 | Feng et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8915444 | Havens et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8916789 | Woodburn | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8918250 | Hollifield | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8918564 | Caballero | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8925818 | Kosecki et al. | Jan 2015 | B2 |
8928896 | Kennington et al. | Jan 2015 | B2 |
8939374 | Jovanovski et al. | Jan 2015 | B2 |
8942480 | Ellis | Jan 2015 | B2 |
8944313 | Williams et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
8944327 | Meier et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
8944332 | Harding et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
8950678 | Germaine et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
D723560 | Zhou et al. | Mar 2015 | S |
8967468 | Gomez et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
8971346 | Sevier | Mar 2015 | B2 |
8976030 | Cunningham et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
8976368 | Akel et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
8978981 | Guan | Mar 2015 | B2 |
8978983 | Bremer et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
8978984 | Hennick et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
8985456 | Zhu et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
8985457 | Soule et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
8985459 | Kearney et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
8985461 | Gelay et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
8988578 | Showering | Mar 2015 | B2 |
8988590 | Gillet et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
8991704 | Hopper et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
8996194 | Davis et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
8996384 | Funyak et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
8998091 | Edmonds et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9002641 | Showering | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9007368 | Laffargue et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9010641 | Qu et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9014441 | Truyen et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9015513 | Murawski et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9016576 | Brady et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
D730357 | Fitch et al. | May 2015 | S |
9022288 | Nahill et al. | May 2015 | B2 |
9030964 | Essinger et al. | May 2015 | B2 |
9033240 | Smith et al. | May 2015 | B2 |
9033242 | Gillet et al. | May 2015 | B2 |
9036054 | Koziol et al. | May 2015 | B2 |
9037344 | Chamberlin | May 2015 | B2 |
9038911 | Xian et al. | May 2015 | B2 |
9038915 | Smith | May 2015 | B2 |
D730901 | Oberpriller et al. | Jun 2015 | S |
D730902 | Fitch et al. | Jun 2015 | S |
D733112 | Chaney et al. | Jun 2015 | S |
9047098 | Barten | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9047359 | Caballero et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9047420 | Caballero | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9047525 | Barber | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9047531 | Showering et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9049640 | Wang et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9053055 | Caballero | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9053378 | Hou et al. | Jun 2015 | B1 |
9053380 | Xian et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9057641 | Amundsen et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9058526 | Powilleit | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9064165 | Havens et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9064167 | Xian et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9064168 | Todeschini et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9064254 | Todeschini et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9066032 | Wang | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9070032 | Corcoran | Jun 2015 | B2 |
D734339 | Zhou et al. | Jul 2015 | S |
D734751 | Oberpriller et al. | Jul 2015 | S |
9082023 | Feng et al. | Jul 2015 | B2 |
9082195 | Holeva et al. | Jul 2015 | B2 |
9142035 | Rotman | Sep 2015 | B1 |
9171278 | Kong et al. | Oct 2015 | B1 |
9224022 | Ackley et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9224027 | Van Horn et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
D747321 | London et al. | Jan 2016 | S |
9230140 | Ackley | Jan 2016 | B1 |
9233470 | Bradski et al. | Jan 2016 | B1 |
9235899 | Kirmani et al. | Jan 2016 | B1 |
9443123 | Hejl | Jan 2016 | B2 |
9250712 | Todeschini | Feb 2016 | B1 |
9258033 | Showering | Feb 2016 | B2 |
9262633 | Todeschini et al. | Feb 2016 | B1 |
9299013 | Curlander et al. | Mar 2016 | B1 |
9310609 | Rueblinger et al. | Apr 2016 | B2 |
D757009 | Oberpriller et al. | May 2016 | S |
9342724 | McCloskey et al. | May 2016 | B2 |
9375945 | Bowles | Jun 2016 | B1 |
D760719 | Zhou et al. | Jul 2016 | S |
9390596 | Todeschini | Jul 2016 | B1 |
D762604 | Fitch et al. | Aug 2016 | S |
D762647 | Fitch et al. | Aug 2016 | S |
9412242 | Van Horn et al. | Aug 2016 | B2 |
9424749 | Reed et al. | Aug 2016 | B1 |
D766244 | Zhou et al. | Sep 2016 | S |
9443222 | Singel et al. | Sep 2016 | B2 |
9478113 | Xie et al. | Oct 2016 | B2 |
9486921 | Straszheim et al. | Nov 2016 | B1 |
9828223 | Svensson et al. | Nov 2017 | B2 |
20010027995 | Patel et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010032879 | He et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20020054289 | Thibault et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020067855 | Chiu et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020109835 | Goetz | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020118874 | Chung et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020158873 | Williamson | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020167677 | Okada et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020179708 | Zhu et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020196534 | Lizotte et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030038179 | Tsikos et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030053513 | Vatan et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030063086 | Baumberg | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030078755 | Leutz et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030091227 | Chang et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030156756 | Gokturk et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030197138 | Pease et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030225712 | Cooper et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030235331 | Kawaike et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040008259 | Gokturk et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040019274 | Galloway et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040024754 | Mane et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040066329 | Zeitfuss et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040073359 | Ichijo et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040083025 | Yamanouchi et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040089482 | Ramsden et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040098146 | Katae et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040105580 | Hager et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040118928 | Patel et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040122779 | Stickler et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040132297 | Baba et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040155975 | Hart et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040165090 | Ning | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040184041 | Schopp | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040211836 | Patel et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040214623 | Takahashi et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040233461 | Armstrong et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040258353 | Gluckstad et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050006477 | Patel | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050117215 | Lange | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050128193 | Popescu et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050128196 | Popescu et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050168488 | Montague | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050211782 | Martin | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050257748 | Kriesel et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050264867 | Cho et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060047704 | Gopalakrishnan | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060078226 | Zhou | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060108266 | Bowers et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060112023 | Horhann | May 2006 | A1 |
20060151604 | Zhu et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060159307 | Anderson et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060159344 | Shao et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060213999 | Wang et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060230640 | Chen | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060232681 | Okada | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060255150 | Longacre | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060269165 | Viswanathan | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060291719 | Ikeda et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070003154 | Sun et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070025612 | Iwasaki et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070031064 | Zhao | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070063048 | Havens et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070116357 | Dewaele | May 2007 | A1 |
20070127022 | Cohen et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070143082 | Degnan | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070153293 | Gruhlke et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070171220 | Kriveshko | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070177011 | Lewin et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070181685 | Zhu et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070237356 | Dwinell et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070291031 | Konev et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070299338 | Stevick et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080013793 | Hillis et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080035390 | Wurz | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080056536 | Hildreth et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080062164 | Bassi et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080077265 | Boyden | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080079955 | Storm | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080164074 | Wurz | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080204476 | Montague | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080212168 | Olmstead et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080247635 | Davis et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080273191 | Kim et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080273210 | Hilde | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080278790 | Boesser et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090038182 | Lans et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090059004 | Bochicchio | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090081008 | Somin et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090095047 | Patel et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090134221 | Zhu et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090195790 | Zhu et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090225333 | Bendall et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090237411 | Gossweiler et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090268023 | Hsieh | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090272724 | Gubler | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090273770 | Bauhahn et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090313948 | Buckley et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090318815 | Barnes et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090323084 | Dunn et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090323121 | Valkenburg | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100035637 | Varanasi et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100060604 | Zwart et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100091104 | Sprigle | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100113153 | Yen et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100118200 | Gelman et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100128109 | Banks | May 2010 | A1 |
20100161170 | Siris | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100171740 | Andersen et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100172567 | Prokoski | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100177076 | Essinger et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100177080 | Essinger et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100177707 | Essinger et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100177749 | Essinger et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100202702 | Benos et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100208039 | Stettner | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100211355 | Horst et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100217678 | Goncalves | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100220849 | Colbert et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100220894 | Ackley et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100223276 | Al-Shameri et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100245850 | Lee et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100254611 | Amz | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100274728 | Kugelman | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100303336 | Abraham | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100315413 | Izadi et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100321482 | Cleveland | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110019155 | Daniel et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110040192 | Brenner et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110043609 | Choi et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110099474 | Grossman et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110169999 | Grunow et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110188054 | Petronius et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110188741 | Sones et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110202554 | Powilleit et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110234389 | Mellin | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110235854 | Berger et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110249864 | Venkatesan et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110254840 | Halstead | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110260965 | Kim et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110279916 | Brown et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110286007 | Pangrazio et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110286628 | Goncalves et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110288818 | Thierman | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110301994 | Tieman | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110303748 | Lemma et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110310227 | Konertz et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120024952 | Chen | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120056982 | Katz et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120057345 | Kuchibhotla | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120067955 | Rowe | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120074227 | Ferren et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120081714 | Pangrazio et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120111946 | Golant | May 2012 | A1 |
20120113223 | Hilliges et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120126000 | Kunzig et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120140300 | Freeman | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120168512 | Kotlarsky et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120179665 | Baarman et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120185094 | Rosenstein et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120190386 | Anderson | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120193423 | Samek | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120197464 | Wang et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120203647 | Smith | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120218436 | Rodriguez et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120223141 | Good et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120224026 | Bayer et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120224060 | Gurevich et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120236288 | Stanley | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120242852 | Hayward et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120113250 | Farlotti et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120256901 | Bendall | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120261474 | Kawashime et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120262558 | Boger et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120280908 | Rhoads et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120282905 | Owen | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120282911 | Davis et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120284012 | Rodriguez et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120284122 | Brandis | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120284339 | Rodriguez | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120284593 | Rodriguez | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120293610 | Doepke et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120293625 | Schneider et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120294549 | Doepke | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120299961 | Ramkumar et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120300991 | Mikio | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120313848 | Galor et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120314030 | Datta | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120314058 | Bendall et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120316820 | Nakazato et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130019278 | Sun et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130038881 | Pesach et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130038941 | Pesach et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130043312 | Van Horn | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130050426 | Sarmast et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130075168 | Amundsen et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130093895 | Palmer et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130094069 | Lee et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130101158 | Lloyd et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130156267 | Muraoka et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130175341 | Kearney et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130175343 | Good | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130200150 | Reynolds et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130201288 | Billerbaeck et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130208164 | Cazier et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130211790 | Loveland et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130222592 | Gieseke | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130223673 | Davis et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130257744 | Daghigh et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130257759 | Daghigh | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130270346 | Xian et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130287258 | Kearney | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130291998 | Konnerth | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130292475 | Kotlarsky et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130292477 | Hennick et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130293539 | Hunt et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130293540 | Laffargue et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130306728 | Thuries et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130306731 | Pedraro | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130307964 | Bremer et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130308013 | Li et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130308625 | Park et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130313324 | Koziol et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130313325 | Wilz et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130329012 | Bartos | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130329013 | Metois et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130342342 | Sabre et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130342717 | Havens et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140001267 | Giordano et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140002828 | Laffargue et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140008439 | Wang | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140009586 | McNamer et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140019005 | Lee et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140021259 | Moed et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140025584 | Liu et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140031665 | Pinto et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140034731 | Gao et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140034734 | Sauerwein | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140036848 | Pease et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140039674 | Motoyama et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140039693 | Havens et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140042814 | Kather et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140049120 | Kohtz et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140049635 | Laffargue et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140058612 | Wong et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140061306 | Wu et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140062709 | Hyer et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140063289 | Hussey et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140064624 | Kim et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140066136 | Sauerwein et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140067104 | Osterhout | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140067692 | Ye et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140070005 | Nahill et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140071430 | Hansen et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140071840 | Venancio | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140074746 | Wang | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140076974 | Havens et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140078341 | Havens et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140078342 | Li et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140078345 | Showering | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140079297 | Tadayon et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140091147 | Evans et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140097238 | Ghazizadeh | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140098091 | Hori | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140098792 | Wang et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140100774 | Showering | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140100813 | Showering | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140103115 | Meier et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140104413 | McCloskey et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140104414 | McCloskey et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140104416 | Giordano et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140104451 | Todeschini et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140104664 | Lee | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140106594 | Skvoretz | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140106725 | Sauerwein | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140108010 | Maltseff et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140108402 | Gomez et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140108682 | Caballero | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140110485 | Toa et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140114530 | Fitch et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140124577 | Wang et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140124579 | Ding | May 2014 | A1 |
20140125842 | Winegar | May 2014 | A1 |
20140125853 | Wang | May 2014 | A1 |
20140125999 | Longacre et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140129378 | Richardson | May 2014 | A1 |
20140131438 | Kearney | May 2014 | A1 |
20140131441 | Nahill et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140131443 | Smith | May 2014 | A1 |
20140131444 | Wang | May 2014 | A1 |
20140131445 | Ding et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140131448 | Xian et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140133379 | Wang et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140135984 | Hirata | May 2014 | A1 |
20140136208 | Maltseff et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140139654 | Takahashi | May 2014 | A1 |
20140140585 | Wang | May 2014 | A1 |
20140142398 | Patil et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140151453 | Meier et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140152882 | Samek et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140152975 | Ko | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140158468 | Adami | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140158770 | Sevier et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140159869 | Lumsteg et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140166755 | Liu et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140166757 | Smith | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140166759 | Liu et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140168380 | Heidemann et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140168787 | Wang et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140175165 | Havens et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140175172 | Jovanovski et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140177931 | Kocherscheidt et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140191644 | Chaney | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140191913 | Ge et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140192187 | Atwell et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140192551 | Masaki | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140197238 | Lui et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140197239 | Havens et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140197304 | Feng et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140201126 | Zadeh et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140203087 | Smith et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140204268 | Grunow et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140205150 | Ogawa | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140214631 | Hansen | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140217166 | Berthiaume et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140217180 | Liu | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140225918 | Mittal et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140225985 | Klusza et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140231500 | Ehrhart et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140232930 | Anderson | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140240454 | Lee | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140247279 | Nicholas et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140247280 | Nicholas et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140247315 | Marty et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140263493 | Amurgis et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140263645 | Smith et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140267609 | Laffargue | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140268093 | Tohme et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140270196 | Braho et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140270229 | Braho | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140270361 | Amma et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140278387 | DiGregorio | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140282210 | Bianconi | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140284384 | Lu et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140288933 | Braho et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140297058 | Barker et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140299665 | Barber et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140306833 | Ricci | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140307855 | Withagen et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140312121 | Lu et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140313527 | Askan | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140319219 | Liu et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140319220 | Coyle | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140319221 | Oberpriller et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140320408 | Zagorsek et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140326787 | Barten | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140332590 | Wang et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140333775 | Naikal et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140344943 | Todeschini et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140346233 | Liu et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140347533 | Ovsiannikov et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140350710 | Gopalkrishnan et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140351317 | Smith et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140353373 | Van Horn et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20140361073 | Qu et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20140361082 | Xian et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20140362184 | Jovanovski et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20140363015 | Braho | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20140369511 | Sheerin et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20140374483 | Lu | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20140374485 | Xian et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20140379613 | Nishitani et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150001301 | Ouyang | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150001304 | Todeschini | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150003673 | Fletcher | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150009100 | Haneda et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150009301 | Ribnick et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150009338 | Laffargue et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150009610 | London et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150014416 | Kotlarsky et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150021397 | Rueblinger et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150028102 | Ren et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150028103 | Jiang | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150028104 | Ma et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150029002 | Yeakley et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150032709 | Maloy et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150036876 | Marrion et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150039309 | Braho et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150040378 | Saber et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150042791 | Metois et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150048168 | Fritz et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150049347 | Laffargue et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150051992 | Smith | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150053766 | Havens et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150053768 | Wang et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150053769 | Thuries et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150062160 | Sakamoto et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150062366 | Liu et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150062369 | Gehring et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150063215 | Wang | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150063676 | Lloyd et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150069130 | Gannon | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150070158 | Hayasaka | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150071819 | Todeschini | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150083800 | Li et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150086114 | Todeschini | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150088522 | Hendrickson et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150096872 | Woodburn | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150099557 | Pettinelli et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150100196 | Hollifield | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150102109 | Huck | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150115035 | Meier et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150116498 | Vartiainen et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150117749 | Chen et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150127791 | Kosecki et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
20150128116 | Chen et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
20150129659 | Feng et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
20150133047 | Smith et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
20150134470 | Hejl et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
20150136851 | Harding et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
20150136854 | Lu et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
20150142492 | Kumar | May 2015 | A1 |
20150144692 | Hejl | May 2015 | A1 |
20150144698 | Teng et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
20150144701 | Xian et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
20150149946 | Benos et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
20150161429 | Xian | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150163474 | You | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150169925 | Chen et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150169929 | Williams et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150178900 | Kim et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150182844 | Jang | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150186703 | Chen et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150193644 | Kearney et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150193645 | Colavito et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150199957 | Funyak et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150204662 | Kobayashi et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150204671 | Showering | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150210199 | Payne | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150213647 | Laffargue et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150219748 | Hyatt | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150220753 | Zhu et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150229838 | Hakim et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150254485 | Feng et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150269403 | Lei et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150201181 | Herschbach | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150276379 | Ni et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150308816 | Laffargue et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150316368 | Moench et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20150325036 | Lee | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20150327012 | Bian et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20150332463 | Galera et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20150355470 | Herschbach | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160014251 | Hejl | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160169665 | Deschenes et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160040982 | Li et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160042241 | Todeschini | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160048725 | Holz et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160057230 | Todeschini et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160070982 | Li et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160063429 | Varley et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160088287 | Sadi et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160090283 | Svensson et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160090284 | Svensson et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160101936 | Chamberlin | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160102975 | McCloskey et al. | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160104019 | Todeschini et al. | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160104274 | Jovanovski et al. | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160109219 | Ackley et al. | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160109220 | Laffargue et al. | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160109224 | Thuries et al. | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160112631 | Ackley et al. | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160112643 | Laffargue et al. | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160124516 | Schoon et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
20160125217 | Todeschini | May 2016 | A1 |
20160125342 | Miller et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
20160133253 | Braho et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
20160138247 | Conway et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
20160138248 | Conway et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
20160138249 | Svensson et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
20160171720 | Todeschini | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160178479 | Goldsmith | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160180678 | Ackley et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160187186 | Coleman et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160187187 | Coleman et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160187210 | Coleman et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160189087 | Morton et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160191801 | Sivan | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160125873 | Braho et al. | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20160202478 | Masson | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20160203641 | Bostick et al. | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20160223474 | Tang et al. | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20160227912 | Oberpriller et al. | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20160232891 | Pecorari | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20160292477 | Bidwell | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20160294779 | Yeakley et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20160306769 | Kohtz et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20160314276 | Sewell et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20160314294 | Kubler et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20160343176 | Ackley | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20170115490 | Hsieh et al. | Apr 2017 | A1 |
20170121158 | Wong | May 2017 | A1 |
20170182942 | Hardy et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2004212587 | Apr 2005 | AU |
201139117 | Oct 2008 | CN |
3335760 | Apr 1985 | DE |
10210813 | Oct 2003 | DE |
102007037282 | Mar 2008 | DE |
1111435 | Jun 2001 | EP |
1443312 | Aug 2004 | EP |
2013117 | Jan 2009 | EP |
2286932 | Feb 2011 | EP |
2372648 | Oct 2011 | EP |
2381421 | Oct 2011 | EP |
2533009 | Dec 2012 | EP |
2562715 | Feb 2013 | EP |
2722656 | Apr 2014 | EP |
2779027 | Sep 2014 | EP |
2833323 | Feb 2015 | EP |
2843590 | Mar 2015 | EP |
2845170 | Mar 2015 | EP |
2966595 | Jan 2016 | EP |
3006893 | Mar 2016 | EP |
3012601 | Mar 2016 | EP |
3007096 | Apr 2016 | EP |
2503978 | Jan 2014 | GB |
2525053 | Oct 2015 | GB |
2531928 | May 2016 | GB |
H04129902 | Apr 1992 | JP |
200696457 | Apr 2006 | JP |
2007084162 | Apr 2007 | JP |
2008210276 | Sep 2008 | JP |
2014210646 | Nov 2014 | JP |
2015174705 | Oct 2015 | JP |
20100020115 | Feb 2010 | KR |
20110013200 | Feb 2011 | KR |
20110117020 | Oct 2011 | KR |
20120028109 | Mar 2012 | KR |
9640452 | Dec 1996 | WO |
0077726 | Dec 2000 | WO |
0114836 | Mar 2001 | WO |
2006095110 | Sep 2006 | WO |
2007015059 | Feb 2007 | WO |
200712554 | Nov 2007 | WO |
2011017241 | Feb 2011 | WO |
2012175731 | Dec 2012 | WO |
2013021157 | Feb 2013 | WO |
2013033442 | Mar 2013 | WO |
2013163789 | Nov 2013 | WO |
2013166368 | Nov 2013 | WO |
2013173985 | Nov 2013 | WO |
20130184340 | Dec 2013 | WO |
2014019130 | Feb 2014 | WO |
2014023697 | Feb 2014 | WO |
2014102341 | Jul 2014 | WO |
2014110495 | Jul 2014 | WO |
2014149702 | Sep 2014 | WO |
2014151746 | Sep 2014 | WO |
2015006865 | Jan 2015 | WO |
2016020038 | Feb 2016 | WO |
2016061699 | Apr 2016 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Thorlabs, Examiner Cited NPL in Advisory Action dated Apr. 12, 2017 in related commonly owned application, downloaded from https://www.thorlabs.com/newgrouppage9.cfm?objectgroup_id=6430, 4 pages. |
EKSMA Optics, Examiner Cited NPL in Advisory Action dated Apr. 12, 2017 in related commonly owned application, downloaded from http://eksmaoptics.com/optical-systems/f-theta-lenses/f-theta-lens-for-1064-nm/, 2 pages. |
Sill Optics, Examiner Cited NPL in Advisory Action dated Apr. 12, 2017 in related commonly owned application, http://www.silloptics.de/1/products/sill-encyclopedia/laser-optics/f-theta-lenses/, 4 pages. |
Chinese Notice of Reexamination in related Chinese Application 201520810313.3, dated Mar. 14, 2017, English Computer Translation provided, 7 pages. |
Extended European search report in related EP Application 16199707.7, dated Apr. 10, 2017, 15 pages. |
Ulusoy et al., One-Shot Scanning using De Bruijn Spaced Grids, 2009 IEEE 12th International Conference on Computer Vision Workshops, ICCV Workshops, 7 pages [Cited in EP Extended search report dated Apr. 10, 2017]. |
European Examination report in related EP Application No. 14181437.6, dated Feb. 8, 2017, 5 pages. |
Wikipedia, “Microlens”, Downloaded from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microlens, pp. 3. {Cited by Examiner in Feb. 9, 2017 Final Office Action in related matter}. |
Fukaya et al., “Characteristics of Speckle Random Pattern and Its Applications”, pp. 317-327, Nouv. Rev. Optique, t.6, n.6. (1975) {Cited by Examiner in Feb. 9, 2017 Final Office Action in related matter: downloaded Mar. 2, 2017 from http://iopscience.iop.org}. |
European Extended Search Report in related EP Application No. 16190017.0, dated Jan. 4, 2017, 6 pages. |
European Extended Search Report in related EP Application No. 16173429.8, dated Dec. 1, 2016, 8 pages. [Only new references cited: US 2013/0038881 was previously cited]. |
Extended European Search Report in related EP Application No. 16175410.0, dated Dec. 13, 2016, 5 pages. |
Peter Clarke, Actuator Developer Claims Anti-Shake Breakthrough for Smartphone Cams, Electronic Engineering Times, p. 24, May 16, 2011. |
Spiller, Jonathan; Object Localization Using Deformable Templates, Master's Dissertation, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa, 2007; 74 pages. |
Leotta, Matthew J.; Joseph L. Mundy; Predicting High Resolution Image Edges with a Generic, Adaptive, 3-D Vehicle Model; IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2009; 8 pages. |
European Search Report for application No. EP13186043 dated Feb. 26, 2014 (now EP2722656 (dated Apr. 23, 2014)): Total pp. 7. |
European Patent Office Action for Application No. 14157971.4-1906, dated Jul. 16, 2014, 5 pages. |
European Patent Search Report for Application No. 14157971.4-1906, dated Jun. 30, 2014, 6 pages. |
Caulier, Yannick et al., “A New Type of Color-Coded Light Structures for an Adapted and Rapid Determination of Point Correspondences for 3D Reconstruction.” Proc. of SPIE, vol. 8082 808232-3; 2011; 8 pages. |
Kazantsev, Aleksei et al. “Robust Pseudo-Random Coded Colored STructured Light Techniques for 3D Object Model Recovery”; ROSE 2008 IEEE International Workshop on Robotic and Sensors Environments (Oct. 17-18, 2008) , 6 pages. |
Mouaddib E. et al. “Recent Progress in Structured Light in order to Solve the Correspondence Problem in Stereo Vision” Proceedings of the 1997 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Apr. 1997; 7 pages. |
Proesmans, Marc et al. “Active Acquisition of 3D Shape for Moving Objects” 0-7803-3258-X/96 1996 IEEE; 4 pages. |
Salvi, Joaquim et al. “Pattern Codification Strategies in Structured Light Systems” published in Pattern Recognition; The Journal of the Pattern Recognition Society, Received Mar. 6, 2003; Accepted Oct. 2, 2003; 23 pages. |
EP Search and Written Opinion Report in related matter EP Application No. 14181437.6, dated Mar. 26, 2015, 7 pages. |
Hetzel, Gunter et al.; “3D Object Recognition from Range Images using Local Feature Histograms,”, Proceedings 2001 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. CVPR 2001. Kauai, Hawaii, Dec. 8-14, 2001; pp. 394-399, XP010584149, ISBN: 978-0-7695-1272-3. |
Second Chinese Office Action in related CN Application No. 201520810685.6, dated Mar. 22, 2016, 5 pages, no references. |
European Search Report in related EP Application No. 15190315.0, dated Apr. 1, 2016, 7 pages. |
International Search Report for PCT/US2013/039438 (WO2013166368), dated Oct. 1, 2013, 7 pages. |
Lloyd, Ryan and Scott McCloskey, “Recognition of 3D Package Shapes for Singe Camera Metrology” IEEE Winter Conference on Applications of computer Visiona, IEEE, Mar. 24, 2014, pp. 99-106, {retrieved on Jun. 16, 2014}, Authors are employees of common Applicant. |
European Office Action for application EP 13186043, dated Jun. 12, 2014(now EP2722656 (Apr. 23, 2014)), Total of 6 pages. |
Zhang, Zhaoxiang; Tieniu Tan, Kaiqi Huang, Yunhong Wang; Three-Dimensional Deformable-Model-based Localization and Recognition of Road Vehicles; IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, vol. 21, No. 1, Jan. 2012, 13 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/801,023, Tyler Doomenbal et al., filed Jul. 16, 2015, not published yet, Adjusting Dimensioning Results Using Augmented Reality, 39 pages. |
Wikipedia, YUV description and definition, downloaded from http://www.wikipeida.org/wiki/YUV on Jun. 29, 2012, 10 pages. |
YUV Pixel Format, downloaded from http://www.fource.org/yuv.php on Jun. 29, 2012; 13 pages. |
YUV to RGB Conversion, downloaded from http://www.fource.org/fccyvrgb.php on Jun. 29, 2012; 5 pages. |
Benos et al., “Semi-Automatic Dimensioning with Imager of a Portable Device,” U.S. Appl. No. 51/149,912, filed Feb. 4, 2009 (now expired), 56 pages. |
Dimensional Weight—Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia, URL=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dimensional_weight, download date Aug. 1, 2008, 2 pages. |
Dimensioning—Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia, URL=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dimensioning, download date Aug. 1, 2008, 1 page. |
Decision to Grant in counterpart European Application No. 14157971.4 dated Aug. 6, 2015, pp. 1-2. |
Leotta, Matthew, Generic, Deformable Models for 3-D Vehicle Surveillance, May 2010, Doctoral Dissertation, Brown University, Providence RI, 248 pages. |
Ward, Benjamin, Interactive 3D Reconstruction from Video, Aug. 2012, Doctoral Thesis, Univesity of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, 157 pages. |
Hood, Frederick W.; William A. Hoff, Robert King, Evaluation of an Interactive Technique for Creating Site Models from Range Data, Apr. 27-May 1, 1997 Proceedings of the ANS 7th Topical Meeting on Robotics & Remote Systems, Augusta GA, 9 pages. |
Gupta, Alok; Range Image Segmentation for 3-D Objects Recognition, May 1988, Technical Reports (CIS), Paper 736, University of Pennsylvania Department of Computer and Information Science, retrieved from Http://repository.upenn.edu/cis_reports/736, Accessed May 31, 2015, 157 pages. |
Reisner-Kollmann,Irene; Anton L. Fuhrmann, Werner Purgathofer, Interactive Reconstruction of Industrial Sites Using Parametric Models, May 2010, Proceedings of the 26th Spring Conference of Computer Graphics SCCG 10, 8 pages. |
Drummond, Tom; Roberto Cipolla, Real-Time Visual Tracking of Complex Structures, Jul. 2002, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 24, No. 7; 15 pages. |
European Search Report for Related EP Application No. 15189214.8, dated Mar. 3, 2016, 9 pages. |
Santolaria et al. “A one-step intrinsic and extrinsic calibration method for laster line scanner operation in coordinate measuring machines”, dated Apr. 1, 2009, Measurement Science and Technology, IOP, Bristol, GB, vol. 20, No. 4; 12 pages. |
Search Report and Opinion in Related EP Application 15176943.7, dated Jan. 8, 2016, 8 pages. |
European Search Report for related EP Application No. 15188440.0, dated Mar. 8, 2016, 8 pages. |
Second Chinese Office Action in related CN Application No. 2015220810562.2, dated Mar. 22, 2016, 5 pages. English Translation provided [No references]. |
European Search Report for related Application EP 15190249.1, dated Mar. 22, 2016, 7 pages. |
Second Chinese Office Action in related CN Application No. 201520810313.3, dated Mar. 22, 2016, 5 pages. English Translation provided [No references]. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/800,757 , Eric Todeschini, filed Jul. 16, 2015, not published yet, Dimensioning and Imaging Items, 80 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/747,197, Serge Thuries et al., filed Jun. 23, 2015, not published yet, Optical Pattern Projector; 33 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/747,490, Brian L. Jovanovski et al., filed Jun. 23, 2015, not published yet, Dual-Projector Three-Dimensional Scanner; 40 pages. |
Search Report and Opinion in related GB Application No. 1517112.7, dated Feb. 19, 2016, 6 Pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/793,149, H. Sprague Ackley, filed Jul. 7, 2015, not published yet, Mobile Dimensioner Apparatus for Use in Commerce; 57 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/740,373, H. Sprague Ackley et al., filed Jun. 16, 2015, not published yet, Calibrating a Volume Dimensioner; 63 pages. |
Intention to Grant in counterpart European Application No. 14157971.4 dated Apr. 14, 2015, pp. 1-8. |
United Kingdom Search Report in related application GB1517842.9, dated Apr. 8, 2016, 8 pages. |
Great Britain Search Report for related Application On. GB1517843.7, dated Feb. 23, 2016; 8 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/367,978, filed Feb. 7, 2012, (Feng et al.); now abandoned. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/277,337 for Multipurpose Optical Reader, filed May 14, 2014 (Jovanovski et al.); 59 pages; now abandoned. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/446,391 for Multifunction Point of Sale Apparatus With Optical Signature Capture filed Jul. 30, 2014 (Good et al.); 37 pages; now abandoned. |
U.S. Appl. No. 29/516,892 for Table Computer filed Feb. 6, 2015 (Bidwell et al.); 13 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 29/523,098 for Handle for a Tablet Computer filed Apr. 7, 2015 (Bidwell et al.); 17 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 29/528,890 for Mobile Computer Housing filed Jun. 2, 2015 (Fitch et al.); 61 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 29/526,918 for Charging Base filed May 14, 2015 (Fitch et al.); 10 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/715,916 for Evaluating Image Values filed May 19, 2015 (Ackley); 60 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 29/525,068 for Tablet Computer With Removable Scanning Device filed Apr. 27, 2015 (Schulte et al.); 19 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 29/468,118 for an Electronic Device Case, filed Sep. 26, 2013 (Oberpriller et al.); 44 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 29/530,600 for Cyclone filed Jun. 18, 2015 (Vargo et al); 16 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/707,123 for Application Independent DEX/UCS Interface filed May 8, 2015 (Pape); 47 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/283,282 for Terminal Having Illumination and Focus Control filed May 21, 2014 (Liu et al.); 31 pages; now abandoned. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/705,407 for Method and System to Protect Software-Based Network-Connected Devices From Advanced Persistent Threat filed May 6, 2015 (Hussey et al.); 42 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/704,050 for Intermediate Linear Positioning filed May 5, 2015 (Charpentier et al.); 60 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/705,012 for Hands-Free Human Machine Interface Responsive to a Driver of a Vehicle filed May 6, 2015 (Fitch et al.); 44 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/715,672 for Augumented Reality Enabled Hazard Display filed May 19, 2015 (Venkatesha et al.); 35 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/735,717 for Indicia-Reading Systems Having an Interface With a User's Nervous System filed Jun. 10, 2015 (Todeschini); 39 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/702,110 for System and Method for Regulating Barcode Data Injection Into a Running Application on a Smart Device filed May 1, 2015 (Todeschini et al.); 38 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/747,197 for Optical Pattern Projector filed Jun. 23, 2015 (Thuries et al.); 33 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/702,979 for Tracking Battery Conditions filed May 4, 2015 (Young et al.); 70 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 29/529,441 for Indicia Reading Device filed Jun. 8, 2015 (Zhou et al.); 14 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/747,490 for Dual-Projector Three-Dimensional Scanner filed Jun. 23, 2015 (Jovanovski et al.); 40 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/740,320 for Tactile Switch Fora Mobile Electronic Device filed Jun. 16, 2015 (Barndringa); 38 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/740,373 for Calibrating a Volume Dimensioner filed Jun. 16, 2015 (Ackley et al.); 63 pages. |
European extended search report in related EP Application 16190833.0, dated Mar. 9, 2017, 8 pages [only new art has been cited; US Publication 2014/0034731 was previously cited]. |
United Kingdom Combined Search and Examination Report in related Application No. GB1620676.5, dated Mar. 8, 2017, 6 pages [References have been previously cited; WO2014/151746, WO2012/175731, US 2014/0313527, GB2503978]. |
European Exam Report in related , EP Application No. 16168216.6, dated Feb. 27, 2017, 5 pages, [References have been previously cited; WO2011/017241 and US 2014/0104413]. |
Office Action in counterpart European Application No. 13186043.9 dated Sep. 30, 2015, pp. 1-7. |
Lloyd et al., “System for Monitoring the Condition of Packages Throughout Transit”, U.S. Appl. No. 14/865,575, filed Sep. 25, 2015, 59 pages, not yet published. |
McCloskey et al., “Image Transformation for Indicia Reading,” U.S. Appl. No. 14/928,032, filed Oct. 30, 2015, 48 pages, not yet published. |
Great Britain Combined Search and Examination Report in related Application GB1517842.9, dated Apr. 8, 2016, 8 pages. |
Search Report in counterpart European Application No. 15182675.7, dated Dec. 4, 2015, 10 pages. |
Wikipedia, “3D projection” Downloaded on Nov. 25, 2015 from www.wikipedia.com, 4 pages. |
M.Zahid Gurbuz, Selim Akyokus, Ibrahim Emiroglu, Aysun Guran, An Efficient Algorithm for 3D Rectangular Box Packing, 2009, Applied Automatic Systems: Proceedings of Selected AAS 2009 Papers, pp. 131-134. |
European Extended Search Report in Related EP Application No. 16172995.9, dated Aug. 22, 2016, 11 pages. |
European Extended search report in related EP Application No. 15190306.9, dated Sep. 9, 2016, 15 pages. |
Collings et al., “The Applications and Technology of Phase-Only Liquid Crystal on Silicon Devices”, Journal of Display Technology, IEEE Service Center, New, York, NY, US, vol. 7, No. 3, Mar. 1, 2011 (Mar. 1, 2011), pp. 112-119. |
European extended Search report in related EP Application 13785171.3, dated Sep. 19, 2016, 8 pages. |
El-Hakim et al., “Multicamera vision-based approach to flexible feature measurement for inspection and reverse engineering”, published in Optical Engineering, Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers, vol. 32, No. 9, Sep. 1, 1993, 15 pages. |
El-Hakim et al., “A Knowledge-based Edge/Object Measurement Technique”, Retrieved from the Internet: URL: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Sabry_E1-Hakim/publication/44075058_A_Knowledge_Based_EdgeObject_Measurement_Technique/links/00b4953b5faa7d3304000000.pdf [retrieved on Jul. 15, 2016] dated Jan. 1, 1993, 9 pages. |
H. Sprague Ackley, “Automatic Mode Switching in a Volume Dimensioner”, U.S. Appl. No. 15/182,636, filed Jun. 15, 2016, 53 pages, Not yet published. |
Bosch Tool Corporation, “Operating/Safety Instruction for DLR 130”, Dated Feb. 2, 2009, 36 pages. |
European Search Report for related EP Application No. 16152477.2, dated May 24, 2016, 8 pages. |
Mike Stensvold, “get the Most Out of Variable Aperture Lenses”, published on www.OutdoorPhotogrpaher.com; dated Dec. 7, 2010; 4 pages, [As noted on search report retrieved from URL: http;//www.outdoorphotographer.com/gear/lenses/get-the-most-out-ofvariable-aperture-lenses.html on Feb. 9, 2016]. |
Houle et al., “Vehical Positioning and Object Avoidance”, U.S. Appl. No. 15/007,522 [not yet published], filed Jan. 27, 2016, 59 pages. |
United Kingdom combined Search and Examination Report in related GB Application No. 1607394.2, dated Oct. 19, 2016, 7 pages. |
European Search Report from related EP Application No. 16168216.6, dated Oct. 20, 2016, 8 pages. |
Padzensky, Ron; “Augmera; Gesture Control”, Dated Apr. 18, 2015, 15 pages. |
Grabowski, Ralph; “New Commands in AutoCADS 2010: Part 11 Smoothing 3D Mesh Objects” Dated 2011, 6 pages. |
Theodoropoulos, Gabriel; “Using Gesture Recognizers to Handle Pinch, Rotate, Pan, Swipe, and Tap Gestures” dated Aug. 25, 2014, 34 pages. |
European Exam Report in related EP Application No. 16152477.2, dated Jun. 20, 2017, 4 pages. |
European Exam Report in related EP Applciation 16172995.9, dated Jul. 6, 2017, 9 pages. |
United Kingdom Search Report in related Application No. GB1700338.5, dated Jun. 30, 2017, 5 pages. |
European Search Report in related EP Application No. 17175357.7, dated Aug. 17, 2017, pp. 1-7. |
Ralph Grabowski, “Smothing 3D Mesh Objects,” New Commands in AutoCAD 2010: Part 11, dated May 19, 2017; 6 pages. |
European Exam Report in related EP Application No. 15176943.7, dated Apr. 12, 2017, 6 pages. |
European Exam Report in related EP Application No. 15188440.0, dated Apr. 21, 2017, 4 pages. |
Boavida et al., “Dam monitoring using combined terrestrial imaging systems”, 2009 Civil Engineering Survey Dec./Jan. 2009, pp. 33-38 {Notice of Allowance dated Sep. 15, 2017 in related matter}. |
EP Search Report in related EP Application No. 17171844 dated Sep. 18, 2017. 4 pages. |
EP Extended Search Report in related EP Applicaton No. 17174843.7 dated Oct. 17, 2017, 5 pages. |
UK Further Exam Report in related UK Application No. GB1517842.9, dated Sep. 1, 2017, 5 pages. |
Ulusoy, Ali Osman et al.; “One-Shot Scanning using De Bruijn Spaced Grids”, Brown University; 2009 IEEE 12th International Conference on Computer Vision Workshops, ICCV Workshops, pp. 1786-1792 [EPO Search Report dated Dec. 5, 2017]. |
Extended European Search report in related EP Application No. 17189496.7 dated Dec. 5, 2017; 9 pages. |
Examination Report in related EP Application No. 15190315, dated Jan. 26, 2018, 6 pages. |
Examination Report in related GB Application No. GB1517843.7, dated Jan. 19, 2018, 4 pages. |
Extended European Search report in related EP Application No. 17190323.0 dated Jan. 19, 2018; 6 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20170358098 A1 | Dec 2017 | US |