The present invention generally relates to wireless communication, and more specifically relates to scheduling transmissions from collocated Bluetooth device (BTD) and wireless local area network (WLAN) device.
In today's world the use of wireless personal area networks (WPANs) has been gaining popularity because of the flexibility and convenience in connectivity they provide. WPAN systems, such as those based on Bluetooth technology, provides wireless connectivity to peripheral devices and/or mobile terminals by providing short distance wireless links that allow connectivity within a specific distance (10-meter range). In contrast to WPAN systems, Wireless Local Area Networks (WLANs) provide connectivity to devices that are located within a slightly larger geographical area, such as the area covered by a building or a campus, for example. WLAN systems are based on IEEE 802.11 standard specifications, typically operate within a 100-meter range, and are generally utilized to supplement the communication capacity provided by traditional wired local area networks (LANs) installed in the same geographic area as the WLAN system. In some instances, WLAN systems may be operated in conjunction with WPAN systems to provide users with an enhanced overall functionality.
When operating a Bluetooth device (BTD) and a WLAN device in, for example, a wireless device, at two different types of interference effects may occur. One interference effect happens because the Bluetooth devices and WLAN devices transmit on the same or overlapping frequencies.
The second effect occurs if the transceiver of a Bluetooth device is in close proximity to the transceiver of a WLAN device as it is the case in mobile phones or personal digital assistants (PDA). In this instance the transmitter of one device overloads the receiver of the other device and the receiver is not able to receive any signals independent of whether the Bluetooth device and WLAN device use the same frequencies.
An additional problem arises in the increasingly common scenario in which both WLAN and Bluetooth are integrated into the same mobile phone or personal digital assistant (PDA). Collocation interferences arise because of the proximity of the two transceivers. Signals being transmitted from one device cause the other device's receiver to saturate and its receiver becomes desensitized. It becomes a design imperative therefore, to avoid a situation where one system transmits while the other one receives. Another problem occurs if both the systems are transmitting at the same time. Both the devices (Bluetooth device and WLAN device) operate in the same unlicensed ISM band at 2.4 GHz. In this case if both the devices transmit and receive at the same frequency and same time, there are technical challenges in meeting an effective communication. Hence, the transmission has to be scheduled in such a way that both the devices do not transmit at the same time. This is done using packet arbitration (PTA) technique. The PTA algorithm does not allow WLAN to transmit at certain points in time when the Bluetooth needs to receive or transmit. For example, consider a situation when a person is attending a phone call by using a Bluetooth headset and at the same time uploading/downloading emails using the WLAN. The PTA algorithm keeps the WLAN from transmitting at certain points in time when the Bluetooth needs to receive or transmit so that a clear voice is available on the Bluetooth headset.
In the standard communication scenario access points (AP) send frames to the stations (STA) and the STA send an acknowledgement (ACK) upon successful reception of a frame. If PTA is used for WLAN Bluetooth coexistence, Bluetooth can suppress transmissions of the collocated WLAN device. The possible frames that could be suppressed are ACK frames. These frames are sent as a response to a frame from the access point (AP). If the ACK frames are suppressed the access point could wrongly conclude that its frame got corrupted due to a noisy channel or weak signal and retransmit the same frame at a lower data rate. Frames with lower data rate have a higher probability to be corrupted by the collocated Bluetooth making it even more likely that an access point would further reduce its data rate. This ends in a spiral until the access point has reached the lowest data rate. This behavior sternly impacts the throughput of the WLAN system.
Hence, it would be advantageous to provide a method and a system to schedule transmissions from an access point in such a way that scheduling conflicts with the collocated Bluetooth device (BTD) are reduced. The present invention has been developed to meet these needs in the art.
The present invention provides a system and a method for improving the wireless local area network (WLAN) throughput performance in a collocated WLAN/Bluetooth system that uses packet traffic arbitration (PTA) to schedule WLAN and Bluetooth transmissions. The method includes detecting a Bluetooth transmission, where the Bluetooth transmission comprises one or more quiet periods; and scheduling a WLAN transmission, where frames of the WLAN transmission are received during the quiet periods of the Bluetooth transmission. The method according to the present invention allows the collocated WLAN to receive a frame send by the access point (AP) and acknowledge its reception without the AP reducing the data transmission rate due to unacknowledged frames. Also, the present invention discloses a mechanism where a collocated Bluetooth device (BTD) and WLAN device can communicate to the AP through a single antenna via a switch.
In an example embodiment of the present invention, a method for scheduling transmissions from collocated Bluetooth device (BTD) and wireless local area network (WLAN) device is provided. The method includes the steps of detecting a Bluetooth transmission, where the Bluetooth transmission comprises one or more quiet periods; and scheduling a WLAN transmission, where frames of the WLAN transmission are received during the quiet periods of the Bluetooth transmission. Scheduling a WLAN transmission further includes the steps of detecting a type of link of the Bluetooth transmission, sending power save polling (PS-Poll) frames from a WLAN station (STA) to an access point (AP) and requesting pending frames from the AP according to the type of link, and aligning the transmission of PS-Poll frames where the pending frames are received during the quiet periods of Bluetooth transmission.
In another example embodiment of the present invention, a system is provided for scheduling transmissions in wireless communication. The system includes a collocated Bluetooth device (BTD) and a wireless local area network (WLAN) device for enabling wireless communication through Bluetooth transmission and wireless local area network (WLAN) transmission, where the Bluetooth transmission comprises one or more quiet periods; and a wireless local area network (WLAN) station (STA) for scheduling wireless local area network (WLAN) transmission, wherein frames of the WLAN transmission from an access point (AP) are received during the quiet periods of the Bluetooth transmission. The WLAN station (STA) includes a scheduler for scheduling wireless local area network (WLAN) transmission. The scheduler sends power save polling (PS-Poll) frames from the WLAN station (STA) to an access point (AP) and aligns the transmission of the power save polling (PS-Poll) frames in a way that pending frames from the access point (AP) are received during the quiet periods of Bluetooth transmission.
In another example embodiment of the present invention, a system is provided for scheduling transmissions in wireless communication. The system includes a collocated Bluetooth device (BTD) and a wireless local area network (WLAN) device for enabling wireless communication through Bluetooth transmission and WLAN transmission, where the Bluetooth transmission comprises one or more quiet periods; a wireless local area network (WLAN) station (STA) for scheduling wireless local area network (WLAN) transmission, where frames of the WLAN transmission from an access point (AP) are received during the quiet periods of the Bluetooth transmission; and an antenna coupled to said collocated BTD and WLAN device. The WLAN station (STA) includes a scheduler for scheduling WLAN transmission. The scheduler sends PS-Poll frames from the WLAN STA to AP and aligns the transmission of the PS-Poll frames in a way that pending frames from the AP are received during the quiet periods of Bluetooth transmission. The collocated BTD and WLAN device communicates to the AP using a single antenna. This is accomplished by the PS-Poll frame mechanism where the WLAN frames are received during Bluetooth quiet periods. This antenna is triggered to the WLAN mode when WLAN is active and triggered to Bluetooth mode when Bluetooth is active.
The above summary of the present invention is not intended to represent each disclosed embodiment, or every aspect, of the present invention. Other aspects and example embodiments are provided in the figures and the detailed description that follows.
The invention may be more completely understood in consideration of the following detailed description of various embodiments of the invention in connection with the accompanying drawings, in which:
While the invention is amenable to various modifications and alternative forms, specifics thereof have been shown by way of example in the drawings and will be described in detail. It should be understood, however, that the intention is not to limit the invention to the particular embodiments described. On the contrary, the intention is to cover all modifications, equivalents, and alternatives falling within the spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims.
The PS-Poll frames are scheduled to minimize the frames that the collocated WLAN is not able to acknowledge. There are some frames that are corrupted due to other reasons than Bluetooth. These corrupted frames trigger the AP to lower its data transmission rate starting the spiral down to lower rates. Once the lowest data transmission rate is reached, the AP will not regain the higher data rates.
The rate recovery mechanism is a way to make the AP restart with the higher data rates. The rate recovery mechanism is explained as follows. The WLAN station (STA) detects unicast frames with low data transmission rates which are transmitted from the access point (AP). If a certain number (which is programmable) of such unicast frames are received, WLAN STA transmits a de-authentication frame to the AP. Due to the de-authentication frame, AP discards the information about the WLAN STA (e.g. data transmission rate about the WLAN STA). Following to sending the de-authentication frame, the WLAN STA resends an authentication frame and the AP restarts at the highest data rate.
WLAN station (STA) transmits a PS-Poll frame to the access point (AP). AP responds to the PS-Poll frame by sending an ACK frame back to the WLAN station followed by the transmission of pending frames. Upon receiving the pending frames, WLAN station acknowledges the reception by sending an ACK frame to the AP. The STA signals to the BTD that it is reserving the medium. Where the STA requests multiple pending frames from the AP, it acknowledges each reception with an ACK frame. The number of requested frames is programmable. In one embodiment, the STA requests frames during a predetermined amount of time, which can be programmable. In another embodiment, the BTD signals to the STA that it is reserving the medium. The BTD can reserve the medium for multiple frames, where the number of frames can be programmable. In one embodiment, the BTD can reserve the medium up to a predetermined amount of time, which can be programmable.
The scheduling of PS-Poll frames sent by the WLAN station makes sure that the pending frames from the AP are received and acknowledged during the quiet period of Bluetooth transmission (2.5 ms). If the STA is not in power save mode, AP will transmit pending frames at any time and if the frames fall in the time when Bluetooth is transmitting, there is a higher probability that the frames get destroyed. Also, when the frames are received early enough by the WLAN station, but if the Bluetooth is receiving in the next cycle, WLAN station cannot transmit the ACK frame successfully to the access point.
There are different signal lines between the Bluetooth device (BTD) and WLAN device. One among those signals is a priority line (PRI) which indicates important Bluetooth packets according to their priority status. When the PRI lines goes low (as illustrated in
If PRI interrupt is not received and if the PRI timer has expired, ACL mode is selected. There is the possibility of false detection of Bluetooth links because Bluetooth uses the PRI line also at other instances than during a SCO link (E.g. failed access during ACL data transmission, inquiry/paging (scan), scatternet, etc). False detection should only cause reduced throughput for the duration of one beacon period but not lead into a spiral that will cause the AP to lower the data transmission rate.
When response frames are received from AP, STA checks for the requirement of sending more PS-Poll frames. If the more flag is not set, STA releases WL and enters sleep. If the more flag is set, PRI timer is set to 2.5 ms. STA is not able to detect when the collocated Bluetooth device (BTD) is a master and transmits a Poll frame. The Bluetooth Poll frame is transmitted during the 2.5 ms when SCO link is not scheduling any information. If a PS-Poll frame is scheduled during a Bluetooth Poll frame the AP rate adaptation algorithm can be triggered. It is therefore advisable to increase the Bluetooth poll interval to at least 80 ms.
The regular Bluetooth poll frame can disturb the reception WLAN reception. It is therefore advisable that the Bluetooth polling period is increased to at least 80 ms or more. Scatternets also make use of additional PRI accesses. These accesses have the potential to disrupt the PS-Poll algorithm and can cause the AP to lower its data rate. Bluetooth parameters should be set in such that priority access is minimized.
In an alternative embodiment, an antenna switch mechanism is disclosed as described below.
An antenna switch 601 is coupled to the antenna 600 as shown in
In this embodiment, by the PS-Poll frame mechanism as described under the description of
The applications of the present invention includes, but not limited to, WPAN devices such as mobile phones or personal digital assistants (PDAs) that use Bluetooth and WLAN in a close proximity.
While the present invention has been described with reference to several particular example embodiments, those skilled in the art will recognize that many changes may be made thereto without departing from the spirit and scope of the present invention, which is set forth in the following claims.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/IB2007/052362 | 6/20/2007 | WO | 00 | 12/24/2008 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60817034 | Jun 2006 | US |