Example embodiments disclosed herein relate generally to input methodologies for electronic devices, such as handheld electronic devices.
Increasingly, electronic devices, such as computers, netbooks, cellular phones, smart phones, personal digital assistants, tablets, etc., have touchscreens that allow a user to input characters into an application, such as a word processor or email application. Character input on touchscreens can be a cumbersome task due to, for example, the small touchscreen area, particularly where a user needs to input a long message.
Reference will now be made in detail to various embodiments, examples of which are illustrated in the accompanying drawings. Wherever possible, the same reference numbers will be used throughout the drawings to refer to the same or like parts.
The present disclosure relates to an electronic device, such as a wired communication device (for example, a laptop computer having a touchscreen) or a mobile/handheld wireless communication device such as a cellular phone, smartphone, wireless organizer, personal digital assistant, wirelessly enabled notebook computer, tablet, or a similar device. The electronic device can also be an electronic device without wireless communication capabilities, such as a handheld electronic game device, digital photograph album, digital camera, or other device.
Predictive text input solutions have been introduced for assisting with input on an electronic device. These solutions include predicting which word a user is entering and offering a suggestion for completing and/or correcting the word.
Throughout this application, the terms “string” and “string of characters” are used interchangeably. Use of the indefinite article “a” or “an” in the specification and the claims is meant to include one or more features that it introduces, unless otherwise indicated. Thus, the term “a predicted string of characters” as used, for example, in “generating a predicted string of characters” can include the generation of one or more predicted strings of characters. Similarly, use of the definite article “the”, or “said”, particularly after a feature has been introduced with the indefinite article, is meant to include one or more features to which it refers (unless otherwise indicated). Therefore, the term “the predicted string” as used, for example, in “displaying the predicted string” includes displaying one or more predicted strings.
In one embodiment, a method is provided that receives an input, determines, by the processor, a likelihood that a predicted string associated with the received input matches an intended input string, where the determination is a function of at least one of a length of the predicted string and a typing speed associated with the received input, and displaying the predicted string. The predicted string is, for example, the product of a prediction algorithm. This and other embodiments described below provide the user with better predictions of the intended input. Better predictions can improve text input speed, reduce processing cycles and, in some instance, save power.
Main processor 102 is coupled to and can interact with additional subsystems such as a Random Access Memory (RAM) 108; a memory 110, such as a hard drive, CD, DVD, flash memory, or a similar storage device; one or more actuators 120; one or more force sensors 122; an auxiliary input/output (110) subsystem 124; a data port 126; a speaker 128; a microphone 130; short-range communications 132; an accelerometer 152; other device subsystems 134; and a touchscreen 118.
Device 100 includes a man-machine interface, for example, touchscreen 118, which includes a display 112 with a touch-active overlay 114 connected to a controller 116. User-interaction with a graphical user interface (GUI), such as a virtual keyboard rendered on the display 112 as a GUI for input of characters, or a web-browser, is performed through touch-active overlay 114. Main processor 102 interacts with touch-active overlay 114 via controller 116. Characters, such as text, symbols, images, and other items are displayed on display 112 of touchscreen 118 via main processor 102. Characters are inputted when the user touches the touchscreen at a location associated with said character.
Touchscreen 118 is connected to and controlled by main processor 102. Accordingly, detection of a touch event and/or determining the location of the touch event can be performed by main processor 102 of electronic device 100. A touch event includes, in some embodiments, a tap by a finger, a swipe by a finger, a swipe by a stylus, a long press by finger or stylus, a press by a finger for a predetermined period of time, and the like.
While specific embodiments of a touchscreen have been described, any suitable type of touchscreen for an electronic device can be used, including, but not limited to, a capacitive touchscreen, a resistive touchscreen, a surface acoustic wave (SAW) touchscreen, an embedded photo cell touchscreen, an infrared (IR) touchscreen, a strain gauge-based touchscreen, an optical imaging touchscreen, a dispersive signal technology touchscreen, an acoustic pulse recognition touchscreen or a frustrated total internal reflection touchscreen. The type of touchscreen technology used in any given embodiment will depend on the electronic device and its particular application and demands.
When the user touches touchscreen 118, touchscreen 118 can register a two-dimensional imprint of the touch. Touchscreen 118 can analyze the imprint and provide to main processor 102 the (X,Y) coordinates of the center of the touch, the geometrical characteristics of the touch, the pressure applied by the touch, and so forth. The geometrical characteristics include, for example, parameters defining the geometrical shape (e.g., circle, ellipse, square) approximating the touch area.
Main processor 102 can also interact with a positioning system 136 for determining the location of electronic device 100. The location can be determined in any number of ways, such as by a computer, by a Global Positioning System (GPS), either included or not included in electric device 100, through a Wi-Fi network, or by having a location entered manually. The location can also be determined based on calendar entries.
In some embodiments, to identify a subscriber for network access, electronic device 100 uses a Subscriber Identity Module or a Removable User Identity Module (SIM/RUIM) card 138 inserted into a SIM/RUIM interface 140 for communication with a network, such as network 150. Alternatively, user identification information can be programmed into memory 110.
Electronic device 100 also includes an operating system 146 and programs 148 that are executed by main processor 102 and that are typically stored in memory 110. Additional applications may be loaded onto electronic device 100 through network 150, auxiliary I/O subsystem 124, data port 126, short-range communications subsystem 132, or any other suitable subsystem.
A received signal such as a text message, an e-mail message, or web page download is processed by communication subsystem 104 and this processed information is then provided to main processor 102. Main processor 102 processes the received signal for output to display 112, to auxiliary I/O subsystem 124, or a combination of both. A user can compose data items, for example e-mail messages, which can be transmitted over network 150 through communication subsystem 104. For voice communications, the overall operation of electronic device 100 is similar. Speaker 128 outputs audible information converted from electrical signals, and microphone 130 converts audible information into electrical signals for processing.
In an example embodiment, the predictor is one of the programs 148 residing in memory 110 of electronic device 100. Accordingly, method 200 includes a predictor for generating predicted strings corresponding to the input string of characters. It can be appreciated that while the example embodiments described herein are directed to a predictor program executed by a processor, the predictor can be executed, for example, by a virtual keyboard controller.
Method 200 begins at block 210, where the processor (e.g., main processor 102) receives an input string of one or more characters (hereinafter, “input string”) from a virtual keyboard displayed on touchscreen 118. As used herein, a character can be any alphanumeric character, such as a letter, a number, a symbol, a punctuation mark, a space, and the like.
At block 220, the processor optionally generates one or more predicted strings such as words or phrases, acronyms, names, slang, colloquialisms, abbreviations, or any combination thereof based on the input string received in block 210. The predicted strings include, for example, strings that are stored in a dictionary of a memory of the electronic device (for example, words or acronyms), strings that were previously inputted by the user (for example, names or acronyms), strings based on a hierarchy or tree structure, a combination thereof, or any strings selected by a processor based on defined arrangement.
In some embodiments, the processor uses contextual data for generating a predicted string. Contextual data considers the context in which the input string is entered. Contextual data can include, for example, information about strings previously inputted by the user, grammatical attributes of the input string (for example, whether a noun or a verb is needed as the next string in a sentence), or any combination thereof. For example, if the string “the” has already been inputted into display, the processor can use the contextual data to determine that a noun or an adjective—instead of a verb—will be the next string after “the”. Likewise, if the string “Guy Lafleur played in the National Hockey” was inputted, based on the context, the processor can determine the subsequent string is likely to be “League”. Using the contextual data, the processor can also determine whether one or more characters in the input string are incorrect. For example, the processor can determine that the inputted character was supposed to be a “w” instead of an “a”, given the proximity of these characters on a QWERTY virtual keyboard. Any known predictive technique or software can be used to process the input string and the contextual data in generating the predicted strings at block 220.
In some embodiments, a predicted string generated at block 220 begins with the input string; in other words, the input string can constitute a prefix (a substring) of the predicted string. For example, if the characters “pl” are received as the input string from a virtual keyboard, the predicted strings generated at block 220 can begin with “pl”, and can include “please”, “plot”, and “place”. Similarly, if the user enters the input string “child”, the predicted strings generated at block 220 can include “children” and “childish”.
In some example embodiments, the processor generates at block 220 predicted strings to which the input string is not a prefix. For example, if the user inputs the string “id”, the processor can generate a predicted string “I'd”, even though “id” is not a substring of “I'd”. As another example, the processor can generate a predicted string “receive” for the input string “reci” (in case the user makes a spelling mistake or a typo). Because the input string does not have to be an exact substring of the predicted string, the user is allowed to make spelling or typing mistakes, use abbreviations, disregard the letter case, and so forth. Thus, the user can significantly increase the typing speed without sacrificing accuracy, by relying on the electronic device to automatically complete the input and correct it, if needed.
In some example embodiments, the predicted strings are not generated by the main processor 102. In these embodiments, main processor 102 provides the input string, for example, to a prediction processor (not shown), which generates predicted strings based on the provided input string, and sends the predicted strings to main processor 102. The prediction processor can be a software- or hardware-based module communicatively coupled to main processor 102. The prediction processor can be either local or remote to electronic device 100.
At block 230, the processor assigns scores (e.g., values) for the predicted strings generated at block 220. A score assigned to a predicted string reflects, for example, a likelihood (probability) that the user intends to input that predicted string, that is, the likelihood that the predicted string is the intended input, given the already inputted input string. A high score can indicate high likelihood, and vice versa, a low score can indicate lower likelihood. In some embodiments, the processor can assign ranks instead of scores. In those embodiments, a lower rank value can indicate a higher rank, that is, a higher likelihood that the predicted string is the input intended by the user.
At block 240, the processor displays one or more of the predicted strings on display 112. The displayed strings can be displayed at or near the input field, on the virtual keyboard (for example, on or near the <space> key or on keys corresponding to characters predicted as the next characters the user might input) or at any other suitable display location. In some embodiments, the processor limits the number of predicted strings that are displayed. For example, the processor can choose to display only a predetermined number (e.g., 1, 3, 10, etc.) of predicted strings that were assigned the highest scores. In embodiments where the processor assigns ranks instead of scores, the processor can choose to display only a predetermined number of highest-ranked predicted strings (e.g., predicted strings with lowest rank values).
Determining the Scores
In some embodiments, the scores assigned to predicted strings at block 230 are determined based on contextual data. For example, the processor can use contextual data (e.g., previously inputted strings) to determine that the input string is more likely to be a noun or an adjective. Accordingly, the processor can assign a higher score to predicted strings that are nouns or adjectives. In some embodiments, contextual data includes information about which programs or applications are currently running or being used by a user. For example, if the user is running an email application, then strings associated with that user's email system, such as strings from the user's contact list, can be used to determine the score of the predicted strings. N-grams, including unigrams, bigrams, trigrams, and the like, can be also used in determining the score.
Additionally, the geolocation of the electronic device or user can be used in the score determination. If, for example, the electronic device recognizes that a user is in an office building, then predicted strings that are generally associated with work can be assigned a higher score. If, on the other hand, the device determines that the user is at the beach, then predicted strings generally associated with the beach can be assigned a higher score.
Score as a Function of a Typing Speed and/or Predicted String Length
In some embodiments, the score assigned to the predicted string at block 230 is determined based on the typing speed of the user inputting the string and/or on the length of the predicted string. For example, if the processor determines that the user is typing fast, the processor can assign a higher score to the longer predicted strings and/or assign a lower score to the shorter predicted strings. Assigning a higher score to a predicted string makes the string more likely to be displayed by the processor at step 240.
When the user is typing fast, displaying a short predicted string may provide little or no benefit to the user, because it may take the user a significant time (e.g., 0.5 seconds) to notice the displayed string, to decide whether or not the displayed string is the intended input, and to select it if it is. Thus, if the user is typing fast (e.g., 4 characters per second), displaying a predicted string that is, for example, only two characters longer than the already typed input string, may not save the user any time. Even if the displayed predicted string is the one contemplated by the user, in the 0.5 seconds that would take the user to notice and select it, the user could simply type in the remaining two characters.
For example, if the user is typing fast and has typed the characters “id”, the processor can generate predicted strings “I'd”, “idea” and “identify”. If the processor did not take typing speed and string length into account, the processor could assign the highest score to “I'd” or to “idea”, for example, because these strings are more frequently used than “identify”. However, if the user is typing fast, and the processor considers the typing speed and the length of the predicted strings, the processor can assign the highest score to “identify”, because it is the only prediction string long enough to potentially save the user some time, as explained above.
In some embodiments, longer predicted strings are assigned higher scores when the typing speed increases, and lower scores when the typing speed decreases. Conversely, shorter predicted strings can be assigned higher scores when the typing speed decreases, and lower scores when the typing speed increases.
In some embodiments, the scores are determined based on the length of the input string. For example, the score can be a function of the typing speed and of the difference between the length of the predicted string and the length of the input string.
In some embodiments, the score depends on the number of character corrections that would be required to change the input string into the predicted string. For example, if the user typed “id” intending to type “I'd”, it could take the user as many as five corrections—deleting “d” and “i”, and inputting a capital “I”, “'”, and “d”—to arrive at the intended input.
In some embodiments, the score determination includes thresholds such as a length threshold and/or a speed threshold. For example, the processor can decrease the scores of predicted strings that are not longer than the input string by at least a certain length threshold. In some embodiments, such predicted strings can be assigned a predetermined score that would indicate to the processor not to display those strings.
In some embodiments, if the predicted strings are longer than the input string by at least the length threshold, the scores of such strings will not take into account the absolute length of the predicted string. In other words, in these embodiments, the score does not depend on the length of the predicted string as long as the predicted string is longer than the input string by the length threshold.
In some embodiments, the length threshold is a predetermined value, such as 0, 1, 3, etc. In other embodiments, the length threshold is a function of the typing speed. For example, the length threshold can be in direct relationship with the typing speed, that is, the length threshold increases when the typing speed increases, and the length threshold decreases when the typing speed decreases. For example, the threshold can reflect the number of characters that the user, maintaining the same typing speed, would type within a “reaction” time period. The reaction time period is, for example, the time period that would take an average user to notice the displayed predicted string, read it, decide whether or not it is the intended string, and select it if it is. In some embodiments, the reaction time period is a predetermined time period, such as 0.3 seconds, 0.5 seconds, 1 second, etc. In other embodiments, the reaction time period can be determined dynamically, for example, by checking how long it took the user to react to one or more previously displayed predicted strings.
In some embodiments, the score also depends on a predetermined speed threshold. For example, the score can be independent from the length of the predicted string if the typing speed is below the predetermined speed threshold. In other words, when the user is typing very slowly, the score may not take the length of the predicted strings into account at all.
The typing speed can be defined and measured by the processor using any suitable means. In some embodiments, the typing speed is defined, for example, as the average or median speed (e.g., in characters per second) over the last O inputted characters, last P words, last Q seconds, or any combination thereof, where O, P, and Q can be different predetermined numbers. In some embodiments, the typing speed is determined by combining the short-term speed (the speed with which the last several characters were typed) with the long-term speed (for example, the average speed across the entire input text).
As shown in
The processor can first assign scores based on factors other than typing speed and string lengths. For example, the processor assigns scores based on the contextual data, N-gram data, and geolocation data, as described above, and assigns the following scores, first:
The scores can, but do not have to, be normalized so that the sum of all the scores equals 1, in which case each score can represent a probability that the corresponding predicted string is the one intended by the user. In the above example, “I'd” and “identify” are assigned very low scores, for example, because the processor predicts that after entering an article “an” the user is inputting either a noun or an adjective.
The processor then considers the typing speed and the length of each prediction string, and adjusts the scores accordingly. Assuming, for example, that the user is typing at a speed of 4 characters per second, and that a predetermined reaction time period is 0.5 seconds, the processor can determine the length threshold to be 4×0.5=2 (indicating that at the current typing speed the user can type 2 characters within the reaction time period). Next, the processor can determine the difference in length between each predicted string and the input string “id”. In this example, the length differences would be: idea(2), ID(0), identical(7), ideological(9), I'd(1), and identify(6). Consequently, processor can decrease the scores of all prediction strings whose length difference is not above the length threshold (“idea”, “ID” and “I'd”), for example, by 2. The resulting scores would then become:
In some embodiments, scores of short predicted strings can be decreased by a predetermined percentage, by a predetermined value, or set at a predetermined value indicating to the processor that the strings should not be displayed at all.
The processor can then either increase the scores of the remaining (longer) predicted strings in accordance with their length, or keep their scores unchanged. In the above example, they are unchanged, and the predicted string “identical” emerges as the predicted string with the highest score.
The processor displays (240) one or more predicted strings on touchscreen 118. In this example, the processor is configured to display only the predicted string that was assigned the highest score. Therefore, the predicted string “identical” 380 is displayed on space key 350. The user can then input (select) the predicted string, for example, by pressing the space key 350. When the user inputs the predicted string, the processor can, for example, replace the input string “id” with the inputted predicted string “identical” at input field 330.
The processes and logic flows described in this specification can be performed by one or more programmable processors executing one or more computer programs to perform functions by operating on input data and generating output. The processes and logic flows can also be performed by, and apparatus can also be implemented as, special purpose logic circuitry, e.g., an FPGA (field programmable gate array) or an ASIC (application specific integrated circuit).
Certain features which, for clarity, are described in this specification in the context of separate embodiments, may also be provided in combination in a single embodiment. Conversely, various features which, for brevity, are described in the context of a single embodiment, may also be provided in multiple embodiments separately or in any suitable subcombination. Moreover, although features may be described above as acting in certain combinations and even initially claimed as such, one or more features from a claimed combination can in some cases be excised from the combination, and the claimed combination may be directed to a subcombination or variation of a subcombination.
Other embodiments of the invention will be apparent to those skilled in the art from consideration of the specification and practice of the invention disclosed herein. It is intended that the specification and examples be considered as examples only, with a true scope and spirit of the invention being indicated by the following claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3872433 | Holmes et al. | Mar 1975 | A |
4408302 | Fessel et al. | Oct 1983 | A |
5261009 | Bokser | Nov 1993 | A |
5664127 | Anderson et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5761689 | Rayson et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5832528 | Kwatinetz et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5963671 | Comerford et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
6002390 | Masui | Dec 1999 | A |
6061340 | Martin et al. | May 2000 | A |
6094197 | Buxton et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6223059 | Haestrup | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6226299 | Henson | May 2001 | B1 |
6351634 | Shin | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6421453 | Kanevsky et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6573844 | Venolia et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6621424 | Brand | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6646572 | Brand | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6801190 | Robinson et al. | Oct 2004 | B1 |
7061403 | Fux | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7098896 | Kushler et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7107204 | Liu et al. | Sep 2006 | B1 |
7216588 | Suess | May 2007 | B2 |
7259752 | Simmons | Aug 2007 | B1 |
7277088 | Robinson et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7292226 | Matsuura et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7382358 | Kushler et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7394346 | Bodin | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7443316 | Lim | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7479949 | Jobs et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7487461 | Zhai et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7526316 | Shimizu | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7530031 | Iwamura et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7539472 | Sloo | May 2009 | B2 |
7661068 | Lund | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7671765 | Fux | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7698127 | Trower, II et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7886233 | Rainisto et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7934156 | Forstall et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
8023930 | Won | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8059101 | Westerman et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8065624 | Morin et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8201087 | Kay et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8225203 | Unruh | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8289283 | Kida et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8326358 | Runstedler et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8490008 | Griffin et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8516386 | Adam et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8542206 | Westerman et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
20020080186 | Frederiksen | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020097270 | Keely et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020154037 | Houston | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020180797 | Bachmann | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20040111475 | Schultz | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040135818 | Thomson et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040140956 | Kushler et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040153963 | Simpson et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040168131 | Blumberg | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040201576 | Shimada et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20050017954 | Kay et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050024341 | Gillespie et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050039137 | Bellwood et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050052425 | Zadesky et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050093826 | Huh | May 2005 | A1 |
20050162407 | Sakurai et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050195173 | McKay | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050244208 | Suess | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050275632 | Pu et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050283358 | Stephanick et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060022947 | Griffin et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060026521 | Hotelling et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060033724 | Chaudhri et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060053387 | Ording | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060176283 | Suraqui | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060209040 | Garside et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060239562 | Bhattacharyay et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060253793 | Zhai et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060265648 | Rainisto et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060265668 | Rainisto | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060279548 | Geaghan | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070015534 | Shimizu | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070046641 | Lim | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070061753 | Ng et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070150842 | Chaudhri et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070156394 | Banerjee et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070157085 | Peters | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070229476 | Huh | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070256029 | Maxwell | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070263932 | Bernardin et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080033713 | Brostrom | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080100581 | Fux | May 2008 | A1 |
20080122796 | Jobs et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080126387 | Blinnikka | May 2008 | A1 |
20080136587 | Orr | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080141125 | Ghassabian | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080158020 | Griffin | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080168366 | Kocienda et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080184360 | Kornilovsky et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080189605 | Kay et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080195388 | Bower et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080231610 | Hotelling et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080259040 | Ording et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080266261 | Idzik | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080273013 | Levine et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080281583 | Slothouber et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080304890 | Shin et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080309644 | Arimoto | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080316183 | Westerman et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080318635 | Yoon et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090002326 | Pihlaja | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090006991 | Lindberg et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090025089 | Martin et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090058823 | Kocienda | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090058830 | Herz et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090066668 | Kim et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090077464 | Goldsmith et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090085881 | Keam | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090094562 | Jeong et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090125848 | Keohane et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090132576 | Miller et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090144667 | Christoffersson et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090150785 | Asami et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090160800 | Liu et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090167700 | Westerman et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090174667 | Kocienda et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090193334 | Assadollahi | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090213081 | Case, Jr. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090228792 | Van Os et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090228842 | Westerman et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090237361 | Mosby et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090240949 | Kitchens et al. | Sep 2009 | A9 |
20090247112 | Lundy et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090251410 | Mori et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090254818 | Jania et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090259962 | Beale | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090265669 | Kida et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090267909 | Chen et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090284471 | Longe et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090295737 | Goldsmith et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090307768 | Zhang et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090313693 | Rogers | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100020033 | Nwosu | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100020036 | Hui et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100026650 | Srivastava et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100045705 | Vertegaal et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100050121 | Shin | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100052880 | Laitinen | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100070908 | Mori et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100079413 | Kawashima et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100095238 | Baudet | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100097321 | Son et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100115402 | Knaven et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100127991 | Yee | May 2010 | A1 |
20100131900 | Spetalnick | May 2010 | A1 |
20100141590 | Markiewicz et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100156813 | Duarte et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100156818 | Burrough et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100161538 | Kennedy, Jr. et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100192086 | Kocienda et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100197352 | Runstedler et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100199176 | Chronqvist | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100225599 | Danielsson et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100235726 | Ording et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100253620 | Singhal | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100257478 | Longe et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100257490 | Lyon et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100259482 | Ball | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100259561 | Forutanpour et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100265181 | Shore | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100269040 | Lee | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100277424 | Chang et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100287486 | Coddington | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100292984 | Huang et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100293475 | Nottingham et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100295801 | Bestle et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100313127 | Gosper et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100313158 | Lee et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100315266 | Gunawardana et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100325721 | Bandyopadhyay et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100333027 | Martensson et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110010655 | Dostie et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110018812 | Baird | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110029862 | Scott et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110035696 | Elazari et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110041056 | Griffin et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110043455 | Roth et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110060984 | Lee | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110061029 | Yeh et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110063231 | Jakobs et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110074704 | Causey et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110078563 | Archer | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110078613 | Bangalore | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110086674 | Rider et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110090151 | Huang et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110099505 | Dahl | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110099506 | Gargi et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110119623 | Kim | May 2011 | A1 |
20110148572 | Ku | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110171617 | Yeh et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110179355 | Karlsson | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110193797 | Unruh | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110201387 | Paek et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110202835 | Jakobsson et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110202876 | Badger et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110209087 | Guyot-Sionnest | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110233407 | Wu et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110239153 | Carter et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110242138 | Tribble | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110248945 | Higashitani | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110249076 | Zhou et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110256848 | Bok et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110285656 | Yaksick et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110302518 | Zhang | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110305494 | Kang | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120005576 | Assadollahi | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120023447 | Hoshino et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120029910 | Medlock et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120030566 | Victor | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120030623 | Hoellwarth | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120030624 | Migos | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120036469 | Suraqui | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120053887 | Nurmi | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120062465 | Spetalnick | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120062494 | Hsieh et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120068937 | Backlund et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120079373 | Kocienda et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120084734 | Wilairat | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120092278 | Yamano | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120110518 | Chan et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120117506 | Koch et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120119997 | Gutowitz | May 2012 | A1 |
20120136897 | Kawauchi | May 2012 | A1 |
20120149477 | Park et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120159317 | Di Cocco et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120162081 | Stark | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120166696 | Kallio et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120167009 | Davidson et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120223959 | Lengeling | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120306772 | Tan et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120311437 | Weeldreyer et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130007606 | Dolenc | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130050222 | Moran et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130061317 | Runstedler et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130063356 | Martisauskas | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130067382 | Townsend et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130067411 | Kataoka et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130104068 | Murphy et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130120266 | Griffin et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130120267 | Pasquero et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130120268 | Griffin et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130125034 | Griffin et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130125036 | Griffin et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130125037 | Pasquero et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130176228 | Griffin et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130187858 | Griffin et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130187868 | Griffin et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130222249 | Pasquero et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130222255 | Pasquero et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130222256 | Pasquero et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130246329 | Pasquero et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130263038 | Griffin et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130271375 | Griffin et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130271385 | Griffin et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130275923 | Griffin et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130285916 | Griffin et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130285927 | Pasquero et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130285928 | Thorsander | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130285930 | Thorsander et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130290906 | Thorsander | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130314331 | Rydenhag et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130342452 | Kuo et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140002363 | Griffin et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140062886 | Pasquero et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140062923 | Thorsander et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140063067 | Compton et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140067372 | Pasquero et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140164977 | Spetalnick | Jun 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2688204 | Jul 2010 | CA |
2812457 | Oct 2013 | CA |
2813393 | Oct 2013 | CA |
2819839 | Dec 2013 | CA |
2820997 | Jan 2014 | CA |
101021762 | Aug 2007 | CN |
0844571 | May 1998 | EP |
0880090 | Nov 1998 | EP |
0880090 | Nov 1998 | EP |
1847917 | Oct 2007 | EP |
1847917 | Oct 2007 | EP |
1850217 | Oct 2007 | EP |
1909161 | Apr 2008 | EP |
1939715 | Jul 2008 | EP |
1942398 | Jul 2008 | EP |
2077491 | Jul 2009 | EP |
2109046 | Oct 2009 | EP |
2128750 | Dec 2009 | EP |
2146271 | Jan 2010 | EP |
2184686 | May 2010 | EP |
2214118 | Aug 2010 | EP |
2256614 | Dec 2010 | EP |
2282252 | Feb 2011 | EP |
2293168 | Mar 2011 | EP |
2320312 | May 2011 | EP |
2336851 | Jun 2011 | EP |
2381384 | Oct 2011 | EP |
2386976 | Nov 2011 | EP |
2402846 | Jan 2012 | EP |
2420925 | Feb 2012 | EP |
2431842 | Mar 2012 | EP |
2400426 | Mar 2013 | EP |
2618248 | Jul 2013 | EP |
2631758 | Aug 2013 | EP |
2653955 | Oct 2013 | EP |
2660697 | Nov 2013 | EP |
2660699 | Nov 2013 | EP |
2660727 | Nov 2013 | EP |
2703955 | Mar 2014 | EP |
2703956 | Mar 2014 | EP |
2703957 | Mar 2014 | EP |
2660696 | Jun 2014 | EP |
2011-197782 | Oct 2011 | JP |
2012-68963 | Apr 2012 | JP |
20120030652 | Mar 2012 | KR |
03029950 | Apr 2003 | WO |
03054681 | Jul 2003 | WO |
2004001560 | Dec 2003 | WO |
2005064587 | Jul 2005 | WO |
2006100509 | Sep 2006 | WO |
2007068505 | Jun 2007 | WO |
2007076210 | Jul 2007 | WO |
2007134433 | Nov 2007 | WO |
2008030974 | Mar 2008 | WO |
WO2008057785 | May 2008 | WO |
2008085741 | Jul 2008 | WO |
2009019546 | Feb 2009 | WO |
2010035574 | Apr 2010 | WO |
2010035585 | Apr 2010 | WO |
WO2010035574 | Apr 2010 | WO |
2010099835 | Sep 2010 | WO |
WO2010112841 | Oct 2010 | WO |
2011073992 | Jun 2011 | WO |
WO2011073992 | Jun 2011 | WO |
2011098925 | Aug 2011 | WO |
WO2011113057 | Sep 2011 | WO |
2012043932 | Apr 2012 | WO |
2013163718 | Nov 2013 | WO |
2013164013 | Nov 2013 | WO |
Entry |
---|
“Features Included in the T-Mobile G1”, http://www.t-mobileg1.com/T-Mobile-G1-Features.pdf, 2009. |
BlackBerry Seeker—Freeware—Pattern Lock v1.0.7, http://www.blackberryseeker.com/applications/preview/Pattern-Lock-v107.aspx, Jul. 28, 2009. |
Chong et al., Exploring the Use of Discrete Gestures for Authentication, IFIP International Federation for Information Processing, 2009. |
Conveniently select text, images, annotations, etc. in a PDF or any other text format on a touch based mobile/tablet device, IP.com Journal, Mar. 1, 2011, XP013142665, (10 pages). |
DROID X by Motorola © 2010 Screen shots. |
DROID X by Motorola © 2010 User Manual (72 pages). |
European Search Report dated Feb. 28, 2011, issued in European Patent Application No. 10160590.5. |
Extended European Search Report dated Aug. 24, 2012, issued in European Application No. 12166115.1 (5 pages). |
Extended European Search Report dated Aug. 31, 2012, issued in European Application No. 12166170.6 (7 pages). |
Extended European Search Report dated Oct. 9, 2012, issued in European Application No. 12166244.9 (6 pages). |
Extended European Search Report dated Sep. 10, 2012, issued in European Application No. 12166246.4 (6 pages). |
Extended European Search Report dated Sep. 10, 2012, issued in European Application No. 12166247.2 (8 pages). |
Extended European Search Report dated Sep. 21, 2012, issued in European Application No. 12164240.9 (6 pages). |
Extended European Search Report dated Sep. 25, 2012, issued in European Application No. 11192713.3 (7 pages). |
Extended European Search Report dated Sep. 3, 2012, issued in European Application No. 12164300.1 (7 pages). |
Google Mobile Help - Editing text, http://support.google.com/mobile/bin/answer.py?hl=en&answer=168926, date of access: Jun. 6, 2012 (2 pages). |
GSMArena - Samsung announce s5600 & s5230 full touch midrange phones, http://www.gsmarena.com/samsung—announce—s5600—and—s5230 full—touch—midrange—phones-news-825.php, Mar. 10, 2009. |
Hardware Sphere—Samsung s5600 & s5230 Touchscreen phones, http://hardwaresphere.com/2009/03/09/samsung-s5600-s5230-touchscreen-phones/, Mar. 9, 2009. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion issued in International Application No. PCT/EP2012/057944, on Oct. 12, 2012, (10 pages). |
International Search Report and Written Opinion issued in International Application No. PCT/IB2011/003273, on Jun. 14, 2012, (8 pages). |
International Search Report and Written Opinion mailed Sep. 10, 2012, issued for International Application No. PCT/EP2012/057945 (11 pages). |
iPhone User Guide—For iPhone OS 3.1 Software, 2009 (217 pages). |
Madhvanath, Sriganesh, HP-Gesture based computing interfaces, Mar. 2008. |
Manual del usuario Samsung Moment™ with Google™, dated May 20, 2012 (224 pages). |
Merrett, Andy, “iPhone OS 3.0: How to cut, copy and paste text and images”, http://www.iphonic.tv/2009/06/iphone—os—30—how—to—cut—copy—a.html, Jun. 18, 2009, XP002684215, (8 pages). |
Mobile Tech News—Samsung launches new Gesture Lock touchscreen handsets, http://www.mobiletechnews.com/info/2009/03/11/124559.html, Mar. 3, 2009. |
Partial European Search Report; Application No. 10160590.5; Sep. 16, 2010. |
Sprint Support Tutorial Set the Screen Lock Pattern—Samsung Moment, http://support.sprint.com/support/tutorial/Set—the—Screen—Lock—Pattern—Samsung—Moment/10887-171, date of access: May 31, 2012 (9 pages). |
Sprint Support Tutorial Unlock a Forgotten Lock Pattern—Samsung Moment, http://support.sprint.com/support/tutorial/Unlock—a—Forgotten—Lock—Pattern—Samsung—Moment/10887-339, date of access: May 31, 2012 (7 pages). |
Support—Sprint Cell Phones SPH-M900—Samsung Cell Phones, http://www.samsung.com/us/support/owners/product/SPH-M900?tabContent-content2, date of access: May 31, 2012 (1 page). |
T-Mobile Forum—Help & How to—Hidden Pattern, http://forums.t-mobile.com/tmbl/board/message?board.id=Android3&message.id=3511&query.id=52231#M3511, Oct. 23, 2008. |
T-Mobile Forum—Help & How to—Screen Unlock Pattern, http://forums.t-mobile.com/tmbl/board/message?board.id=Android3&message.id=6015&query.id=50827#M6015, Oct. 22, 2008. |
T-Mobile launches the highly anticipated T-Mobile G1, Oct. 22, 2008. |
U.S. Office Action dated Oct. 15, 2012, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/560,270 (15 pages). |
U.S. Office Action dated Oct. 17, 2012, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/563,943 (17 pages). |
U.S. Office Action dated Oct. 18, 2012, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/563,182 (12 pages). |
U.S. Office Action dated Oct. 23, 2012, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/764,298 (41 pages). |
U.S. Office Action dated Oct. 25, 2012, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/459,732 (15 pages). |
U.S. Office Action dated Oct. 5, 2012, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/447,835 (20 pages). |
U.S. Office Action dated Sep. 10, 2012, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/524,678 (12 pages). |
U.S. Office Action dated Sep. 28, 2012, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/494,794 (14 pages). |
U.S. Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/764,298, dated Jul. 20, 2012, (38 pages). |
U.S. Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/482,705, dated Aug. 7, 2012, (10 pages). |
User Guide Samsung Moment(TM) with Google(TM), dated Dec. 4, 2009 (122 pages). |
User Guide Samsung Moment(TM) with Google(TM), dated Mar. 2, 2010 (218 pages). |
“Windows Mobile Café—Software (Freeware): Touchpal, Let's Try Tabbing Up to 300 Chars/Min”, Nov. 4, 2007, retrieved from URL:http://windows-mobile-cafe.blogspot.nl/2007/11/software-freeware-touchpal-lets-try.html, accessed online Jan. 18, 2013 (2 pages). |
European Partial Search Report dated Jan. 16, 2013, issued in European Application No. 12182612.7 (5 pages). |
European Partial Search Report dated Mar. 7, 2013, issued in European Application No. 12184574.7 (5 pages). |
Extended European Search Report dated Feb. 28, 2013, issued in European Application No. 12182610.1 (7 pages). |
Extended European Search Report dated Jan. 25, 2013, issued in European Application No. 12166520.2 (8 pages). |
Extended European Search Report dated Mar. 8, 2013, issued in European Application No. 12182611.9 (8 pages). |
Extended European Search Report dated Nov. 22, 2012, issued in European Application No. 12172892.7 (7 pages). |
Extended European Search Report dated Sep. 25, 2012, issued in European Application No. 12176453.4 (7 pages). |
Extended European Search Report dated Sep. 25, 2012, issued in European Application No. 12180190.6 (8 pages). |
Final Office Action dated Feb. 1, 2013, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/563,943 (17 pages). |
Final Office Action dated Feb. 28, 2013, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/524,678 (21 pages). |
Final Office Action dated Jan. 18, 2013, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/482,705 (18 pages). |
Final Office Action dated Mar. 15, 2013, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/572,232 (36 pages). |
iPhone J.D. Typing Letters or Symbols That Are Not on the iPhone Keyboard dated Mar. 19, 2010, accessed “http://www.iphonejd.com/iphone—jd2010/03/typing-letters-or-symbols-that-are-not-on-the-iphone-keyboard.html” on Feb. 26, 2013 (3 pages). |
Notice of Allowance dated Mar. 15, 2013, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/373,356 (25 pages). |
Office Action dated Dec. 28, 2012, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/459,301 (22 pages). |
Office Action dated Jan. 22, 2013, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/564,687 (19 pages). |
Office Action dated Jan. 29, 2013, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/563,182 (19 pages). |
Office Action dated Jan. 7, 2013, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/564,070 (21 pages). |
Office Action dated Jan. 7, 2013, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/564,697 (19 pages). |
Office Action dated Mar. 12, 2013, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/560,796 (22 pages). |
Office Action dated Nov. 14, 2012, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/572,232 (24 pages). |
Office Action dated Nov. 16, 2012, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/554,583 (21 pages). |
Office Action dated Nov. 8, 2012, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/373,356 (18 pages). |
Office Action dated Oct. 26, 2012, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/554,436 (22 pages). |
PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jan. 24, 2013, issued in International Application No. PCT/CA2012/050274 (9 pages). |
PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Nov. 7, 2012, issued in International Application No. PCT/CA2012/050362 (9 pages). |
Swype Product Features, accessed online at http://www.swype.com/about/specifications/ on Feb. 25, 2013 (2 pages). |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/616,423, filed Sep. 14, 2012 (30 pages). |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/773,812, filed Feb. 22, 2013 (94 pages). |
Wang, Feng, et al., “Detecting and Leveraging Finger Orientation for Interaction with Direct-Touch Surfaces”, UIST '09, Oct. 4-7, 2009, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada (10 pages). |
Canadian Office Action dated Aug. 8, 2012, issued in Canadian Application No. 2,688,204 (3 pages). |
Canadian Office Action dated Jul. 17, 2014, issued in Canadian Application No. 2,813,393, (4 pages). |
Canadian Office Action dated Jul. 3, 2014, issued in Canadian Application No. 2,821,784, (3 pages). |
Canadian Office Action dated Jul. 8, 2014, issued in Canadian Application No. 2,793,629, (4 pages). |
Canadian Office Action dated Jun. 12, 2014, issued in Canadian Application No. 2,818,720, (3 pages). |
Canadian Office Action dated Jun. 12, 2014, issued in Canadian Application No. 2,821,772, (2 pages). |
Canadian Office Action dated Jun. 19, 2014, issued in Canadian Application No. 2,821,814, (3 pages). |
Canadian Office Action dated Jun. 2, 2014, issued in Canadian Application No. 2,812,033, (3 pages). |
Canadian Office Action dated Jun. 25, 2014, issued in Canadian Application No. 2,812,457, (5 pages). |
Canadian Office Action dated Jun. 30, 2014, issued in Canadian Application No. 2,819,839, (3 pages). |
Canadian Office Action dated Mar. 27, 2013, issued in Canadian Application No. 2,737,314 (3 pages). |
Canadian Office Action dated May 13, 2014, issued in Canadian Application No. 2,789,827, (4 pages). |
Canadian Office Action dated May 5, 2014, issued in Canadian Application No. 2,803,192, (4 pages). |
Distinctive Touch: Gesture-based lightweight identification for touchscreen displays, Electronic Max, Dec. 7, 2004, http://courses.media.mit.edu/2004fall/mas622j/04.projects/students/VanKleek/; accessed online Apr. 27, 2009, pp. 1-11. |
Enable or Disable SureType with a RIM BlackBerry Pearl Using Handheld Software, version 4.x, “http://www.wireless.att.com/support—static—files/KB/KB72601.html”, at least as early as Feb. 8, 2008 (3 pages). |
European Examination Report dated Apr. 11, 2014, issued in European Application No. 12182612.7, (5 pages). |
European Examination Report dated Apr. 16, 2014, issued in European Application No. 11192713.3, (7 pages). |
European Examination Report dated Apr. 5, 2013, issued in European Application No. 12180190.6 (7 pages). |
European Examination Report dated Aug. 22, 2013, issued in European Application No. 12166520.2, (4 pages). |
European Examination Report dated Aug. 22, 2013, issued in European Application No. 12173818.1, (6 pages). |
European Examination Report dated Dec. 9, 2013, issued in European Application No. 12172458.7, (4 pages). |
European Examination Report dated Jun. 2, 2014, issued in European Application No. 12166142.5, (4 pages). |
European Examination Report dated Jun. 3, 2014, issued in European Application No. 12172458.7, (5 pages). |
European Examination Report dated Mar. 12, 2014, issued in European Application No. 12169649.6, (7 pages). |
Extended European Search Report dated Aug. 24, 2012, issued in European Application No. 12172458.7 (6 pages). |
Extended European Search Report dated Aug. 27, 2012, issued in European Application No. 12169649.6 (7 pages). |
Extended European Search Report dated Dec. 21, 2012, issued in European Application No. 12173818.1, (8 pages). |
Extended European Search Report dated Jun. 26, 2013, issued in European Application No. 12184574.7 (10 pages). |
Extended European Search Report dated May 6, 2009, issued in European Application No. 09151723.5 (7 pages). |
Extended European Search Report dated Nov. 28, 2011, issued in European Application No. 11180985.1 (4 pages). |
Final Office Action dated Apr. 11, 2014, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/447,704, (15 pages). |
Final Office Action dated Apr. 25, 2013, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/564,697 (11 pages). |
Final Office Action dated Apr. 4, 2013, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/447,835 (20 pages). |
Final Office Action dated Aug. 29, 2014, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/485,723, (18 pages). |
Final Office Action dated Dec. 13, 2013, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/572,232, (23 pages). |
Final Office Action dated Feb. 10, 2014, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/485,723, (13 pages). |
Final Office Action dated Jul. 2, 2014, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/534,101, (15 pages). |
Final Office Action dated Jul. 24, 2014, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/616,423, (21 pages). |
Final Office Action dated Jul. 25, 2013, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/560,796, (19 pages). |
Final Office Action dated Jul. 28, 2014, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/569,000, (13 pages). |
Final Office Action dated Jul. 30, 2013, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/459,301 (27 pages). |
Final Office Action dated Jul. 9, 2013, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/564,070 (26 pages). |
Final Office Action dated Mar. 26, 2014, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/564,697, (9 pages). |
Final Office Action dated May 10, 2013, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/459,301 (16 pages). |
Final Office Action dated May 15, 2013, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/563,182 (21 pages). |
Final Office Action dated May 2, 2013, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/564,687 (17 pages). |
Final Office Action dated May 29, 2012, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/362,536 (16 pages). |
Final Office Action dated Oct. 26, 2011, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/362,536 (21 pages). |
Notice of Allowance dated Aug. 12, 2013, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/564,687, (10 pages). |
Notice of Allowance mailed Oct. 11, 2013, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/563,943, (20 pages). |
Office Action dated Apr. 11, 2014, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/481,171, (12 pages). |
Office Action dated Apr. 11, 2014, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/572,232, (38 pages). |
Office Action dated Apr. 18, 2014, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/524,678, (12 pages). |
Office Action dated Apr. 21, 2014, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/601,736, (19 pages). |
Office Action dated Dec. 6, 2013, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/564,697, (11 pages). |
Office Action dated Jan. 31, 2014, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/534,101, (12 pages). |
Office Action dated Jul. 21, 2014, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/525,576, (19 pages). |
Office Action dated Jun. 11, 2014, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/563,182, (8 pages). |
Office Action dated Jun. 18, 2014, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/601,898, (12 pages). |
Office Action dated Jun. 8, 2011, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/362,536 (19 pages). |
Office Action dated Mar. 12, 2014, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/616,423, (19 pages). |
Office Action dated Mar. 14, 2014, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/569,000, (10 pages). |
Office Action dated Mar. 26, 2014, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/548,469, (11 pages). |
Office Action dated May 15, 2014, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/482,705, (12 pages). |
Office Action dated May 2, 2014, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/459,301, (25 pages). |
Office Action dated May 21, 2014, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/485,723, (18 pages). |
Office Action dated May 30, 2013, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/572,232 (49 pages). |
Office Action dated Nov. 22, 2013, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/447,704, (16 pages). |
Office Action dated Oct. 17, 2013, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/485,723, (28 pages). |
PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Nov. 8, 2012, issued in International Application No. PCT/CA2012/050405 (12 pages). |
Through the Magic Window—Magic Window word processor for the Apple II, Artsci Publishing, 1980, http://www.artscipub.com/history/magicwindow, accessed May 21, 2013 (5 pages). |
Touchpal (combination of two sources: first, youtube video on touchpal at url: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eJUWFEXxJaI, dated on Dec. 1, 2011, with screen captures shown below; second, TimesofIndia website article on touchpal at url: http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2012-01-29/computing/30673975—1—swype-android-market-qwerty, dated Jan. 29, 2012). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140067372 A1 | Mar 2014 | US |